City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, May 21, 2013 To advance to the background material for each item in the agenda, click on the item title in the agenda or click on Bookmarks in the tool bar on the left side of your screen. AGENDA
CITY OF RICHARDSON – CITY PLAN COMMISSION
TUESDAY, MAY 21, 2013
7:00 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
411 W. ARAPAHO ROAD
BRIEFING SESSION: 6:00 P.M. Prior to the regular business meeting, the City Plan
Commission will meet with staff in the East Conference room, located on the first floor, to
receive a briefing on:
A. Discussion of Regular Agenda items
B. Staff Report on pending development, zoning permits, and planning matters
MINUTES
1. Approval of minutes of the City Plan Commission regular business meeting of May 7,
2013.
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Plan Commission
and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless desired, in which case any item(s) may be removed from the Consent Agenda for
separate consideration.
2. Galatyn Park North Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2, Block C; and Open
Space Lots 1 and 2, Block X: A request for approval of a final plat for six (6) lots within
147.52 acres, located at the northeast corner of Renner Road and Plano Road. Applicant:
Brad Moss, Kimley-Horn and Associates, representing BCS East Land Investments, L.P.
Staff: Susan Smith.
3. Bush Central Station Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block D: A request for approval of a final
plat for two (2) lots within 7.61-acres, located north of Renner Road, west of the future
extension of Routh Creek Parkway. Applicant: Brad Moss, Kimley-Horn and Associates,
representing BCS West Land Investments, L.P. Staff: Susan Smith.
4. Bush Central Station Addition, Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1, Block B; and Lot 1, Block C: A
request for approval of a final plat for three (3) lots within 18.96-acres, located at 3451 N.
Plano Road, 1225 E. Renner Road, and 1125 E. Renner Road; the northwest corner of
Renner Road and Plano Road. Applicant: Hugo Morales, Kimley-Horn and Associates,
representing BCS MFI, LLC. Staff: Susan Smith.
Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda
ds/endeavor/cpc/2013/CPC 2013-05-21 Agenda.doc
Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC HEARING
5. Zoning File 13-11: A City-initiated amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
(Appendix A), Article XXI-C (PD Planned Development District Regulations) Section 1
through Section 8, inclusive, of the Code of Ordinances relative to Intent, Use Regulations,
Building Regulations, Area Requirements, Parking Regulations, Planned Development
Review Procedure, and Amendments.
ADJOURN
The City Hall/Civic Center is wheelchair accessible. Any requests for sign interpretive services must be
made 48 hours ahead of the meeting. To make arrangements, call (972) 744-4100, or (972) 744-4001.
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall on or before 5:30p.m.,
Friday, May 17, 2013.
____________________________________
Kathy Welp, Executive Secretary
Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda
ds/endeavor/cpc/2013/CPC 2013-05-21 Agenda.doc
Page 2 of 2
Development Status Report & Map City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet Development Status Report
City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department
Updated: May 16, 2013
#
Name/Location
Project Information
Status
A request for a Special Permit for a restaurant
with drive through service to be located at 3601 N.
Jupiter Road, southwest corner of President
George Bush Highway and Jupiter Road. The
property is currently zoned LR-M(2) Local Retail.
Applicant: Roger Dalton, representing Notlad
Ventures, Inc. Staff: Mohamed Bireima.
City Plan Commission
April 17, 2013
Recommended Approval
A request for a Special Permit for a limited service
suite hotel to be located on the east side of
Glenville Drive, north of Greenville Avenue. The
property is currently zoned I-M(1) Industrial.
Applicant: Nick Patel, representing Richardson
Lodging. Staff: Israel Roberts.
City Plan Commission
April 17, 2013
Recommended Approval
VAR 13-06
Brick Row 7-Eleven
170 E. Spring Valley
Rd.
A request for a variance to the sign regulations of
the Spring Valley Station District to allow a
monument sign with digital display of gasoline
prices. The site is located at 170 E. Spring Valley
Road, the southeast corner of Spring Valley Road
and Centennial Boulevard. Applicant: Tommy Bell,
representing Barnett Signs. Staff: Israel Roberts.
City Plan Commission
May 7, 2013
Approved
VAR 13-07 & 13-08
Brick Row Monument
Sign
680 S. Greenville Ave.
A request for variances to the sign regulations of
the Spring Valley Station District to allow an offpremises monument sign within 5 feet of an
adjoining property line. The site is located at 680
S. Greenville Avenue, on the north side of Emily
Drive, west of Greenville Avenue. Applicant: Scott
Levy, representing L&B Realty Advisors. Staff:
Israel Roberts.
City Plan Commission
May 7, 2013
Approved
ZONING/SPECIAL PERMITS
1
2
ZF 13-07
Subway
3601 N. Jupiter Rd.
ZF 13-08
Hampton Inn & Suites
2210 N. Glenville Dr.
City Council
May 13, 2013
Denied
City Council
May 13, 2013
Approved
VARIANCES
3
4
City Council
June 10, 2013
Review
City Council
June 10, 2013
Review
PLAT/CONCEPT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVALS
5
Pittman & Stults
Addition
301-309 Maple Dr.
Replat: Consider and take necessary action on a
request for approval of a replat of Lots 17 and 18,
Block 2 into three (3) lots. The subject properties
are located at 301, 305 and 309 Maple Street and
zoned R-1250-M Residential. Applicant: Bryan
Connally, representing CBG Suveying, Inc. Staff:
Mohamed Bireima.
X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx
City Plan Commission
May 7, 2013
Approved
Page 1 of 3
Development Status Report
City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department
#
Name/Location
Project Information
Status
PLAT/CONCEPT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVALS (CONT’D)
6
Custer Court Addition
SE of Custer Pkwy. &
President George Bush
Highway
Replat: Consider and take necessary action on a
request for approval of a replat of Lot 5, Block A of
the Custer Court Addition to relocate utility
easements and to dedicate access easements for
emergency services. The site is located at the
southeast corner of Custer Parkway and
President George Bush Highway and is zoned PD
Planned Development. Applicant: Robert Jebavy,
representing Bury and Partners. Staff: Israel
Roberts.
City Plan Commission
May 7, 2013
Approved
7
Parkside Towns
Addition
NW of Lake Park Way
& Lake Park Blvd.
Replat: Consider and take necessary action on a
request for approval of a replat of the Parkside
Towns Addition to dedicate easements and adjust
lot lines. The site is located on the north side of
Lake Park Way, west of Lake Park Boulevard, and
is zoned PD Planned Development. Applicant:
Brian Bridgewater, representing Humphries and
Partners. Staff: Israel Roberts.
City Plan Commission
May 7, 2013
Approved
8
Galatyn Park North
Addition
NE of E. Renner Rd. &
N. Plano Rd.
Replat, Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2,
Block C; and Open Space Lots 1 and 2, Block
X: A request for approval of a final plat for six (6)
lots within 147.52 acres, located at the northeast
corner of Renner Road and Plano Road.
Applicant: Brad Moss, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, representing BCS East Land
Investments, L.P. Staff: Susan Smith.
City Plan Commission
May 21, 2013
9
Bush Central Station
Addition
N of E. Renner Rd.
between N. Plano Rd.
& DART ROW
Replat, Lots 1 and 2, Block D: A request for
approval of a final plat for two (2) lots within 7.61acres, located north of Renner Road, west of the
future extension of Routh Creek Parkway.
Applicant: Brad Moss, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, representing BCS West Land
Investments, L.P. Staff: Susan Smith.
City Plan Commission
May 21, 2013
Replat, Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1, Block B; and Lot
1, Block C: A request for approval of a final plat
for three (3) lots within the 18.96-acres, located at
3451 N. Plano Road, 1225 E. Renner Road, and
1125 E. Renner Road; the northwest corner of
Renner Road and Plano Road. Applicant: Hugo
Morales,
Kimley-Horn
and
Associates,
representing BCS MFI, LLC. Staff: Susan Smith.
X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx
Page 2 of 3
Development Status Report
City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department
#
Name/Location
Project Information
Status
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS
10
Zesty Mexican
Restaurant
800 W. Arapaho Road
Revised the site plan to reflect the installation of
an outdoor patio on the south side of the building,
fenced by a 3’ high wrought iron fence. Staff:
Mohamed Bireima.
Staff
April 25, 2013
Approved
1
7-Eleven Convenience
Store
3601 N. Jupiter Road
Revised the site and landscape plans to reflect
the demolition of the existing vestibule on the front
of the building and the replacement with split-face
CMU, brick, and storefront to match the existing
façade; the closure of northern driveway along
Jupiter Road; the construction of Seven (7)
additional parking spaces in front of the building;
and the addition of plant material in the landscape
buffers. Staff: Mohamed Bireima.
Staff
May 3, 2013
Approved
11
Breckinridge Point
Apartments
4250 E. Renner Road
Revised the site plan to reflect the installation of a
decorative fountain at two locations – at the
apartment entrance along Renner Road and at
the northwest corner of the property near the
intersection of Renner and North Star Road. Staff:
Mohamed Bireima.
Staff
May 6, 2013
Approved
X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx
Page 3 of 3
DALLAS
M
p
ci
Yale
Plano
Grove
Ce
nia
l
Audelia
Richland Park
Abr
ams
nt
en
College Park
Whitehall
Spring Valley
Buckingham
DALLAS
Spring-Valley
Buckingham
µ
Development Status Map
City of Richardson, Texas
Brand
Murphy
North Star
or
d
1.
Subway, 3601 N. Jupiter Rd. (ZF 13-07)
2.
Hampton Inn, 2210 N. Glenville Dr. (ZF 13-08)
Variance
3.
Brick Row 7-Eleven, 170 E. Spring Valley Rd. (VAR 13-06)
4.
Brick Row Monument Sign, 680 S. Greenville Ave. (VAR 13-07 &
13-08)
Plat/Concept/Development Plan
5.
Pittman & Stults Addition, 301-309 Maple Dr.
6.
Custer Court Addition, SE of Custer Pkwy. & President George
Bush Highway
Belt Line
Frances
Jupiter
Dorothy
ba
n
r ur
Int
e
ville
Gree
n
an
Sh
er m
3
45
GARLAND
Bowser
Lindale
ay
xp
lE
tra
en
/C
US
75
Polk
TI
Waterfall
Spring Valley
Apollo
Apollo
ss
w
Floyd
ed
We
ath
er
Dublin
Dumont
Glenville
Woodall
Main
re
Waterview
ry
Cottonwood
r
be
ew
N
Belt Line
Greenfield
Ho
lf
Owens
de
Alma
Richardson
Custer
Mimosa
West Shore
Collins
Arapaho
Coventry
Zoning/Special Permit
Melrose
10
Hartford
Shiloh
North Spring
Ow
ens
Rou
th
Jupiter
Cr e
ek
Lookout
al
Northlake
Coit
Wyndham
Alma
Collins
Cre e
k
Campbell
i
un
k
GARLAND
2
La
ke
si
Jonsson
Research
Galatyn
Prair
ie
University
Lake Park
Lookout
Breckinridge
d
7
Fall
Cree
k
k
l
rfie
Collin County
Dallas County
a
is
ee
Cr
Be
c
Renner
me
k
ee
Cr
l
Pa
Lookout
s
de
11
Sharp
s
ring
r Sp
Clea
on
ny
Ca
Synergy Park
9
Renner
Point North
1
ton
ring
Car
Frankford
ew
8
Infocom
Sum
vi
ter
Wa
6
e
Moroney
ns id
Gree
Telecom
President George Bush Turnpike
MURPHY
PLANO
7.
Parkside Towns Addition, NW of Lake Park Way & Lake Park Blvd.
8.
Galatyn Park North, NE of E. Renner Rd. & N. Plano Rd.
9.
Bush Central Station Addition, N of E. Renner Rd. between N.
Plano Rd. & DART ROW
Administrative Approval
10. Zesty Mexican Restaurant, 800 W. Arapaho Rd.
1.
7-Eleven Convenience Store, 3601 N. Jupiter Rd.
11. Breckinridge Point Apartments, 4250 E. Renner Rd.
1
Updated: May 16, 2013
0.5
0
1
2
Miles
Agenda Item 1 Approval of the minutes of the May 7, 2013 City Plan Commission Meeting City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet CITY OF RICHARDSON
CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES – MAY 7, 2013
The Richardson City Plan Commission met on May 7, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the
Council Chambers, 411 W. Arapaho Road, Richardson, Texas.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
David Gantt, Chairman
Barry Hand, Vice Chair
Gerald Bright, Commissioner
Janet DePuy, Commissioner
Marilyn Frederick, Commissioner
Eron Linn, Commissioner
Thomas Maxwell, Commissioner
Randy Roland, Alternate
MEMBER ABSENT:
Don Bouvier, Alternate
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Sam Chavez, Assistant Director – Dev. Svcs - Planning
Israel Roberts, Development Review Manager
Mohamed Bireima, Planning Technician
Kathy Welp, Executive Secretary
BRIEFING SESSION
Prior to the start of the regular business meeting, the City Plan Commission met with staff to
receive a briefing on staff reports, and agenda items. No action was taken.
MINUTES
1. Approval of the minutes of the regular business meeting of April 17, 2013.
Motion:
Commissioner Bright made a motion to approve the minutes as presented; second
by Commissioner Linn. Motion passed 7-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Replat – Pittman and Stults Addition: Consider and take necessary action on a request for
approval of a replat of Lots 17 and 18, Block 2 into three (3) lots. The subject properties are
located at 301, 305 and 309 Maple Street and zoned R-1250-M Residential.
Mr. Bireima advised that the purpose of the replat was to create three (3) lots that would
reflect the current ownership, and dedicate new easements. He reminded the Commission
that in April 2013, the subject properties were granted a variance from the City Council to
allow a side lot line that would not be perpendicular to the front property line.
Mr. Bireima confirmed that, as required by government code, property owners within 200
feet of the subject property were notified of the replat and to date no comments in opposition
had been received.
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
With no questions for staff, Chairman Gantt opened the public hearing. No comments were
made in favor or opposed and Chairman Gantt closed the public hearing.
Motion:
Commissioner Maxwell made a motion to approve Item 2 as presented; second by
Commissioner Frederick. Motion approved 7-0.
3. Replat – Custer Court Addition: Consider and take necessary action on a request for
approval of a replat of Lot 5, Block A of the Custer Court Addition to relocate utility
easements and to dedicate access easements for emergency services. The site is located at
the southeast corner of Custer Parkway and President George Bush Highway and is zoned
PD Planned Development.
Mr. Roberts stated the purpose of the replat was to dedicate two emergency access easements
that correspond with existing emergency access driveways, and to relocate utility easements
that conform to field adjusted infrastructure (i.e., water meters or fire hydrants). He added
that there were no other changes to the replat and the item did comply with City subdivision
regulations.
Chairman Gantt asked to clarify that the highlighted items were where the water meters
and/or fire hydrants would be located.
Mr. Roberts replied that was correct and two red lines were the emergency access easements,
which were approved earlier but not dedicated on the plat.
With no further questions for staff, Chairman Gantt opened the public hearing. No
comments or questions were made in favor or opposed and Chairman Gantt closed the public
hearing.
Motion:
Commissioner Bright made a motion to approve Item 3 as presented; second by
Vice Chair Hand. Motion approved 7-0.
4. Replat – Parkside Towns Addition: Consider and take necessary action on a request for
approval of a replat of the Parkside Towns Addition to dedicate easements and adjust lot
lines. The site is located on the north side of Lake Park Way, west of Lake Park Boulevard,
and is zoned PD Planned Development.
Mr. Roberts reported that the replat was requested to dedicate utility easement for an electric
line, and an adjustment to the side lot lines to meet side yard setbacks required by zoning, or
to meet the setback where a specific unit type was incorrectly represented on the original
plat. He added that the proposed replat met the City’s subdivision and design standards.
Commissioner DePuy asked if there were any changes to the elevations.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
2
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Mr. Roberts stated there were no changes to the building elevations, site plan or the
landscape design.
With no further questions for staff, Chairman Gantt opened the public hearing. No
comments or questions were made in favor or opposed and Chairman Gantt closed the public
hearing.
Motion:
Vice Chair Hand made a motion to approve Item 4 as presented; second by
Commissioner DePuy. Motion approved 7-0.
5. Variance 13-06 Brick Row 7-Eleven: Consider and take necessary action on a request for a
variance to the sign regulations of the Spring Valley Station District to allow a monument
sign with digital display of gasoline prices. The site is located at 170 E. Spring Valley Road,
the southeast corner of Spring Valley Road and Centennial Boulevard
Mr. Roberts explained that the variance had been before the Commission in April 2013;
however, through an oversight, a public hearing was not held and the item was back on the
agenda in order to hold the public hearing. He added that no changes had been made to the
variance request since the last submittal.
Chairman Gantt reminded the Commission that the variance had passed unanimously at the
previous meeting.
There were no questions for staff and Chairman Gantt opened the public hearing. No
comments or questions in favor or opposed were received and Chairman Gantt closed the
public hearing.
Motion:
Commissioner Linn made a motion to approve Item 5 as presented; second by
Vice Chair Hand. Motion approved 7-0.
6. Variances 13-07 & 13-08 Brick Row: Consider and take necessary action on a request for a
variance to the sign regulations of the Spring Valley Station District to allow an off-premises
monument sign. The site is located at 680 S. Greenville Avenue, on the north side of Emily
Drive, west of Greenville Avenue.
Mr. Roberts advised that the developers of the Brick Row townhome area was requesting one
variance to allow an off-premises neighborhood monument sign at the intersection of
Greenville Avenue and Emily Lane; and a second variance to allow the sign to be five feet
from the adjacent residential property. He added that the Spring Valley Station Development
Regulations did not allow a sign type for either an off-premises sign or neighborhood
monument sign.
Mr. Roberts pointed out that Chapter 18 of the City’s regulations requires 30 feet from a sign
to an adjacent residential property. He added that the proposed 4-foot by 10-foot sign would
reflect the Brick Row logo, name, as well as the word “townhomes”.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
3
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Chairman Gantt asked if the placement of the sign will intrude into the landscape area, and if
so, would there be room to move the sign further to the south.
Mr. Roberts replied that the sign would encroach into the landscape area that has low-growth
plants and seasonal color. He added that with the width of the sign (10 feet) would prevent it
from being located anywhere else.
Vice Chair Hand asked if the requested variances would permanently change the Planned
Development (PD), or would they be site specific.
Mr. Roberts replied it would be site specific only.
Commissioner Maxwell noted that the adjacent lot was undeveloped and wanted to know if
the lot was owned by the developer or if it had been sold to CB Jeni.
Mr. Roberts replied that he did not think the lot had been purchased by CB Jeni.
Commissioner DePuy asked if the adjacent lot was designated for a townhome and Mr.
Roberts replied that was correct.
Vice Chair Hand asked if the sign would be illuminated.
Mr. Roberts replied that there will be exterior illumination and suggested the applicant might
be better able to answer the question.
Commissioner Linn asked if the proposed monument sign would replace the temporary
promotional signage previously approved by the Commission.
Mr. Robert said he did not believe it would, but again suggested the applicant would be able
to answer the question.
With no other questions for staff, Chairman Gantt opened the public hearing.
Scott Levi, L & B Realty, representing the property owner, 8750 N. Central Expressway,
Suite 800, Dallas, Texas, stated the sign would have material similar to what has been used
on the townhomes in the area and would be illuminated with bullet lights. In regard to
ownership of the lot, he was not sure if the property had been sold to CD Jeni Homes, but the
lot was intended to be used for a townhome.
Regarding the temporary sign advertising CB Jeni Homes, Mr. Levi said he thought they
would be leaving the sign there until all the lots are sold.
Chairman Gantt asked if a future buyer would be notified that a monument sign would be
located on the side of their property.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
4
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Mr. Levi replied that he thought the CB Jeni representatives have shown the proposed
monument plan to almost everyone who has been interested in purchasing property in the
townhome development. He added that the current and future homeowners were in favor of
the sign and felt it would “brand” the neighborhood.
Mr. Levi noted that landscaping around the property was handled through a contract with a
landscaping company and if the landscaping was impacted by construction of the sign, then
those plants will be relocated.
Commissioner Frederick asked if there would be privacy fences built on the townhome end
lots.
Mr. Levi replied that so far no privacy fences have been built and he did not know if the PD
allowed any type of privacy fence.
Commissioner DePuy asked to clarify the statement that the other residents of the community
were in favor of the sign.
Mr. Levi replied that everyone he has spoken with was in favor of the monument sign and
felt it would help “brand” their community.
Chairman Gantt asked staff if the PD allowed privacy fences.
Mr. Roberts replied that the approved development plans did not allow privacy fence with
the exception of the southernmost lot adjacent to undeveloped office tract. He added that
the development plans only showed foundation plantings along the side of the townhomes.
Mr. Kevin Williams, 748 Matthew Place, Richardson, Texas, stated he was in favor of the
proposed monument sign; however, he wanted to know if there was an option to move it
further east, closer to the street, and suggested there should be landscaping underneath the
sign.
No other comments were made in favor or opposed and Chairman Gantt asked the applicant
if he would like to reply to Mr. Williams’ comments.
Mr. Levi stated that as far as the placement of the sign, the red line on the plans indicated a
25-foot setback and if the sign would go within the setback that would mean requesting
another variance from the City. He said he was not opposed to moving the sign closer and
thought that would increase the visibility.
Regarding landscaping around the sign, Mr. Levi said they would keep as much of the
current landscaping and add seasonal color as well.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
5
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Chairman Gantt concurred that landscaping around the monument sign would be better and
asked for a response to the question about lighting on the sign.
Mr. Levi replied that there will be small, bullet lights that will focus the beam on the sign so
it will not bleed over onto the homes and become a nuisance.
Commissioner Frederick asked if the applicant had considered putting the sign on an angle
for better visibility and did not think another variance would be needed to make that change.
Mr. Levi replied that as long as the sign was behind the setback line he did not think a
variance would be needed. In addition, the initial proposal for placement of the sign was to
accommodate all directions of traffic for the highest visibility possible, particularly on
Greenville Avenue, and angling the sign might not meet that goal; however, he was open to
meeting with the residents to get their input.
Vice Chair Hand concurred with Ms. Frederick and the fact that an entry sign was needed for
the community, but he was concerned about the style of lettering on the sign because of
previous experience with this type of sign being vandalized. He asked if the applicant was
open to changing to a more standardized monument sign similar to what the city used that is
made of cast stone. He was also concerned that the logo might become obsolete if the
community was ever rebranded.
Mr. Hand also asked staff if they had communicated with the City department in charge of
approving neighborhood signs.
Mr. Levi replied that any rebranding would not be in the near future or by the current owners
because so much time and money had been invested in branding Brick Row. He added that
the proposed style of lettering versus a cast stone might be an option to consider and was
wondering if the item would have to be tabled in order to allow a possible redesign of the
sign.
Chairman Gantt stated that the Commission was voting whether or not to grant two variances
and not on the design of the sign.
Mr. Levi said he would prefer not to table the item and he did not have the authority to
change the design of the sign. Levi offered to discuss the recommendations with his
superiors.
Vice Chair Hand acknowledged that the Commission was not an architectural committee, but
felt the sustainability of the sign would affect his decision to vote in favor or not.
Chairman Gantt stated that Mr. Hand’s suggestions were good points for the applicant to
consider, but reminded the Commission that the approval of the variances – placement and
allowing off-premises, was what was under the Commission’s purview.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
6
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Mr. Levi acknowledged that constant maintenance cost on the sign would pose an issue and
he would investigate further the possibility of removing the metal letters from the sign.
Commissioner DePuy asked the applicant if he felt the proposed placement of the sign was
the best location for optimal visibility.
Mr. Levi replied that he had looked at angling the sign, and was not opposed to that, but he
was trying to stay within the City’s 25-foot setback. In addition, he had reviewed the sight
visibility triangle and felt the sign would still be visible if a home was built on Lot 36A.
Commissioner Maxwell noted that the only thing the Commission was approving relative to
placement was the request to have the sign 5 feet off the property line.
Chairman Gantt concurred and added that the variance for allowing an off-premises sign was
also under consideration. He also wanted to know if the 25-foot setback was standard City
policy.
Mr. Roberts replied that the Spring Valley Station District standards require a 25-foot
setback for monument signs, and Chapter 18 has a 20-foot setback for signs.
Commissioner Roland asked if the placement would cause any problems with line-of-site for
traffic and Mr. Roberts replied there would not be a problem as long as the sign is at least 12
feet from back of curb.
Commissioner Bright asked if the item would have to be renotified for a public hearing if the
Commission considered something other than a 25-foot setback.
Mr. Roberts replied that it would and the notice would have to done before a separate
variance was submitted. He added that the minimum setback would have to be 20 feet unless
the applicant wanted to go through the Sign Board of Adjustment.
Commissioner Bright said a 20-foot setback would increase the presence and visibility and
he would vote in favor.
Mr. Roberts replied that if the applicant wanted to ask for an additional five feet for a total of
a 20-foot setback, then they would have to submit another variance request. He added that
the Commission could approve the current request and the applicant could return with a new
variance request asking for the additional five feet, or the Commission could deny the current
request and the applicant could resubmit and ask for a 20-foot setback at a later date.
Commissioner Maxwell asked to confirm that the Commission was only approving a request
for placement of the sign at five feet off the property line and not a 25-foot setback.
Mr. Roberts clarified that the required setback in the Spring Valley Station District was 25
feet for monument signs.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
7
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Chairman Gantt asked if the applicant was comfortable with a 25-foot setback or would they
prefer to resubmit and request a 20-foot setback.
Mr. Levi replied that a 20-foot setback would be a little better, but he did want to avoid
having to pay the fees involved with submitting another variance. He said he was not
opposed to waiting.
Chairman Gantt said the Commission understood the need for the sign, but explained that if
the Commission voted to approve the current request, the sign would have to be placed at 25
feet and not 20 feet. He added that if the applicant really wanted the sign at 20 feet, then that
could have an effect on how the Commissioners voted.
Mr. Levi asked if the item was tabled and he submitted a 20-foot request would the item be
placed on the next City Plan agenda.
Mr. Chavez replied that since there was no notification process, the item could be on the next
agenda. However, the applicant and Commission should consider the radius on the pavement
and if the sign was moved up five feet, then there could be a reduction in the side setback.
Commissioner Linn stated that if the sign was maintained at the current size, and moved
forward five feet, there was a possibility of encroaching on the sidewalk. He asked if the
applicant was willing to shrink the size of the sign.
Mr. Levi replied that the reason mentioned by Mr. Linn was why they originally asked for a
25-foot setback.
Commissioner Bright asked if the now vacant lot, Lot 36A was developed, would it impact
the visibility of the monument sign.
Chairman Gantt replied the applicant discussed earlier his review of the site and that even
with the development of Lot 36A the sign would still be visible for southbound traffic.
Mr. Williams asked to address the Commission again and requested that the sign should be
visible from either direction, or an optimal spot for the sign to be visible from at least one
direction. He felt the option being presented did not meet either goal and agreed with Ms.
Frederick’s assessment that the sign should be angled for optimal viewing.
With no further questions or comments, Chairman Gantt closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Hand asked if the both variances were approved would that be the end of any
adjustments to the request.
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
8
Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes
May 7, 2013
Chairman Gantt replied that the applicant would have the option to put a sign at the spot
indicated, whether it was angled or not, as long as it was behind the 25-foot setback and five
feet or more from the property line.
Vice Chair Hand stated that there seemed to be some interest on the part of the homeowners
and the applicant to work together to improve the sign. He said he was willing to vote in
favor of the request and suggested the two parties work together.
Chairman Gantt stated the Commission could table the item, or approve the item and give the
applicant the flexibility for make different choices about the design and/or placement. In
addition, if the variance was approved, the applicant could submit another variance asking
for a 20-foot setback. Gantt also suggested the applicant work with the homeowners for the
best possible outcome.
Motion:
Vice Chair Hand made a motion to approve Variance 13-07 as presented; second
by Commissioner DePuy. Motion approved 7-0.
Motion:
Commissioner Maxwell made a motion to approve Variance 13-08 as presented;
second by Commissioner Linn. Motion approved 7-0.
ADJOURN
With no further business before the Commission, Chairman Gantt adjourned the regular business
meeting at 7:58 p.m.
______________________________
David Gantt, Chairman
City Plan Commission
ds:CPC/2013/ 2013-05-07 Minutes.doc
9
Agenda Item 2 Replat:
Galatyn Park North Addition , Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2, Block C; and Open Space Lots 1 and 2, Block X City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet Galatyn Park North Addition
Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2, Block C; and
Open Space Lots 1 and 2, Block X
Attachments:
1. Locator
2. Final Plat Staff Report
3. Final Plat
Open Space
Lot 1, Block X
5.726-acres
N Plano Rd
Lot 1, Block C
52.603-acres
Lot 2, Block C
30.495-acres
CityLine Drive ROW
Lot 1, Block B
17.630-acres
Open Space
Lot 2, Block X
11.245-acres
Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2, Block C;
Open Space Lots 1 and 2, Block X
Galatyn Park North Addition
Lot 2, Block B
22.891-acres
This product is for informational purposes and may not have
been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying
purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and
represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries.
4
CITY PLAN COMMISSION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
May 21, 2013
Final Plat
PROJECT SUMMARY
Subdivision:
Lot 1, Block B
Lot 2, Block B
Lot 1, Block C
Lot 2, Block C
Lot 1, Block X
Lot 2, Block X
Staff Comments:
Galatyn Park North Addition
Lots 1 and 2, Block B; Lots 1 and 2, Block C; and
Open Space Lots 1 and 2, Block X
1511 E. Renner Road
1711 E. Renner Road
1550 E. President George Bush Highway
1750 E. President George Bush Highway
1648 E. President George Bush Highway
1629 E. Renner Road
Northeast corner of Renner Road and Plano Road
The purpose of the final plat is to create four (4) lots, two (2)
open space lots, dedicate right-of-way and easements for the
future development of the subject site.
The final plat complies with City zoning and development
regulations.
CPC Action:
Final decision
BACKGROUND
Tract Size:
147.52-acres (6,425,794 square feet)
Zoning:
(PD) Planned Development under Ordinance #3893
Right-of-way Dedication:
6.92-acres are being dedicated for the extension of CityLine
Drive (formerly Infocom Drive).
Easements/Setbacks:
Existing to Remain
100’ DP & L easement that bisects the site, along the eastern
property line of Lot 1, Block X and the western property line
of Lot 2, Block B;
30’ Water easement along Renner Road;
10’ Oncor Electric Delivery Company easement along
President George Bush Highway on proposed Lot 2, Block C
and along Wyndham Lane.
Page 1 of 2
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
X:\Development (new)\Development Plan Files\Subdivision Files\Galatyn Park North\147.52 Acres\Minutes and Staff Reports\2013-05-21
CPC\Final Plat.doc
Variable width Lone State Gas easement along Plano Road.
Dedicated by this Plat
60’ building setback along President George Bush Highway;
40’ parking structure and landscape setback along President
George Bush Highway;
20’ building setback along Wyndham Lane and CityLine
Drive;
10’ landscape setback along CityLine Drive (formerly
Infocom Drive);
60’ building setback along Renner Road on proposed Lot 2,
Block B;
40’ landscape setback along Renner Road on proposed Lot 2,
Block B;
40’ building and landscape setback along Renner Road on
Lot 1, Block B;
20’ building and landscape setback along Plano Road;
100’ drainage easement within Lot 1, Block X that
encroaches onto the western portion of Lot 2, Block C, and
continues south bisecting Lot 2, Block X;
Various drainage easements in Lot 2, Block X;
Various public and franchise utility easements throughout the
subject property.
Abandoned by this Plat
None
Page 2 of 2
111.9
S13°08 6'
'45"W
653.65'
STEWART
JUPITER
100' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
S31°20'44"E
131.73'
OPEN SPACE LOT 1, BLOCK X
5.726 ACRES
249,419 SQ. FT.
S3°00'05"W
48.04'
N0°26'05"W
547.93'
S2°09'00"E
52.90'
°20'
N17
LOT 1, BLOCK A
PENTAD ADDITION
CAB. G, SLIDE 267, M.R.C.C.T.
F.J. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 939
T. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 940
LOT 3A, BLOCK A
PENTAD ADDITION, CAB. K, SLIDE 291,
M.R.C.C.T.
RENNER ROAD
(VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.)
LOT 15B
S89°20'56"W
52.07'
L13
36'1
4"W
222.
48'
R
TE
ENGINEER:
Kimley-Horn and Assoicates, Inc.
12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75251
972-770-1300
Contact : Brad Moss, P.E.
15' D.E.
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Bush / 75 Partners, Ltd.
4801 West Lovers Lane
Dallas, Texas 75225
214-739-5553
ATTN: Joe Altemore
jaltemore@gmail.com
N0°58'13"E 858.75'
L67
4
1
L6
5
L4
=39°06'20"
R=1156.50'
L=789.34'
CB=N88°52'14"W
C=774.10'
N1°03'56"E 333.83'
S3 144.4
2°
03 6'
'51
"W
L62
'00"E
212.21'
N89°20'56"E
122.45'
GALATYN PARK NORTH
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK B
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK C
OPEN SPACE LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK X
45' ENCROACHMENT ONTO EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20100504000441570
40' LANDSCAPE
L.R.C.C.T.
SETBACK
S45°39'04"E
35.36'
3
123.40'
S7°48'37"W
159.11'
S7°48'37"W
02
N44°20'56"E
35.36'
S80°47
734.14'
L5
NT
ASE
116.
50
°23' '
58"W
L23
L24
L1
L104
BEING A FINAL PLAT OF
147.516 ACRES / 6,425,794 SQ. FT.
FROM THE F.J. VANCE SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 939
CITY OF RICHARDSON
COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
30' WATER EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20101004001065480
L.R.C.C.T.
60' BUILDING
SETBACK
N88°56'59"E
78.97'
L90
29.95'
5
N89°20'56"E 367.08'
100.04'
L5
80.00'
OPEN SPACE LOT 2, BLOCK X
11.245 ACRES
489,854 SQ. FT.
L84
L1
01
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
S20
DR
100'
L25
L103
L39
0
L4
C4
111.14'
L38
ADDRESS:
LOT 1, BLOCK B - 1511 E. RENNER ROAD
LOT 2, BLOCK B - 1711 E. RENNER ROAD
LOT 1, BLOCK C - 1550 E. PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH HIGHWAY
LOT 2, BLOCK C - 1750 E. PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH HIGHWAY
LOT 1, BLOCK X - 1648 E. PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH HIGHWAY
LOT 2, BLOCK X - 1629 E. RENNER ROAD
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
100' D. P. & L. EASEMENT
VOL. 590, PG. 354
D.R.C.C.T.
ME
143.
98
°23' '
58"W
AIN
AG
S20
L74
L75
S0°00'54"W
86.57'
74.31'
S5°13'43"W
L88
L37
30.0'
L85
L89
5/8" IRSC
52.07'
EE
N0°49'14"W 597.74'
L81
L78
L79
L86
S89°20'56"W
681.41'
5/8" IRSC
N83°56'47"W
100.26'
C2
L21
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
S89°20'56"W 1244.40'
723.98'
25.96'
35'X80' CHANNEL
EASEMENT
VOL. 1844, PG. 212
L.R.C.C.T.
LOT 7
LOT 16
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 19
FOXBORO ADDITION SECTION 2
CAB. 12, SLIDE 5, M.R.C.C.T.
LOT 20
SHERRILL PARK
CAB. C, SLIDE 142
M.R.C.C.T.
LOT 1
WESSEX
CIRCLE
S89°10'46"W
350.00'
N0°49'14"W 650.33'
650.25'
S89°10'46"W 679.65'
S89°10'46"W
N89°10'46"E
350.00'
N1°10'46"E 402.59'
6'
.9
66
137.08'
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5
(140' R.O.W.)
N0°49'14"W
L30
L32
30.04'
7
L1
L56
7
L31
5/8" IRSC
5/8" IRSC
N5°13'43"E
11.18'
U.E.
40' BUILDING &
LANDSCAPE SETBACK
L41
L54
S89°10'46"W 361.59'
30' WATER EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20101004001065480
L.R.C.C.T.
L96
L99
L100
1"E
S10°15'5
90.21'
N83°56'47"W
100.26'
3"W
7'1
9°2 .05'
89
S5
4'
8 7. 4
L19
15' D.E.
L15
9
L4
6
L6
87'
131.
2"W
23'4
S72°
4
L6
7
BCS EAST LAND
INVESTMENTS, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001611950
L.R.C.C.T.
5' PEDESTRIAN & UTIL. EASEMENT
VOL. 2719, PG. 470
S0°49'14"E
L.R.C.C.T.
5.00'
L9
L20
L16
8
L1
L4
79'
139.
2"W
23'4
S72°
8
LEGEND:
L14
12.59'
"W
'59
22 0'
.2
78
4°
S5
All bearings shown are relative to grid north of the Texas Coordinate System of 1983
based on the City of Richardson control monument system (North Central Zone 4202).
All dimensions shown are ground distances.
All coordinates shown are grid
coordinates based on monuments 50 and 52 and a CSF of 0.99987307062.
16.11'
25.25'
6
5
LOT 1, BLOCK B
17.630 ACRES
767,981 SQ. FT.
20' BUILDING &
LANDSCAPE SETBACK
22.94'
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
L7
1
L7
L9
S59°33'55"W
54.53'
0
=17°36'10"
R=1043.50'
L=320.59'
CB=S80°22'41"W
C=319.33'
L9
30' U.E.
VARIABLE WIDTH
LONE STAR GAS
EASEMENT
VOL. 617, PG. 156
D.R.C.C.T.
L68
NOTES:
The purpose of this plat is to create 4 lots, 2 open space lots,
and dedicate right-of-way and easements for the 147 acres of
unplatted land.
17.65'
L11
L10
7'
L5
15' D.E.
5
L3
C1
N0°31'25"W
150.67'
5/8" IRSC
L69
15.00'
N36°51'45"E
48.07'
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
S0°31'25"E
165.77'
N: 7050548.0483
E: 2520522.3107
4.05'
N88°07'03"E 252.93'
30.00'
5'X15' D.E.
WATER
APPURTENANCE
L1
128.
S17° 36'
36'1
4"W
497.53'
8.69'
N44°28'35"E
16.61'
FOXBORO
DRIVE
93.50'
617.50'
According to Community Panel No. 48085C0390J , dated JUNE 2, 2009 and
Community Panel No. 48085C0505J , dated JUNE 2, 2009 of the National Flood
Insurance Program Map, Flood Insurance Rate Map of COLLIN County, Texas,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, this
property is not within a special flood hazard area. If this site is not within an identified
special flood hazard area, this flood statement does not imply that the property and/or
the structures thereon will be free from flooding or flood damage. On rare occasions,
greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or
natural causes. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the
surveyor.
5/16/2013 1:26 PM
82.3
9 5. 3
S89°10'46"W 1138.71'
200
12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75251
FIRM # 101155-00
Tel. No. (972) 770-1300
Fax No. (972) 239-3820
Scale
Drawn by
Checked by
Date
Project No.
Sheet No.
1" = 100'
SRD
DAB
OCT. 2012
068527002
1 OF 2
PLOTTED BY DUNN, STACY 5/17/2013 9:16 AM LAST SAVED
4'
30.79'
N89°10'46"E 328.80'
279.75'
100
DWG NAME: K:\DAL_SURVEY\068176014-KDC GUAPO\DWG\068176014-GALATYN PARK FINAL PLAT.DWG
20
8
21 .25'
'59
"W
1°
3'
CITYLINE DRIVE
N89°10'46"E 1517.22'
S44°22'20"W
70.95'
50
D.E. = DRAINAGE EASEMENT
D.&U.E. = DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
U.E. = UTILITY EASEMENT
= CENTRAL ANGLE
P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCING
P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
IRSC = 5/8" IRON ROD W/ "KHA" CAP SET
C.M. = CONTROLLING MONUMENT
S0°58'13"W
64.76'
S4
4 6. 4
14 6 . 7 9 '
238.83'
0
1" = 100' @ 24X36
FLOOD STATEMENT:
51.29'
35.55'
S24°14'23"E
22'
08'
32.58'
244.
249.
36"E
5'
22.08'
36"E
°34'
82.2
°34'
N71
N71
5'
N71°34'36"E
5 4 .8
16.23'
141.49'
0'
59.8
S71°34'36"W
L8
107.58'
7'
65.4
L9
4.35'
33'X15'
D.E.
190.34'
285.00'
N89°10'46"E 1466.93'
53.26'
201.74'
20'X30'
D.&U.E.
S41°21'59"W
97.03'
S17°
93.50'
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
87' R.O.W.
139.89'
113.98'
15'x20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
15'x20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
S49°23'48"W
188.97'
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
100
C5
=17°36'10"
R=1000.00'
L=307.23'
CB=N80°22'41"E
C=306.02'
15'x20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
20'X30'
D.&U.E.
15' D.E.
S44°33'55"W
33.00'
=39°06'20"
R=1200.00'
L=819.03'
CB=N88°52'14"W
C=803.22'
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
N71°34'36"E
4.85'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
L106
L105
C
S45°26'05"E
15.00'
S1°27'20"E
85.51'
L7
N0°26'05"W 1313.04'
N44°33'55"E
48.20'
=39°06'20"
R=1243.50'
L=848.72'
CB=N88°52'14"W
C=832.34'
S11°06'02"E
49.00'
S49°23'48"W
148.45'
=11°32'10"
R=956.50'
L=192.58'
CB=N83°24'41"E
C=192.26'
R.O.W. DEDICATION
6.926 ACRES
301,676 SQ. FT.
S45°37'40"E
70.47'
51"E
=6°04'00"
R=956.50'
L=101.28'
CB=N74°36'36"E
C=101.23'
S3°00'05"W
74.45'
S2°09'00"E
40.57'
S1°27'20"E
29.53'
416.
N0°31'25"W 2002.75'
72'
S11°06'02"E
48.39'
3.44'
MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 2)
N0°58'13"E 1171.89'
S31°20'44"E
133.61'
BCS EAST LAND
INVESTMENTS, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001611950
L.R.C.C.T.
J.G. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 938
F.J. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 939
S1°01'49"W
44.08'
S1°01'49"W
53.43'
140.00'
PLANO ROAD
S21°14'37"E
66.60'
S0°58'13"W 1044.01'
5/8" IRSC
LOT 1, BLOCK C
52.603 ACRES
2,291,366 SQ. FT.
S7°13'45"W
64.03'
OWENS
BOULEVARD
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5
(140' R.O.W.)
PLANO ROAD
N0°18'59"W
S19°05'40"E
58.80'
140.00'
BCS WEST LAND
INVESTMENTS, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001611880
L.R.C.C.T.
60' BUILDING
SETBACK
S19°05'40"E
48.53'
5/8" IRSC
BCS MF I, LLC
INST. NO. 20121017001322630
L.R.C.C.T.
FORD
S4°08'33"E
82.73'
S21°14'37"E
72.29'
N45°35'38"W
14.09'
STONEBORO
40' PARKING STRUCTURE
& LANDSCPE SETBACK
S4°08'33"E
54.82'
N0°58'13"E
774.59'
Copyright © 2013
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved
BROADMOOR
SITE
5' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
S12°40'37"W
53.68'
S7°13'45"W
66.02'
J.G. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 938
J.V. VANCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 942
ROAD
RENNER
10' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20080609000694220
L.R.C.C.T.
S12°40'37"W
68.87'
100' D. P. & L. EASEMENT
VOL. 584, PG. 328
D.R.C.C.T.
VARIABLE WIDTH
LONE STAR GAS
EASEMENT
VOL. 617, PG. 156
D.R.C.C.T.
10' SAN. SEWER EASEMENT
INST. NO. 96-0085149
L.R.C.C.T.
TURNPIKE
WREN
S13°08'45"W
101.38'
BUSH
190
N85°39'47"E
126.84'
N85°39'47"E
S85°39'47"W 126.57'
126.24'
42.87'
GEORGE
WA
S0°36'25"W
94.11'
40' PARKING STRUCTURE
& LANDSCPE SETBACK
60' BUILDING
SETBACK
PRESIDENT
AM
22.36'
N0°30'08"W
68.31'
S88°15'53"E 300.10'
S88°15'53"E 298.31'
REEK
35.65'
20' BUILDING &
LANDSCAPE SETBACK
80
)
(UP
43.49'
S46°51'31"W
61.48'
ND P 18
LA , L 1
T TS 016
ES N 0
W E 18 .
S TM 212 .T
BC VES 01 .C.C
2
IN O. L.R
.N
ST
IN
75
5/8"IRSC
7'
N85°39'47"E 191.4
5/8" IRSC
CMF
N.T.S.
PARKWAY
PLANO
S78°33'27"E
147.51'
VARIABLE WIDTH
LONE STAR GAS
EASEMENT
VOL. 3780, PG. 311
L.R.C.C.T.
5/8" IRSC
VICINITY MAP
S78°33'27"E
64.78'
S86°51'32"E 800.00
'
DH
5'
.7
WIN
S86°51'32"E
800.00'
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 450
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 468
38
140.00'
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 442
VOLUME 3189, PAGE 372
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 468
(STATE HIGHWAY NO. 190)
(VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.)
CMF
FOXC
CMF
DART
.7
61
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
HIGHWAY
S88°55'32"E
200.27'
PLANO ROAD
S82°55'01"E
100.32'
BDF
"TXDOT"
S0°18'59"E
68.51'
L12
BCS OFFICE INVESTMENTS ONE, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001612010
L.R.C.C.T.
8'
5/8" IRSC
S86°57'17"E
617.30'
N: 7052584.5140
E: 2520583.3473
CMF
N46°51'31"E
102.48'
92.15'
S0°36'25"W
5/8" IRFC
(ILLEGIBLE)
(C.M.)
5/8" IRSC
5/8" IRSC
60' BUILDING
SETBACK
S86°46'31"E
64.62'
5/8" IRSC
=66°30'20"
R=140.00'
L=162.50'
CB=S34°53'52"E
C=153.53'
10' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20080609000694220
L.R.C.C.T.
5/8" IRSC
S18
0"E
°27'2
10' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20080609000694210
L.R.C.C.T.
5/8" IRSC
M DRIVE
INFOCOR.O.
W.)
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
C1
132°43'52"
25.00'
57.91'
N19°55'48"W
45.81'
C2
93°01'59"
25.00'
40.59'
S49°25'15"E
36.28'
C3
87°48'36"
60.00'
91.95'
N45°02'40"E
83.22'
C4
80°17'27"
23.70'
33.21'
N47°36'55"E
30.56'
C5
2°14'51"
1263.50'
49.57'
S74°37'43"W
49.56'
LINE TABLE
LINE TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
N01°01'01"W
16.66'
L78
S87°45'38"W
27.12'
L2
N11°39'22"W
5.07'
L79
S84°03'46"W
56.81'
L3
N89°12'09"E
15.27'
L81
N04°18'26"E
127.75'
L4
S11°39'22"E
5.07'
L84
S43°09'09"W
21.66'
S40°50'13"E
21.69'
L85
S87°49'54"E
99.14'
L8
S85°30'00"E
60.06'
L86
S42°49'59"E
16.80'
L9
N04°30'00"E
46.94'
L88
N42°49'59"W
4.37'
L10
S40°50'13"E
34.04'
L89
N87°49'54"W
93.73'
L11
S85°30'00"E
66.22'
L90
S02°10'03"W
24.24'
L7
R.O.W. DEDICATION
6.926 ACRES
301,676 SQ. FT.
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
87' R.O.W.
16'
L2
=40°14'11"
R=937.50'
L=658.37'
CB=N1°39'46"E
C=644.92'
L3
=39°06'20"
R=1156.50'
=39°06'20"
R=1200.00'
L=789.34'
L=819.03'
CB=N88°52'14"W
CB=N88°52'14"W
C=774.10'
C=803.22'
N63°46'49"E
68.32'
S69
°19'
03"E
135.
S69
CIT
57'
5 6 5. 4 7 '
7.5'x15'
U.E.
108.
LOT 1C, BLOCK A
GALATYN PARK NORTH
INST. NO. 20110921010001880
L.R.C.C.T.
466.
24'
°19'
YLIN 03"E 517.
E D 01'
°19'
03"W
RIV
466.
E
BRACEBRIDGE
CORPORATION
VOL. 5479, PG. 6838
L.R.C.C.T.
N69
5'x15' U.E.
93.52'
24'
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
13.42'
5/8" IRSC
82.4
8'
10' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
10' TXU ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY
VOL. 4715 PG. 2650
L.R.C.C.T.
=21°48'34"
R=762.50'
L=290.24'
CB=S10°52'35"W
N43°55'28"E
C=288.49'
46.68'
N89°20'56"E 749.65'
RENNER ROAD
S29°00'07"E
52.91'
L96
N00°59'53"E
24.26'
13.50'
L97
N29°00'07"W
L15
N04°30'00"E
15.00'
L98
N54°22'59"E
47.33'
L16
S85°30'00"E
18.74'
L99
N89°00'07"W
15.00'
L17
N60°58'13"E
215.79'
L100
N00°59'53"E
20.24'
5/8" IRSC
S60°58'13"W
214.32'
L101
N46°50'51"W
15.00'
.13
251
E
'52"W
AN
°46
ML
.W.)
(85'
S43°32'45"E
24.94'
L102
N43°09'09"E
25.68'
L20
N43°32'45"W
15.64'
L103
N87°49'57"W
15.00'
L21
N46°27'15"E
15.00'
L104
N02°10'03"E
18.03'
L23
N10°15'51"W
11.49'
L105
N00°58'13"E
20.98'
L24
N73°09'09"E
89.74'
L106
S03°32'16"E
20.36'
L25
S73°09'09"W
95.49'
L30
N00°49'14"W
39.68'
L31
N44°22'17"E
18.27'
L32
N89°20'56"E
69.16'
L35
N59°33'55"E
37.19'
L37
S00°51'43"E
35.00'
L38
N89°08'17"E
L39
S00°51'43"E
35.00'
L40
S41°58'30"W
103.50'
L41
S19°55'01"E
34.50'
L44
S39°04'47"W
113.05'
L46
S47°34'54"W
39.05'
L49
80.00'
S47°34'54"W
87.82'
L51
S39°04'47"W
66.68'
L54
S19°55'01"E
69.77'
L55
S41°58'30"W
71.42'
L56
S89°31'13"W
84.81'
L57
N30°09'03"W
92.96'
L62
S02°16'13"W
51.88'
L64
S61°11'49"W
89.34'
L65
S35°47'34"W
32.68'
L66
N47°34'54"E
L67
N17°36'14"E
29.58'
L68
S01°01'01"E
18.13'
L69
S86°17'44"E
108.15'
L70
S46°26'08"W
59.46'
L71
S53°58'28"W
84.37'
L74
S08°22'17"E
94.98'
L75
S16°03'37"W
24.03'
LOT 9
F E S SI O N O
Y
S U R VE
THENCE with the north right-of-way line of East Renner Road, the following courses and distances, to wit:
South 89°20'56" West, a distance of 2020.45 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 89°10'46" West, a distance of 681.41 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
North 83°56'47" West, a distance of 100.26 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 89°10'46" West, a distance of 350.00 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the
southeast corner of a corner clip at the intersection of the north right-of-way line of East Renner Road and the east
right-of-way line of State Highway No. 5 ( Plano Parkway, a 140-foot wide public right-of-way);
§
§
BEFORE me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared Dana Brown,
known to me to be the person or persons whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same in the capacity herein stated and the act and deed of said company.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this 16th day of May, 2013.
THENCE with the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 5, North 00°26'05" West, a distance of 1313.04 feet to a
5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
THENCE continuing with the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 5, North 00°18'59" West, a distance of 653.65
feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the southwest corner of a corner clip at the intersection of the
east right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 5 (also known as Plano Road) and the south right-of-way line of State
Highway No. 190 (President George Bush Highway, a variable width public right-of-way);
_______________________________________________________
TAKESIA TATE
Notary Public in and for Dallas County, Texas
My Commission Expires: October 2013
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN
CITY OF RICHARDSON
THENCE with said corner clip, North 45°35'38" West, a distance of 14.09 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped
"KHA" set for corner;
THENCE with said corner clip, North 46°51'31" East, a distance of 102.48 feet to a TxDOT monument found for corner;
THENCE with the south right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 190, South 86°57'17" East, passing at a distance of
204.20 feet, the northwest corner of said 1.058 acre tract, continuing for a total distance of 617.30 feet to a TxDOT
monument found for corner ;
§
§
§
THENCE continuing with the south right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 190, the following courses and distances,
to wit:
That, BCS East Land Investments, L.P., being the owner of the hereinafter described property, acting by and through its duly
authorized agent, do hereby adopt this plat designating the herein described property as GALATYN PARK NORTH, an addition to the
City of Richardson. Collin County, Texas. I do hereby dedicate, in fee simple, to the public use forever the streets and alleys shown
thereon. The easements shown thereon are hereby reserved for purposes as indicated. The utility access and fire lane easements shall
be open to the public, fire and police units, garbage and rubbish collection agencies, and all public and private utilities for each particular
use. The maintenance of paving on the utility, access and fire lane easements is the responsibility of the property owner. No buildings,
fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths shall be constructed, reconstructed, or replaced upon, over or across the
easements as shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using or
desiring to use the same. All, and any public utility shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any buildings, fences,
trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance or efficiency
of its respective system on the easements, and all public utilities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to and from
said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting. patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parts
of its respective systems without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. Any public utility shall have the right of
ingress and egress to private property for the purpose of reading meters and any maintenance and service required or ordinarily
performed by that utility.
This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations. and resolutions of the City of Richardson. Texas.
I do hereby dedicate the mutual access easements shown for use by the public as a means of pedestrian and vehicle access to the
property shown thereon and to the adjacent property thereon.
This plat is approved by the City Plan Commission of the City of Richardson, Texas and accepted by the Owner, subject to the following
conditions, which shall be binding upon the Owner, his heirs, grantees, successors and assigns:
The creek(s) or drainage channel(s) within the limits of this plat will remain as an open channel at all times and will be maintained by
the abutting Property Owner(s). The City of Richardson will not be responsible for the maintenance and operation of said creek(s) or
channel(s) or for any damage to private property or persons that results from the flow of water along said creek(s) or channel(s), or
for the control of erosion.
The limits of the creek(s) and/or drainage channel(s) are defined by the Floodway and
Drainage easement line, as shown on this plat.
No obstruction to the natural flow of storm water run-off shall be permitted by filling or by construction of any type of dam, building,
bridge, fence, walkway, or any other structure within the creek(s) or drainage channel(s) as defined by the Floodway and Drainage
Easement. Provided, however, it is understood that in the event it becomes necessary for the City of Richardson to erect any type of
drainage structure in order to improve the storm drainage that may be occasioned by the streets and alleys in or adjacent to the
subdivision, then in such event, the City of Richardson shall have the right to enter upon the Floodway and Drainage easement at
any point, or points, to erect, construct, and maintain any drainage facility deemed necessary for drainage purposes. The abutting
property owner(s) shall keep the creek(s) and/or drainage channel(s) traversing or adjacent to his property clean and free of debris,
silt and any substance which would result in unsanitary conditions, and the City of Richardson shall have the right of ingress and
egress for the purpose of inspection and supervision of maintenance work by the property owner to alleviate any undesirable
conditions which may occur.
The creek(s) or drainage channel(s), as in the case of all open channels, are subject to storm water overflow and natural bank
erosion to an extent which cannot be definitely defined. The City of Richardson shall not be liable for any damages of any nature
resulting from the occurrence of these natural phenomena, nor resulting from the failure of any structure or structures, within or
adjacent to the creek(s) or drainage channel(s).
South 82°55'01" East, a distance of 100.32 feet to a TxDOT monument found for corner;
South 88°55'32" East, a distance of 200.27 feet to a TxDOT monument found for corner;
South 86°51'32" East, a distance of 800.00 feet to a TxDOT monument found for corner;
South 78°33'27" East, a distance of 212.29 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
North 85°39'47" East, a distance of 191.47 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 88°15'53" East, a distance of 300.10 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 84°03'54" East, a distance of 100.15 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 89°13'05" East, a distance of 100.13 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 86°46'31" East, a distance of 65.91 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 83°03'40" East, a distance of 193.02 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for corner;
South 86°52'31" East, a distance of 215.52 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the beginning
of a curve to the right in the west right-of-way line of Wyndham Lane (a 85-foot wide public right-of-way) dedicated
to the City of Richardson according to the plat Right-of-Way Dedication-Galatyn Park North, recorded in Cabinet L,
Page 618 of the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas;
THENCE leaving the south right-of-way line of State Highway No. 190, with the west right-of-way line of Wyndham Lane,
southeasterly, with said curve to the right, through a central angle of 66°30'20", having a radius of 140.00 feet, and a
chord bearing and distance of South 34°53'52" East, 153.53 feet, an arc length of 162.50 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with
cap stamped "KHA" set for the beginning of a reverse curve to the left;
THENCE with the west right-of-way line of Wyndham Lane, the following courses and distances, to wit:
Southerly, with said curve to the left, through a central angle of 16°48'38", having a radius of 842.50 feet, and a
chord bearing and distance of South 10°03'01" East, 246.30 feet, an arc length of 247.19 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod
with cap stamped "KHA" set for the end of the curve;
South 18°27'20" East, a distance of 229.45 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the beginning
of a curve to the right;
Southerly, with said curve to the right, through a central angle of 40°14'11", having a radius of 957.50 feet, and a
chord bearing and distance of South 01°39'46" West, 658.68 feet, an arc length of 672.41 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod
with cap stamped "KHA" set for the end of the curve;
South 21°46'52" West, a distance of 251.13 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the beginning
of a curve to the left;
Southerly, with said curve to the left, through a central angle of 21°48'34", having a radius of 742.50 feet, and a
chord bearing and distance of South 10°52'35" West, 280.93 feet, an arc length of 282.63 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod
with cap stamped "KHA" set for the end of the curve;
South 00°01'42" East, a distance of 60.63 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with cap stamped "KHA" set for the northeast
corner of a corner clip at the intersection of the west right-of-way line of said Wyndham Lane and the north
right-of-way line of said East Renner Road;
THENCE with said corner clip, South 43°55'28" West, a distance of 35.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
containing 147.516 acres or 6,425,794 square feet of land.
All bearings shown are relative to grid north of the Texas Coordinate System of 1983 based on the City of Richardson
control monument system (North Central Zone 4202). All dimensions shown are ground distances.
EXECUTED THIS _______________, day of ________________________________, 2013.
By: BCS East Land Investments, L.P.
By: _________________________________________
The purpose of this plat is to create 4 lots, 2 open space lots,
and dedicate right-of-way and easements for the 147 acres of
unplatted land.
Printed Name: ______________________________________
GALATYN PARK NORTH
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK B
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK C
OPEN SPACE LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK X
Title: _______________________________________
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
§
§
BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared
BEING A FINAL PLAT OF
147.516 ACRES / 6,425,794 SQ. FT.
FROM THE F.J. VANCE SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 939
CITY OF RICHARDSON
COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
________________________________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN, UNDER MY HAND SEAL OF OFFICE this the ____________, day of ______________________, 2012.
5/8" IRSC
_____________________________________
Notary Public in and for Dallas County, Texas
S43°55'28"W
35.04'
P.O.B.
LOT 10
D
78.22'
N0°39'04"W
55.00'
LOT 8
N
5336
58.67'
L19
S0°01'42"E
60.63'
20' ALLEY
BLOCK 3
WHITE CHAPEL PHASE 1B
CAB. G, SLIDE 8517
M.R.C.C.T.
L95
106.14'
N85°30'00"W
5/8" IRSC
N89°20'56"E 2020.37'
TO SWC F.J. VANCE SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 939
(VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.)
LOT 3, BLOCK A
GALATYN PARK NORTH
INST. NO. 20110808010001450
L.R.C.C.T.
=21°48'34"
R=742.50'
L=282.63'
CB=S10°52'35"W
C=280.93'
N43°55'28"E
43.77'
S89°20'56"W 1244.40'
Copyright © 2013
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved
S21
=21°48'34"
R=757.50'
L=288.34'
CB=S10°52'35"W
C=286.60'
INST. NO. 20101004001065480
L.R.C.C.T.
LOT 4
HA
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
35' WATER EASEMENT
60' BUILDING
INST. NO. 20101004001065480
SETBACK
L.R.C.C.T.
30' WATER EASEMENT
LOT 3
WY
5/8" IRSC
40' LANDSCAPE
SETBACK
LOT 2
ND
5' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
RICHARDSON PDC 2 LP
INST. NO. 20110721000759240
L.R.C.C.T.
R.O
S21°46'52"W
168.65'
N21°46'52"E
251.13'
N21°46'52"E
251.13'
BCS EAST LAND
INVESTMENTS, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001611950
L.R.C.C.T.
N78°05'56"E
25.63'
'
N22°24'56"W
71.74'
LOT 2, BLOCK B
22.891 ACRES
997,131 SQ. FT.
170.49'
S04°30'00"W
L14
L18
=40°14'11"
R=957.50'
L=672.41'
CB=S1°39'46"W
C=658.68'
U.E.
4 2 5 . 71
'
N04°30'00"E
L13
L12
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
CIRCLE
DELTA
(85'
=39°06'20"
R=1243.50'
L=848.72'
CB=S88°52'14"E
C=832.34'
LOT 1
NO.
SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC
INST. NO. 2006060800078110
L.R.C.C.T.
=40°14'11"
R=942.50'
L=661.88'
CB=N1°39'46"E
C=648.36'
L4
200
CURVE TABLE
229
20' BUILDING
SETBACK
BCS EAST LAND
INVESTMENTS, LP
INST. NO. 20121218001611950
L.R.C.C.T.
E
LAN
AM
ND(8H5' R.O.W.)
.45'
S18°27'20"E
229.45'
S18°27'20"E
229.45'
100
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
LOT 3,BLOCK A
THE SHIRE PHASE 2
INST. NO. 20070726010002450
L.R.C.C.T.
WY
5' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
LOT 2, BLOCK C
30.495 ACRES
1,328,367 SQ. FT.
50
1" = 100' @ 24X36
=16°48'38"
R=842.50'
L=247.19'
CB=S10°03'01"E
C=246.30'
=16°48'37"
R=857.50'
L=251.59'
CB=S10°03'01"E
C=250.69'
=16°48'37"
R=862.50'
L=253.05'
CB=S10°03'01"E
C=252.15'
0
100
RO
WHEREAS BCS East Land Investments, L.P., is the owner of a tract of land situated in the F.J. Vance Survey,
Abstract No. 939, in the City of Richardson, Collin County, Texas, and being all of a tract of land described in a Special
Warranty Deed to BCS East Land Investments, L.P., recorded in Document No. 20121218001611950 of the Land
Records of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of a corner clip at the intersection of the north right-of-way line of East Renner
Road (a variable width right-of-way) and the west right-of-way line of West Wyndham Lane (a 85-foot wide public
right-of-way) at a 5/8-inch iron rod with a cap stamped "KHA" set for the POINT OF BEGINNING ;
DANA BROWN
LA
=64°59'20"
R=120.00'
L=136.12'
CB=N34°08'22"W
C=128.94'
Dana Brown
Registered Professional Land
Surveyor No. 5336
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75251
Ph. 972-770-1300
dana.brown@kimley-horn.com
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
P
40' PARKING STRUCTURE
& LANDSCPE SETBACK
___________________________________
LOT 1,BLOCK A
THE SHIRE PHASE 2
INST. NO. 20070726010002450
L.R.C.C.T.
SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC
INST. NO. 2006060800078110
L.R.C.C.T.
S83°03'40"E
193.04' S83°03'40"E
193.03'
10' ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
COMPANY LLC EASEMENT
INST. NO. 20080609000694220
L.R.C.C.T.
S89°13'05"E
100.17'
MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 1)
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 468
S86°52'31"E 213.47'
S86°52'31"E 212.76'
S84°03'54"E
100.28'
S84°03'54"E
100.32'
O F TE
X
TE
TA REGISTERED
AS
5/8" IRSC
§
§
§
LEGEND:
D.E. = DRAINAGE EASEMENT
D.&U.E. = DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
U.E. = UTILITY EASEMENT
= CENTRAL ANGLE
P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCING
P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING
IRSC = 5/8" IRON ROD W/ "KHA" CAP SET
C.M. = CONTROLLING MONUMENT
_____________________________________
Printed Name
___________________
My commission expires:
ENGINEER:
Kimley-Horn and Assoicates, Inc.
12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75251
972-770-1300
Contact : Brad Moss, P.E.
OWNER/APPLICANT:
BCS East Land Investments, L.P.
4801 West Lovers Lane
Dallas, Texas 75225
214-739-5553
ATTN: Joe Altemore
jaltemore@gmail.com
12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75251
FIRM # 101155-00
Tel. No. (972) 770-1300
Fax No. (972) 239-3820
Scale
Drawn by
Checked by
Date
Project No.
Sheet No.
1" = 100'
SRD
DAB
OCT. 2012
068527002
2 OF 2
5/16/2013 1:26 PM
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 442
VOLUME 3189, PAGE 372
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 468
VOLUME 3394, PAGE 450
=65°24'07"
R=125.00'
L=142.69'
CB=N34°20'46"W
C=135.07'
5/8" IRSC
5/8" IRSC
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN
CITY OF RICHARDSON
PLOTTED BY DUNN, STACY 5/17/2013 9:17 AM LAST SAVED
S86°52'31"E
215.52'
5/8" IRSC
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, Dana Brown, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that I prepared this plat from an actual
on the ground survey of the land and that the monuments shown thereon were found and/or placed under my personal supervision in
accordance with Platting Rules and regulations of the City Planning Commission of the City of Richardson, Texas.
(STATE HIGHWAY NO. 190)
(VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.)
AL
S83°03'40"E
193.02'
R
S86°46'31"E
65.91'
S
S89°13'05"E
100.13'
S84°03'54"E
100.15'
DWG NAME: K:\DAL_SURVEY\068176014-KDC GUAPO\DWG\068176014-GALATYN PARK FINAL PLAT.DWG
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
HIGHWAY
60' BUILDING
SETBACK
Agenda Item 3 Replat:
Bush Central Station Addition (Lots 1 and 2, Block D) City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet Bush Central Station Addition
Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1, Block B; and, Lot 1, Block C
Attachments:
1. Locator
2. Final plat staff report
3. Final plat
N Plano Rd
DA
RT
Lig
ht R
ail
Lot 1, Blk C
7.634 acres
Peloton Drive ROW
Existing
Routh Creek
Parkway ROW
enner Rd
E Renner Rd
Lot 1, Blk A
5.141 acres
Marathon
Avenue
ROW
Lot 1, Block A / Lot 1, Block B / Lot 1, Block C
Bush Central Station Addition
Lot 1, Blk B
4.153 acres
This product is for informational purposes and may not have
been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying
purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and
represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries.
4
CITY PLAN COMMISSION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
May 21, 2013
Final Plat
PROJECT SUMMARY
Subdivision:
Lot 1, Block A
Lot 1, Block B
Lot 1, Block C
Staff Comments:
Bush Central Station Addition, Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1,
Block B; and Lot 1, Block C.
1125 E. Renner Road
1225 E. Renner Road
3451 N. Plano Road
The northwest corner of Renner Road and Plano Road.
The purpose of the final plat is to dedicate right-of-way and
to create three (3) lots for future development. On proposed
Lot 1, Block A, two (2) four-story multi-family buildings
totaling 276 units with a parking garage will be constructed.
Lot 1, Block B will contain two (2) three-story multi-family
buildings totaling 111 units, and four (4) three-story
townhome buildings totaling 16 units.
No development is proposed on Lot 1, Block C at this time.
The final plat complies with City zoning and development
regulations.
CPC Action:
Final decision
BACKGROUND
Tract Size:
18.96-acres (835,998 square feet)
Zoning:
Planned Development under Ordinance #3806
Right-of-way Dedication:
2.034-acres of right-of-way which includes:
10’ for Renner Road,
75’ for Marathon Avenue,
39’ for Peloton Drive.
Easements/Setbacks:
Existing to Remain
30’ Water easement along Renner Road
15’ Sanitary sewer easement along Plano Road.
Page 1 of 2
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
X:\Development (new)\Development Plan Files\Subdivision Files\Bush Central Station Addition\Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1, Block B; and Lot 1,
Block C\Minutes and Staff Reports\2013-05-21 CPC\Final Plat (SMS).doc
Dedicated by this Plat
Two 42’ wide street easements on each side of Marathon
Avenue for slip roads along Renner Road,
Various pedestrian easements in accordance with ordinance
3806:
12’ along Peloton Drive,
14’ along Marathon Avenue,
15’ on Lot 1, Block B along Plano Road and the
proposed slip roads,
18’ on Lot 1, Block A along Routh Creek Parkway,
21.5’ along Renner Road.
Various franchise, utility and drainage easements to serve the
proposed developments on the site.
Abandoned by this Plat
None.
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item 4 Replat:
Bush Central Station Addition (Lot 1, Block A; Lot 1, Block B; and Lot 1, Block C) City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet Bush Central Station Addition
Lots 1 and 2, Block D
Attachments:
1. Locator
2. Final Plat Staff Report
3. Final Plat
Dr
Dr
Rou
th E
ast
Rou
th W
est
CityLine Drive ROW
RT
Lig
ht R
a il
Routh Creek Parkway ROW
N Plano Rd
Lot 2
1.591-acres
DA
CityLine Drive ROW
Lot 1
3.405-acres
W Renner Rd
Lots 1 & 2, Block D
Bush Central Station Addition
E Renner Rd
This product is for informational purposes and may not have
been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying
purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and
represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries.
4
CITY PLAN COMMISSION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
May 21, 2013
Final Plat
PROJECT SUMMARY
Subdivision:
Lot 1, Block D
Lot 2, Block D
Staff Comments:
Bush Central Station Addition
Lots 1 and 2, Block D
3451 Routh Creek Parkway
3551 Routh Creek Parkway
North of Renner Road, west of the future extension of Routh
Creek Parkway
The purpose of the final plat is to dedicate right-of-way for
CityLine Drive (formerly Infocom Drive) and Routh Creek
Parkway, and create two (2) lots for future development.
The final plat complies with City zoning and development
regulations.
CPC Action:
Final decision
BACKGROUND
Tract Size:
7.612-acres (331,572 square feet)
Zoning:
(PD) Planned Development under Ordinance #3806
Right-of-way Dedication:
2.616-acres are dedicated for CityLine Drive (formerly
Infocom Drive) and Routh Creek Parkway.
Easements/Setbacks:
Existing to Remain
Dedicated by this Plat
10’ sanitary sewer easement along Plano Road;
Dallas Area Rapid Transit right-of-way easement on the
north side of the site (encompassed by the right-of-way
dedication for CityLine Drive).
Two variable width drainage easements on proposed Lot 1,
Block D;
15’ utility easement on proposed Lot 1, Block D.
Abandoned by this Plat
None
Page 1 of 1
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
X:\Development (new)\Development Plan Files\Subdivision Files\Bush Central Station Addition\Lots 1&2, Block D\Minutes and Staff
Reports\2013-05-21 CPC\Final Plat.doc
Agenda Item 5 Zoning File 13‐11: Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance City of Richardson, Texas ▪ City Plan Commission ▪ May 21, 2013 Meeting Packet ZONING FILE 13-11
Attachments:
1. Staff Report
2. Proposed PD Regulations (Exhibit “A”)
X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2013\ZF 13-11 CZO PD Text Amendment\2013-05-21 CPC Packet Info\ZF 1311 Attachment List.docx
Staff Report
TO:
City Plan Commission
FROM:
Chris Shacklett, Senior Planner CS
DATE:
May 17, 2013
RE:
Zoning File 13-11: Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) Text Amendments
– PD Planned Development Regulations
REQUEST:
A City-initiated amendment to Article XXI-C, PD Planned Development regulations, including
revisions to the intent, use regulations, building regulations, area regulations, parking regulations
and PD review procedures.
BACKGROUND:
The CZO contains a zoning district designation of PD Planned Development that currently
allows for the creation of flexible zoning and development regulations for large tracts of land.
The flexibility is typically in terms of density, building placement, and mixing of uses. Some
examples of developments with PD zoning include Brick Row, Eastside, II Creeks, along with
various single-family and multi-family developments throughout the City.
The current regulations require a minimum 10-acre tract of land for an applicant to request a PD
zoning designation. However, as the City of Richardson becomes more fully built out, additional
flexibility in the minimum acreage requirement is desirable due to the likely predominant nature
of development in the future, specifically redevelopment of smaller properties and infill
development. Also, the current PD regulations provide a list of specific uses, building materials,
and maximum residential density requirements that are considered base regulations for every PD
District; however, many of the City’s Planned Development Districts are modified through the
zoning process to allow modifications to these regulations. Other regulations such as height,
setback, lot cover, and floor area ratio are unique to each PD and are approved as part of the
zoning request.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
Broadly, the purpose of the proposed amendments is to create the opportunity to craft
development standards that can be uniquely tailored to be context sensitive to a significantly
greater degree than current regulations provide. More specifically, future PD Planned
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Development requests would establish the particular allowed uses, building materials, height,
density, setbacks, and other development regulations most appropriate for a given property.
Additionally, it is proposed that the requirement for a minimum land area of ten (10) acres for a
PD Planned Development be eliminated.
The removal of the minimum acreage requirement would allow for an applicant to request a PD
Planned Development zoning district classification for a property that may not be able to be
developed under current base zoning district regulations. In particular, small tracts of land that
may be suitable for redevelopment may be most appropriately developed through the use of a
unique set of development guidelines not provided for by any one (1) base zoning district.
The amendment would substantially expand the opportunities for property owners to request a
PD zoning designation. As with any zoning request, public hearings before the City Plan
Commission and City Council would still be required before any change could be approved.
Other proposed amendments to the PD regulations include changes to the intent, use regulations,
building regulations, area regulations, parking regulations, and the planned development review
procedure. The list below highlights the major changes to each section and identifies how each
amendment allows more flexibility for both the City and applicant:
•
•
•
•
Use Regulations
o Remove list of approved uses for every PD district and required the specific list of
approved uses to be specified in the applicant’s PD request.
 For PD districts approved prior to this text amendment, the existing list of
uses would still be the approved uses for those districts, unless otherwise
specified in the district’s specific PD ordinance.
Building Regulations
o Revise the language to require a minimum 85% masonry construction consistent
with many other zoning districts and allow other materials and percentages as
requested in the PD application.
Area Regulations
o Remove the minimum 10-acre area requirement for PD requests.
o Remove the 12 dwelling unit per acre residential density requirement.
 For PD districts approved prior to this text amendment, the maximum 12
du/acre requirement would remain, unless otherwise specified in the
district’s specific PD ordinance.
Planned Development Review Procedure
o Revise requirements related to the level of detail required as part of the required
traffic impact analysis.
o Remove the requirement for a conceptual drainage plan.
 A plan could still be required depending on the application but would not
be a requirement for every PD request.
o Remove requirement for analysis of compliance with area and parking
regulations.
 This can be accommodated through the required applicant’s statement and
concept plan.
X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2013\ZF 13-11 CZO PD Text Amendment\2013-05-21 CPC Packet Info\ZF 1311 Staff Report.doc
2
o Remove requirement for explanation of landscape and maintenance for all open
space and drainage areas.
 This can be accommodated through the required applicant’s statement and
concept plan.
SUMMARY:
The proposed amendments to the PD Planned Development section of the CZO potentially
impacts future development within the City in multiple ways, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Providing for greater context sensitivity;
Providing increased flexibility for allowable uses, site layout, and building design and
materials;
Facilitating incremental redevelopment;
Facilitating infill development;
Providing for a broader range of development types, residential, non-residential, and
mixed-use; and
Providing better responsiveness to changing markets.
Additionally, the proposed amendments preserve the complete legislative discretion City Council
enjoys when considering and acting on any zoning change request. The statutory requirement for
public hearings before the City Plan Commission and City Council would still be required as
with any other zoning change request. Furthermore, the CPC and Council would be provided
with a greater level of control to the extent desired on a case-by-case basis. Lastly, all existing
PD’s would remain unchanged as a result of the proposed amendments.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Correspondence: CZO text amendments do not require mailed notices.
Motion:
The Commission will be making a recommendation to the City Council regarding this
request.
Should the CPC recommend approval of the request, the motion should be made as
follows:
Article XXI-C, PD Planned Development regulations shall be revised per the attached
Exhibit “A” (Proposed PD Regulations)
Council Hearing Date: The City Council hearing date is June 10, 2013.
X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2013\ZF 13-11 CZO PD Text Amendment\2013-05-21 CPC Packet Info\ZF 1311 Staff Report.doc
3
Exhibit “A”
Article XXI-C.
PD Planned Development District Regulations
Sec. 011. Intent.
The PD Planned Development District is intended to allow the development of large tracts of
land in a manner that will allow more flexibility than traditional zoning districts in terms of
density, placement of buildings and structures, and mix of uses. A planned development district
should provide for the integrity and maintenance of drainageways, wetlands, and other natural
features and preserve usable open space and landscape features.
Generally, planned developments should be adjacent to or near major transportation arteries
(such as freeways, expressways, turnpikes or mass transit routes). Inasmuch as possible,
planned developments should be separated or well buffered from adjacent properties. Prior to
approval of a planned development, it must be demonstrated that adequate public services and
infrastructure capacity exists or is planned with the development schedule of the project, to
support the proposed planned development.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84; Ord. No. 3377-A, § 1, 1-14-02)
Sec. 12. Use regulations.
The list of approved uses for a specific PD Planned Development District shall be specifically
requested in the PD Planned Development application.
For all PD Planned Development Districts approved prior to mm-dd-yyyy, In the PD Planned
Development District, no land shall be used and no building shall be erected or converted to any
use other than, unless otherwise specified:
(1)
Antenna, accessory, subject to the supplemental regulations of article XXII-E.
(2)
Antenna, commercial, subject to the supplemental regulations of article XXII-E.
(3)
Antenna, freestanding, subject to the supplemental regulations of article XXII-E.
(4)
Antenna, mounted, subject to the supplemental regulations of article XXII-E.
(5)
Bakery.
(6)
Bank or financial institution.
(7)
Barber or beauty salon.
(8)
Book, card, or stationery store.
(9)
Camera and photographic supply shop.
(10) Catering service.
(11) Church.
(12) Clothing or apparel store.
(13) Construction field office.
(14) Convenience store with a maximum area of 2,500 square feet.
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
City of Richardson, Texas
Article XXI-C
PD Planned Development District Regulations
(15) Department store.
(16) Drugstore or pharmacy.
(17) Florist.
(18) Furniture, home furnishings, and appliance store.
(19) Health club.
(20) Hotel, full-service.
(21) Incidental retail, restaurant, and personal service activities in an office building subject to
the supplemental regulations of article XXII-E.
(22) Jewelry store.
(23) Laundry pick-up station.
(24) Mailing service.
(25) Movie theater.
(26) Office.
(27) Office furniture, equipment and supply store.
(28) Parking lot, accessory.
(29) Parking lot or garage, commercial off-street.
(30) Photography or art studio.
(31) Print shop, minor.
(32) Private recreation club.
(33) Public building.
(34) Radio, recording or television studio.
(35) Research laboratories and facilities.
(36) Residential uses, including single-family detached and attached dwellings, patio homes,
duplexes, townhomes, and apartments.
(37) Restaurant without drive-through or curb service.
(38) School, parochial, when located on the same lot as the church of the sponsoring religious
agency.
(39) Tailor shop.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84; Ord. No. 2715-A, § 6, 2-13-89; Ord. No. 3009-A, § 1F, 2-13-95;
Ord. No. 3063-A, § 1, 2-26-96; Ord. No. 3377-A, § 1, 1-14-02)
Sec. 23. Building regulations.
All buildings shall be a minimum 85%of masonry construction or other approved materials as
requested in the PD Planned Development application.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84)
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
City of Richardson, Texas
Article XXI-C
PD Planned Development District Regulations
Sec. 34. Area requirementsregulations.
(a)
The minimum area requirements for a planned development shall be as follows:
(1) Minimum lot area. The minimum land area for a planned development shall be ten
acres.
(21) Height regulations. The application for a planned development shall contain an
element which specifies the maximum height of structures on each tract of land.
(3) Mixed use setbacks. The setbacks between residential and nonresidential uses shall
be specifically addressed within the application.
(42) Residential density. The maximum density of any residential development within a
planned development shall be 12 dwelling units per gross acre designated for
residential development for PD Planned Development Districts approved prior to
mm-dd-yyyy. PD Planned Development Districts approved after mm-dd-yyyy shall
be requested in the PD Planned Development application.
(b)
The following area regulations shall be specifically enumerated in the PD pPlanned
Ddevelopment application request and, upon approval, shall become a part of the zoning
ordinance for the described property:
(1)
Front yard (measured from all streets, whether public or private).
(2)
Side yard.
(3)
Rear yard.
(4)
Lot coverage.
(5)
Floor area ratio.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84)
Sec. 45. Parking regulations.
Parking shall be provided in accordance with the regulations of Ordinance 205-A of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of Richardson [now Code chapter 16, article V].the Code of Ordinances,
Chapter 21 unless otherwise specified in the PD Planned Development application.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84)
Sec. 56. Planned development review procedure.
(a)
Any application for rezoning of property to the Planned Development (PD) District shall be
accompanied by the following supportive information:
(1)
A conceptual site plan, drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equaling 50 feet,
showingincluding, but not limited to, the major circulation pattern surrounding and
serving the site, major landscaping elements and features, open space,
drainageways and wetlands, parking areas, building groupings and significant
physical features of the site. With respect to residential areas, the proposed density,
lot configuration, circulation and a typical plot plan shall be included in on the
applicationconceptual site plan.
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
City of Richardson, Texas
Article XXI-C
PD Planned Development District Regulations
(2)
A traffic analysis and recommendations prepared by a registered professional
engineer qualified to conduct such studies. Said analysis shall include current traffic
counts for streets surrounding the project, analysis of the existing capacity on those
streets, projections of the amount of traffic that will be generated by the proposed
development, and the ability of the thoroughfare system to absorb the increased
traffic without decreasing the level of service below an acceptable level, which will be
determined by the city plan commission. At the discretion of the Director of
Development Services, these requirements may be reduced or removed.
(3)
A conceptual drainage plan for development of the site indicating impacts of
development on affected drainage basins. Said conceptual information shall include
contour information at not less than two-foot contour intervals and shall also include
information about anticipated quantities of runoff in relation to existing runoff
characteristics. General statements concerning stormwater management techniques
shall also be submitted with the application.
(43) A statement and/or plan indicating how the property relates to surrounding properties
and also indicating what measures will be taken to create appropriate transitions
from the subject property to neighboring tracts.
(5) Analysis of compliance with the area regulations and parking requirements of the
Planned Development District.
(6) Explanation of provisions for the landscaping and maintenance of all open space and
drainage areas.
(74) Any other supportive information the applicant feels may be beneficial to the City of
Richardson in the evaluation of the request.
(b)
No application shall be complete until all of the enumerated data is on file with the city plan
commissionDepartment of Development Services. Upon approval, all of the above
information, as may be amended, shall become a part of the ordinance which zones the
property and as such shall regulate the manner in which development occurs.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84)
Sec. 67. Amendments.
(a)
Minor amendments to a planned development shall be defined as a change which does
not increase the building coverage, floor area ratio or residential density of the planned
development, does not decrease any of the specified area regulations or enumerated
parking ratios, nor substantially changes the access or circulation on or adjacent to the
site.
(b)
In cases of minor amendments to a planned development, the planning commission shall
be authorized to approve such changes upon written application and explanation of the
change by the owner of the property. No further public hearings shall be required.
(c)
Any other change to a planned development shall be considered a change in zoning and
shall be processed through the normal rezoning procedure, requiring public hearings
before the city plan commission and the city council.
(Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, 4-16-84)
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
City of Richardson, Texas
Article XXI-C
PD Planned Development District Regulations
Sec. 7. Reserved.
Editor's note: Ord. No. 3598, § 16, adopted March 26, 2007, repealed § 7, which pertained to
site plan approval and derived from Ord. No. 2418-A, § 9, adopted April 16, 1984; Ord. No.
2816-a, § 29, adopted Jan. 14, 1991; Ord. No. 2872-A, § 7, adopted Feb. 25, 1992; and Ord.
No. 2881-A, § 4, adopted May 11, 1992.
Sec. 8. Reserved.
Editor's note: Ord. No. 3598, § 16, adopted March 26, 2007, repealed § 8, which pertained to
landscape plan approval and derived from Ord. No. 2418-a, § 9, adopted April 16, 1984; Ord.
No. 2816-A, § 29, adopted Jan. 14, 1991; and Ord. No. 2872-A, § 10, adopted Feb. 25, 1992.
End of Article XXI-C
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
City of Richardson, Texas