presentation - Thermo Fisher Scientific

Mexico Perspective : Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in

Breeding Bulls from the State of Chihuahua, Mexico - A Real

Field Working Experience

Ivan Leyva-Baca DVM., MSc., PhD.

Animal Health Product Applications

Life Sciences Solutions

Austin, Texas, USA

The world leader in serving science

2

Background: Bovine Trichomoniasis History and Distribution

• History: Bovine trichomoniasis first reported as a cause of reproductive failure in cattle by Kunstler in france1888. The first report of trichomoniasis in The US in the State of Pennsylvania was in 1932 reported by Emmerson and by 1950s it was well established in US Beef Herds

• Prevalence: All prevalence has been mostly estimated with one sampling and culture/microscopy that varies from 0.18-6% in certain states in the USA. However, an accurate determination of current TF prevalence in the US has not been reported

• Prevalence in Mexico is not known

• Economic Importance: Using TF prevalence data from a survey of bulls passing through an Oklahoma auction market estimated reproductive loss in virgin heifers breed to produce their first calf concluded the cost of Oklahoma cattle industry was from 7.4-20.8 million per year (Williamson, 2009) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAngus-bull-van-buren-tn1.jpg

3

Background: Tritrichomonas foetus Etiology

• Etiology: Tritrichomonas foetus is a spindle to pear-shaped single-celled protozoa with three anterior flagella, an undulating membrane along the length of its body containing an accessory filament at its margin, and a single posterior flagellum.

Vilela RC, Benchimol M. IL-10 release by bovine epithelial cells cultured with Trichomonas vaginalis and Tritrichomonas foetus . Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz . 2013;108(1):110-112. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762013000100018. http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATritrichomonas_foetus.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATritrichomonas_foetus_(259_26)_Cultured.jpg

Background: Tritrichomonas foetus G enome

4

T. foetus genome is divided in five haploid chromosomes

• Genome size ~160 MB

Background: Transmission and Clinical signs

Transmission: is mainly venereal

“This image provided courtesy of Wikimedia Commons & United States Department of Agriculture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Angus_cattle_12.jpg

” https://commons.wikimedia.

org/wiki/File%3AAufreitende r_Stier_2011.JPG

Clinical Signs at Individual Level

Bulls:

• Bulls don’t exhibit any pathologic lesions

The immune response is very limited

• Due to the lack of clinical signs the infected bulls tend to remain actively breeding other cows in untested herds

Cows:

Pyometras (Usually at day 50 post infection) with prolonged infections

Purulent debris in the uterine lumen

• Early embryonic death

• Fetal maceration detected by palpation

Abortion (usually within the 5 th month of gestation)

• Temporary infertility (2-6 months)

• Early return to estrus (Most common clinical sign of T. foetus infection in cows)

5

Clinical Signs at Herd Level:

• Clinical signs on a herd basis are the culmination of clinical signs exhibited by individuals within the herd associated with the parasite’s impact on female reproductive efficiency through increased numbers of non-pregnant cows, pyometras, abortions, and cows pregnant but with a later than normal expected calving date

The early return to estrus is the main clinical sign of trich infection during the breeding period

• Low Calving Rates (30-60%)

• Longer Calving intervals (≤100 days than non-infected herds)

6

Background: Risk factors

• Natural service for breeding

• Extensive range management

• No defined breeding season

• Shared Bulls (Ejidos)

• Ranch/Farm located right next to infected herds

• Commingling of cattle

• Lack of Trich testing

• Low Sensitivity & Specificity Diagnostic techniques

( False Negatives, because The sensitivity of the test is affected by the field conditions (i.e. low number of organisms collected when sampled) handling conditions (i.e. temperature and transit time to laboratory). Fortunately, the sensitivity has increased with the universal acceptance of the DNA – based PCR test )

• Not properly testing the entire battery of bulls (Three consecutive testing of negative in an infected herd must be mandatory)

• Implementing AI from untested bulls (non-reputable source)

• Iatrogenic transfer with improperly sanitized vaginal speculum (very rare)

Management and Control of Bovine Trichomoniasis

• Treatment & Vaccination: There are no legally available drugs or vaccine

to treat affected cattle that are 100% effective

Control: Given that bulls are persistently infected, the cows are transiently infected and its transmission

is strictly venereal, these factors offer the possibility to manage the disease effectively by

focusing on the identification and removal of infected bulls.

• Diagnostics: is the best tool as one of the pieces for control and eradication of trich from infected herds:

7

• Surveillance

• Prevalence of the disease in the zone, evaluation of risk factors and identification of undesired events in the ranch will indicate is tested is required for the entire battery of bulls right after or before breeding season (Pooling is always an option)

Elimination form infected herds

• Test all bulls 3 times with an interval of two weeks and cull all positive bulls

• Cull all bulls (usually too expensive and depends on the market value at the time)

• Cull all unproductive cows that did not generate a calf at the end od the breeding season (open cows and cows that did not give any calves)

• Allow for at least three estrus cycles for the infected cows to clear out the disease (However, some reports indicate that more cycles are required)

• Use Artificial examination and proven negative bulls to avoid reintroduction of trich into the herd

• Prevention

• Biosecurity (Proper fencing)

• Herd records for reproductive performance

• Replacements (bring only tested negative bulls, virgin bulls and heifers) from a reputable ranch

• Reduce the bull battery to minimize the infection rate

• Surveillance strategy based on risk factors

8

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

*González R.E

1 ., Ramírez-Godinez.J.A

1 ., Leal T.B.A

1 ., Lastra G.C

1 ., Ordoñez B.P.L

1 .,

Álvarez G.J.A

1 ., Santellano E.E

1 ., Esparza V.M.E

1 ., Baxter J 2 ., Leyva-Baca. I .

2

1 Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua.

2 Animal Health Group at Thermo Fisher Scientific, Austin, TX

The Situation:

In Mexico and the State of Chihuahua the average calving rate is 55% despite the proper management strategies such as:

• Usage of high quality vaccines against

abortive diseases

Improvement of genetics in their herds

Breeding soundness examinations of bulls

• Cow palpations

• Proper nutrition, mineral and vitamin

supplementations prior breeding season

in some of the ranches

9

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

Sample size to estimate true prevalence based on sensitivity and specificity of the assay performed:

Sample size to estimate true prevalence

Inputs

Assumed true prevalence

Sensitivity

Specificity

Population size

Confidence

0.25

0.98

0.98

60000

0.95

Desired precision 0.05

Results

Sample size required

Population = 60000

Sample size

320

Sample sizes for varying sensitivity and specificity for population = 60000

Samples sizes required for true prevalence = 0.25, precision = 0.05 and a range of sensitivity and specificity values are shown below:

Sp = 0.7

Sp = 0.8

Sp = 0.9

Sp = 0.95

Sp = 0.99

Sp = 0.999

Se = 0.7

2220

Se = 0.8 Se = 0.9 Se = 0.95 Se = 0.99 Se = 0.999

1467 1039 892 795 775

1320

791

603

479

453

957

620

491

403

385

727

501

410

346

332

643

454

377

321

309

585

422

353

303

293

573

415

348

300

289

Humphry RW, Cameron A, Gunn GJ, 2004. A practical approach to calculate sample size for herd prevalence surveys. Prev. Vet. Med.

65: 173-188

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

Materials and Methods:

In years 2014, 2015 & 2016 (n=880) Bulls were sampled and tested as follows:

Day 1: Sample Collection & Culture Day 2: Nucleic Acid Extraction and Real-time PCR

37ºC x 24h

TrichIT (Morris Livestock

Products, Delavan, WI) &

InPouch (Biomed)

Incubation

If just culture is implemented, 7 days are required to reach 60-95% sensitivity and specificity… https://commons.wikimedia.

org/wiki/File%3ATritrichomo nas_foetus_(259_26)_Cultu red.jpg

10

7500 Fast real-time PCR

MagMAX Sample preparation system

Diagnostics time is reduced to just 24 hours of incubation time and 2 hours of the sample preparation and real-time

PCR

Sensitivity and Specificity is dramatically improved

(100/99.4%), respectively

Different methodologies of real-time PCR

11

Pooling of cultured samples and comparison of multistate laboratory workflows with the MagMAX sample preparation system and VetMAX quantitative polymerase chain reaction reagents for detection of Tritrichomonas foetus –colonized bulls

Lee Effinger , Lalitha Peddireddi , Marilyn Simunich , Richard Oberst , Catherine O’Connell & Ivan Leyva-Baca

Oregon Department of Agriculture, Animal Health and Identification Division, Animal Health Laboratory, Salem, OR (Effinger)

Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology (Peddireddi), Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS Kansas State

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (Oberst), Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS Animal Health Laboratory, Idaho State

Department of Agriculture, Boise, ID (Simunich) Animal Health and Food Safety Group at Life Technologies, Austin, TX

(LeyvaBaca, O’Connell) JVDI, 2014, Vol. 26(1) 72-87

Objectives:

1.

Compare different sample preparation systems and various real-time PCR (feeder lab workflows) with the 5X MagMAX TM -pathogen RNA/DNA purification kit and amplification with VetMAX TM T. foetus reagents (Life Technologies workflow)

2.

Determine the effect of pooling a single positive sample having various CT ranges with four negative samples (1:5). If a negative effect was seen, a 1:3 pooling study would then be conducted

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

Prevalence results: 450 total samples

15.79% (3)

37.5% (12)

32

19

104

31.73% (33)

74

10.81% (8)

24

26.23% (48)

183

16.67% (4)

Brangus

Angus

Razas

Brangus

Angus

Hererford

Charolais

Salers

Hereford

Charolais

Salers

Criollo

Criollo

Brahaman

Beef Master

Brahman

Beefmaster

Pardo Suizo

Simmental

Pardo Suizo

Simmental

Limousin

Limousin TOTAL

1

1

6

1

5

450

Total Infectados

183

24

48

4

74

104

19

32

8

33

3

12

0

1

3

0

1

113

%

26.23

16.67

10.81

31.73

15.79

37.5

0

20

0

100

50

25% prevalence

12

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

• Age as risk factor for BovineTrichomoniasis:

• One hypothesis for the age to be associated with trich is the development of crypts in the prepuce

• The other hypothesis is the promiscuity of older bulls (older bulls are more exposed to more cows vs younger inexperienced bulls)

13

Prevalence of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef bulls in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico Tested with MagMAX ™ Sample Preparation System and VetMAX TM -Gold Trich Detection Kit

• Distribution of Sampling and Positive Bulls 001 Ahumada

002 Aldama

003 Allende

004 Aquiles Serdán

005 Ascención

006 Bachíniva

007 Balleza

008 Batopilas

009 Bocoyna

010 Buenaventura

011 Camargo

012 Carichí

013 Casas Grandes

014 Coronado

015 Coyame del Sotol

016 La cruz

017 Cuahutémoc

018 Cusihuiriachi

019 Chihuahua

020 Chínipa

021 Delicias

022 Dr. Belisario

Dominguez

023 Galeana

024 Santa Isabel

025 Gómez Farías

026 Gran Morelos

027 Guachochi

028 Guadalupe

029 Guadalupe y Calvo

030 Guazapares

031 Guerrero

032 Hidalgo del Parral

033 Huejotitán

034 Ignacio Zaragoza

035 Janos

036 Jiménez

037 Juárez

038 Julimes

039 López

040 Madera

041 Maguarichi

042 Manuel Benavides

043 Matachí

044 Matamoros

045 Meoqui

046 Morelos

047 Moris

048 Namiquipa

049 Nonoava

050 Nuevo Casas Grandes

051 Ocampo

052 Ojinaga

053 Práxedis G. Guerrero

054 Riva Palacio

055 Rosales

056 Rosario

057 San Francisco Borja

058 San Francisco

Conchos

059 San Francisco del Oro

060 Santa Bárbara

061 Satevó

062 Saucillo

063 Temósachi

064 El Tule

065 Urique

066 Uruachi

067 Valle Zaragoza

14

Economic opportunity in Mexico by controlling T. foetus

Table 1. Economic opportunity for Mexico & Chihuahua increassing calving rate by 1%

Entity

Mexico

Chihuahua

Cow population

8,000,000.00

120,000.00

% Calving rate

50.00%

50.00%

Calves born annually

4,000,000.00

60,000.00

Improvement in calving rate by 1%

(extra calves)

40,000.00

600.00

Average calf weight (Lbs) for exportation to

USA

400.00

400.00

$CWT

Calf value once exported in USA

Economic impact with 1% Increase in Calving Rate

$ 300.00

$ 300.00

$ 1,200.00

$ 1,200.00

$ 48,000,000.00

$ 720,000.00

Table 2. Economic impact by increasing the calving rate in Mexico

Number of calves born

50%

4,000,000.00

60%

4,800,000.00

Inclease in calving rate

70%

5,600,000.00

80%

6,400,000.00

90%

7,200,000.00

Economic impact by increasing in calving rate in Mexico

$ 4,800,000,000 $ 5,760,000,000 $ 6,720,000,000 $ 7,680,000,000 $ 8,640,000,000

Table 3. Economic impact by increasing the calving rate in Chihuahua

50% 60%

Inclease in calving rate

70% 80%

Number of calves born 60,000.00

72,000.00

84,000.00

96,000.00

90%

108,000.00

Economic impact by increasing in calving rate in Chihuahua

$ 72,000,000 $ 86,400,000 $ 100,800,000 $ 115,200,000 $ 129,600,000

15

Clinical case 1:

Herd & Location: Delicias, Chihuahua, Mexico (Name of the operation will remain blinded)

• Overall status of the herd and anamnesis: Big ranch with a lot of open cows every year despite the feed supplements, minerals, vitamins etc. to sustain proper body condition for optimal reproduction.

Breed (s): Milti-

Breed predominantly Angus and Hereford in the bull’s battery.

# of Cows: ~ 2000 cow operation.

• # of Bulls: 60 bulls.

• Vaccination status: Vaccinated for Clostridial and abortive diseases panel (Reputable source).

Calving Rate: By the year 2003, they reported 33% calving rate.

Diagnostics: In year 2003, VetMAX-Gold trich Detection Kit was recommended on the complete battery of bulls.

• Results: 50% of the Bulls were positive for the test.

• Management strategy: it was recommended to get rid of the entire set of bulls, but the owner couldn't afford that. Therefore, he just got rid of the infected ones. Two more sequential smegma samplings on the negative bulls was implemented for Trich testing. All the open cows were rested at least 3 estrus cycles followed by Artificial Insemination and the usage of the clean bulls.

• Follow up, by the end of year 2015, the operation reported a calving rate of 72% which is a

~40% increase from previous years.

16

Acknowledgments

C .C. Lastra-González, E.

González-Rodríguez, J. A.

Ramírez-Godínez, E.

Santellano-Estrada, J. Baxter y

I. Leyva- Baca

For Veterinary Use Only. For In Vitro Use Only. Regulatory requirements vary by country; products may not be available in your geographic area. © 2016 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified.

17