Electromagnetism Physics 15b Lecture #7 Capacitance Purcell 3.5–3.8 What We Did Last Time Studied electric field near and around conductors Just outside a conductor surface, E = 0 in an empty space inside a conductor Concentric spheres + + + + + + + + E E=0 + + + area A + +++ + + +++ + E = 4πσ n̂ + Er φ + + r r 1 Today’s Goals Study a system with a conductive plane Demonstrate an image charge technique Define capacitance First, for an isolated conductor w.r.t. infinity Second, for a pair of conductors You’ll work on this in Lab 1 Dimension and unit Energy stored in a capacitor Discuss multi-conductor systems Generalize capacitance into a matrix Invert the matrix to prove another form of the uniqueness theorem Conductive Plane A point charge Q is placed above a large conductive plane It attracts negative charge distribution on the plane’s surface Field lines from Q terminate on the induced negative charge distribution +Q h Need to solve Laplace’s Equation above the plane, with a singularity at Q and a flat equipotential surface Generally a hard problem, but there is a trick for this one − − − − − 2 Image Charge Technique Consider two charges +Q and −Q separated by 2h Coulomb field x 2 — Easy enough to calculate E is vertical on the mid-plane The mid-plane is therefore an equipotential z +Q h The field above the mid-plane satisfies the boundary condition of the conductive plane problem h By the Uniqueness Theorem, it’s the solution This technique works in a problem with one (infinite) conductive plane −Q The −Q charge is called the “image charge” of the original Surface Charge z E field on the mid-plane points down −Q −2Qh E z (z = 0) = 2 × 2 cos θ = 2 2 r +h (r + h 2 )3 2 +Q It’s related to the surface charge density r E −Qh ρ(r ) = z = 4π 2π (r 2 + h 2 )3 2 ∫ ∞ 0 h −Q If we integrate over the entire surface, we get ∞ ⎡ Qh ⎤ −Qhr ρ(r )2π rdr = ∫ dr = ⎢ 2 ⎥ 0 (r 2 + h 2 )3 2 2 ⎣ r + h ⎦0 = −Q ∞ h θ r − − − − − 3 Does This Make Sense? Total charge “induced” on the plane is –Q Where did the corresponding positive charge go? Didn’t we start with a neutral conductor? − Culprit: the plane is “infinite” − − − − If the plane were finite, we’d see +Q distributed around the edge and on the back Exact result known for a disk (see Purcell) but beyond 15b + + + + − − −−−−− − − + + + + + Capacitance A conductor with charge Q has a potential φ0 w.r.t. infinity surface φ0 = − ∫ E ⋅ds ∝ Q because E is proportional to Q ∞ We define capacitance by the ratio C ≡ Q φ0 It is determined by the shape of the conductor Example: a spherical conductor with radius a E= Q r̂ (for r > a) r2 φ0 = Q a C=a Dimension of capacitance = (length) Unit of capacitance = cm 4 Capacitance Capacitance can also be defined for a pair of conductors This is in fact much more common Give two conductors +Q and −Q and measure the potential difference +Q −Q 1 φ1 − φ2 = − ∫ E ⋅ d s ∝ Q 2 Capacitance is defined by C = Q φ1 − φ2 Most useful case: two plates with a small gap in between area A s Parallel-Plate Capacitor If A is large (s is small), then this is similar to the double infinite sheets of charge we saw in Lecture 3 E is uniform between the plates E = 4πσ = Potential difference is φ1 − φ2 = Es = 4π Q A Capacitance is 4π Qs A C= +Q/A E −Q/A Q A = φ1 − φ2 4π s 5 Real World Capacitors Capacitors appear everywhere in electronics Computer memory (dynamic RAM) is an array of tiny capacitors Will do more on this later In electronics, we must use SI Charge is in coulomb (C), potential is in volt (V) SI unit for capacitance is farad (F) = coulomb (C) volt (V) Conversion from CGS: 1 farad = 9 x 1011 cm Since 1 farad is such a large unit, we often use 1 µF = 10 −6 F 1 pF = 10 −12 F Ex: a spherical conductor with a 10 cm radius has a capacitance of 10 cm = 11 pF Energy in a Capacitor E field inside a parallel-plate capacitor contains energy E2 2π Q 2s Q 2 U=∫ dV = = V 8π A 2C +Q/A This is also how much work is needed to “charge up” the capacitor from 0 to Q −Q/A E= 4π Q A q When the charge is q, the potential difference is Δφ = C Work required to move a small charge dq qdq from the bottom plate to the top plate is dW = Δφ dq = Integrate: W = ∫ Q 0 qdq Q 2 = C 2C C Q2 Generally for any capacitor, energy U = 2C 6 Multiple Conductors φ0 = 0 Generalize to multiple conductors Everything is enclosed in a (possibly infinite) boundary at φ0 = 0 φ1,Q1 If potential φ1, φ2, φ3, … of all conductors are given, φ is uniquely determined everywhere Uniqueness theorem φ2 ,Q2 φ3 ,Q3 Once φ is known, so is E, and so is σ on all conductor surfaces Charges Q1, Q2, Q3, … of all conductors are determined Superposition principle guarantees: Qi = Ci1φ1 + Ci 2φ2 + C13φ3 + = ∑ Cijφ j j Constants Cij are coefficients of capacitance Coefficients of Capacitance To determine Cij, set φ1 > 0 and all other φi = 0 φ0 = 0 Qi = Ci1φ1 φ1 > 0 All field lines start from 1 and end on other conductors or the boundary B Q1 > 0, Qi ≠1 ≤ 0, QB ≤ 0 Total charge including QB must be zero ∑ Qi + QB = 0 → i ∑ Qi ≥ 0 φ2 = 0 i So the coeffs. Cij must satisfy Cii > 0, Ci ≠ j ≤ 0, and φ3 = 0 ∑C ij ≥0 j Also: Cij = Cji see Purcell Problem 3.27 ⎡ ⎢ [Cij ] = ⎢ ⎢⎣ + − − + − − − − + ⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥⎦ 7 Potential Coefficients Can we solve Qi = ∑ Cijφ j for φj? j Only if the [Cij] matrix is invertible, i.e, |Cij| ≠ 0 The “shape” of [Cij] we’ve found on the last slide ensures |Cij| ≠ 0 So we can invert the matrix and get φi = ∑ PijQ j , where P = C −1 j Pij are called the potential coefficients At this point we know that specifying charges Qj of all conductors (plus the potential φ0 of the boundary) uniquely determines the field φ everywhere Physically “obvious” but also mathematically true Summary Image-charge technique for a conductive plane Definitions of capacitance z +Q Single isolated conductor Q Q C≡ or Between two conductors φ φ1 − φ2 Unit: cm in CGS, farad in SI Parallel-plate capacitor h area A s A C= 4π s h −Q 2 Q 2C General multi-conductor system Energy stored in a capacitor: U = Qi = ∑ Cijφ j j φi = ∑ PijQ j , where P = C −1 j 8