99 Analysis and Design of Novel Structures of Artificial Transmission Lines for MMIC/MHMIC Technology Yansheng Xu and Renato G. Bosisio Abstract— In this paper, some new types of artificial transmission lines, compatible with monolithic-microwave integrated-circuit/miniature hybrid-microwave integrated-circuit technology are presented. In the new designs, short subsections of different lines are connected together to achieve the needed performance of various transmission-line functions such as impedance transformation, power coupling, etc. Theoretical calculations are given and some typical design data are provided, including models of extremely low impedance lines, which are very practical in the design of microwave power amplifiers and oscillators using heterojunction bipolar transistors or high electron-mobility transistors. Calculation results are validated by simulations and experiments. The proposed structures are very flexible and can easily provide transmission lines with widely varying characteristics. Index Terms—Coplanar waveguides, microstrip, microwave integrated circuits, MMIC’s, transmission lines. I. INTRODUCTION Transmission lines are the basic elements used in the design of microwave components, circuits, and subsystems. Numerous types of microwave transmission lines have been proposed and successfully used. However, transmission lines capable of achieving very high and very low impedances with large operating bandwidths and compatible with monolithic-microwave integrated-circuit (MMIC)/miniature hybrid-microwave integrated-circuit (MHMIC) technology are still an important topic of study due to applications in wireless and satellite communications. Ultra-low impedance transmission lines find applications in matching networks wherever low-impedance devices such as power FET’s [heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBT’s), high electron-mobility transistors (HEMT’s), pseudomorphic HEMT’s (pHEMT’s)] are used. Recently, low-loss coplanar waveguide (CPW) and thin-film microstrip transmission line (TFMS) with ultra-low characteristic impedance on multilayer MMIC’s were realized [1]–[5]. The fabrication of such transmission lines is complex and the required multilayer technology is very costly and is not always available in certain MMIC foundries. This paper provides numerical calculations and designs of structures composed of numerous connected short subsections containing different types of transmission lines, as shown in Fig. 1. This arrangement makes the design more flexible, and such structures can be easily realized using strip lines, microstrip lines, CPW, or other standard transmission lines. This concept in designing transmission lines is especially effective in the construction of ultra-low characteristic impedance wide-band transmission lines as used in MMIC/MHMIC technology. The proposed approach uses only metal–insulator–metal (MIM) capacitors and air bridges, in addition to standard transmission lines available in every MMIC or MHMIC foundry. Numerous new transmission lines and components can be developed using this concept, as is further illustrated in this paper. Manuscript received November 4, 1997; revised September 21, 1998. This work was supported by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The authors are with the Centre de Recherches Avancées en Microondes et en Electronique Spatiale (Poly-Grames), Département de Génie Electrique et de Génie Informatique, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, P.Q., Canada H3C 3A7. Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9480(99)00391-9. Fig. 1. Illustration of a single transmission line composed of This transmission line is matched to impedance Z0 . n unit cells. II. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS The calculated transmission lines consist of n unit cells, as shown in Fig. 1. A. Analysis of Single Transmission Lines At first, a unit cell of the transmission line composed of m subsections, shown in Fig. 1, is calculated and then we will study the cascade connection of these unit cells into the whole transmission line [see Fig. 1]. Calculation of a Unit Cell: Referring to Fig. 1, the impedances and electrical lengths of the different subsections of the unit cell are equal to Z1 ; Z2 ; Z3 ; 1 1 1 ; Zm and 1 ; 2 ; 1 1 1 ; m , respectively. The transfer matrices of this unit cell takes the following form: A = A1 A2 A3 ; 1 1 1 ; A (1) i = (j=Zcossin i ) i jZi sin i cos i (2) 1 1 m with Ai for i = 1; 2; 3; 1 1 1 ; m. Here Zi , i are the impedance and electrical length of the ith subsection, respectively. The reflection and transmission coefficients for this unit cell take the following form: A + B=Z0 A + B=Z0 0= 0 CZ0 0 D + CZ0 + D (3) and T = 2 (A + B=Z0 + CZ0 + D) (4) where A, B , C , D are the elements of the transfer matrices of the unit cell and Z0 is the characteristic impedance of the terminating input and output lines. In the design of a practical transmission line, it is essential to use a symmetrical structure. The components A and D of the transfer matrix A are then equal and, hence, the matching condition at each end of the unit cell simplifies to 0= B=Z0 0 CZ0 2A + B=Z0 + CZ0 =0 (5) and Z0 = B=C . For both the symmetrical and asymmetrical cases, under the condition that the electrical lengths of all the subsections are small and neglecting all the higher order terms of i , the reflection and transmission coefficients for this unit cell take the following form: 0 =: m i=1 0i = j m i=1 (Zi i =2Z0 0 Z0 i =2Zi ) (6) and T 0018–9480/99$10.00 1999 IEEE =: 1 0 j m i=1 (Zi i =2Z0 + Z0 i =2Zi ): (7) 100 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 47, NO. 1, JANUARY 1999 each connection point and takes the following form: 0t =: 0r1 + n i=2 0ri ej 2 (9) where 0t is the total reflection of the whole line, 0ri stands for the reflection of the ith unit cell, and ri is the total phase shift from the input plane of the transmission line to the input plane of the ith unit cell. It is common to use identical unit cells to build a piece of transmission line. In this case, the calculation is simplified to the well-known results as follows: j0t j =: j0r j sin(n + 1)r = sin r = j0r jUn (cos r ): Fig. 2. Dependence of impedance ratio Z1 =Z2 with electric length ratio 1 =2 of the inhomogeneous transmission line with Z02 =Z1 Z2 as the parameter. The matching condition requires that the reflection coefficient vanishes and, from (6), we have Z0 = ( ( ) : ) m i=1 Zi i m i=1 i =Zi 0 (8) In the case where m = 2, we can solve for the length ratio 1 =2 = (1 0 Z02 =Z22 )=(Z1 =Z2 )(Z02=Z12 0 1) or Z1 =Z2 = (SK 0 1)=(K 0 S ) where K = 1 =2 and S = Z02 =Z1 Z2 . The dependence of the electric length ratio K with impedance ratio Z1 =Z2 for different S values is shown in Fig. 2. The horizontal line S = 1 extends to the vertical axis Z1 =Z2 at point (1,1) and then may take any value along this axis for 1 =2 = 1. The above equations and Fig. 2 are also valid for the symmetrical case m = 3 with Z1 = Z3 , 1 = 3 if the substitution 1 ! 21 is made. It should be mentioned that the choice of subsection 1 and 2 is arbitrary and, hence, we need only to plot the curves of Fig. 2 for K 1. When the above matching condition is satisfied, the residual reflection coefficient of a single cell 0r due to higher order terms of i can be obtained from the second-order term of the small values i in m m (3) and takes the form of j =i+1 i=1 (Zj =Zi 0 Zi =Zj )i j =2. However, for the symmetrical cases, these second-order terms of i cancel each other and only the third and higher order terms are left in the expressions of 0r . Hence, it is preferable to use symmetrical structures in practical designs, such as to reduce the reflection coefficient of the designed transmission line, especially when i is not very small. Cascade Connection of n Unit Cells: It should be pointed out that the above analysis is valid when the total length of the unit cell is small. Hence, we can connect numerous unit cells in cascade to construct a piece of transmission line with the needed length. Generally speaking, these unit cells may be different from each other. However, all unit cells should be matched to the same terminating impedance Z0 to keep this transmission line matched at all interconnecting points of different cells. The phase change and losses of the whole transmission line is equal to the sum of the phase change and losses of the unit cells, respectively. The total reflection coefficient of a piece of transmission with n unit cells should be calculated by superposition of the individual reflections at (10) Generally speaking, it is recommended to choose the electrical length of each unit cell to be less than 1/40 of a wavelength. This is equivalent to the use of more than ten unit cells in constructing a =4 coupled line to design a quadrature coupler, as suggested in [6]. This rule is not critical, since the resultant j0t j also depends on many other factors, such as the impedance ratio Zi =Zj and so forth. In the case where the total length of the transmission line is shorter than =4, no maximum value of j0t j will appear and, hence, larger values of r are acceptable. III. IMPLEMENTATION OF SOME NEW STRUCTURES OF TRANSMISSION LINES In this section, we will study the implementation of some new structures of the CPW and microstrip line. However, the same principle of implementation may be applied to other types of transmission lines without difficulty. 1) Miniaturized Microstrip Line (MMSL): From the analysis given in the previous section, an MMSL can be designed and fabricated using air bridges, support posts, and the ground plane, as shown in Fig. 3(a) (cross section) and Fig. 3(b) (side view), respectively. The effects of the MIM capacitors formed by the support posts and ground plane can be handled by using (3)–(8). The characteristic impedance of MMSL can be increased or reduced by changing the width of the strip or the lengths of the support posts. The advantages of MMSL are: 1) achievement of ultra-low impedances by using wide strips and large dimensions of the support posts; 2) the strip is suspended for the most part in air and, hence, the dispersion can be expected to be small; and 3) MMSL needs no substrate and, hence, it can be used conveniently as transmission lines in low-cost SiGe MMIC circuits [7]. 2) Ultra-Low-Impedance CPW and Microstrip Line: The ultralow-impedance CPW is achieved by adding MIM capacitors to the conventional CPW line. These MIM capacitors are connected to the ground plane by air bridges or via holes, as shown in Fig. 3(c) (cross section). 3) Miniaturized Twin-Conductor Line (MTCL) The construction of the MTCL is the same as the MMSL with the difference that the width of the ground plane is reduced to form the lower line of the MTCL. A cross section of the MTCL is shown in Fig. 3(d). 4) Broadside Tightly Coupled CPW Line: A broadside tightly coupled CPW line can also be made, as shown in Fig. 3(e). Its advantage lies in that very tight coupling can easily be achieved by using this type of transmission line. In an actual MMIC fabrication processes, a thin dielectric layer (100–200-nm thickness) is deposited on the main metal layer to form MIM capacitors. This dielectric layer is omitted in Fig. 3 for simplicity. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 47, NO. 1, JANUARY 1999 101 (b) (a) (d) (c) (e) Fig. 3. The proposed MMSL and ultra-low-impedance CPW and microstrip. (a) Cross section of MMSL. (b) Side view 1: air bridge, 2: support post, 3: ground plane, 4: substrate. (c) Cross section of a ultra-low-impedance CPW. 1: air bridge, 2: center conductor of CPW, 3: support post or via hole, 4: substrate, 5: ground plane, 6: support post. (d) Cross section of an MTCL. 1: air bridge, 2: support post, 3: lower conductor, 4: substrate. (e) Cross section of a broadside tightly coupled CPW line. 1: air bridge, 2: support post, 3: lower conductor, 4: substrate, 5: ground. IV. SIMULATED AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A simulation of the MMSL, which was described in the previous section and shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b), is made. The height of the air bridge is equal to 1.6 m, its width equals 20 m, the length of the air-bridge post is also 20 m, and the length of the air bridge is equal to 80 m. An MMSL with 12 unit cells (n = 12, m = 2) is designed with the above data, its total length equals 12 2 (20 + 80) = 1200 m. The impedances and propagation constants of these two different subsections (subsection 1 stands for the air-bridge part and subsection 2 stands for the air-bridge post part) are obtained by simulation on HFSS1; the coefficient K = 1 =2 is calculated to be 1.677 and the characteristic impedances are Z1 = 24:21 , Z2 = 1:29 . This MMSL is matched to 7.01 impedance. Simulation on MOMENTUM1 is performed and the reflection coefficient is 045.5 dB at 2 GHz and increases to 023.5 dB at 20 GHz. Simulation of the same line with symmetrical unit cells (m = 3 and 1 ! 21 = 23 ) is also made and the obtained reflection coefficient is the same as the asymmetrical case at 2 GHz, increases more slowly, and reaches 030 dB at 20 GHz. A similar design of MMSL matched to 50- impedance is also made. In this case, the width of the air bridge is 5 m, the dimension of the air bridge post is 4 2 4 m, and distances between the posts are equal to 40 m. Altogether, 17 air-bridge posts are used. Individual unit cells are designed using HFSS and the whole MMSL is simulated using MOMENTUM. This MMSL was fabricated together with two MMSL to 50- CPW transitions, as shown in the MMIC layout in Fig. 4. The simulated and test results are shown in the same figure and agreement between these data are obtained. The measured loss of this MMSL is around 0.3 dB, including the MMSL to CPW transitions. V. CONCLUSION Novel structures of different artificial transmission lines are proposed. Simulation and experimental results show that the nonuniform 1 HFSS is a trademark of Hewlett-Packard Company. Fig. 4. Reflection coefficient of a typical MMSL, ——: simulation using MOMENTUM, xxxxx: measured. lines can provide similar performance to ordinary homogeneous lines, with the added advantages of providing design flexibility, as shown by the demonstration of some new types of transmission lines such as MMSL, ultra-low impedance CPW, and so forth. Theoretical analysis and design formulas are provided. It is noted that the symmetrical structure has important advantages over the asymmetrical one. Simulation and experimental results are in agreement with theoretical analysis values. In the new transmission-line designs, only standard MIM capacitors and air bridges are used. Such circuit fabrication technology is quite common and it is available in every MMIC/MHMIC foundry, whereas other low-impedance transmission lines such as TFMS can be realized only using multilayer MMIC techniques. 102 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 47, NO. 1, JANUARY 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors wish to thank Y. Coulibaly for measurement of the MMSL. The fabrication of the MMSL was made by the MMIC foundry of Nortel through Canadian Microelectronics Corporation (CMC). REFERENCES [1] T. Hiraoka, T. Tokumitsu, and M. Aikawa, “Very small wide-band MMIC magic-T’s using microstrip lines on a thin dielectric film,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 37, pp. 1569–1575, Oct. 1989. [2] M. Gillick and I. D. Robertson, “Ultra low impedance CPW transmission lines for multilayer MMIC’s,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., 1993, pp. 145–148. [3] M. Gillick and I. D. Robertson, “An X -band monolithic power amplifier using low characteristic impedance thin-film microstrip transformers,” IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett., vol. 2, pp. 328–330, Aug. 1992. [4] T. Tokumitsu, T. Hiraoka, H. Nakamoto, and T. Takenaka, “Multilayer MMIC using a 3 m 3 layer dielectric film structure,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., 1990, pp. 831–834. [5] D. Willems and I. Bahl, “An MMIC-compatible tightly coupled line structure using embedded microstrip,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 41, pp. 2303–2310, Dec. 1993. [6] Y. Xu and R. G. Bosisio, “A novel structure of tightly coupled lines for MMIC/MHMIC couplers and phase shifters,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 45, pp. 1594–1599, Sept. 1997. [7] M. Case, “SiGe MMIC’s and flip-chip MIC’s for low cost microwave systems,” Microwave J., vol. 40, pp. 264–276, May 1997. (a) 2 Accuracy Estimation of Mixed-Mode Scattering Parameter Measurements (b) David E. Bockelman, William R. Eisenstadt, and Robert Stengel Fig. 1. Simplified block diagrams of typical (a) PMVNA and (b) FPVNA. Abstract—The pure-mode vector network analyzer (PMVNA) provides direct measurement of differential circuits. Residual error models are derived for the PMVNA and a traditional four-port vector network analyzer (FPVNA). The residual error models are used to calculate the maximum and root-mean-square uncertainties in measurements of mixed-mode scattering parameters of a typical differential amplifier. The uncertainties produced by the PMVNA are compared to the transformed mixed-mode s-parameters of the FPVNA. The PMVNA is shown to have lower uncertainty when measuring differential devices. conversion. Recently, a new specialized vector network analyzer (VNA) system has been developed for the measurement of differential circuits [2]. This new analyzer, called a pure-mode VNA (PMVNA), directly measures mixed-mode s-parameters by stimulating and measuring the DUT with differential-mode and common-mode signals. The calibration of the PMVNA has been described in [3], and shown to have good accuracy with respect to measurements of two-port verification standards. However, these reported results do not establish the relative accuracy of the PMVNA with respect to a traditional four-port VNA. This paper will assess the relative accuracy of the two analyzers, showing that the PMVNA has significant accuracy advantages for the measurement of mixed-mode s-parameters of differential devices. As developed in [1], the mixed-mode s-parameters of a two-port differential circuit are Index Terms—Calibration, measurement standards, networks. I. INTRODUCTION Differential circuits are becoming increasingly important in RF and microwave applications, particularly in integrated circuits due to crosstalk immunity and increased dynamic range over ground referenced circuits. This increase has lead to the development of mixed-mode scattering parameters (s-parameters) [1] where a differential device-under-test (DUT) is characterized by its response to both differential and common-mode signals, including any mode Manuscript received January 14, 1998; revised June 10, 1998. D. E. Bockelman and R. Stengel are with Motorola Radio Products Applied Research, Plantation, FL 33322 USA (e-mail: d.bockelman@ieee.org). W. R. Eisenstadt is with the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA. Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9480(99)00392-0. S S mm = S S dd cd S S dc cc (1) S where dd are the differential s-parameters, cc the common-mode s-parameters, and dc and cd the mode-conversion s-parameters. The PMVNA directly measures these mixed-mode s-parameters, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Standard four-port s-parameters and mixedmode s-parameters are related by the similarity transformation [2] 0018–9480/99$10.00 1999 IEEE S S S mm = MSstd M01 (2)