Buck Boost vs. Buck Converter Battery Life for Portable

advertisement
AN-118
Buck Boost vs. Buck Converter Battery Life for Portable
3.3V Micro Hard Disk Drive Applications
Introduction
Many of today's MP3 players, multimedia players, digital video recorders, and other portable electronic devices
have found the micro hard disk drive to be the optimum device for memory storage requirements.
Given the Lithium-ion battery voltage range of 2.5V to 4.2V and the typical micro hard disk drive voltage of
3.3V, an obvious dilemma associated with this application is whether to use a low dropout DC/DC step-down
(buck) converter or a step-down/step-up (buck-boost) converter.
A buck converter (Figure 1) provides the most efficient solution with the smallest external components, but
drops out near 3.3V. At this point, the converter transitions to 100% duty cycle operation and tracks the battery voltage. A buck-boost solution has the advantage of regulating the output voltage over the full Lithium-ion
voltage range, but suffers from lower efficiency and a larger total footprint. Additionally, most Lithium-ion batteries have a plateau from 3.5V to 3.6V and very little charge below the plateau, limiting the usefulness of the
buck-boost converter and its wide input voltage range.
Theory
The buck-boost converter uses a four-switch configuration, operating as a buck, boost, or buck-boost converter. It has four power switches, only two of which switch at any given time, with a third that remains on continuously throughout the switching period (Figure 2). For a battery voltage greater than 3.6V, the buck-boost
operates as a buck converter while, for an input voltage less than 3.6V, it behaves similar to a buck-boost or
boost converter. Below 3.6V, the buck-boost converter input current increases beyond the load current, while
the buck converter enters the 100% duty cycle dropout where the input current is limited to the load current
and the output voltage tracks the input.
So, which converter will provide the best battery life for this application?
2.5V - 4.2V
Q1
120mΩ
3.3µH
130mΩ
3.3V
Q2
130mΩ
M
Figure 1: Lithium-Ion to 3.3V 1.3MHz Step-Down Buck Converter.
AN-118.2006.08.1.0
1
AN-118
2.5V to 4.2V
Q1
100mΩ
2.2µH
110mΩ
Q2
100mΩ
Q4
100mΩ
Q3
100mΩ
3.3V
M
Figure 2: Lithium-Ion to 3.3V 1.5MHz Buck-Boost Converter
(Buck: Q1 and Q2 Switching, Q4 On; Boost: Q3 and Q4 Switching, Q1 On).
Experiment
This application note examines the Lithium-ion battery life of both a multi-mode buck-boost converter and a
buck converter for a 3.3V micro hard disk drive application.
An arbitrarily large converter would provide better efficiency and a longer battery life than a smaller converter,
regardless of topology. Therefore, for a fair comparison with meaningful results, converters of equal size were
tested. Both converters had similar power MOSFET RDS(ON) and inductor DCR resistance, resulting in roughly
equal losses and battery discharge characteristics above 3.6V. Both converters also used a 3x3mm IC package with similar sized external inductors and capacitors, so that the total solution footprint area was the same.
The buck battery life was defined as the time required for the output to decay to 5% below the nominal 3.3V output. The buck-boost converter battery life was defined as the time at which the battery and converter shut down.
A fully charged battery was applied to the input of the converter and a constant current load was applied to the
output. The battery and converter voltage were recorded at specific intervals until the battery was fully discharged.
RDS(ON)
Inductor DCR
Total
Buck Integrated Converter
4 Switch Buck Boost
Integrated Converter
125mΩ
3x3mm TDFN
3.3µH
130mΩ
3x3x1.4mm
255mΩ
2 x 100mΩ
3x3mm TDFN
2.2µH
110mΩ
3x3x1.4mm
310mΩ
Table 1: Converter Characteristics.
Results
Throughout most of the battery discharge curve, both converters operate in a buck mode (Figure 3). This gives
the performance advantage to the buck converter, which has one less power MOSFET in the power conversion process. Below 3.5V, the buck-boost converter input current increases (Figure 6). This increasing current,
compounded with the characteristic increasing battery discharge rate, quickly discharges the battery below
3.5V (Figure 4).
In summary, the buck converter consistently displayed equal or better battery life. At 300mA, the buck output
voltage remained within the 5% tolerance for up to nine minutes longer than the buck-boost. Additionally, the
buck converter continued to operate in dropout mode, tracking the battery voltage for an additional four minutes. At 800mA, the battery life was identical for both converters. See the results in Table 2.
2
AN-118.2006.08.1.0
AN-118
Output
Buck
3.3V @ 300mA
3.3V @ 800mA
236
77
Battery Life (minutes)
Buck-Boost
227
77
Table 2: Battery Life Test Results.
Battery Discharge
Battery Discharge
(IO = 300mA; VO = 3.3V;
LENMAR DLO10B 1100mA Battery)
(IO = 300mA; VO = 3.3V;
LENMAR DLO10B 1100mA Battery)
4
4
Buck Battery
Buck-Boost Battery
3.5
3
3.3V - 5%
Buck Output
2.5
2
Buck-Boost Output
Battery Voltage (V)
Battery Voltage (V)
4.5
Buck Battery
3.5
Buck-Boost Battery
3
3.3V - 5%
Buck-Boost Output
Buck Output
2.5
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
200
205
210
Time (minutes)
225
230
235
Battery Current vs. Voltage
(VO = 3.3V @300mA)
Buck Battery
3.5
Buck Output
3.3V - 5%
Buck-Boost Battery
2.5
Buck-Boost Output
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time (minutes)
Figure 5: 800mA Lithium-Ion Battery Discharge.
AN-118.2006.08.1.0
Battery Current (mA)
Battery Discharge
(IO = 800mA; VO = 3.3V;
LENMAR DLO10B 1100mA Battery)
4
240
Figure 4: 300mA Lithium-Ion Battery Discharge.
4.5
Battery Voltage (V)
220
Time (minutes)
Figure 3: Lithium-Ion Battery Discharge.
3
215
500
450
400
Buck Boost
350
300
250
Buck
200
150
100
2.7
3
3.3
3.6
3.9
4.2
Battery Voltage (V)
Figure 6: Lithium-Ion Battery Discharge.
3
Summary and Conclusions
Portable Lithium-ion applications that require 3.3V for a micro hard disk drive will not always show extended
battery life when substituting a buck converter with a buck-boost converter. In this test, the buck battery life
exceeded the buck-boost battery life by nine minutes when powering a 3.3V output loaded to a typical micro
hard disk drive level of 300mA.
Due to the increased dropout voltage of the buck converter and the lower plateau voltage of the Lithium-ion
battery, there was effectively no difference in battery life between the two converters at 800mA.
Most Lithium-ion batteries plateau at a voltage level sufficient for a buck converter to regulate at 3.3V throughout most of the battery life. Past the plateau region, very little battery charge remains, minimizing the advantage of a buck-boost converter's wide input voltage range. A battery with a plateau below 3.3V is better suited
for a buck-boost converter and more likely to provide increased battery life for 3.3V applications.
When considering the type of converter best suited for battery life in an application it is important to evaluate
the battery and converter characteristics (e.g., plateau, efficiency, etc.) at specific load conditions. Finally, laboratory tests help to provide real results that can help select the optimum converter for the application.
© Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
AnalogicTech cannot assume responsibility for use of any circuitry other than circuitry entirely embodied in an AnalogicTech product. No circuit patent licenses, copyrights, mask work rights,
or other intellectual property rights are implied. AnalogicTech reserves the right to make changes to their products or specifications or to discontinue any product or service without notice.
Customers are advised to obtain the latest version of relevant information to verify, before placing orders, that information being relied on is current and complete. All products are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgement, including those pertaining to warranty, patent infringement, and limitation of liability. AnalogicTech
warrants performance of its semiconductor products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with AnalogicTech’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are utilized to the extent AnalogicTech deems necessary to support this warranty. Specific testing of all parameters of each device is not necessarily performed.
AnalogicTech and the AnalogicTech logo are trademarks of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated. All other brand and product names appearing in this document are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective holders.
Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
830 E. Arques Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Phone (408) 737-4600
Fax (408) 737-4611
4
AN-118.2006.08.1.0
Download