Multifrequency nature of the 0.75 mHz feature in the X

advertisement

Multifrequency nature of the 0.75 mHz feature in the

X-ray light curves of the nova V4743 Sgr

Andrej Dobrotka

Departement of Physics

Faculty of Material Sciences and Technology

Slovak University of technology in Bratislava

Slovakia

Jan-Uwe Ness

ESAC

Spain

The nova observations

- September 2002 – discovery

(Haseda et al. 2002)

- March 2003 – Chandra large amplitude fast X-ray variability of ~22 min with overtones

(Ness et al. 2003)

- April 2003 – XMM-Newton fast X-ray variability with multiple frequency detection

(Leibowitz et al. 2006)

- 2003 and 2005 – unfiltered CCD photometry detection of orbital period of 6.7 h and fast variability of ~24 min

(Kang et al. 2006)

The first interpretations (Ness et al. 2003) day 180

- supersoft X-ray source phase (SSS) – final stage of nova activity

- continuous spectrum

- deep absorptions lines

- kT ≈ 30 – 50 eV

- L bol

≈ 10 36 – 10 38 ergs s -1

The first interpretations (Ness et al. 2003) day 180

- supersoft X-ray source phase (SSS) – final stage of nova activity

- continuous spectrum

- deep absorptions lines

- kT ≈ 30 – 50 eV

- L bol

≈ 10 36 – 10 38 ergs s -1

- after 13 ks a strong decline

- count rate from ~ 40 to almost 0

- hardness ratio decreased

- soft spectrum to hard spectrum

- detected fast variability with overtones:

P

1

= 1324 s (22 min)

P

2

= 668 s ≈ P1/2

P

3

= 448 s ≈ P1/3

The first interpretations (Ness et al. 2003) day 180

- supersoft X-ray source phase (SSS) – final stage of nova activity

- continuous spectrum

- deep absorptions lines

- kT ≈ 30 – 50 eV

- L bol

≈ 10 36 – 10 38 ergs s -1

- after 13 ks a strong decline

- count rate from ~ 40 to almost 0

- hardness ratio decreased

- soft spectrum to hard spectrum

- detected fast variability with overtones:

P

1

= 1324 s (22 min)

P

2

= 668 s ≈ P1/2

P

3

= 448 s ≈ P1/3

- decline unexplained, eclipse unlikely

- the spectrum should harden

- min. too long (6 ks, P orb

- fast variability

≈ 24 ks)

- white dwarf rotation (overtones!!!)

- pulsations of the white dwarf

The first interpretations (Leibowitz et al. 2006) day 196

- detection of 12 significant signals

- detection of 6 significant signals in reanalysed day 180

- 0.75 mHz has double structure;

0.729 and 0.763 mHz ... day 196

0.721 and 0.777 mHz ... day 180

- overtones

- double frequency; 1.459,1.504 mHz

- relations 2 x f, f

1

+ f

2

The first interpretations (Leibowitz et al. 2006) day 196

- detection of 12 significant signals

- detection of 6 significant signals in reanalysed day 180

- 0.75 mHz has double structure;

0.729 and 0.763 mHz ... day 196

0.721 and 0.777 mHz ... day 180

- overtones

- double frequency; 1.459,1.504 mHz

- relations 2 x f, f

1

+ f

2

- 0.75 mHz - white dwarf rotation

- other signals – WD pulsations

The first interpretations (Kang et al. 2006) days 258-265 and 1003-1011

- combination of 3 frequencies f f

1

= 0.041 mHz

= 0.705 mHz

2 f

3

= 0.755 mHz

P

P

P

3

1

2

= 402 min = 6.7 h (Kang et al. 2006)

= 24 min

= 22 min

(Kang et al. 2006)

(X-ray from Ness et al. 2003) f

3

- f

1

= 0.714 mHz ≈ 0.71 mHz ≈ f

2 f f f

1

– orbital frequency

2

3

– beat frequency between f

1

and f

3

– spin period of the white dwarf

=> an intermediate polar candidate

New observations

- 8 data sets (days 50 – 1286)

- Chandra/LETGS

- XMM-Newton/MOS,RGS

- detrending with a 5 th order polynome

Method used for period analysis

- Lomb-Scargle method (Scargle 1982)

- formal errors HWHM

- Sine fitting

- fitting of the model with n signals, 5 th order polynome and mean background

- goodness criterion a likelihood

- error determination from confidence

contours from likelihood difference

Method used for period analysis – tests

- synthetic data sampled as day 180

- added Poisson/Gaussian noise

- single frequency case f = 0.72 mHz

- two frequency case f f

2

1

= 0.72 mHz

= 0.76 mHz

Method used for period analysis – tests

- synthetic data sampled as day 180

- added Poisson/Gaussian noise

- single frequency case f = 0.72 mHz

- two frequency case f f

2

1

= 0.72 mHz

= 0.76 mHz

Method used for period analysis – tests

- synthetic data sampled as day 180

- added Poisson/Gaussian noise

- single frequency case f = 0.72 mHz

- two frequency case f f

2

1

= 0.72 mHz

= 0.76 mHz

- L-S and sine fitting with n = 1 found a single frequency at 0.744 mHz

- sine fitting with n = 2 found both signals

Method used for period analysis – tests

- synthetic data sampled as day 180

- added Poisson/Gaussian noise

- single frequency case f = 0.72 mHz

- two frequency case f f

2

1

= 0.72 mHz

= 0.76 mHz

- L-S and sine fitting with n = 1 found a single frequency at 0.744 mHz

- sine fitting with n = 2 found both signals

Analysis – Lomb-Scargle

- broad peaks

- blending?

Analysis – Lomb-Scargle

- broad peaks – blending?

Analysis – sine fitting

- detection criterion 3-σ

- error measured from 3-σ contours

- analysed interval 0.6 – 0.9 mHz

- 3-σ closed contour => 2 signals

- 3-σ open lines => 1 signal

Analysis – sine fitting

- detection criterion 3-σ

- error measured from 3-σ contours

- analysed interval 0.6 – 0.9 mHz

- 3-σ closed contour => 2 signals

- 3-σ open lines => 1 signal

- day 180 case: n = 2 fit better than n = 1

ΔL = 1978.48

Leibowitz day 196 day 180

Analysis – sine fitting

- detection criterion 3-σ

- error measured from 3-σ contours

- analysed interval 0.6 – 0.9 mHz

- 3-σ closed contour => 2 signals

- 3-σ open lines => 1 signal

- day 180 case: n = 2 fit better than n = 1

ΔL = 1978.48

- other observations – single frequency

Leibowitz day 196 day 180 day 1286

Analysis – sine fitting

- detection criterion 3-σ

- error measured from 3-σ contours

- analysed interval 0.6 – 0.9 mHz

- 3-σ closed contour => 2 signals

- 3-σ open lines => 1 signal

- day 180 case: n = 2 fit better than n = 1

ΔL = 1978.48

- other observations – single frequency

- overtones:

180 ------2 x f

2

196 2 x f

1

1286 2 x f

1

2 x f

2 f

1

+ f

-------

-------------

2

Leibowitz day 196 day 180 day 1286

Analysis – frequency detection

Test – day 302, synthetic data modulated with 0.72 and 0.76 mHz

Detections - L-S: 0.731 mHz

- 2-D, 3-σ open lines: 0.736 mHz

- 2-D, global minimum: 0.678 and 0.745 mHz f = 0.72 mHz f

1

= 0.72 mHz, f

2

= 0.76 mHz

Analysis – frequency detection

- two close frequencies f

1

and f

2

forms a beating with a frequency of f

1

– f

2

- if data longer than 1/(f

1

– f

2

) => long enough

- 2 signals in synthetic test data shorter than beating

- day 180 detection

- day 302 nondetection

=> amplitudes and noise!

Results – frequency evolution

- days 50 – 526, changes

- days 180 – 196, approaching

- days 302 – 526, merging?

- days 742 – 1286, constant?

Results – amplitudes, amplitude evolution

- after day 180 – decline, connection to fast decline during day 180?

- after day 526 – increase

Summary of the observational results

- double frequency nature of the 0.75 mHz peak at days 180 and 196

- single signal after day 526 (196 – 526, not sure, short data sets)

- frequency changing up to day 526

- signal constant after day 526

- relative amplitudes decline after day 180

- relative amplitudes increase after day 526

=> different behaviour of signals before and after day 526 – decline from SSS phase -> nova was turning off!

Interpretation – white dwarf rotation

- signals must be stable

- if two close signals – spin and beat period (between orbital and spin)

- does not agree up to day 526

- agree after day 526

P orb

= 6.72 ± 0.01 h (Kang et al. 2006)

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- QPOs – vertical thickening in acc disc – eclipsing or reflecting the light

- only 4 detections of QPOs in X-ray:

- VW Hyi, 63 – 68 s (van der Woerd et al. 1987)

- SS Cyg, 83 s

- U Gem, 585 s

(Mauche 1997)

(Cordova and Mason 1984)

- OY Car, 2240 s (Ramsay et al. 2001)

- our periods: 1292 – 1391 s

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- QPOs – vertical thickening in acc disc – eclipsing or reflecting the light

- only 4 detections of QPOs in X-ray:

- VW Hyi, 63 – 68 s (van der Woerd et al. 1987)

- SS Cyg, 83 s

- U Gem, 585 s

(Mauche 1997)

(Cordova and Mason 1984)

- OY Car, 2240 s (Ramsay et al. 2001)

- our periods: 1292 – 1391 s

- time scale of rotating vertical thickening in acc.disc, a Keplerian frequency

=> SS Cyg, VW Hyi

=> U Gem

~ 10

~ 10

9

10

cm

cm – too far, region not emitting X-rays

=> V4743 Sgr

=> OY Car

~ 10

~ 10

10

10

cm – too far, region not emitting X-rays

cm – too far, region not emitting X-rays

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- beating between white dwarf rotation in X-ray with vertical thickening rotating in the inner disc radiating as QPOs in X-ray f beat

= f

QPOs

– f spin

=> f

QPOs

= f beat

+ f spin

≈ 680 s ( f spin

= 0.75 mHz)

=> distance of the QPOs source to ~ 10 10 cm – too far, not X-ray

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- eclipse of the central X-ray source (WD) by vertical thickening in the acc.disc...OY Car case

- OY Car

- eclipsing system, periodic dip detected in X-ray

- inclination high enough, i = 83.3°

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- eclipse of the central X-ray source (WD) by vertical thickening in the acc.disc...OY Car case

- OY Car

- eclipsing system, periodic dip detected in X-ray

- inclination high enough, i = 83.3°

- V4743 Sgr

- eclipse unprobable, periodic dips undetected in X-ray (P orb

= 24.1 ks)

- very narrow and shallow eclipse like feature in optical data

- partial eclise of the acc.disc edge by the secondary

=> inclination not enough to eclipse the WD by the secondary

=> inclination not enough for a vertical thickening to eclipse the WD

Interpretation – before day 526 – QPOs?

- eclipse of the central X-ray source (WD) by vertical thickening in the acc.disc...OY Car case

- OY Car

- eclipsing system, periodic dip detected in X-ray

- inclination high enough, i = 83.3°

- V4743 Sgr

- eclipse unprobable, periodic dips undetected in X-ray (P orb

= 24.1 ks)

- very narrow and shallow eclipse like feature in optical data

- partial eclise of the acc.disc edge by the secondary

=> inclination not enough to eclipse the WD by the secondary

=> inclination not enough for a vertical thickening to eclipse the WD

=> QPOs unlikely!

Interpretation – before day 526 – WD pulsations?

- the central accretor after nova explosion resembles PN nuclei

- PN nuclei

- pulsations 1000 – 5000 s (Ciardullo and Bond 1996)

- frequencies changing, ex. NGC 246, 0.01 mHz/1 month

- frequency change in V4743 Sgr, 0.01 mHz/2 weeks

Interpretation – before day 526 – WD pulsations?

- the central accretor after nova explosion resembles PN nuclei

- PN nuclei

- pulsations 1000 – 5000 s (Ciardullo and Bond 1996)

- frequencies changing, ex. NGC 246, 0.01 mHz/1 month

- frequency change in V4743 Sgr, 0.01 mHz/2 weeks

1 - instabilities in hydrogen burning shells (Sastri and Simon 1973)

- typical periods much shorter than our case, ~10 s

- RS Oph case with 35s X-ray oscillations (Beardmore et al. 2009)

=> unlikely

Interpretation – before day 526 – WD pulsations?

- the central accretor after nova explosion resembles PN nuclei

- PN nuclei

- pulsations 1000 – 5000 s (Ciardullo and Bond 1996)

- frequencies changing, ex. NGC 246, 0.01 mHz/1 month

- frequency change in V4743 Sgr, 0.01 mHz/2 weeks

1 - instabilities in hydrogen burning shells (Sastri and Simon 1973)

- typical periods much shorter than our case, ~10 s

- RS Oph case with 35s X-ray oscillations (Beardmore et al. 2009)

=> unlikely

2 - instabilities in partial ionisation zone of C and O (Starrfield et al. 1984)

- GW Vir isolated hot WD case

- deep absorption lines of C and O in V4743 Sgr (Ness et al. 2009)

- C-O WD with enough C and O?

=> possible

Interpretation – before day 526 – WD pulsations?

- pulsation frequency correlation with temperature (Kjeldsen and Bedding 1995)

- for hydrostatic equilibrium and for stellar atmospheres

- ratio of frequencies

(f

1

/ f

2

) 2 = T

2

/ T

1

Interpretation – before day 526 – WD pulsations?

- pulsation frequency correlation with temperature (Kjeldsen and Bedding 1995)

- for hydrostatic equilibrium and for stellar atmospheres

- ratio of frequencies

(f

1

/ f

2

) 2 = T

2

/ T

1

- agreement for days

180, 302, 371

- disagreement for days

196, 526, 742, 1286

T bb

in 10 3 K

Conclusion

- WD pulsations

- present before day 526

- during SSS phase f-T relation valid, except for:

- after strong decline in 180 (day 196)

- decline from SSS (day 526)

- none after SSS phase (after day 526)

Conclusion

- WD pulsations

- present before day 526

- during SSS phase f-T relation valid, except for:

- after strong decline in 180 (day 196)

- decline from SSS (day 526)

- none after SSS phase (after day 526)

- WD rotation

- during SSS phase– modulation buried in the overall brightness

- after SSS phase –visible and dominant

=> an intermediate polar candidate

Questions

- what is the strong decline during day 180? (observed also in RS Oph, ...)

Questions

- what is the strong decline during day 180?

- why is the f-T relation valid during the SSS phase?

- the same origine as stellar atmospheres in hydrostatic equilibrium?

- “quasihydrostatic” equilibrium?

- after strong decline in 180 (day 196) or decline from SSS (day 526)

- f-T relation not valid

- out of “quasihydrostatic” equilibrium?

- approaching frequencies during days 180 and 196 merged into one?

- why are the frequencies of pulsations and of the WD rotation so similar?

End thank you for...

...attention

...collaboration

...opportunity

...funding

...lunch

...

Download