| Summary of Past Performance | Key Figures in EUR million 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 8,405 8,758 8,818 8,308 7,340 6 8 – 4 – 1 6 13 7 79 79 78 80 81 78 78 45.6 42.8 39.6 40.3 39.0 38.0 35.5 1,893 1,807 1,688 1,646 1,663 1,480 1,411 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 294 382 378 358 333 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 3.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.5 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 320 299 257 281 223 As percentage of capital expenditure 65 74 109 78 68 78 67 7,435 6,901 6,443 6,173 6,276 5,950 5,325 Year-to-year change in % International sales revenue proportion (%) Employees (in thousands at 01.01. of the following year) Personnel expenses* Balance sheet total Fixed assets and non-current financial assets 2,655 2,688 2,496 2,349 2,374 2,259 Group A nnual Repor t 2011 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Group) Group Annual Report 2011 Total Commitment. Top Performance. 1,957 in EUR million 2011 2010 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 Year-to-year change in % 6 8 79 79 EBITDA * 943 1,052 EBIT * 647 754 Profit before tax 538 691 Consolidated net profit 373 465 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 65 74 Balance sheet total 7,435 6,901 Equity 2,409 2,408 32 35 International sales revenue proportion (%) 1,305 1,226 1,032 1,074 1,103 1,019 828 Trade receivables from sales of goods and services and other current assets 2,691 2,199 1,954 2,031 2,053 2,052 1,655 Equity 2,409 2,408 2,535 2,396 2,372 2,057 1,859 32 35 39 39 38 35 35 As percentage of total equity and liabilities Provisions 1,760 1,857 1,702 1,593 1,673 1,709 1,581 EBITDA* 943 1,052 905 867 949 868 768 EBIT* 647 754 585 568 692 587 542 Profit before tax Consolidated net profit 538 373 691 465 517 324 510 311 637 411 542 372 500 386 *2005 – 2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H Inventories As percentage of capital investment As percentage of total equity and liabilities *2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expenditure and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H | Summary of Past Performance | Key Figures in EUR million 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 8,405 8,758 8,818 8,308 7,340 6 8 – 4 – 1 6 13 7 79 79 78 80 81 78 78 45.6 42.8 39.6 40.3 39.0 38.0 35.5 1,893 1,807 1,688 1,646 1,663 1,480 1,411 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 294 382 378 358 333 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 3.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.5 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 320 299 257 281 223 As percentage of capital expenditure 65 74 109 78 68 78 67 7,435 6,901 6,443 6,173 6,276 5,950 5,325 Year-to-year change in % International sales revenue proportion (%) Employees (in thousands at 01.01. of the following year) Personnel expenses* Balance sheet total Fixed assets and non-current financial assets 2,655 2,688 2,496 2,349 2,374 2,259 Group A nnual Repor t 2011 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Group) Group Annual Report 2011 Total Commitment. Top Performance. 1,957 in EUR million 2011 2010 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 Year-to-year change in % 6 8 79 79 EBITDA * 943 1,052 EBIT * 647 754 Profit before tax 538 691 Consolidated net profit 373 465 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 65 74 Balance sheet total 7,435 6,901 Equity 2,409 2,408 32 35 International sales revenue proportion (%) 1,305 1,226 1,032 1,074 1,103 1,019 828 Trade receivables from sales of goods and services and other current assets 2,691 2,199 1,954 2,031 2,053 2,052 1,655 Equity 2,409 2,408 2,535 2,396 2,372 2,057 1,859 32 35 39 39 38 35 35 As percentage of total equity and liabilities Provisions 1,760 1,857 1,702 1,593 1,673 1,709 1,581 EBITDA* 943 1,052 905 867 949 868 768 EBIT* 647 754 585 568 692 587 542 Profit before tax Consolidated net profit 538 373 691 465 517 324 510 311 637 411 542 372 500 386 *2005 – 2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H Inventories As percentage of capital investment As percentage of total equity and liabilities *2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expenditure and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH was founded in 1967 as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, and Siemens AG, Berlin/Munich. The company is now the third-largest home appliances manufacturer worldwide, and number one in Europe, with sales of EUR 9.654 billion in 2011. The Group’s product portfolio spans the entire spectrum of modern domestic appliances. It ranges from stoves, ovens and extractor hoods to dishwashers, washers and dryers, fridges and freezers to small appliances (Consumer Products) such as vacuum cleaners, coffee machines, kettles, irons and hairdryers. On December 31, 2011 the Munich-based group had 42 factories across Europe, Asia llflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480. and North America as well as a global network of sales and customer service outlets in almost 50 countries. BSH employed over 45,600 people in 2011, with over 70 percent of these in Europe. In spring 2012, BSH was ranked as a top employer in Germany by the CRF Institute in the sixth consecutive year; the company also achieved this top accolade for the first time in Poland and the Netherlands. BSH was awarded first place in the innovation management category of the top employer ranking for engineers. Main Brands Special Brands Regional Brands Bosch and Siemens: these two brands are known worldwide and have a long history, underpinning our international success. Bosch stands for reliable, durable products; Siemens stands for innovation, leading-edge technology and quality design. The BSH brand portfolio includes the special brands Gaggenau and Neff, Thermador, Constructa, Viva, Ufesa and Junker. These ensure we meet the wide-ranging requirements of our various customers. Regional brands are the market leaders which garner respect in their countries of origin. Brands with which our regional consumers particularly identify include Balay in Spain, Pitsos in Greece, Profilo in Turkey and Coldex in Peru. Such brands help strengthen BSH’s position in these countries. | BSH Worldwide • Helsinki Oslo • Environmental and climate protection have always been firmly anchored in the Group‘s corporate strategy. BSH’s energy- and watersaving household appliances contribute to the efficient use of resources. We have listed our most efficient appliances in a Super Efficiency Portfolio since 2009. BSH has also set itself a 2015 target to reduce resource use in manufacturing and administration by 25 percent. • St. Petersburg • Stockholm • Moscow • Ballerup TM TM • Toronto Irvine New Bern • La Follette Casablanca • • Tel Aviv • Dubai • Jeddah • Mumbai • Mexico City Chuzhou • Seoul • Nanjing Wuxi Milton Keynes • • Hong Kong Kabinburi • Bangkok • Amsterdam Nauen Brussels • Berlin • Warsaw Lódź • Kiev Bad Neustadt • Prague Luxembourg • Bretten • Michalovce Giengen • Regensburg Paris • Munich Lipsheim Dillingen Traunreut• Vienna• Budapest Geroldswil • • Kuala Lumpur • Singapore Lima • Nazarje • São Paulo Buenos Aires • • Montevideo Milan • • Johannesburg Melbourne • Auckland • Santander Vitoria • Huarte Estella Esquiroz Zaragoza • La Cartuja Montañana • Bucharest Çerkezköy • Istanbul • Lisbon • Athens Flexibilität und Freizügigkeit. Mit dem Vollflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480 von Gaggenau ist erstmals die gesamte Kochzone nutzbar. Das Kochgeschirr wird automatisch erkannt und dort erhitzt, wo es gerade steht. Group Headquarters • Subsidiaries Factories: Cooking Refrigeration/Freezing Dishwashing Washing/Drying Consumer Products Motors, pumps BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH was founded in 1967 as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, and Siemens AG, Berlin/Munich. The company is now the third-largest home appliances manufacturer worldwide, and number one in Europe, with sales of EUR 9.654 billion in 2011. The Group’s product portfolio spans the entire spectrum of modern domestic appliances. It ranges from stoves, ovens and extractor hoods to dishwashers, washers and dryers, fridges and freezers to small appliances (Consumer Products) such as vacuum cleaners, coffee machines, kettles, irons and hairdryers. On December 31, 2011 the Munich-based group had 42 factories across Europe, Asia llflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480. and North America as well as a global network of sales and customer service outlets in almost 50 countries. BSH employed over 45,600 people in 2011, with over 70 percent of these in Europe. In spring 2012, BSH was ranked as a top employer in Germany by the CRF Institute in the sixth consecutive year; the company also achieved this top accolade for the first time in Poland and the Netherlands. BSH was awarded first place in the innovation management category of the top employer ranking for engineers. Main Brands Special Brands Regional Brands Bosch and Siemens: these two brands are known worldwide and have a long history, underpinning our international success. Bosch stands for reliable, durable products; Siemens stands for innovation, leading-edge technology and quality design. The BSH brand portfolio includes the special brands Gaggenau and Neff, Thermador, Constructa, Viva, Ufesa and Junker. These ensure we meet the wide-ranging requirements of our various customers. Regional brands are the market leaders which garner respect in their countries of origin. Brands with which our regional consumers particularly identify include Balay in Spain, Pitsos in Greece, Profilo in Turkey and Coldex in Peru. Such brands help strengthen BSH’s position in these countries. | BSH Worldwide • Helsinki Oslo • Environmental and climate protection have always been firmly anchored in the Group‘s corporate strategy. BSH’s energy- and watersaving household appliances contribute to the efficient use of resources. We have listed our most efficient appliances in a Super Efficiency Portfolio since 2009. BSH has also set itself a 2015 target to reduce resource use in manufacturing and administration by 25 percent. • St. Petersburg • Stockholm • Moscow • Ballerup TM TM • Toronto Irvine New Bern • La Follette Casablanca • • Tel Aviv • Dubai • Jeddah • Mumbai • Mexico City Chuzhou • Seoul • Nanjing Wuxi Milton Keynes • • Hong Kong Kabinburi • Bangkok • Amsterdam Nauen Brussels • Berlin • Warsaw Lódź • Kiev Bad Neustadt • Prague Luxembourg • Bretten • Michalovce Giengen • Regensburg Paris • Munich Lipsheim Dillingen Traunreut• Vienna• Budapest Geroldswil • • Kuala Lumpur • Singapore Lima • Nazarje • São Paulo Buenos Aires • • Montevideo Milan • • Johannesburg Melbourne • Auckland • Santander Vitoria • Huarte Estella Esquiroz Zaragoza • La Cartuja Montañana • Bucharest Çerkezköy • Istanbul • Lisbon • Athens Flexibilität und Freizügigkeit. Mit dem Vollflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480 von Gaggenau ist erstmals die gesamte Kochzone nutzbar. Das Kochgeschirr wird automatisch erkannt und dort erhitzt, wo es gerade steht. Group Headquarters • Subsidiaries Factories: Cooking Refrigeration/Freezing Dishwashing Washing/Drying Consumer Products Motors, pumps 118 Total Commitment. Top Performance. With Responsibility. Excellent, committed employees are what characterizes BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, today more than ever. They are the power behind the strong performance of our products and solutions and therefore form the foundation for our economic success. It is one of our fundamental principles, which we have internalized, that every­thing we do must demonstrate our commitment to society and the environment. Our Annual and Sustainability Reports will show how economic success and responsible action are mutually interdependent. Both reports are available as pdf versions on the Internet at: www.bsh-group.com | B S H st a y s th e c o u r s e In what was a difficult financial year, BSH once again managed to exceed its The latest Sustainability Report will be available from mid-June 2012. revenue expectations and generate positive earnings. This confirms that we have embarked on the right path. Thanks to the development of attractive home appliances that deliver top performance with low energy consumption, we can stay on track even in turbulent times. BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Carl-Wery-Strasse 34, 81739 Munich, Germany Tel. +49 89 4590-01 Fax +49 89 4590-2347 www.bsh-group.com Media contact: Corporate Communications Tel. +49 89 4590-2809 Fax +49 89 4590-2128 corporate.communications@bshg.com The Annual Report and the following further publications are available in German and English: • Sustainability Report 2011 • Our Super Efficiency Portfolio 2011 • BSH at a Glance 2012 This report was printed climate neutrally on FSC-certified Hello Silk paper. Right of amendment reserved, errors excepted. Printed in Germany. May 2012. © BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH. Reproduction and use in all media, whether complete or in part, subject to approval. 2 I N D E P E N D E N T A U D I T O R S ’ R E P O R T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S | Contents | Independent Auditors’ Report We have audited the consolidated financial statements prepared by BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich, comprising the balance sheet, the income statement and statement of comprehensive income, the cash flow statement, the statement of changes in equity and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and management report for the business year from January 1 to December 31, 2011. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and group management report according to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the European Union (EU), and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to § 315a (1) HGB (German Commercial Code) are the responsibility of the parent company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and on the group management report based on our audit. 8 12 4| Foreword 8| The Art of Coffee At the BSH plant in Traunreut, Bavaria, Andreas Liebl and his team busy themselves perfecting the technology to create expert espresso, with an optimum crema on top. With the passion of an Italian barista, the team strive to get the best aroma from their beans. 12| Cultural Program At the BSH Technology Center for Laundry Care in Berlin, Kathrin Redlin creates washing cycles for a globalized world. Because laundry habits vary from culture to culture. 16| Follow the Trail At BSH in Bad Neustadt, Bavaria, Roland Illig and his team are on the trail of lost energy in the Floor Care Development Center. Their detective work has uncovered a particularly efficient vacuum cleaner. 20| Globetrotters Across China by freight train: Christoph Rohr knows the stresses BSH appliances must endure. He uses his understanding to develop the ideal packaging. 24| A Source of Inspiration At the BSH site in Hoofddorp, near Amsterdam, Ronald Wassenaar re­ volutionizes the kitchen-planning process. He and his team of advisors cater to customers’ individual wishes so they find the appliances that best fit their desires. Afterwards they plan the rest of the kitchen. We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with § 317 HGB and German generally accepted standards for the audit of financial statements promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (Institute of Public Auditors in Germany). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit such that misstatements materially affecting the presentation of the net assets, financial position, and results of operations in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework and in the group management report are detected with reasonable assurance. Knowledge of the business activities and the economic and legal environment of the Group and expectations as to possible misstatements are taken into account in the determination of audit procedures. The effectiveness of the accounting-related internal control system and the evidence supporting the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and the group management report are examined primarily on a test basis within the framework of the audit. The audit includes assessing the annual financial statements of those entities included in consolidation, the determination of entities to be included in consolidation, the accounting and consolidation principles used, and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and the group management report. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit has not led to any reservations. In our opinion, based on the findings of our audit, the consolidated financial statements of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich, comply with IFRS, as adopted by the EU, the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to § 315a (1) HGB and give a true and fair view of the net assets, financial position and results of operations of the group in accordance with these requirements. The group management report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and as a whole provides a suitable view of the group’s position and suitably presents the opportunities and risks of future development. Munich, April 5, 2012 Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (Prof. Dr. Plendl) Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Public Auditor) (Prosig) Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Public Auditor) 117 | CONT ENT S 16 28| Essay Energy efficiency is the key to implementing the energy transition in Germany. By Dr. Kurt-Ludwig Gutberlet, Chairman of the Board of Management 20 24 33| Supervisory Board Report 72 | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 72 Accounting Policies 82 Notes to the Consolidated Statement of Income 87 Notes to the Balance Sheet 112 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Fixed Assets 35| Board of Management, Supervisory Board 116| Shareholdings of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH 36| Group Management Report 37 Development of Business 53 Net Assets, Financial Position and Results of Operations 59 Management of Opportunities and Risks 63Outlook 117| Independent Auditors’ Report 65| Consolidated Financial Statements 66 Consolidated Statement of Income 67 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 68 Consolidated Balance Sheet 70 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 71 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 118| Imprint | BSH Worldwide | Summary of Past Performance 3 4 The BSH Board of Management: (from left to right) Jean Dufour, Winfried Seitz, Johannes Närger and Dr. Kurt-Ludwig Gutberlet | FOREWORD BSH Stays the Course Fiscal 2011 was no easy year for the global economy. Although recovery from the global financial crisis initially continued, the second half of the year was increasingly affected by the EU debt crisis. The economic difficulties, which led to declines in demand in several traditional markets in Western Europe, were exacerbated by turbulences in the foreign exchange markets, which cannot remain without consequences for a globally operating company like BSH. Despite this difficult economic environment, BSH succeeded in exceeding its revenue expec­ tations with a year-on-year increase of more than six percent in group sales to 9.654 billion euros. This positive development was attributable, among other things, to our home market. The German economy enjoyed growth despite the deteriorating debt crisis in Europe, and we were able to benefit more than most from this development. The market for home appliances in Germany has shown encouragingly robust growth, and we have been able to consolidate our domestic position even further. Thanks to strong figures for built-in appliances and the increasing demand for energy-efficient models, BSH has been able to post an eight percent rise in sales. As a result, our sales in Germany crossed the two-billion euro mark for the first time in our company’s history. This confirms that we have embarked on the right path. BSH has already been investing for decades in the development and optimization of home appliances that combine maximum convenience and attractive product design with especially low resource consumption. This strategy requires a lot of stamina, which we indeed have, thanks to our ownership structure. The rising demand for our products proofs that we offer the right answers to counter mounting competition from manufacturers. By deciding to buy our products, consumers express their appreciation of the inventive spirit and persistence of our developers. In light of the international pioneering role that Germany wants to play in the transition to renewable energies, this trend fills us with confidence, also with regard to our growth oppor­tunities in other mature markets. However, the main growth drivers for BSH are outside of Germany. As in previous years, our business development in particular in Turkey and Russia was especially dynamic. Although these successes were diminished somewhat by negative exchange rate effects, we nevertheless posted a growth rate of 15.5 percent to over 1.8 billion euros in these Eastern European countries. In China, our sales rose by 20 percent despite a slowdown in the economic growth. Our business also developed very positively in the rest of Asia as well as in Australia and Oceania. We did, however, suffer declines in some Western European markets and in the U.S. While sales revenue in Western Europe fell slightly, due primarily to the effects of the debt crisis, the revenue decline in the U.S. was caused predominantly by our exit from the 27-inch segment in laundry care and the development of the U.S. dollar. Overall, BSH once again managed to generate an encouraging consolidated net profit of 373 million euros in this volatile environment in the year under review. To maintain and strengthen our position among the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers, we not only invested 5 6 just under 300 million euros in research and development in the year under review, but also 453 million euros in new products, new production plants and in extending capacity at existing factories in Germany and abroad. True to our sustainable growth strategy, we paid strict attention to maintaining a sound financial position with low third-party indebtedness in these endeavors. Our solid financials and positive outlook were also recognized by international rating agency Standard & Poor’s, which confirmed our good credit rating and our outstanding creditworthiness. Our stable profitability, a strong competitive position, the development lead in energy-efficient appliances, a global market and manufacturing presence, and the sound financial position give us the certainty that BSH will also be able to stay on track in the future, and not just under “fair weather” conditions. For fiscal 2012, we expect at best a stagnating market in Western Europe, with the exception of Germany, where we forecast a slight increase. Growth rates in China of, in part, more than 20 percent are most likely to be a thing of the past, and growth in Eastern Europe is expected to be slightly below the figure for the previous year. Business per­formance over the first few months of 2012 confirms that we face increasingly difficult market development. Despite this fact, we aim at continuing to increase our sales revenue in 2012. Dr. Kurt-Ludwig Gutberlet Jean Dufour Johannes Närger Winfried Seitz | T otal C ommitment Comprehensive service, intelligent solutions for transport and logistics, technical perfection and the continuous optimization of our product portfolio. Our employees at all our sites put in every effort possible so that BSH can continue in future as a leading manufacturer of home appliances to generate added value for its customers and shareholders. 8 | the art of coffee Good coffee at the press of a button, quality without compromise, product intelligence for the best result. Inner values that often comprise decades of intensive development work. Despite all their knowledge of electronics, mechanics and thermodynamics, Andreas Liebl and his fellow employees at the Traunreut development center never forget what matters most: getting the best flavor from roasted coffee beans. 9 10 Smell, taste and touch – to sharpen their senses, Andreas Liebl (fourth from the left) and his fellow developers regularly test various kinds of coffee. After all, only someone with the passion of a barista can develop machines that turn out excellent coffee every time. With the Fiery Enthusiasm of an Italian Barista “That‘s it. That‘s what the perfect ‘crema’ looks like,” says Andreas Liebl while using his spoon to draw a half-moon in the golden brown layer of the espresso in front of him. He raises the spoon, and the countless mini­scule bubbles in the espresso cup immediately form a closed surface again. “That’s what makes the difference in turning an ordinary espresso into a superb one. And, after all, enjoyment is what we want to give to the customer.” This kind of commitment is what drives Liebl and his team of 100 coffee machine experts every day. BSH is one of the few manufacturers in the world that develop and produce the large part of the coffee machines’ important components in-house, like the brewing unit, the grinding gear, the engine or the electronics assembly. The team of developers is just as diverse as the product portfolio: engineers next to mechatronics specialists and young guns next to old hands. Together they make sure that their machines produce coffee with superb flavor and aroma. Their benchmark is the professional barista – the enthusiastic coffee artisan who fulfills every customer‘s wishes with style, elegance and, most of all, precision. It takes only a few seconds for a modern coffee machine to turn beans and water into the perfect cup of coffee – whether it‘s a full-bodied espresso, a perfectly layered latte macchiato, or a cappuccino with creamy milk foam that sticks to the spoon. To make sure that the result tastes as good as it does in the bistros of Rome, Milan or Naples, even the smallest detail has to be just right: How does the ceramic grinder produce the perfect balance of coarsely and finely ground coffee beans? How can the machine build up the perfect water pressure? And how can it vary the water temperature by the second in order to extract the most flavor from each bean? “We test until everything fits together perfectly,” says Liebl, “because we want our cus­ tomers to get the perfect cup of coffee every time they use the machine.” Creating the Perfect Taste is a Matter of Technique Albert Ostermaier is one of the truly old hands at BSH. For 37 years he has been developing coffee machines for BSH. Today he is a specialist for the brewing unit. Brewing unit is a plain term for a highly complex component that takes care of lots of things: it holds back unwanted tannins and lets only the typical coffee flavors pass through. Ostermaier checks each individual part in the lab with a constant focus on what matters most: | T HE ART OF COF F EE the ­coffee’s taste. And whenever the seasoned engineer looks at the perfect goldenbrown ‘crema’, he still feels elated. Engineers Give a Bean for Coffee Beans These days, a sophisticated espresso machine has over 500 parts. It houses pre­cisely adjusted sensors, microchips and circuit boards. The interior is similar to a high-performance computer. The interaction of mechanical and electronic components is becoming increasingly complex. “The machine knows when the bean container is empty, when it needs water or when parts need cleaning,” explains developer Joachim Knauer. That’s why the team comprises more and more trained mechatronics technicians who know their way around moving parts and their controls. Engineers and mechatronics technicians also take part in regular tasting seminars. After all, they want to develop products that coffee lovers will be eager to purchase. And since the whole process of preparing excellent coffee should be as easy as poss­ ible, new machines froth the milk and brew the coffee in a single step. Their design has also been improved, so that cups and glasses of any size now fit underneath the spout. And the machines are so intuitive to use that press­ing a single button is usually all it takes. Small details, but together they make a huge difference. Maximum convenience is also a major selling point for the latest models in the Tassimo line of hot beverage systems. The machines use special pods called T Discs for many different kinds of beverages, including tea and hot chocolate, from many well-known brands. With Tassimo, BSH provides the tailor-made answer to changing lifestyles: “More and more people want to enjoy coffee in different variations at home,” says Dr. Stephan Straub, who heads the department in which Tassimo products are developed. A Barcode that Says It All The small, intelligent beverage systems are very popular. Since BSH hit the market in 2008, the sales volume has doubled to two million machines. Its unique feature is the barcode on each T Disc, which tells the machine instantly which program it needs to run to turn its contents into aromatic tea, flavorful coffee or tasty hot chocolate. The barcode determines the proper temperature curve and the correct amount of water. Needless to say, the espresso T Disc also delivers the perfect ‘crema’ every time – the team in Traunreut wouldn’t be satisfied with anything less. Left: Albert Ostermaier makes sure that the coffee develops its full aroma. With the brewing unit he extracts the coffee’s aroma and ensures the perfect flavor. Right: Dr. Stephan Straub and his team develop Tassimo multi-beverage machines, which prepare coffee, tea and cocoa. 11 12 | C ultural P rogram Action, easy going or turbo – Kathrin Redlin designs a wide variety of programs for a global audience. Not for radio or television, but for washing machines. With her software she makes sure that the machines best meet the needs of the various international markets. The right temperature or spin speed depends not only on the properties of the fabrics being washed, but primarily on what is customary in different cultures. 13 14 Dr. Andreas Hanau and Kathrin Redlin check the laundry’s cleanliness. Although laundry habits differ greatly around the world, there’s one thing that customers want most of all: really clean laundry. Sophisticated Technologies for Today’s Markets BSH’s new Technology Center for Laundry Care in Berlin is a modern, futuristic-looking building with a bright and shiny exterior. Here, 700 employees, half of them engineers or technicians, develop the washers and dryers of the future. They provide answers for global and regional laundry trends. Nothing on a new washing machine is left to chance – neither the number or names of the program cycles nor the size or looks of the exterior. And certainly not the sound the machine makes in the spin cycle. Kathrin Redlin is one of the creative minds in this facility. She develops the various programs that consumers can select by pressing a button or turning a rotary knob. Her résumé could not fit better: She started out as a dress­maker, learning everything there is to know about fabrics and how to handle them. She then learned programming as a data pro­cessing specialist, and finally she completed a course of studies in clothing engineering. Redlin knows exactly how fabrics respond to different temperatures, water quantities and cycle lengths. She also knows how certain laundry customs come about. “We absorb a lot from our parents,” she explains. In the USA, for example, people like to wash their clothes frequently, and often in cold water and in short cycles. Greeks, on the other hand, appreciate the cycle with extra-hot water. In India, “hand wash” does not mean gentle cleaning, but rather the thorough kneading and beating of heavily soiled clothes. Only nine percent of Germans use the pre-wash cycle, but virtually no one would purchase a machine without this option. Whether hot or cold, short or long – at the end of the day, everyone wants their laundry to come out perfectly clean. The developers at BSH know that the top purchasing criterion for a washing machine is cleaning performance. Regional Challenges Since BSH sells its products all over the world, Redlin also concerns herself with traditional clothing from other cultures. Currently her focus is on saris, the colorful wraps often made from artfully woven silk which are worn by Indian women. “The goal is to wash the long fabric bands in such a way that they don’t come out the machine in one huge knot,” explains the 43-year-old. In 2012 BSH starts erecting a factory for washing machines in India, the engineers need to master many challenges for the Indian market: power failures, strongly fluctuating water line pressures or power plugs that are shaped differently in almost every region must not impair the washing performance. | C U LT U R A L P R O G R A M “The trick is to come up with the easiest possible answers to a wide range of requirements,” explains engineer Dr. Andreas Hanau. That’s why BSH develops appliances that share the same basic structure and adds details for regional customization. One such example is Russia, where customers prefer machines that are not as deep as those in most other countries, because space is at a premium in their often tight apartments. In response, the developers are designing a kind of washing machine kit that comprises housing and drum components with different depths. To build deeper models, they simply use longer components for the housing and the drum than for the more space-saving models. Customers get what they want, and the efficient building block kit saves time, material and money in terms of development and production. The Kit Principle The developers are also working hard to turn out washing machines that produce the perfect sound, ranging from their normal operating noise to their acoustic signals. In China, for example, the machines are often located in living rooms and run predominantly in the evening hours, when electricity rates are lower. Since this is also the time when the family sits at the dinner table, Chinese customers prefer machines that are especially quiet. The path to a pleasant-sounding wash cycle leads through Wolfang Harbich’s sound lab, a well-insulated acoustic chamber that sits on springs in order to eliminate any interfering noise which might intrude from the outside. Here the washing machines sit in front of microphones, just like vocalists. “The spin cycle should never make a low, rumbling sound,” says Harbich. If a sound is perceived as displeasing, the user might think that the machine is malfunctioning – that’s why we are working so hard on designing perfect machine sounds.” Sound Tells the Story When it comes to developing new washers and dryers, sound provides important information about hidden weak spots. For example, Harbich has already been able to improve machine housings and motors with his work. Among his tools is even an acoustic camera, which converts sounds into images that are similar to those produced by heat-sensing cameras. They make every rattle and buzz visible and – most importantly – pinpoint their location so that technicians can figure out their cause. Whether the focus is on sound, volume, special wash programs or the pre-wash cycle: the BSH developers optimize washing machines to meet the needs of customers in all of the world’s regions and cultures. Left: At the Technology Center for Laundry Care in Berlin, around 700 employees have been developing the washers and dryers of the future since 2011. Right: The washing machine as a recording star. Wolfgang Harbich ensures not only that the prototype makes a pleasant sound – its acoustic emissions can also help detect even the most subtle potential for improvement. 15 16 | follow the trail In just a few years, Roland Illig and his team of developers at the BSH site in Bad Neustadt have managed to significantly reduce the power consumption of vacuum cleaners. While the discussion with regard to an EU energy label for vacuum cleaners is still ongoing, BSH is already developing particularly efficient models. With innovative nozzles, optimized interior air flow and new dust bags, the most energy-efficient Siemens model draws only 850 watts for strong cleaning performance. Whether it is our vacuum cleaners or our Super Efficiency Portfolio of appliances that already carry an EU label: in terms of energy efficiency, performance and convenience we deliver far more than we have to. 17 18 Here are the winners: Two vacuum cleaners developed by Roland Illig and his team were ranked in first place by Stiftung Warentest, Germany’s independent consumer product testing orga­ni­z­ ation in 2011 (issue 4/11). The organization praised, among other things, the appliances’ low power consumption – the result of sophisticated air stream design. Reclaiming Lost Energy The corpus delicti measures a mere few micrometers, comes in various colors and shapes and originates in birch forests, exhaust pipes or even sand storms: the dust particle. It takes a lot more than a magnifying glass to track it down, which is why it became a prime piece of evidence in the search for lost energy. Day after day, millions of people use vacuum cleaners that consume a lot more energy than they have to. Of the up to 2,000 watts which older models draw from the power grid, only one-fifth is used for the actual cleaning task in many cases. The team of 55 developers at the BSH site in Bad Neustadt decided to do something about this glaring inefficiency by using innovative detection methods to look for all this lost energy. Their air flow facility is their forensics lab, and their measuring probe is their magnifying glass. “To find out what happens inside the vacuum cleaner, the flow engineers took a close look at the path taken by each dust grain,” ex­plains Roland Illig, head of floor care development at BSH. What they found out is that a large portion of the energy is simply lost in turbulence. Each air stream also creates little vortexes at its edges, and vacuum cleaners are unfortunately no exception. “These vor- texes cause grains of dust to swirl around unnecessarily,” explains Illig. Making sure that they ultimately wind up in the dust bag takes extra energy, which turns vacuuming into an activity that wastes more electricity than it should. “Our goal is therefore to make sure that each dust grain arrives at its destination without vortex detours,” says Illig. Power Drains: Air Vortexes in Action Fluid mechanics allows engineers to precisely predict the flow of materials in enclosed systems. The path taken by a grain of dust is no exception. To compute the air flow within a vacuum cleaner hose, for example, a specialist needs only pen and paper – the calculation is relatively easy. With irregularly shaped components like the floor nozzle, things become a lot more difficult. To optimize the route taken by a dust particle in such parts, developers employ computer programs to compute the complex air flow and map it three-dimensionally. Based on the results of this detailed search, the developers are able to design vacuum cleaners that generate almost no vortexes in their interior. Thoroughly optimized floor nozzles aren’t the only thing that makes sure that energy-efficient models deliver strong cleaning performance in every corner and on any material. Even the dust bag, which used to be nothing | FOLLOW THE TR AIL but a simple paper contraption, today contributes to energy efficiency with the use of new high-performance materials. And sometimes it’s small product design modifications that make a vacuum cleaner more efficient, such as reducing the diameter of the wand by one millimeter or adding a fin in the model’s interior. In the past five years, BSH has submitted more than 40 patents on average for each new model series in Germany to protect innovations that reconcile convenience, performance and energy efficiency. This kind of development effort pays off. In just a few years, the engineers managed to double the efficiency of their vacuum cleaners. The most energy-efficient model from Siemens uses up to 64 percent less power than the brand’s older models. If it were to replace every vacuum cleaner in Germany, the energy saved would be enough to supply 2,500 average four-person households for an entire year. “Vacuum cleaners still offer huge potential as far as energy efficiency is concerned,” says Illig. One contributing factor will be the EU energy efficiency label, which already helps consumers today in selecting refrigerators and clothes dryers. Always That Bit More Efficient Although its details are still being discussed, BSH’s engineers are already working hard to make sure that their products will far exceed the new label’s requirements – just like the dryers, washing machines and refrigerators in BSH’s Super Efficiency Portfolio, that far ex­ceed the EU’s requirements in terms of energy consumption, performance and convenience. One prime example is the company’s heat pump dryer. Equipped with a condenser that flushes itself with the water collected from the laundry, it is the only appliance in its class that can guarantee long-term energy efficiency. Unlike competing models it does not need to be cleaned manually after every other cycle. That way, BSH delivers maximum convenience while making sure that the model’s energy efficiency does not suffer. Stiftung Warentest, Germany’s leading consumer watchdog, agreed and gave the model the highest rating in its test in January 2012. Double Test Win Two vacuum cleaner models from BSH recently won top ratings as well: the Siemens Z 3.0 among traditional models and the Bosch Roxx’x among bagless models. This kind of success is no accident, but the result of tireless development work. In the labs at BSH, new models have to deliver not only under the standard conditions like those used by Stiftung Warentest. “We conduct a whole series of additional tests, which are based on the findings of our customer service organi­z­ ation,” says Illig. Animal hairs on rough sisal fibers or cookie crumbs in deep-pile carpeting – BSH vacuum cleaners have to deliver clean­ing performance even under the toughest conditions. “Performance is everything when it comes to ensuring that customers are completely satisfied with our models,” says Illig. That’s why the energy detectives at BSH’s air flow lab are working so hard to leave the competition in the dust. The self-cleaning heat pump dryer is the only one of its kind that maintains its energy efficiency rating over the long term. Mechatronic technician Alex Volk uses a prototype to demonstrate those parts of the test winner that are critical for the automatic self-cleaning process. 19 20 | G lobetrotters On their trip from the factory to the customer, appliances often travel across entire continents. They must be able to withstand heat, cold, humidity and rough handling without suffering any damage. Christoph Rohr from BSH‘s distribution logistics department has analyzed the shipping routes and all the challenges they face. In his lab he can simulate the trip in a railcar across the Siberian tundra just as easily as a truck shipment across India or a ride on a bicycle rickshaw over bumpy country roads. With optimized packaging, all appliances will make it to their destinations without a scratch. 21 22 Christoph Rohr has made unloading containers faster and more efficient: Thanks to his Slip Tarp, a patented floor covering that is unrolled in the container before loading, loads can now be pulled out in one piece. Home Appliances on Tour: The Right Travel Outfit Makes the Difference When they sit on the showroom floor it is impossible to tell that each appliance was once a passenger. In many cases they have traveled for thousands of miles on trucks, in ships, in railcars or on the bicycle rickshaws of Asian customers. Especially on long trips they have to withstand a lot: Vibrations on potholed streets; temperatures ranging from minus 30 to plus 80 degrees Celsius; high humidity when containers are loaded, which rains down on the printed boxes once the air cools down on the open sea. It is not unusual for the appliances to be subjected to g-forces of up to 11 g’s when trucks hit potholes or railcars are switched. The fact that the appliances nevertheless make it to their destination unscathed is not luck, but is thanks to the experience of BSH’s packaging experts. In various tests they subject the products and their travel outfits of paper, plastic and styrofoam to the same conditions they will encounter in a container and on the road. They make sure that the customers’ enjoyment of their new appliance will not be diminished by scratches or dents. “At some point we began to question everything,” says Christoph Rohr, who developed the packaging tests. “We looked at the most common testing methods and realized that they have very little to do with reality. That’s when we started to look at what really happens.” For the trained nautical and industrial engineer this meant hitting the road together with the appliances. For example, he accompanied the products and suffered the same bumps and vibrations when they were trucked across thousands of miles of roads in China and India. Robust and Lean The challenge: On the one hand, the appliances must be optimally protected. On the other, the packaging must not be too thick so that it takes up as little extra space as possible. This reduces the number of trips and protects the environment. Rohr’s pioneering trips were followed by systematically recording the road conditions. To accomplish this, he equipped trucks with measuring devices and GPS units. The combination of location data and vibration, temperature and humidity readings is used to create detailed trip profiles, which can | GLOBE TROT TERS then be displayed on an electronic map or used for stress tests. To run these tests, the BSH engineers simply place a new appliance on the vibrating table or into the climate chamber, and the virtual trip can begin. Based on the results, they can then design the right packaging for shipments anywhere in the world. Quick loading and unloading procedures are the goals of every logistician, because more speed means more productivity. Along the way, Rohr also invented a simple method for saving a lot of time when loading and unloading small appliances such as vacuum cleaners, toasters, etc. The innovation, which has been patented in the meantime, is called Slip Tarp – a carpet made of robust material that is rolled out in the container before the loading process. In the past, the products could be unloaded only through the narrow end of the container, which blocked the warehouse gates. Particularly with the large number of small products fitting into a container, this procedure took a relatively long time. The Slip Tarp allows all the contents to be pulled out of the container in three large blocks. Workers can now reach the units from all sides and quickly forward them to their next destination. Reaching the Destination and Sparing the Environment “While working on ways to speed up the un­loading process, I received a tote bag made from this special material at a trade show. And that is what gave me the idea,” explains Rohr. “I am glad that I had the opportunity to give it a try without knowing in advance whether it would work.” Such improvements are also possible because BSH conducts its global logistics operations mostly in-house. BSH pays attention not only to speed, but also to the environment. In Giengen, the company’s largest logistics center in Ger­ many, BSH maintains a special freight railway yard with a storage area for containers that would cover several soccer fields. From here, the containers ride piggyback to several large German ports, from where they are shipped all over the world. The share of rail freight is rising steadily. “In 2008 we made 25 percent of our shipments by rail. Today the figure’s already 45 percent,” says site manager Manfred Brauckmann. The benefit for the environment is that shipping by train instead of truck generates up to 60 percent less carbon dioxide. Safe, fast and green – the logistics engineers of BSH are mastering this ‘triple play’ to optimize their shipping activities. In doing so, they pay just as much strict attention to quality as their colleagues in development and production. From the logistics engineers’ point of view, it is a pity that the refrigerators and dishwashers cannot tell the customers about their travel adventures and the effort that went into making sure that they arrived at their destination safe and sound and on time. BSH coordinates most of its global logistics operations itself. Manfred Brauckmann (left) and Marco Passira make sure that all appliances reach their destination safely, quickly, and as environmentally friendly as possible. 23 24 | A S ource of I nspiration Since a built-in kitchen usually needs to last for the next ten to twenty years, Ronald Wassenaar and the team at the Dutch BSH subsidiary do everything in their power to help customers choose the solution that best suits their needs and will be enjoyed for many years to come. The “House of Inspiration” in Hoofddorp near Amsterdam invites dealers and private customers to acquaint themselves with the latest trends and product innovations in an inspiring setting. 25 26 The “House of Inspiration” on the outskirts of Amsterdam embodies BSH’s principles such as environmental protection and service orientation. In the facility’s four showrooms, customers and dealers can learn about the latest trends from Bosch, Siemens, Neff and Gaggenau, try out appliances in a playful manner or attend cooking classes. Inspiration for More Quality of Life Spider plants, white orchids, calla lilies – a wall of more than 2,000 plants stretches over three floors in the “House of Inspiration”, bringing living nature into the building and providing a pleasant atmosphere. The entire complex is covered by a glass roof with solar panels, flooding the atrium and the galleries on each floor with natural daylight. The “House of Inspiration” is innovative in every respect. It reflects the values and principles of BSH, such as innovation, customer service, employee orientation, responsibility for the environment and society, and sus­ tainable value creation. The building was designed and built according to the cradleto-cradle principle, which means that all materials and furnishings are recycled when they reach the end of their useful life. It also uses rainwater and solar energy. In addition, the facility is home to more than just the spacious showrooms, with its upper floors housing the workplaces of the 270 office staff who work for the Dutch subsidiary BSH Huishoudapparaten B.V. The concept of service has top priority in all areas – not only with regard to customers and dealers, but also in accounting, IT or marketing. Hospitality manager Hans van der Bilt and his team make sure that guests feel welcome as soon as they set foot in the building: A friendly glance, a freshly brewed latte macchiato, and consultants who provide information tailored to the customers’ needs – the trained hotel professional knows what people want. “Customers sense that when they come to us, they can sit back and relax as they plan a kitchen that really suits them,” says van der Bilt. Top Service as a Matter of Principle Nothing is for sale in the showrooms, however. “After all, we are not competitors, but partners for specialist dealers,” says marketing head Ronald Wassenaar. That is also why the “House of Inspiration” does not just target customers, but was also designed to meet the specific needs of dealers. Whether the specialist dealers are familiarizing themselves with new product features in entertaining cooking classes, learning about the latest trends in the training center or auditorium, or getting ideas about how to present the various brands in an attractive manner on limited floor space – they leave Hoofddorp inspired to drive their own business forward. Wassenaar also wants to revolutionize the decision-making process involved in buying a kitchen: “Today, customers give a lot of thought to finishes, work surfaces and cabinet layouts. Only once they have decided on the ‘look’ of the kitchen do they then quickly and randomly pick out appliances,” he says. They | A S O U R C E O F I NS P I R AT I O N Hospitality manager Hans van der Bilt and his team have one main mission – to perfectly cater to their customers’ needs. Based on their cooking and shopping habits, the BSH team can point out which appliances will work best for their particular needs. do not realize that it is the appliances that make all the difference when it comes to actually enjoying the kitchen. “Ideally, customers should therefore start out by selecting the appliances that best meet their way of life, their cooking habits and their demands in terms of user-friendliness, design and environmental compatibility, and then put together the right kitchen.” testing cubicle, customers can compare the noise of the latest dishwasher model with the kind of noise produced by a nearby freeway or gentle birdsong. And at an inter­active display, visitors can even throw pots and bottles against the glass front panels of appliances to see for themselves that they are scratch-proof. Four Brands under One Roof The “House of Inspiration” is the best place for this since the consultants cater for the individual needs of each customer. For example, selecting the right refrigerator depends not only on the size of the household, but also on the shopping frequency. “People who go to the grocery store only once a week will benefit in particular from the Vitafresh function, which keeps fruit and vegetables fresh longer,” says Wassenaar. Always Take the Customer’s Point of View But it’s not just about products either. The facility also demonstrates innovative design solutions – sometimes in a playful manner. For example, customers can use a magnetic wall to arrange the various kitchen elements and find the most ergonomic layout. “Before playing with this wall, some customers had no idea that they could install their dish­ washer at chest height to avoid having to keep bending down when loading and unloading dishes,” says Wassenaar. In a Unlike in Germany, where people tend to be more familiar with this marketing tool in the automotive sector, showrooms for kitchen appliances are quite common in the Netherlands. At BSH, the showrooms are part of an innovative customer relationship management concept. The goal is to target customers who are considering buying a kitchen and to cater for their individual needs over the long term. “Our particular strength lies in the fact that we can present four brands under one roof and allow people to experience them hands-on,” says Wassenaar. Customers who have spent a Saturday in the “House of Inspiration” leave Hoofddorp with the positive feeling that they have been able to gain a comprehensive overview of what the market has to offer. And ultimately it is the specialist dealers who also benefit from this concept: “Customers who have been to a showroom are already well-informed when they enter the store – and they also appreciate quality.” 27 28 | Essay | b y D r . K urt - L udwig G utberlet German industry as a whole has the potential to save 30 billion kilowatt hours of electricity. If all home appliances in Germany over 10 years old were updated, 15 billion kWh could be saved. A further 12.3 billion kWh could be saved in relation to home appliances through incentive schemes administered by German electricity suppliers. The transition of energy systems towards sustainability can only be achieved if energy is seen as part of regulatory policy. | E SS AY | Regulatory Policy Must Refocus on Energy Efficiency Energy efficiency and climate protection have been key to corporate strategy at BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH since it was established in 1967. In recent decades, these issues have grown in importance – not least due to Germany’s definitive withdrawal from nuclear power. The decision to phase out nuclear means that, by 2022 at the latest, Germany will have something in common with most other countries in the world. No nuclear power, almost no fossil fuels of its own, and more questions than answers in terms of the financing and utilization of alternative energy sources. At the same time, the current IEA World Energy Outlook estimates that global energy consumption will actually rise by at least one third by 2035. A paradigm shift: Promote energy saving not energy production The question is therefore now much more pressing than previously: how can energy demand be reduced without hampering economic growth? In our approach to energy production, we remain transfixed like a rabbit in the headlights. Energy efficiency is only gradually being considered an important part of the energy transition. The focus of our concern should shift from what we can produce to what we can avoid producing. Energy efficiency is not only a short-term answer to the pressing gap in energy supply, but also a long-term opportunity to use energy more productively. In the interest of climate protection by 2020, the EU plans to reduce its energy consumption by 20 percent compared with 1990 levels. Yet according to estimates by the European Commission, without additional measures being taken, only half of this reduction target will be achieved. The German federal government has set an even higher target of 40 percent reduction by 2020. Yet a wide gap is emerging between the words spoken by politics and industry and their deeds. Other EU countries are providing significant support for these reductions, but Germany is dragging its feet. The reduction target is an urgent necessity and cannot be achieved simply by the sum of reasonable measures taken individually. We need fresh thinking in terms of regulatory policy. The energy transition requires a shift in regulatory policy: electricity companies must be included in the obligation if we are to achieve the EU reduction target. Saving energy is also worthwhile from a financial perspective. Production costs per kilowatt hour in Germany are on average three times as high as the cost of re­ducing consumption by the same amount. Despite the variation between conditions in different countries, energy efficiency remains the neatest way to defuse the worldwide energy problem. Energy efficiency is attractive because it does not require consumers to do without the home comforts they are used to. It is politically workable, because it does not elicit resistance in the same way as the construction of wind farms or new overhead power lines. Above all, it is quick and can be achieved with today’s technology. “Production costs per kWh in Germany are three times as high as the cost of reducing consumption by the same amount.” However, we must not get carried away: energy efficiency operates at different speeds. The German corporate energy efficiency initiative (DENEFF) has identified an energysaving potential of 30 billion kWh in German industry. But each individual investment must be assessed against its outcome in terms of energy savings and in relation to the relevant 29 30 plant and process – a cumbersome administrative procedure with an uncertain outcome. It is much simpler to save electricity through home appliances. For 17 years, the European energy label has displayed a standard energy rating for each appliance. Domestic appliances have a high energy-efficiency potential because they make up 40% of household electricity consumption. If all domestic appliances in Germany over 10 years old were exchanged for highly efficient appliances, 15 billion kWh could be saved each year. Thus the potential for saving energy through the use of more efficient home appliances is equivalent to half of the potential savings from German industry. Across Europe, 30 percent of all household electrical appliances are over 10 years old. If all these appliances were replaced with highly efficient ones, an annual saving of 44 billion kWh could be achieved – the equivalent of Portugal’s annual energy consumption. “Intelligent regulatory policy does not mean distributing large amounts of public money.” Due to the great potential for energy saving in the household appliance sector, it would be worth politicians providing incentives here. The core message for a new energy efficiency policy could be summarized as: explain, promote, apply penalties and provide leadership. Explain: More clarity and distinction between efficiency classes Only very few consumers know the difference between the A and A+++ ratings. The top priority for responsible regulatory policy would therefore be to explain and clarify energy consumption and how to avoid it. This applies to all areas – from the whole-house Energy Performance Certificate to the light bulb. We note that labeling systems tend to develop and establish themselves worldwide, and advise interested governments and non-governmental organizations throughout the world on domestic appliances. It is true that an international comparator will remain just a dream for some time to come. Yet all systems should observe one major fundamental principle, namely that of taking technological progress into account. We therefore strongly support the dynamic updating of the energy label criteria. Above all, the nomenclature for energy standards must be clearer, allowing distinctions to be identified at a glance. Promote: Create incentives to buy Initially, it would seem that the simplest tool for motivating consumers to buy more effi­cient appliances would be a program of state support, i.e. a direct or indirect subsidy for the purchase of appliances in the highest efficiency class. For many years, we have been discussing this type of measures with policy makers. Compared to the eagerness with which subsidies are applied in other areas – the German government paid some EUR 9 billion to subsidize solar energy in 2011 – in this case modest sums could make a big difference. However, irrespective of the fact that the public purse is empty, there are other reasons to be skeptical of such programs. Intelligent regulatory policy does not mean distributing large amounts of public money: it also means using financial resources efficiently. Apply penalties: Implement minimum standards, eliminate energy guzzlers It would be more effective to ban inefficient appliances. But in the EU and elsewhere, it is clear that we are far from taking such a step. Fridges in class A consume 2.5 times as much energy as appliances in the current top energy efficiency class A+++. But a ban on marketing A-class appliances will come into force much too late: on July 1, 2012. There are no comparable restrictions on other energy guzzlers in private households. For example, tumble dryers: annual electricity consumption can be reduced by almost two thirds, from 350 kWh to around 120 kWh, by using super-efficient appliances. No European legislator has yet grasped this opportunity. Dryers in energy | E SS AY efficiency class D may still be sold in Europe. Without more radical minimum standards, we run the risk of hampering a tangible improvement in efficiency standards. One need only to look at the sales figures for home appliances with low energy efficiency ratings to see that supply can create demand. Provide leadership: Intelligent policy-making as the “game changer” In the battle against the waste of energy, regulatory policy has more subtle methods than outright bans. Using a more nuanced approach would keep public costs low while exploiting market forces. Since policy can only exercise a limited direct influence on con­ sumer behavior – and even then only using means that are dubious from a political, tax­payer and/or market perspective – it should aim to exercise indirect influence via energy suppliers. On this issue, the EU is on the right track. In its proposal for a directive on energy efficiency, the European Commission puts forward market-oriented measures to implement energy savings. Energy suppliers would be obliged to achieve annual savings quotas. Critics of this approach are too quick to label this as redolent of a planned economy, with its restriction on manufacturers’ sales volumes and energy-saving obligation on consumers. They are missing the point. The savings targets are consistently based on the previous year’s sales volume. Energy suppliers who are particularly successful on the market and in promoting efficiency can therefore continue to grow and expand. A system of white certificates would mean that savings made could be traded. White certificates provide a market incentive for energy suppliers to reward their customers for improved efficiency. The certificates would release great creativity, and could in the best case scenario create new branches of the energy service sector, as efficiency measures are currently certainly not part of energy producers’ core business. Thus energy consumption would probably be reduced much more quickly and effectively subject to the free play of market forces than it would be using intervention aimed directly at the consumer. The conditions under which white certificates would operate must of course be framed so that targets are achievable and like is compared with like. They must also address quantity structures that are attractive to the economy as a whole, while also permitting their effectiveness to be measured. In con­trast to other measures, the cost of procuring highly efficient home appliances is transparent and can basically be funded by householders themselves, whether they own or rent. What is more, the large, stable numbers involved ensure reliable framework conditions for a white certificate system. Supporting energy efficiency measures in private households through programs implemented by energy suppliers would enable annual savings of 12.3 billion kWh to be made from household electrical appliances alone. This corresponds to 10 percent of overall electricity consumption in the private sector. Countries where the level of efficiency is currently lower would be able to make much greater progress. “Energy efficiency is not only of moral value, it is also of economic value.” If we are to tackle the energy transition thoroughly, then the kilowatt hours saved must be made tradable. This sounds more radical than it is. Energy efficiency is not only of moral value, it is also of economic value. Dr. Kurt-Ludwig Gutberlet Chairman of the Board of Management 31 32 | Supervisory Board Report 33 Supervisory Board Report 35 Board of Management, Supervisory Board SUPERVISORY BOARD REPORT | Supervisory Board Report During the year under review, the Board of Management reported regularly to the Supervisory Board on the performance of the company and on its major decisions, both orally and in writing. Joe Kaeser, Chairman of the Supervisory Board The development of business and employment during the preceding financial year 2010, as well as the 2010 financial statement and management report, were explained to the Supervisory Board by the Board of Management at the two regular Supervisory Board meetings held during the year. During 2011, the Board of Management reported to the Supervisory Board on the development of business in the company’s various sales regions, particularly in Germany, Spain, Greece and Turkey, the rest of Western and Eastern Europe, in China, Russia, India, Central and Southeast Asia, and North America. The Board of Management also presented the key data for the 2012 Business Plan to the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board discussed these topics in detail. Other advisory efforts by the Supervisory Board focused on the development of competition in the European and non-European home appliance markets as well as the company’s response to changing market conditions. The Supervisory Board also deliberated on the development of the Product Areas, on projects aimed at further developing markets, on the planned construction of an Appliance Park in India, the expansion of our factory in Russia and site development in New Bern, USA and Berlin. The topics addressed by the Supervisory Board also included development in China, in particular in the country’s rural areas, and development with regard to the Chinese market for built-in appliances. The Supervisory Board also discussed the meaning of the internet for the home appliances business as well as new demands social media place on companies. The Supervisory Board sought details from the Board of Management about the company’s internal control system, including the internal auditing system, about risk management within the company, the assessment of risks and the creation of provisions. The Board of Management also reported to the Supervisory Board on the compliance organization, the compliance training conducted and compliance-related issues in 2011. The Supervisory Board also received reports from the Board of Management about the results of the tax audit for assessment periods 2003 through 2006 and the related and not inconsiderable costs for the year under review. In this context, the Board of Management reported on various internal audits which were conducted. In addition, the Supervisory Board decided to seek counsel’s opinion and set up a working group made up of experts from the shareholders. Furthermore, the Board of Management reported on the implementation of preventive measures in the future. The Supervisory Board discussed the matter in depth. In addition to its official sessions during the course of the year, regular discussions also took place between the Board of Management and the Chairman of the Supervisory Board and his deputies. 33 34 The financial statement of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and the consolidated financial statement as of December 31, 2011, as well as the management report for BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and the Group management report have been audited by Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Munich, and have been given their unqualified approval. The reports prepared by the auditors were presented to all members of the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board thoroughly examined the documents concerned and the Board of Management’s proposal regarding the allocation of net income. The reports were discussed in full at the Supervisory Board’s meeting to approve the balance sheet, which was held in the presence of the auditors. The Supervisory Board raises no objections and concurs with the findings of the audit. It approves the financial statements and management report of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH as well as the consolidated financial statements and Group management report; it recommends the shareholders to confirm the financial statements, to approve the consolidated financial statements and Group management report and to accept the Board of Management’s proposal regarding the allocation of net income. Mr. Thomas Bauer left the Supervisory Board on June 30, 2011. Mr. Mehmet Gürcan Karakaşş was elected to succeed him effective July 26, 2011. Mr. Dieter Schweisfurth left the Supervisory Board on July 31, 2011, and Mr. Axel Fischer succeeded him effective August 1, 2011. Mr. Klaus Helmrich was elected to succeed Prof. Hermann Requardt, who had left the Supervisory Board on October 31, 2011, effective November 1, 2011. The Supervisory Board would like to thank the Board of Management and the company’s employees for their successful endeavors over the past year. Munich, 11 May 2012 For the Supervisory Board Joe Kaeser Chairman BOARD OF MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY BOARD | Board of Management | Supervisory Board Dr. sc. pol. Kurt-Ludwig Gutberlet Chairman Corporate Strategy, Corporate Communications, Law and Industrial Policy, Compliance, Corporate Responsibility, Internal Audit, Information Security, Consumer Products, Customer Service Joe Kaeser, Munich Chairman of the Supervisory Board Member of the Managing Board of Siemens AG Mehmet Gürcan Karakaş, Stuttgart (since 26.07.2011) Director of Corporate Marketing and Sales of Robert Bosch GmbH Elmar Freund, Bad Neustadt Deputy Chairman of the Supervisory Board Chairman of the Group Works Committee Peter Kern, Frankfurt Union secretary to the executive committee of the IG Metall trade union Jean Dufour Corporate Sales, Brand Management, Logistics Johannes Närger Finance and M&A, Balancing, Accounting, Corporate Development and Controlling, Labor Relations Director, Human Resources, Data Protection, Information Technology, Purchasing, Tax, Customs, Insurances, Process and Performance Management Winfried Seitz Product Area Dishwashers, Product Area Cooking, Product Area Cooling, Product Area Laundry Care, Electronic Systems and Drives, Corporate Technology, Environmental, Occupational, Health, Fire and Disaster Protection Dr. rer. oec. pol. Rudolf Colm, Stuttgart Deputy Chairman of the Supervisory Board Member of the Board of Management of Robert Bosch GmbH Dr. rer. pol. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer, Stuttgart Deputy Managing Director of Robert Bosch GmbH Thomas Bauer, Stuttgart (until 30.06.2011) Director of Corporate Marketing and Sales of Robert Bosch GmbH Ellen Bonna-Knöpp, Giengen Chairwoman of the Works Committee of the Giengen plant Dr. rer. nat. Siegfried Dais, Stuttgart Deputy Chairman of the Board of Management of Robert Bosch GmbH Axel Fischer, Berlin (since 01.08.2011) Director Purchasing Product Area Laundry Care BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Klaus Helmrich, Munich (since 01.11.2011) Member of the Managing Board of Siemens AG Stefan Rauschhuber, Rosenheim Senior authorized representative of the IG Metall trade union, Rosenheim administrative office Prof. Dr. phil. nat. Dipl.-Phys. Hermann Requardt, Munich (until 31.10.2011) Member of the Managing Board of Siemens AG Wolfgang Rückert, Traunreut Deputy Chairman of the Works Committee, Traunreut plant Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dipl.-Ing. Siegfried Russwurm, Erlangen Member of the Managing Board of Siemens AG Dieter Schweisfurth, Hamburg (until 31.07.2011) Head of Sales, Bosch Northern Region, BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Karl-Heinz Seibert, Munich Corporate Vice President, Head of Mergers, Acquisitions and Post Closing Management of Siemens AG Siegfried Stegmann, Nuremberg Chairman of the Nuremberg Works Committee Franz Veh, Dillingen Chairman of the Works Committee, Dillingen plant 35 36 | Group Management Report In a difficult market environment, BSH managed to outperform the expected sales revenue in the financial year 2011. To this development contributed not only the on high levels slightly curbing demand in the dynamic markets in Eastern Europe and Asia, but also the increasing new orders in Germany. The cumulative demand for home appliances that combine energy efficiency and highest standards of comfort shows us that we are on the right track with our long-term strategy. 37 Development of Business 53 Net Assets, Financial Position and Results of Operations 59 Management of Opportunities and Risks 63Outlook DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Development of Business Overall economic development The world economy continued its economic recovery in 2011, but came under increasing pressure during the course of the year. The political upheavals in the Arab world, the disaster in Japan in March and the deepening debt crisis in the U.S. and especially in Europe clouded the business climate significantly and triggered a noticeable slowdown. Nevertheless, global gross domestic product continued to grow in 2011 at a solid rate of 3.2 percent. As in recent years, the emerging markets contributed disproportionately to global economic trends, although economic policy at the same time has slowed the growth rate for some time now. Following double-digit growth rates in previous years, the increase in value added in China was still 9.2 percent. The strongest growth impetus here came from domestic demand, while exports lost momentum noticeably. The Indian economy also lost some of its momentum. After an increase of 9.0 percent in 2010, gross domestic product rose here in 2011 by just 7.3 percent. Eastern European countries, on the other hand, were able to maintain their 2011 growth rate at 4.4 percent (2010: 4.4 percent). However, the EU debt crisis also affected economic development in most Eastern European countries. Economic output in the developed world appeared weaker, with few exceptions. Following modest growth in Western Europe in 2010, the debt crisis has slowed the expansion in recent times. The value added rose by only 1.5 percent, even less than a year ago (2.0 percent). Southern European countries were again mostly in recession. Development in Germany was again extremely positive, recording a plus of 3.0 percent (2010: 3.7 percent). This was due mainly to domestic investment and private consumption. However, the German economy slackened again at the end of 2011 for the first time since early 2009, also as a result of the EU debt crisis. In the U.S., the economy likewise lost its buoyancy noticeably. Persistently high unemployment, continued strong asset losses and the worsening of the debt crisis in the summer of 2011 dampened the domestic economy. Growth rates of just 1.7 percent (2010: 3.0 percent) were recorded. The weaker economic growth of the global economy and falling raw material prices from mid-2011 weighed on growth in Latin America. Even against the backdrop of a less expansionary economic policy, growth was lower at 4.4 percent than in 2010 (6.4 percent). The recovery from the global financial market crisis of 2008/2009 continued in 2011 but at a slower pace. The deepening EU debt crisis, however, proved increasingly to be an economic burden – especially for individual European countries, but also for Europe as a whole and for the world economy. The deepening EU debt crisis, however, proved increasingly to be an economic burden – especially for individual European countries, but also for Europe as a whole and for the world economy. 37 38 Development of the market for large home appliances The global market for large home appliances showed different regional trends in 2011. After the market was initially able to recover on a broad basis in 2010 from the immediate consequences of the financial and economic crisis, the increase in demand was significantly dampened in 2011. The negative market development in Western Europe was primarily impacted in 2011 by the European states in crisis. Sales were reduced by a significant extent in the large home appliances markets of Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece. The markets in Italy and Portugal slipped back into the red following a brief recovery in 2010. The Irish market also showed no recovery in 2011 after 2010. The markets in France and Sweden continued to show difficult sales trends, which were below the development of the previous year. Contrary to most other European markets the German market took a positive course in the year under review. Germany, the largest market for large home appliances in Western Europe, continued to perform well however. While private consumption represented an important pillar of the economy, the market grew in line with the positive consumer sentiment. The German market played a crucial role in this as a mainstay of demand in Western Europe. The market in Switzerland likewise performed well, with sales in the euro significantly stronger than in the local currency. The Eastern European market (including Turkey) for large home appliances was again able to produce good revenue growth after 2010. This was due mainly to Russia, the largest market in the region, which recorded double-digit growth. Strong growth was recorded in the local currency in the Turkish market, although the market in euro terms declined slightly. The market in Ukraine likewise continued its growth pattern, albeit at a lower level. Of the major countries in Eastern Europe, only the Polish market was unable to record a growth in sales. In the North American continent, the two markets of U.S. and Canada declined to a similar extent, with the decline slightly greater in Canada than in the U.S. Within Latin America, the three largest markets in Brazil, Mexico and Argentina recorded positive growth at a similar level in the local currency. In euro terms, some of the markets in the Latin American countries developed better, some worse than in the local currency. Overall, the market growth in Latin America in euro terms was lower than on the basis of local currencies. In three of the largest provinces in China, the support program for home appliances ended in 2011. In parallel with this, China, the largest growth driver to date for the global market for large home appliances, showed a marked slowdown in growth. The remaining regions in Asia largely continued to develop positively, albeit at a slightly slower pace. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT With non-uniform developments in the different countries, the markets of the Middle East and Africa recorded an overall market decline in euro terms. This was mainly due to the negative markets and currencies in the North African countries. Overall, the global market for large home appliances in 2011 was only down slightly, net of currency effects. Due to the increasing strength of the euro during the year, the market volume stagnated in euro terms at the previous year’s level. In essence, this development was due to weak markets in Western Europe and North America as well as a generally declining trend in market growth in the remaining regions. Revenue development In the 2011 year under review, the BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Group (referred to in the text as “the Group” or “BSH” and “BSH-D” in relation to the parent company) generated consolidated revenue of EUR 9.654 billion, a year on year increase of 6.4 percent. Net of currency effects, revenue amounted to EUR 9.812 billion, 8.2 percent more than in the previous year. Group revenue BSH (IFRS) in EUR billion 2011 2010 9.654 9.073 The market for home appliances in Germany registered growth of 3.8 percent in 2011. In Germany, the Group significantly outperformed the market and increased its turnover by 8.2 percent to EUR 2.062 billion, attributable especially to the strong performance in the area of consumer products and built-in appliances. This positive development was embodied additionally by the strong trend toward energy efficient products as well as successful innovations. As a result, the proportion of revenue generated inside Germany rose from 21.0 percent to 21.4 percent. In Western Europe – excluding Germany – revenue fell by EUR 26 million to EUR 3.514 billion. In Spain, Greece and Portugal in particular, a decline in revenue was recorded owing to the persistently challenging economic conditions. In Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Belgium and Northern Europe, on the other hand, BSH was able to achieve some significant gains. Revenue in Eastern Europe increased by 15.5 percent to EUR 1.846 billion. The markets in Russia, Turkey and Poland, in particular, bore the signs of very high growth in euro terms. The Turkish Lira and the Russian Ruble had a negative impact owing to conversion rate trends. On the North American market, BSH’s consolidated revenue in the year under review was considerably below that of the previous year. The sales declines are primarily due to the withdrawal from the 27-inch segment in laundry care and the development of the U.S. dollar. Revenue by region (as of December 31, 2011) Other 2.0% Germany 21.4% Asia 15.6% North America 5.0% Latin America 0.5% Western Europe 36.4% Eastern Europe 19.1% (including Turkey) The Group reported excellent business development in Asia. Revenue in China increased by almost 20 percent. Very positive revenue development was also reported in India, Malaysia and Singapore. In the Middle Eastern countries and in South Africa, the previous year’s figures were significantly exceeded. The Group reported a strong growth in revenue in Australia and Oceania, for currency-related reasons among others. The market for household appliances in Germany augmented by 3.8 percent in 2011. BSH’s turnover increased disproportionally high by 8.2 percent compared to the previous year. 39 40 Research and development In the year under review, the Group spent EUR 298 million on research and development, thus some 3.1 percent of revenue. On December 31, BSH had a workforce of 2,748 employees in this area (2010: 2,503 employees), and of these 1,537 in Germany (2010: 1,397 employees). Several new buildings were put into operation or planned for research and development in 2011. The building layout and the facilities have been designed to optimally support modern work practices in product development and promote creativity and cooperation. For example, development departments, laboratory facilities and meeting areas were designed according to the latest findings on the process organization. Expenditure for research and development amounted to 3.1 percent of revenue in the year under review. The development center for refrigeration appliances was opened in Nanjing (China). The special knowledge and proximity to the local market allow the needs of Chinese households to be identified more precisely and implemented in new products. Together with the existing competence center in Giengen (Germany), the center in Çerkezköy (Turkey), which is currently being extended, as well as the development center in Esquíroz (Spain), the development center will continue in the future to form the innovative Quadriga for the development of refrigeration equipment within BSH. BSH opened a new technology center in Berlin with worldwide responsibility for innovative product development of laundry care. In the “Green Building”, a center developed on the basis of the latest ecological findings, some 700 experts are working on new technologies and innovative applications for the next generation of laundry care appliances. They also use a network involving Berlin’s universities and scientific institutions. Expenditure for research and development in EUR million 298 277 20112010 The Group invested in a new development center for fully automatic coffee machines and espresso machines in Traunreut in order to strengthen the technology base for coffee even further. The company will create new jobs here in the areas of development and quality management. The construction of a further development building with additional laboratories is planned for the global competence center for the Product Area Dishwashers in Dillingen. Planning permission for this was granted in the fall. In a bid to secure its technology leadership, BSH extended its cooperation with domestic and foreign universities and research institutions in 2011. Of critical importance here were the objectives of an efficient network and a clear prioritization of application-related technologies. In the year under review, BSH again succeeded in successfully positioning newly developed products on the market. In particular, the attractive portfolio of super-efficient household appliances was extended to ensure greater success in this ever growing market segment. In 2011, numerous products from the portfolio were therefore again presented at the Inter­ national Consumer Electronics Fair (IFA) in Berlin. The technical innovations of BSH are also reflected in the consistently high number of new patent registrations – in the year under review, the Group is once again among the most active patent applicants in Germany. Based on this claim, the Group is continuously and consistently consolidating its global intellectual property portfolio in key technological and market-related areas. In 2011, BSH also successfully defended its top ranking in product tests. With 64 test winners (2010: 53) BSH still has a lead over its competitors. The Group and its brands were involved in 145 comparison tests (2010: 124). The test organizations rated 50 Group brand products as best-buy recommendations (2010: 45). In this category, too, BSH came out on top with a clear lead over its competitors. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Technically impressive innovation and excellent quality combined with particularly eye-catching design characterize the BSH products. This was again confirmed impressively in the year under review with BSH winning more than 140 design awards, among these such prestigious awards as the “iF product design award”, the “red dot design award”, the “interior innovation award” and the “Design Prize of the Federal Republic of Germany”. To sustain its technology and innovation leadership, the Group-wide introduction of the BSH Development System was launched in the year under review. The shorter development times and processes, assurance of the necessary protection of resources, the containment and reduction of complexity as well as increased flexibility are tasks that are to be addressed through specific measures within the framework of the BSH Development System. Best-practice methods are therefore used at all BSH development sites. In the product areas, implementation of the BSH Development System is also supported intensively by specialists and a needs-based training program. BSH’s products were distinguished with more than 140 design awards in 2011. Procurement The performance of the economy as a whole at the beginning of the year was more positive than later on in the year. In most procurement markets this led to higher demand and as a result considerable price increases. Over the course of the year, prices stabilized initially in the second quarter before falling again in the second half of the year. In the area of raw materials, the development of market prices, especially in flat steel and plastic granules, was pronounced. Apart from the demand, this was mainly driven by prices of primary products, such as iron ore and coking coal for steel production as well as propylene, styrene and additives for the production of plastics. The price trend for stainless steel was similar, but flatter. The downward trend in prices began earlier in the area of industrial metals and continued until shortly before the end of the year, with this trend being particularly pronounced in the case of nickel. With respect to manufacturing materials, the market prices developed unevenly. There were extreme price increases in rare earth elements. This was especially true for cerium, used for enamel and neodymium for electric motors. BSH achieved stable purchase prices again in the field of electronics while chemicals and primarily rigid foam were affected by an unfavorable price trend. Positive effects were realized through the use of international supplier markets. In addition, the securing of raw materials from non-ferrous metals was expanded. Contracts concluded at an early stage as well as longer-term contracts for steel continued to impact manufacturing costs favorably. An additional contribution affecting net income was provided through the increased use of Group-wide bundling of procurement. Despite the increase in demand in the first half of the year, there were no noticeable delivery bottlenecks in comparison with the previous year. This also applied to BSH procurement in the period following the natural disasters in Japan and Thailand. Despite the natural disasters in Japan and Thailand there were no noticeable delivery bottlenecks. 41 42 In order to standardize the payment terms from suppliers further, adjustments were again made to the payment conditions in the year under review. In relation to the purchase of indirect materials, the organization, standardization and bund­ ling continue to make good progress. The process of electronic order processing has been extended and implemented in various locations in Germany and abroad. An Order Center was set up in Poland for this purpose with responsibility for Europe. The cataloging of the indirect material enables efficient processing of transactions and provides scope for greater strategic alignment. The bundling activities in purchasing in relation to indirect materials were targeted mainly at production-related areas and information technology. Bundling activities were likewise initiated in the areas of marketing and services. Under measures to mitigate supplier-related risks, proven methods of financial supplier analysis were again used for early detection and risk management. As in the previous year, BSH strategically used derivatives in order to counter the market and price risk in the procurement of individual, selected raw materials. Production BSH produces its large home appliances and small consumer products in 42 factories at 28 locations in 13 countries around the world. BSH produces its large home appliances and small consumer products in 42 factories at 28 locations in 13 countries around the world. 2011 was marked in the Product Area Laundry Care by the establishment of the factory in St. Petersburg (Russia) in order to take account from mid-2012 of the ever increasing demand for washing machines on the Russian market. Furthermore, technical and organizational upgrading of the factory in Çerkezköy (Turkey) to new, uniform product platforms was carried out. To meet the increased demand for washing machines and washer dryers in China, additional investments were also made to expand production capacities in Nanjing (China). In New Bern (USA), BSH withdrew from the regional production of washing machines. Due to the extremely aggressive competition, which led to a sharp fall in prices, the unprofitable main segment of the U.S. market with 27-inch equipment was abandoned. By transferring employees to the manufacturing of dishwashers, the impact on the workforce was reduced. Following the success of 2010, the BSH home appliances plant in Nauen was again awarded “Factory of the Year” by the trade journal “Produktion” and the consulting firm A.T. Kearney and also received the “Global Excellence in Operations” award. The subsidiary impressed here in particular thanks to the high value added and efficient use of resources in all areas. The Product Area Refrigeration began in 2011 to supply the Russian market with NoFrost refrigeration equipment from the refrigeration plant in St. Petersburg. An innovative product platform for refrigeration appliances started up in Çerkezköy (Turkey), following heavy investment in efficient plants there the previous year. The factories in Giengen (Germany) and Esquíroz (Spain) were also equipped with new production technology in order to prepare for new series of appliances and to ensure sustained high performance. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT The foundations for further growth in China were laid with the start of construction of an additional factory and logistics building in Chuzhou. The Product Area Cooking concentrated in the year under review on the consistent continuation of the program commenced in 2010 to optimize production. With the objective of increasing competitiveness, measures were implemented in particular to standardize and develop innovative manufacturing technologies in addition to structural adjustments in the factories. To meet the increasing future capacity requirements, manufacturing and development capabilities were expanded in China. The construction of a new factory is planned in India. In the Product Area Dishwashers, the main emphasis at all locations in the year under review was the optimization of production facilities. At the same time, new series of appliances were successfully launched both in Çerkezköy (Turkey) and in Dillingen (Germany). The small home appliances division, Consumer Products, set itself ambitious growth targets for the future with the Vision 2015 program. The existing product portfolio was supplemented in 2011 by innovations such as the new series of the Tassimo hot beverage system and expanded to include the award-winning bagless vacuum cleaner and the new Filtrino hot-water dispenser. The sales volume of self-manufactured consumer products has been growing steadily for years. The increasing demand for our own manufacturing capacity is also fulfilled by the division through productivity gains and especially through consistent implementation of the BSH Production System. Investment will be made here in the development of products as well as in production technology. With the forward-looking decision to set up a new factory at the Çerkezköy site (Turkey), the Consumer Products division is equipping itself for further growth. A new production record was set in Bad Neustadt. In the traditional plant in the Rhön, which has been in existence for more than 70 years, in excess of two million floor care appliances were produced for the first time in the year under review. In addition, BSH invested more than EUR 5 million in 2011 in the location to ensure customer needs could continue to be fulfilled optimally through innovations in technology and logistics. Despite international cost pressure, the location is also equipped for the future thanks to its excellent flexibility and the commitment of the employees. The trend products related to the consumption of coffee and hot beverages are especially successful in BSH’s product portfolio. To continue to meet the ever-increasing demand in the future, the company started up a new production line for fully automatic coffee machines in Nazarje (Slovenia) and continued to expand development at the location. The Electronic Systems and Drives division optimized and expanded capacities for motor production at the Michalovce location. The performance of the logistical systems was increased in tandem with this. This allowed further increases in productivity to be achieved. Construction of a new production hall in Nanjing was launched for expanding motor production in China. Operation will commence here from 2012 in order to meet the increased demand of the Product Area Laundry Care in China. With more than two million floor care appliances, the traditional plant in Bad Neustadt set a new production record in 2011. 43 44 The practical application of the BSH Production System at all production locations remains the focus. The implementation allows for continuous improvement in productivity and thus a positive contribution to operating profit. The linking of the core supply chain, procurement and production processes as an important value proposition along the value chain should also be viewed in this context. Thanks to BSH’s high sales revenues the degree of capacity utilization was high – particularly in Germany, Turkey and China. To take account of the increase in revenue in the year under review and the planned future growth, the Group increased its capacities accordingly worldwide. The companies in growth regions such as China and Russia, but also in Germany, Slovakia and Spain, will profit from this in particular. In addition to the sharp increase in production performance, the high turnover of the Group also resulted in significantly increased output as well as a capacitive utilization at a high level – in particular in Germany, Turkey and China. In the year under review, the Group was also able to benefit from the continued high quality of its products and lower warranty costs. Key factors for this success include stable processes, the further progressive implementation of the BSH Production System and the use of improved methods for early detection of errors. As a result, numerous new launches could be brought to market again without negatively impacting the failure rate. In cooperation with customer service, processes for feedback from the market were refined and customer-driven solutions were introduced in customer support. Supply chain management Supply Chain Management focused in 2011 on sustainable use and safeguarding the stability of the processes, while also focusing at all times on their enhanced development. An integral tool of BSH for structured planning and implementation of training programs in the supply chain network was created with the SCM Compass for Qualification. The aim is to ensure Group-wide transparency of uniform knowledge standards in relation to the supply chain processes. The required knowledge transfer is assured through a comprehensive training concept and the resulting measures derived from this. Supply Chain Management in 2012 will focus on increasing process security and stability. Capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (excluding goodwill) Capital expenditure Capital expenditure by the Group in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (excluding goodwill) climbed by EUR 50 million over the previous year to EUR 453 million in the year under review, which equates to 4.7 percent of consolidated revenue. in EUR million 2011 2010 453 403 Of the capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, EUR 148 million or approx. 33 percent is attributable to Germany and EUR 305 million to other countries. BSH invested in production facilities in Germany for new energy-efficient refrigeration appliances, in the introduction of new products and product platforms for cookers, dishwashers and laundry care as well as for vacuum cleaners. There was significant expenditure on new development buildings in Dillingen, Giengen and Traunreut and for the new technology center in Berlin. In addition, expansion of information technology was driven forward. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Capital expenditure outside Germany focused primarily on factories in Turkey, China, Spain, Russia and Poland. In addition to capacity expansions, investment was made at these locations in infrastructure and the development and expansion of the manufacturing of new products, particularly for the Product Areas Laundry Care and Refrigeration. Of the capital expenditure, 32 percent can be attributed to new products and 20 percent to expansion and rationalization. Expenditure for infrastructure projects – including land, buildings, logistics, information technology and environmental protection – amounted to 35 percent while 13 percent was spent on value retention. Finance The continuing debt crisis in Europe and the United States caused great turmoil in the financial markets during the year under review. The uncertainty of market participants led to a very high volatility. The well-proven risk-adjusted investment strategy of the Group was also applied in the year under review. Given the difficult market environment, BSH still achieved a satisfactory investment performance, managing to limit the slight fall in the value of the portfolio to a negative, but low single-digit percentage range. The financial assets and other fund assets cover pension liabilities at the cutoff date by nearly 100 percent. During the year under review, current and non-current financial liabilities increased by a total of EUR 518 million. This is due largely to an increase in bank loans in China amounting to EUR 279 million to finance local growth strategy while diversifying the financing mix, consisting of alternating financing, bank loans and an offshore renminbi bond launched by BSH-D in Hong Kong. The bond for a total of CNY 2 billion (EUR 229 million) was issued in three tranches of three, five and seven-year terms. The bond proceeds were made available as funding to the Chinese subsidiaries of BSH on the basis of appropriate agreements with identical maturities. With the granting of an additional low-interest loan amounting to EUR 300 million, of which the first tranche of EUR 150 million was paid out in late 2011, the European Investment Bank (EIB) is supporting BSH projects in Germany to develop energy-efficient home appliances. Utilization of the second tranche of the same magnitude is planned for spring 2012. The Group like­wise expects financing expenses significantly below market interest rates for the second part of these financial liabilities. The profitability of the borrowings gives the Group additional scope for the future for investment in the development of resource-saving products. In order to hedge financial risks, BSH uses a broad range of appropriate treasury methods. A global treasury control unit in the Group ensures that all treasury risks are monitored, identified and measured. Necessary control measures are initiated in a timely manner as a result. Especially in the major markets of Poland and Turkey, the Group was exposed to translational currency risks in the year under review. About 60 percent of operational hedges in the year under review were attributable to the currency risks of the Russian Ruble, the British Pound and the Turkish Lira. As part of the growth strategy in China, BSH issued an offshore Renminbi bond in Hong Kong in the order of CNY 2 billion. 45 46 The currency risks from operative business are identified and measured in a rolling process with a planning timeframe of one year as part of a defined hedging strategy. Identified ex­ posures are hedged, where necessary, with the help of derivatives. The centrally defined hedging policy of the past was also pursued in the period under review. BSH hedges the cash flows in British Pounds, Swiss Francs and Polish Zloty on the basis of Cash Flow Hedge Accounting at Group level. The Group limits the credit and liquidity risk by means of effective central cash management, access to lines of credit provided by prime-rated banks and a Syndicated Loan Facility primarily entered into for contingencies. A key objective is to ensure financial flexibility and avoid or reduce inappropriate refinancing risks. To limit the interest rate risk and to create opportunities, the Group has for many years been using the medium and long-term financing options in the market at favorable rates. In August 2011, the rating agency Standard and Poor’s affirmed the long-term rating of “A” and the short-term rating of “A-1” for BSH. The outlook was rated as “stable”, based on the high and stable operating results and cash flows and due to the moderate debt ratio. This underlines the outstanding credit rating of BSH. Human resources and social issues As at December 31, 2011, BSH employed a total of 45,620 people worldwide, including apprentices (2010: 42.841). Of this total, 30,811 (2010: 28,647) were employed internationally and 14,809 (2010: 14,194) in Germany. Number of employees 2011 2010 45,620 42,841 Workforce by region (as of December 31, 2011) Germany 32% Asia 24% North America 3% Latin America 1% Western Europe 18% Eastern Europe 22% exluding Germany including Turkey Especially in China, Turkey, Germany and Russia, the Group increased its workforce in the year under review. Additional staff were employed – to a lesser extent – in Poland, India and Slovenia. A slight downsizing took place in the USA, Greece and Slovakia. In the development divisions of BSH-D, more than 850 employees work in highly skilled technical roles; in 2011 alone more than 110 additional employees were hired. The opening of the new Technology Center for Laundry Care in Berlin completed the futureoriented change from manufacturing to developing appliances. The forward-looking change from manufacturing to development location in Berlin was successfully completed with the opening of the new Technology Center for Laundry Care in 2011. BSH employs 246 engineers in this technology center, including the 44 employees newly recruited in the year under review. 806 people were in apprenticeship contracts as at December 31, 2011. Of these, 447 apprentices and “DH” (dual university) students as well as 30 trainees were employed in Germany. Of the 447 apprentices, 361 were training for industrial and technical careers, while 86 were undertaking commercial training. The participants of the international trainee program come from six different subsidiaries. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT BSH is countering the demographic changes in industrialized countries through the strategic expansion of international talent management and the strengthening of diversity activities. The Group is thus taking on the increasingly tougher global battle for brainpower. Owing to this strategic importance, Diversity Management was amalgamated into a separate department within the Corporate Human Resources division in 2011. Dimensions such as internationality (ethnic origin), gender (gender diversity) and age (demographics) are the focal points in this regard. For several years, BSH has been responding to demographic changes with an enterprise-wide initiative. This includes measures such as ergonomic workplace design, optimization of assembly lines and activities in the area of occupational health management. BSH is pursuing a series of sustainable activities both for ensuring succession and for staff development. For example, the Group further intensified employer branding in the year under review and again successfully competed for the “Top Employer in Germany” award (6th place) as well as the “Top Employer for Engineers” award (4th place) run by the CRF institute. At the same time, activities for using social media channels, for example for recruiting, were initiated. In 2011, BSH has again been ranked by the CRF Institute as “Top Employer Germany” and “Top Employer for Engineers”. Through the medium of the “Wege zur BSH” (Ways to BSH) brochure, the Human Resources division provides information on attractive job opportunities for schoolgoers, students and graduates and also shows how BSH as an employer and training company fulfills its social responsibility and simultaneously stimulates enthusiasm among young people for the company by using targeted measures. Activities at universities collaborating with BSH throughout Germany were further intensified as part of the university marketing drive. Attendance at various college fairs continued to expand. In addition, the student retention program “students@BSH” was launched. As well as attending school information days, BSH organized the annual “Girls’ Day” in order to set up and intensify contact with younger students. In the framework of the project “FOCUS macht Schule” (FOCUS at school), the Group is cooperating with the news magazine FOCUS and providing educational materials on various topics, such as sustainability and product design. Also in 2011, the focus was on developing the international talent management processes. In this context, the annual performance appraisal interview with statements about competence, potential and training needs of staff was readied for further international roll-out. Numerous events were again organized in 2011 for the members of the talent pools and programs. A new training program is being offered for the approximately 600 members of the “Junior Executive Pool” (JEP) called “JEP Crossing”. In a pilot event with about 50 members, an active exchange took place between the members as well as with representatives of the department units. The aim of this event is the international networking of information and discussion on strategic issues at BSH. The promotion of international talent as well as cross-country and cross-divisional networking was again the objective of the annual meeting of the “International Executive Pool” (IEP), which has roughly 100 members. The “Senior Executive Program” (SEP) for participants from senior management ranks at BSH was continued with great success. 2008, the first year of this program, was concluded with a closing ceremony in early 2011. In the three years of membership of SEP, nearly 90 percent of these participants have taken on a different role in the Group. The first class of the “Senior Executive Program” graduated in 2011. During the triannual leadership program almost 90 percent of the participants assumed a new position in the enterprise. 47 48 The “Project Management” career path was implemented for product projects at all locations in Germany and in the meantime in the subsidiaries in China, France, Spain, Turkey and the United States. Moreover, projects with IT involvement were also included in Germany. The steadily increasing number of employee deployments worldwide supports the global growth of BSH. At the cut-off date, 325 employees were working abroad for BSH. Compared to 2010, assignments between foreign subsidiaries in particular increased by nearly 50 percent. The BSH Academy Corporate offers training programs for professionals, managers and junior staff of BSH. BSH employees are being used increasingly as internal coaches for the training programs. They are prepared for their task by specially developed train-the-trainer programs. It is therefore possible to provide training on specific fields of knowledge of BSH. The BSH Academy offer is available to all BSH employees worldwide. Aimed at the business and growth strategy, the “Corporate Learning Landscape” is managed internationally by six major BSH Academies (Germany, China, Poland, Spain, Turkey, USA). These ensure the integration of countries with a smaller BSH presence (“lead country concept”) by means of a regional structure. BSH offers a special training program for all managers worldwide. The positive development of leadership ability at BSH, which is also visible in the results of employee surveys, is not least due to the continuous training of managers. For the past eleven years, BSH has been operating its own training center at Kloster Zangberg. The BSH Academy Corporate organizes about 80 percent of training in Germany here. The employee survey as a tool for organizational development is now well established internationally and was carried out in 23 countries in 2011. The participation rate of 84 percent on average across countries shows a high acceptance among both managers and employees. In Germany, the good results from the previous survey were maintained at a high level and even strengthened in part. Newly included issues such as compliance and sustainability were rated as excellent across the Group. Managers and employees elaborated appropriate measures in the wake of the widespread communication of the survey results, for which a monitoring tool is now also available internationally for documentation and tracking purposes. This also allows best-practice sharing across location and country boundaries. The feedback instruments are widely accepted in BSH and contribute to the improvement of leadership and cooperation. As a result of the 2009 employee survey, 42 percent of managers in Germany have to date carried out the “Feedback for Executives”. Internationally it was deployed in Poland, Russia, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain. The morale barometer anchored in the BSH Production System is used as a feedback instrument in the factories. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Information technology Implementation of the strategic platform for business processes, weBSH.net, continued during the year under review with system deployments in the BSH companies in Great Britain, Italy, Switzerland and Slovenia. Coverage of European BSH companies on the basis of weBSH.net is thus largely completed. Moreover, the conditions for the adoption of weBSH.net in the overseas BSH regions were also fulfilled. Platforms for software development were standardized in this context and the SAP systems updated to the latest release level. The project work for implementing weBSH.net in the subsidiaries in China, Australia and New Zealand commenced on this basis. The progressive development is leading to ever more powerful, integrated and process-wide information systems, which will provide global, location-independent access via different terminals. This gives rise to ever increasing demands on safety and security of information. To meet these challenges, BSH initiated a project for managing risks relating to information security. Cost, delay and technology risks in major IT projects are recorded and monitored by project management and – if necessary – by a Project Risk Manager, a Project Management Office or a Program/Project Office. Corporate responsibility Sustainability is an integral part of the corporate strategy and business model of BSH. The principles of our mission statement represent the starting point for this strategy. The Corporate Responsibility (CR) division has been responsible since the beginning of 2011 for the topic of sustainability at Group level which is a focal point of the Group. The CR Committee is the appropriate group-wide decision-making body for the sustained positioning and orientation of BSH. The management and implementation of the critical mea­ sures defined at Group level are likewise the responsibility of the committee. The necessary sustainability objectives for the Group are defined in the business plan with concrete actions. BSH has defined customers and products, companies and employees as well as society and environment as areas of activity that were derived from the mission statement within the scope of corporate responsibility. Specific approaches in the fields of action include the super-efficient products portfolio, resource efficiency in production, strict adherence to social and ethical standards in all stages of the value chain as well as diversity management and forward-looking retention of young talent. In the year under review, BSH published its “Environmental and Corporate Responsibility 2010” report, the nineteenth report of its kind. This sustainability report focused on the new Corporate Responsibility division and the topics of energy efficiency in consumer products and forward-looking work systems for employment of older workers. In addition, new and environmentally-friendly logistics concepts were presented for the transport of finished products. Sustainability is an integral part of the corporate strategy and business model of BSH. The department of Corporate Responsibility was created in January 2011. It is responsible for the issue of sustainability on the corporate level. 49 50 Environmental protection Energy and resource efficiency in production and in relation to products was the focus of BSH in the area of environmental protection in the year under review. With the initiation of the Group project “Resource Efficiency 2015”, BSH set itself very ambitious goals last year. Among other things, the production-related, specific consumption of energy and water – relative to the base year 2010 – will be reduced by 25 percent up the end of 2015. Under the supervision of external scientific and technical consultants, significant savings were identified in the framework of pilot projects in such diverse fields as lighting, compressed air, plastics, air conditioning, ventilation systems and optimization of production systems. The objectives set as part of the Group project are to be fulfilled in individual projects in the coming years through implementation of defined measures. BSH was honored in 2011 by the German Government and the German Chambers of Industry and Commerce (DIHK) as a “Climate Protection Company”. Due to the outstanding achievements in the area of climate protection, BSH was honored in 2011 by the German Government and the German Chambers of Industry and Commerce (DIHK) as a “Climate Protection Company”. This was accompanied by the inclusion of the company in the “Climate Protection and Energy Efficiency Group of German Industry”. Regarding the energy efficiency of the Group’s products, numerous innovations in the year under review led to significant improvements in energy consumption. Even before the mandatory application of the labeling of white goods with the new energy label as prescribed by the European Union with effect from the end of 2011, BSH already had washing machines, cooling appliances and dishwashers of the highest energy efficiency class A+++ in its portfolio. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) awarded BSH U.S. the “ENERGY STAR Sustained Excellence Award” for the Bosch brand. This highest award was in recognition of the contribution to increasing environmentally friendly usability and reduction in greenhouse gases by reducing energy and water consumption of dishwashers and washing machines. This year, BSH was for the first time awarded the prestigious Hermes Award by the European Institute for Creative Strategies and Innovation in Paris in the category of “improving the human relationship with nature”. The jury commended the Super Efficiency Portfolio of BSH in this context. This portfolio combines the most economical and environmentally friendly equipment for all product categories of BSH and thereby positions the Group as a leader in this market. The products occupy leading global positions in energy efficiency and resource conservation. Super-efficient fridge-freezer combinations consume up to 73 percent, dishwashers up to 50 percent and washing machines up to 38 percent less power than comparable units 15 years ago. The most energy-efficient tumble dryer with heat pump technology is 60 percent below the limit of the energy-efficiency class A and consumes nearly 70 percent less power than comparable appliances 15 years ago. Also in 2011, the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche again awarded a certificate to selected indicators of BSH’s Super Efficiency Portfolio following an audit review. The criteria used were the new regulations of the EU energy label. The sales share of superefficient appliances in BSH’s product portfolio amounted to 28 percent in the year under review. This corresponds to sales of 3.5 million appliances and, calculated over the useful life, leads to electricity savings of 1.9 billion kilowatt hours. This is equivalent to the average annual electri­ city consumption of more than 525,000 private households in Germany. DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Regulations governing energy management were integrated in the group-wide environmental management system in the year under review. Investments in energy-efficient production processes and projects in the context of energy efficiency programs resulted in a decline in demand for energy and water despite increased numbers of appliances. The environmental protection figures for energy and water consumption thus improved considerably beyond the targets. No further reductions could be achieved however (see chart) in relation to waste volumes from the factories, which is mainly due, in terms of quantity, to steel scrap and packaging material. The recycling rate of these materials is in excess of 90 percent however. In the year under review, a total of 37 of the Group’s 42 production facilities were certified under ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systems. BSH spent EUR 20 million on environmental protection at the locations in the year under review, which included ongoing expenses in addition to capital expenditure. Additional information about environmental protection within the Group and at our international production facilities is available on the Internet. Environmental figures for production 593 650 81.6 80.3 1.23 1.10 38.7 31.8 2011 2010 20112010 2011 2010 20112010 Energy per ton Product (kWh/t Product) Waste per ton Product (kg/t Product) Water per ton Product (m3/t Product) CO2-emissions per ton Product* (kg/t Product) * Excluding proportion from electrical energy generation, district heating and transport Significant developments In order to meet the exceptionally high demand for refrigeration appliances in China, property rights were acquired in December 2010 in Chouzhou to expand the existing production capacities. Construction of the second refrigeration plant commenced in March 2011. To finance the innovations and capital expenditure as well as the growth in the Chinese market in the long term, BSH issued a bond of the order of CNY 2 billion (EUR 229 million) in September on the offshore renminbi market in Hong Kong, which is significantly less expensive for funding than short-term bank loans in China. The tranches of the bond feature coupons of varying rates and maturities. In the year under review, a total of 37 of the Group’s 42 production facilities were certified under ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systems. 51 52 As part of its expansion strategy in Asia, BSH founded a company based in Mumbai mid-2011, which will commence production of laundry care and cookers at a later date. In the first quarter of 2012 this new company will take over the sales and service activities from the sales company that has already been active in India for a number of years. In addition to the project business previously operated by a distributor in South Korea, BSH founded a subsidiary in Seoul mid-2011 with the goal of promoting the sales activities for consumer products in the South Korean market. To operate the sales activities in South East Europe more intensively and independently, the existing sales offices in Bulgaria, Croatia and Serbia were converted in November 2011 to subsidiaries under national law. Since 2010, BSH has been shifting its freight transportation from road to rail. This commitment was officially recognized in December 2011 by the German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) as a climate protection project. Based on this confirmation, BSH will be awarded CO2 certificates in the future. Due to a specific event in the second half of 2011, BSH made the lasting experience that special care and caution are needed in dealing with stakeholders on the topic of social media. In November of the financial year, the foreign-run finished goods warehouse of the Russian distribution company in the vicinity of Moscow burned down completely. The resulting initial delivery problems and replacements constituted significant challenges. The Group managed to compensate for the backlog of orders within a short time though with great effort. The corporate strategy of BSH to work in all areas of the value chain in an optimally environmentally-friendly and resource-efficient manner, was expanded to include logistics. In the framework of the “BSH Transportation Shift Project” commenced in 2010, BSH has been shifting its freight transportation from road to rail in order to make the goods transport more environmentally friendly and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. This commitment was officially recognized in December 2011 by the German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) as a climate protection project. Based on this confirmation, BSH will be awarded CO2 certificates in the future. The project will be considered under the Kyoto Protocol as a flagship project. N E T A SS E T S , F I N A N C I A L P OS I T I O N A N D R E S U LT S O F O P E R AT I O N S | G R O U P M A N AG E M E N T R E P O R T Net Assets, Financial Position and Results of Operations Results and key influencing factors In the difficult year under review 2011, the Group exceeded its sales expectations and achieved consolidated revenue of EUR 9.654 billion, representing an increase of 6.4 percent over the previous year. The unfavorable exchange rate movements – primarily because of the Turkish Lira – negatively impacted the consolidated revenue to the order of 1.6 percent. Compared to 2010, the cost of sales increased by 8.3 percent. The structural increase by about one percentage point was due mainly to higher prices in the commodity markets and exchange rate influences. Due to counteracting factors, such as improved production processes, the Group achieved a positive gross margin of 37.1 percent of revenue, despite the unfavorable procurement oppor­ tunities compared with the previous year. During the year under review, a total of EUR 2,582 million was spent on sales and administration, corresponding to a share of 26.7 percentage points of revenue. The growth offensive in Asian and Eastern European countries, challenging competition in highly competitive markets such as Eastern Europe and China and the efforts of BSH to expand its market share went hand in hand with measures to increase market penetration in resourceefficient household appliances. These activities led to an increase in selling expenses. Administration costs amounted to EUR 562 million and accounted for 5.8 percent of revenue, compared to 5.6 percent in the year before. The increase is due primarily to higher personnel costs due to the expansion of the workforce last year in various corporate functions and the development of personnel costs, including allocations to provisions during the year under review. Furthermore, the change also resulted to a minor extent from the increased economic transparency through the introduction of the weBSH.net system in additional subsidiaries. These standardized system processes lead to the harmonization and improvement of the cause-specific allocation of functional expenses. As in previous years, BSH again increased its spending on research and development, which rose by 7.6 percent during the year under review. Measured in terms of revenue, the share amounted to 3.1 percent as in the previous year. Other operating income increased significantly by EUR 50 million with an improvement in the sales ratio to 3.7 percentage points. In contrast, other operating expenses decreased slightly to EUR 357 million. The net comparison with the previous year shows surplus revenue of EUR 9 million from the allocation and reversal of non-function-related provisions. Expenses exceeded revenues by EUR 68 million during the year under review in the comparison of the allocations and reversals of these provisions. Other operating income was recorded in respect of infringement of industrial property rights. Provisions are recognized for pending legal disputes on the scale deemed necessary at the time of recognition to cover expected consumption. Although the Group essentially considers the claims made to be unjustified, liabilities over and above this also cannot be ruled out completely. Augmenting commodity prices and negative effects from currency translation resulted in an increase of production costs by 8.3 percent in the finanical year 2011. 53 54 As part of the Field Action for dishwashers in the U.S. and for sales of hot beverage systems, existing provisions were revised in accordance with the expected claim. Existing provisions for sales risks were reduced due to lack of utilization and updated estimates. The external tax audit for the tax years 2003 to 2006 was completed in the year under review and led to a significant expenditure for the year under review. Further burdens resulted from sales activities and rendering of services both in Germany and abroad, and allocations as well as utilizations of provisions were made. Additional areas for action were examined and ana­ lyzed in relation to other sales-related activities with the involvement of external consultants. However, as the present state of knowledge does not allow a reliable estimate to be made, provisions were not allocated. An appropriate adjustment was made on the cut-off date following a review of the provision for wage tax. Furthermore, derecognitions affecting the net result resulted in the year under review due to lack of utilization as well as other minor allocations or reversals of various provisions. As in previous years, BSH accordingly recognized necessary financial precautions at the cut-off date at all Group companies for known risks and other exposures. Appropriate individual value adjustments were made for trade accounts receivable as well as with respect to suppliers. As a result of necessary value adjustments in accordance with IAS 36, the income statement was significantly burdened due to the regular review of assets. The valuation of financial assets under IAS 39 resulted in a significant impairment loss in the financial year. The regulations on necessary write-downs to fair value were complied with. The balance of gains and losses from foreign currency derivatives amounts to a net gain of EUR 7 million. This includes the internal hedging transactions in subsidiaries with the parent company. The latter in turn combines the hedging transactions of the Group on the external market. This gives rise in the financial year to a positive change in comparison with the previous year’s result. The measurement and realization of trade receivables and payables in foreign currency resulted in a profit of EUR 11 million. The measurement and realization of trade receivables and trade payables denominated in foreign currency resulted again in the period under review in a profit of EUR 11 million following a positive result the year previously. The profits of EUR 109 million exceeded the losses, which amounted to EUR 98 million. This clearly demonstrates the success of the hedging strategy at BSH. Overall, the comparison of profit and loss from foreign exchange derivatives or realizations and measurement of foreign currency trade receivables and payables gave rise to a considerable gain of EUR 18 million during the period under review. N E T A SS E T S , F I N A N C I A L P OS I T I O N A N D R E S U LT S O F O P E R AT I O N S | G R O U P M A N AG E M E N T R E P O R T The remaining operating results are only slightly affected by a major incident in Russia and its insurance repercussions. Other operating income is likewise also affected by insurance payments and reimbursements for losses in the U.S. and by foreign currency conversion differences in relation to the Turkish Lira and the Russian Ruble. A year-on-year comparison shows a considerable additional expense of EUR 46 million on the net of finance income and finance cost. The finance cost clearly exceeds the finance income in this case by EUR 109 million. The movement in the expense is attributable to the issue of offshore renminbi bonds in Hong Kong to finance the net working capital in China as well as international sales activities and the funds raised from Chinese and European banks for planned innovations, capital expenditure and growth. In the year under review, BSH for the first time reported the interest components of obligations for pensions, retirement and anniversaries, which were previously shown under personnel costs, in the net interest result rather than in the operating results. The net finance result includes a reclassification of EUR 47 million for the interest expense and income of external plan assets, compared with EUR 51 million the previous year. Prior year comparatives are illustrated and explained in detail in the Annex. Other net finance cost amounts to EUR 46 million and is therefore significantly above that of the previous year. The change is mostly due to the losses on financial assets. In the year under review, BSH for the first time reported the interest components of obligations for pensions, retirement and anniversaries, which were previously shown under personnel costs, in the net interest result rather than in the opera­ting result. Earnings before income tax amounted to date to a very positive EUR 538 million for BSH. Compared to last year, this is especially true considering the material cost increases in the financial year and significantly increased market, competition and sales activities within the framework of future-oriented growth strategy. The tax on profits in the Group amounts to EUR 164 million (2010: EUR 224 million) and includes the allocation to provisions for tax of EUR 23 million. This corresponds to 1.7 percent in terms of revenue compared to 2.5 percent the previous year. Following the netting of deferred tax of EUR 164 million, the total income tax charge comprises only current tax. The percentage of German tax as a proportion of current tax amounted to 29.3 percent in the year under review. Current tax on profits from abroad declined year on year by EUR 27 million to EUR 116 million. The Group tax rate was 30.5 percent compared with 32.5 percent the previous year. Net profit amounted to EUR 374 million or 3.9 percent of revenue. Following deduction of minority interests, Group profit amounted to EUR 373 million compared with EUR 465 million the previous year. Group profit (IFRS) in EUR million 2011 2010 373 465 55 56 Statement of cash flow Compared to 2010, cash and cash equivalents decreased by 11.1 percent. Reasons for this include cash outflows from operating activities and investing activities that exceed the cash flow from financing activities. These deviations are due mainly to changes in results before income tax and to fewer negative effects in the development of inventories. In addition, a strong increase in trade accounts receivable and a slight year-on-year change in short-term liabilities and provisions must also be taken into account. Lower cash outflows from investments in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and securities are offset by higher proceeds from the sale of finance receivables and the sale of securities. In relation to cash flows from financing activities, cash flow-promoting effects result from the juxtaposition of the borrowing and repayment of financial liabilities and cash outflows from the distribution to shareholders. While exchange rate fluctuations in relation to cash and cash equivalents were slightly positive, no consolidated group-related factors were considered. Overall, the cash and cash equivalents changed therefore during the year under review to EUR 511 million. Assets Total assets increased by EUR 534 million year-on-year to EUR 7,435 million. In relation to non-current assets, the increase in fixed assets was broadly balanced by the reduction in non-current financial assets. The changes in current assets were mainly due to the increase in trade receivables. Stocks and bonds were also involved to a minor extent. By contrast, cash and cash equivalents and other current assets declined. In relation to noncurrent assets, the increase in fixed assets was broadly balanced by the reduction in noncurrent financial assets. Market and competition-oriented activities and related revenue increases – mainly in Asia and in Eastern Europe and Turkey – justified the considerable increase in trade accounts receivable to EUR 2,259 million, corresponding to 30.4 percentage points of total assets. Assets: Structure in % 2011 2010 7 30 8 25 Cash and cash equivalents, securities Trade accounts receivable 18 Inventories 39 Fixed assets and non-current financial assets 10 Other assets 18 36 9 7,435 6,901 Balance sheet total (in EUR million) Due to changed conditions, there has been no complete transfer of economic risk on discounting bills of exchange receivable in China since 2011, with the result that there was no write-off of the bills in the balance sheet. The Group therefore presented the bills of exchange receivable (EUR 92 million) during the year under review both as trade receivables and current financial liabilities. Bills of exchange receivable of up to EUR 338 million were presented for discount last year. N E T A SS E T S , F I N A N C I A L P OS I T I O N A N D R E S U LT S O F O P E R AT I O N S | G R O U P M A N AG E M E N T R E P O R T Other current assets decreased to EUR 379 million primarily due to a decrease in other receiv­ ables from third parties. Due to the expansion of sales in the year under review and the planned further increase in 2012 as well as the maintenance of high standards by BSH in relation to delivery performance, there was an increase in inventories by EUR 79 million to EUR 1,305 million. Measured against the share of total assets, inventories were slightly down on the previous year. Capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment at BSH amounted to EUR 436 million. The effect of currency fluctuations not affecting income on acquisition and manufacturing costs amounted to EUR 43 million. The disposals in the year under review amounted to EUR 130 million. Depreciation and impairment in the financial year on property, plant and equipment amounted to EUR 144 million. While the additions for the period under review came out at EUR 270 million, negative currency changes of EUR 24 million had to be taken into account. The impairment of assets amounted to EUR 11 million. Net capital expenditure was made in property, plant and equipment in the financial year to the order of EUR 119 million. The carrying values of intangible assets decreased to EUR 237 million. This was attributable in particular to currency changes in relation to purchased intangible assets, almost exclusively goodwill. Overall, the changes in consolidated assets amounted to EUR 95 million. Deferred tax assets changed year-on-year by EUR 10 million to EUR 204 million (2010: EUR 194 million) following write-downs on tax loss carryforwards, tax credits and temporary differences. The domestic share was EUR 48 million while EUR 103 million was attributable abroad. Consolidation effects gave rise to EUR 53 million. Liabilities The amount reported for current and non-current liabilities increased by a total of EUR 533 million to EUR 5,026 million. This is 2.5 percentage points of total assets more than the comparable figures for the previous year. This is mainly due to changes in the debt owed, which represent a significant increase at EUR 518 million. In terms of content, this can be attributed to the issue of an offshore renminbi bond in Hong Kong and loans taken out to finance innovation, capital expenditure and growth and the initial gross reporting of discounted bills of exchange receivable in China. Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities amounted to EUR 2,173 million on the cut-off date. This represents an increase in liabilities of EUR 112 million and a share of total assets of 29.3 percent (2010: 29.9 percent); this is attributed by more than two thirds to trade payables. However, the proportion of total assets is slightly below the previous year. Due to the expansion of sales in the year under review and the planned further increase in 2012 as well as the maintenance of high standards by BSH in relation to delivery performance, there was an increase in inventories by EUR 79 million to EUR 1,305 million. 57 58 Pension obligations are covered nearly 100 percent by asset values and other fund assets. The current and non-current provisions – including pensions and other post-retirement benefits – amount to EUR 1,760 million and thus 23.7 percent of total assets. While the current and non-current provisions were reduced, an increase in provisions for pensions and other postretirement benefits was recorded over the previous year. This translates on balance and measured against the liabilities to a decrease of 3.2 percentage points. The change in provisions for pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations was essentially due to the decrease in the discount rate by 0.2 percentage points to 4.5 percent abroad. The interest rate remained constant at 5.3 percent however in Germany. The provision for pensions rose by 5.1 percent to EUR 886 million. Appropriate coverage of pension obligations is provided by term deposits and short and long-term financial investments in the capital market. The deferred tax liabilities amounted as in the previous year to EUR 22 million and are accounted for by EUR 4 million from abroad and EUR 1 million from Germany as well as EUR 17 million from the consolidation. Additions for “outside basis differences” at Group level are likewise included here. BSH’s equity is virtually unchanged at EUR 2,409 million. The biggest factors in the year under review are primarily the consolidated net profit and the distribution to shareholders as well as the differences arising from currency conversion. Other changes relate primarily to movements in the revaluation reserve, which did not impact profit and loss but caused changes in equity. These are especially unrealized gains and losses on securities held for sale and the actuarial results according to the actuarial report in relation to pension obligations. To a lesser extent, the change in the reserve to cover the floating cash flow hedges should also be mentioned here. Liabilities: Structure in % 2011 2010 15 15 Trade accounts payable 14 8 27 Financial liabilities Provisions 15 Other liabilities 35 Equity 24 15 32 7,435 6,901 Balance sheet total (in EUR million) M anagement of opportunities and risks | G R O U P M A N A G E M E N T R E P O R T Management of Opportunities and Risks Compliance management The BSH Compliance Organization consists of the Corporate Compliance Committee, the Office of the Compliance Committee as well as Regional Compliance Officers and Regional Compliance Committees in 45 countries. An external ombudsman complements the internal organization. In the year under review, the Office of the Compliance Committee was strengthened again enabling the Committee to again intensify in particular its legal compliance work. An important goal of preventive work on avoiding compliance violations includes among other things providing all employees of BSH with a binding framework on behaving in a responsible manner in accordance with the law. Group-wide and country-specific guidelines and regulations based on this are made available for this purpose. In addition, a comprehensive training program is available, complemented by targeted communication activities and ongoing advisory work. Within this set of rules, the Business Conduct Guidelines specify minimum standards; these guidelines contain globally uniform and binding rules on the conduct and business activities of all employees of the Group. A revised version of the Business Conduct Guidelines was published in 2011 and accompanied globally by comprehensive training and communication activities. It is ensured worldwide that all staff undertake their duties in compliance with the Business Conduct Guidelines and that executives also promote and monitor the compliance of employees under their responsibility. In all compliance instances, investigations are performed by the Compliance Organization – in accordance with defined processes – and appropriate measures are taken. As part of the employee survey conducted in 23 countries, questions concerning the perception and establishment of compliance within the company were answered for the first time in the year under review. The country-specific findings are incorporated into the work of the inter­ national Compliance Organization. Risk management The aim of risk management at BSH is to protect the Group from risks that would jeopardize its continued existence and to ensure sustained business success. The Risk Management Com­ mittee finalized a new process overview of Corporate Risk Management for this purpose in the year under review, which, in addition to Business Continuity Management, also includes crisis management and risk reporting. Corresponding processes in the areas of procurement, sales, finance and tax as well as project management ensure risk management in the business activities. Furthermore, an initiative began in the year under review to standardize and consolidate regulations relating to Corporate Risk Management. New risk management processes can now be seamlessly integrated into the revised main process and the rules of Corporate Risk Management. Due to the resulting synergies, Corporate Risk Management provides the basis for using the room to maneuver for achieving an optimized Group-wide risk-reward ratio. Group-wide and country­ specific guidelines are made available to provide all employees with a binding framework for behaving in a responsible manner in accordance with the law. 59 60 Due to the strong revenue growth, the Group continued to confront the issues of receivables management and customer credit risk even more intensively in order to control the sales risks. BSH uses various methods and processes for managing sales risks. Due to the strong revenue growth, the Group con­tinued to confront the issues of receivables management and customer credit risk even more intensively in order to control the sales risks. Customer-related credit risks are recorded and monitored in the framework of Group-wide reporting. Potential individual risks and concentrations of risks in the case of major accounts are identified in this way and controlled by the Corporate Credit Risk Committee using appropriate measures. It is therefore important for the Group to have adequate insurance coverage for credit losses, which is subject to regular review and adjustment. This is especially true for concentrated groups of customers of the Group. In addition, the personal contact represents another instrument for recording the customer’s actual situation and thereby further reducing the sales risk. All claims arising from the German-speaking countries are subjected to strict monitoring in a Shared Service Center in order to detect and prevent credit risks early on. In addition, each subsidiary of the Group is responsible for managing claims and credit risks. Special rules in relation to debt arrears allow targeted, timely and effective control of receivables management. The Risk Management Committee of BSH approved the orientation of the Group project for Information Risk Security Management in the year under review. This project is intended to include all critical information about the company. The Committee adopted the structure, content and organization of the project under the direction of the Information Technology department. In the context of four sub-projects, various topics will be dealt with in the coming years. These include, in particular, the classification, risk assessment and action planning for critical information. Other focal points include authorizations in IT systems, the creation of awareness of information risks and the implementation of Information Security Risk Management processes. The Tax Risk Management Committee of BSH is responsible for direct reporting of fiscal risks to the Board of Management. Early detection of opportunities and risks is of special importance in this context. Annual surveys and analyses in the context of a systematic, process-driven approach ensure identification of risks in relation to tax and duties. A uniform and established fiscal reporting system for the subsidiaries, the Tax Workbook, allows quarterly calculation of income tax of the Group. A close link with the accounting systems supports a consistent way of working and uniform monitoring of results. Thanks to the increased transparency, the recording, tracking and control of possible fiscal risks and opportunities will be promoted. According to their duration, the existing insurance contracts were reviewed and, if necessary, updated in the year under review in relation to their content and scope of coverage. The Transport Insurance Program applied group-wide in the BSH countries was further optimized in 2011 in cooperation with a new insurance partner. As a result of the positive claims experience, the Group can likewise point to improved con­ ditions for credit insurance. M anagement of opportunities and risks | G R O U P M A N A G E M E N T R E P O R T The cover provided for credit risks in BSH was also extended to other countries in 2011. Regarding the reported receivables, there is no concentration of credit risk owing to a sufficiently diversified customer structure and the preventive measures. In its operating business, BSH is subject to the risks of financing, currency and interest rate movements and commodity markets, which are monitored and controlled in the context of the operational activities in the areas of finance and procurement. In conclusion, BSH is able to state that it is currently not aware of any risk that threatens the continued existence of the Group as a going concern. Opportunities and risks for future development The Group has a differentiated view of the opportunities and risks regarding future sales and profit figures for large and small home appliances in accordance with the overall economic outlook. In line with the weaker economic development, further intensification of the challenging global competition is expected. Future risks still exist, especially in the markets of mainly southern European countries severely affected by the financial crisis. Opportunities may also arise for BSH in Western Europe owing to its excellent positioning, and customer acceptance and established market presence, however, this is against the background of an already well-developed market. Opportunities also exist in the growth regions of Eastern Europe, particularly in the main sales markets of Russia and Poland, but also – not least depending on currency – in Turkey. Risks continue to exist in the North American market due to the very aggressive competitive situation with destructive price competition in different segments. Additional opportunities may also arise, however, due to the expected slight economic recovery in the coming year and the measures taken in the past to clean up the segment. The Latin American growth countries including Peru, Chile and neighboring countries, could, accompanied by the economic outlook for the region, likewise offer opportunities for sales and profits for BSH. In Asia and Oceania, including notably China, India, Israel and Singapore, but also in Australia and New Zealand, BSH sees significant opportunities for further success, though, according to the projected lower growth in Asia, with less dynamic growth than in the past. BSH is hoping for additional growth opportunities from new market activities and the significant strengthening of its business in Southeast Europe and in Asia, especially China. Opportunities also exist in the growth regions of Eastern Europe, particularly in the main sales markets of Russia and Poland, but also – not least depending on currency – in Turkey. Future risks still exist, especially in the markets of mainly Southern European countries severely affected by the financial crisis. 61 62 The worldwide trend towards customized solutions for the consumption of specialty coffees and hot beverages as well as the excellent positioning of BSH brands and products in this segment will continue to offer opportunities in the future for further success in terms of sales and profits, not least in challenging markets such as the U.S. and Canada. In the areas along the value chain, BSH sees opportunities through operational excellence and high investment and through future successes of projects and initiatives already commenced. In the areas along the value chain, BSH sees opportunities through operational excellence and high investment and through future successes of projects and initiatives already commenced. The intensive activities and extensive spending on research and development in relation to improved products and innovative customer solutions, combined with the steady expansion of global, market-oriented product development, form an essential basis for the continued success of the BSH brands. The procurement area is opening up future opportunities and additional contributions to earnings through market-tailored, medium and long-term contracting as well as other bundling activities, but also through the strategic use of commodity derivatives. The progressive implementation and application of the BSH Production System and the ongoing application of modern production processes provide additional opportunities to increase efficiency. From the high level of capital expenditure on the renewal of production facilities and the expansion of capacities, opportunities are offered to service the regionally increasing market demand, to expand sales and increase profitability. Due to the excellent positioning of BSH as a top employer as well as comprehensive staff-related measures, BSH is countering the risks arising from the demographic development and the consequent competition for qualified employees. In addition, the success of these activities will also open up opportunities in future competition. Activities in the area of Supply Chain Management will support and promote the business success of BSH by intensifying interdisciplinary cooperation along the value chain. Future savings will also continue to be enabled through optimization of the processes. Through technology screening and the use of modern information technology and by adapting and developing its own IT solutions, the information technology department will continue to support the business and the success of the Group divisions as a successful partner and creative director. OUTLOOK | GROUP MANAGEMENT REPORT Outlook Events after the reporting date In a letter dated March 09, 2012, Siemens AG terminated the name and trademark license agreement of May 08, 2000 on December 31, 2012 to enable partial realignment of a seamlessly following up successor contract to be negotiated. Management does not expect any impact on the company as a result of this. Overall economic outlook The world economy finds itself in a difficult position at the beginning of 2012. The unresolved debt crisis in Europe and the continuously worsening banking crisis are stifling global growth. However, the industry proved to be quite resilient until recently. Possible risks of soaring oil prices – should tensions exacerbate in the Middle East – now also have to be taken into account. BSH is anticipating a further slowdown in global growth in 2012. World trade will be affected by this primarily and should only grow very slowly. The recent more favorable labor market data in the U.S., the continued good labor market situation in Germany and the continuation of economic development in emerging countries are leading to an expectation of robust growth in private demand, even if less dynamic than in previous years. The biggest single risk that BSH foresees is in further exacerbation of the debt crisis in Europe. This would noticeably strain growth in Europe in particular but also extend to other regions due to global interdependence. Growth in gross domestic product of only 2 ½ percent is assumed for the world economy in 2012, which is well below the long-term average of 3 ¼ percent. Even if the emerging markets again record above average growth in value added, the plus of just 5 percent would be noticeably lower than the long-term average of 6 ¼ percent. Growth in developed countries at 1 ½ percent on the other hand will be barely lower than in 2011. However, this is primarily due to the development in Japan, where the reconstruction of the regions devastated by earthquake and tsunami should give rise to a 2 ¼ percent increase in gross domestic product. In Western Europe, however, the debt crisis and the slowing of world trade will only allow modest growth of a half percent. As in the previous year, economic development in 2012 will vary considerably at regional level. The value added in the southern European states will therefore at best stagnate, but will shrink in most cases, however, sometimes significantly. The Group is expecting further growth in Germany on the other hand. This should however remain one percent behind the high growth rates of 2010 and 2011. BSH rates the economic outlook for the USA as good. In particular, the recent improvement in the labor market and the continuing robust growth of industrial production point to a continu­ ation of the economic recovery. However, the high public debt and the continuing high asset losses in the private sector are dampening further development. However, the decision in the United States to continue transfer payments agreed at the height of the financial market crisis in 2009 is signaling that BSH’s expectation of an increase in economic output in the U.S. by only 2 percent may be cautious. The emerging economies will continue again in 2012 to make the largest contribution to global economic growth. However, the slower expansion of world trade and the declining support by economic policy is slowing down development. Notwithstanding this, investment, particularly in infrastructure, as well as private consumption, which is favored by the slowdown in inflation, will continue to expand significantly. Later in the year, the dynamic in these countries should increase again, as the economic policy has recently begun again to stimulate the economy. Among the emerging markets, the most dynamic will again come from Asia. These Asian countries at nearly 6 ½ percent will grow more than twice as fast as the emerging economies in Latin America and Eastern Europe (each around 3 percent). BSH is anticipating a further slowdown in global growth in 2012. World trade will be affected by this primarily and should only grow very slowly. Growth in gross domestic product of only 2 ½ percent is assumed for the world economy in 2012. 63 64 Outlook for the sector and Group Against the backdrop of some very difficult overall economic conditions, the global market for large home appliances will continue to develop differently at regional level. The Western European market is expected to stagnate at best in 2012. BSH believes that the German market will continue to grow at a slower pace, while the situation on the southern European markets will remain tense. The majority of these markets are likely to shrink again in 2012. Further growth, although at a lower level than last year, is expected for Eastern Europe. Growth drivers are likely to remain Russia and Turkey. In the non-European markets, the North American market should recover slightly in 2012 and remain at about the same level as last year. Both the Latin American market and the Asian markets are likely to have a similar growth in 2012 as the year before. The market for home appliances in China, which in the past recorded extremely high growth rates of more than 20 percent at times, is not expected to reach these levels again. Despite increasing challenges from the market and competition, BSH is expecting continued solid market growth in 2012 similar to the previous year, with low growth rate increases in the coming years. BSH is setting itself sales targets for the next few years above those for the year under review. Against this background, BSH is setting itself sales targets for the next few years above those for the year under review. Only when these goals are achieved, can the demanding expectations for future financial results, which exceed those for the previous year, also be met. Business performance at the beginning of 2012 is strengthening BSH’s expectation that revenue and profit will be on a par with business planning for 2012. BSH also anticipates strong business performance in 2013. The BSH Board of Management is not aware of any developments of any importance after the balance sheet date that may significantly impact the net assets, financial position or results of operations of the Group. Munich, March 28, 2012 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH The Board of Management KOLUMNENT IT EL | KOLUMNENT IT EL | Consolidated Financial Statements A sound financial position is the foundation for BSH’s sustainable growth strategy, and we were able to preserve our comfortable capital base in 2011. Our continued low gearing ratio means that Standard & Poor’s has confirmed our outstanding company rating with a stable outlook. 65| Consolidated Financial Statements 66 Consolidated Statement of Income 67 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 68 Consolidated Balance Sheet 70 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 71 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 72 | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 72 Accounting Policies 82 Notes to the Consolidated Statement of Income 87 Notes to the Balance Sheet 112 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Fixed Assets 65 66 Consolidated Statement of Income January 1 to December 31, 2011 in EUR million Note 2011 20101) Revenue 4 9,654 9,073 Cost of sales 5 6,077 5,609 3,577 3,464 Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses 6 2,582 2,357 Research and development expenses 7 298 277 Other operating income 8 353 303 Other operating expenses 8 357 363 693 770 60 53 Operating profit Finance income Finance cost Other net finance income/cost 9 9 169 116 10 – 46 – 16 538 691 164 224 374 467 373 465 1 2 Profit/loss before tax Tax on profits 11 Profit after tax Of which attributable to Shareholders of the parent (consolidated net profit) Non-controlling shareholders 12 1 ) Values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. For further information see Notes 2.2 and 9. CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F CO M P R E H E NS I V E I N CO M E | CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income January 1 to December 31, 2011 in EUR million 2011 2010 Profit after taxes 374 467 Gains and losses on translating foreign operations – 77 85 Gains and losses on available-for-sale financial assets – 25 10 – 5 2 – 29 – 53 Gains and losses from cash flow hedging instruments (CFH) Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit pension plans and similar obligations Income taxes relating to components of other comprehensive income Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income 11 10 – 125 54 249 521 248 519 1 2 Total comprehensive income attributable to The parent Non-controlling shareholders 67 68 Consolidated Balance Sheet January 1 to December 31, 2011 in EUR million Note 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 Cash and cash equivalents 14 511 575 Securities 15 69 19 Trade accounts receivable 16 2,259 1,735 53 37 Other current assets 17 379 427 Inventories 18 1,305 1,226 4,576 4,019 ASSETS Current assets Current recoverable income taxes Total current assets Non-current assets Non-current financial assets 19 763 891 Property, plant and equipment 20 1,655 1,536 Intangible assets 21 237 261 Deferred tax assets 11 204 194 Total non-current assets 2,859 2,882 Total assets 7,435 6,901 CO NS O L I DAT E D B A L A N C E S H E E T | CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S in EUR million Note 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES Current liabilities Financial liabilities 22 471 288 Trade accounts payable 23 1,100 1,020 12 12 1,029 Current income tax liabilities Other current liabilities 24 1,061 Other current provisions 24 465 489 3,109 2,838 580 245 Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Financial liabilities 22 Other non-current liabilities 25 20 20 Other non-current provisions 25 409 525 Provisions for pensions and similar obligations 26 886 843 Deferred tax liabilities 11 22 22 1,917 1,655 Total non-current liabilities Equity Subscribed capital 27 125 125 Retained earnings and other reserves 27 1,903 1,798 373 465 8 20 Total shareholders’ equity 2,409 2,408 Total shareholders’ equity and liabilities 7,435 6,901 Consolidated net profit Non-controlling shareholders 27 69 70 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows January 1 to 31 December 31, 2011 in EUR million Note 2011 20101) 374 467 11 164 224 538 691 – 1 – 2 295 295 Profit after taxes Income taxes Profit before tax Non-controlling interests 12 Depreciation, amortization and impairment of non-current assets and reversals of impairment losses Gains and losses on disposal of assets Net finance cost 9 Finance cost paid Finance income received Income taxes paid Other non-cash income and expenses – 2 2 109 63 – 66 – 54 51 46 – 227 – 239 – 61 – 82 Change in assets and liabilities Change in inventories Change in trade accounts receivable and other accounts receivable Change in trade accounts payable and other liabilities – 82 – 140 – 608 8 51 324 Change in provisions – 86 82 Change in deferred taxes – 12 – 10 – 101 984 0 0 – 453 – 403 Net cash outflow (2010: net cash inflow) from operating activities 28 Payments for financial assets Payments for investments in intangible assets and property, plant and equipment Proceeds from the disposal of assets Additions to financial receivables Decrease in financial receivables Investments in securities (available-for-sale) Disposal of securities (available-for-sale) Net cash used in investing activities 28 Dividend payments Non-controlling interests Proceeds from borrowings Repayment of financial liabilities Net cash inflow (2010: net cash outflow) from financing activities 28 Net change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 28 Change in cash and cash equivalents due to changes in exchange rates Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 28 19 9 0 – 21 139 0 – 724 – 810 810 698 – 209 – 527 – 234 – 653 –12 7 1,195 111 – 706 – 103 243 – 638 – 67 – 181 575 742 3 14 511 575 1 ) Values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. For further information see Notes 2.2 and 9. CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F C H A N G E S I N S H A R E H O L D E R S ’ EQ U I T Y | CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity January 1 to December 31, 2011 mp a t co are n - co in te n t r o l l in res t g s he p by t e ld it y h Ac tu ar i p e n al g ain si o n s/lo ss e pr o s on v isi o ns D er i v at (cas ive fina h flo n c ia wh e d g l ins t r u men ing ) ts v al o f s ue mea e cu r i t ie sur e m ent s sl a t C um ul a t i ve t r an ing s e ar n ine d – 65 37 0 14 2,519 16 2,535 465 – – – – 465 2 467 Net income recognized directly in equity N on 2,408 – Balance at 01.01.2010 E qu 125 Profit after taxes in EUR million Fair Re t a Total shareholders’ equity Sub s cr i bed c ap i t al ion dif f er en ny ce s Note 27 – – 85 6 1 – 38 54 0 54 Total comprehensive income – 465 85 6 1 – 38 519 2 521 Dividend payments – – 650 – – – – – 650 – 3 – 653 Other changes – – – – – – – 5 5 125 2,223 20 43 1 – 24 2,388 20 2,408 Profit after taxes – 373 – – – – 373 1 374 Net income recognized directly in equity – – – 77 – 23 – 3 – 22 –125 0 – 125 Total comprehensive income – 373 –77 –23 – 3 – 22 248 1 249 Dividend payments – – 233 – – – – –233 – 1 –234 Balance at 31.12.2010 Other changes Balance at 31.12.2011 – – 2 – – – – – 2 – 12 – 14 125 2,361 – 57 20 – 2 – 46 2,401 8 2,409 71 72 | NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1General BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH-D) was formed in 1967 as a joint venture of Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, and Siemens AG, Berlin and Munich. The activities of the BSH Group (hereafter referred to as “Group” or “BSH”) comprise: the manufacture or procurement and marketing, as well as research and development, of industrial products in the area of electrical engineering, precision mechanics, and related technology, especially in the area of home appliances, the manufacture or procurement and marketing of goods for use as accessories, auxiliary materials, or tools with the manufactured or marketed products. The registered office of the parent company (BSH-D) is situated at Carl-Wery-Strasse 34, 81739 Munich, Germany. The Board of Management prepared and approved the consolidated financial statements for publication on March 28, 2012. 2 Presentation of accounting policies The following significant accounting policies were used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements of BSH: 2.1 Statement of compliance The consolidated financial statements of BSH for the year ended December 31, 2011, have been prepared in accordance with the mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), London, as adopted by the European Union (EU) and in force on the balance sheet date, and the additional requirements under commercial law pursuant to Section 315a (1) of the German Commercial Code (HGB). 2.2 Basis of presentation The Group currency of BSH is the euro; unless stated otherwise, all amounts are reported in millions of euros (EUR million). The income statement is presented using the function-of-expense format. For the purposes of clarity in the presentation, various captions in the balance sheet and income statement have been aggregated. Please refer to the notes for separate disclosure and explanations. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, with the following exception: financial assets held for trading and available-for-sale financial assets are recognized at fair value. The accounting policies described below have been consistently applied over the reporting periods covered by these consolidated financial statements. An exception to this is the change in the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations, which are disclosed within net finance income/cost from 2011 onwards for greater transparency. These amounts were allocated to the individual functional areas in prior years. The effect on the prior year figures in the consolidated statement of income is shown in Note 9 (“Finance income and finance expense”). These accounting policies have also been uniformly applied by the companies in the Group. ACCO U N T I N G P O L I C I E S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 2.3 Amendments to accounting standards 2.3.1 Standards and interpretations with mandatory application requirement from January 1, 2011 onwards The Group implemented all accounting standards with mandatory application requirement from the 2011 financial year onwards. The following standards and interpretations were applied for the first time in the reporting period and have affected the consolidated financial statements: Annual Innovations (AIP 2010). Changes to IFRS 1, IFRS 3, IFRS 7, IAS 1, IAS 27, IAS 34, IFRIC 13 Various changes or corrections to existing IFRSs or follow-up amendments through previous modifications to other IFRSs. The amendments have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of BSH. The following standards and interpretations have no impact on the consolidated financial statements: Change to IAS 24 “Related Party Disclosures” The definition of related parties has been fundamentally revised by the changes. Also, exemptions from mandatory disclosure were granted to state-controlled entities. The amendments have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of BSH. Change to IAS 32 “Classification of Rights Issues” Concerns the requirements for the accounting treatment of foreign currency-denominated rights issues for companies listed on different international stock exchanges. Rights and options to purchase equity instruments are accordingly treated as equity instruments irrespective of their currency. Change to IFRS 1 “Limited Exemption from IFRS 7 Comparative Disclosures for First-time Adopters” This amendment to IFRS 1 provides first-time adopters with the same relief from providing the comparative figures in connection with improved disclosures on financial instruments pursuant to IFRS 7. Changes to IFRIC 14 “IAS 19 – The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements, and their Interaction” The interpretation concerns pension plans, for which minimum financing requirements exist. If the company makes advance contributions, then it may recognize these as an asset. The amendments have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of BSH. Adoption of IFRIC 19 “Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments” The interpretation applies when debt capital is exchanged for an issuer’s equity instruments (debt-equity swap). IFRIC 19 clarifies that equity instruments issued as part of a conversion should be regarded as a component of the remuneration paid to extinguish the financial liability. 73 74 2.3.2 Standards and interpretations that have been approved but not yet applied The consolidated financial statements for financial year 2011 do not take account of the following new or revised accounting standards that have already been approved by the IASB as there was no obligation to implement these standards. Standard/ Interpretation Mandatory for financial years beginning on or after Adoption by the EU by 31.12.2011 Anticipated effects IFRS 1 Amendment in relation to severe hyperinflation 01.07.2011 No None IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Amendment on enhancing disclosures about transfers of financial assets 01.07.2011 Yes Nothing material IFRS 9 Financial instruments 01.01.2015 No Classification and measurement of financial assets IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements 01.01.2013 No Nothing material IFRS 11 Joint arrangements 01.01.2013 No Nothing material IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests in other entities 01.01.2013 No Nothing material IFRS 13 Fair value measurement 01.01.2013 No Uniformity and comparability of the associated “fair value hier­ archy” IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements 01.07.2012 No Presentation of other compre­ hensive income IAS 12 Income taxes: limited amendment in relation to the recovery of the underlying assets 01.01.2012 No Nothing material IAS 19 (2011) Employee Benefits 01.01.2013 No Effects on the expected return on plan assets IAS 27 (2011) Separate financial statements 01.01.2013 No Nothing material IAS 28 (2011) Investments in associated companies and joint ventures 01.01.2013 No Nothing material IAS 32 Financial instruments: Presentation – offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities 01.01.2014 No Nothing material IFRIC 20 Stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine 01.01.2013 No None 2.4 Foreign currency translation Foreign currency transactions included in the annual financial statements of BSH-D and the subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the balance sheet date, monetary items denominated in foreign currency are recognized using the closing rate. Any translation differences are recognized in the income statement. The financial statements of consolidated subsidiaries prepared in foreign currency are translated on the basis of the functional currency concept (IAS 21 “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”) using the modified closing rate method. The foreign subsidiaries that are part of the BSH Group carry out their activities independently from a financial, economic, and organizational point of view, and for this reason, the functional currency is always the same as ACCO U N T I N G P O L I C I E S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S the company’s local currency. All assets and liabilities (but not equity) are translated at the closing rate. The line items included in the income statement are translated at the annual average rate. All resulting exchange rate differences are taken directly to a currency translation reserve in other comprehensive income (OCI). In the separate financial statements of BSH-D and the subsidiaries, foreign currency receivables and payables are measured on initial recognition at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction. Any exchange rate gains and losses at the balance sheet date are recognized in the income statement. The exchange rates of one euro for the most important currencies used for currency translation have changed as follows: Closing rate 31.12.2011 Average rate 31.12.2010 2011 2010 US dollar (USD) 1.2939 1.3362 1.3920 1.3257 Pound sterling (GBP) 0.8353 0.8608 0.8679 0.8579 Russian ruble (RUB) 41.7650 40.8200 40.8846 40.2629 Turkish lira (TRY) 2.4497 2.0601 2.3273 1.9944 Chinese renminbi (CNY) 8.1625 8.8065 9.0014 8.9740 2.5 Basis of consolidation and consolidation principles The consolidated financial statements include BSH-D and all companies under its control. This control usually exists if BSH-D, directly or indirectly, holds over 50% of the voting rights of the subscribed capital of an entity or has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the entity. The interests of minority shareholders in the Group’s equity and profits are reported separately on the face of the balance sheet and income statement. Consolidation starts from the date on which the BSH Group acquires the option of control. It ends when this option is no longer available. The financial statements of BSH-D and its consolidated subsidiaries have been prepared, audited and included in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IAS 27 with the application of accounting policies that are uniform throughout the BSH Group. Consolidated as of 31.12.2010 Germany Other countries Total 66 11 55 Consolidated for the first time in 2011 0 2 2 De-consolidated in 2011 (including mergers) 0 0 0 11 57 68 Consolidated as of 31.12.2011 See note 3 for more information on changes to the basis of consolidation. The consolidated entities also include a fund. As of December 31, 2011, seven (2010: four) companies were not consolidated because they have no or only insignificant operating activities. This does not have any material impact on the Group’s financial position or financial performance. In addition, BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte Altersfürsorge GmbH, Munich, is not consolidated because its assets are defined as plan assets and these are deducted from pension provisions in accordance with IAS 19. The consolidated financial statements and group management report of BSH are published in the electronic German Federal Gazette. See Annex II of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on shareholdings. 75 76 Acquisitions are accounted for on the basis of the fair values applicable at the date of acquisition or first-time consolidation. Any debit difference between purchase price and fair values is recognized as goodwill. Intra-group balances and intra-group transactions as well as resulting intragroup profits and losses are eliminated in full. Deferred tax is recognized for consolidation transactions recognized in the income statement. 2.6Revenue Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when ownership or risk and reward are transferred to the customer, a price has been agreed or can be determined, and its payment can be expected. Revenue is reported net of discounts, price reductions, customer bonuses, and rebates. Royalties are recognized on an accrual basis in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement. 2.7 Research and development costs Research expenditure is recognized as an expense when incurred. Likewise, development expenditure is recognized as an expense when incurred. This does not apply to project development costs that fully meet the following criteria: – The product or system is clearly defined and the relevant expenditure can be clearly assigned and reliably measured; – The technical feasibility of the product can be demonstrated; – The product or system will be either marketed or used internally; – The assets will generate future economic benefits (e.g., the entity can demonstrate the existence of a market for the product or, if it is to be used internally, its usefulness); – There are adequate technical, financial, and other resources to complete the project. Costs are capitalized from the time the above criteria are met. Costs recognized as expenses in previous accounting periods are not capitalized retrospectively. 2.8 Trade accounts receivable Trade accounts receivable are reported at amortized cost. Any necessary valuation allowances, which are based on the probable risk of default, are taken into account. Write-downs on trade accounts receivable are recognized using valuation allowance accounts. Non-interest-bearing or low-interest bearing receivables with maturities of more than one year are discounted. If the requirements of IAS 32.42 are met, receivables and payables are netted. 2.9Inventories Inventories are recognized at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Work in process and finished goods are recognized at the cost of conversion. This includes all costs directly assignable to the production process and an appropriate portion of production overheads. In turn, this includes production-related depreciation, a proportion of administrative costs and pro rata employee benefit costs. Borrowing costs are not capitalized. Inventory risks that result from the duration of storage or reduced usefulness or marketability are taken into account by recognizing write-downs. The net realizable value is recognized at the balance sheet date if this value is lower than the cost. When the circumstances that previously caused inventories to be written down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase in net realizable value because of changed economic circumstances, the amount of the writedown is reversed (i.e. the reversal is limited to the amount of the original write-down) so that the new carrying amount is the lower of the cost and the revised net realizable value. ACCO U N T I N G P O L I C I E S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 2.10 Financial instruments A financial instrument is a contract that simultaneously leads to a financial asset in one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument in another. Financial instruments involve nonderivative as well as derivative assets or liabilities. The shares in non-consolidated affiliated companies and associates reported under financial assets are recognized at cost, unless a different market value is available. As specified by IAS 39, financial investments are broken down into the following categories: (a) held-to-maturity investments, (b)financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, (c) available-for-sale financial assets, and (d) loans and receivables. Financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, other than loans and receivables, are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Financial assets obtained principally to generate a profit from short-term fluctuations in price or exchange rates are measured and classified at fair value through profit or loss. Securities held as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and securities held for trading are recognized at market value, if available. If no market value is available, they are carried at cost. Changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are recognized through the income statement. All other financial assets, other than loans and receivables originated by the Company, are classified as available-for-sale financial assets. Until realized, gains and losses on the fairvalue measurement of an available-for-sale financial asset are recognized in equity, taking deferred tax into account. Available-for-sale financial assets are measured in accordance with IAS 39.61. 2.11 Property, plant and equipment Property, plant, and equipment is measured at cost, less straight-line depreciation and, in some cases, impairment losses. Low-value assets are written off in the year of acquisition. The cost of internally generated property, plant, and equipment comprises all direct costs and a reasonable portion of the necessary material and production overheads. This includes production-related depreciation, as well as a proportion of the costs for the Company’s pension plan and voluntary employee benefits. Borrowing costs for qualifying assets are capitalized in accordance with IAS 23. Depreciation is based on the following useful lives: Buildings 12.0– 33.3 years Machinery and equipment 6.0–13.0 years Office equipment and vehicles 3.0 – 8.0 years Land is not depreciated. Excepted from this are leaseholds and other interests in land, which are depreciated over the duration of the contract. 77 78 In accordance with IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”, impairment losses are recognized on property, plant, and equipment if both the realizable value and the value in use of the asset concerned fall below its carrying amount. An impairment loss is then recognized to reduce the carrying amount of the asset to the lower of realizable value and value in use. If the reasons for an impairment loss no longer apply, the impairment loss is reversed, but the increased carrying amount must not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of amortization) if no impairment loss had been recognized. Amortization and impairment losses charged during the year under review are reported under functional costs or other operating expenses. Reversals of impairment losses are reported under functional costs or other operating income. 2.12 Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) Purchased and internally generated intangible assets are carried at cost. Assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. Borrowing costs are capitalized for qualifying assets. Amortization is based on the following useful lives: Patents, licenses and customer basesin accordance with normal operating life (contract, license period, etc.) Purchased software 4 years Internally generated intangible assets 4 – 6 years Amortization is applied using the straight-line method. An impairment loss is recognized if an asset is found to be impaired. If the reasons for an impairment loss no longer apply, the impairment loss is reversed, but the increased carrying amount must not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of depreciation) if no impairment loss had been recognized. Assets with infinite useful lives are not amortized. Depreciation and impairment losses charged during the year under review are reported under functional costs or other operating expenses. Reversals of impairment losses are reported under functional costs or other operating income. 2.13 Impairment losses on property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets To meet the requirements of IFRS 3, in combination with IAS 36, and to test for goodwill impairment, the Group has defined cash-generating units that match the legal entities or countries. These cash-generating units were subjected to an impairment test. For the purposes of an impairment test, the carrying amount of each cash-generating unit is determined by allocating assets and liabilities, including attributable goodwill and intangible assets. An impairment loss is recognized if the recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit is lower than its carrying amount. The recoverable amount is fair value less costs to sell or value in use (value of expected future cash inflows from the asset), whichever is the higher. ACCO U N T I N G P O L I C I E S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S For its impairment tests, BSH used a discounted cash flow (DCF) method to determine the expected future cash inflows from a cash-generating unit. The calculation of the cash flows of each cash generating unit is based on business plans with a planning horizon of three years. Inflation-related growth rates specific to each country were assumed after the end of the three-year planning period. The discount rate for each country (including an additional risk factor) amounted to between 5.9% p.a. and 17.5% p.a. (2010: between 8.2% p.a. and 16.9% p.a.). An interest rate of 17.5% p.a. was used for the Group’s Greek subsidiary (see also Note 20). 2.14Goodwill Goodwill is recognized in accordance with IFRS 3. Goodwill is tested for impairment regularly at least once a year; if required, an appropriate impairment loss is recognized. Under IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”, any requirement for an impairment loss is determined by comparing the expected future discounted cash flows of the cash-generating unit in question with the relevant goodwill amount attributable to the unit. 2.15 Pension provisions Provisions for pensions and other post-retirement benefits are recognized using the projected unit credit method as specified in IAS 19 “Employee Benefits”. In addition to the pensions and vested benefits known as of the balance sheet date, this method takes into account expected future increases in salaries and pensions. If pension obligations are covered by plan assets, only the net amount is reported. The calculation is based on actuarial reports taking into account biometric calculation methods. The actuarial gains and losses that arose in the year under review are recognized in other comprehensive income in accordance with IAS 19.93A et seq. 2.16Provisions A provision is recognized if a present (legal or constructive) obligation exists as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are tested at each balance sheet date and adjusted to the current best estimate. Where a provision is assessed using the estimated cash flows for settling the obligation, the carrying amount of the provision is the present value of these cash flows. Where discounting is used, the carrying amount of a provision increases in each period to reflect the passage of time. This increase is recognized under other net finance income/cost. 2.17 Derivative financial instruments Derivative financial instruments are employed solely for hedging purposes in order to reduce exchange rate, interest rate and fair value risks from operating business and any resultant finance requirements. According to IAS 39, all derivative financial instruments such as commodity, interest rate and currency derivatives and combinations thereof, are recognized at fair value, regardless of the purpose or intention behind them. The fair value of derivative financial instruments is determined on the basis of market data and recognized valuation techniques. With support from IT systems, derivative financial instruments are marked to market by discounting cash flows or by using option price models with parameters in line with market conditions. The effective portion of the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, for which cash flow hedge accounting is applied, is recognized in equity as part of accumulated other shareholders’ equity. It is reclassified to the income statement at the 79 80 same time as the hedged item is realized. That part of the change in fair value not covered by the underlying transaction is immediately recognized in the income statement. If hedge accounting cannot be applied, the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments is recognized in the income statement. The change in fair value and the realization of derivative financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, which hedge the operative hedged items, is shown under other operating expenses or income. The change in fair value and the realization of derivatives for hedging financial hedged items is recognized in other net finance income/cost. If this involves “combined instruments”, for which separate measurement of the embedded derivative instruments is not possible, the entire “combined instrument” is recognized at fair value through profit or loss. 2.18Leases A lease is classified as an operating lease if the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership. Lease payments under an operating lease are recognized as an expense and allocated equally to each period of the lease term. 2.19 Government grants A government grant is not recognized until there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attaching to it, and that BSH will receive the grant. Government grants are recognized as income on a systematic and rational basis over the periods necessary to match them with the related costs that they are intended to compensate. Grants received for the acquisition of property, plant, and equipment are treated as a reduction in the cost of such assets. Other grants received are initially recognized as a liability on the balance sheet (miscellaneous other liabilities), which is then used to offset the corresponding depreciation charges over the useful life of the asset concerned. 2.20 Management judgment The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRSs requires that assumptions and estimates be made that may impact on the amount recognized for the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, income and expenses, as well as contingent liabilities. Estimates and assumptions may change over time and have a significant impact on the Group’s financial position and performance. The assumptions and estimates relate primarily to the measurement of property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets, impairment of assets, the recognition and measurement of provisions, and the extent to which future tax benefits can be realized. The estimates and assumptions are regularly assessed and adjusted if necessary. At the time of preparation of the consolidated financial statements, no material changes to the underlying assumptions and estimates were anticipated. Allowances on doubtful receivables reflect to a significant extent current assumptions and estimates for specific receivables that are based on the current credit rating of the customer in question and the economic environment in the country concerned. ACCO U N T I N G P O L I C I E S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets are tested for impairment at least once a year. The measurement methods used are based on discounted cash flows and use weighted average costs of capital, estimated growth rates and tax rates. The planning horizon is a three-year plan approved by management. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that they are likely to be realized in future. The assessment of this is determined by the extent to which taxable profits will be generated in future, against which previously unused tax loss carryforwards and tax credits can be utilized and temporary valuation differences are reversed. Provisions for pensions and similar obligations and the corresponding expenses and income are recognized on the basis of actuarial methods. The main estimated variables are discount factors, the expected return on plan assets, salary and pension trends, and life expectancies. The parameters are defined according to circumstances as of the balance sheet date. Due to fluctuating market and economic conditions, these actuarial assumptions may differ considerably from future developments and may therefore lead to a material change in the obligations for pensions and other post retirement benefits. The measurement of provisions for warranties, onerous contracts and litigation involves significant future estimates, some of which are determined on the basis of past experience and adjusted in line with the latest assessment. 3 Change to the basis of consolidation The subsidiaries BSH Household Appliances Manufacturing Private Limited (Mumbai), India, and BSH Home Appliances Limited (Yongin-City), South Korea, which were newly established in the year under review, were included in the consolidated financial statements for the first time. 81 82 4Revenue Revenue was primarily generated from electrical and gas appliances, as well as from related customer services; it breaks down as follows: in EUR million 2011 % 2010 % 2,062 21.4 1,906 21.0 Western Europe (excluding Germany) 3,514 36.4 3,540 39.0 Eastern Europe (including Turkey) 1,846 19.1 1,598 17.6 479 5.0 534 5.9 Germany North America Latin America Asia Rest of world Total 51 0.5 45 0.5 1,506 15.6 1,281 14.1 196 2.0 169 1.9 9,654 100.0 9,073 100.0 5 Cost of sales The cost of sales figure of EUR 6,077 million (2010: EUR 5,609 million 1)) comprises the full production-related costs incurred in the manufacture of the products sold. 6 Selling and administrative expenses Selling and administrative expenses amounted to EUR 2,582 million (2010: EUR 2,357 million 1)) and comprised solely costs, income and expenses allocated to these categories. General and administrative expenses include personnel costs, other administrative expenses and depreciation/amortization in corporate departments that cannot be assigned to production, sales and marketing, or research and development. 7 Research and development costs Research and development costs amounting to EUR 298 million (2010: EUR 277 million 1)) include research costs and development costs not recognized in the balance sheet. No development costs were capitalized during 2011, as in the previous year. 1 ) Values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. For further information see Notes 2.2 and 9. 8 Other operating income and expenses in EUR million Income from the reversal of provisions (not function-related) Foreign currency gains on trade accounts receivable and payable Income from the reversal of allowances on and remeasurement of receivables 2011 2010 25 37 109 94 27 19 Rental and leasing income 1 4 Gains on the disposal of assets 7 4 44 63 Gains on foreign exchange derivatives Income from costs transferred to third parties 42 35 Other operating income 2) 98 47 353 303 Expenses to set up provisions (not function-related) 93 114 Foreign currency losses on trade accounts receivable and payable 98 80 Expenses from allowances on receivables 39 35 Total other operating income Losses on the disposal of assets Impairment losses Other taxes 5 7 11 14 7 1 Losses on foreign exchange derivatives 37 78 Other operating expenses 2) 67 34 357 363 Total other operating expenses 2 ) O ther operating income contains insurance settlements amounting to EUR 46 million (2010: EUR 0 million). Against these are expenses from underlying insured events, of which EUR 44 million (2010: EUR 0 million) are contained within other operating expenses. N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F I N CO M E | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 9 Finance income and finance cost in EUR million 2011 Finance income Finance cost 2010 60 53 169 116 – 109 – 63 35 29 – of which to non-consolidated affiliated companies EUR 0.2 million (2010: EUR 0.1 million) Net finance income/cost Allocation as specified by IFRS 7.20 (b) using IAS 39 measurement categories: – Loans and receivables – Financial assets, available-for-sale – Financial liabilities carried at amortized cost 15 14 – 112 – 55 – 47 – 51 No allocation as specified by IFRS 7.20 (b): Interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations In 2011, BSH decided to change its reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations and has allocated these to finance cost and finance income within net finance income/cost. These amounts were allocated to the individual functional areas in prior years (see also Note 2.2). The adjustment to the prior year figures in the consolidated statement of income can be seen in the table below: in EUR million 2011 2011 incl. interest as specified by IAS 19 1) Cost of sales 6,077 0 5,609 16 5,625 Selling and administrative expenses 2,582 0 2,357 29 2,386 298 0 277 6 283 60 8 53 7 46 169 55 116 58 58 Research and development expenses Finance income Finance cost Interest as specified by IAS 19 1) 1 2010 after adjustment Adjustment of interest as specified by IAS 19 1) 2010 before adjustment 47 51 ) Interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations Interest income and expense calculated under the effective interest rate method was recognized in the income statement for financial assets and financial liabilities not measured at fair value. Interest expenses were reduced for the first time in 2011 by capitalized borrowing costs for qualifying assets amounting to EUR 0.4 million. The borrowing rate used for this purpose was 3.0%. 10 Other net finance income/cost Other net finance income/cost relates to the fair-value measurement as well as the realization of derivatives for hedging financial items, the disposal of securities, the measurement of receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currency, interest cost arising from the unwinding of the discount on provisions, and miscellaneous other finance income and expense. In 2011, available-for-sale financial assets were sold. This resulted in an increase in equity of EUR 5 million (2010: decrease in equity of EUR 15 million) and the recognition of an equivalent figure as an expense (2010: income) under net finance income/cost. Expenses according to IAS 39.67 amounted to EUR 11 million (2010: EUR 3 million). As in 2010, income generated from reversals of impairments of debt instruments was immaterial. 83 84 11 Income tax The breakdown of the BSH Group’s tax on income by source is as follows: in EUR million Current tax Deferred tax Total income tax 2011 2010 164 232 0 – 8 164 224 Income tax paid or payable in the various countries as well as deferred tax is reported under income tax. Deferred tax is calculated on the basis of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the IFRS financial statements and those in the tax base, and on the basis of consolidation transactions, recoverable loss carryforwards and tax credits. The calculation is based on the tax rates expected to be in force in the various countries at the time the asset is realized or the liability is settled. In all cases, the rates are derived from the laws and provisions in force or enacted at the balance sheet date. Germany’s corporate income tax rate in 2011 was 15% plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% of the corporate income tax charge. Taking into account trade tax at 13.66%, the overall tax rate for the companies in the German tax group was 29.49% (2010: 29.35%). The reported income tax expense in the year under review of EUR 164 million is EUR 5 million higher than the expected income tax expense of EUR 159 million, which would in theory arise if the German tax rate were to be applied to the consolidated profit before tax. The reconciliation between the expected tax expense and the reported tax expense is as follows: in EUR million 2011 2010 Profit before tax 538 691 Expected tax charge when using the tax rate applicable to the parent company of 29.49% (2010: 29.35%) 159 203 Effects of differences in foreign tax rates –28 – 40 2 – 3 Effects of permanent differences Effects of changes in tax rates 18 72 Tax expenses relating to other periods 19 3 Change in the recoverability of deferred tax assets – 8 – 12 Other changes 2 1 164 224 30.5 32.5 in EUR million 2011 2010 Deferred tax assets 204 194 Reported income tax expense Group tax rate (in %) Deferred tax in the consolidated balance sheet: Deferred tax liabilities Total deferred tax 22 22 182 172 Of the deferred tax assets and liabilities, the following items were recognized in equity: Deferred tax assets (+) and liabilities (–) recognized directly in OCI (in EUR million) Available-for-sale financial assets Cash flow hedging instruments 2011 2010 – 6 – 7 1 – 1 Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit pension plans and similar obligations 17 9 Total 12 1 N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F I N CO M E | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Deferred tax assets and liabilities are derived from the following individual balance sheet items: Deferred tax assets in EUR million Deferred tax liabilities 2011 2010 2011 2010 Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment 34 25 63 58 Receivables and other assets 28 26 28 26 Inventories 66 56 4 4 Liabilities 51 51 26 2 Other provisions 82 106 2 2 Pension provisions 67 49 1 0 3 0 5 8 113 88 0 0 0 0 0 11 444 401 129 111 Impairment losses –133 – 118 0 0 Netting – 107 – 89 – 107 – 89 204 194 22 22 Available-for-sale securities Tax loss carryforwards and tax credits Other Gross total Deferred tax after netting Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which losses can be utilized. At each balance sheet date, a new assessment is made of unrecognized deferred tax assets and of the carrying amount of deferred tax assets. A write-down of deferred tax assets was performed on tax loss carryforwards and tax credits amounting to EUR 105 million (2010: EUR 82 million) and on deductible temporary differences totaling EUR 28 million (2010: EUR 36 million), as direct use in the foreseeable future seems improbable. The change in the write-downs was recognized in the income statement. Out of the total amount of the write-downs amounting to EUR 133 million (2010: EUR 118 million), EUR 28 million (2010: EUR 36 million) can be carried forward without limitation and EUR 102 million (2010: EUR 82 million) can be carried forward for more than three years. EUR 3 million (2010: EUR 0 million) will lapse within the next three years. As of December 31, 2011, the BSH Group had unutilized tax loss carryforwards of EUR 171 million (2010: EUR 143 million) and tax credits of EUR 55 million (2010: EUR 55 million). The following table shows the utilization periods for the loss carryforwards: Utilization period of tax loss carryforwards (in EUR million) 2011 2010 Limited carryforward period, less than 3 years 10 2 Limited carryforward period, more than 3 years 159 137 Unlimited carryforward period Total 2 4 171 143 Loss carryforwards for which no deferred tax assets have been recognized amounted to EUR 147 million (2010: EUR 134 million). Utilization periods for tax credits (in EUR million) 2011 2010 Limited carryforward period, less than 3 years 3 22 Limited carryforward period, more than 3 years 52 33 Unlimited carryforward period Total 0 0 55 55 Tax credits for which no deferred tax assets have been recognized amounted to EUR 52 million (2010: EUR 51 million). 85 86 Net deferred tax liabilities of EUR 11 million (2010: EUR 11 million) were recognized for temporary differences in connection with investments in subsidiaries. These “outside basis differences” include for the most part the tax on possible dividend payments. Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 12.39, no deferred tax liabilities were recognized for temporary differences amounting to EUR 147 million in connection with investments in subsidiaries because the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is unlikely that these temporary differences will be reversed in the foreseeable future. 12 Non-controlling interests The profit attributable to the non-controlling interests amounting to EUR 1 million (2010: EUR 2 million) was generated by BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A. Ş., Istanbul, BSH Home Appliances Services Ltd., Jeddah, and Constructa-Neff Vertriebs-GmbH, Munich. BSW Household Appliances Co., Ltd., Wuxi also contributed to the net profit attributable to the non-controlling interests in 2010. 13 Other income statement disclosures The functional costs include the following personnel expenses: in EUR million Wages and salaries Social security contributions Expenses for pension plans and benefits Personnel expenses 2011 2010 1) 1,541 1,480 281 259 71 68 1,893 1,807 1) After adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations, which were previously fully contained within personnel expenses. For further information see Notes 2.2 and 9. The cost of materials totaled EUR 4,835 million (2010: EUR 4,345 million). The Group received government grants for research and development amounting to EUR 6 million (2010: EUR 3 million) and other grants amounting to EUR 2 million (2010: EUR 4 million), which were recognized directly in the income statement. The average number of employees in the year under review was as follows: 2011 2010 BSH GmbH – Direct employees 6,450 6,368 – Indirect employees 6,306 5,909 of which apprentices 329 331 1,806 1,699 Companies outside Germany 30,252 26,960 Total 44,814 40,936 2011 2010 Other companies in Germany 14 Cash and cash equivalents The breakdown of cash and cash equivalents is as follows: in EUR million Checks 15 6 7 8 Bank balances 489 561 Cash and cash equivalents 511 575 Cash in hand All items under cash and cash equivalents are due within three months calculated from the date of acquisition – as in 2010. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 15Securities In accordance with IAS 39, securities are classified as available for sale and recognized at fair value. 16 Trade accounts receivable in EUR million Trade accounts receivable (third parties) 2011 2010 2,362 1,851 Allowances on receivables – 103 – 116 Trade accounts receivable, net 2,259 1,735 Trade accounts receivable 2,362 1,851 – of which, as of the balance sheet date, neither written down nor overdue 2,028 1,468 of which, as of the balance sheet date, not written down but overdue as follows: 84 82 less than 1 month 60 42 between 1 month and 3 months 17 20 7 20 more than 3 months The changes in allowances on trade accounts receivable (loans and receivables category) were as follows: in EUR million Balance at 01.01. 2011 2010 116 117 – 2 4 – – Additions 33 24 Utilization 20 17 Reversals 24 12 103 116 Exchange rate differences Change in basis of consolidation Balance at 31.12. As regards trade accounts receivable that were neither written down nor in default, there were no indications as of the balance sheet date that the debtors were unable to meet their payment obligations. Additionally, a Group average of one third of trade accounts receivable are insured by the companies concerned. Furthermore, securities are available for some trade accounts receivable in the form of guarantees, land charges, mortgages and collateral securities. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of trade accounts receivable for which contractual conditions were being renegotiated stood at EUR 1 million (2010: EUR 1 million). Trade accounts receivable include an amount of EUR 0.1 million (2010: EUR 0.1 million) that is due for payment in more than one year. 87 88 17 Other current assets in EUR million 2011 2010 Other receivables (third parties) 206 262 Other receivables from non-consolidated affiliated companies Prepaid expenses Current derivative financial instruments (note 29) Other tax receivables and receivables from employees Allowances on other current assets 0 1 19 20 7 8 154 141 –7 – 5 379 427 in EUR million 2011 2010 Finished goods and merchandise 902 834 Total other current assets 18Inventories Work in process Raw materials, consumables and supplies 36 31 297 289 Spare parts 56 53 Advance payments 14 19 1,305 1,226 Total The write-down recognized in the year under review was EUR 104 million (2010: EUR 93 million). The spare parts item comprises components held in warehouses to cover a 10-year parts warranty on home appliances. As in 2010, no inventories were pledged as collateral. 19 Non-current financial assets Non-current financial assets included the following: in EUR million Financial assets Financial investments Other non-current assets Non-current financial assets 2011 2010 747 880 1 0 15 11 763 891 2011 2010 The following table shows the breakdown of other non-current assets: in EUR million Loans (third parties) 1 1 Non-current derivative financial instruments (note 29) 1 0 Miscellaneous non-current assets 13 10 Total other non-current assets 15 11 As in 2010, no impairment losses were recognized for loans and there were no overdue loans. 20 Property, plant and equipment The consolidated statement of changes in fixed assets (see Annex I) shows a breakdown of the property, plant, and equipment items aggregated on the face of the balance sheet, together with the changes in these items in the year under review. As a result of the economic situation, impairment losses amounting to EUR 11 million were recognized in the year under review (2010: EUR 14 million). These impairment losses related primarily to the subsidiaries in Greece and Peru (2010: only Peru). N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S As of the balance sheet date, obligations incurred in connection with the acquisition of property, plant, and equipment amounted to EUR 10 million (2010: EUR 2 million). As in 2010, there were no restraints on the utilization of property, plant, and equipment in the year under review. Government grants with a total value of EUR 2 million (2010: EUR 2 million) were deducted from new additions in the year under review; they include incentives for structurally weak regions in Germany. Borrowing costs of EUR 0.4 million for qualifying assets were capitalized for the first time. 21 Intangible assets Please refer to the statement of changes in fixed assets (Annex I) for information on changes in intangible assets. Additions under this item included the costs of purchased software, tool licenses, industrial and similar rights, brand names, customer bases, and similar assets. A material item included in intangible assets is goodwill of EUR 160 million (2010: EUR 185 million). EUR 134 million of this (2010: EUR 160 million) relates to the Group’s Turkish subsidiary. As in 2010, there were no additions to goodwill in the year under review. All goodwill items recognized in the consolidated balance sheet and assigned to cashgenerating units were tested for impairment. As in 2010, no impairment was recognized. As in 2010, there were no restraints on the utilization of intangible assets in the year under review. 22 Current and non-current financial liabilities Current and non-current financial liabilities comprise primarily of liabilities to banks and a bond issued in the year under review. The financial liabilities have the following remaining periods to repayment: in EUR million 2011 2010 Up to 1 year 471 288 1 – 5 years 459 236 More than 5 years 121 9 1,051 533 Total Financial liabilities due within one year are reported as current financial liabilities; financial liabilities due after one year are classified as non-current financial liabilities. 89 90 The following table shows the contractually agreed (undiscounted) interest and redemption payments for primary financial liabilities and the derivative financial instruments with negative fair value: in EUR million Other current liabilities Carrying amount 31.12.2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 > 2016 1,061 1,061 – – – – – Bond 244 8 8 112 5 97 53 Liabilities to banks 807 482 66 94 92 35 74 Other financial liabilities 104 105 0 – – – – 16 18 1 1 0 2 – Carrying amount 31.12.2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 > 2015 1,029 1,029 – – – – – Liabilities to banks 533 299 68 64 61 59 9 Other financial liabilities 176 176 0 0 – – – 7 6 1 – – – – Derivative financial instruments in EUR million Other current liabilities Derivative financial instruments In September 2011, BSH issued a bond with a total volume of CNY 2 billion on the offshore renminbi market in Hong Kong. The bond was split into the following tranches: Tranche Nominal value CNY million Nominal value EUR million 1) Due date for payments 1 850 97 29.09.2014 2 750 86 28.09.2016 400 46 28.09.2018 2,000 229 3 Total 1 ) translated at the transaction rate 23 Trade accounts payable Trade accounts payable are recognized at the higher of their nominal amount and settlement amount; all trade accounts payable are due within one year, as in 2010. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 24 Other liabilities and provisions (current) Current provisions and other current liabilities break down as follows: in EUR million 2011 2010 Provisions for tax 22 83 Other provisions 443 406 Current provisions 465 489 Notes payable 91 175 Advance payments received 74 52 555 483 Accrued liabilities Deferred income Other tax liabilities Current derivative financial instruments (note 29) Miscellaneous other liabilities Other current liabilities 3 2 83 67 15 6 240 244 1,061 1,029 The statement of changes in provisions (note 25) gives details of changes in current provisions. 25 Other liabilities and provisions (non-current) The following table shows the breakdown of other non-current liabilities and non-current provisions: in EUR million 2011 Non-current derivative financial instruments (note 29) 2010 1 1 Miscellaneous other liabilities 19 19 Other non-current liabilities 20 20 100 Provisions for tax 100 Other provisions 309 425 Non-current provisions 409 525 The following table shows the breakdown of other provisions, both current and non-current: in EUR million Tax provisions Provisions for personnel and employee benefit obligations Provisions in relation to sales Other provisions Total 1,014 183 158 391 282 Foreign currency translation –1 0 – 5 0 – 6 Utilization 39 42 181 82 344 Balance at 01.01.2011 Reversals 26 2 32 28 88 Additions 22 28 204 53 307 Interest cost (unwind of discount) 0 1 7 2 10 Reclassifications – 17 0 1 – 3 – 19 Balance at 31.12.2011 122 143 385 224 874 22 56 246 141 465 100 87 139 83 409 Current portion of provisions Non-current portion of provisions The reclassifications are shown under accrued liabilities (note 24). 91 92 Non-current provisions predominantly cover a period of up to five years. The provisions for personnel and employee benefit obligations include for the most part obligations related to semi-retirement, employee long-service awards, the collective pay agreement (ERA) adjustment fund, and performance-related arrangements. The sales-related provisions primarily comprise provisions for general and extended warranty obligations. Other provisions include provisions to cover obligations under guarantees, contractual agreements in Germany and abroad, environmental protection, and other risks. BSH has set up provisions for existing legal disputes on the scale deemed necessary at this time to cover claims that may arise. Although the Group essentially considers the claims made to be unjustified, liabilities over and above this also cannot be ruled out completely. Provisions set up in 2010 for sales risks have been partially released as a result of updated estimates. The Group reached agreements with the tax authorities in respect of value-added tax for global customer services and export transactions, as a result of which the provisions created to cover these risks have been utilized. Tax risks based on customer refunds were provided against to a significant extent in the year under review. 26 Provisions for pensions and other post-retirement benefits 26.1 Defined benefit plans As of December 31, 2011, the consolidation for the first time included pension obligations in an additional subsidiary in China. BSH has obligations under a Company pension plan for employees in Germany. This plan largely involves the payment of lump-sum/pension benefits and/or individual fixed amounts. For employees in other countries (Belgium, Great Britain, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland), the benefits mainly depend on the number of years of service and the salary received immediately prior to retirement. The post-retirement benefits granted in the other countries are lump-sum payments. The post-retirement benefits in Germany are mainly financed by the recognition of pension provisions; part of the obligation is funded through an employee trust. In other countries, they are mainly funded through insurers and pension funds. The commitment under defined benefit plans is measured annually using the projected unit credit method or approximations. In accordance with IAS 19.93A, the other comprehensive income rule is applied in determining pension provisions and the pension expense. Actuarial gains and losses are reported in OCI in the year in which they arise. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S The breakdown of pension obligation funding is as follows: Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 45 47 43 51 Present value of funded pension obligations 845 110 810 99 External plan assets – 69 – 92 – 77 – 83 Funding balance 821 65 776 67 in EUR million Present value of unfunded pension obligations Unrecognized past service cost – 0 – 0 Effect of asset limitation (IAS 19.58(b)) – – – 0 821 65 776 67 Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 58 Pension provisions The pension provisions changed as follows in the course of 2011: in EUR million Brought forward 776 67 716 Exchange rate differences – – 2 – 1 Transfer values 0 0 0 – Obligations transferred as a result of business combination – 0 – 0 – 41 – 11 – 40 – 14 – – 7 – 13 – 5 Reversal (–)/addition (+) 65 10 67 20 Amount recognized in OCI 21 8 46 7 821 65 776 67 Pension and lump-sum amounts paid by the Company Employer contributions to external funds Pension provisions Contributions in connection with deferred compensation in Germany are reported under service cost. In 2011, these contributions amounted to EUR 3 million (2010: EUR 3 million). The expense recognized in the income statement breaks down as follows: in EUR million Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2010 2011 2011 2010 Service cost 25 6 22 6 Interest expense 44 6 45 7 Expected return on external plan assets – 4 – 4 – 3 – 4 – Amortization of actuarial gains (–)/losses (+) – – – Amortization of past service cost – 1 3 5 Expense (+)/income (–) from curtailment and settlement – – – 6 – – – 0 65 9 67 20 Effect of asset limitation (IAS 19.58 (b)) Amount reported as expense (+)/income (–) 93 94 Service costs are recognized by function; the interest expense and expected return on external plan assets are shown within net finance income/cost. The reconciliation of benefit obligations and assets is as follows: in EUR million Present value of obligations at beginning of year Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 853 150 784 125 Service cost 25 6 22 6 Interest expense 44 6 45 7 Employee contributions Actuarial gain (–)/loss (+) – 1 – 1 15 6 44 9 – – – 7 – 16 Exchange rate effects –46 – 13 – 45 Past service cost Total amount of pensions and lump sums paid – 1 3 5 Transfer values 0 0 0 – Effect of curtailments and settlements Present value of obligations at end of year Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year – – – 6 891 157 853 150 77 83 68 67 4 4 3 4 – 6 – 2 – 2 2 Expected return on external plan assets Actuarial gain (+)/loss (–) Exchange rate effects – 2 – 5 Employer contributions to external pension funds – 7 13 5 Employee contributions to external pension funds Amounts of pension and lump sums paid by external funds – 1 – 1 – 6 – 3 – 5 – 1 Effects of plan settlement Fair value of plan assets at end of year – 0 – – 69 92 77 83 Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 The actual return on external plan assets was as follows: in EUR million 4 4 3 4 Actuarial gain (–)/loss (+) Expected return on external plan assets – 6 – 2 – 2 2 Actuarial return on external plan assets – 2 2 1 6 For 2012, contributions paid to external funds are expected to total around EUR 6 million and direct pension payments around EUR 43 million. The amounts reported in OCI are as follows: Germany Other countries Germany Other countries in EUR million 2011 2011 2010 2010 Actuarial gain (–)/loss (+) – 21 – 8 – 46 – 7 – – – 0 Total amount for the year recognized in OCI – 21 – 8 – 46 – 7 OCI – 38 – 24 – 17 – 15 6 2 13 2 10 6 4 4 – 28 – 18 – 13 – 11 Effect of asset limitation (IAS 19.58 [b]) Deferred tax on actuarial gains (+)/losses (–) Total recognized in equity Net actuarial gains (+)/losses (–) reported in equity N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S The actuarial gains and losses incurred are attributable to the following categories: in EUR million Difference between the expected and the actual return on external plan assets Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 – 6 – 2 – 2 2 6 – 1 – 1 3 Adjustment due to changes in measurement assumptions – 21 – 5 – 43 – 12 Total actuarial gain (+)/loss (–) – 21 – 8 – 46 – 7 Difference between expected and actual amounts The breakdown in prior reporting periods in accordance with IAS 19.120 A (p) was as follows: in EUR million Germany Other countries Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2007 2009 2009 2008 2008 2007 Present value of pension obligations 784 125 777 110 809 117 Fair value of plan assets at end of year – 68 – 67 – 67 – 57 – 66 – 65 Funding balance 716 58 710 53 743 52 – 1 2 – 3 – 10 0 0 4 0 –1 – 1 1 – 2 Difference between expected and actual return on plan assets Difference between expected and actual amounts The reported plan assets break down as follows: Values in % Equities and other securities Bonds Real estate Other assets Total Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2011 2011 2010 2010 4 38 12 42 43 38 42 36 4 10 6 10 49 14 40 12 100 100 100 100 The assumptions regarding the expected return on funds assets are made on the basis of a uniform method, which in turn is based on the actual long-term returns of the past, the portfolio structure and long-term returns expected in the future. The assumptions regarding the expected return on the funds assets essentially remained unchanged for the 2011 and 2010 financial years. The expected return on plan assets in Germany was assumed to be 5.0%. The expected return on external plan assets for companies outside Germany ranges between 3.5% and 8.0%. 39.2% (2010: 43.0%) of the plan assets reported for Germany were invested in the sponsors of the employee trust. These largely comprised pension trust (employee trust) receivables due from BSH-D. As of December 31, 2011, the receivables stood at EUR 25 million (2010: EUR 29 million). In addition, the German plan assets include real estate leased to BSH companies with a fair value of EUR 3 million (2010: EUR 4 million). 95 96 The calculation of the pension obligations and pension expense was based on the following assumptions: Values in % Germany Other countries Germany Other countries 2010 2011 2011 2010 Discount rate 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.7 Expected return on external plan assets 5.0 4.2 5.0 4.8 Salary inflation 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.9 Pension inflation 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.7 The measurement assumptions used for countries outside Germany are weighted averages. The expected long-term return on investment is determined on the basis of publicly available and internal capital market studies and forecasts. In Germany, the 2005 Heubeck tables were used as the biometric basis for the calculations. Employee turnover probabilities were estimated for specific age groups and genders. 26.2 Defined contribution plans In 2011, the Company made contributions of EUR 102 million (2010: EUR 98 million) to defined contribution plans (employer contributions to statutory pension insurance). 26.3 Partial retirement agreements and long-service bonus commitments In some countries, BSH also has employee benefit obligations in connection with the termination of employment contracts and the payment of long-service bonuses. The scope of these obligations amounted approximately to EUR 85 million at the end of 2011 (2010: EUR 92 million). 27Equity The consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity shows the changes in the BSH Group’s equity and its components. Retained earnings and reserves include the income earned in the past by the companies included in the consolidated financial statements, insofar as they have not been paid as dividends, and other recognized gains and losses. The development of retained earnings was due to dividend distributions to shareholders as well as to a reduced consolidated net profit compared with 2010. The executive management of BSH is proposing an appropriation of the unappropriated profit of BSH-D as at December 31, 2011 in the form of a dividend distribution of EUR 186.5 million in total. The differences resulting from the translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries outside Germany are reported under the currency translation reserve in OCI. The reserve for available-for-sale financial assets includes the measurement gains or losses on securities, net of deferred tax. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S The reserve for derivative financial instruments in connection with cash flow hedges includes the measurement gains of losses on derivatives, net of deferred tax, to the extent that these relate to the effective portion of the hedging relationship. In accordance with IAS 19, the actuarial gains/losses item comprises actuarial gains/losses on pension provisions (net of deferred tax) recognized directly in equity. The paid-in capital and the net profit for the year generated by the sales companies whose shares are held by Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens AG, are shown in the balance sheet under ‘Non-controlling shareholders’. This item also includes the minority interest in the equity of BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A. Ş., Istanbul, BSH Home Appliances Services Ltd., Jeddah, and Constructa-Neff Vertriebs-GmbH, Munich, including the proportion of profit or loss attributable the minority shareholders. In 2010, the item ‘Non-controlling shareholders’ also included BSW Household Appliances Co., Ltd., Wuxi. BSH is not subject to any statutory requirements on minimum capital adequacy. As part of its normal business activities, the Group maintains a reasonable equity ratio. BSH uses the concept of economic value added as a basis for managing the business. The objective of capital management is to maintain the Group’s external long-term rating, which, as in 2010, Standard and Poor­’s rated “A” with stable outlook. 28 Notes to the statement of cash flow The statement of cash flow reports how the BSH Group’s cash and cash equivalents changed in the course of the year under review as a result of cash inflows and outflows. In accordance with IAS 7 “Statement of Cash Flows”, a distinction is made between cash flows from operating, investment, and financing activities. The statement of cash flow is determined using the indirect method starting from the net income. The cash flows from operating activities are determined after applying adjustments for non-cash income and expenses, primarily depreciation and amortization, and after taking into account any changes in working capital. Investment activity comprises additions under non-current assets and the purchase or sale of securities. Cash flows from financing activities show cash inflows and outflows from the drawdown or repayment of financial liabilities and from dividends. The cash and cash equivalents reported in the statement of cash flow comprise cash on hand, checks, and bank balances, providing they are available within three months. The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and the effect of changes in the consolidated group are reported separately. The changes in the balance sheet items reported in the statement of cash flow cannot be directly reconciled to the balance sheet statement because they have been adjusted for exchange rate effects. The exception to this is the figure for cash and cash equivalents. 29 Financial instruments In the BSH Group, financial instruments are generally classified as “loans and receivables” or as “available for sale”. The non-derivative financial liabilities are assigned to other financial liabilities. Derivative financial instruments are used to hedge future cash flows. Derivative financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting are classified as “held for trading”. Regular way purchases or sales of financial instruments are accounted for on the settlement date. 97 98 Net gains/losses by category in EUR million Loans and receivables Available-for-sale financial assets Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss Financial liabilities carried at amortized cost 2011 2010 70 20 0 18 – 8 – 44 – 156 – 5 The net gains/losses from the loans and receivables category include changes in write-downs, gains and losses on derecognition and payments received, exchange rate gains and losses, and the reversal of impairment losses or of gains/losses on derecognized loans and receivables. Net gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale financial assets comprise gains and losses on the derecognition of available-for-sale financial assets and interest income from these financial instruments. See the consolidated statement of changes in equity for disclosures on the amount of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale financial assets recognized in OCI during the financial year, and the amount reclassified from OCI and recognized as income in the year. Net gains or losses on financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include not only the effects of changes in fair value, but also interest expense or income from these financial instruments. The net expense from financial liabilities measured at amortized cost is made up of interest expenses and currency gains and losses. The information required under IFRS 7.20 (b) is shown in Note 9 “Finance income and finance expense”. Information on impairment losses, as required by IFRS 7.20 (e), is contained, where necessary, in the explanatory notes on items within the balance sheet and income statement. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Carrying amounts and fair values by category in EUR million 31.12.2011 Measurement categories IAS 39 Carrying amount 31.12.2010 Fair value Carrying amount Fair value ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents n.a.1) 511 511 575 575 Trade accounts receivable LaR 2,259 2,259 1,735 1,735 Other financial receivables LaR 141 141 254 255 Available-for-sale financial assets AfS 799 799 894 894 FAHfT 7 7 5 5 n.a.1) 1 1 3 3 FVTPL 18 18 6 6 Derivative financial assets not qualifying for hedge accounting Derivative financial assets (hedge accounting) Financial assets with embedded derivatives LIABILITIES Trade accounts payable FLAC 1,100 1,100 1,020 1,020 Bonds FLAC 244 235 0 0 Liabilities to banks FLAC 807 869 533 599 Other financial liabilities FLAC 303 303 398 398 Finance lease liabilities n.a.1) 1 1 1 1 Derivative financial liabilities not qualifying for hedge accounting FLHfT 12 12 5 5 Derivative financial liabilities (hedge accounting) n.a.1) 4 4 2 2 Loans and receivables LaR 2,400 2,400 1,989 1,990 Available-for-sale financial assets AfS 799 799 894 894 FAHfT 7 7 5 5 2,017 Of which aggregated by measurement category Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss FLAC 2,454 2,507 1,951 Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss Financial liabilities carried at amortized cost FLHfT 12 12 5 5 Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss FVTPL 18 18 6 6 298 298 212 212 773 773 655 655 Reconciliation to balance sheet – Other non-financial receivables (included in other current assets, securities and non-current financial assets) – Other non-financial liabilities (included in other current and non-current liabilities) LaR AfS FAHfT FLAC FLHfT FVTPL 1 Loans and receivables Available-for-sale financial assets Financial assets held for trading Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost Financial liabilities held for trading Fair value through profit or loss ) n.a. not applicable 99 100 Financial instruments measured at fair value on the balance sheet The following overview shows the allocation of our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value to the three levels of the fair value hierarchy: Level 1: Measurement using market prices observable in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Measurement of assets or liabilities using prices for similar financial instruments that do not fall under level 1. In this case, fair value can be determined either directly (e.g. prices) or indirectly (e.g. derivation of prices). Level 3: This category covers all financial instruments that cannot be classified under level 1 or level 2 because no reliable market prices are available. In this case, special valuation techniques must be used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities. in EUR million 31.12.2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Financial assets measured at fair value – 26 – 26 Available-for-sale financial assets Derivative financial assets 799 – – 799 Total 799 26 – 825 Financial liabilities measured at fair value Derivative financial liabilities – 16 – 16 Total – 16 – 16 in EUR million 31.12.2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Financial assets measured at fair value Derivative financial assets – 14 – 14 Available-for-sale financial assets 894 – – 894 Total 894 14 – 908 Financial liabilities measured at fair value Derivative financial liabilities – 7 – 7 Total – 7 – 7 There were no reclassifications between level 1 and level 2 in the year under review. 29.1 Non-derivative financial instruments Available-for-sale financial instruments Available-for-sale financial instruments are always reported at fair value. The fair value is generally the market value. If there is no active market, fair value is determined using a generally accepted valuation technique. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries and associates Shares in non-consolidated subsidiaries and associates are always reported at cost; impairment losses are recognized where appropriate. There is no active market for these companies and fair value cannot therefore be reliably determined with reasonable time and effort. Loans/receivables and financial liabilities Loans/receivables and financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, provided they are not related to hedges. In particular, these are: – Trade receivables and trade payables – Liabilities to banks – Bonds – Other financial assets and liabilities The amortized cost is calculated as the amount at which a financial asset or a financial liability was measured on initial recognition, less any repayments, impairment losses, or uncollectibility write-downs, and net of the premium/discount. The premium/discount is allocated using the effective interest rate method over the life of the financial asset or liability. For current receivables and liabilities, amortized cost equals the principal amount or the settlement amount respectively. Because of the Company’s customer structure, there is no substantial concentration of payment default risk in reported receivables, nor is disclosure required. 29.2 Derivative financial instruments Hedging policy and financial derivatives The activities of BSH are also impacted by exchange rate fluctuations. It is the aim of the Company’s business policies to limit these risks with hedging measures. Hedging transactions are entered into exclusively with first-rate national and international banks. A limit is imposed on transactions with each contract partner. Binding internal rules and guidelines provide firm guidance on permitted actions and responsibilities for hedging, especially the hedging relationship with operating business and financial investment or financing transactions. BSH does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. The Group employs the treasury control and value contribution monitor used in the finance unit to control interest rate and currency management activities. These information systems are used to support the identification and assessment of interest rate and currency risks throughout the Group for the next twelve months, based on planned cash flow. These activities are subject to compliance with the minimum hedging rates stipulated in the Company’s financial guidelines, and take into account the strategy laid down by the Treasury Committee, which meets regularly under the chairmanship of a member of executive management. If cash flow hedge accounting is applied, changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are reported in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income. If cash flow hedge accounting cannot be applied, the changes in fair value are recognized in the income statement. 101 102 Currency risk As a basis for controlling its exposure to currency risks, BSH primarily uses a Group-wide cash flow reporting system, differentiated by currency; the subsidiaries outside Germany prepare rolling monthly reports for headquarters. Most of the hedging instruments used are forward exchange contracts; options are used in some cases. To monitor the risks from financial derivatives, hedges are marked to market on each bank working day; this valuation, plus additional information such as exchange rate gains or losses and risks, is available to the employees concerned and to the relevant managers. The nominal volumes of the reported derivatives represent the total of purchase and selling amounts on which the hedges are based. Nominal volumes in EUR million 2011 Maturity Fair value 2010 2011 2010 – 6 5 1 – 1 0 – 3 – 0 0 – 99 – 1 3 408 2 200 – 11 4 24 46 – 24 0 1 74 – 26 – 1 0 0 – 12 – 0 0 120 6 80 – 4 2 up to 1 year 1 – 5 years up to 1 year 1 – 5 years 234 18 227 Other interest rate derivatives 24 – Share-based derivatives and options 34 13 Derivatives with positive fair values – Foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting Currency forwards – Interest rate and other derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting – Foreign currency derivatives, hedge accounting Currency forwards Derivatives with negative fair values – Foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting Currency forwards Other foreign currency derivatives – Interest rate and other derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting Other interest rate derivatives Share-based derivatives and options – Foreign currency derivatives, hedge accounting Currency forwards The fair values disclosed in the above list were determined on the basis of information available on the balance sheet date. They represent the settlement amounts (redemption values) of the financial derivatives. Redemption values are calculated on the basis of quoted prices and standardized procedures. The maximum credit risk from derivative financial instruments is limited to the total positive fair values in the event of default by a contract partner of BSH-D or BSH Group companies. Changes in the fair value of financial instruments from the hedging of planned transactions and available-for-sale financial instruments are recognized in OCI under other recognized gains and losses. As of December 31, 2011, EUR 20 million (2010: EUR 43 million) was included in OCI after the deduction of deferred taxes. The effect of the cash flow hedges was to decrease equity by EUR 2 million (2010: increase of EUR 1 million). In the course of the year under review, BSH sold currency derivatives subject to hedge accounting. This resulted in the recognition of a net income amount of EUR 4 million (2010: loss of EUR 3 million) under other operating income/ expense. As in 2010, no gains or losses were recognized from the remeasurement of ineffective cash flow hedges for 2011. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Fluctuations in market prices can create significant risks for the BSH Group. Changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and share prices affect worldwide operating business, as well as investment and financing activities. To represent these risks, IFRS calls for sensitivity analyses which indicate the effects of hypothetical changes in relevant risk variables on profit or loss and equity. The effects on the period concerned are determined by relating the hypothetical changes in the risk variables to the portfolio of financial instruments as of the reporting date. This assumes that the portfolio as of the reporting date is representative of the full year. BSH has implemented a system based on the sensitivity analysis, made up of various risk analysis and risk management methods. The sensitivity analysis approximately quantifies the risk that can occur subject to the given assumptions if particular parameters are changed to a defined extent. The risk assessment here assumes: – a parallel 10% decrease/increase in the exchange rate of the Russian ruble against the euro – a parallel 10% decrease/increase in the exchange rate of the Pound sterling against the euro – a parallel 10% decrease/increase in the exchange rate of the Turkish lira against the euro – a parallel 10% decrease/increase in the exchange rate of the Chinese renminbi against the euro – a parallel shift in the yield curves for all currencies by 100 basis points (1 percentage point) – a 10% rise or fall in the prices of all listed investments classified as available-for-sale financial assets The potential economic effects of this analysis represent estimates. They are based on the assumption that the market changes implied within the framework of the sensitivity analysis will materialize. As a result of the global market trends that occur in reality, the actual effects on the consolidated income statement can differ significantly from these estimates. More than half of BSH’s subsidiaries are located outside the eurozone. As the Group’s reporting currency is the euro, the company translates the financial statements of these companies into euros. In order to address translation-related currency effects in risk management, BSH applies the assumption that investments in foreign companies are in all cases long term in nature, and the returns are continuously reinvested. Translation-related effects resulting from changes in the value of net assets translated into euros caused by exchange rate fluctuations are recognized in OCI in the BSH consolidated financial statements; they are not included in the sensitivity analysis. 103 104 Foreign currency risks (revaluation) RUB + 10% in EUR million 31.12.2011 RUB – 10% 31.12.2010 31.12.2011 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Cash and cash equivalents 1) 0 – 0 Trade accounts receivable 2) 11 – 0 Other assets FVTPL 3) 14 – – 10 31.12.2010 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity – 0 – 0 – – – 11 – 0 – 8 – – 14 – – 8 – – – 6 – 10 – 6 – 15 0 2 0 – 15 0 – 2 0 Financial assets Derivatives FVTPL 4) Effect on financial assets before tax Financial liabilities Derivatives FVTPL 4) – 6 – – 2 – 6 – 2 – Trade accounts payable 5) 2 – 3 – – 2 – – 3 – Financial liabilities 6) 0 – 1 – 0 – – 1 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax – 4 0 2 0 4 0 – 2 0 Total effect before tax 11 0 4 0 – 11 0 – 4 0 Foreign currency risks (revaluation) GBP + 10% in EUR million 31.12.2011 GBP – 10% 31.12.2010 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Cash and cash equivalents 1) 1 – 0 – – 1 – 0 – Trade accounts receivable 2) 0 – 0 – 0 – 0 – Other assets FVTPL 3) 0 – 0 – 0 – 0 – Derivatives FVTPL 4) 0 – – – 0 – – – Derivatives CFH 0 – – – 7 0 – – 7 1 0 0 – 7 – 1 0 0 7 – Financial assets 7) Effect on financial assets before tax Financial liabilities Derivatives FVTPL 4) – 2 – 5 – 2 – – 5 Derivatives CFH 7) – – 10 – – 8 – 10 – 8 Trade accounts payable 5) 0 – 6 – 0 – – 6 – Financial liabilities 6) 0 – – 6 – 0 – 6 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax –2 – 10 5 – 8 2 10 – 5 8 Total effect before tax – 1 – 10 5 – 15 1 10 – 5 15 N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Foreign currency risks (revaluation) TRY + 10% in EUR million 31.12.2011 TRY – 10% 31.12.2010 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents 1) Trade accounts receivable 2) Other assets FVTPL 3) Derivatives FVTPL 4) Effect on financial assets before tax 0 – 0 – 0 – 0 – – 6 – – 6 – 6 – 6 – 9 – 3 – – 9 – – 3 – – 7 – – 5 – 7 – 5 – – 4 0 – 8 0 4 0 8 0 Financial liabilities Derivatives FVTPL 4) – 2 – 2 – 2 – – 2 – Trade accounts payable 5) 6 – 5 – – 6 – – 5 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax 4 0 7 0 – 4 0 – 7 0 Total effect before tax 0 0 – 1 0 0 0 1 0 105 106 Foreign currency risks (revaluation) 8) in EUR million CNY + 10% CNY – 10% 31.12.2011 31.12.2011 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Cash and cash equivalents 1) – 2 – 2 – Trade accounts receivable 2) – 2 – 2 – Other assets FVTPL ) Financial assets 32 – – 32 – Derivatives FVTPL 4) – – – – Derivatives CFH 7) – – – – 28 0 – 28 0 – 8 – 8 – – – – – 3 Effect on financial assets before tax Financial liabilities Derivatives FVTPL 4) Derivatives CFH 7) Trade accounts payable 1 – – 1 – Financial liabilities 6) – 24 – 24 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax – 31 0 31 0 – 3 0 3 0 5) Total effect before tax AfS FVTPL CFH Available-for-sale financial assets Fair value through profit or loss Cash flow hedge Explanatory notes: 1 ) Cash and cash equivalents comprises checks, cash on hand, and bank credit balances. The currency risk relates to remeasurement. 2 ), 5) Trade accounts receivable and payable relate to both external and intercompany receivables and payables subject to remeasurement risk. 3 ) Other assets relate in particular to intercompany loan receivables and cash pool amounts subject to remeasurement risk as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. 4 6 7 ) Financial liabilities include both external borrowings and intercompany loan liabilities. The currency risk relates to remeasurement. ) Derivative instruments with hedge accounting (cash flow hedges) only include currency forwards. For the effective portion, the effect of exchange rate changes is thus recognized in OCI. 8 ) Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting include currency forwards, currency options, stock index futures, currency swaps, and interest rate index futures. Any effect of the scenarios in question is recognized in the income statement. ) It was decided not to show the sensitivity of the Chinese renminbi (CNY) for the prior year, due to the substantially lower business volumes compared with 2011. N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Interest rate risk In order to determine interest rate risk, BSH simulates a flat-rate 1% increase or cut in interest rates. The changes in interest expense or income thus derive from the nominal volumes concerned. Changes in the fair values of fixed-income securities and derivatives that react to interest rates are determined by calculating the basis point value (1% = 100 BP). Interest rate risk + 1% in EUR million 31.12.2011 Effect on income – 1% 31.12.2010 Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income 31.12.2011 Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income 31.12.2010 Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents 1) 5 – 6 – – 5 – – 6 – Financial assets AfS 2) – – 14 – – 16 – 14 – 16 Derivatives FVTPL 3) 2 – 0 – –2 – 0 – Effect on financial assets before tax 7 – 14 6 – 16 – 7 14 – 6 16 Derivatives FVTPL 3) 0 – 2 – 0 – – 2 – Financial liabilities 4) –1 – – 1 – 1 – 1 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax – 1 0 1 0 1 0 – 1 0 6 –14 7 – 16 –6 14 – 7 16 Financial liabilities Total effect before tax AfS FVTPL Available-for-sale financial assets Fair value through profit or loss Explanatory notes: 1 ) Cash and cash equivalents comprises checks, cash on hand, and bank credit balances. A change in interest rates would result in increased/ reduced interest income based on the demand and fixed-term deposits and accounts with interest-bearing balances as of the reporting date. 2 3 4 ) AfS financial assets specifically comprise securities. In the case of interest-bearing securities, a change in interest rates brings about a change in market values, which is reflected in the revaluation reserve. Mutual funds in bonds and money market funds are not included. Stock funds and mutual funds in stocks are in particular subject to other price risk, which is always recognized in the revaluation surplus. The simulation is conducted through the income statement only if impairments have already been recognized through profit or loss. ) Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting include currency forwards, currency options, stock index futures, currency swaps, and interest rate index futures. Any effect of the scenarios in question is recognized in the income statement. ) Financial liabilities include external borrowings. A change in interest rates would result in increased/reduced interest expense based on the variable-interest liabilities as of the reporting date. 107 108 Commodity price risks Group-wide hedging is required to counter the substantial fluctuations in commodity prices and the resulting risks to earnings. In so far as is possible, the hedging is performed via contractual agreements with suppliers. Unlike in 2010, the Group did not use any derivative financial instruments to hedge against medium to long-term commodity price risks, but instead used exchange traded commodities. Other price risks To determine other price risks, BSH simulates a 10% flat-rate increase or reduction in stock prices, with the result that stock prices or the corresponding stock price indices (relative to the mutual funds invested in stock funds or relative to the index futures concerned) are shown as being 10% higher or lower. Other price risks + 10% shares in EUR million 31.12.2011 – 10% shares 31.12.2010 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity Effect on income Effect on other trans­ actions in equity 1 16 0 11 – 3 – 14 – 1 – 11 – 4 – 0 – 4 – 0 – – 3 16 0 11 1 – 14 – 1 – 11 Derivatives FVTPL 2) 0 – 1 – 0 – – 1 – Effect on financial liabilities before tax 0 0 1 0 0 0 – 1 0 –3 16 1 11 1 – 14 – 2 – 11 Financial assets Financial assets AfS 1) Derivatives FVTPL 2) Effect on financial assets before tax Financial liabilities Total effect before tax AfS FVTPL Available-for-sale financial assets Fair value through profit or loss Explanatory notes: ) AfS financial assets specifically comprise securities. In the case of interest-bearing securities, a change in interest rates brings about a change in market values, which is reflected in the revaluation reserve. Mutual funds in bonds and money market funds are not included. Stock funds and mutual funds in stocks are in particular subject to other price risk, which is always recognized in the revaluation surplus. The simulation is conducted through the income statement only if impairments have already been recognized through profit or loss. 1 ) Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting include currency forwards, currency options, stock index futures, currency swaps, and interest rate index futures. Any effect of the scenarios in question is recognized in the income statement. 2 N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Credit and liquidity risk The liquidity risk for the company consists in its possibly being unable to meet its financial liabilities, for example the repayment of financial liabilities and the payment of purchase commitments. BSH limits this risk by means of effective central cash management, global access to lines of credit provided by prime-rated banks, and a syndicated credit line primarily entered into for contingencies. A significant portion of the external bank loans has been taken out over the long term, thus obviating short-term liquidity risks from repayment obligations. To supplement the above-mentioned liquidity management tools, BSH continuously pursues funding opportunities presented by the financial markets. In addition, the Group monitors trends in the availability and cost of funding. A major objective is to secure BSH’s financial flexibility and to limit unreasonable refinancing risks. No defaults in connection with financial investments subject to credit risk had been identified as of the reporting date. The maximum credit risk is represented by the carrying amounts of financial assets reported on the face of the balance sheet. Disclosures under IFRS 7.13 As at December 31, 2011, the Group had submitted to banks notes receivable for discounting, for which no deed of release had been obtained from the banks as of the reporting date. These bills receivable were not derecognized, but were shown in the amount of EUR 92 million in trade accounts receivable and current financial liabilities. 30Leases The breakdown of future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable leases is as follows: Due date for payments: Less than 1 year 2011 2010 80 72 1 – 5 years 180 164 More than five years 103 71 Total 363 307 The minimum lease payments relate primarily to rents paid for real estate. Under rental agreements and leases, minimum lease payments of EUR 85 million (2010: EUR 90 million) and sublease payments of EUR 5 million (2010: EUR 5 million) were recognized in the income statement in 2011. The part of a property that the pension trust (employee trust) of BSH-D had sold to an investor in 2007 was leased back in part in 2008 by the investor to a BSH Group company for a period of ten years, with an option to extend twice by a period of five years. The remainder of the real estate still owned by the employee trust has been leased to BSH companies on the basis of longer-term leases. 109 110 31 Contingent liabilities and other financial commitments No provisions have been set up for the following contingent liabilities and other financial commitments, recognized at their nominal values, because it is not deemed probable that the risk will occur. in EUR million 2011 2010 Guarantees and letters of comfort 2 2 Liabilities on notes 2 2 Other contingent liabilities 1 1 Total 5 5 32 Related party disclosures The following companies or persons are related parties for BSH-D under IAS 24: – Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany – Siemens AG, Munich and Berlin, Germany – Companies directly or indirectly controlled by BSH-D – Other consolidated and non-consolidated affiliated companies of the Robert Bosch Group and the Siemens Group – Members of the executive management or the Supervisory Board –Members of the executive management, the Board of Management or the Supervisory Board of Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens AG –Companies in which Robert Bosch GmbH, Siemens AG, or members of management hold a significant portion of the voting rights Transactions with these related parties are conducted on an arm’s length basis. The goods and services bought from related parties include primarily production supplies and sales services, and a small volume of training and other services. The goods and services supplied to related parties primarily involve the sale of home appliances. Most of these transactions are conducted by the companies in Germany. in EUR million 2011 Robert Bosch Group 2010 Siemens Group Robert Bosch Group Siemens Group Receivables 0 0 0 0 Liabilities 1 5 2 6 Revenue 2 8 2 0 N OT E S T O T H E B A L A N C E S H E E T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 33 Remuneration of members of the executive management and the Supervisory Board The remuneration paid to the Supervisory Board amounted to EUR 0.1 million (2010: EUR 0.1 million); executive management remuneration amounted to EUR 3.4 million (2010: EUR 3.8 million). Former members of executive management and their surviving dependents received payments of EUR 1.6 million, including pensions and transitional payments (2010: EUR 1.7 million). As of December 31, 2011, provisions amounting to EUR 21.0 million (2010: 20.7 million) were recognized for pensions and benefit entitlements for these persons. In the financial year, as in the previous year, there were no loans to members of the executive management or the Supervisory Board. The members of the executive management and the Supervisory Board are listed in the annexes. 34 Auditor fees and services in accordance with section 314 HGB Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Munich, was paid the following fees for services performed during the year under review: in EUR million 2011 2010 a) Financial statements auditing services 0.4 0.4 b) Other attestation services 0.7 0.9 c) Tax consultancy services 0.0 0.0 d) Other services 0.3 0.5 Total 1.4 1.8 Item a) comprises the fees for the statutory audits of annual financial statements for the German companies and the audit of the consolidated financial statements of BSH for the year ended December 31, 2011. Item b) comprises for the most part the fees for the auditor’s review of interim financial statements for the periods ending June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011 as well as attestation services in connection with the review of IT systems and the provision of a comfort letter. Item c) comprises a very small number of tax consultancy services. Item d) comprises for the most part project support services for IT license management processes. In 2010, this mainly comprised services for due diligence as part of selling and buying processes. Munich, March 28, 2012 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Executive Management 111 112 Annex I Consolidated Statement of Changes in Fixed Assets January 1 to December 31, 2011 Acquisition and manufacturing costs in EUR million I. Property, plant and equipment Note 01.01.2011 Foreign currency movements Additions Disposals Reclassification 31.12.2011 20 Land and buildings 855 – 7 28 9 17 884 Technical equipment and machinery 1,572 – 21 67 50 66 1,634 Other equipment, operating and office equipment 1,387 – 13 120 66 47 1,475 132 – 1 157 0 – 88 200 Assets under construction Advance payments on property, plant and equipment II. Intangible assets 77 – 1 64 5 – 42 93 4,023 – 43 436 130 0 4,286 21 Purchased intangible assets Patents, licenses, brand names, customer bases, etc. (excl. software) 71 2 0 0 0 73 Software 80 0 9 2 – 1 86 Goodwill 191 – 25 0 0 0 166 0 0 7 0 0 7 342 – 23 16 2 – 1 332 Advance payments on intangible assets Internally generated intangible assets Patents, licenses, etc. (excl. software) 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 1 0 1 45 Development expenditure 3 0 0 0 3 6 Intangible assets being created 6 0 0 0 – 3 3 Software 1 52 0 1 0 1 54 4,417 – 66 453 132 0 4,672 ) Included are impairment losses on property, plant and equipment of EUR 11 million. CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F C H A N G E S I N F I X E D A SS E T S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Depreciation and amortization 01.01.2011 Foreign currency movements Current year 1) Disposals Carrying amounts 31.12.2011 Reclassification Reversals 31.12.2011 397 – 2 37 7 0 0 425 459 1,085 – 14 107 47 0 0 1,131 503 1,001 – 8 136 59 0 0 1,070 405 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 2,487 – 24 281 113 0 0 2,631 1,655 31 36 3 3 0 0 0 42 66 0 7 2 – 1 0 70 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 108 3 10 2 – 1 0 118 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 4 0 1 0 27 18 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 25 0 5 0 1 0 31 23 2,620 – 21 296 115 0 0 2,780 1,892 113 114 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Fixed Assets January 1 to December 31, 2010 Acquisition and manufacturing costs in EUR million I. Property, plant and equipment Note 01.01.2010 Foreign currency movements Additions Disposals Reclassification 31.12.2010 20 Land and buildings 800 23 28 9 13 855 Technical equipment and machinery 1,488 38 72 117 91 1,572 Other equipment, operating and office equipment 1,370 25 100 136 28 1,387 95 1 123 0 – 87 132 Assets under construction Advance payments on property, plant and equipment II. Intangible assets 52 2 68 0 –45 77 3,805 89 391 262 0 4,023 21 Purchased intangible assets Patents, licenses, brand names, customer bases, etc. (excl. software) 69 1) 2 0 0 0 71 Software 76 1 6 3 0 80 Goodwill 181 1) 10 0 0 0 191 Advance payments on intangible assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 13 6 3 0 342 43 Internally generated intangible assets 36 0 3 0 4 Development expenditure Software 3 0 0 0 0 3 Intangible assets being created 7 0 3 0 – 4 6 46 0 6 0 0 52 4,177 102 403 265 0 4,417 1 ) Reclassification of a brand name amounting to EUR 17 million from goodwill as patents, licenses, brand names, customer bases, etc. (excl. software). 2 3 ) Reclassification of a brand name amounting to EUR 5 million from goodwill as patents, licenses, brand names, customer bases, etc. (excl. software). ) Including impairment losses on property, plant and equipment of EUR 14 million. CO NS O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T O F C H A N G E S I N F I X E D A SS E T S | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S Depreciation and amortization 01.01.2010 Foreign currency movements Current year 3) Carrying amount 31.12.2010 Disposals Reclassification Reversals 31.12.2010 361 8 33 6 1 0 397 458 1,064 22 105 115 9 0 1,085 487 983 15 141 129 – 9 0 1,001 386 2 0 4 0 – 1 1 4 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 2,410 45 283 250 0 1 2,487 1,536 35 2) 0 3 0 0 2 36 35 61 1 7 3 0 0 66 14 4 2) 2 0 0 0 0 6 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 3 10 3 0 2 108 234 18 0 4 0 0 0 22 21 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 5 0 0 0 25 27 2,530 48 298 253 0 3 2,620 1,797 115 116 Annex II Shareholdings of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH as of December 31, 2011 Shareholding (%) Shareholding (%) Companies included in the consolidated financial statements as specified by IAS 27.12 South America BSH Electrodomésticos S.A.C., Callao-Lima 100 Germany Briky S.A., Montevideo 100 Constructa-Neff Vertriebs-GmbH, Munich 50 Asia/Oceania Neff GmbH, Munich 100 BSH Hausgeräte Service GmbH, Munich 100 BSH Home Appliances Holding (China) Co., Ltd., Nanjing 100 BSH Hausgerätewerk Nauen GmbH, Nauen 100 BSH Home Appliances Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 100 BSH Hausgeräte Service Nauen GmbH, Nauen 100 Gaggenau Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich 100 BSH Home Appliances Service Jiangsu Co., Ltd., Nanjing 100 100 BSH Home Appliances (China) Co., Ltd., Nanjing 100 100 BSH Electrical Appliances (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd., Nanjing 100 BSH Home Appliances S.A., Brussels 100 BSH Electrical Appliances (Anhui) Co., Ltd., Chuzhou 100 BSH Hvidevarer A/S, Ballerup 100 BSW Household Appliances Co., Ltd., Wuxi 100 BSH Kodinkoneet Oy, Helsinki 100 BSH Home Appliances Ltd., Hong Kong 100 BSH Electroménager S.A.S., Saint Ouen 100 BSH Home Appliances Limited, Yongin-City 100 Gaggenau Industrie S.A.S., Lipsheim 100 BSH Home Appliances Ltd., Tel Aviv 100 BSH Ikiakes Syskeves A.B.E., Athens 100 BSH Home Appliances Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur 100 BSH Home Appliances Limited, Milton Keynes 100 BSH Home Appliances Pte. Ltd., Singapore 100 BSH Elettrodomestici S.p.A., Milan 100 BSH Huishoudapparaten B.V., Amsterdam 100 BSH Home Appliances Pty. Ltd., Heatherton, Victoria 100 BSH Electroménagers S.A., Luxembourg 100 BSH Home Appliances Ltd., Auckland 100 BSH Husholdningsapparater A/S, Oslo 100 BSH Home Appliances Ltd., Bangkok 100 BSH Hausgeräte Gesellschaft mbH, Vienna 100 BSH Home Appliances Holding GmbH, Vienna 100 BSH Home Appliances Manufacturing Ltd., Kabinburi 100 100 BSH Home Appliances FZE, Dubai 100 BSH Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH, Munich BSH Hausgeräte Vertriebs GmbH, Munich Europe BSH Finance Management GmbH, Vienna BSH Home Appliances Saudi Arabia LLC, Jeddah 51 BSH Sprzet Gospodarstwa Domowego Sp.z o.o., Warsaw 100 BSH Home Appliances Private Limited, Mumbai 100 BSHP Electrodomésticos, S.U., Lda., Carnaxide 100 BSH Electrocasnice S.R.L., Bucharest 100 BSH Household Appliances Manufacturing Private Limited, Mumbai 100 OOO BSH Bytowaja Technika, Moscow 100 Africa OOO BSH Bytovye Pribory, St. Petersburg 100 BSH Electroménagers (SA), Casablanca 100 BSH Home Appliances AB, Stockholm 100 BSH Home Appliances (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg 100 BSH Hausgeräte AG, Geroldswil 100 BSH Drives and Pumps s.r.o., Michalovce 100 Companies included in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IAS 27.13 (b) BSH Hišni Aparati d.o.o., Nazarje 100 Robert Bosch Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich – BSH Electrodomésticos España, S.A., Huarte 100 Siemens-Electrogeräte GmbH, Munich – BSH domácí spotřebiče s.r.o., Prague 100 CONSTRUCTA GmbH, Munich – BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., Istanbul 99.28 TOV BSH Pobutova Technika, Kiev 100 Companies not included in the consolidated financial statements as specified by IAS 27.13 BSH Háztartási Készülék Kereskedelmi Kft., Budapest 100 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte Altersfürsorge GmbH, Munich BSH Home Appliances Ltd./Électroménagers BSH Ltée, Mississauga BSH Electrodomésticos S.A. de C.V., Mexico City BSH Home Appliance Corporation, Huntington Beach/New Bern 100 Companies not included in the consolidated financial statements due to immateriality: North America 100 100 100 South America BSH Electrodomésticos S.A., Buenos Aires 100 BSH Participações Ltda., São Paulo 100 BSH I.D. Invalidska družba d.o.o., Nazarje 100 BSH Home Appliances Sarl, Tunis 100 BSH kucanski uredaji d.o.o. za usluge, Zagreb 100 BSH KUCNI APARATI d.o.o. Beograd, Beograd 100 BSH Domakinski Uredi Bulgaria EOOD, Sofia 100 Plus one subsidiary without business operations Profilo Elektrogeräte-Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH, Munich 100 2 I N D E P E N D E N T A U D I T O R S ’ R E P O R T | N OT E S T O T H E CO NS O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S | Contents | Independent Auditors’ Report We have audited the consolidated financial statements prepared by BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich, comprising the balance sheet, the income statement and statement of comprehensive income, the cash flow statement, the statement of changes in equity and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and management report for the business year from January 1 to December 31, 2011. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and group management report according to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the European Union (EU), and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to § 315a (1) HGB (German Commercial Code) are the responsibility of the parent company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and on the group management report based on our audit. 8 12 4| Foreword 8| The Art of Coffee At the BSH plant in Traunreut, Bavaria, Andreas Liebl and his team busy themselves perfecting the technology to create expert espresso, with an optimum crema on top. With the passion of an Italian barista, the team strive to get the best aroma from their beans. 12| Cultural Program At the BSH Technology Center for Laundry Care in Berlin, Kathrin Redlin creates washing cycles for a globalized world. Because laundry habits vary from culture to culture. 16| Follow the Trail At BSH in Bad Neustadt, Bavaria, Roland Illig and his team are on the trail of lost energy in the Floor Care Development Center. Their detective work has uncovered a particularly efficient vacuum cleaner. 20| Globetrotters Across China by freight train: Christoph Rohr knows the stresses BSH appliances must endure. He uses his understanding to develop the ideal packaging. 24| A Source of Inspiration At the BSH site in Hoofddorp, near Amsterdam, Ronald Wassenaar re­ volutionizes the kitchen-planning process. He and his team of advisors cater to customers’ individual wishes so they find the appliances that best fit their desires. Afterwards they plan the rest of the kitchen. We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with § 317 HGB and German generally accepted standards for the audit of financial statements promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (Institute of Public Auditors in Germany). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit such that misstatements materially affecting the presentation of the net assets, financial position, and results of operations in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework and in the group management report are detected with reasonable assurance. Knowledge of the business activities and the economic and legal environment of the Group and expectations as to possible misstatements are taken into account in the determination of audit procedures. The effectiveness of the accounting-related internal control system and the evidence supporting the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and the group management report are examined primarily on a test basis within the framework of the audit. The audit includes assessing the annual financial statements of those entities included in consolidation, the determination of entities to be included in consolidation, the accounting and consolidation principles used, and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and the group management report. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit has not led to any reservations. In our opinion, based on the findings of our audit, the consolidated financial statements of BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich, comply with IFRS, as adopted by the EU, the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to § 315a (1) HGB and give a true and fair view of the net assets, financial position and results of operations of the group in accordance with these requirements. The group management report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and as a whole provides a suitable view of the group’s position and suitably presents the opportunities and risks of future development. Munich, April 5, 2012 Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (Prof. Dr. Plendl) Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Public Auditor) (Prosig) Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Public Auditor) 117 118 Total Commitment. Top Performance. With Responsibility. Excellent, committed employees are what characterizes BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, today more than ever. They are the power behind the strong performance of our products and solutions and therefore form the foundation for our economic success. It is one of our fundamental principles, which we have internalized, that every­thing we do must demonstrate our commitment to society and the environment. Our Annual and Sustainability Reports will show how economic success and responsible action are mutually interdependent. Both reports are available as pdf versions on the Internet at: www.bsh-group.com | B S H st a y s th e c o u r s e In what was a difficult financial year, BSH once again managed to exceed its The latest Sustainability Report will be available from mid-June 2012. revenue expectations and generate positive earnings. This confirms that we have embarked on the right path. Thanks to the development of attractive home appliances that deliver top performance with low energy consumption, we can stay on track even in turbulent times. BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Carl-Wery-Strasse 34, 81739 Munich, Germany Tel. +49 89 4590-01 Fax +49 89 4590-2347 www.bsh-group.com Media contact: Corporate Communications Tel. +49 89 4590-2809 Fax +49 89 4590-2128 corporate.communications@bshg.com The Annual Report and the following further publications are available in German and English: • Sustainability Report 2011 • Our Super Efficiency Portfolio 2011 • BSH at a Glance 2012 This report was printed climate neutrally on FSC-certified Hello Silk paper. Right of amendment reserved, errors excepted. Printed in Germany. May 2012. © BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH. Reproduction and use in all media, whether complete or in part, subject to approval. | Summary of Past Performance | Key Figures in EUR million 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 8,405 8,758 8,818 8,308 7,340 6 8 – 4 – 1 6 13 7 79 79 78 80 81 78 78 45.6 42.8 39.6 40.3 39.0 38.0 35.5 1,893 1,807 1,688 1,646 1,663 1,480 1,411 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 294 382 378 358 333 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 3.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.5 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 320 299 257 281 223 As percentage of capital expenditure 65 74 109 78 68 78 67 7,435 6,901 6,443 6,173 6,276 5,950 5,325 Year-to-year change in % International sales revenue proportion (%) Employees (in thousands at 01.01. of the following year) Personnel expenses* Balance sheet total Fixed assets and non-current financial assets 2,655 2,688 2,496 2,349 2,374 2,259 Group A nnual Repor t 2011 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Group) Group Annual Report 2011 Total Commitment. Top Performance. 1,957 in EUR million 2011 2010 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 Year-to-year change in % 6 8 79 79 EBITDA * 943 1,052 EBIT * 647 754 Profit before tax 538 691 Consolidated net profit 373 465 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 65 74 Balance sheet total 7,435 6,901 Equity 2,409 2,408 32 35 International sales revenue proportion (%) 1,305 1,226 1,032 1,074 1,103 1,019 828 Trade receivables from sales of goods and services and other current assets 2,691 2,199 1,954 2,031 2,053 2,052 1,655 Equity 2,409 2,408 2,535 2,396 2,372 2,057 1,859 32 35 39 39 38 35 35 As percentage of total equity and liabilities Provisions 1,760 1,857 1,702 1,593 1,673 1,709 1,581 EBITDA* 943 1,052 905 867 949 868 768 EBIT* 647 754 585 568 692 587 542 Profit before tax Consolidated net profit 538 373 691 465 517 324 510 311 637 411 542 372 500 386 *2005 – 2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H Inventories As percentage of capital investment As percentage of total equity and liabilities *2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expenditure and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH was founded in 1967 as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, and Siemens AG, Berlin/Munich. The company is now the third-largest home appliances manufacturer worldwide, and number one in Europe, with sales of EUR 9.654 billion in 2011. The Group’s product portfolio spans the entire spectrum of modern domestic appliances. It ranges from stoves, ovens and extractor hoods to dishwashers, washers and dryers, fridges and freezers to small appliances (Consumer Products) such as vacuum cleaners, coffee machines, kettles, irons and hairdryers. On December 31, 2011 the Munich-based group had 42 factories across Europe, Asia llflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480. and North America as well as a global network of sales and customer service outlets in almost 50 countries. BSH employed over 45,600 people in 2011, with over 70 percent of these in Europe. In spring 2012, BSH was ranked as a top employer in Germany by the CRF Institute in the sixth consecutive year; the company also achieved this top accolade for the first time in Poland and the Netherlands. BSH was awarded first place in the innovation management category of the top employer ranking for engineers. Main Brands Special Brands Regional Brands Bosch and Siemens: these two brands are known worldwide and have a long history, underpinning our international success. Bosch stands for reliable, durable products; Siemens stands for innovation, leading-edge technology and quality design. The BSH brand portfolio includes the special brands Gaggenau and Neff, Thermador, Constructa, Viva, Ufesa and Junker. These ensure we meet the wide-ranging requirements of our various customers. Regional brands are the market leaders which garner respect in their countries of origin. Brands with which our regional consumers particularly identify include Balay in Spain, Pitsos in Greece, Profilo in Turkey and Coldex in Peru. Such brands help strengthen BSH’s position in these countries. | BSH Worldwide • Helsinki Oslo • Environmental and climate protection have always been firmly anchored in the Group‘s corporate strategy. BSH’s energy- and watersaving household appliances contribute to the efficient use of resources. We have listed our most efficient appliances in a Super Efficiency Portfolio since 2009. BSH has also set itself a 2015 target to reduce resource use in manufacturing and administration by 25 percent. • St. Petersburg • Stockholm • Moscow • Ballerup TM TM • Toronto Irvine New Bern • La Follette Casablanca • • Tel Aviv • Dubai • Jeddah • Mumbai • Mexico City Chuzhou • Seoul • Nanjing Wuxi Milton Keynes • • Hong Kong Kabinburi • Bangkok • Amsterdam Nauen Brussels • Berlin • Warsaw Lódź • Kiev Bad Neustadt • Prague Luxembourg • Bretten • Michalovce Giengen • Regensburg Paris • Munich Lipsheim Dillingen Traunreut• Vienna• Budapest Geroldswil • • Kuala Lumpur • Singapore Lima • Nazarje • São Paulo Buenos Aires • • Montevideo Milan • • Johannesburg Melbourne • Auckland • Santander Vitoria • Huarte Estella Esquiroz Zaragoza • La Cartuja Montañana • Bucharest Çerkezköy • Istanbul • Lisbon • Athens Flexibilität und Freizügigkeit. Mit dem Vollflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480 von Gaggenau ist erstmals die gesamte Kochzone nutzbar. Das Kochgeschirr wird automatisch erkannt und dort erhitzt, wo es gerade steht. Group Headquarters • Subsidiaries Factories: Cooking Refrigeration/Freezing Dishwashing Washing/Drying Consumer Products Motors, pumps BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH was founded in 1967 as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, and Siemens AG, Berlin/Munich. The company is now the third-largest home appliances manufacturer worldwide, and number one in Europe, with sales of EUR 9.654 billion in 2011. The Group’s product portfolio spans the entire spectrum of modern domestic appliances. It ranges from stoves, ovens and extractor hoods to dishwashers, washers and dryers, fridges and freezers to small appliances (Consumer Products) such as vacuum cleaners, coffee machines, kettles, irons and hairdryers. On December 31, 2011 the Munich-based group had 42 factories across Europe, Asia llflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480. and North America as well as a global network of sales and customer service outlets in almost 50 countries. BSH employed over 45,600 people in 2011, with over 70 percent of these in Europe. In spring 2012, BSH was ranked as a top employer in Germany by the CRF Institute in the sixth consecutive year; the company also achieved this top accolade for the first time in Poland and the Netherlands. BSH was awarded first place in the innovation management category of the top employer ranking for engineers. Main Brands Special Brands Regional Brands Bosch and Siemens: these two brands are known worldwide and have a long history, underpinning our international success. Bosch stands for reliable, durable products; Siemens stands for innovation, leading-edge technology and quality design. The BSH brand portfolio includes the special brands Gaggenau and Neff, Thermador, Constructa, Viva, Ufesa and Junker. These ensure we meet the wide-ranging requirements of our various customers. Regional brands are the market leaders which garner respect in their countries of origin. Brands with which our regional consumers particularly identify include Balay in Spain, Pitsos in Greece, Profilo in Turkey and Coldex in Peru. Such brands help strengthen BSH’s position in these countries. | BSH Worldwide • Helsinki Oslo • Environmental and climate protection have always been firmly anchored in the Group‘s corporate strategy. BSH’s energy- and watersaving household appliances contribute to the efficient use of resources. We have listed our most efficient appliances in a Super Efficiency Portfolio since 2009. BSH has also set itself a 2015 target to reduce resource use in manufacturing and administration by 25 percent. • St. Petersburg • Stockholm • Moscow • Ballerup TM TM • Toronto Irvine New Bern • La Follette Casablanca • • Tel Aviv • Dubai • Jeddah • Mumbai • Mexico City Chuzhou • Seoul • Nanjing Wuxi Milton Keynes • • Hong Kong Kabinburi • Bangkok • Amsterdam Nauen Brussels • Berlin • Warsaw Lódź • Kiev Bad Neustadt • Prague Luxembourg • Bretten • Michalovce Giengen • Regensburg Paris • Munich Lipsheim Dillingen Traunreut• Vienna• Budapest Geroldswil • • Kuala Lumpur • Singapore Lima • Nazarje • São Paulo Buenos Aires • • Montevideo Milan • • Johannesburg Melbourne • Auckland • Santander Vitoria • Huarte Estella Esquiroz Zaragoza • La Cartuja Montañana • Bucharest Çerkezköy • Istanbul • Lisbon • Athens Flexibilität und Freizügigkeit. Mit dem Vollflächeninduktions-Kochfeld CX 480 von Gaggenau ist erstmals die gesamte Kochzone nutzbar. Das Kochgeschirr wird automatisch erkannt und dort erhitzt, wo es gerade steht. Group Headquarters • Subsidiaries Factories: Cooking Refrigeration/Freezing Dishwashing Washing/Drying Consumer Products Motors, pumps | Summary of Past Performance | Key Figures in EUR million 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 8,405 8,758 8,818 8,308 7,340 6 8 – 4 – 1 6 13 7 79 79 78 80 81 78 78 45.6 42.8 39.6 40.3 39.0 38.0 35.5 1,893 1,807 1,688 1,646 1,663 1,480 1,411 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 294 382 378 358 333 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 3.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.5 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 320 299 257 281 223 As percentage of capital expenditure 65 74 109 78 68 78 67 7,435 6,901 6,443 6,173 6,276 5,950 5,325 Year-to-year change in % International sales revenue proportion (%) Employees (in thousands at 01.01. of the following year) Personnel expenses* Balance sheet total Fixed assets and non-current financial assets 2,655 2,688 2,496 2,349 2,374 2,259 Group A nnual Repor t 2011 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Group) Group Annual Report 2011 Total Commitment. Top Performance. 1,957 in EUR million 2011 2010 Sales revenue 9,654 9,073 Year-to-year change in % 6 8 79 79 EBITDA * 943 1,052 EBIT * 647 754 Profit before tax 538 691 Consolidated net profit 373 465 Capital expenditure on fixed assets** 453 403 As percentage of sales revenue 4.7 4.4 Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses on fixed assets** 296 298 65 74 Balance sheet total 7,435 6,901 Equity 2,409 2,408 32 35 International sales revenue proportion (%) 1,305 1,226 1,032 1,074 1,103 1,019 828 Trade receivables from sales of goods and services and other current assets 2,691 2,199 1,954 2,031 2,053 2,052 1,655 Equity 2,409 2,408 2,535 2,396 2,372 2,057 1,859 32 35 39 39 38 35 35 As percentage of total equity and liabilities Provisions 1,760 1,857 1,702 1,593 1,673 1,709 1,581 EBITDA* 943 1,052 905 867 949 868 768 EBIT* 647 754 585 568 692 587 542 Profit before tax Consolidated net profit 538 373 691 465 517 324 510 311 637 411 542 372 500 386 *2005 – 2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expense and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H Inventories As percentage of capital investment As percentage of total equity and liabilities *2010 values after adjusting the reporting of interest expenditure and income from plan assets from pension, semi-retirement and long service bonus obligations. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further explanations. ** Excluding goodwill. B S H B O S C H U N D S I E M E N S H A U S G E R ÄT E G M B H