Agenda Responsibilities, Legislation and Guidance Ageing Plant Methodology Ageing Mechanisms Management of Ageing Summary David Burgess, ABB Consulting, September 2012 The Challenge of Ageing Assets in the Bulk Liquid Storage Industry © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 1 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 2 Responsibilities As an owner, user or manager of equipment containing hazardous fluids, you have an overriding responsibility to your employees, contractors, other site residents, the general public, and to the environment for ensuring: Responsibilities, Health and Safety. Minimum impact of operations outside the site. Legislation and Guidance These responsibilities are effected in terms of: Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Control of Hazardous Chemicals and Dangerous Substances. Safe and reliable operation and maintenance of plant and equipment. Avoidance of nuisance from operations. Minimising waste and discharges. Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 3 Legislation – Storage Tanks © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 4 Publications / Guidance Main Hazard is the inventory of product HSE RR 509 (2006) & RR 823 (2010). Ageing Plant HSE Doc SPC/Tech/Gen/35. Integrity of storage tanks HSE RR 760. Review of Storage Tank Standards EEMUA Guide 159 & API 653. Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Storage Tanks EEMUA Guide 183 – Prevention of Bottom Leakage http://www.chemical.org.uk/non_metallic_storage_tanks. HSE PM 75 & PM 86. Non-metallic storage tanks Not PSSR if < 0.5 barg HASAW Act and PUWER always apply COMAH, IPPC and/or DSEAR (Storage of Dangerous Substances) may also apply depending on the tank contents and location © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 5 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 6 1 Ageing plant – Definition Tanfield railway. Working engine and water tanks in use since 1913 Ageing Plant Methodology Ageing equipment is equipment for which there is evidence or likelihood of significant deterioration and damage taking place since new, or for which there is insufficient information and knowledge available to know the extent to which this possibility exists. Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 7 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 8 The Ageing Stage – What are the Signs? Accumulated d Damage Ac ccumulated Damage Equipment Life – 4 Stage Model Time Initial Operation Mature Stage Ageing Stage Terminal Stage •Approaching design limits eg. remaining life assessment •Evidence of significant accumulated damage •Changes in process use •Repairs, refits, modifications •Deficiencies in systems and skills Time Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure Initial Operation Ageing Stage Terminal Stage Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 9 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 10 Four Stages of Ageing - Description STAGE 1 - POST COMMISSIONING (‘INITIAL’) Mature Stage What affects asset life? STAGE 2 - RISK-BASED (‘MATURITY’) Design and manufacturing faults Operation well within design limits Installation issues (bolting, valves, leaks) Retained corporate knowledge of design/manufacture Commissioning issues (over/under filling) Ageing damage not yet significant; Early life operating faults (training, trials) Routine maintenance Shake-down Extended operating periods Identification of potential ageing sites First thorough examination (finger-print) Selected inspection, by risk analysis, to confirm expectation of slow degradation Reducing rate of problems Updated risk analysis from experience Rate of damage low and predictable •Life-limiting factors assumed at design stage •Design quality Design •Quality of original fabrication & installation Construction •Operating within design limits Knowledge of equipment condition e.g. Suppliers •Inspection of static equipment STAGE 3 - DETERMINISTIC (‘AGEING’) Design limits approaching Evidence of active deterioration Repairs, refits, modifications Changes in process/use Lack of full history/corporate memory Changes in ownership; second hand plant Quantitative NDT inspection to measure extent and rate of damage accumulation FFS assessment required for life extension Degradation rate increasing - less predictable STAGE 4 - MONITORED (‘TERMINAL’) •Obsolescence of equipment Accelerating and accumulating damage Beyond design limits and known operating experience Approaching safe operating limits Advanced inspection and FFS required to determine residual life Decreasing intervals between inspections Major repairs and refits replacement needed •Maintaining equipment in ‘fit for service’ condition End of life based on costs of repairs or replacement and wider economic factors •Quality of spare parts and repairs Inspection •Change of equipment or operating procedure that negates original design assumptions Maintenance Modifications Asset Life Factors Across the Life Cycle Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 11 •Condition Monitoring of rotating equipment Operation © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 12 2 Ageing Plant – Not us? Current Performance on Ageing Plant The quotes below are typical examples from organisations and individuals that are not recognising or acting on the signs of ageing There haven’t been any problems up to now, so the equipment is safe, isn’t it? We don’t have any drawings for this vessel; and we don’t know what the material is. It’ only It’s l been b in i service i for f two t years so it can’t ’t be b ageing. i The integrity of our equipment is separate from our safety management. Our equipment does not contain defects. We maintain and inspect only equipment to meet the Pressure Systems Regulations. Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 13 Ref: IChemE Loss Prevention Bulletin 224, April 2012 - Management of Ageing Plant, S Pointer HSE © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 14 Types of Material Damage Mechanisms Damage to material can be categorised into four main types: Wall thinning. Ageing Mechanisms General or localised corrosion, pitting, CUI Erosion, erosion-corrosion, scouring Wear, abrasion, fretting Stress-driven damage, cracking and fracture. Fatigue damage and cracking Creep cavitation and creep crack growth Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) Brittle fracture Hydrogen cracking Ductile tearing Physical deformation. Metallurgical / environmental damage. Dents, Gouges, Buckling and Yielding Various embrittlements – hydrogen, temper, strain age, sigma phase Polymer ageing – UV radiation, temperature, chemical attack Ref: HSE RR 509 – Plant Ageing – Management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 15 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 16 Damage Mechanisms – 2009 Data. Damage Mechanisms – Identifying Root Causes No of Failures 40 35 30 25 20 No oo of Failures a u es 15 10 5 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 17 Wear Over Pressure Overheating Creep Brittle fracture Mechanical Failure Erosion Weld Failure Fatigue SCC Corrosion 0 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 18 3 External Corrosion Corrosion under insulation Storage tank at shell base Local to water traps e.g. insulation support rings, wind girders Insulated pipes to and from tank Design Temp : 100 Deg Baseplate Nominal Thickness : 10.0mm Depth of Corrosion Up to 8.0mm © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 19 Bottom Plate Rotation – Low Cycle Fatigue © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 20 Non Metallic – Mechanical Properties Material Specific Gravity Tensile Stress (Mpa) 1.4 55 PVC PP PTFE GRP C-steel C steel 0.9 2.2 1.4 78 7.8 25 20 100 400 Ni Alloys 8.0 1200 Graph and Table are for indication purposes only. Do not use figures for specific design assessment © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 21 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 22 Non Metallic tanks – condition & inspection There are thousands in service, commonly manufactured from: Thermoplastic (HDPE, PP, PVC etc.) GRP (Glass Fibre + Resin Binder ie. “Derakane”, “Atlac”, “Furane”) GRP / Plastic lined Non Metallic tanks are much weaker than steel tanks (see previous slide) Not “fit-and-forget” – they do have a finite life and will deteriorate Typically limited data from manufacturer and in many cases little appreciation by operators of need, or method of inspection Recent Guidance by HSE in conjunction with industry experts PM 75 – GRP vessels and tanks – advice to users PM 86 – Thermoplastic tanks (issue due shortly) © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 23 Management of Ageing © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 24 4 Management of Ageing – Case study Is integrity managed? 7 Key elements for the identification and management of ageing plant Unsupported branch fatigue failure 1. Maintenance Management Systems (Weak procedures did not act on increasing vibration trend) Low pressure items often overlooked Identify deterioration mechanisms Eliminate deterioration mechanisms where possible 2. Asset Management and Integrity Systems (Weak assessment approach that did not include dead-legs) Establish rate of deterioration 3. Audit and Inspection regimes Risk Management Establish Inspection frequency 4. Risk Assessment Management processes (Not identifying risks of unsupported branch on live system) Prepare Written Scheme of Examination 5. Management of Change procedures (Not recognising effects of change during modification) 6. Responsibilities and Communications (ownership / responsibility of asset not established) 7. Training and Competence development (Staff did not recognise potential for failure) Planned & Controlled Work Select appropriate Inspection / NDT techniques (Vibration / fatigue potential not picked up during inspection) A modification had been carried out several years before failure, leaving a section of pipework inadequately supported Auditing Competent People Inspect Review WSE Vibration of the unsupported pipework had not be noticed/reported Reliable Assets ASSET INTEGRITY Training Monitoring Effective Systems Information Systems Methods and procedures Ref: HSE RR 823 – Plant Ageing Study 2010 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 25 Do you know your critical equipment © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 26 Do inspection schemes include all damage mechanisms? Consider Criticality Screening/Assessment © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 27 Inspection frequencies © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 28 Consider Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Codes are not Prescriptive. Only guidance given New assets Example:- Table from EEMUA 159 Other factors to consider, listed in API 653:- nature of product - corrosion rates - operational regime - prevention systems Criticality & Opportunity S Screening i Existing assets Equipment Prioritisation © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 29 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 30 5 RBI Example - Riveted Tank Built in 1893 >100 years old Flammable contents – Diesel COMAH Inventory Significant history of repairs Weeping at Rivets Frequent Inspections specified Replacement recommended Prioritise inspection with NDT screening techniques eg. Acoustic Emission (AE) Testing AE sensors of tank shell plates on a lower tank shell course Determine the origin (location) of active corrosion by triangulation 2 1 3 ‘A: very minor ‘B’: minor ‘C’: intermediate IV Very active damage, open the tank. III Active damage, plan repair, re-test after 1 year. II Minor active damage, re-test after 3 years. I No active damage, re-test after 5 years. n/a Should not occur at standard threshold © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 31 For ageing and vulnerable items in the terminal stage, the potential for defects and leaks should be considered and planned for: Identify potential failure scenarios based on condition eg. base leak, hole in shell. Contingency plan for leaks / defects – options may include: Transfer of inventory Temporary repair Continue operation and manage leak / defect Shutdown C D E 5 III III IV IV IV 4 II III III IV IV 3 II II III III III 2 I I II II n/a 1 I I II n/a n/a ‘D’: active ‘E’: highly active. Operational risk assessment Emergency plan Roles and responsibilities Materials and services Summary Know and understand you assets and their ageing status Identify and manage deterioration mechanisms and look to minimise or eliminate as many as possible / practical Have in place a sound integrity management system Allocate responsibility for assets within your organisation Use an experienced and capable inspection organisation Use the standards and guidelines available (100 years experience) Carry out regular visual checks with own staff B © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 32 Management of items in ‘Terminal Stage’ of Life A Plan for permanent repair / replacement Funding Resources / contracts Planned outage © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 33 Act on any defects identified to prevent further damage Ageing assets can be managed safely and effectively providing the methodology is understood and applied. © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 34 Thankyou for listening Any Questions? © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 35 © ABB Group August 30, 2012 | Slide 36 6