Seismic Safety – Restraint of Building Services

advertisement

Seismic Safety – Restraint of Building Services

Graeme Beattie, BRANZ

2015 HVAC&R Trade Exhibition & Industry Conference – 15 May 2015

Who am I and what do I do?

► Principal Structural Engineer – BRANZ

► Research and test restraint systems for non-structural components

► Contribute to standards development in the engineering sector

Outline of this presentation

► Setting the scene – equipment failures

► Regulatory requirements

– Standards

► Practical behaviour of components

► Design examples

► Issues with ceiling spaces

► Conclusions

Equipment failures

► Maule earthquake (Chile) 2010

– Not New Zealand, but the issues are the same

Failure of suspended ceiling grid and services connections

Equipment failures

Failure of services support in ceiling space

Equipment failures

Toppling of a roof-mounted water tank

From SR Uma, GNS Science

New Zealand’s building control hierarchy

LAW

Building

Act

Building Regulations

Schedule 1 (Building Code)

Alternative Solutions

Standards

Acceptable Solutions

Verification Methods

Cited standards

MBIE guidance documents MBIE guidance (process)

Means of compliance

From MBIE

Building Act

► Building Act

– Section 17 of the Building Act requires that all building work must comply with the building code

– Responsibilities of the designer (s14D – inserted

13/3/12)

• Prepares plans and specifications for building work

• Ensures plans and specifications are sufficient to result in building work complying with the building code

Building Act

► Building Act

– Responsibilities of the product manufacturer or supplier (s14G – inserted 28/11/13)

• Manufactures or supplies a building product and states that the product will, if installed in accordance with the technical data, plans, specifications and advice provided by the manufacturer , comply with the relevant provisions of the building code

• Ensures that the product will, if properly installed in accordance with … will comply with the relevant provisions of the building code

Building Act

► Building Act

– Definition of ‘ building ’ (s8)

1(a) a temporary or permanent movable or immovable structure

(including a structure intended for occupation by people, animals, machinery, or chattels); and

1(b) includes

(i) a mechanical, electrical, or other system; and

2 Subsection 1(b)(i) only applies if –

(a) the mechanical, electrical or other system is attached to the structure referred to in subsection 1(a); and

(b) the system –

(i) is required by the building code; or

(ii) if installed, is required to comply with the building code.

Building Act

► Building Act

– Definition of ‘ building work ’ (s7)

(a) Means work

(i) for or in connection with the construction , alteration, demolition, or removal of a building

Building Regulations 1992

► Schedule 1 of the Regulations is the building code

► r3(2) - Except as otherwise provided by the

Act, each building shall achieve the performance criteria specified in the building code for the classified use of that building …

► The classified uses are housing, communal residential and non-residential, commercial, industrial, outbuildings and ancillary

Building Regulations 1992 Schedule 1

► Clause B1 Structure

– B1.2 Functional requirement

Buildings , building elements and sitework shall withstand the combination of loads that they are likely to experience during construction or alteration and throughout their lives.

– B1.3.1 Performance

Buildings , building elements and sitework shall have a low probability of rupturing, becoming unstable, losing equilibrium, or collapsing during construction or alteration and throughout their lives.

– B1.3.3 Performance

Account shall be taken of all physical conditions…incl.:

(f) earthquake

New Zealand’s building control hierarchy

LAW

Building

Act

Building Regulations

Schedule 1 (Building Code)

Alternative Solutions

Standards

Acceptable Solutions

Verification Methods

Cited standards

MBIE guidance documents MBIE guidance (process)

Means of compliance

From MBIE

Means of compliance

► Verification Methods

► Acceptable Solutions

► Cited standards

► Alternative solutions

► Non-cited standards

► MBIE guidance documents

Clause B1 Structure

► Two options for demonstrating compliance

1. Verification Method B1/VM1, which cites and modifies the following standards:

• Structural design actions standards (loadings)

– Follow requirements of the AS/NZS 1170 suite of standards

(including NZS 1170.5 Earthquake actions – New Zealand )

• Materials standards

– NZS 3404, NZS 4600, NZS 3101

OR

• Cited standard NZS 4219

2. Alternative Solution

• Testing or history of performance

Clause B1 Structure

► Verification Method B1/VM1

– For seismic performance of engineering systems in buildings can use NZS 4219

• Subject to the following modifications in the Canterbury earthquake region :

• Where the building structure period is less than 1.5 seconds, the zone factor Z shall be determined from the standard but shall not be less than 0.3.

• The component risk factor R

C shall be determined from the standard but shall not be less than 0.33.

Note that NZS 4219 is an application of NZS 1170.5

Section 8 Requirements for Parts and Components

Building and component behaviour

Element motion larger

Roof motion larger

Element motion smaller

1 st floor motion smaller

Ground motion

Building and component behaviour

Tall items have desire to overturn

Squat items have desire to slide

Hanging items have desire to swing

Earthquake load demand

► Floor accelerations may be provided by the structural engineer (%g)

– Caution – care is required in determining the design action on the component as amplification of the floor acceleration is expected

OR

► Otherwise the design action on the component may be approximated via the use of a lateral force coefficient

– Coefficient is generally constant – difference between NZS 1170.5 and NZS 4219

Earthquake load demand

F = C x W

Where:

F = earthquake load demand

C = lateral force coefficient

W = operating weight of the equipment

Comparison of standards

► NZS 1170.5 Section 8

F ph

= C(0) x C

Hi x C i

(T p

) x C ph x R p x W p

≤ 3.6W

p

Where:

F ph

= horizontal earthquake action on the part

C(0) = site hazard coefficient for T=0 (zero period)

C

Hi

= C h

(0) x Z x R x N(T,D) (R reflects building importance)

= floor height coefficient for level i (1 to 3 (3 above 12 m))

C i

(T p

) = part spectral shape factor at level i

(0.5 for T p

≥ 1.5s to 2.0 for T p

≤ 0.75s)

= part horizontal response factor (0.45 to 1.0 (ductility)) C ph

R p

W p

= part risk factor (based on risk to life or need to operate)

= weight of the part

Comparison of standards

► NZS 4219 (application of NZS 1170.5)

F = 2.7 x C

H x Z x C p x R c x W ≤ 3.6W

Where:

F = horizontal earthquake action on the part

2.7

= max.C(0) x max.C

i

(T p

) = 1.33 x 2.0 ≈ 2.7

C

Z

H

= simplified in NZS 4219 (1.0 at or below ground, otherwise 3.0)

= zone factor (= Z in 1170.5)

C p

= performance factor (max. 0.85 but can be lower for P1 to P4 under ULS loads)

R c

= component risk factor (based on importance level (Table 1) and component category (Table 2))

W = operating weight of the component

Comparison of standards

F ph

= C(0) x C i

(T p

) x C

Hi x C ph x R p x W p

(1170.5)

F = 2.7 x Z x C

H x C p x R c x W (4219)

Comparison:

F ph

= F = horizontal earthquake action on the component

C(0) = C h

(0) x Z x R x N(D,T) ; max C h

(0) = 1.33

C i

(T p

) = 0.5 to 2.0 in NZS 1170.5; always 2.0 in NZS 4219

2.7 = max.C

h

(0) x max.C

i

(T p

) = 1.33 x 2.0 ≈ 2.7

C

H

= simplified in NZS 4219 (see graph)

C

C p ph

= 0.45 to 1.0 in NZS 1170.5

= 0.45 to 0.85 in NZS 4219 (App. C)

R p

R c

= 0.9 to 1.0 in NZS 1170.5 (except P6 where R p

= 2.0)

= 0.9 to 1.8 in NZS 4219 (except P6 & P7)

W p

(R c

Table includes the R factor for importance)

= W

12m

1170.5

1st

0 1

4219

3 C

H

Part category, P

► There are 7 part categories

► NZS 4219 Table 2 categorises what failure of the part would mean for the building or its occupants

Criteria

Representing hazard to life outside the building

Representing hazard to a crowd of >100 people within the building

Representing hazard to individual life within the building

Necessary for continuing function of the evacuation and life safety systems in the building

Component of a system reqd. for operational continuity of the building

Component for which the consequential damage caused by its failure is disproportionately great

All other components

Note: P5 only applies to IL4 buildings

Category

P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

P7

Limit state

ULS

ULS

ULS

ULS

SLS2

SLS1

SLS1

Design example 1 – NZS 4219

Floor-mounted refrigeration unit on the top floor of a six-storey office building in

Christchurch

NZS 4219 approach for hold-down bolt design

F

C of G

W=300kg

1m

R vt

H

0.7m

R vc

H

Design example 1 – NZS 4219

Table 1 → Importance level 2 (office building)

Table 2 → Category P3 (hazard to individual life)

Table 4 → Anchors, fasteners and fixings → C p

= 0.85

Table 5 → Category P3 and importance level 2 → R c

= 0.9

C = 2.7 x C

H x Z x C p x R c

= 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.3 x 0.85 x 0.90

= 1.86

F = 1.86 x 300 x 9.81 / 1000 = 5.5 kN

R vt

= (5.5 x 1.0 / 0.7) – (300 x 9.81 /1000 /2)

= 2.38 kN (distribute between supports on this line)

H = F/2 = 5.5/2 = 2.75 kN (distribute as above)

Note: Design hold-down for loading at right angles also

Design example 2 – NZS 4219

100 kg air-conditioner unit suspended from the soffit of a concrete floor slab on four hangers in a Wellington hospital theatre building 400

NZS 4219 approach for bracing and anchor bolt design

2000

Brace

11º

Air conditioner

100kg

F

Design example 2 – NZS 4219

Table 1 → Building is IL4 (post earthquake operation critical)

Table 2 → Category P3 (hazard to individual life), also P5

Table 3 → Z = 0.4 (located in Wellington)

Table 4 → Braces and supports → C p

= 0.85

Table 5 → Category P3 and Importance level 4 → R c

= 1.60 (P5: R c

=1.0)

C = 2.7 x C

H x Z x C p x R c

= 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.4 x 0.85 x 1.60

= 4.4 (but not to be greater than 3.6 (Eqn 3.2))

F = 3.6 x 100 x 9.81 / 1000 = 3.53 kN

Angle of brace = 11°

Force in brace (2 off) = 3.53/2 x 1/cos11° = 1.8 kN (T and C)

Length of brace = 2.04 m

40 x 40 x 3 mm mild steel angle brace with one M12 bolt reqd (Table 14)

Note: Design braces for loading at right angles also

Comments on design examples

► Examples are non-specific design

– Specific design to NZS 1170.5 may be done instead

– This would generally result in a lesser calculated seismic demand

► Displacement-affected components

– Some components will be affected more by inter-storey displacement than floor accelerations

– Examples are pipes and ducts extending up the building

– If the inter-storey displacement is unknown, assume:

Displacement, D = 0.025 x R c x H z where R c is the component risk factor from NZS 4219 but need not be greater than 1.0, and

H z is the height between fixing points

Issues with ceiling spaces

► Generally there are several services in ceiling spaces

► Co-ordination between services installers and the suspended ceiling installer is critical to a successful project

Rules for ceiling spaces

Duct

≤ 200

Concrete floor

Brace

≥ 150

> 200

≥ 50

Ceiling hanger

Duct

Braced suspended ceiling

≥ 50

Restraints in the field

Examples of seismic restraint systems

Conclusions

► Seismic restraint of non-structural components is critical for a building to continue functioning after an earthquake

► Building Act requirements apply to mechanical plant if required for the building to function

► NZS 4219 is an application of NZS 1170.5

– Covers specific and non-specific design of restraints

► If components are expected to move, space is required to prevent impact

► Careful co-ordination of system installation required

Funding acknowledgement

This presentation was made possible through funding from the Building Research Levy

BRANZ shake table testing

BRANZ shake table testing

Download