Assessment of Final HIPAA ICD 10 Rule Compliance Requirements January 23, 2009 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary.................................................................................................................................................. 1 What Is In The Final Rule? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Compliance Date .................................................................................................................................. 2 Compliance Approach .......................................................................................................................... 2 Impact on Current Payment Systems ..................................................................................................... 2 Other Impacts of ICD 10....................................................................................................................... 3 How are ICD 10 codes formatted?......................................................................................................... 3 Problems with ICD 9 ............................................................................................................................ 4 Benefits of ICD 10................................................................................................................................ 4 Reference ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction On January 16, 2009, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) published the final rule for update of the Medical Code Set requirements for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) standards. Under the final rule, ICD 10 will be required for the coding of both diagnosis (ICD-10-CM) and procedures (ICD-10-PCS) for all HIPAA EDI standard transactions. Summary The following are the key points for attention for the requirements of the final rule and its applicability to Millennium: The final rule calls for adoption of ICD 10 CM (diagnosis coding) and ICD 10 PCS (procedure coding) by October 1, 2013 The compliance date is a “big bang” in that all HIPAA covered entities must adopt ICD 10 for all HIPAA EDI standard transactions by the above date o DHHS does not want covered entities (providers, health plans and clearinghouses) to voluntarily adopt ICD 10 ahead of the compliance date The largest impact is on hospital inpatient services coding of diagnosis and procedures ICD 10 adoption DOES NOT affect procedure coding for physician services and hospital outpatient services o HCPCS codes will continue to be used for Medicare part B hospital outpatient services for procedure and services coding o CPT codes will continue to be used for Medicare part B physician services for procedure and services coding The impact also will be upon all hospital departments, information systems, databases, content, decision support processes and business processes that rely on diagnosis or procedure coding data based on ICD 9 – presumably all must be updated There is an available “generalized equivalency map” available from CMS that provides a mapping between ICD 9 and ICD 10 CM and ICD 10 PCS o In most cases, the mapping works to be a one to many mapping from ICD 9 to ICD 10 Cerner Corporation Confidential Information ©Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains confidential and/or proprietary information which may not be reproduced or transmitted without the express written consent of Cerner. CMS suggests in their guidance on the use of the mappings that users either use the concept represented by the ICD 9 code as a basis for rolling up all equivalent ICD 10 codes in presenting data or select the ICD 10 code that most appropriately represents the use of the ICD 9 code for purpose of crosswalk, presenting trended data or for other translation purposes Cerner is currently assessing the impact of ICD 10 on Millennium solutions and Cerner content offerings o We anticipate this assessment will be complete in the first part of 2009, and more guidance will be provided as to our strategy during the first half of 2009 o What Is In The Final Rule? The final rule has several key sections in which DHHS outlines their rationale for proposing the ICD 10 requirement. These are summarized below. Compliance Date DHHS has adopted a compliance date of October 1, 2013. In this, DHHS is staggering the compliance date 21 months behind the adopted compliance date for the adoption of the next generation of HIPAA EDI based on ANSI X-12 v 5010 and the NCPDP D.0 transaction sets. Compliance Approach DHHS has finalized the requirement that all covered entities under HIPAA (health plans, providers and clearinghouses) all be subject to the October 1, 2013 compliance date. In this, DHHS stated the following as reasons why to keep all covered entities working towards a common compliance date: To avoid the issues that would come from providers and payers supporting “dual use” of ICD 9 and ICD 10 in overlapping time periods The eliminate the costs of maintaining production systems that would need to support both editions of coding systems using old and new versions The avoid the disruptions and inconsistencies introduced into to workflow for professional coders having to continue to maintain two distinct coding systems based on different payer requirements The reduce the costs of maintaining multiple systems of editing coding information based on both ICD 9 and ICD 10 To avoid possible redundancy in coding values between ICD 9 and ICD 10 if both were in use at the same time To prevent confusion over which coding system is in use to file claims or to report data externally DHHS does not want covered entities to voluntarily adopt the use of ICD 10 ahead of the compliance date. DHHS believes that this would result in confusion, and contribute greatly to errors in coding that would result in claims rejection. Impact on Current Payment Systems DHHS did not attempt to address the impact of the adoption of ICD 10 on the Inpatient Prospective Payment System, Outpatient Prospective Payment System or Physician Fee Schedule relative to how diagnosis and health services are to be coded for grouping purposes for reimbursement by Medicare or by Medicaid. Those impacts will be dealt with through the rule making process specific to each of those reimbursement systems. It can be foreseen that the grouping methodologies as well as the classification of diagnosis into different severity classifications for Medicare Severity adjusted Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) will eventually have to be completely redone as a result of an adoption of ICD 10. In the proposed rule for ICD 10 published in August of 2008, DHHS indicated that CMS will make use of a Cerner Corporation Confidential Information ©Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains confidential and/or proprietary information which may not be reproduced or transmitted without the express written consent of Cerner. crosswalk from ICD 9 to ICD 10 to avoid issues with disruption to the payment system for hospital inpatient services. CMS will look to use the claims data coded with ICD 10 from the first few years after ICD 10 implementation to review the severity classifications of the diagnosis codes, and the grouping impact on DRGs for both diagnosis codes and procedure codes. The impact on the payment system for hospital outpatient services and physician services will be less as the procedure coding systems for those payment systems will remain in place based on HCPCS codes and CPT codes respectively. Editing rules for those payment systems for correct coding edits, medical necessity determination and for claims edits based on diagnosis and procedure coding information will have to be updated for the impact of the changes in the diagnosis coding medical code set requirement with ICD 10 CM. Other Impacts of ICD 10 The adoption of ICD 10 suggests that the coding systems for health services may change for other purposes as well so that hospital HIM coders may rely on a consistent coding system to underlie all coding and abstracting requirements. Beyond the Medicare and Medicaid payment systems, and without attempting to identify an all inclusive list, the change to ICD 10 will have a board set of impacts including but not limited to Restatement of all commercial payer claims adjudication and reimbursement systems that group based on ICD 9 Redefinition of medical necessity edits, inpatient or outpatient code edits and other coding or claims edits that use diagnosis and procedure code information based on ICD 9 Restatement of qualification and exclusion criteria for Medicare’s (or any other) quality measurement requirements for the current pay for reporting programs (or pay for performance programs) for hospital or physician services Restatement of the visit coding algorithms of most Evaluation and Management coding assistant solutions Restatement of the estimated reimbursement algorithms of most Contract Management solutions Redefinition of qualification criteria for many care delivery protocols Redefinition or restatement of criteria used to invoke electronic decision support rules, documentation forms, patient information/education materials or other electronically delivered content supplied by electronic medical records systems Redefinition of algorithms used to classify severity and expected outcomes of a patients condition Redefinition of coding criteria for the identification of hospital acquired conditions or “never events” Breakage of comparability of data for any analytics or reporting that trends over time based on diagnosis or procedure coding absent use of a crosswalk to convert or re-group the data Redefinition of qualification parameters and specification requirements for external regulatory reporting based on diagnosis or procedure codes such as many state discharge or surgical procedure reporting systems Redefinition of algorithms used for utilization review and for provider profiling Redefinition of disease management protocols and algorithms based on diagnosis or patient condition Again, this is only a start to a list, but speaks to the kind of impact a change in coding systems can have on many other operational areas. How are ICD 10 codes formatted? ICD 10 CM codes are three to seven alphanumeric characters. The first character is always alpha, and characters 2-3 are always numeric. Characters 4-7 are alpha or numeric, and a decimal is used after three characters. The alpha characters are not case sensitive. The characters have the following meaning – 1-3 – Category Cerner Corporation Confidential Information ©Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains confidential and/or proprietary information which may not be reproduced or transmitted without the express written consent of Cerner. 4-6 – Etiology, Anatomic Site and Severity 7 – Extension ICD 10 PCS codes have seven characters. The characters can be either alpha or numeric in each position. Alpha characters are not case sensitive, and each code must have seven characters. The characters have the following meaning 1st – Section/Type of Procedure 2nd – Body System 3rd – Root Operation/Objective of Procedure 4th – Body Part 5th – Approach/Technique Used 6th – Devices That Remain After Completion of the Procedure 7th – Qualifier/Additional Information The specific meanings of each digit may vary by specialty. Problems with ICD 9 In general, DHHS offered the following rationale for adopting the ICD 10 medical code set for diagnosis and procedure codes at this time: ICD 9 is running out of space for new codes. CMS has had to begin to assign new codes to inappropriate sections of ICD-9-CM. An example given in the proposed rule is that for new codes for heart procedures, CMS has to assign from open ranges of codes from the eye chapter. This makes for an illogical code assignment given the chapter outlines for available codes. ICD 9 does not provide appropriate flexibility or specificity for adequate description of medical procedures given the changes in medical practice that have occurred since its adoption 27 years ago. ICD 9 does not support purposes for which coding information is now expected to be used. It was never designed to support the needs for increased levels of detail for bio-surveillance or pay for performance programs for quality measures. ICD 9 does not support definition of new DRGs to an adequate level of specificity to support definition of new technologies or medical devices. Many ICD 9 procedure codes are for technologies that are now outdated, and are in need of retirement. ICD 9 does not provide for adequate specificity to address descriptive elements of the service such as bilateral conditions, repeat services or the nature of how a procedure or service was performed (e.g. by what method) Multiple ICD 9 procedure codes may be required to delineate how a service was performed whereas one ICD 10 code could suffice ICD 9 does not provide for adequate support for mortality reporting or infectious disease reporting consistent with international coding requirements and needs used to track such statistics across international boundaries (e.g. most of the rest of the world as well as the World Health Organization uses ICD 10) Benefits of ICD 10 ICD 10 offers significant improvements in coding primary care encounters, external causes of injury, mental disorders, neoplasms and preventive health ICD 10 supports coding for advances in medicine and medical technology since the last revision ICD 10 codes support more detail to be captured on socioeconomic, family relationships, ambulatory care conditions, problems related to lifestyle and the results of screening exams Cerner Corporation Confidential Information ©Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains confidential and/or proprietary information which may not be reproduced or transmitted without the express written consent of Cerner. ICD 10 is expandable for future coding needs ICD 10 supports the concept of laterality allowing for specifying which organ or part of the body is involved when it could be a bilateral situation ICD 10 offers new categories for post procedural disorders ICD 10 offers expanded distinctions for ambulatory and managed care encounters Reference The final rule may be accessed at the following location – http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-743.pdf The CMS ICD 10 general equivalency mappings may be found at the following locations – ICD 10 Procedure Code mapping guide http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ICD10/Downloads/pcs_gemguide_2008.pdf 2. ICD 10 Diagnosis Code mapping guide http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ICD10/03_ICD_10_CM.asp#TopOfPage The American Health Information Management Association’s (AHIMA) ICD 10 Preparation checklist may be found at http://www.ahima.org/icd10/ICD-10PreparationChecklist.mht Cerner Corporation Confidential Information ©Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains confidential and/or proprietary information which may not be reproduced or transmitted without the express written consent of Cerner.