References
Abello, R.P., & Bernaldez, F.G. (1986). Landscape preference and personality.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 19-28.
Achterberg, W. (1994). Houdingen tegenover de natuur. In: Samenleving, natuur en
duurzaamheid, een inleiding in de milieufilosofie (pp. 144-167). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness and growth: Human needs in
organizational settings. New York: The Free Press.
Anderson, I.M. (1981). Land-use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in
forest landscapes. Forest Science, 27, 392-400.
Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
Arcury, T.A. (1990). Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human
Organization, 49, 300-304.
Arcury, T.A., & Christianson, E.H. (1990). Environmental worldview in response to
environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 22, 387-407.
Bal, D., Beije, H.M., Hoogeveen, Y.R., Jansen, S.R.J., & van der Reest, P.J. (1996).
Handboek natuurdoeltypen in Nederland (The handbook of target nature types in The
Netherlands). Wageningen: IKC Natuurbeheer (with English summary).
Balling, J.D., & Falk, J.H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural
environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5-28.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction
in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bixler, R.D. & Floyd, M.F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable.
Environment and Behavior, 29, 443-467.
Bourassa, S.C. (1988). Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 15, 241-252.
Bourassa, S.C. (1990). A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and
Behavior, 22, 787-812.
Brown, T.C., & Daniel, T.C. (1987). Context effects in perceived environmental
quality assessment: Scene selection and landscape quality ratings. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 7, 233-250.
Brown, T.C., Daniel, T.C., Richards, M.T., & King, D.A. (1988). Recreation
participation and the validity of photo-based preference judgments. Journal of Leisure
Research, 20, 40-60.
Brown, T., Keane, T. & Kaplan, S. (1986). Aesthetics and management: Bridging
the gap. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 1-10.
Brush, R.O., & Shafer, E.L. (1975). Application of a landscape-preference model to
lands management. In: E.H. Zube, R.O. Brush, & J.G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment:
Values, perceptions, and resources (pp. 168-182). Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson, &
Ross.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: applications
and data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Buhyoff, G.J., Arnd, L.K., & Probst, D.B. (1981). Interval scaling of landscape
preference by direct and indirict measurement methods. Landscape Planning, 8, 257-267.
Buyhoff, G.J., Wellman, J.D., Harvey, H. & Fraser, R.A. (1978). Landscape
architects' interpretations of people's landscape preferences. Journal of Environmental
Management, 6, 255-262.
Buijs, A.E., & Volker, C.M. (1997). Publiek draagvlak voor natuur en natuurbeleid
(public support for nature and nature policy). Report 546. Wageningen: The Winand Staring
Centre.
References
131
Buttel, F.H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of
Sociology, 13, 465-488.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Tassinary, L.G. (1990). Principles of psychophysiology: Physical,
social, and inferential elements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Canter, D. (1983). The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach.
Environment and Behavior, 15, 659-698.
Catton. W.R., & Dunlap, R.E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for postexuberant sociology. American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
Christensen, N.L., Baruska, A.M., Brown, J.H., Carpenter, S., D’antonio, C.,
Francis, R., Franklin, J.F., MacMahon, J.A., Noss, R.F., Parsons, D.J., Peterson, C.H., Turner,
M.G., & Woodmansee, R.G. (1996). The report of the ecological society of America
committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 6, 665691.
Coeterier, J.F. (1983). A photo validity test. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
3, 315-323.
Coeterier, J.F. (1996). Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the
Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34, 27-44.
Cooper, L.G. (1973). A multivariate investigation of preferences. Multivariate
Behavior Research, 8, 253-272.
Craik, K.H. & Feimer, N.R. (1987). Environmental assessment. In: D. Stokols & I.
Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 891-9185). New York:
Wiley.
Daniel, T.C. (1990). Measuring the quality of the natural environment: A
psychophysical approach. American Psychologist, 45, 633-637.
Daniel, T.C., & Boster, R.C. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic
beauty estimation method. (Research Paper RM-167). Fort Collins, Colorado: USDA Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Daniel, T.C., Brown, T.C., King, D.A., Richards, M.R., & Stewart, W.P. (1989).
Perceived scenic beauty and contingent valuation of forest campgrounds. Forest Science, 35,
76-90.
Daniel, T.C., & Schroeder, H.W. (1979). Scenic beauty estimation model:
Predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes. In: G.H. Elsner & R.D. Smardon (Eds.),
Proceedings of our national landscape. A conference on applied techniques for analysis and
management of the visual resource (General Technical Report PSW-35, pp. 514-523).
Berkeley, California: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment
Station.
Daniel, T.C. & Vining, J.V. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of
landscape quality. In I. Altman & J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.). Human behavior and environment:
Advances in theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 39-83). New York: Plenum Press.
Dearden, P. (1980). A statistic al technique for the evaluation of the visual quality of
the landscape for land-use planning purposes. Journal of Environmental Management, 10, 5168.
Dearden, P. (1981). Landscape Evaluation: the case for a multidimensional
approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 13, 95-105.
Dearden, P. (1984). Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical
investigation. Landscape Planning, 11, 293-306.
Dearden, P. (1987). Consensus and a theoretical framework for landscape
evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 267-278.
DeLucio, J.V., & Mugica, M. (1994). Landscape preferences and behaviour of
visitors to Spanish national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29, 145-160.
References
132
Dimberg, U. (1990). Facial electromyography and emotional reactions.
Psychophysiology, 27, 481-494.
Dunlap, R.E., & Catton, W.R. (1979). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of
Sociology, 5, 243-273.
Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The 'New Environmental Paradigm': a
proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education,
9, 10-19.
Eiser, J.R., Reicher, S.D., & Popadec, T.J. (1993). What's the beach like? Context
effects in judgements of environmental quality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13,
343-352.
Fenton, D.M. (1985). Dimensions of meaning in the perception of natural settings
and their relationship to aesthetic response. Australian Journal of Psychology, 37, 325-339.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An
introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gallagher, T.J. (1977). Visual preference for alternative natural landscapes.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
González Bernaldez, F., & Parra, F. (1979). Dimensio ns of landscape preferences
from pairwise comparisons. In: G.H. Elsner & R.D. Smardon (Eds.). Proceedings of our
national landscape. A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the
visual resource (General Technical Report PSW-35, pp. 256-262). Berkeley, California:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Gooch, G.D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic
States. Environment and Behavior, 27, 513-539.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszcsynski, T. (1997). Terror management
theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Emperical assessments and
conceptual refinements. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology, 29, 61-139. New York: Academic Press.
Hammit, W.E, Patterson, M.E. & Noe, F.P. (1994). Identifying and predicting
visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape and Urban
Planning, 29, 171-183.
Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 25, 17-36.
Hartig, T., & Evans, G.W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experience.
In T. Gärling & R.G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and
geographical approaches (pp. 427-457). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G.W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural
environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Herzog, T. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.
Higgs, E.S. (1997). What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology, 11,
338-348.
Highhouse, S., & Yüce, P. (1996). Perspectives, perceptions, and risk-taking
behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 159-167.
Hodgson, R.W., & Thayer, R.L. (1980). Implied human influence reduces
landscape beauty. Landscape Planning, 7, 171-179.
Hull, R.B., & Bishop, I.D. (1988). Scenic impacts of electricity transmission
towers: The influence of landscape type and observer distance. Journal of Environmental
Management, 27, 99-108.
Hull, R.B., & Revell, G.B. (1989). Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic
beauty evaluations. A case study in Bali. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 177-191.
References
133
Hull, R.B., & Stewart, W.P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty
judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.
Huth, H. (1957). Nature and the American: Three centuries of changing attitudes.
Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press.
Ittelson, W.H. (1973). Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory.
In: W.H. Ittelson (Ed.), Environment and cognition (pp. 1-19). New York: Seminar Press.
Jackson, R.H., Hudman, L.E., & England, J.L. (1978). Assessment of the
environmental impact of high voltage power transmission lines. Journal of Environmental
Management, 6, 153-170.
Jacques, J.L. (1980). Landscape appraisal: The case for a subjective theory. Journal
of Environmental Management, 6, 153-170.
Johnson, A. (1995). The good, the bad and the ugly: Science, aesthetics and
environmental assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 758-766.
Jongman, R.H.G. (1995). Nature conservation planning in Europe: Developing
ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 169-183.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision
making under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In: I. Altman & J.F.
Wohlwill (Eds.). Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research ( Vol.
6, pp. 127-161). New York: Plenum Press.
Kaplan, R. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for
studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning, 12, 161-176.
Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E.J. (1987). Cultural and subcultural comparisons in
preference for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 281-293.
Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E.J. (1988). Familiarity and preference: A cross-cultural
analysis. In: J.L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1983). A model of person-environment compatibility. Environment and
Behavior, 15, 311-332.
Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect and cognition: Environmental preference from
an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3-32.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an
uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological
perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R., & Wendt, J.S. (1972). Rated preference and complexity for
natural and urban visual material. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 354-356.
Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J.F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness
experience. In: I. Altman and J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment:
Advances in theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 163-203). New York: Plenum Press.
Kellert, S.R. (1985). Social and perceptual factors in endangered species
management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 49, 528-536.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In: D. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.,
Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kent, R.L. (1993). Determining scenic quality along highways: A cognitive
approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29, 29-45.
Knopf. R.C. (1983). Recreational needs and behavior in natural settings. In: I.
Altman and J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and
research (Vol. 6, pp. 205-240). New York: Plenum Press.
References
134
Knopf, R.C. (1987). Human behavior, cognition and affect in the natural
environment. In: D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol.
1, pp. 783-825). New York: Wiley.
Knopf, R.C., Peterson, G.L., Leatherberry, E.C. (1983). Needs for recreational river
floating: Relative consistency across settings. Leisure Sciences, 5, 231-255.
Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage
Lamb, R.J., & Purcell, A.T. (1990). Perception of naturalness in landscape and its
relationship to vegetation structure. Landcape and Urban Planning, 19, 333-352.
Levine, D.W. (1994). True scores, error, reliability and unit of analysis in
environment and behavior research. Environment and Behavior, 26, 261-293.
Levine, D.W. (1996). Why choose one level of analysis? And other issues in
multilevel research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 237-255.
Lopes, L.L. (1986). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255-295.
Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H.C. (1965). English landscape tastes. Geographical
Review, 55, 186-222.
Lyons, E. (1983). Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment
and Behavior, 15, 487-511.
Maciá, A. (1979). Visual perception of landscape: Sex and personality differences.
In G.H. Elsner & R.C. Smardon (Eds.), Our National Landscape (USDA Forest Service
General Technical Report PSW-35, pp. 279-285). Berkeley, California: Pacific Southwest
Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Martin, L.L., Seta, J.J., and Crelia, R. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a
function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 755-764.
Maslov, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer, en Visserij (1990). Natuurbeleidsplan
(Nature Policy Plan). The Hague: Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer, en Visserij.
Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management, and Fisheries of The Netherlands
(1996). Nature conservation policy in The Netherlands: Objectives, methods and results.
Report nr. B-16. Wageningen: National Reference Centre for Nature Management.
McClelland, D.C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed
and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
Miller, P.A. (1984). A comparative study of the BLM scenic quality rating
procedure and landscape preference dimensions. Landscape Journal, 3, 123-135.
Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Natuurbeschermingsraad (1993). Natuur tussen de oren: Natuur- en landschapsbeelden en hun rol bij de ontwikkeling en vormgeving van beleid. Utrecht:
Natuurbeschermingsraad (with English summary).
Nuttin, J.M. (1987). Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter
effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 381-402.
Orians, G.H. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human
behavior. In: J.S. Lockard (Ed.), The evolution of human social behavior (pp. 49-66). New
York: Elsevier.
Orland, B. (1988). Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: Some resident and
visitor differences. In: J. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and
applications (pp. 364-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parsons, R. (1995). Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental
aesthetics: conundrum, canärd or curiosity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 227-244.
References
135
Porter, M.V. (1987). The role of spatial quality and familiarity in determining
countryside landscape preferences. Unpublished master's thesis. Seattle: University of
Washington.
Purcell, A.T. (1986). Environmental perception and affect: A schema discrepancy
model. Environment and Behavior, 18, 3-30.
Purcell, A.T. (1987). Landscape perception, preference, and schema discrepancy.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14, 67-92.
Purcell, A.T. (1992). Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of
landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 159-177.
Purcell, A.T., Lamb, R.J., Mainardi Peron, E., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or
preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psycholo gy, 14, 195-209.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal
structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
Rodman, J. (1983). Four forms of ecological consciousness reconsidered. In: D.
Scherer & T. Attig (Eds.), Ethics and the environment. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Ruiz, M., & Ruiz, J.P. (1989). Landscape perception and technological change in
the central mountains of Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 18, 1-15.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and memory. London: HarperCollins.
Schroeder, H.W. (1983). Variations in the perception of urban forest recreation
sites. Leisure Sciences, 5, 221-230.
Schwarz, N., Wänke, M., & Bless, H. (1994). Subjective assessments and
evaluations of change: Some lessons from social cognition research. In: W. Stroebe & M.
Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp.181-210). New York:
Wiley.
Scott, D., & Willits, F.K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A
Pennsylvania study. Environment and Behavior, 26, 239-260.
Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Learned helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.
Sell, J.L., & Zube, E.H. (1986). Perception of and response to environmental
change. Journal of Architectu ral and Planning Research, 3, 33-54.
Shafer, E.L., & Tooby, M. (1973). Landscape preferences: An international
replication. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 197-197
Sheets, V.L., & Manzer, C.D. (1991). Affect, cognition and urban vegetation.
Environment and Behavior, 3, 285-304.
Shuttleworth, S. (1981). Landscape appraisal: The "objective/subjective" debate.
Landscape Research, 6, 33.
Shuttleworth, S. (1984). Consensus and the perception of landscape quality.
Landscape Research, 9, 17-22.
Simpson, C.J., Rosenthal, T.L., Daniel, T.C., & White, G.M. (1976). Socialinfluence variations in evaluating managed and unmanaged forest areas. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 61, 759-763.
Smardon, R.C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review
of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 85-106.
Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models.
Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 342-363.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. & Pyszczynski (1991). A terror management theory of
social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews.
Advances in Experimental Social Psycholo gy, 24, 93-159.
References
136
Sonnenfeld, J. (1967). Environment perception and adaptation level in the Arctic.
In: D. Lowenthal (Ed.), Environmental perception and behavior (pp. 42-59). Chicago:
University of Chicago.
Staats, H.J. (1991). Directions in environmental preference research: Time,
categories and the real world. Paper presented at the third Spanish Environmental
Psychology Meeting, Sevilla.
Staats, H., & Van de Wardt, J.W. (1990). Changing a small-scale landscape:
Environmental psychology applied to the problems of the countryside. Netherlands Journal of
Housing and Environmental Research, 5, 65-86.
Stamps, A.E. (1996). People and places: Variance components of environmental
preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 323-334.
Stankey, G.H., & Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors
affecting visitor behavior: A state-of-knowledge review. In R.C. Lucas (Ed.), Proceedings National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions
(General Technical Report INT-220, pp. 246-293). Ogden, UT: United Stated Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
Strumse, E. (1994). Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual
preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 14, 293-303.
Strumse, E. (1996). Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian
landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 1-15.
Swart, J.A.A., Van der Windt, H.J., & Keulartz, J. (1998). Societal aspects of
ecological restoration. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Restaration
Ecology, 25-30 August, Groningen.
Tesser, A., & Martin, L. (1996). The psychology of evaluation. In: E.T. Higgins &
A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 400-431).
Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world: changing attitudes in England
1500-1800. London: Allen Lane.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the
uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58,
17-67.
Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and
values. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Ullrich, J.R., & Ullrich, M.F. (1976). A multidimensional scaling analysis of
perceived similarities of rivers in western Montana. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 575-584.
Ulrich, S.R. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape
Research, 4, 17-23.
Ulrich, S.R.(1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects.
Environment and Behavior, 13, 523-556.
Ulrich, R.S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: I.
Altman and J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and
research (Vol. 6, pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum Press.
Ulrich, S.R. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.
Ulrich, S.R. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In: Kellert, S.R.,
& Wilson, E.O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island press.
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., & Zelson, M.
(1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
Van den Berg, A.E. (1995a). De waargenomen kwaliteit van landschapsveranderingen: Theoretisch en experimenteel onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden van een model
References
137
voor het verklaren en voorspellen van de waargenomen kwaliteit van natuurontwikkelingsmaatregelen. Wageningen, DLO-Staring Centrum, Rapport 409.
Van den Berg, A.E. (1995b). Een goed initiatief, maar niet in onze wijk! Een
veldonderzoek naar de attitude ten aanzien van methadon-verstrekking en de effekten van
overredende communicatie In: B. Van der Moolen & H. Voogd (Eds.), Niet in mijn
achtertuin, maar waar dan? Het Nimby-verschijnsel in de ruimtelijke planning. Alphen aan
den Rijn: Samson Tjeenk Willink.
Van den Berg, A.E. (1998). Predicting revealed preferences from GIS-based
measures of landscape variety. In J. Teklenburg, J. Van Andel, J. Smeets, & A. Seidel (Eds.),
Shifting Balances: Changing Roles in Policy, Research, and Design (pp. 177-186).
Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Association for People-Environment
Studies (IAPS). Eindhoven: Eirass.
Van den Berg, A.E., Coeterier, J.F., & Vlek, C.A.J. (1996). Hoe mooi is ruige
natuur? Verschillen tussen gebruikers in de waardering van landschapskenmerken bij
natuurontwikkeling. Landschap, 13, 285-297.
Van den Berg, A.E., De Vries, D.H., & Vlek, C.A.J. (1998). Nature images,
environmental beliefs and group differences in perceived landscape beauty. Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Van den Berg, A.E., & Koole, S.L. (1999). Effects of mortality salience on
landscape preferences. Manuscript in preparation.
Van den Berg, A.E., & Vlek, C.A.J. (1998). The Influence of planned-change
context on the evaluation of natural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, 1-10.
Van den Berg, A.E., Vlek, C.A.J., & Coeterier, J.F. (1998). Group differences in the
aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 18, 141-157.
Van den Berg, A.E., Vlek, C.A.J., & Koole, S.L. (1999). Interindividual variation in
the evaluation of natural landscapes: Sociodemographic correlates and motivational bases.
Manuscript submitted for publication.
Van der Windt, H.J. (1995). En dan: Wat is natuur nog in dit land? Natuurbescherming in Nederland 1880-1990. Meppel: Boom.
Vlek, C.A.J., & Stallen, P.J. (1981). Judging risks and benefits in the small and in
the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235-271.
Vogel, S. (1996). Farmers' environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and
Behavior, 28, 591-613.
Wade, G. (1982). The relationship between landscape preference and looking time:
A methodological investigation. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 217-222.
Ward, L.M., & Russel, J.A. (1981). The psychological representation of molar
physical environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 121-152.
Wellman, J.D., & Buyhoff, G.J. (1980). Effects of regional familiarity on landscape
preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 105-110.
Willis, K.G., & Garrod, G.D. (1992). Assessing the value of future landscapes.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 23, 17-32.
Winkel, G.H. (1981). The perception of neighborhood change. In J.H. Harvey,
(Ed.). Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
associates.
Wohlwill, J.F. (1983). The concept of nature: A psychologist's view. In: I. Altman
and J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and
research (Vol. 6, pp. 5-37). New York: Plenum Press.
Wolsink, M. (1994). Entanglement of interests and motives: Assumptions behind
the NIMBY-theory on facility siting. Urban Studies, 31, 851-866.
References
138
Woodhouse, G. (1995). A guide to MLn for new users. London: University of
London, Institute of Education.
Wyant, J.G., Meganck, R.A., & Ham, S.H. (1995). A planning and decision-making
framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management, 19, 789-796.
Yates, J.F. (1992). Risk-taking behaviour. New York: Wiley.
Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: Comparisons among
Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 107126.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123.
Zube, E.H. (1974). Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description
and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior, 6, 69-89.
Zube, E.H. (1984). Themes in landscape assessment theory. Landscape Journal, 3,
104-110.
Zube, E.H. (1987). Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape
Ecology, 1, 37-45.
Zube, E.H., & Pitt, D.G. (1981). Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage
landscapes. Landscape Planning, 8, 69-87.
Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G., & Anderson, T.W. (1975). Perception and prediction of
scenic resource values of the northeast. In: E.H. Zube, R.O. Brush & J.G. Fabos (Eds.),
Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions, and resources (pp. 151-167). Stroudsburg, Pa.:
Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L. & Taylor, J.G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research,
application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33.
Zube, E.H., Simcox, D.E. & Law, C.S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations:
History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6, 62-80.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation-seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zuckerman, M., Ulrich, R.S., & McLaughlin, J. (1993). Sensation seeking and
affective reactions to nature paintings. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 563-576.