FERC Enforcement Report Emphasizes Internal Compliance

MARCH 2015
VOL. 15-3
PRATT’S Energy Law Report
P RA T T ’ s
Energy Law
R ep o rt
EDITOR’S NOTE: CHALLENGING FRACKING
BANS
Victoria Prussen Spears
AB 1103 MANDATORY ENERGY DISCLOSURES
FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Jane M. Samson
MORA COUNTY AND DENTON:
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING BANS
Samuel Boxerman, Joel Visser, and Ben Tannen
IN THE COURTS
Steven A. Meyerowitz
DRILLING DOWN: A DEEPER LOOK INTO THE
DISTRESSED OIL & GAS INDUSTRY – PART I
Charles M. Persons
MARCH 2015
TOP 10 PITFALLS IN EPC CONTRACTS
Seth Ginther, Roderick W. Simmons, and Angela
M. Carrico Stevens
vol.15-3
FERC ENFORCEMENT REPORT EMPHASIZES
INTERNAL COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES,
SELF-REPORTING, AND IMPORTANCE OF
COOPERATION
Doron F. Ezickson, Greg Kusel, Gregory K.
Lawrence, and Christopher J. Polito
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY UPDATE
Steven A. Meyerowitz
INDUSTRY NEWS
Victoria Prussen Spears
0002
[ST: 1] [ED: m] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:35 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 FM000150 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [FM000150-Local:09 Sep 14 16:11][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-fmvol015]
40
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION?
For questions about the Editorial Content appearing in these volumes or reprint permission, please call:
Jeff Slutzky, J.D. at ......................................................................... 1-800-306-5230 Ext. 6733388
Email: ................................................................................................... jeffrey.slutzky@lexisnexis.com
For assistance with replacement pages, shipments, billing or other customer service matters, please call:
Customer Services Department at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (800) 833-9844
Outside the United States and Canada, please call . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (518) 487-3000
Fax Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (518) 487-3584
Customer Service Web site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://www.lexisnexis.com/custserv/
For information on other Matthew Bender publications, please call
Your account manager or . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (800) 223-1940
Outside the United States and Canada, please call . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (518) 487-3000
ISBN: 978-1-6328-0836-3 (print)
ISBN: 978-1-6328-0837-0 (eBook)
Cite this publication as:
[author name], [article title], [vol. no.] PRATT’S ENERGY LAW REPORT [page number] (LexisNexis A.S.
Pratt);
Ian Coles, Rare Earth Elements: Deep Sea Mining and the Law of the Sea, 14 PRATT’S ENERGY LAW REPORT
4 (LexisNexis A.S. Pratt)
This publication is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or
other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent
professional should be sought.
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under
license. A.S. Pratt is a trademark of Reed Elsevier Properties SA, used under license.
Copyright © 2015 Reed Elsevier Properties SA, used under license by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
No copyright is claimed by LexisNexis, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., or Reed Elsevier Properties SA, in the
text of statutes, regulations, and excerpts from court opinions quoted within this work. Permission to copy material
may be licensed for a fee from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Mass. 01923,
telephone (978) 750-8400.
An A.S. Pratt™ Publication
Editorial Offices
630 Central Ave., New Providence, NJ 07974 (908) 464-6800
201 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94105-1831 (415) 908-3200
www.lexisnexis.com
(2015–Pub.1898)
0003
[ST: 1] [ED: m] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:35 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 FM000150 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [FM000150-Local:09 Sep 14 16:11][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-fmvol015]
44
Editor-in-Chief, Editor & Board of
Editors
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
STEVEN A. MEYEROWITZ
President, Meyerowitz Communications Inc.
EDITOR
VICTORIA PRUSSEN SPEARS
Senior Vice President, Meyerowitz Communications Inc.
BOARD OF EDITORS
SAMUEL B. BOXERMAN
Partner, Sidley Austin LLP
ANDREW CALDER
Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
M. SETH GINTHER
Partner, Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.
R. TODD JOHNSON
Partner, Jones Day
BARCLAY NICHOLSON
Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright
BRADLEY A. WALKER
Counsel, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
ELAINE M. WALSH
Partner, Baker Botts L.L.P.
SEAN T. WHEELER
Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP
WANDA B. WHIGHAM
Senior Counsel, Holland & Knight LLP
Pratt’s Energy Law Report is published 10 times a year by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Periodicals Postage Paid at Washington, D.C., and at additional mailing offices. Copyright 2015 Reed
Elsevier Properties SA, used under license by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. No part of this journal
may be reproduced in any form—by microfilm, xerography, or otherwise—or incorporated into any
information retrieval system without the written permission of the copyright owner. For customer
support, please contact LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 1275 Broadway, Albany, NY 12204 or e-mail
Customer.Support@lexisnexis.com. Direct any editorial inquires and send any material for publication
to Steven A. Meyerowitz, Editor-in-Chief, Meyerowitz Communications Inc., PO Box 7080, Miller
Place, NY 11764, smeyerow@optonline.net, 631.331.3908, or Victoria Prussen Spears, Editor,
Meyerowitz Communications Inc., PO Box 7080 Miller Place, NY 11764, vpspears@optonline.net,
516.578.5170. Material for publication is welcomed—articles, decisions, or other items of interest to
lawyers and law firms, in-house energy counsel, government lawyers, senior business executives, and
iii
0004
[ST: 1] [ED: m] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:35 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 FM000150 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [FM000150-Local:09 Sep 14 16:11][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-fmvol015]
10
Editor-in-Chief, Editor & Board of Editors
anyone interested in energy-related environmental preservation, the laws governing cutting-edge
alternative energy technologies, and legal developments affecting traditional and new energy providers.
This publication is designed to be accurate and authoritative, but neither the publisher nor the authors
are rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services in this publication. If legal or other expert
advice is desired, retain the services of an appropriate professional. The articles and columns reflect only
the present considerations and views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the firms or
organizations with which they are affiliated, any of the former or present clients of the authors or their
firms or organizations, or the editors or publisher.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Pratt’s Energy Law Report, LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 121
Chanlon Road, North Building, New Providence, NJ 07974.
iv
0029
[ST: 107] [ED: 100000] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:48 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 SC_00052 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [SC_00052-Local:23 Feb 15 11:30][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-ch1503]
0
FERC ENFORCEMENT REPORT EMPHASIZES INTERNAL COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES
FERC Enforcement Report Emphasizes Internal
Compliance Procedures, Self-Reporting, and
Importance of Cooperation
By Doron F. Ezickson, Greg Kusel, Gregory K. Lawrence, and Christopher J.
Polito*
The authors of this article summarize the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Report on Enforcement.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) Office of Enforcement
(“Enforcement”) 2014 Report on Enforcement (“Report”),1 issued on November 20,
2014, provides an overview of and statistics regarding FERC’s enforcement activities
during the fiscal year 2014 within Enforcement’s four divisions:
•
Investigations;
•
Audits and Accounting;
•
Energy Market Oversight; and
•
Analytics and Surveillance.
The Report provides information regarding Enforcement’s non-public activities and
priorities during the fiscal year 2014. The 2014 Report emphasizes the value FERC
Enforcement places on self-reporting and internal compliance procedures.
The Report first identifies Enforcement’s continued priorities:
•
Fraud and market manipulation;
•
Serious violations of the Commission’s reliability standards;
•
Anticompetitive conduct; and
•
Conduct that threatens the transparency of regulated markets.
According to the Report, Enforcement does not plan to change these priorities in
the coming year. The Report highlights significant matters and statistics regarding
each of Enforcement’s four divisions.
DIVISION OF INVESTIGATIONS
The Division of Investigations conducts both public and non-public investigations
*
Doron F. Ezickson is a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, where his energy and
commodities practice involves U.S. and EU regulatory and compliance issues. Greg Kusel is a law clerk
at the firm advising clients about energy-related matters with a focus on natural gas and pipelines.
Gregory K. Lawrence, a partner at the firm, concentrates his practice on the electricity and natural gas
industries. Christopher J. Polito, an associate at the firm, represents energy and commodity companies,
financial institutions, and trade associations. The authors may be contacted at
doron.ezickson@cwt.com,
greg.kusel@cwt.com,
greg.lawrence@cwt.com,
and
christopher.polito@cwt.com, respectively.
1
http://ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2014/11-20-14-enforcement.pdf.
135
0030
[ST: 107] [ED: 100000] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:48 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 SC_00052 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [SC_00052-Local:23 Feb 15 11:30][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-ch1503]
0
PRATT’S ENERGY LAW REPORT
of possible violations of the statutes, rules and regulations administered by FERC.
The Report summarizes a number of significant matters in 2014, including FERC’s
settlement of an investigation of a self-reported violation of FERC’s AntiManipulation Rule,2 the first self-report of this kind to result in a FERC-approved
settlement.
Direct Energy Settlement
The self-report was filed by Direct Energy Services, LLC (“Direct Energy”) after its
outside counsel gave a compliance training presentation to Direct Energy’s traders
regarding FERC’s Anti-Manipulation Rule. One of Direct Energy’s traders reported
concerns after recognizing similarities between the trading activities discussed in the
compliance training presentation and strategies that were being used by Direct
Energy traders involving unusual natural gas trading at Transco Zone 6. At nearly the
same time, Direct Energy’s back-room operations recognized a problem with certain
trading. Direct Energy immediately commenced an internal investigation, which
eventually led to a self-report to FERC (as highlighted in the settlement) describing
unusual natural gas trading at Transco Zone 6 where large volumes of next-day gas
were bought at index and sold at a lower, fixed price resulting in losses and, in turn,
a lower Gas Daily index price that benefited financial positions settling at that index
held by Direct Energy. The two traders involved were terminated. As a result, Direct
Energy settled with FERC for a civil penalty of $20,000, disgorgement of $31,935,
and agreed to provide at least one monitoring report to Enforcement. The settlement
indicated that Direct Energy “fully and comprehensively” cooperated. The Report
stated that Direct Energy received a relatively small civil penalty and disgorgement
payments due to its self-reporting, strong compliance program (the settlement
emphasizes compliance training and daily data analysis), quick action, and full
cooperation with Enforcement’s investigation.
Additional Settlements
FERC also approved 8 settlements amounting to almost $25 million in civil
penalties, approximately $4 million plus interest in disgorgement, and $1.7 million
in public safety enhancements. These settlements involved a variety of matters,
including Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”) violations, violations of
reliability standards, violations of hydro power safety regulations, violations of FERC
regulations regarding filings and facility merger/consolidation authorization, violations of prohibitions on submission of inaccurate information, and violations of
FERC’s regulations prohibiting manipulation in natural gas and electric markets.
Self-Reports Received and Closed
The Report summarizes the 73 self-reports received by Enforcement. Enforcement
received 73 self-reports in the reporting period. Enforcement closed 70 self-reports in
fiscal year 2014, some of which were still pending from 2009 and 2011, and it had
40 self-reports still pending. Enforcement received self-reports regarding a number of
2
18 C.F.R. § 1c.1 (2014).
136
0031
[ST: 107] [ED: 100000] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:48 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 SC_00052 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [SC_00052-Local:23 Feb 15 11:30][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-ch1503]
0
FERC ENFORCEMENT REPORT EMPHASIZES INTERNAL COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES
matters. The largest category was for Tariff/OATT violations. Enforcement also
received a number of self-reports regarding Regional Transmission Organizations and
Independent System Operators (“RTO/ISO”) violations. Enforcement closed only
one self-report related to market manipulation, as contrasted with 21 self-reports
related to Tariff/OATT violations and 12 related to RTO/ISO violations.
As part of Enforcement’s effort to promote transparency and encourage compliance, the Report lists a number of illustrative self-reports closed with no action. The
Report provides some insights into why Enforcement chose not to pursue enforcement actions in particular instances, including:
•
The conduct resulted in no or minimal harm to the market or other market
participants;
•
The entity took remedial measures to correct market harm;
•
The entity implemented compliance measures to prevent future violations;
•
The violation was unintentional;
•
The entity promptly submitted a self-report; and
•
The entity received little or no benefit from the violation.
New Investigations
The Division of Investigations opened 17 investigations in 2014, down from 24
investigations the year prior. The opened investigations involve multiple different
types of potential violations, including:
•
market manipulation (nine investigations);
•
false statements to FERC or an RTO/ISO (eight investigations);
•
tariff violations (11 investigations); and
•
FERC accounting standards and orders (one investigation).
RTO/ISO market monitors and the Division of Analytics and Surveillance (“DAS”)
referrals continue to be a key referral source, as over half of FERC’s new investigations
opened this year came through DAS or market monitors. In 2014, Enforcement
converted no Hotline calls to preliminary investigations, although multiple 2014 calls
concerned conduct in investigations that were already pending.
Closed Investigations
Enforcement closed seven investigations because it found no violation or did not
have sufficient evidence. The Report provides several examples of investigations to
provide guidance regarding why Enforcement chose to close these matters with no
action:
•
The evidence did not support a violation;
•
The entity took immediate remedial measures;
•
The conduct was for a legitimate purpose (e.g., reliability or economic
fundamentals);
137
0032
[ST: 107] [ED: 100000] [REL: 15-3]
Composed: Wed Feb 25 10:55:48 EST 2015
XPP 8.4C.1 SP #3 SC_00052 nllp 1898 [PW=468pt PD=702pt TW=360pt TD=580pt]
VER: [SC_00052-Local:23 Feb 15 11:30][MX-SECNDARY: 27 Jan 15 09:08][TT-: 23 Sep 11 07:01 loc=usa unit=01898-ch1503]
0
PRATT’S ENERGY LAW REPORT
•
The entity promptly submitted a self-report; and
•
The conduct occurred in an isolated trading period.
DIVISION OF AUDITS AND ACCOUNTING
The Division of Audits and Accounting operates FERC’s audit program and
administers FERC’s accounting regulations. According to the Report, the Division of
Audits and Accounting completed 19 financial and operational audits. The audits
resulted in 162 recommendations for corrective action and directed refunds and
recoveries totaling over $11.7 million. These audits covered market-based rate
authority and electric quarterly reports (“EQRs”), formula rates, transmission
incentives, accounting and reporting, capacity markets and demand response, OATT
provisions, allowance for funds used during construction (“AFUDC”), mergers and
acquisitions, and nuclear decommissioning trust funds. The Report also highlights
areas where the Division of Audits and Accounting has found consistent patterns of
noncompliance, including in formula rate matters, consolidations, nuclear decommissioning trust funds, AFUDC, OATT provisions, transmission and distribution,
untimely filing of reports, record retention, and demand response/energy efficiency.
DIVISION OF ENERGY MARKET OVERSIGHT
The Division of Energy Market Oversight handles monitoring and oversight of
wholesale natural gas and electric power markets. It continued its roles of market
monitoring, technical analysis and investigation support, outreach, forms administration and filing compliance, and rulemaking oversight. Notably, the Division of
Market Oversight reviewed nearly 9,000 EQR submittals from over 1,900 individual
respondents. The division also supported FERC’s ongoing gas-electric coordination
initiative which led to FERC’s ongoing Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Docket
No. RM14-2-000, comments were due by November 28, 2014.
DIVISION OF ANALYTICS AND SURVEILLANCE
DAS conducts surveillance and analyzes market data to detect potential market
manipulation, anticompetitive conduct, and other anomalous trading activities in the
energy markets. In 2014, FERC continued to enhance its ability to conduct
surveillance of gas and electric markets and to analyze individual market participant
behavior by gaining access to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Large
Trader Report data. This data allows the division to evaluate market participants’
financial incentives—e.g., holding a financial position—as it looks for wrongdoing.
DAS uses electronic tags (e-Tags) from Order No. 771, Large Trader Reports, and
data from RTOs/ISOs under Order No. 760 to improve its surveillance capabilities.
DAS also uses screens extensively to detect wrongdoing. DAS worked on more than
30 investigations this year.
138