Public attitudes to quantum technology Version 2.0 May 2014 Public attitudes to quantum technology Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 2 Public views................................................................................................................ 4 3 Analysis of views ....................................................................................................... 6 4 Gap analysis ............................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 1: summary of sources of information ............................................................. 8 Appendix 2: Google scholar searches on ‘public opinion’ together with following search-terms: .....................................................................................................................16 i Public attitudes to quantum technology This report is a review of information on the views and values of the public on quantum technology available at time of writing, April 2014. It provides a snapshot of public views and is a live document, open to comments and additions. The report will be useful to those interested in the public’s views on new and emerging areas of science and technology and is particularly targeted to assist those involved in policy involving science and technology as they provide a background to what is already known about public views. It is worth noting that this report focuses on a high-level account of public views summarised across various different engagement methodologies. It does not intend to capture the nuances or reasoning behind those methodologies. The views and values of the public will change and new information will become available. Hence, we welcome your views, insights or comments. • Do you know of further evidence which we should include? • Do you have any comments or suggestions to improve the report? You can comment here. This report, and the others in the series, has been produced by Sciencewise. Sciencewise is a BIS funded programme to encourage the more widespread use of public dialogue in policy involving science and technology. Sciencewise provides advice and guidance to help those involved in the development of policy to understand and to take into account the views and values of the public in the development of policy involving science and technology. Sciencewise is able to provide: Advice and guidance on public dialogue and engagement Assistance with the implementation of engagement as appropriate Financial support for the implementation of selected public dialogue projects Training and mentoring to assist those involved in policy development to build their understanding of the benefits and their confidence around engagement with the public. ii Public attitudes to quantum technology 1 Executive Summary Quantum technologies harness the effects of quantum physics in order to gain abilities and functions that are otherwise impossible with conventional techniques. Most of the technologies are still in relatively early research stages with some time until the technology comes to market. The quantum technologies considered within this report are: quantum secure communications, quantum sensors, quantum metrology, quantum simulators and quantum computing. Despite an extensive web search, there seems to be no evidence of the views of the public on this topic. Whilst there are examples of engagement with the public to inform and to educate, there are no examples where the views and values of the public have been gathered and reported. Therefore, in order to capture the zeitgeist relating to public opinion around quantum technologies, a study has been made of mainstream and online media reportage to determine what is being said around this topic. Summary of findings: There are no data on public opinion from either Eurobarometer or other surveys, and the media (newspaper, blogs, websites) reportage about quantum technology is not particularly widespread. There is no evidence of deliberative dialogue or work in the public engagement/science communication sphere on public attitudes to quantum technologies. Thus, our understanding of public opinion has been shaped by mainstream media reportage of the topic. In the media “Quantum computing and secure communications are both semi-permanently ‘on the horizon’”. When the topic first appeared in the media (in the early 2000s), it was reported as an exciting new technology that had yet to be developed, a situation that apparently continues fourteen years later. There are examples of both frustrations that the technology hasn’t yet appeared and optimism about what may happen in the near future. This persists despite the improvements made in the technology that underpins quantum computing and communications which is underplayed in the media. Reporting of the uses for quantum computing and secure communications focus on their probable applications in decryption and the implications this is likely to have for financial systems and national security. Although they never quite go away, security concerns came back into prominent focus in early 2014, when the US National Security Agency (NSA) was revealed to be building a quantum computer. Quantum technology is acknowledged to be an extremely difficult topic to understand and explain; blog posts that set out to explain it note that it is almost impossible to describe in simple terms. It is also difficult to indisputably demonstrate: there is a strong strand of discussion from experts and researchers on whether the only commercially available quantum computer is actually harnessing quantum effects and how effective the technology is, which indicates the complexity of the technology being discussed. There is also evidence of conditional acceptance of the emerging technologies with a spread of views as outlined above, particularly regarding the less-widely-reported technologies (metrology, sensors and simulations). Need for dialogue? Given the lack of available evidence about public attitudes to quantum technology, there are likely to be benefits from understanding the views of the public with this area and to do some exploration of attitudes and values relating to this and connected topics. This is very timely considering the announcement of £270m over the next five years and increasing coverage of these technologies in the media. The future EPSRC Quantum Technology Hubs have a commitment to responsible innovation that includes two-way dialogue and strengthens the argument for deliberative dialogue around the applications of quantum technology. A future public dialogue relating to quantum technologies might want to consider the following as a starting point: “What are the issues that quantum technology (and its applications) raise?” 1 Public attitudes to quantum technology Introduction What are quantum technologies? The EPSRC National Network of Quantum Technology Hubs Call document defines quantum technologies as: “...those that harness quantum physics [such as superposition and entanglement] to gain a functionality or performance which is otherwise unattainable. Although many current and future technologies are described by quantum theory, the focus of this call is on the direct exploitation of quantum phenomena such as superposition or entanglement to enable disruptive impacts in security, precision, sensitivity, accuracy or speed.” And via stakeholder engagement, five sub-areas of quantum technologies have been identified: Quantum Secure Communications: As the secrecy of quantum communications can be measured directly, they have inherent potential for distributing secure digital keys on networks. Quantum key distribution is widely regarded as one of the first quantum information technologies with commercial applications. Working systems already exist and are applied to niche applications. The opportunity now is to realise the breakthrough in affordability and secure network integration that will enable widespread use of the technology. Next generation quantum communication technologies will be based on distributed quantum entanglement. This can be used to create quantum networks that implement more advanced protocols, such as quantum-secure database queries or distributed quantum information processing. Here the emphasis should be on the realisation of scalable network architectures, low-cost solid-state sources of quantum entanglement alongside the creation of new secure protocols and applications. Quantum Metrology: Measurement underpins commerce; the definition of standards for trade and industry is the basis for a thriving economy. Next generation metrology capabilities will be based on quantum phenomena, and will deliver new standards for time, frequency, mass, length, charge and other key fundamental measures. These will have immediate important applications, such as miniaturised, robust, atomic clocks that can act as "fly-wheels" for GPS. These will enable better standards for rapid electronic stock trading, for instance, as well as new navigation opportunities. Further, new measurement methods and devices derived from quantum metrology approaches and new methods for certification of such techniques and instruments, will enable validation of other quantum technologies, such as detectors for quantum sensors and register readout measurements for quantum computers. Super-accurate measurement of time is required to manage and route the exploding volume of traffic using mobile phone and other communications systems. Quantum Sensors: Sensors are now ubiquitous, but are often limited by their precision, size and efficiency. Quantum sensing technologies harnesses the advantage given by quantum systems to provide measurement precision beyond conventional methods. This approach will enable sensors to be deployed that can detect at the single molecule level; that can sense electromagnetic and gravitational fields with unprecedented accuracy. These sensors will provide new paradigms for healthcare and medical imaging technologies; security and environmental monitoring; and manufacturing of high value materials. Another possible application for this technology is to increase the performance of subterranean mapping to search for valuable resources such as gas, oil and minerals. There may be other, unknown, possibilities for quantum sensors such as in robotics and novel instrumentation. Quantum Simulators: The modelling of real molecules or materials at the atomic scale is key to technological problems ranging from the interaction of drug molecules with their targets, to the nature of high-temperature superconductivity. This approach relies on modelling quantum phenomena at the chemical scale and is very difficult using purely classical computers, 2 Public attitudes to quantum technology because the effort required to achieve an accurate result scales very rapidly (in fact exponentially) with the size of the system. In the long term a full quantum computer could perform this simulation exponentially more quickly on any target quantum system. However in the shorter term significant gains could be made by engineering well-controlled quantum systems whose behaviour mimics the specific system under study, either in an analogue fashion or through a digital simulation. Promising quantum systems to use as the 'mimic' include trapped atoms, ions or molecules, multiple photons interacting via linear optics, superconducting circuits, or electron spins in solids. Quantum Computation: Quantum physics offers the possibility of a computing engine capable of solving problems that are completely intractable on current and future generation conventional hardware. The hardware required to build such a computer would also deliver revolutionary capabilities for other quantum technologies. Quantum computation encompasses all elements of the field, from foundational studies of the generation, manipulation and utilisation of entanglement and other quantum correlations, to development of hardware and components with the properties needed for fabricating a true quantum computer. Context: £270m spending on quantum technology In the 2013 Autumn Statement, the UK Government announced an investment of £270m over the next five years in Quantum Technologies, with the aim to develop commercial applications of this technology. The science minister has informally dubbed quantum technology as the ninth of the Eight Great Technologies (which have been explored in other social intelligence reports) due to the increased interest in this area since the original Eight Great Technologies report was published in 2013 after the statement made by the Chancellor to the Royal Society in 2012. Scope of this report Due to the novelty of these technologies and the current status of development, initial scoping of this area indicates that the evidence of public views relating to quantum technology may be limited to articles in mainstream media about the basic concepts rather than the social impacts or ethical issues about the technologies. Scoping also indicates that there are public engagement initiatives around this area. However blogs (and other social media) are limited to researchers and research groups working on this, and there is no evidence of research, surveys or dialogue with the public in order to understand views and values of this emerging technology. Therefore, this social intelligence report, at this time, focuses on how the topics are represented in the media and, if at all possible, includes more “direct” reportage of public views (such as primary sources like blogs, social media or market research). If a future governmental report (such as the chapters for the other Great Eight Technologies) is in production, this may help to guide the direction for the social intelligence report and help to shape the gap analysis in understanding public views in the future. 3 Public attitudes to quantum technology 2 Public views The views of the public summarised below were identified using the sources detailed in Appendix 1. The main sources of public views were put together through online research and focussed on the last 10 years of media reportage. Publicly-available information about quantum technology is restricted to newspaper/media reports, websites and blogs. There are no data on public opinion from either Eurobarometer or other surveys. This research does not cover the more traditional ‘transmitting’ modes of science communication such as public lectures, popular science books unless these include elements of receiving public views where these are captured and reported. For a list of search terms used to find sources of data, please see Appendix 2. Reportage on quantum technology can be divided into four themes: 1 ‘It’s coming …’ – quantum technology on the horizon This is often observed especially in articles about quantum computing and quantum secure st communications. In the early 21 Century (2001–2010) quantum computing is reported in newspapers as a technology that is on the horizon, about to make the transition ‘from science fiction to science fact’. Reports on quantum computing describe its potential as wide-ranging; it could model complex processes and answer unsolvable problems (e.g. Belfast Newsletter, June 2002) and perform calculations that would take conventional computers millions of years (e.g. Daily Telegraph, July 2008). However, the technology’s major promise – and the major threat it poses – lies in its potential to ‘effortlessly crack modern encryption’ (e.g. Independent, January 2005). This is noted as a particular threat to complex systems such as banking, finance and national security. It is reported that considerable obstacles lie in the path of a viable quantum computer (e.g. Guardian, July 2005) and that fundamental problems remain unsolved (e.g. Daily Telegraph, December 2010). A related theme that emerges is a sense of losing faith in a useful technology ever arriving – “heard it all before”. Readers’ comments relating to technologies such as quantum secure communications and computing often express a sense of frustration that the technology will never arrive in their lifetimes (despite predictions made in the past) but there is also a sense of optimism about the possible applications of new technologies in the future. Whilst extensive work has been done to develop the technology that underpins quantum computing, this does not seem to be reported in the media. 2 ‘It’s impossible to understand…’ – the complexity of quantum physics Quantum physics is a notoriously difficult concept to explain and this seems to extend to the technology that exploits these effects. Metro (December 2012) wrote that quantum computing ‘will give you a migraine trying to get your head round it’. Echoing Richard Feynmann’s quip that if you claimed to understand quantum mechanics you didn’t understand quantum mechanics, Michael Nielsen’s blog post argued that there is no possible simple explanation of how quantum computers work. There were several comments on this post but they were largely from engineers and physicists, focussing on the viability of simulations and the minutiæ of Nielsen’s (non)explanation. Quantum secure communications are described in one blog as “mind-bendingly sophisticated” (12 June 2007) and a comment in the same blog refers to “quantum magic”. 3 It’s an investment but is it actually quantum…? Another recurring theme in the articles is the difficulty in actually proving that a technology works and uses quantum effects to produce their results. This could be due to the underlying sophistication that, as outlined above, is so difficult to explain easily. Again, this seems to mostly emerge in articles about quantum computing and secure communications. In 2007, a Canadian company, D-Wave, claimed to have built the world’s first quantum computer (e.g. Guardian, February 2007). This created speculation whether quantum computers will supersede conventional computers (e.g. Daily Telegraph, July 2008). 4 Public attitudes to quantum technology In early 2013, there was a wave of reportage following Google and NASA’s decision to join a consortium (including several universities) to research applications of quantum computing in artificial intelligence, encryption/decryption and planning (e.g. MIT Technology Review, May 2013). The consortium had purchased (at a cost of around $15 million) one of D-Wave’s computers; a strand of comment – particularly in researchers’ blogs – discussed whether this machine was truly a quantum computer or an extremely sophisticated simulation on a classic computer (e.g. BBC Online, May 2013). This discussion continued through 2013; Lauren Orsini’s blog post (December 2013), which was widely promulgated via Twitter, focussed on scientists’ concerns about whether the computer was actually harnessing quantum mechanics, a discussion which re-emerged in January 2014 with the publication of a study expressing doubts over the benefits of quantum over conventional computing. The D-Wave machine has been described by commenters on this report as a ‘stepping stone to a full quantum computer’. Later in 2013, the UK government announced government funding for a number of projects that included quantum technologies (e.g. City AM, December 2013); media reporting linked this announcement to the then recently-discovered Higgs boson, as one of the hubs was named in honour of Peter Higgs. 4 It means ‘they’ will be able to read all our emails – quantum decryption becoming a reality? Concerns about quantum technology’s applications in decryption and personal privacy resurfaced in early 2014, when it was reported that leaked US government documents showed the US National Security Agency (NSA) was building a quantum computer (e.g. Washington Post, January 2014). In media reporting, this was primarily linked to current government, activist and political concerns around privacy and security but also to the difficulties of designing and creating a quantum computer. Once again, a working computer was noted as still being some distance in the future and the difficulties of understanding how quantum computing works were again discussed (e.g. BBC Online, January 2014). 5 Conditional acceptance The media reporting of quantum technologies has proposed public views which are typical arguments around conditional acceptance of emerging technology. These views reported on quantum technology are relevant to all the technology areas and include: Concerns regarding benefits vs. risks of technology (e.g. Comment 2, Telegraph article, 9 March 2014) Awareness of industry and business involvement in developing the technologies (e.g. CBR article, 3 September 2012) A focus on the technology answering specific societal needs (e.g. Guardian article, 17 March 2005) A preference for incremental solutions for addressing needs Technology in itself is not a solution to complicated social and environmental problems (e.g. Wired.com article, 22 March 2010) Technology needs to be good value for money Technology needs to be properly regulated. 5 Public attitudes to quantum technology 3 Analysis of views The bulk of the reportage that was uncovered during research tended to be around the quantum computing and secure communications. These had the most “strong” views in terms of concerns about personal privacy and security whereas the other technologies had fewer opinions expressed about them and reportage was limited to “factual” reporting about the development of the technology and comments tended to express conditional acceptance-type views. To summarise the emerging themes above: The view that “Quantum computing and secure communications are both semi-permanently ‘on the horizon’”; when it first appeared in the media (in the early 2000s), it was an exciting new technology that had yet to be developed, a situation that apparently continues fourteen years later. There are examples of both frustrations that the technology hasn’t yet appeared and optimism about what may happen in the near future. This persists despite the improvements made in the technology that underpins quantum computing and communications which is underplayed in the media. Reporting of the uses for quantum computing and secure communications focus on their probable applications in decryption and the implications this is likely to have for financial systems and national security. Although they never quite go away, security concerns came back into prominent focus in early 2014, when the NSA was revealed to be building a quantum computer. Quantum technology is acknowledged to be an extremely difficult topic to understand and explain; blog posts that set out to explain it note that it is almost impossible to describe in simple terms. It is also difficult to indisputably demonstrate: there is a strong strand of discussion from experts and researchers on whether the only commercially available quantum computer is actually harnessing quantum effects and how effective the technology is which indicates the complexity of the technology being discussed. There is also evidence of conditional acceptance of the emerging technologies with a spread of views as outlined above, particularly regarding the less-widely-reported technologies (metrology, sensors and simulations). In conclusion, a summary of public views on quantum technology (as far as can be drawn from the sources available) is that the technology is an exciting, potentially highly significant, but not well understood new technology. An emerging opinion is that computing and secure communications have some serious implications for the security of data and issues of personal privacy emerge with later news stories involving the US National Security Agency (see point 4 in the previous chapter). These views seem relatively consistent over time – the same themes emerge in the media as stories develop with ‘what is quantum computing?’ (for example) recurring as the technology gradually advances. 6 Public attitudes to quantum technology 4 Gap analysis Reflections from a researcher: A researcher that took part in the Day of Discovery event in 2014 (organised by Ipsos MORI in London) reflects on her experience: “When I was at the Day of Discovery event, almost every participant came to ask me about quantum computing after hearing that I did my doctorate on a related subject. So my impression is that the public is somewhat uninformed but fascinated by the concept / technology.” This is just one, anecdotal, example but illustrates the potential public interest in this area. Given the lack of available evidence about public attitudes to quantum technology, there are likely to be benefits from better understanding of the views of the public with this area and to do some exploration of attitudes and values relating to this and connected topics. This is very timely considering the announcement of new public investment in this area and increasing coverage of these technologies in the media with work done by researchers in the UK and overseas by companies like Google and D-Wave and bodies such as the NSA. Given the lack of understanding of publics’ views on this subject area, and the £270m of public investment within the very near future, there is a strong argument for deliberative dialogue to understand the views of the public around the applications of quantum technology. The EPSRC National Network of Quantum Technology Hubs Call document outlines the existing commitment to responsible innovation and specifically mentions two-way dialogue (amongst other public engagement activities) and so an opportunity to explore public attitudes to these technologies will exist in the near future: “EPSRC is fully committed to develop and promote responsible innovation. It is expected that the Quantum Technology Hubs will undertake an active programme of education, stakeholder engagement, public engagement and two-way dialogue with wider social groups.” A future public dialogue relating to quantum technologies might want to consider the following as a starting point: “What are the issues that quantum technology (and its applications) raise?” As the levels of discussion in the mainstream media remain relatively basic (or, rather, as basic as coverage can be considering such complicated science), there is work to be done in engaging the public with the science involved (and the applications of the technology). The challenge is to understand the advances in technology and how they might begin to affect computing, communications, research and industry, its impact on society and then to gather public attitudes relating to this. 7 Public attitudes to quantum technology Appendix 1: summary of sources of information Topic Title Type Producer Date Quantum computinggeneral When the revolution is digitised, will there be enough work for us all? Comment from public on comment piece for newspaper Article: Roger Bootle for The Telegraph 9 March 2014 Quantum computinggeneral Video: A first look inside Google & NASA's quantum computing lab Comments on news Article: James Vincent for The Independent 14 Oct 2013 Quantum computinggeneral Quantum computing explained: Harnessing particle physics to work faster Comment on blog post The Guardian Tech Blog Article: 6 March 2014 Comment on news Article: Allan Swann for CBR, your tech social network Article: 3 Sept 2012 Comment on blog post Blog post by Kevin Kwang for ZDNet 3 Sept 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comme nt/rogerbootle/10685682/Roger-BootleWill-there-be-enough-work-to-goround.html http://www.independent.co.uk/lifestyle/gadgets-and-tech/news/video-a-firstlook-inside-google--nasas-quantumcomputing-lab-8879787.html http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/ mar/06/quantum-computing-explainedparticlemechanics?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487 Quantum secure communication UK Scientists crack quantum computing http://www.cbronline.com/news/ukscientists-crack-quantum-computing030812 Quantum secure communication Quantum chip breakthrough to secure mobile devices http://www.zdnet.com/quantum-chipbreakthrough-to-secure-mobile-devices7000003601/ NOT UK EDITION Quantum secure communication Race is on to make quantum teleportation a reality News Adam Mann for wired.co.uk 4 Oct 2012 News and comment on news Duncan Geere for wired.co.uk 14 March 2011 News Katie Collins for wired.co.uk 3 Jan 2014 News and comment on news Khadim Shubber for wired.co.uk 7 May 2013 Comment on The Guardian Article: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201210/04/quantum-teleportation/viewall Quantum secure communication First photon qubit routed, paving the way for a quantum internet http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201103/14/photon-qubit-routed Quantum secure communication NSA working on building an encryption-busting quantum computer http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201401/03/nsa-quantum-computer Quantum secure communication US government lab unveils fully-secure quantum internet system http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201305/7/quantum-internet Quantum Google: 'Where will future quantum 8 Public attitudes to quantum technology computinggeneral computer scientists come from? Our best guess: Minecraft' news Tech Blog 22 Oct 2013 Comment piece by guest writer The Guardian, News 17 March 2005 Blog post The frontline blog 1 Feb 2013 Comments on a blog post ZDNet 4 April 2012 Blog Roland Piquepaille for ZDNet 19 May 2006 Comment on blog post Blog: Tom Espiner for Security Bulletin on ZDNet 15 Oct 2008 Blog post and comment on blog post Karen Friars for From both sides 12 June 2007 http://www.theguardian.com/technology/20 13/oct/22/google-minecraft-qcraft-quantumphysics?commentpage=1 Quantum secure communication Quantum secure communication Second Sight http://www.theguardian.com/technology/20 05/mar/17/comment.comment1 Cambridge boffins cast doubt on quantum computing future Author: Dave Birch, consultant on electronic transactions http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/the-frontlineblog/2240902/cambridge-boffins-castdoubt-on-quantum-computingfuture#disqus_thread Quantum secure communication Researchers develop quantum encryption method to foil hackers http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/researc hers-develop-quantum-encryption-methodto-foil-hackers/11326 Quantum secure communication Quantum cryptography using qutrits Quantum secure communication Toshiba developing quantum repeater Quantum secure communication Are these wires the future of crypto? http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/q uantum-cryptography-using-qutrits/250 http://www.zdnet.com/toshiba-developingquantum-repeater-4010009535/ http://www.zdnet.com/are-these-wires-thefuture-of-crypto-4010005478/ For ZDNet Quantum secure communication, quantum computing A single-photon channel to space Quantum secure communication Surveillance and the limits of GCHQ's powers http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/asingle-photon-channel-to-space/878 Blog and comment Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 29 March 2008 Letter to newspaper Glyn C Evans, Kenilworth, Warwickshire, writing to The Guardian 23 June 2013 News Jason Palmer for BBC News 3 Aug 2012 News Jason Palmer for BBC News 20 Nov 2012 http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23 /surveillance-limit-gchq-powers Quantum secure communication Quantum key distribution with single photons http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-19097605 Quantum secure communication Quantum cryptography done on standard broadband fibre http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science- 9 Public attitudes to quantum technology environment-13940928 Quantum secure communication ‘Uncrackable’ codes set for step up Quantum secure communication Tricking the perfect code machine Quantum secure communication Does quantum mechanics offer the best way to protect our most valuable data? News Melissa Hogenboom for BBC News 4 Sept 2013 News Steven McGann for BBC News 13 Aug 2011 News Christopher White for The Independent 31 March 2011 Comment on blog post Blog: Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 2 Dec 2005 Blog Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 2 Dec 2005 Blog and comment Chris Jablonski for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 16 April 2009 News Duncan Geere for wired.co.uk 2 Sept 2010 News Tia Ghose for wired.co.uk 8 Feb 2010 News Lisa Grossman for wired.co.uk 13 May 2011 News Sophie Curtis for The Telegraph 12 Feb 2014 Comment on a guide Edited Guide entry for H2G2 (The 16 Aug 2000 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-23946488 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology14505750 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scienc e/does-quantum-mechanics-offer-the-bestway-to-protect-our-most-valuable-data2257679.html Quantum secure communication Six atoms in quantum 'cat' state Quantum metrology Six atoms in quantum 'cat' state Quantum metrology New atomic clock loses only a second every 300 million years http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/si x-atoms-in-quantum-cat-state/94 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/si x-atoms-in-quantum-cat-state/94 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/n ew-atomic-clock-loses-only-a-secondevery-300-million-years/1456 Quantum metrology Scientists create 'Quantum Cats' out of light http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201009/02/scientists-create-quantum-cats-outof-light Quantum metrology Quantum logic clock puts old atomic clock to shame http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201002/08/quantum-logic-clock-puts-old-atomicclock-to-shame Quantum metrology Quantum calculations can make atomic clocks of the future far more accurate http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201105/13/better-atomic-clock/viewall Quantum metrology UK pioneers new technology to combat GPS jamming http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/new s/10631705/UK-pioneers-new-technologyto-combat-GPS-jamming.html Quantum metrology A Chronology of Time 10 Public attitudes to quantum technology http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/placelondon/A395273 Quantum sensors Quantum image sensors coming to phone cameras Guide to Life, the Universe and Everything) on BBC.co.uk News Priya Ganapati for wired.co.uk 22 March 2010 News and comment Priya Ganapati for wired.com 22 March 2010 http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201003/22/quantum-image-sensors-coming-tophone-cameras Quantum sensors Quantum Technology Promises Wedding Photos From Phone Cameras http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/03/q uantum-dot-images/ Quantum sensors Quantum key distribution with single photons NOT UK EDITION News Jason Palmer for BBC News 3 Aug 2012 Blog Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 6 Dec 2005 Blog Lucy Sheriff for Qubits and Pieces on ZDNet 18 May 2012 Blog Chris Jablonski for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 16 April 2009 Blog Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 18 Jan 2007 Blog Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 18 July 2006 News Jason Palmer and Alex Mansfield for BBC News 28 Jan 2013 News Jason Palmer for BBC News 13 Aril 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-19097605 Quantum sensors Quantum dots to detect DNA Quantum sensors Quantum dots boost graphene's photodetector dreams http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/q uantum-dots-to-detect-dna/98 http://www.zdnet.com/quantum-dots-boostgraphenes-photodetector-dreams4010026208/ Quantum simulators New atomic clock loses only a second every 300 million years http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/n ew-atomic-clock-loses-only-a-secondevery-300-million-years/1456 Quantum simulators The birth of quantum biology Quantum simulators Painting a semi-conductor Quantum simulators Quantum biology: Do weird physics effects abound in nature? http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/th e-birth-of-quantum-biology/465 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/p ainting-a-semiconductor/296 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-21150047 Quantum simulators Quantum computing: Is it possible, should you care? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-17688257 11 Public attitudes to quantum technology Quantum simulators Elusive magnetic ‘monopole’ seen in quantum system News James Morgan for BBC News 30 Jan 2014 News Jason Palmer for BBC News 24 March 2011 News Metro 14 Dec 2012 Blog and comment Roland Piquepaille for Emerging Tech on ZDNet 27 Aug 2006 Comment on news article Article: Christopher Booker for The Telegraph Article: 27 Dec 2008 Blog Lucy Sheriff for Qubits and Pieces on ZDNet 1 May 2012 News James Morgan and Jonathan Amos for BBC News 9 Oct 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-25946734 Quantum simulators Quantum physics explanation for smell gains traction http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-12827893 Quantum simulators Quantum computers: The start of an intergalactic internet? http://metro.co.uk/2012/12/14/quantumcomputers-the-start-of-an-intergalacticinternet-3316352/ Quantum simulators Data mining used to find new materials Quantum simulators 2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/d ata-mining-used-to-find-new-materials/336 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum nists/christopherbooker/3982101/2008was-the-year-man-made-global-warmingwas-disproved.html Quantum simulators 300 atom quantum simulator smashes qubit record http://www.zdnet.com/300-atom-quantumsimulator-smashes-qubit-record4010026044/ Quantum simulators Computer chemists win Nobel Prize Quantum computing From science fiction to science fact Newspaper Belfast Newsletter 20 June 2002 Quantum computing Quantum computing is set to revolutionise the way we work. Trouble. Newspaper Independent 26 Jan 2005 Quantum computing Obstacle for quantum computer Newspaper Guardian 14 July 2005 Quantum computing News narratives about nano S&T in major US and non-US newspapers (27(2)175) Journal paper Science Communicatio n (L. Stephens) 1 Dec 2005 Quantum computing Computers about to take a quantum leap into the future Newspaper Guardian 8 Feb 2007 Quantum computing Will the QC kill the PC? Newspaper Daily Telegraph 1 July 2008 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-24458534 12 Public attitudes to quantum technology Quantum computing Quantum computing for everyone Quantum computing Quantum computing Blog Michael Nielsen 28 Aug 2008 Quantum computing could be enormous. Because it’s very tiny Newspaper Daily Telegraph 18 Dec 2008 Quantum computing: Is it possible and should you care? Website BBC Online 13 April 2012 Blog Nature Blogs (Geoffrey Brumfiel) 17 Aug 2012 Newspaper Financial Times Sept 2012 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum -computing-for-everyone/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-17688257 Quantum computing D-Wave quantum computer solves protein folding problem http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/08/ d-wave-quantum-computer-solvesprotein-folding-problem.html Quantum computing Quantum chip breakthrough to be unveiled Quantum computing Understanding quantum computers is more difficult than working out The Matrix Newspaper Metro 14 Dec 2012 Quantum computing Quantum computer passes speed test Blog Nature Blogs (Nicola Jones) 9 May 2013 Quantum computing NASA buys into ‘quantum’ computer Website BBC 16 May 2013 Quantum computing Google and NASA launch quantum computing AI lab Website MIT Technology Review 16 May 2013 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1410dc2cf383-11e1-b3a200144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_ i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.co m%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F1410dc2cf383-11e1-b3a200144feabdc0.html%3Fsiteedition%3D uk&siteedition=uk&_i_referer=#axzz2tI 7s4b4A http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/05/ quantum-computer-passes-speedtest.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-22554494 http://www.technologyreview.com/new s/514846/google-and-nasa-launchquantum-computing-ai-lab/ Quantum computing Boffins make a quantum leap towards superfast computers Newspaper Independent 18 Nov 2013 Quantum computing Quantum memory world record smashed Website BBC Online 18 Nov 2013 Quantum computing Nobel laureate celebrates £270m investment into quantum research Newspaper City AM 6 Dec 2013 Quantum computing Quantum leap towards commercial applications Newspaper Daily Telegraph 6 Dec 2013 Quantum £11m space technology centre named Newspaper Independent 6 Dec http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienceenvironment-24934786 13 Public attitudes to quantum technology computing after UK scientist behind ‘God particle’ Quantum computing Osborne has pledged £270m over five years for the setting up of a network of quantum technology centres Newspaper Guardian 6 Dec 2013 Quantum computing D-Wave CEO Vern Brownell on Quantum Computing and tackling tech’s big problems Video (Website) TechCrunch 23 Dec 2013 Blog ShtetlOptimized (Scott Aaronson) 24 Dec 2013 Website VentureBeat (Christina Farr) 27 Dec 2013 Blog ReadWrite (Lauren Orsini) 30 Dec 2013 Blog (Video) MIT CSAIL (Scott Aaronson) 30 Dec 2013 Newspaper Washington Post 2 Jan 2014 Website Gizmodo 2 Jan 2014 Website BBC Online 3 Jan 2014 Website BBC Online 17 Jan 2014 2013 http://techcrunch.com/2013/12/23/dwave-ceo-quantum-computing-vernbrownellinterview/?ncid=twittersocialshare Quantum computing My quantum computing research explained, using only the most common 1000 English words http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p =1628 Quantum computing D-Wave: Multimillion dollar sham or quantum breakthrough? http://venturebeat.com/2013/12/27/dwave-a-multimillion-dollar-sham-orquantum-breakthrough-interview/ Quantum computing How D-Wave could make or break quantum computing http://readwrite.com/2013/12/30/dwave-quantumcomputing#awesm=~otRGd1r9vGIV7j Quantum computing Does quantum computing seem too complicated? https://www.csail.mit.edu/node/2138 Quantum computing NSA seeks to build quantum computer that could crack most types of encryption http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ national-security/nsa-seeks-to-buildquantum-computer-that-could-crackmost-types-ofencryption/2014/01/02/8fff297e-719511e3-8defa33011492df2_story.html?Post+generi c=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonp ost Quantum computing The NSA’s trying to build a quantum computer so it can break any code http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2014/01/thensas-trying-to-build-a-quantumcomputer-so-it-can-break-any-code/ Quantum computing NSA developing code-cracking quantum computer http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology25588605 Quantum computing Study doubts quantum computer speed http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science- 14 Public attitudes to quantum technology environment-25787226 Quantum computing Hack the multiverse (D-Wave company blog) Blog D-Wave http://dwave.wordpress.com/ 15 Public attitudes to quantum technology Appendix 2: Google scholar searches on ‘public opinion’ together with following search-terms: Quantum Quantum Secure Communications o digital keys o quantum key distribution o quantum communication technologies o (distributed) quantum entanglement o quantum-secure database query o (distributed) quantum information processing o scalable network architectures Quantum Metrology o atomic clocks AND GPS Quantum Sensors Quantum Simulators o Quantum AND drug o Quantum AND superconductivity o Quantum AND health o Quantum AND “trapped atoms” OR ions OR molecules o Quantum AND “multiple photons” o Quantum AND “superconducting circuits” o Quantum AND “electron spins” 16