Measuring Educational Excellence in MPP Dr. Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer MIT Technology & Policy Program MIT-Portugal Program 3-1-2010 pfotenh@mit.edu Outline • Program assessment in MPP • Sources of excellence in MPP education • Spreading excellence: Portuguese benchmarking and systemic spillovers • Challenges for the future Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Program assessment in MPP • Real-time program assessment to – Demonstrate impact – Foster organizational learning – Study the generalizability of MPP framework • Use of multiple survey tools, including – Large online student survey (repeated annually) covering both MPP and non-MPP students – Faculty interviews with both MPP and non-MPP faculty to complement the student data – Comparative cohort is important to identify MPP impact and study program embedding in Portuguese university environment Survey focus: • Education & attracting students • Internationalization & mobility • Networking & communication • Entrepreneurial activity & industry linkages • Spillovers • Implementation & external relations Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Sources of excellence in MPP (I): Attracting excellent students • MPP program goal: “…developing new, world-class education programs in Portuguese universities for top engineering students from Portugal and around the world.” • MPP attracts excellent and distinctly different students: – High degree of internationalization – More experienced masters students and younger PhD students – More diverse backgrounds, stronger industry backgrounds – Towards gender parity in PhD programs – Higher expectations towards their program – Greater inclination towards industry and entrepreneurship after graduation – High motivation • Faculty comments on the student body: – “I believe MPP is successful in attracting the very good students Portugal has in the areas of Bioengineering. Actually, we are now also reaching students from pharmaceutical science and different areas, and all of them are successful.” – “contagious high level of ambition.” Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Sources of excellence in MPP (III): Innovating Teaching and Learning • MPP program goal : “… changing the traditional patterns of teaching and learning.” • Changes in teachings style and course design: • – “Students in our non-MPP classes are used to the teacher coming into the class and giving them all that they need to learn and go back. With the MPP students it’s different. We are trying to implement a model here where MPP students have a lot of homework and a lot of self-studying, which our other students don’t do. So classes are more focused on what they work at home, and then they bring new things to the classes.“ – Dori and Silva (2009) : Innovative and modular course design benefits student learning Active Learning Strategies & TLL: – • “A one day course really had an impact on me in the sense of how to deliver classes. The next week, I was teaching differently. The class was about active learning strategies, and we had some hands-on learning experience about how to make activities in class, to help students learn actively versus just standing and listening to the teacher. Teachers are willing to learn, too: – “I am also in a learning process in the MIT-Portugal Program, in this new engineering approach of bringing together economic aspects, management, etc.” Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Sources of excellence in MPP (IV): Networking • MPP program goal: … building a network to foster innovative post-graduate programs that offer world-class training” • Portuguese university network achieved a lot: – The strongest point is this common collaboration and common production of both education and research. It is a very effective way of improving, and I think this is maybe most positive element.” – “radically different,” “impossible without MPP,” “moved universities closer together” – Works at all levels: Student-student, faculty-faculty, and to some extent faculty-student – MPP students possess on average more contacts to Portuguese groups and slightly more contacts internationally • “I don’t think we could have achieved the same quality without MPP. You have a lot of very good people at IST, in Porto, and in Minho, but bringing them together was only possible through the MIT-Portugal Program. So the quality of teaching is high in the in the sense that you can gather the most knowledgeable people from three universities. If it wasn’t for the MPP framework, those people would never be working together. This was an improvement. ” Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Sources of excellence in MPP (V): Linking education to industry needs and innovation • Breaking ground providing core skills for innovation and entrepreneurship: – “MPP definitely contributes to acquiring these skills. For example, the courses focused on innovation: To my best knowledge, there are no existing PhD program in Portugal that has innovation in the curriculum, because they are focused on pure science. [..] All the students give terrific feedback. It is really interesting to them to explore that different area.” – “It has not existed in Portugal before, and it has been a major concern of the MITPortugal Program. We were aware that this was a lack of teaching. It was already in the back of our mind, but it was never implemented.” – “Faculty are getting much more interested in promoting to their the processes of innovation, entrepreneurship, and how to interact.” • Popular courses on innovation: bio-teams Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Spreading Excellence: Benchmarking and educational spillovers • MPP program goal: “… strives to become a model international program with innovative research and education.” • MPP is perceived as best-practice example for Portugal with benchmarking quality – • • “Compared to the rest of IST it’s doing very well, very successful. [..] And the quality of teaching is of crucial importance to the standards of excellence that we are trying to achieve, also for the following years for attracting good students.” MPP education is spilling over into Portuguese universities: – Most MPP faculty continue teaching other (non-MPP) classes – MPP faculty actively communicate about their MPP experiences with non-MPP faculty – “Inside our school I am sure about it. Even people not related to this [program] inside this university they look to the MIT-Portugal program ‘OK, these guys are doing this, and this is very interesting.’ That set’s a kind of benchmarking for quality of procedures. People are getting much more interested in the processes of innovation, entrepreneurship, and how to interact. It’s leaking out of MIT-Portugal, that’s’ for sure.” – Active copying of MPP course design and assessment method Young scientists are influenced most – Boost of career, much important input, greatest adaptation – Mobility (MIT visits) is important source of impact, esp. for young faculty – “Maybe not the teachers that are in a state of their career where they don’t want to change, because they are just sufficiently old to not change, but younger teachers like myself will definitely change.” Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Towards a second program phase… • Overarching consensus that second period is necessary – Not primarily for monetary reasons: – Consolidation: “Current phase raises awareness, but no create big changes yet,” “Would not be able to do it alone at the moment” – Address weaknesses of first phase: “Industry relations take time,” “Adjustments of the funding allocation” – Sustainability: “Need at least 10-15 years for such changes in PT,” “System not prepared for sustaining the changes,” “old system will outlive the changes,” “Portugal trained a brilliant cohort of young scientists, investment will be lost” • Second phase is critical for educational part: – “My concern would be mainly on the teaching part of the program. If we don’t find funding, keeping MIT in the teaching would be out of question.” – The loss of the MIT brand would have an impact on attractiveness of the program, in particular for international students – “Those common courses that exist might cease to exist , and courses might become more of an island again.“ – “The old system would outlive the changes” Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Challenges for the future (1) • MPP coped well with organizational challenges (steep learning curve): – “Some courses are taught by more than 4 people, and this involves a lot of coordination, and a lot of talking, and a lot of organizing. [..] Somehow we overcame that and we actually did a good job setting up these courses.” • Revision of curricula – Harmonization, Synergies, coordination between universities – Preparation of students from different backgrounds: spend almost one term on catching-up More emphasis on pre-term prep classes & benefits of having different backgrounds – More industry involvement in curriculum design and thesis proposals • Restructuring open calls? – Decoupling between education & research needs at students’ expense (originally coupled) • Positive experience with STELLAR course software similar buildup of other tools, e.g. OCW Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Challenges for the future (2) • Legal structure: – Create for free space for good teaching: professional university management – No perspective for young faculty in Portugal unless legal framework are radically changed – “MPP created a group of people that are leading fields of knowledge that did not exist in Portugal. So there was a lot of investment in young faculty, to develop these areas. What happens is that Portuguese universities are not prepared for this type of programs. We have these few places for professors, and universities cannot open more spaces for new faculty to come in. So MPP did a huge investment in young people, but at the end of the program, universities will not have the capacity to keep them. I think this is a big challenge, because all the effort that we had during these years – I am not talking only about the money, but also the personal investment of all the people that are involved – this can be lost in a few years.” • Key role of junior faculty: Are affected most by MPP Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu Conclusions • • • • • MPP’s education component has been exceedingly successful The program is viewed as lighthouse of educational quality Quality and dedication of MPP faculty is key factor of success Build on faculty experiences to prepare the program for the future Prepare the system to absorb MPP achievements and faculty Thank you for your attention & congratulations to award recipients! Measuring excellence in MPP education | Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer | pfotenh@mit.edu