Impact of patients` online access to laboratory results in British

advertisement
Impact of patients’ online access to
laboratory results in British Columbia:
Primary care utilization and patient self-management
CAHSPR-2014
May 14
Chad Leaver & Simon Hagens
Canada Health Infoway-Inforoute Santé du Canada
Heather Smith Fowler
Société de recherche sociale et appliquée/Social Research and Demonstration Corporation
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
Outline
• Background and Canadians’ access to personal
health records
•
•
•
•
Research Objectives
Methodology
Results
Discussion
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
2
Infoway’s vision
Healthier Canadians through innovative digital
health solutions
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
3
The emerging literature
Utilization
• decrease in rates of office/outpatient visits and an
increase in phone contacts and messaging.
Patient self-efficacy
• increased rates of medication adjustment among
patients with diabetes.
Patient-Physician relationship
• improved the quality of interactions with physicians,
better informed about their own health.
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
4
Canadians’ Access to Consumer Health Tools
10%
5%
5%
6%
2%
0%
access to own record
2010
2012
2013
2014
Q. Can you currently access your own medical records electronically (for example, to look up your lab test results)?
Sources:
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
2010
2012
2013
2014
Infoway
Infoway
Infoway
Infoway
Innovation Challenge Survey (Ipsos Reid)
Consumer Experience/Use Survey (Harris Decima)
Public Opinion and Use Tracking Survey (Ipsos Reid)
Annual Tracking Survey (Harris Decima)
Access varies by region
% Canadians
50%
40%
30%
27%
20%
3%
10%
1%
3%
0%
BC
AB
SK/MB
ON
2%
ATL
Q. Can you currently access your own medical records electronically (for example, to look up your lab test results)?
Sources: 2014 Infoway Annual Tracking Survey (Harris Decima)
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
6
Access to record and system utilization
Q24. In the last year did you access
your medical records electronically
(for example, to look up your lab test
results)?*
0
2014
70%
0%
20%
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
40%
30%
60%
80%
53%
100%
Yes No
Q25. Did you
visit
47%
avoid an in-person
because you could access your medical
records electronically?
Base: Respondents who can access medical records electronically (n=93)
Base: Respondents who accessed medical records electronically in the last year (n=64)
*Question modification since 2013: Have you ever accessed your electronic medical record 7
(for example, to look up your lab test results)?
Direct patient access to lab results
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
8
Four key research questions:
1. Does direct lab access improve patient experience?
2. Do patients with direct lab access receive their results more reliably or more
quickly?
3. Does direct lab access impact patients’ follow-up and contact with their
physicians?
4. What is the impact of direct lab access on physicians and their practices?
OBJECTIVES, DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Research objectives
9
A mixed methods approach:
• qualitative – key informant interviews with a small group of physicians
• quantitative – an online survey of patients (n = 3292)
A quasi-experimental research design:
• A treatment group - people who are current subscribers to an online direct
lab access service (the service users group; n=2064)
• A comparison group – a matched sub-group of a general population panel
(n=1245)
OBJECTIVES, DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Research design
10
• We balanced the outgoing sample for the comparison cohort by age and
gender to better match it with the treatment cohort (service users)
• The sample was then weighted according to the proportion of service
users who had abnormal results on their most recent lab tests
• In the final sample, some differences were observed:
•
•
•
•
•
•
PARTICIPANT PROFILE
Notes on the final sample
Immigration status/Language speak at home
Income
Education
Region
Lab tests service utilization
Access to consumer health solutions
11
PATIENT OUTCOMES
Key patient outcomes
Service
reliability
Health service
utilization
Empowerment
Satisfaction and
comprehension
Anxiety
12
Service reliability – key results
Service Users
Comparison
Group
Received their most recent lab
test results “in a few days”
82%**
36%
Know the results of their most
recent lab test
91%**
73%
13
Comprehension – Key Results
• Practices will need to work differently to
support patients with direct access to results
Confident that you fully understood
your lab results?
(score = 7-10)
Not confident that you fully
understood your lab results
(score <7)
Service
Users
Comparison
Group
76%
85%**
24%**
15%
14
Anxiety – Key Results
No more anxious after receiving results
After receiving lab test results
Before receiving lab test results
30%
30%
27%
25%
25%
25% **
20%
20%
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Some (50-100)
Service Users group
Note: **p<0.05
Comparison group
14%
15%
Some (50-100)
Learned Online
Learned Otherwise
% responses 50 and above on 100 point anxiety scale
15
Utilization – Key Results
Contacted their doctor/clinic
while waiting for results
Any in-person visits in the process
of receiving or discussing lab test
results
Service
Users
Comparison
Group
9%
28%**
59%
83%**
16
• Physician interviews - short and conducted with a small convenience
sample;
• No random assignment to treatment – limited attribution
• Comparison group matched to service user respondents, not all service
users or the general population;
SURVEY RESULTS
Study limitations
• Survey was very specific & linear - may not capture different ways
patients use the service
• Focus on patients’ most recent test may not represent typical experience
17
1. Patient experience – Direct lab access had generally had positive effects
2. Effectiveness of lab test services delivery – Service users reported clear
advantages in terms of service reliability and timeliness
3. Utilization of health services – Service users reported lower rates of
contact with physicians, both while waiting for results and afterwards. Still,
almost 60% of service users reported having an in-person visit to discuss
their results
4. Physician’s practices and relationship with patients – In general,
physicians reported no administrative or clinical changes to their practice,
and made several suggestions on ways to improve direct lab access
services.
SURVEY RESULTS
Conclusions
18
• Study supports the emerging literature that shows personal health
records enhance the quality of patient-physician interactions, with little
to no change in administrative practice or burden.
• While the majority of patients reported positive experiences, there
seemed to be more benefits for those who required frequent monitoring
(e.g., for chronic health conditions).
SURVEY RESULTS
Implications
• Service development should help patients and physicians make sense of
what lab test results mean, with tools (e.g., glossaries) and other
resources.
• More research could help understand how benefits are achieved, and
how they can be maximized in different healthcare contexts.
19
Thank you
©Canada Health Infoway 2014
Download