EXECUTING THE BUDGET: ASSURE INTEGRITY, FOSTER PERFORMANCE, ENCOURAGE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY S. Schiavo-Campo September 2007 OBJECTIVES AND REQUIREMENTS OF BUDGET EXECUTION The objectives of budget execution are mainly control and operational efficiency, as strategic allocation should be covered at budget preparation stage. The focus of budget execution is on minimizing “fiduciary risk”:” Narrow definition: the risk that government expenditures diverge from those authorized in the budget (misappropriations or misallocations) Broad definition: the above risk, plus the risk that the budgeted resources are wasted or spent ineffectively. The requirements of budget execution are: Compliance: Assure that the budget is implemented in conformity with the approved budget – key for legitimacy Adaptation: Capacity to respond to major macroeconomic changes Sound management: providing systems to enable operational efficiency. The three main causes of overspending: 1. An unrealistic budget 2. An unrealistic budget, and 3. AN UNREALISTIC BUDGET CAUSES OF NON-COMPLIANCE Overt non-compliance comes from, and demonstrates, lack of expenditure control Indirect non-compliance comes from accumulation of payment arrears. Payment arrears The problem: in a cash-based budget, monitoring and control are geared to actual payments—producing a temptation to incur commitments without the annual budget to pay for them. The underlying liability saddles future budgets and destroys government credibility A solution: monitor commitments separately and regularly THE CYCLE OF EXPENDITURE Appropriation (as approved by parliament) \/ Allocation to subordinate units, cash plan, and release of spending authority \/ Commitment (contract signed)Æ Order \/ Supplier \/ Verification of delivery ÅÅ-----Delivery \/ Instruction to treasury \/ Actual payment (normally by check, for ease of accounting and reporting, and to prevent irregularities.) COMPLIANCE CONTROLS Before commitment: financial control, to verify that: the money is available in the budget expenditure is in the correct category a duly-authorized person has approved. This regular financial verification and control is different from “ex ante audit”, which also questions the purpose and efficiency of the expenditure. Normally, ex ante audit is undesirable, but should not be eliminated before accountability systems are sufficiently strengthened. [Compliance controls, continued] Before payment: Accounting control, to verify that: a valid commitment exists a competent/authorized person has certified that the goods were received or services performed invoice and payment request are correct the payee is correctly identified After payment: Audit control, on all above. Balance the necessary control with cutting red tape and encouraging expenditure efficiency THE TREASURY FUNCTION “Remember Willie Sutton” Key activities of the state treasury: cash management and planning borrowing forecasts management of debt, aid flows and government financial assets supervision of all government bank accounts It is important to centralize all government cash TREASURY “SINGLE ACCOUNT” To centralize cash, all government cash transactions should go through a “Treasury single account” (or set of linked accounts). Under the system: spending agencies have bank accounts, subsidiary of Treasury single account; these are “conduit”, zero-balance accounts, with money transferred into them as the payments are approved agencies’ accounts are automatically “swept” daily (or weekly) for cash consolidation into the treasury. Don’t confuse centralizing cash with centralizing payments DEBT MANAGEMENT: KEY PRINCIPLES Only one government authority should be authorized to borrow – by law Outline in the budget the borrowing plan, consistent with fiscal targets Government should publish regular reports on debt, in standard format Every loan transaction should be recorded (lenders’ cooperation is needed) Debt is the only budget category that requires accrual accounting–cash-based recording is insufficient and risky Give debt management responsibility to MoF (except for CB open-market op.s) AID MANAGEMENT (“DO look a gift horse in the mouth”) Budgetary principles: Integrate aid with other resources: show in the budget all aid and counterpart funds--whether loans or grants, monetary or in kind Submit grant-financed expenditures to the same scrutiny as any other expenditure: Don’t confuse the nature of the activity with the terms of financing Control and audit counterpart funds from aid in the same manner as other government accounts – if possible, place their management in the Treasury. [aid management, continued] Organizational principles: Responsibility belongs to the government One aid management office (best in MoF) Office organized along donor lines, not sectors, to develop information on donor procedures and good contacts; but, Aid management office should interact closely with sectors; and The office should “function to facilitate”, and not interfere in project selection decisions (for which the sectoral line ministries and agencies are responsible) WHAT’S THE MONEY FOR? A WORD ABOUT “PERFORMANCE” Performance is not a simple concept ("Achievement”,"realization","fulfillment') “Performance” can be subjective (for effort) or objective (for results). Choose results-orientation, but don’t forget the effort dimension. Also, the "results" must be appropriately defined, and an exclusive focus on results without respecting process will weaken process and eventually produce bad results “Performance” is the achievement of agreed results within resources and time provided, without diluting quality and respecting the prevailing norms of due process. THE FOUR "P'S" OF BUDGETING PERFORMANCE Traditional paradigm: Probity and Propriety New paradigm: Policy and Performance Beware of dichotomies – All Four P’s are essential to execute well the budget, and foster both integrity and operational efficiency. MEASURING PERFORMANCE “What gets measured gets managed" (Really?) Conditions: The right thing must be measured The thing must be measured right Corollary: "What doesn't get measured doesn't get managed" ACCOUNTABILITY FOR WHAT? Types of performance indicators: Input: resource use Output: immediate result Outcome: ultimate result Impact: net outcome Process: procedures When performance measurement is both appropriate and cost-effective, performance should be assessed according to that combination of input, output, outcome and process indicators which is realistic and suitable for the specific activity, sector and country MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE “From 3 to 4 E’s” Indicator Inputs Outputs Social Value Criterion Cost Economy Price of close Efficiency substitute Outcomes Undetermined Effectiveness Process Undetermined Equity/fairness ______________________________________ __ THE “CREAM” OF GOOD PERFORMANCE A performance indicator must be: Clear Relevant Economic Adequate Monitorable Never use either one single indicator or too many indicators INTRODUCING PERFORMANCE: INDICATORS IN THE BUDGET Introduce a few, simple, key indicators, with direct participation of from frontline staff and service users Monitor developments closely, and adjust continuously based on the fullest/widest possible feedback (“report cards”?) Expand gradually When in doubt, DON’T do it. Avoid too much monitoring, too little evaluation SOME OPERATIONAL ISSUES Compare “Peter” to “Paul” or today’s “Paul” with yesterday's “Paul? Can the performance management system create emulation and incentives for greater efficiency? “Quality” is the. Achilles' Heel of all performance measurement. How can the quality of basic services be protected in a result-oriented system? Assure independent external scrutiny How and by whom is the change from inertial budgeting to result-orientation to be managed? THE BOTTOM LINE It is possible to execute badly a good and realistic budget; it is not possible to execute well a bad and unrealistic budget. 2. International experience demonstrates that strengthening efficiency and effectiveness in budget execution cannot be accomplished by excessive controls,but by introducing into the budget management system: 1. A systematic, robust, and transparent dialogue on results