Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Stabilizer Design

advertisement
MSD : SAE Aero Aircraft Design & Build
Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Stabilizer Design, Longitudinal and Directional Static Stability
Horizontal Stabilizer Parameters:
1. Ratio of horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance with respect to fuselage length
π‘™π‘Žπ‘ /𝑙𝑓
2. Overall fuselage length 𝑙𝑓
3. Horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance π‘™π‘Žπ‘
4. Horizontal tail volume coefficient 𝑉𝐻
5. Center of gravity location π‘₯𝑐𝑔
6. Horizontal tail arm 𝑙𝑑
7. Horizontal tail planform area 𝑆𝑑
8. Horizontal tail airfoil
9. Horizontal tail aspect ratio 𝐴𝑅𝑑
10. Horizontal tail taper ratio πœ†π‘‘
11. Additional geometric parameters (Sweep Angle, Twist Angle, Dihedral)
12. Incidence Angle 𝑖𝑑
13. Neutral Point π‘₯𝑁𝑃
14. Static Margin
15. Overall Horizontal Stabilizer Geometry
16. Overall Aircraft Static Longitudinal Stability
17. Elevator (TBD in Control Surfaces Design)
Vertical Stabilizer Parameters:
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Vertical tail volume coefficient 𝑉𝑣
Vertical tail arm 𝑙𝑣
Vertical tail planform area 𝑆𝑉
Vertical tail aspect ratio 𝐴𝑅𝑣
Vertical tail span 𝑏𝑣
Vertical tail sweep angle Λ π‘£
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Vertical tail minimum lift curve slope 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑣
Vertical tail airfoil
Overall Vertical Stabilizer Geometry
Overall Aircraft Static Direction Stability
Rudder (TBD in Control Surfaces Design)
1. l/Lf Ratio: 0.6
The table below shows statistical ratios between the distance between the wing aerodynamic center
and the horizontal tail aerodynamic center π‘™π‘Žπ‘ with respect to the overall fuselage length (Lf).
2. Fuselage Length (Lf): 60.00 in
Choosing this value is an iterative process to meet longitudinal and vertical static stability, internal
storage, and center of gravity requirements, but preliminarily choose 𝑙𝑓 = 60.00 𝑖𝑛
3. Horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance 𝒍𝒂𝒄 : 36.00 in
π‘™π‘Žπ‘
= 0.6
𝑙𝑓
π‘™π‘Žπ‘ = 36.00 𝑖𝑛
4. Horizontal Tail Volume Coefficient (VH): 1.0
The table below shows the horizontal and vertical tail coefficients for various types of aircraft.
𝑉𝐻 =
𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑑
𝑆𝑐
𝑉𝐻 = 1
5. Center of Gravity Location (xcg):𝟎. πŸ‘πŸŽπ‘
Justification:
a) Choose center of gravity aft of aerodynamic center to aid (give more room) with placing
components to meet specified center of gravity location.
b) If horizontal tail stabilizes aircraft pitching up, it generates a positive lift force, adding to the
wing lift.
c) 0.30𝑐 is the aft most recommended limit for center of gravity placement.
6. Horizontal Tail Arm 𝒍𝒕 : 35.2537 in
𝑙𝑑 = π‘™π‘Žπ‘ − π‘₯𝑐𝑔 − π‘₯π‘Žπ‘
𝑙𝑑 = 35.2537 𝑖𝑛
7. Horizontal Tail Planform Area (St): 3.6352 𝑓𝑑 2
𝑉𝐻 =
𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑑
=1
𝑆𝑐
𝑆𝑑 = 3.6352 𝑓𝑑 2
8. Airfoil Selection: NACA-0021
Justification:
a) Choose symmetric airfoil as the horizontal tail should behave in a similar manner when at a
positive or negative angle-of-attack
b) Horizontal tail should never stall, specifically it should at least stall later than the wing for
recovery
c) Maximize 𝐢𝐿 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯
𝑑
d) Maximize 𝐢𝐿 𝛼
𝑑
e) Minimize overall drag
f) Minimize overall size
NACA-0009:
NACA-0010:
NACA-0015:
NACA-0018
NACA-0021:
NACA-0024:
NACA-0018, NACA-0021, NACA-0024 Airfoil Comparison:
9. Aspect Ratio 𝑨𝑹𝒕 : 4
Justification:
a) It is recommended that the aspect ratio of the tail be such that the span is longer than the
propeller diameter to ensure that a portion of the tail is out of the wake or downwash of the
wing, increasing tail efficiency πœ‚ .
b) Horizontal tail aspect ratio should be lower than that of the wing to increase stall angle and
allow for recovery if needed
c) It is recommended that:
2
𝐴𝑅𝑑 = 𝐴𝑅𝑀
3
𝐴𝑅𝑑 = 4
10. Horizontal Tail Taper Ratio 𝝀𝒕 : 0.7
a) For transport aircraft, the horizontal tail taper ratio is usually between 0.4 and 0.7
b) To ensure a higher stall angle than the wing through a lower Oswald efficiency factor and a lift
distribution that is less elliptical, choose πœ†π‘‘ = 0.7
11. Additional geometric parameters (Sweep Angle, Twist Angle, Dihedral): N/A
a) For the benefits of applying the any of the above parameters to the horizontal geometry, refer
to the preliminary wing design parameter selection document
b) In the preliminary design phase, it is recommended to make these parameters have the same
values as those of the wing.
12. Horizontal Tail Incidence Angle π’Šπ’• : 4.2300 deg
-
Determine horizontal tail incidence angle to trim (longitudinal) aircraft at cruise
πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 = πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔
𝑀
+ πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 + πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 = 0
𝑑
𝑓
πΆπ‘š 0 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑀 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑑 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑑 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑓 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ = 0
πΆπ‘š π‘Žπ‘ 𝑀 + 𝐢𝐿0 𝑀
π‘˜ 2 −π‘˜ 1
36.5𝑆𝑐
π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓
π‘₯=0
π‘₯ 𝑐𝑔
𝑐
−
π‘₯ π‘Žπ‘
𝑐
+ 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀
π‘₯ 𝑐𝑔
𝑐
−
π‘₯ π‘Žπ‘
𝑐
𝑀𝑓 2 𝛼0 𝑀 + 𝑖𝑓 Δπ‘₯ +
𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ€0 + 𝑖𝑀 − 𝑖𝑑 − πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼
𝑑
1
36.5𝑆𝑐
𝑖𝑑 = 4.2300 𝑑𝑒𝑔
13. Neutral Point 𝒙𝑡𝑷 :0.7067𝑐
𝐢𝐿 𝛼
π‘₯𝑛𝑝 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘ πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓
π‘‘πœ€
𝑑
=
−
+ πœ‚π‘‰π»
1−
𝑐
𝑐
𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀
𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀
𝑑𝛼
π‘₯𝑁𝑃 = 0.7067𝑐
14. Static Margin: 0.3548
π‘†π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘”π‘–π‘› = π‘₯𝑁𝑃 − π‘₯𝑐𝑔
π‘†π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘”π‘–π‘› = 0.3548
π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓
π‘₯=0
𝑀𝑓 2
πœ•πœ€ 𝑒
πœ•π›Ό
Δπ‘₯
𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ = 0
𝑑
1−
π‘‘πœ€
𝑑𝛼
𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ +
15. Horizontal Stabilizer Geometry
16. Overall Aircraft Longitudinal Stability
Criteria for Longitudinal Static Stability
πΆπ‘š 𝛼 =
π‘‘πΆπ‘š
<0
𝑑𝛼
πΆπ‘š 0 > 0
πΆπ‘š 0 = πΆπ‘š 0 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑑 +πΆπ‘š 0 𝑓
πΆπ‘š 0 = πΆπ‘š π‘Žπ‘ 𝑀 + 𝐢𝐿0 𝑀
π‘₯𝑐𝑔 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘
π‘˜2 − π‘˜1
−
+ πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ€0 + 𝑖𝑀 − 𝑖𝑑 +
𝑑
𝑐
𝑐
36.5𝑆𝑐
π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓
𝑀𝑓 2 𝛼0 𝑀 + 𝑖𝑓 Δπ‘₯
π‘₯=0
πΆπ‘š 𝛼 = πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑑 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓
πΆπ‘š 𝛼 = 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀
π‘₯𝑐𝑔 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘
π‘‘πœ€
1
−
− πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 1 −
+
𝑑
𝑐
𝑐
𝑑𝛼
36.5𝑆𝑐
π‘ͺπ’Ž 𝜢 𝟏/𝒓𝒂𝒅
π‘ͺπ’Ž 𝟎
π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓
𝑀𝑓 2
π‘₯=0
πœ•πœ€π‘’
Δπ‘₯
πœ•π›Ό
-1.4679
0.1281
18. Vertical tail volume coefficient 𝑽𝒗 : 0.06
The following table shows the vertical tail characteristics for various aircraft. Because our aircraft
configuration and mission requirements are very similar to the C-130, many vertical tail parameters are
chosen so that they match those of that aircraft.
𝑉𝑣 =
𝑙𝑣 𝑆𝑣
𝑆𝑏
𝑉𝑣 = 0.06
19. Vertical tail arm 𝒍𝒗 : 36.1102 in
During the preliminary design phase, the vertical tail arm is selected to be equal to the horizontal tail
arm, then adjusted after further iterations if needed.
𝑙𝑣 = 36.1102 𝑖𝑛
20. Vertical tail planform area 𝑺𝑽 : 1.1521 𝑓𝑑 2
𝑉𝑣 =
𝑙𝑣 𝑆𝑣
= 0.08
𝑆𝑏
𝑆𝑣 = 1.1521 𝑓𝑑 2
21. Vertical tail aspect ratio 𝑨𝑹𝒗 : 1.84
Choose vertical tail aspect ratio such that it matches that of the C-130 (Table 6.6).
𝑨𝑹𝒗 = 𝟏. πŸ–πŸ’
22. Vertical tail span 𝒃𝒗 : 17.4716 in
𝐴𝑅𝑣 =
𝑏𝑣 2
𝑆𝑣
𝑏𝑣 = 17.4716 𝑖𝑛
23. Vertical tail sweep angle πš²π’— : 18.8 deg
Choose vertical tail sweep angle such that it matches that of the C-130 (Table 6.6).
Λ π‘£ = 18.8 𝑑𝑒𝑔
24. Vertical tail minimum lift curve slope π‘ͺπ‘³πœΆ 𝒗 : 0.0011137 [1/deg]
-
Determine minimum vertical tail lift curve slope so to meet the static directional stability
requirement 𝐢𝑛 𝛽 > 0
𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = 𝐢𝑛 𝛽
𝑀𝑓
+ 𝐢𝑛 𝛽
𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = −π‘˜π‘› π‘˜π‘…π‘™
𝐢𝐿 𝛼
𝑣 π‘šπ‘–π‘›
𝑣
𝑆𝑓𝑠 𝑙𝑓
π‘‘πœŽ
+ 𝑉𝑣 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ‚π‘£ 1 −
𝑣
𝑆𝑏
𝑑𝛽
= 0.0011137 1/𝑑𝑒𝑔
25. Vertical Tail Airfoil: NACA-0009
a) Choose symmetric airfoil as the vertical tail should behave in a similar manner when at a
positive or negative angle-of-attack
b) To minimize structure and weight, choose airfoil with smallest thickness that meets 𝐢𝐿 𝛼
𝑣 π‘šπ‘–π‘›
c) Refer to symmetric airfoil plots when choosing the horizontal tail airfoil
𝐢𝑙 𝛼 =
Δ𝐢𝐿 𝑣
Δ𝛼
NACA-0009 (As Stabilizer not Airfoil, from XFLR5)
𝛼 (deg)
𝐢𝐿 𝑣
0
0
5.00
0.314
𝐢𝐿 𝛼 = 0.1214 [1/deg]
𝑣
26. Vertical Stabilizer Geometry
27. Overall Aircraft Directional Stability
Criterion for Directional Static Stability
𝐢𝑛 𝛽 =
𝑑𝐢𝑛
>0
𝑑𝛽
𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = 𝐢𝑛 𝛽
𝑀𝑓
+ 𝐢𝑛 𝛽
𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = −π‘˜π‘› π‘˜π‘…π‘™
𝑣
𝑆𝑓𝑠 𝑙𝑓
π‘‘πœŽ
+ 𝑉𝑣 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ‚π‘£ 1 −
𝑣
𝑆𝑏
𝑑𝛽
π‘ͺ𝒏 𝜷 𝟏/𝒓𝒂𝒅
0.2847
Download