Analysis and Mitigation of Subsynchronous Resonance Involving

advertisement
Analysis and Mitigation of
Subsynchronous Resonance
Involving Type-III Wind Turbines
Ignacio Vieto and Jian Sun
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
1
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
Wind Power Conversion
Subsynchronous Resonance
Impedance Models
Impedance Based Analysis of SSR
SSR Damping
Summary
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
2
Wind Power Generation
Type-I Wind Turbine
Fixed Speed
SCIG
PMSG
Type-II Wind Turbine
WRIG
Type-IV Wind Turbine
Type-III Wind Turbine
WRIG
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
3
Type-III System, Detail
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
4
ERCOT 2009 SSR
50% Compensation Lines
Highlighted
Lon Hill
1. Ajo-Nelson Tripped
2. Ajo Wind Farm is Radially
Connected to Rio Hondo
3. Voltages Increase Up to 1.95 pu
Nelson
Line fault
ia
ib
Ajo
ic
Edinburg
va
vb
vc
Rio Hondo
Massimo Bongiorno, ‘The impact of Wind Farms on Subsynchronous Resonance in Power Systems’, Gothia Power AB
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
5
DFIG Sub-Synchronous Resonance
RSC + Machine
•
•
•
Most significant
turbine component
for SSR.
RSC is also the best
prospect of using
turbines own
controls for reducing
SSR.
Converter interacts
with the power grid
though induction
machine.
π‘…π‘Ÿ
πΏπ‘™π‘Ÿ
𝐿𝑙𝑠
Power Grid
𝑅𝑠
𝐿𝑝
GSC
•
𝑉𝑑𝑐
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
•
High impedance
compared to RSC
Not significant for
SSR studies or
mitigation
strategies
6
DFIG Currents during SSR
Stator Currents
0.88
pu/div
0
ia
ib
ib
ic
ic
60 Hz
8 Hz
20
Ii/I1 (%)
Ii/I1 (%)
ia
10
8
6
4
2
Rotor Currents
40
60
Frequency (Hz)
80
100
10
8
6
4
2
0
12 Hz
20
64 Hz
40
60
80
100
Frequency (Hz)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
7
Turbine Models
Below fundamental, Positive Sequence
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ 𝑁𝑠 2
𝑅′π‘Ÿ
𝑠 𝐿𝑠 + 𝐿′π‘Ÿ + 𝑅𝑠 +
+
π»π‘Ÿπ‘– π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
𝑁
𝜎
𝑠
𝜎
𝑠
π‘Ÿ
𝑃
𝑃
𝑍𝑝1 𝑠 =
𝑁𝑠
𝑉
𝐼
1 − 1π‘Ÿ 𝐺𝑃𝐿 π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ π»π‘Ÿπ‘– π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ 1π‘Ÿ + 1
π‘π‘Ÿ
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
2πœŽπ‘ƒ 𝑠
Above fundamental, Positive Sequence
𝑍𝑝2 𝑠 =
𝑉 π‘˜
𝑁
𝑅′ π‘Ÿ
𝑠(𝐿𝑠 + 𝐿′π‘Ÿ ) + 𝑅𝑠 +
+ 𝑑𝑐 π‘šπ‘Ÿ 𝑠
πœŽπ‘ (𝑠)
πœŽπ‘ (𝑠) π‘π‘Ÿ
∗
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
1−
𝐺 𝑠 − π‘—πœ”1
2πœŽπ‘ (𝑠) 𝑃𝐿
𝑁𝑠
π‘π‘Ÿ
2
π»π‘Ÿπ‘– 𝑠 − π‘—πœ”1 − π‘—πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ 𝐻 𝑠 − π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑗𝐾𝑑
𝐼1π‘Ÿ
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
∗
+1
Negative Sequence
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ 𝑁𝑠 2
𝑅′ π‘Ÿ
𝑠(𝐿𝑙 + 𝐿′π‘Ÿ ) + 𝑅𝑠 +
+
π»π‘Ÿπ‘– 𝑠 + 𝑗 πœ”1 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
π‘π‘Ÿ
πœŽπ‘› (𝑠)
πœŽπ‘› 𝑠
𝑍𝑛 𝑠 =
∗
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
𝑁𝑠
𝐼
1−
𝐺𝑃𝐿 𝑠 + 𝑗 πœ”1
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ π»π‘Ÿπ‘– 𝑠 + 𝑗 πœ”1 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ 1π‘Ÿ + 1
π‘π‘Ÿ
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
2πœŽπ‘› 𝑠
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
8
System Parameters
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
𝑉𝑠
690 V
𝑉𝑑𝑐
1500 V
f
60 Hz
𝑅𝑠
0.929 mΩ
𝐼𝑠
3740
𝑅𝑅
5.8 mΩ
Turns Ratio
0.34:1
𝐿𝑙𝑠
54.7 µH
Pole Pairs
3
πΏπ‘™π‘Ÿ
462 µH
Mac. Speed
2160 RPM
𝐿𝑀
1.6 mH
πΎπ‘π‘Ÿ
0.0518
𝐾𝑑
−8.2 ∗ 10−3
πΎπ‘–π‘Ÿ
3.8462
π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ
2.5 ∗ 10−4
𝐾𝑝𝑝
0.7886
𝐾𝑖𝑝
2495
RSC BW
100 Hz
RSC PM
60°
PLL BW
50 Hz
PLL PM
45°
πΏπ‘”π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘
0.5 pu
Compensation
50%
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
9
DFIG Model for SSR
Magnitude (db)
Phase (deg)
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ 𝑁𝑠 2
𝑅′π‘Ÿ
𝑠 𝐿𝑠 + 𝐿′π‘Ÿ + 𝑅𝑠 +
+
π»π‘Ÿπ‘– π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
𝑁
𝜎
𝑠
𝜎
𝑠
π‘Ÿ
𝑃
𝑃
𝑍𝑝1 𝑠 =
𝑁𝑠
𝑉
𝐼
1 − 1π‘Ÿ 𝐺𝑃𝐿 π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠
𝑉𝑑𝑐 π‘˜π‘šπ‘Ÿ π»π‘Ÿπ‘– π‘—πœ”1 − 𝑠 + 𝑗 πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ 1π‘Ÿ + 1
π‘π‘Ÿ
𝑉1π‘Ÿ
2πœŽπ‘ƒ 𝑠
~0°
Frequency
Frequency
Red: Positive Sequence Turbine
Purple: Grid Impedance
Black: Negative Sequence Turbine Dots: Measured
Line: Model
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
10
Impedance Ratio Nyquist Plot
𝑍𝑔 𝑠
𝑍𝑃1 𝑠
Stator Currents
~0° Phase
Margin
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
11
SSR
Range
Phase (deg)
Magnitude (db)
DFIG Model Analysis
Frequency
SSR
Range
Frequency
Red: Positive Sequence Turbine Dark Red: Positive Sequence Machine Passives
• In the SSR range machine inductance dominates.
• SSR falls into converter control bandwidth:
• Turbine impedance can be modified through RSC controls.
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
12
SSR Damping Methods
• Static Var Compensator at wind farm terminals
– (H. Xie and M. Oliveira, 2014)
• STATCOM damping at wind farm terminals
– (A. Moharana, R. Varma and R. Seethapathy, 2014)
• Damping through power electronics controls
– GSC damping using series capacitor voltage
(H. Mohammadpour and E. Santi, 2015)
– RSC damping using dq-axis rotor voltages
(A. Leon and J. Solsona, 2015)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
13
Wind Farm
SVC SSR Damping
SSR damping
Power Grid
SVC
Damping
OFF
Damping ON
• Controls susceptance based on local variables,
e.g. line power
• Susceptance response is non linear, and depends
on operating conditions
• Needs the installation TSC
• With enough information, its effective over a
wide power and wind speed spectrum.
Hailian Xie, “Mitigation of SSR in Presence of Wind Power and Series compensation by SVC”, 2014 POWERCON, Chengdu
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
14
STATCOM SSR Damping
Wind Farm
STATCOM Control
Power Grid
STATCOM
•
•
•
•
STATCOM is tuned to stabilize electrical modes of
the complete system.
Requires detailed knowledge of the wind farm
parameters and operating conditions.
Fine-tuning of parameters is done by hand using
EMT simulations.
STATCOM gives a lot of flexibility to adjust
system eigenvalues and stabilize it.
A. Moharana, “SSR Alleviation by STATCOM in Induction-Generator-Based Wind Farm Connected to Series Compensated Lines”, 2014 Trans. Sust. Energ.
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
15
Damping Though Turbine Controls
Local variables
•
•
•
Obtain chosen control signals.
No damping
Damping approach determines
which measurements to use and
where to inject signal.
Can be applied to RSC or GSC.
Does not need external
equipment.
Damping Signal can be inserted at any
corresponding part of the controller.
Capacitor voltage compensation Injected at GSC
voltage regulator
H. Mohammadpour, “SSR Damping Controller Desing and Optimal Placement in RSC and GSC of Series Compensated DFIG
Based Wind Farm”, 2015 Trans. Sust. Energ.
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
16
Virtual Impedance Damping
• Approach:
– Use rotor dq-axis currents (already measured)
– Obtain voltage drop for currents through an equivalent impedance.
π‘‰π‘‘π‘ž = πΌπ‘‘π‘ž ⋅ 𝑍𝑑 𝑠
– Inject voltage terms into controller output.
• Modify turbine impedance to add phase margin
• Does not need eigenvalue analysis of turbine system
• Impedance of systems with complex/unknown controls can be
scanned instead of modelled
• Virtual impedance can be filtered and narrowed to not affect
fundamental or higher frequencies
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
17
Virtual Rotor Impedance Damping
π‘…π‘Ÿ
𝑍𝑑
𝐿𝑙𝑠
πΏπ‘™π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
−
abc
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ −
dq
πœƒπ‘ƒπΏ − πœƒπ‘Ÿ
abc
dq
πœƒπ‘ƒπΏ − πœƒπ‘Ÿ
Σ
−
𝑍𝑑 𝑠 =
πΎπ‘π‘Ÿ + πΎπ‘–π‘Ÿ /𝑠
Σ
πœ”1
πΎπ‘π‘Ÿ + πΎπ‘–π‘Ÿ /𝑠
Σ
Magnitude (dB)
𝑉𝑑𝑐
Power Grid
𝑅𝑠
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
Σ
−
Σ
Σ
−
πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
−
𝑍𝑑 𝑠
πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ
𝑍𝑑 𝑠
𝑠𝑅
𝑠
𝑠
1+
1+
πœ”1
πœ”2
𝑅
πœ”1
πœ”2
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
frequency
18
Damped Impedance
Magnitude (db)
Phase (deg)
Turbine impedance with a negative virtual resistance as damping
20°
Frequency
Frequency
Red: Positive Sequence Turbine
Purple: Grid Impedance
Black: Negative Sequence Turbine Dots: Measured
Line: Model
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
19
Virtual Stator Impedance
πΏπ‘™π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
−
abc
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ −
dq
πœƒπ‘ƒπΏ − πœƒπ‘Ÿ
abc
dq
πœƒπ‘ƒπΏ − πœƒπ‘Ÿ
Σ
−
𝐿𝑙𝑠
Σ
πΎπ‘π‘Ÿ + πΎπ‘–π‘Ÿ /𝑠
𝑍𝑑
𝑍𝑑 𝑠 = πœŽπ‘ 𝑠
πœ”1
πΎπ‘π‘Ÿ + πΎπ‘–π‘Ÿ /𝑠
Σ
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
Σ
−
Σ
Σ
−
πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
−
𝑍𝑑 𝑠
πΎπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ
𝑍𝑑 𝑠
𝑠𝑅
𝑠
𝑠
1+
1+
πœ”1
πœ”2
Magnitude (dB)
π‘…π‘Ÿ
𝑉𝑑𝑐
Power Grid
𝑅𝑠
πΌπ‘žπ‘Ÿ
πΌπ‘‘π‘Ÿ
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
frequency
20
Undamped Resonance, Zoomed
10 Hz Resonance
Current (A)
Total Output Currents (2kA/div)
Strong grid
Fault
Compensated weak grid
Time (s)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
21
Undamped Resonance
Current (A)
Total Output Currents (2kA/div)
Fault
Time (s)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
22
Damped Resonance
Current (A)
Total Output Currents (2kA/div)
Fault
Time (s)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
23
SSR, Subcynchronous Operation
Magnitude (db)
Phase (deg)
The SSR phenomenon is present also when the generator operates
below synchronous speed.
Frequency
Frequency
Red: Positive Sequence Turbine
Black: Negative Sequence Turbine
Purple: Grid Impedance
Line: Model
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
24
Damped Simulation, SuperS Oper.
18 Hz Resonance
Current (A)
Total Output Currents (2kA/div)
SSR Control OFF
SSR Control ON
Time (s)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
25
SSR Control d-axis Output
Voltage (V)
SSR Control output when connected to an ideal grid (no resonance)
Steady-state output: 211V
SSR Control Output (0.1/div)
Time (s)
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
26
Damping Stator Impedance
Magnitude (db)
Phase (deg)
Shaping stator impedance is more drastic, but to implement it,
controls needs to consider machine airgap
Frequency
Frequency
Red: Virtual Rotor Resistance
Black: Virtual Stator Resistance
Purple: Grid Impedance
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
27
Summary
• SSR in type-III wind turbines was explained
and analyzed using turbine impedance.
• Turbine impedance was modified through
controllers to damp the resonance.
• Future Work:
– More robust control actions that can emulate
impedances on rotor or stator side
– Use damping as part of stability studies in heavily
compensated weak grids.
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
28
End of Presentation
This work is supported in part by the National
Science Foundation under Award #ECCS1002265
CFES Annual Conference 02-26-2015
29
Download