Carl Zeiss NTS AURIGA CrossBeam und EVO am MPA Stuttgart Stefan Bueble Carl Zeiss SMT Enabling the Nano-Age World® Feature Size Market >1m Human Carl Zeiss SMT 1µm (1m/106) 1 pm (1m/1012) MPA Stuttgart 2010 Life Style Classical Optics Biomedical Sciences and Health Care Optical Microscopy Semiconductor Optical Litho AIMS Mask Repair/ CE Life Science Materials Analysis Biomedical Sciences Semiconductor SEM/CrossBeam He-Ion Microscopy TEM Ant (2 mm) 1mm (1m/103) 1nm (1m/109) Products Pollen (~50 µm) Flue virus (~100 nm) Hair (~50 µm) Bacteria (a few µm) Mask (100 nm) Structured IC (<100 nm) DNA (to 1nm) Atom (to 0,1 nm) Page 2 Introduction: Product Portfolio FE SEM CrossBeam® HIM LIBRA EFTEM With courtesy of AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 3 CrossBeam® Product Line NVision® 40 NEON® 40 EsB Auriga™ MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 4 CrossBeam® Series AURIGATM – Information Beyond Resolution AURIGA, “The Charioteer” MPA Stuttgart 2010 Constellation in the Northern Hemisphere Located next to GEMINI constellation Page 5 CrossBeam® Series AURIGATM – Information Beyond Resolution ZEISS next generation CrossBeam® platform .... AURIGA New concept New FIB column New multi-purpose chamber New GIS Proven ULTRAplus FE-SEM platform MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 6 AURIGA – The next Generation MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 7 AURIGA – The next Generation Modularity – Options Full analytical flexibility EsB - detector Charge Compensation » GIS integrated » UltraPlus-solution FIB EDS: 3 ports Omniprobe lift-out system: 4 ports MonoGIS: Upper port, SIMS- & GIS-port SIMS 4 QBSD / STEM / Cryo / EBSD: 3 ports Several MP-ports for electrical or cryo feed-throughs » Canion » Cobra GIS » ZEISS GIS » MonoGIS Airlock » Zeiss airlock (80mm) » 100mm airlock Misc Ion detector, STEM, 4QBSD, SIMS, EDS, EBSD, Cryo, CL, micromanipulators … MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 8 Electron Optics MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 9 Beam Sample Interaction MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 10 Beam Sample Interaction – Influence of Beam Energy 5kV 1kV 10kV Monte Carlo simulation of the beam – sample interaction for a Si sample at 1kV and 10kV. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 12 Beam Sample Interaction – Influence of Beam Energy Platinum Rhodium Alloy Crystals at 1kV (left) and at 20kV (right) MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 13 Electron Optics Operating principle of the Gemini column UEx U0 Condenser lens Beam booster Magnetic lens Scan coils Electrostatic lens Specimen MPA Stuttgart 2010 Features highly stable thermal FEG < 0.5 % /h variation Electromagnetic aperture changer In-lens SE-detector Beam path with no intermediate cross over UL low beam noise <1% cross over free beam path no significant Boersch effect, high depth of field beam booster superb image resolution throughout the whole beam energy range, particularly down to 100 eV. High resistance to ambient magnetic stray fields Page 15 Electron Optics 25 Aberration Coefficients [mm] The Gemini principle 20 Spherical 15 10 Chromatic 5 0 0 Magnetic lens 5 10 15 20 25 30 Beam Energy [KeV] Electrostatic lens Principle of the compound magnetic/electrostatic objective lens with its optical equivalence No Magnetic field at the sample!! Constant conditions@all kV! MPA Stuttgart 2010 Probe Size: d P dS2 dC2 dd2 M d g 2 Spherical aberration: dS 0.5 CS 3 Chromatic aberration: dC CC Diffraction Error: dd U U 1 Page 16 Electron Optics NOTE: twin structures at 510 volts MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 17 Beam Sample Interaction BSE SE LLE AE 50eV 2keV E=E0 Electron Energy MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 18 Gemini - CDS (Complete Detection System) EsB Inlens Magnetic lens Electrostatic lens AsB STEM MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 19 High resolution low voltage SE imaging Resist Structure on a Silicon Wafer, uncoated, 0.8kV MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 20 High resolution low voltage SE imaging Barley chromosome prepared by fixation, critical point drying, and immuno labeling of spindle apparatus. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Sample courtesy of Prof. Wanner, MPI München Page 21 High resolution low voltage SE imaging Magnetic materials High resolution image of a TiN / YbN Multilayer on a magnetic steel substrate MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 22 Ultra low voltage imaging at 20 Volts MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 23 High resolution SE imaging This is not a Silicon (111) HR-TEM image! Uncoated PTFE (Teflon) macro molecules imaged by in-lens detector. Spacing between molecules is 20 Å. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 24 Electron Optics Gemini® with EsB A new detection principle for the GEMINI column Energy and angle selective BSE detection EsB MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 25 Gemini - CDS (Complete Detection System) EsB Inlens Magnetic lens Electrostatic lens AsB STEM MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 26 Electron Optics SE deflection by continuous variation of Filter Grid energy has no influence on the primary electrons Continuous mixing with any other detector is possible MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 27 Beam Sample Interaction BSE SE LLE AE 50eV 2keV E=E0 Electron Energy Target is to separate both informations MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 28 High resolution low voltage BSE detection In-lens SE image Image taken from In-lens SE detector showing high degree of topographical information MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 29 High resolution low voltage BSE detection EsB Backscatter image MPA Stuttgart 2010 In-lens SE image Page 30 High resolution low voltage SE detection W - plug Inlens image 1.2kV MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 31 High resolution low voltage BSE detection Poly Si TiN SiO Si W - plug Inlens backscatter image 1.2kV MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 32 Gemini - CDS (Complete Detection System) EsB Inlens Magnetic lens Electrostatic lens AsB STEM MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 34 4QBSD (AsB) Detector Gold particles AsB Image MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 35 Image analysis Applications (SE) R/W DVD surface @ 1.58 kV, WD 2mm In-lens SE MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 36 Image analysis Applications (BSD) R/W DVD surface @ 1.58 kV, WD 2mm EsB MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 37 Ion Detection 150 pA In-Lens FIB SE Image 150 pA Elion FIB SI Image Sample: Nickel based superalloy exhibiting intergranular corrosion secondary ion yields for most metals increase by ~ 10X to 1000X (typically ~ 50X) in the presence of electronegative species such as oxygen in particular. This makes secondary ion imaging very sensitive to the presence of corrosion, especially at grain boundaries, and makes detection of this corrosion very fast. This oxygen enhanced yield dominates other contrast mechanisms in ion imaging of metals MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 38 Gemini - CDS (Complete Detection System) EsB Inlens Magnetic lens Electrostatic lens AsB STEM MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 39 Automated Sample Preparation MPA Stuttgart 2010 TEM sample fabricated completely unattended (time to sample: 30min) Page 40 CrossBeam® TEM Sample Preparation MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 41 STEM Imaging STEM bright field image of a semiconductor MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 42 STEM Imaging Flash memory Bright field image MPA Stuttgart 2010 Darkfield image Page 43 TEM Sample Preparation - STEM Imaging MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 44 STEM Imaging STEM images of a kidney cross section, bright-field mode. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 45 STEM Imaging Inlens Image STEM Image Nanotubes in Gemini STEM - Nickel as catalyst in single wall nanotubes MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 46 STEM Imaging Nanotubes in Gemini STEM - Nickel as catalyst in single wall nanotubes MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 47 STEM Imaging Nanotubes in Gemini STEM MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 48 Ion Optics Ion Optics MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 49 The LMIS (Liquid Metal Ion Source) W – Tip Taylor cone Extractor Ion Beam The LMIS usually consists of a blunt W field emitter with an end radius of about 10µm, which is coated with a metal having a high surface tension and a low vapour pressure at its melting point. The field emitter is heated to the melting point of the metal while a high positive voltage (3-10kV) is placed on it relative to the extraction electrode. The liquid metal is drawn into a conical shape by the balance between the electrostatic and surface tension forces. The apex of the liquid metal is drawn to an end radius of a few nm. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 50 The LMIS (Liquid Metal Ion Source) SEM Micrograph of the liquid metal ion source (LMIS) showing a W needle and a spiral reservoir spot welded to a heating loop. The reservoir is about 3mm long and contains enough liquid Ga to last for about 1500h of operation at a total emission current of 1µA. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 51 Gas Injection System MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 52 Working principle of the local charge compensator MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 53 Local Charge Compensator with 2 gases Dry Nitrogen for Charge compensation Ozone gas for sample surface cleaning After 10 min oxygen cleaning Applications generated by Jörg Stodolka MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 54 In-Situ cleaning while image acquisition Requirements: • contamination predominant in chamber • intensity of cleaning can be reduced as carbon generation is mitigated immediately 100nm In-Lens image of Au on C sample, deliberately contaminated prior to loading, image acquired without oxygen flow, 1kV, WD 5mm at 150 kX mag after 1min scanning at 600kX: contamination visible MPA Stuttgart 2010 100nm In-Lens image of same Au on C sample, now acquired with oxygen flow, 1kV, WD 5mm at 150 kX mag after 1min scanning at 600kX: no formation of contamination visible Page 55 Charge Compensation Careful EHT & pressure tuning visualizes the doping basins and diffusion barrier MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 56 Charge Compensation EDS Analysis – Turbine Blades EDS Analysis at 15kV with charge compensation. MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 57 AURIGA – The next Generation Sample: ZrO2 Charge compensation EHT=15kV c) Analytics (e.g. EDS) CC off Cut-off at ~6.5kV CC on Cut-off at ~14kV Surface charging shifts the cut-off voltage of bremsstrahlung („Duane-Hunt limit“) down to ~6.5kV Also no detection of any characteristic X-rays for elemental analysis possible above this cut-off voltage CC on: No EDS restrictions MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 58 Cross Sections Cross Section of a Flash Memory (SEM image during polish) MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 59 Cross Sections AMD Opteron Processor (FIB image) MPA Stuttgart 2010 With courtesy of AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG Page 60 Cross Sections Semiconductors SEM image MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 61 MPA Stuttgart 2010 Page 62