San Diego State University
Dual Language and English Learner Education
DLE 515 Theories and Practice in Multilingual Education
Course Syllabus
Semester:
Meeting Time:
Meeting Place:
Instructors:
Email:
Office Hours:
Spring 2016
Wednesday, 7:00p – 9:40p
EBA 443
Robert Pollack, M. Ed.
Rpollack@mail.sdsu.edu
By Appointment
Course Description:
This course is designed to provide participants with a foundational understanding of multilingualism
and multilingual education. The course will advance pre-service teachers’ understanding of the
pedagogical and programmatic practices for addressing linguistic and academic needs of multilingual
learners. Historical and theoretical foundations related to language education programs to include
analysis of instruction, curriculum, and assessment. Participants will engage in critical analysis and
discussion of: (1) key historical and legal events leading to bilingual education and equality of
educational opportunity for emergent bilinguals; (2) sociocultural characteristics of ethno-linguistic
students’ school communities; (3) key educational principles guiding theoretical frameworks and
practices of bilingual and dual-language education; (4) programmatic and pedagogical practices for
building on the linguistic, sociolinguistic, and academic strengths and addressing the needs of English
language learners or emergent bilinguals.
Course Objectives and Learning Outcomes:
1. Describe and analyze the philosophical and constitutional bases that support educational
equity and bilingual education for language minority students. (TPE: 7, 8, 13, 14, 15)
(KDS 1, 2, 4, 5)
2. Research and analyze the sociocultural characteristics of the school community of
ethno-linguistic student and develop a sociocultural profile of an ethnically diverse
school community. (TPE: 7, 8, 11, 13, 16) (KDS 2, 3, 5)
3. Examine, describe, and analyze theoretical and pedagogical principles supporting
bilingual education theory that support multilingualism and bi-cognitive development of
students. (TPE: 7, 8, 13, 15) (KDS 1, 2, 3, 4)
4. Examine, discuss and analyze pedagogical and programmatic practices (assessment,
development of first and second language, cognition, program effectiveness) for
addressing the linguistic and academic needs of limited English proficient and
underachieving students. (TPE: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15) (KDS 1, 2, 4, 5)
5. Compare and contrast conceptual program designs that address the linguistic and
academic development of language minority students and the characteristics of these
programs to first and second language acquisition. (TPE: 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15) (KDS 2,
3, 4, 5)
Required Text:
De Jong, E. J. (2011). Foundations for Multilingualism in Education: From Principles to Practice.
Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.
Role of the Instructor:
In order to facilitate learning and a climate for sharing ideas and experiences in teaching in the
multilingual setting, instructor will make presentations and facilitate interaction among participants
through discussion and small group activities. It is assumed that each participant brings to the course a
wealth of diverse knowledge and resources that will be pooled to experience in order to examine the
field of multilingual education through multiple perspectives.
Daily Meeting Format:
The class will involve whole and small group interaction and incorporate fieldwork experiences in
school communities. The assessment of course objectives will be made by course instructor. In order
to facilitate participants’ continued development of academic/professional language proficiencies, the
course will be taught in English and Spanish, although this may vary depending on the make-up and
linguistic profile of course participants.
As we collectively engage in dialogue, reflect on Ramon Ruiz’s, The Four Agreements, which include:
Be Impeccable to your Word
Speak with integrity. Say only what you mean. Avoid using the Word to speak against yourself or to
gossip about others.
Don’t take anything personally
Nothing others do is because of you. What others say and do is a projection of their own reality.
Don’t Make Assumptions
Find the courage to ask questions and to express what you really want. Communicate with others as
clearly as you can to avoid misunderstandings, sadness, and drama.
Always do your Best
Your best is going to change from moment to moment; it will be different when you are healthy as
opposed to sick. Under any circumstance, simply do your best.
Course Requirements:
Requirement:
Value:
1. Informed Participation & Attendance
25%
2. Written Reflections
30%
3. Chapter Lead Discussion
10%
4. Linguistic Autobiography*
20%
TPE: 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15
KDS: 1, 3, 4, 5
5. Community Scan*
15%
TPE: 7, 8, 11, 13, 16)
KDS: 1, 2, 3, 5
* Refer to the assignment evaluation rubrics at the end of this document.
Due:
Every Meeting
Every Meeting
Once
Midterm
Final
Grade Equivalencies:
A = (94-100%)
A- = (90-93%)
B+ = (87-89%)
B = (83-86%)
B- = (80-82%)
C = (70-79%)
D = (60-69%)
As a future bilingual credential student, you are expected to produce high quality work that does not
fall lower than a “C.” The grade of “A” signifies exemplary work that meets and exceeds expectations
in all aspects of the course. An “A” will be assigned for excellent, outstanding achievement, meaning
that the student has met and exceeded the requirements of the assignment with exceptional
thoughtfulness, critical insight, and attention to detail. Due dates are provided in the course schedule.
Students with Disabilities:
If you are a student with a disability and believe you will need accommodations for this class, it is your
responsibility to contact Student Disability Services at (619) 594-6473. To avoid any delay in the
receipt of your accommodations, you should contact Student Disability Services as soon as possible.
Please note that accommodations are not retroactive and that accommodations based upon disability
cannot be provided until you have presented your instructor with an accommodation letter from Student
Disability Services. Your cooperation is appreciated.
Description of Course Requirements:
1. Informed Participation & Attendance (25%)
Attendance, adequate preparation, active reading, and participation are necessary elements to succeed
in class and to accomplish your educational and professional goals in the program. When discussing
with your colleagues, please follow these ground rules: use gender neutral language; avoid language
that devalues or denigrates any person or group; be precise and careful with terminology and
phraseology; give other students a break (if they say something with which you disagree, make your
own opposing perspective known in a way that they may be able to hear you). Base discussion on close
reading of the texts and claim the authority of life experience, but do not assume such experience is
universal. Recognize that alternative perspectives based on other life experiences do exist. Thus
different people will reach different conclusions about “reality” and what is “normal.” Always question
your own beliefs and assumptions as well as others.
Please refrain from using electronic devices for purposes unrelated to class discussions during class
unless three is an emergency.
Students are required to sign in at the beginning of each class. You must notify instructor beforehand if
you need to leave before the end of a class. Students will be allowed ONE unexcused absence per
semester. Please note that 5% points will be deducted from your total final grade for each additional
absence incurred unless it is due to a critical/emergency situation. In the event of an absence, it is the
student’s responsibility to obtain course notes, assignments, and materials missed from a peer enrolled
in the course. Students may also consult with the course instructor when/if needed.
2. Written Reflections (30%)
Each student is to reflect and respond to 10 guiding question provided weekly by the instructor.
Guiding questions will connect to readings and class discussions. Each reflection should be one-page
(typed, double-spaced, and 12 pt. New Roman font). May be submitted in English or Spanish.
Reflections must include date, chapter, and question number when applicable. Reflections submitted
late will be penalized half of the points earned.
As you read various texts required for the course, do so purposefully. All students should integrate key
terms from the reading and class discussions in writing when relevant. Find the links between the
readings, your academic/professional goals, and course assignments. Below are some questions to
guide your reading of the course material, in particular the chapters in de Jong (2011):
1. What is the purpose of the work?
2. What are the key ideas/arguments the author makes and how does the author support these?
3. What are implications of the work for policy and/or practice?
4. What is the relevance of the work for your academic and professional development?
5. Are there any ideas in the text you think should be furthered clarified or addressed?
3. Chapter Lead Discussion (10%)
In preparing for a 15 to 30 minute presentation of an assigned chapter in de Jong, each course
participant will prepare a 1-page (single spaced) summary to be distributed to fellow course
participants. Some guidelines in completing your summary are as follows:
• Give the HEADLINE –with your words what describes the focus of the chapter.
• What is the PURPOSE of the chapter?
• What are the MAIN QUESTIONS and CONCEPTS raised in the chapter?
• Select one or two sentences that you feel are the most SIGNIFICANT. Explain WHY you
selected these sentences?
• What are the IMPLICATIONS for policy, professional development, and school/classroom
practices?
In leading a discussion, the presenter(s) will design an activity for capturing classmate’s interest and
participation. The presenter is responsible for exercising leadership in moving the discussion forward.
The main goal of the activity is to facilitate substantive discussion about the content of the chapter and
its relevance for theory, practice, and/or policy related to multilingualism and/or multilingual
education. *For you assigned chapter presentation, you do not need to turn in the assigned written
reflection.
4. Linguistic Autobiography (20%)
Based on Chapter 3 in De Jong (2011) and “Application and Reflection” prompt #4 on p. 80,
participants will:
1. Write a 3-5 page “linguistic autobiography” (typed, double-spaced, and 12 pt. New Roman
font). May be submitted in English or Spanish.
2. Create a 5-minute presentation that addresses the prompt.
See rubric in appendix for more information. Some ideas taken from:
http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/~rosemary/55-fall2003-autobiography.pdf
The kinds of details you include will vary according to your background and experience. If you speak
more than one language you could write about the order in which you learned the different languages,
how you learned each of them, how well you speak each and on what occasions you use each language,
etc. You could also write about what variety of English/Spanish (other language) you speak. For
example, have you noticed that you use different words or have different pronunciations of words than
English or Spanish speakers from somewhere else? You could thus talk about where you are from and
what variety of English/Spanish (other language) you grew up speaking in that place or places. With or
without going into your own native language (English or another) you could talk about your family’s
linguistic heritage. Where are your ancestors from? What languages did they speak? Relating to any of
these possible topics you could also express your feelings about the languages and varieties of
languages you discuss. How do you feel about your heritage language(s) and your ability or lack
thereof to speak it/them? Is there an issue in your family about who speaks what language to whom?
Are you proud or embarrassed about your native dialect of English/Spanish or another language? Do
you ever consciously change your pronunciation or choice of word when talking to certain other
speakers?
5. Community Scan (15%)
Participants will work in teams to develop a school community profile presentation using Ochoa’s
Community Scan Guide. The community profile research examines five specific areas (demographic,
cultural, associational, influence, and socio-attitudinal) of the school Community. The culminating
assignment includes a 5 to 10 page community profile report and a 15 to 30-minute presentation. May
be submitted and presented in English or Spanish. See rubric in appendix for more information. Each
presentation should include each of the sections listed below.
• Introduction: Identify school community and methods or approaches to research.
• Demographic characteristics
• Cultural characteristics
• Associational patterns
• Influence patterns
• Socio-attitudinal factors
• Concluding section: Discuss how the above community dimensions relate directly to:
(a) Curriculum change in culturally and linguistically diverse schools.
(b) Modeling effective bilingual communication skill and bicultural values.
(c) Participating in community activities available to students and teachers;
(d) Using community resources to support student learning.
(e) Involving families, parents, and community members in student learning.
Tentative Course Schedule:
Week: Dates: Topics:
1
1/20


Course Introduction
Innovation and 21st
Century Skills
2
1/27


Democratic Education
Educators as Language
Decision Makers and
Negotiators
3
2/3

Linguistic Diversity and
Globalization
Activity



Syllabus Overview
Innovation IQ TEST
Linguistic Diversity
ASKING RIGHT Qs
ART
 Chapter Lead
Discussion
 Global Competence
VALUEs
Stereotypes
ENGLISH MANIA


4
2/10

Multilingualism and
Multilingual
Development



5
2/17

Affirming Identities in
Multilingual Schools
6
2/24

Linguistic
Autobiographies
7
3/2


Language in Education
Linguistic
Autobiography
Presentations


Language Policy in the
United States
Linguistic
Autobiography
Presentations

Program Models and
Outcomes

8
3/9

9
3/16






Readings &
Assignments Due:
 None



Chapter Lead
Discussion
NAZA

Chapter Lead
Discussion
Deliberation:
Schooled Literacy
Ideologies
Linguistic
Autobiography
Overview

Chapter Lead
Discussion
Connecting Creativity
Linguistic
Autobiography
Presentations
Danger of One Story
Chapter Lead
Discussion
Linguistic
Autobiography
Presentations

Chapter Lead
Discussion
Linguistic
Autobiography
Presentations

Chapter Lead
Discussion









Read: De Jong,
Chapter 1
Read: Democratic
Education, Bell
Hooks**
Written Reflection 1
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 4
Written Reflection 2
Read: Schooled
Literacy Ideologies,
Cadiero Kaplan**
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 3
Written Reflection 3
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 9
Written Reflection 4
Linguistic
Autobiography
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 5
Written Reflection 5
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 6
Written Reflection 6
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 7
10
11
3/23
3/30
4/6



Promoting Additive
Multilingualism
Spring Break
Structuring for
Integration


Guest Speaker
Community Scan
Overview


Submit written
reflection by email
(Class does not meet)
No Class
Chapter Lead
Discussion
Deliberation:
Language Education










Read: Ochoa
Community Scan
Written Reflection 7
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 10
Written Reflection 8
None
Read: De Jong,
Chapter 10
Written Reflection 9
12
4/13

Pedagogy


Guest Speaker
Community Scan
Workshop


Read: Olsen**
Written Reflection
10
13
4/20

Multiculturalism and
Literature


Guest Speaker
Community Scan
Workshop

Read: TBD**
14
4/27

Community Scan

Community Scan
Presentations

Community Scan
15
5/4

Community Scan

Community Scan
Presentations
Closure

None
Submit written
reflection by email

Written Reflection
11

Finals
5/11

Final Reflection
**These readings will be provided by the instructor.

Appendix
Rubric 1: Written Reflection (30%)
Criterion
Addresses the guiding question.
Includes key issues addressed in the chapter and class
discussions.
Highlights key terms addressed in the chapter and class
discussions.
Yes
(1 points)
No
(0 point)
Appendix
Rubric 2: Chapter Lead Discussion (10%)
Criterion
Does the presenter(s) give the HEADLINE –
with own words what describe the focus of the
chapter.
Does the presenter(s) identify the PURPOSE of
the chapter?
Does the presenter(s) address the MAIN
QUESTIONS and CONCEPTS raised in the
chapter?
Does the presenter(s) select and explain one or
two sentences that you/they feel are the most
SIGNIFICANT.
Does the presenter(s) discuss the
IMPLICATIONS for policy, professional
development, and/or school/classroom practices?
Yes
(2 points)
Indirectly
(1 point)
No
(0 points)
Appendix
Rubric 3: Linguistic Autobiography (20%)
Criterion
Excellent
(4 points)
Very Good
(3 points)
Good/Fair
(2 points)
Unacceptable
(1 point)
Auto-ethnographer follows
questions in de Jong (p.80) as a
springboard for writing and
presenting her/his linguistic
autobiography.
Auto-ethnographer
follows prompts as
a springboard for
writing/presenting
her/his linguistic
autobiography.
N/A
N/A
Auto-ethnographer
does not follow
any prompts as a
springboard for
writing/presenting
her/his linguistic
autobiography.
Linguistic autobiography is
informed by course readings or
other academic sources.
Linguistic
autobiography
includes 4 or more
terms/ideas from
course readings or
other academic
sources.
Linguistic
autobiography
includes 3 more
terms/ideas from
course readings or
other academic
sources.
Linguistic
autobiography
includes 2 more
terms/ideas from
course readings or
other academic
sources.
Linguistic
autobiography
includes 1 or no
terms/ideas from
course readings or
other academic
sources.
Auto-ethnographer has produced
aesthetic descriptions of personal
and interpersonal aspects
regarding multilingual
development of her/his life
experience.
Auto-ethnographer
has produced wellorganized and
relevant
descriptions of
personal and
interpersonal
aspects regarding
multilingual
development of
her/his life
experience.
Auto-ethnographer
has produced wellorganized or
relevant
descriptions of
personal and
interpersonal
aspects regarding
multilingual
development of
her/his life
experience.
Auto-ethnographer
has produced
minimal
descriptions of
personal and
interpersonal
aspects regarding
multilingual
development of
her/his life
experience.
Auto-ethnographer
has produced no
descriptions of
personal and
interpersonal
aspects regarding
multilingual
development of
her/his life
experience.
Auto-ethnographer uses
appropriate language conventions.
Appropriate
language
conventions (0 to 5
errors).
Appropriate
language
conventions (6 to
10 errors).
Appropriate
language
conventions (11 to
15 errors).
Appropriate
language
conventions (20
errors +).
Appendix
Rubric 4: Community Scan (15%)
Excellent
(4 points)
Content
In responding to
assignment, all
content is accurately
addressed, cited, and
documented.
Writing
Organization
All sections have a
clear beginning,
middle, and end.
Writing
Conventions
Very Good
(3 points)
Good/Fair
(2 points)
Unacceptable
(1 point)
In responding to
assignment, all
content is accurately
addressed, cited, and
documented -- 85% 94% .
Almost all sections
have a clear
beginning, middle and
end.
In responding to
assignment, all
content is accurately
addressed, cited, and
documented --70% 84%
Most sections have a
clear beginning,
middle and end.
In responding to
assignment, all
content is accurately
addressed, cited, and
documented— less
than 70%
Less than half of the
sections have a clear
beginning, middle and
end.
Appropriate language
conventions (0 to 5
errors).
Appropriate language
conventions (6 to 10
errors).
Appropriate language
conventions (11 to 15
errors).
Appropriate language
conventions (20 errors
+).
Sources
Careful and accurate
records are kept to
document the source
of 95- 100% of the
facts and graphics in
your work.
Careful and accurate
records are kept to
document the source
of 94-85% of the facts
and graphics in your
work.
Careful and accurate
records are kept to
document the source
of 84-75% of the facts
and graphics in your
work.
Sources are not
documented
accurately or are not
kept on many facts
and graphics in your
work.
Attractiveness &
Organization of
Community Scan
Presentation
The signature
assignment has
exceptionally
attractive formatting
and well-organized
information.
The signature
assignment has
attractive formatting
and well-organized
information.
The signature
assignment has an
adequate formatting
and organized
information.
The signature
assignment has is not
well formatting and
the materials are
confusing to the
reader.
Appendix
Teacher Performance Expectations (TPE)
A. MAKING SUBJECT MATTER COMPREHENSIBLE TO STUDENTS
TPE 1: Specific Pedagogical Skills for Subject Matter Instruction
TPE 1A: Subject-Specific Pedagogical Skills for Multiple Subject Teaching
Assignments in the following areas:
TPE 1B: Subject-Specific Pedagogical Skills for Single Subject Teaching
Assignments in the following areas:
B. ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING
TPE 2: Monitoring Student Learning During Instruction
TPE 3: Interpretation and Use of Assessments
C. ENGAGING AND SUPPORTING STUDENTS IN LEARNING
TPE 4: Making Content Accessible
TPE 5: Student Engagement
TPE 6: Developmentally Appropriate Teaching Practices
TPE 6A: Developmentally Appropriate Practices in Grades K-3
TPE 6B: Developmentally Appropriate Practices in Grades 4-8
TPE 6C: Developmentally Appropriate Practices in Grades 9-12
TPE 7: Teaching English Learners
D. PLANNING INSTRUCTION AND DESIGNING LEARNING EXPERIENCES FOR
STUDENTS
TPE 8: Learning about Students
TPE 9: Instructional Planning
E. CREATING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTS FOR STUDENT
LEARNING
TPE 10: Instructional Time
TPE 11: Social Environment
F. DEVELOPING AS A PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR
TPE 12: Professional, Legal, and Ethical Obligations
TPE 13: Professional Growth
G. DEVELOPING AS A DEMOCRATIC EDUCATOR
TPE 14: Social Justice
TPE 15: Biliteracy/Bicognition
TPE 16: Community and Culture
Knowledge, Dispositions, and Skills (KDS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ideological and pedagogical clarity
Biliteracy development and success across the content areas:
Collaborate with peers, students, parents, administrators, and community:
Create inclusive learning environments:
Global (linguistic and cultural) competence: