McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Managing Innovation and Fostering Corporate
Entrepreneurship
Chapter Twelve
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Innovation
using new knowledge to transform organizational processes or create commercially viable products and services
Latest technology, results of experiments, creative insights, competitive information
12-2
• There are “five disciplines” for creating what customers want
Identify important customer needs
Create solutions that fill those needs
Build innovation teams
Empower "innovation champions" who keep the effort on track
Align the entire enterprise around creating value for customers
Source: “Getting to ‘Aha!’,” Business Week . September 4, 2006.
12-3
• Product innovation
Efforts to create product designs
Applications of technology to develop new products for end users
More radical and common during early stages of an industry’s life cycle
Associated with differentiation strategies
12-4
• Process innovations
Improving efficiency of an organizational process
Manufacturing systems and operations
More likely to occur in later stages of an industry’s life cycle
Associated with cost leader strategies
12-5
• Radical innovation
Fundamental changes and breakthroughs
Evoke major departures from existing practices
Can be highly disruptive
Can transform or revolutionize a whole industry
12-6
• Incremental innovation
Enhance existing practices
Small improvements in products and processes
Evolutionary applications within existing paradigms
12-7
12-8
• Sustaining innovations
extend sales in an existing market, usually by enabling new products or services to be sold at higher margins.
• Disruptive innovations
overturn markets by providing an altogether new approach to meeting customer needs.
12-9
• Seeds versus Weeds
• Experience versus Initiative
• Internal versus External staffing
• Building capabilities versus Collaborating
• Incremental versus Preemptive launch
12-10
• Deciding the merits of innovative ideas
Seeds – likely to bear fruit
Weeds – should be cast aside
• Dilemma
Some innovation projects require considerable level of investment before merit can be determined
12-11
• Deciding who will lead an innovation project
Senior managers have experience and credibility and tend to be more risk averse
Midlevel employees may be the innovators themselves and have more enthusiasm
12-12
• People drawn from inside the firm
May have greater social capital
Know the organization’s culture and routines
May not be able to think outside the box
• People drawn from outside the firm
Are costly to recruit, hire, train
May have difficulty building relationships
12-13
Building Capabilities versus
Collaborating
• Firms can seek help
Other departments
Partner with other companies that bring resources and experience
• Partnerships
Create dependencies and inhibit internal skills development
Sharing benefits of innovation may create conflict
12-14
Incremental versus Preemptive Launch
• Incremental launch
Less risky
Requires few resources
Can undermine the project’s credibility if too tentative
• Large-scale launch
Requires more resources
Can effectively preempt a competitive response
12-15
• In defining the strategic envelope, a firm should answer several questions
How much will the innovation cost?
How likely is it to actually become commercially viable?
How much value will it add; that is, what will it be worth if it works?
What will be learned if it does not pan out?
12-16
• Incremental innovation
May be six months to two years
May use a milestone approach driven by goals and deadlines
• Radical innovation
Typically long term –
10 years or more
Often involves openended experimentation and time-consuming mistakes
12-17
• Corporate entrepreneurship
the creation of new value for a corporation, through investments that create either new sources of competitive advantage or renewal of the value proposition.
12-18
Factors affecting Entrepreneurial
Ventures
• The use of teams in strategic decision making
• Whether the company is product or service oriented
• Whether its innovation efforts are aimed at product or process improvements
• The extent to which it is high-tech or low-tech
12-19
Focused Approaches to Corporate
Entrepreneurship
• New venture group
a group of individuals, or a division within a corporation, that identifies, evaluates, and cultivates venture opportunities.
12-20
• Involvement includes
Innovation and experimentation
Coordinating with other corporate divisions
Identifying potential venture partners
Gathering resources
Launching the venture
12-21
Focused Approaches to Corporate
Entrepreneurship
• Business incubator
supports and nurtures fledgling entrepreneurial ventures until they can thrive on their own as stand-alone businesses.
12-22
• Incubators provide some or all of the following functions
Funding
Physical space
Business services
Monitoring
Networking
12-23
• Culture of entrepreneurship
Search for venture opportunities permeates every part of the organization
Strategic leaders and the culture generate a strong impetus to innovate, take risks and seek out new venture opportunities
12-24
• Product (or project) champions
Bring entrepreneurial ideas forward
Identify what kind of market exists for the product or service
Find resources to support the venture
Promote the venture concept to upper management
12-25
Measuring the Success of Corporate
Entrepreneurship Activities
Comparing strategic and financial CE goals
1.
Are the products or services offered by the venture accepted in the marketplace?
2.
Are the contributions of the venture to the corporation’s internal competencies and experience valuable?
3.
Is the venture able to sustain its basis of competitive advantage?
12-26
Measuring the Success of Corporate
Entrepreneurship Activities
• Exit champions
individual working within a corporation who is willing to question the viability of a venture project by demanding hard evidence of venture success and challenging the belief system that carries a venture forward.
12-27
• Real options analysis
for each investment step the investor has the option of (a) investing additional funds to grow or accelerate, (b) delaying, (c) shrinking the scale of, or (d) abandoning the activity.
12-28
Potential Pitfalls of Real Options
Analysis
• Agency Theory and the Back-Solver
Dilemma
• Managerial Conceit: Overconfidence and the Illusion of Control
• Managerial Conceit: Irrational Escalation of Commitment
12-29