KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE PROGRAM/CONCENTRATION PROPOSAL FORM 02/25/04 PROGRAM OR CONCENTRATION NAME: _Reading Endorsement _____________________ DEPARTMENT:_Secondary and Middle Grades Education____________________________ PROPOSED EFFECTIVE DATE: ___Fall 2009___________ Check One or More of the Following and Complete the Appropriate Sections _____New Program Proposal** __x___Change in Program/Concentration/Degree Requirements _____New Concentration Proposal Sections to be Completed All III – VII, XII I – VII, XII **A new course proposal is required for each new course that is part of the new program Submitted by: ______________________________________________________ Faculty Member Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ Department Curriculum Committee Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ Department Chair Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ College Curriculum Committee Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ College Dean Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ GPCC Chair Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ Dean, Graduate College Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ Vice President for Academic Affairs Date ___ Approved ___ Not Approved ______________________________________________________ President Date UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM PROPOSAL TITLE Reading Endorsement Kennesaw State University DATE Fall, 2008 DEPARTMENT Secondary and Middle Grades Education COLLEGE Bagwell College of Education Proposed Start Date: Fall, 2009 CIP:______ Title Description Date Page 2 of 7 I. Program Description (N/A) II. Unique Aspects of Program Institutional Importance of the Program KSU's Strategic Plan System and State of Georgia Goals Staffing, Facilities and Enrollment Objectives of the Program (N/A) III. Justification and Need for the Program Changes The Reading Endorsement was originally revised in the 2005-6006 academic year, based upon the recommendations of the 2004-2005 PSC/NCATE accreditation team. At that time, the accreditation report indicated that all three Reading Endorsement courses needed to show clearer alignment with the International Reading Association Reading (IRA) Standards; also, the Endorsement needed to develop a program and unit-level assessment plan for data collection. In 2006-2007, the Reading Endorsement was blended with the M.Ed. in Inclusive Education to provide a vehicle for candidates pursuing initial certification in General Individualized Curriculum (Special Education) to obtain an endorsement in a general education content area. While this action served to increase enrollment in the Reading Endorsement, complications arose in procedures for candidate admission and exit of the program. At about the same time, faculty identified students who were admitted into the Reading Endorsement who were seeking “recertification” only which means that they enter the university to take six hours of credit in any area. The combined impact of these two situations led the faculty to re-examine admission to the Reading Endorsement Program, as well as the need for a prerequisite course structure. (See Executive Summary.) Courses in the Reading Endorsement are taught by faculty across the Bagwell College of Education who hold appointments in the departments of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, Inclusive Education and Secondary and Middle Grades Education. While this interdepartmental nature of teaching enriches the program in many ways, it complicates the assessment of candidates’ mastery of the national, state and university standards. Therefore, the faculty re-examined the assessment system in order to assure reliability in assessment. IV. Procedures Used to Develop the Program Since 2005, the development of the Reading Endorsement program has been done by the Reading faculty in all departments in the Bagwell College of Education. Originally, based on the results of the PSC/NCATE visit, reading faculty aligned course descriptions with Title Description Date Page 3 of 7 the IRA Reading Standards, revised courses and adapted a version of the PTEU unit’s assessment system to the Reading Endorsement Program. In the fall of 2007, faculty in the Department of Secondary and Middle Grades Education created a PTEU-wide committee called, The Friends of Reading. This committee is comprised of faculty from the Department of English, the Department of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, the Department of Inclusive Education, the Department of Educational Leadership and the Center for Service, Outreach and Partnership. These individuals met twice in the 2007-2008 academic year and made recommendations for revisions of the program and courses offered in the Reading Endorsement. In the summer of 2008, faculty in the Department of Secondary and Middle Grades Education made the changes to the program and courses and created an Executive Summary for faculty in other departments to review. In the fall of 2008, the Executive Summary, along with revised syllabi were reviewed, and approved, by a team of faculty from three departments prior to submission to the TEC for College approval. In addition, faculty from SMGE and InEd met and agreed upon changes in procedures for MAT/TESOL. V. Curriculum: Degree Program Requirements Current catalog description, p. 120 (Attached to this form) Program Admission Requirements We propose one minor change in admissions policy and that is that those who wish to enroll in the Reading Endorsement provide documentation of successful completion of one Reading course with a grade of C or higher. This is considered to be a minor change in that most teachers with clear and renewable certificates have met this requirement as part of their undergraduate preparation. However, to assure that candidates have the background knowledge for the graduate courses offered in the Reading Endorsement, the faculty feel that documentation of at least one course is essential. Periodically, the PSC requires teachers to take six hours of instruction to renew their certificates. To meet this requirement, teachers can enroll in virtually anything, and many select reading courses. Because these individuals have not gone through Admissions in the BCOE Office of Graduate Programs (OGP), they drop into the courses, unannounced. Mr. David Baugher and Ms. Alicia Bellos have established a set of procedures in which students who apply for recertification purposes will be flagged by the OGP. A letter of acceptance will be sent to the student stating that their registration will be placed on hold until the student contacts the OGP for advisement. At that point, theses students will be subject to the same requirements as those who officially applied to the Reading Endorsement Program. Given that the Reading Endorsement is officially embedded within the M.Ed. in Inclusive Education and may be taken as an elective in other programs, there is some expectation that these individuals will automatically be accepted into the Reading Endorsement. Title Description Date Page 4 of 7 However, in order to systemize our process, we ask that their advisors assure that they need to be certified in Reading or that these courses are of benefit. To systematize our process, faculty teaching EDRD 7715, will assist students in completing the necessary application to the Reading Endorsement program. Course Offering Schedule and Plan-of-Study We are also requesting changes in the procedures for admissions such that students who are seeking admission for “recertification only” will not be admitted to the courses for the Reading Endorsement Program. A prerequisite course structure is requested, along with additional admission procedures by the Office of Graduate Programs in the Bagwell College of Education. Previously, candidates who were admitted to graduate studies in education were allowed to enroll at any point in the instructional sequence. This situation created difficulties for students who were attempting to take the more difficult courses first and made monitoring of student progress for assessment and reporting purposes difficult. Therefore, we are requesting that EDRD 7715 become the pre-requisite for EDRD 7717 and 7718. Even though the preferred sequence is EDRD 7715, EDRD 7718 and EDRD 7717(9), respectively, candidates may enroll in EDRD 7718 and EDRD 7719 simultaneously. Growth and Flexibility As noted above, the blending of the Reading Endorsement with the M.Ed. in Inclusive Education increased the enrollment of students in the Reading Endorsement. However, it also created the need for more structure in admissions, etc. The faculty are optimistic that the proposed changes will streamline the process and increase the flexibility of the program for candidates who are pursuing other degrees. Course Descriptions Course descriptions on pp. 144 (EDRD 7715, EDRD 7717, & EDRD 7718) will be replaced with the following: EDRD 7715 Theory and Pedagogy in the Study of Reading. 3-0-3. Prerequisite: Admission to graduate studies in education. An advanced study of the socio-psycholinguistic foundations of reading and writing. This course examines theories of language development and reading acquisition. Candidates will study scientifically-based research in the areas of phonemic awareness, word identification, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension and motivation. This course also explores historical perspectives of reading and reading research and a wide range of instructional practices and curriculum materials that meet the needs of diverse learners at all grade levels. This course serves as the prerequisite for the other two courses in the Reading Endorsement. Title Description Date Page 5 of 7 EDRD 7718 Content Area Reading. 3-0-3. Prerequisite: Admission to graduate studies in education and EDRD 7715 and EDRD 7717. Successful completion of EDRD 7715 An advanced study of the processes and problems of reading instruction in content area classrooms. This course explores components of the reading process related to content area reading instruction including technical reading, prior knowledge, reading strategies, supplemental texts, and methods of grouping. Candidates will plan instruction based on content area requirements that supports readers before, during, and after they read. Emphasis will be placed on supporting the unique reading needs of a diverse classroom of learners at all grade levels. A field component is required. EDRD 7715 is the prerequisite for this course. EDRD 7719 Reading Assessment and Instruction. 3-0-3. Prerequisite: Successful completion of EDRD 7715. An advanced study of reading assessment instruments used for understanding the individual and diverse needs of all grade-level readers including reading inventories, miscue analysis, and pausing indices. Students will use assessment data to plan, evaluate, and revise effective reading instruction that meets the diverse needs of students. Current trends and issues in testing and assessment in U.S. schools will be studied. A field component is required. The prerequisite for EDRD 7719 is EDRD 7715. Even though EDRD 7719 is the preferred last course in the sequence in the Reading Endorsement, candidates may simultaneously enroll in EDRD 7718. VI. Inventory Of Faculty Directly Involved While these courses are housed in the Department of Secondary and Middle Grades, courses will be taught by faculty across departments. That is, faculty from the Inclusive Education Department, the Early Childhood and Elementary Department and the Secondary and Middle Grades Department. At this point, no new faculty are needed, but as the program grows the need will grow. VII. Outstanding programs of this nature at other institutions Needs Assessment and Comparative Analysis. (N/A) This is a 3-course endorsement program and does not require this comparative analysis. Unique Features of KSU’s program: Collaborative infrastructure provided by the PTEU as well as the inter-departmental nature of the teaching faculty in the Reading Endorsement. VIII. Inventory of pertinent library resources (N/A) IX. X. Facilities (N/A) Administration (N/A) Title Description Date Page 6 of 7 XI. Assessment (N/A) XII. Accreditation Business Content Audit: Referencing the Business Content Worksheet, does this program or concentration, incorporating the information proposed herein, have “traditional business subject” content delivered by faculty or programs administered by the Coles College of Business? * _____ Yes If “yes,” complete a Business Content Worksheet and obtain necessary approvals as indicated. __X___ No _____ Exempt Graduate programs administered by the Coles College are exempt. * All graduate programs exceeding 50% business content are automatically required to meet AACSB International business accreditation standards. The purpose of the audit is to prevent the unintended, undesirable compulsory inclusion of programs subject to AACSB standards. XIII. Affirmative Action Impact (N/A) XIV. Degree Inscription (N/A) XV. Fiscal and Enrollment Impact, and Estimated Budget (N/A) 1. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2. COSTS A. Personnel -- reassigned or existing positions B. Personnel -- new positions C. One-Time Startup costs D. Operating Costs 3. REVENUE SOURCES Title Description Date Page 7 of 7