KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL OR REVISION, Cover Sheet (10/02/2002) Course Number/Program Name INED 7750 Department of Inclusive Education Degree Title (if applicable) Proposed Effective Date Summer 2007 Check one or more of the following and complete the appropriate sections: x x x New Course Proposal Course Title Change Course Number Change Course Credit Change Course Prerequisite Change Course Description Change Sections to be Completed II, III, IV, V, VII I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III Notes: If proposed changes to an existing course are substantial (credit hours, title, and description), a new course with a new number should be proposed. A new Course Proposal (Sections II, III, IV, V, VII) is required for each new course proposed as part of a new program. Current catalog information (Section I) is required for each existing course incorporated into the program. Minor changes to a course can use the simplified E-Z Course Change Form. Submitted by: Faculty Member Approved _____ Date Not Approved Department Curriculum Committee Date Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Not Approved Department Chair Date School Curriculum Committee Date School Dean Date GPCC Chair Date Dean, Graduate College Date Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Vice President for Academic Affairs Date Approved Not Approved President Date KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COURSE/CONCENTRATION/PROGRAM CHANGE I. Current Information (Fill in for changes) Page Number in Current Catalog p. 130 Course Prefix and Number EXC 7750 Course Title Language Learning Credit Hours 3 Prerequisites Description (or Current Degree Requirements) The development and interaction of oral, written, and social language are presented. Students will learn ways to access and enhance oral, written and social language development in students with mild disabilites. The effect of cultural context and different language backgrounds will be addressed. II. Proposed Information (Fill in for changes and new courses) Course Prefix and Number ___ _INED 7750____________________________ Course Title ____ Language, Power and Pedagogy _____________ __________________________ Credit Hours 3 Prerequisites Description (or Proposed Degree Requirements) This course is designed to engage candidates in critically examining a) the role of language and the implications of language policy on educational discourse, b) the nature and power of culture in the performance of students, c) the cultural context of children’s lives in school, including values, worldviews, and language, d) how children can be misidentified, misunderstood, mislabeled, and misplaced because of language differences, e) institutional and structural discrimination in educational settings, f) the education related challenges culturally and linguistically diverse families experience, and g) pedagogical benefits of bilingualism III. Justification This course was specifically designed for the M.Ed. in Inclusive Education: Concentration in TESOL and the MAT in TESOL. It is already part of the MAT program of study and is to be added to the M.Ed. program of study so that program requirements in both programs align. This course replaces EDUC 7735 Current Issues and Trends, which addresses current issues in Special Education rather than TESOL. IV. Additional Information (for New Courses only) Instructor: Karen Kuhel, Karen Harris, or Judy Holzman Text: Bigalow, B. (2001). Rethinking our classrooms: Vol. 2. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, Ltd. Hinchey, P., (2004) Becoming a critical educator: Defining a classroom identity, designing a critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang. Macedo, D., Dendrinos, B., & Gounari, P. (2003). The hegemony of English. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers Ramanathan, V. (2002). Politics of TESOL education: Writing, knowledge, critical pedagogy. Oxford, UK: Routledge Falmer Prerequisites: Objectives: The purpose of the course is to critically examine the roles of language, literacy, and diversity on the schooling practices of students who are English language learners, as well as other language minorities. The demographics of American society are rapidly changing. Currently, more than three million K-12 students come from homes where standard American English (SAE) is not the primary language of communication (Beykont, 2000). In addition to meeting the difficult tasks of schooling (e.g., learning to read, write, and perform complex math computations) that all students face, students who are English language learners also face the challenge of acquiring English as a second language and using it to learn academic content (Beykont, 2000). The course is intended to stimulate thought and action among future leaders in the field of ESOL to increase levels of cultural competence. Instructional Method Interactive discussions, presentations, journal, research paper Method of Evaluation 1) Critical Reviews of Readings 2) In-Class Journal Reflections 3) Research Paper 4) WebCT Discussion Threads V. Resources and Funding Required (New Courses only) Resource Amount Faculty Other Personnel Equipment Supplies Travel New Books New Journals Other (Specify) TOTAL Funding Required Beyond Normal Departmental Growth none none VII Attach Syllabus I. Course: INED 7750 Language, Power, and Pedagogy in Education Credit Hours: 3 Department of Inclusive Education Kennesaw State University Summer 2007 II. Instructors: Dr. Karen Kuhel Office: KH 3207 Phone: 678 797-2287 E-mail: kkuhel@kennesaw.edu Office: Hours: Monday & Wednesday 4:00-5:00 pm, Tuesday & Thursday, 3:00-4:00 pm & 7:45-8:45 pm & by appointment III. Class Sessions: Day and Time: Tuesday & Thursday, 4:00-7:45 pm Place: KH 1107 IV. Required Readings: Bigalow, B. (2001). Rethinking our classrooms: Vol. 2. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, Ltd. Hinchey, P., (2004) Becoming a critical educator: Defining a classroom identity, designing a critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang. Macedo, D., Dendrinos, B., & Gounari, P. (2003). The hegemony of English. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers Ramanathan, V. (2002). Politics of TESOL education: Writing, knowledge, critical pedagogy. Oxford, UK: Routledge Falmer Assigned readings from the Diversity Kit – http://www.lab.brown.edu/pubs/diversity_kit/index.shtml (click on download) V. Catalogue Description: This course is designed to engage candidates in critically examining a) the role of language and the implications of language policy on educational discourse, b) the nature and power of culture in the performance of students, c) the cultural context of children’s lives in school, including values, worldviews, and language, d) how children can be misidentified, misunderstood, mislabeled, and misplaced because of language differences, e) institutional and structural discrimination in educational settings, f) the education related challenges culturally and linguistically diverse families experience, and g) pedagogical benefits of bilingualism VI. Purpose/Rationale: The purpose of the course is to critically examine the roles of language, literacy, and diversity on the schooling practices of students who are English language learners, as well as other language minorities. The demographics of American society are rapidly changing. Currently, more than three million K-12 students come from homes where standard American English (SAE) is not the primary language of communication (Beykont, 2000). In addition to meeting the difficult tasks of schooling (e.g., learning to read, write, and perform complex math computations) that all students face, students who are English language learners also face the challenge of acquiring English as a second language and using it to learn academic content (Beykont, 2000). The course is intended to stimulate thought and action among future leaders in the field of ESOL to increase levels of cultural competence. Conceptual Framework Summary: Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching and Learning The Kennesaw State University teacher education faculty is committed to preparing teachers who demonstrate expertise in facilitating learning in all candidates. Toward that end, the KSU teacher education community strongly upholds the concept of collaborative preparation requiring guidance from professionals inside and outside the university. In tandem with this belief is the understanding that teacher expertise develops along a continuum which includes the stages of preservice, induction, in-service, and renewal; further, as candidates develop a strong research-based knowledge of content and pedagogy, they develop their professional expertise in recognizing, facilitating, assessing, and evaluating student learning. Knowledge Base: Teacher development is generally recognized as a continuum that includes four phases: preservice, induction, in-service, renewal (Odell, Huling, and Sweeny, 2000). Just as Sternberg (1996) believes that the concept of expertise is central to analyzing the teaching-learning process, the teacher education faculty at KSU believes that the concept of expertise is central to preparing effective classroom teachers and teacher leaders. Researchers describe how during the continuum phases teachers progress from being Novices learning to survive in classrooms toward becoming Experts who have achieved elegance in their teaching. We, like Sternberg (1998), believe that expertise is not an end-state but a process of continued development. Use of technology: Opportunities will be provided for candidates to demonstrate appropriate incorporation of technology in the teaching of English as a Second Language as well as to use technology for continued professional development. Demonstrations of proficiency in technology are part of the requirements for all courses in the College of Education. Diversity Statement: Kennesaw State University provides program accessibility and accommodations for persons defined as disabled under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. A number of services are available to help disabled students with their academic work. In order to make arrangements for special services, students must visit the Office of Disabled Student Support Services (ext. 6443) and arrange an individual assistance plan. In some cases, certification of disability is required. Learning about first and second language acquisition, the role of culture in language development, and techniques that are sensitive to learner needs will increase prospective ESOL teachers’ awareness of diversity in the classroom. VII. Goals and Objectives: The KSU teacher preparation faculty is strongly committed to the concept of teacher preparation as a developmental and collaborative process. Research for the past 25 years has described this process in increasingly complex terms. Universities and schools must work together to successfully prepare teachers who are capable of developing successful learners in today’s schools and who choose to continue their professional development. Course Standards, Outcomes, Performance Indicators & Objectives TESOL Standards 2.a.2 Understand and apply knowledge about the effects of racism, stereotyping, and discrimination to ESL teaching and learning Apply knowledge of: 1.a.1. Phonology 1.a.2. Morphology 1.a.3. Syntax 1.a.4. Semantics CPI Outcomes & Proficiencies NCATE Standards NCATE Standard I (KSD) NCATE Standard IV (Diversity) Course Objectives Dispel language myths CPI Outcome 1: SME 1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4 CPI Outcome 2: FL 2.1; 2.2; 2.4 NCATE Standard I (KSD) NCATE Standard IV (Diversity) CPI Outcome 1: SME 1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4 CPI Outcome 2: FL 2.1; 2.2; 2.4 NCATE Standard I (KSD) NCATE Standard IV (Diversity) CPI Outcome 1: SME 1.1; 1.2; 1.3;.l.4 CPI Outcome 2: FL 2.1; 2.2; 2.4 CPI Outcome 3: CP 3.1;.3.2 NCATE Standard I (KSD) NCATE Standard IV (Diversity) Understand and apply how linguistics can influence issues related to identification and placement of ELLs and students with disabilities Describe the impact of the nature and power of culture CPI Outcome 1: SME 1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4 CPI Outcome 2: FL 2.1; 2.2; 2.4 NCATE Standard I (KSD) NCATE Standard IV (Diversity) * TESOL Standards addressed in this course are: 1.a. Describing Language 1.b. Language Acquisition and Development 2.a. Nature and Role of Culture 2.b. Cultural Groups and Identity Examine the cultural context of children’s lives in school, including values, worldviews, and language 1.b.7. Recognize the ESOL student’s home language and language varieties and build on skills as foundation for learning English. 2.a.3. Understand and apply knowledge about home/school communication to enhance ESOL teaching and build partnerships with ESOL families. 2.a.4 Understand and apply concepts about the interrelationships between language and culture. 2.b.2. Understand and apply knowledge about how cultural identify affects learning VIII. Understand and examine the challenges that CLD families experience Evidence of Mastery Discussion Critical Review Discussion Group activity Discussion Journal reflection WebCT discussion thread Case Study reflection Discussion Critical review Journal reflections Research paper Discussion Research paper Journal reflection Course Requirements: While completing this course, you are required to be involved in a variety of leadership and school-based activities directed at the improvement of teaching and learning. Appropriate activities may include, but are not limited to, attending and presenting at professional conferences, actively serving on or chairing school-based committees, attending PTA/school board meetings, leading or presenting professional development activities at the school or district level, and participating in education-related community events. As you continue your educational experiences, you are encouraged to explore every opportunity to learn by doing. 1) 2) 3) 4) Assignment Critical Reviews of Readings (3) In-Class Journal Reflections (6) Research Paper WebCT Discussion Threads (3) Points Assessed 75 60 50 15 ________ 200 Critical Issue Review (3): Candidates will write 2-3 page critical issue reviews based on issues in course readings and class discussions. As a class we will keep a list of potential issues that can be reviewed. Two issues will be addressed by the class as a whole and one issue will be at the discretion of the each candidate. In-Class/At Home Journal Reflections (12): Candidates will be given time (10 minutes) at the end of each class to reflect on daily discussions. Candidates will use these reflections to fuel their WebCT weekly discussions. It is expected that the inclass journals will be expanded upon at home. The journal will be collected at the end of the semester. WebCT Discussion Threads Each week a discussion topic will be posted on WebCT. Candidates will post comments and respond to a minimum of two colleagues. Research Paper Over the course of the semester, candidates will collect articles from newspapers, the internet, magazines, and other media regarding examples of issues discussed over the course of the semester. Candidates will also find two articles in education journals that support or dispute the stances presented in the popular media pieces. Candidates will write a 5-page paper discussing the pros and cons of an issue. IX. Evaluation and Grading: A = 100% to 90% B = 89% to 80% C = 79% to 70% D = 69 %to 60% F = 59% and below X. Academic Honesty Statement KSU expects that course participants will pursue their academic programs in an ethical, professional manner. Any coursework or course requirements should represent their own efforts, achieved without giving or receiving any unauthorized assistance. Any participant who is found to have violated these expectations will be subject to disciplinary action. XI. Class Attendance/Participation Policy To facilitate your learning as individuals, as well as the development of a collegial learning community, attendance is expected and will be recorded. Three or more absences will result in a reduction of your course grade by one letter grade. Six or more absences will result in a reduction of your course grade by two letter grades. This course is a serious academic endeavor. You will be required to spend a significant amount of time both in and outside of the classroom doing readings, activities, research, and online discussions. It will be participatory in nature. Occasionally, lectures will be given, but with a focus on group discussion. It is expected that you will be present and highly involved in the class discussion and activities. Dispositions for learning Open-mindedness; whole-heartedness; intellectual curiosity; respect for the voices, beliefs, and feelings of others; and responsibility for your words and actions are critical to the success of our class sessions. Content that is focused on issues related to diversity is potentially emotionally charged and/or controversial. Some students may find themselves offended or disturbed by particular topics, theories, and perspectives addressed and discussed in this class. Please be prepared to think past your prior experiences and biases. Preparation for engagement Please come to class prepared for the day’s activities. A candidate demonstrates preparedness by reading the assigned readings (text and articles) prior to coming to class, as well as taking notes and generating questions based on what was read. XII. Course Outline Date June 7 June 14 June 21 Topics/Activities/In-Class Assignments Assignments Due Course Introduction/ Defining Self and Other/The Power of In-class Journal Language/Power and Politics in Education “Othering” Reflection #1 Group Activities Socialization of Immigrants In-class Journal Language debates Reflection #2 Separating fact from fiction WebCT Discussion Examining language myths Thread #1 Critical Review Due Language Acquisition, Second Language Acquisition, Social and Academic Language Videos: California Proposition 227 and Foreign Language Lesson Language policy and Educational Discourse Hegemony of English (L2 & Dialectal Variations) Language in a global environment Multiple perspectives Critical Theory/Pedagogy in Research & Education Group Activities In-class Journal Reflection #3 In-class Journal Reflection #4 WebCT Discussion Thread #2 Critical Review Due July 5 Language, Culture, and Schooling (Diversity Kit pp. 199-220) The Interface between Bilingual and Special Education July 12 Teacher preparation Issues relative to language variability Dispositions Group Activities Critique paper due In-class Journal Reflection #5 In-class Journal Reflection #6 WebCT Discussion Thread #3 Critical Review Due July 19 Research on Instructional Practices SIOP, CALLA, and HOTS June 28 XIII. DRAFT SAMPLE OUTLINE Bibliography Ariza, E. N., Morales-Jones, C. A., Yahya, N., & Zainuddin, H. (2002). Why Tesol? Theories and issues in teaching English as a second language with a k-12 focus. (2nd Ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing. Asher, J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher's guidebook. Los Gatos: Sky Oaks Publications. Baca, L. M. & Cervantes, H. T. (2004). The bilingual special education interface (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Bartolome, L. I. (2002). Creating an equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, border crossers, and cultural brokers. In Z. F. Beykont (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language differences (pp. 167-192). Cambridge: Harvard Education Publishing Group. Bauer, L. & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (1998). Language myths. London, England: Penguin Books. Baugh, J. (2000). Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. New York: Oxford University Press. Becker, H. (2001). Teaching ESL k-12: Views from the classroom. Boston, Mass: Heinle and Heinle. Bialystyok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York: Basic Books. Brown, H. D. & Gonzo, S. (Eds.). (1995). Readings on second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1, 1-47. Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.). (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. Ford, C. (1997). 101 bright ideas: ESL activities for all ages. Addison-Wesley. Fu, D. (1995). My problem is my English: Asian students and the American dream. Portsmith N.H.: Boyton/Cook Publishers. Gardner, R. & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House. Hadley, P.A., Simmerman, A., Long, M., & Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating language development for inner-city children: Experimental evaluation of a collaborative classroom-based intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 280-295. Herrell, A. (2000). Fifty strategies for teaching English language learners. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Igoa, C. (1995). The inner world of the immigrant child. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Irvine, J. J. (2003). Educating teachers for diversity: Seeing with a cultural eye. New York: Teachers College Press. Johnson, F. (2000). Speaking culturally: language diversity in the United States. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Klippel, F. (2000). Keep talking: Communicative fluency activities for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krashen, S. & Terrel, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lightbrown, P. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied linguistics 21 431-462. Lightbrown, P. and N. Spada. (1999). How languages are learned. 2nd ed.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Macedo, D. P. (1999). The illiteracy of English-only literacy. Educational Leadership, 57(4), 62-67. Parker, F. & Riley, K. (2005). Linguistics for non-linguists: A primer with exercises 4th Ed.). Boston, Mass: Pearson Education. Rodriguez, R. (1982). Aria. In Hunger of Memory: the Education of Richard Rodriguez (pp. 9-40). New York: Bantam Books. Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Schlesinger, J., A. M. (1998). The decomposition of America. In The Disuniting of America Reflections on a Multicultural Society (pp. 105-124). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Sion, C. (1991). More Recipes for tired teachers. Canterbury: Addison-Wesley. Sion, C. (1983). Recipes for tired teachers. Canterbury: Addison-Wesley. Spenser, D. (1995). Transitional bilingual education and the socialization of immigrants. In P. Leistyna, W. A. & S. A. Sherblom (Eds.), Breaking Free: The Transformative Power of Critical Pedagogy. Boston: Harvard Educational Review. Ur, P. & Wright, A. (2001). Five-minute activities: A resource book of short activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Valdes, G. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.