KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY
GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL OR REVISION,
Cover Sheet (10/02/2002)
Course Number/Program Name ECE 8160 Cognitive Processes and Educational Practice
Department Elementary and Early Childhood Education
Degree Title (if applicable) Ed. D.
Proposed Effective Date Fall 2006
Check one or more of the following and complete the appropriate sections:
x
New Course Proposal
Course Title Change
Course Number Change
Course Credit Change
Course Prerequisite Change
Course Description Change
Sections to be Completed
II, III, IV, V, VII
I, II, III
I, II, III
I, II, III
I, II, III
I, II, III
Notes:
If proposed changes to an existing course are substantial (credit hours, title, and description), a new course with a
new number should be proposed.
A new Course Proposal (Sections II, III, IV, V, VII) is required for each new course proposed as part of a new
program. Current catalog information (Section I) is required for each existing course incorporated into the
program.
Minor changes to a course can use the simplified E-Z Course Change Form.
Submitted by:
Faculty Member
Approved
_____
Date
Not Approved
Department Curriculum Committee Date
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Not Approved
Department Chair
Date
School Curriculum Committee
Date
School Dean
Date
GPCC Chair
Date
Dean, Graduate Studies
Date
Not Approved
Not Approved
Not Approved
Not Approved
Not Approved
Vice President for Academic Affairs Date
Approved
Not Approved
President
Date
Page 1 of 15
KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY
GRADUATE COURSE/CONCENTRATION/PROGRAM CHANGE
I.
Current Information (Fill in for changes)
Page Number in Current Catalog
Course Prefix and Number
Course Title
Credit Hours
Prerequisites
Description (or Current Degree Requirements)
II.
Proposed Information (Fill in for changes and new courses)
Course Prefix and Number ECE 8160 _____________________
Course Title __Cognitive Processes and Educational Practice
Credit Hours 3
Prerequisites Acceptance to the Ed D. program
Description (or Proposed Degree Requirements)
This course will present the basic challenges of applying scientific cognitive research to learning in
educational settings. This course is designed for students who want to explore children’s cognitive
development and the links between cognition and learning. As key players in curriculum decision making
and implementation, teacher must make informed decisions about learning based on some of the latest and
most accepted research about neurological and cognition that underlie learning.
III.
Justification
This course will serve as a central “touch stone” for understanding the link between teaching and learning as
well as curriculum development and implementation. The greater the understanding of the cognitive
process that teachers possess, the more accurately they will be able to modify instruction, develop
meaningful curriculum, and understand the inner world of the learning process
Page 2 of 15
IV.
Additional Information (for New Courses only)
Instructor: To be assigned
Text:
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York: Penguin Books.
Gazzaniga, M., Ivery, R. & Mangun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology
of the mind. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Mestre, J. (Ed.) (2005). Transfer of Learning: Research and perspectives (current
Perspective on Cognition, Learning and Instruction. Greenwich, Connecticut:
International Age Publishers.
Prerequisites:
Admission to the Ed D. program
Objectives:
Course Objectives
Develop an understanding of cognitive
development
develop an understanding of Howard
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence
Theories and its application to learning
and development
develop an understanding of the early
stages of numerical knowledge (
Doctoral
KSDs
1A
1A, 4A
Distributed School
Leadership Roles
Curriculum, Instruction &
Assessment Leader
PSC/NCATE
Standards
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Learning & Development
Leader
Curriculum, Instruction &
Assessment Leader
1.1, 1.3, 1.4,
1.7, 1.6
Learning & Development
Leader
Change Leader, Operations
Leader,
Performance Leader
1A
Learning & Development
Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance Improvement
Leader
describe the neurological component
involved in numerical processing
1A,
Learning & Development
Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance Improvement
Leader
Page 3 of 15
1. identify the central role of Chomsky’s
ides and the development of
language skills in early childhood
1A
2. explore connection between language 1A
and literacy
Learning & Development
Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance Improvement
Leader
Learning & Development
Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance Improvement
Leader
Instructional Method




Technology: Students in Module I are expected to examine uses of instructional
technology, including calculators, projected visual technology, audio and video
technology, computer technology, and Internet resources in the teaching and
learning of science. They are expected to incorporate technology into their
lessons when appropriate – development of lesson, implementation of lesson,
assessment of lesson, analysis of teaching, etc.
Field Experience
Individual and Group Assignments
Lecture
Method of Evaluation
Individual Assignment
 Write a paper that will compare and contrast the learning strategies in mathematics
used by students at risk with those who are functioning at acceptable levels—100
points
 Write a paper identifying factors external to the student that drive (or dissuade)
motivation in education context and postulate activities to counteract negative
external factors --100 points
 After observing the expression of emotions and analyzing it using emotion theories
and concepts write a paper –100 points
Group Assignment
 Contribute quality content to large/small group discussions S/U
 Three points will be subtracted from the final average for each “U” received.
A:
B:
C:
F:
V.
92% - 100%
84% - 91%
75% - 83%
75% or lower
Resources and Funding Required (New Courses only)
Page 4 of 15
*Course funding is addressed in a comprehensive manner in the comprehensive proposal for the umbrella
Ed.D degree for the Bagwell College of Education.
Resource
Amount
Faculty
Other Personnel
Equipment
Supplies
Travel
New Books
New Journals
Other (Specify)
TOTAL
Funding Required Beyond
Normal Departmental Growth
Page 5 of 15
VI. COURSE MASTER FORM
This form will be completed by the requesting department and will be sent to the Office of the
Registrar once the course has been approved by the Office of the President.
The form is required for all new courses.
DISCIPLINE
COURSE NUMBER
COURSE TITLE FOR LABEL
(Note: Limit 16 spaces)
CLASS-LAB-CREDIT HOURS
Approval, Effective Term
Grades Allowed (Regular or S/U)
If course used to satisfy CPC, what areas?
Learning Support Programs courses which are
required as prerequisites
EECE
ECE 8160
Cog. Processes
3
Fall 2006
Regular
APPROVED:
________________________________________________
Vice President for Academic Affairs or Designee __
VII Attach Syllabus
Page 6 of 15
Elementary and Early Childhood Education
Education Specialists Program
ECE 8160 Cognitive Processes and Educational Practice
Kennesaw State University
Bagwell College of Education
Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education
Semester Fall 2006
I.
ECE 8160 Cognitive Processes and Educational Practice
II.
INSTRUCTOR: xxxxx
Kennesaw Hall Room xxx
Office Phone- xxxxx
e-mail xxxxx
III.
CLASS MEETINGS: TBA
IV:
TEXTS
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York: Penguin Books.
Gazzaniga, M., Ivery, R. & Mangun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New
York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Mestre, J. (Ed.) (2005). Transfer of Learning: Research and perspectives (current Perspective on
Cognition, Learning and Instruction. Greenwich, Connecticut: International Age Publishers.
Also you will need to bring an APA Style Manual to class everyday. Those students who own laptop
computers should bring those to class, too,
V. CATALOG COURSE DESCRIPTIONS:
ECE 8160 Cognitive Processes and Educational Practice
This course will present the basic challenges of applying scientific cognitive research to learning in
educational settings. This course is designed for students who want to explore children’s cognitive
development and the links between cognition and learning. As key players in curriculum decision making
and implementation, teacher must make informed decisions about learning based on some of the latest
and most accepted research about neurological and cognition that underlie learning.
VI.
PURPOSE/RATIONALE:
This course will serve as a central “touch stone” for understanding the link between teaching and learning
as well as curriculum development and implementation. The greater the understanding of the cognitive
process that teachers possess, the more accurately they will be able to modify instruction, develop
meaningful curriculum, and understand the inner world of the learning process.
Page 7 of 15
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK SUMMARY
Collaborative development of expertise in teaching and learning
The Professional Teacher Education Unit (PTEU) at Kennesaw State University is committed to developing expertise
among candidates in initial and advanced programs as teachers and leaders who possess the capability, intent and
expertise to facilitate high levels of learning in all of their students through effective, research-based practices in
classroom instruction, and who enhance the structures that support all learning. To that end, the PTEU fosters the
development of candidates as they progress through stages of growth from novice to proficient to expert and leader.
Within the PTEU conceptual framework, expertise is viewed as a process of continued development, not an endstate. To be effective, teachers and educational leaders must embrace the notion that teaching and learning are
entwined and that only through the implementation of validated practices can all students construct meaning and
reach high levels of learning. In that way, candidates at the doctoral level develop into leaders for learning and
facilitators of the teaching and learning process. Finally, the PTEU recognizes, values and demonstrates
collaborative practices across the college and university and extends collaboration to the community-at-large.
Through this collaboration with professionals in the university, the public and private schools, parents and other
professional partners, the PTEU meets the ultimate goal of assisting Georgia schools in bringing all students to high
levels of learning.
Knowledge Base
Teacher development is generally recognized as a continuum that includes four phases: preservice,
induction, in-service, renewal (Odell, Huling, and Sweeny, 2000). Just as Sternberg (1996) believes that the
concept of expertise is central to analyzing the teaching-learning process, the teacher education faculty at
KSU believe that the concept of expertise is central to preparing effective classroom teachers and teacher
leaders. Researchers describe how during the continuum phases teachers progress from being Novices
learning to survive in classrooms toward becoming Experts who have achieved elegance in their teaching.
We, like Sternberg (1998), believe that expertise is not an end-state but a process of continued development.
Use of Technology : Technology Standards for Educators are required by the Professional Standards Commission.
Telecommunication and information technologies will be integrated throughout the master teacher preparation
program, and all candidates must be able to use technology to improve student learning and meet Georgia
Technology Standards for Educators. During the courses, candidates will be provided with opportunities to explore
and use instructional media. They will master use of productivity tools, such as multimedia facilities, local-net and
Internet, and feel confident to design multimedia instructional materials, and create WWW resources
VII. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: The Professional Teacher Education Unit prepares learning facilitators who
understand their disciplines and principles of pedagogy, who reflect on their practice, and who apply these
understandings to making instructional decisions that foster the success of all learners. As a result of the satisfactory
fulfillment of the requirements of these courses, the candidate will demonstrate the following outcomes:
ECE 8xxx Cognitive Process and Educational Practice
Course Objectives
Develop an understanding of cognitive
development
Doctoral
KSDs
1A
Distributed School
Leadership Roles
Curriculum,
Instruction &
PSC/NCATE
Standards
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Page 8 of 15
Assessment Leader
develop an understanding of Howard
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence Theories and
its application to learning and development
1A, 4A
Learning &
Development Leader
Curriculum,
Instruction &
Assessment Leader
1.1, 1.3, 1.4,
1.7, 1.6
Learning &
Development Leader
Change Leader,
Operations Leader,
Performance Leader
develop an understanding of the early stages of 1A
numerical knowledge (KSDs 1a)
Learning &
Development Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance
Improvement Leader
describe the neurological component involved
in numerical processing (KSDs 1a)
1A,
Learning &
Development Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance
Improvement Leader
identify the central role of Chomsky’s ides and
the development of language skills in early
childhood (KSDs 1a)
1A
explore connection between language and
literacy (KSDs 1a)
1A
Learning &
Development Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance
Improvement Leader
Learning &
Development Leader
1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 1.5
Performance
Improvement Leader
Georgia's Leadership Institute for School Improvement & Georgia Committee on Educational Leadership
Preparation’s Distributed School Leadership Roles
VIII. COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND ASSIGNMENTS:
Individual Assignment
Write a paper that will compare and contrast the learning strategies in mathematics used by students at risk
with those who are functioning at acceptable levels—100 points
Write a paper identifying factors external to the student that drive (or dissuade) motivation in education
context and postulate activities to counteract negative external factors --100 points
Page 9 of 15
After observing the expression of emotions and analyzing it using emotion theories and concepts write a
paper –100 points
Group Assignment
Contribute quality content to large/small group discussions S/U
Three points will be subtracted from the final average for each “U” received.
IX.
EVALUATION AND GRADING:
A:
B:
C:
F:
92% - 100%
84% - 91%
75% - 83%
75% or lower
Note: All written work should reflect careful organization of material and the high standards of investigation
associated with college-level studies. Papers should be typewritten, on 8 1/2 x 11 in. paper. All work submitted
should follow APA format. Manuscripts must be proof-read to ensure accuracy in spelling, punctuation, and
grammar. Written work should be attractive and neat -- ESPECIALLY WITH MATERIALS INTENDED FOR
STUDENT USE.
IX. Policies
Diversity: A variety of materials and instructional strategies will be employed to meet the needs of the different
learning styles of diverse learners in class. Candidates will gain knowledge as well as an understanding of
differentiated strategies and curricula for providing effective instruction and assessment within multicultural
classrooms. One element of course work is raising candidate awareness of critical multicultural issues. A second
element is to cause candidates to explore how multiple attributes of multicultural populations influence decisions in
employing specific methods and materials for every student. Among these attributes are age, disability, ethnicity,
family structure, gender, geographic region, giftedness, language, race, religion, sexual orientation, and
socioeconomic status. An emphasis on cognitive style differences provides a background for the consideration of
cultural context.
Kennesaw State University provides program accessibility and accommodations for persons defined as disabled
under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. A number of
services are available to support students with disabilities within their academic program. In order to make
arrangements for special services, students must visit the Office of Disabled Student Support Services (ext. 6443)
and develop an individual assistance plan. In some cases, certification of disability is required.
Please be aware there are other support/mentor groups on the campus of Kennesaw State University that address
each of the multicultural variables outlined above.
Professionalism- Academic Honesty: KSU expects that graduate students will pursue their academic programs in an
ethical, professional manner. Faculty of the EdS and EdD programs abide by the policies and guidelines established
by the university in their expectations for candidates’ work. Candidates are responsible for knowing and adhering to
the guidelines of academic honesty as stated in the graduate catalog. Any candidate who is found to have violated
these guidelines will be subject to disciplinary action consistent with university policy. For example, plagiarism or
other violations of the University’s Academic Honesty policies could result in a grade of “F” in the course and a formal
hearing before the Judiciary Committee.
Professionalism- Participation and Attendance: Part of your success in this class is related to your ability to provide
peer reviews and feedback to your editing groups regarding their research and their writing.
Page 10 of 15
Furthermore, responding effectively and appropriately to feedback from your peers and the professor is
another measure of one’s professionalism. In addition, since each class meeting represents a week of
instruction/learning, failure to attend class will likely impact your performance on assignments and final
exams. Please be prepared with all readings completed prior to class. We depend on one another to
ask pertinent and insightful questions.
XI.
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Anderson, J. R. (1991). Cognitive psychology and its implications, third edition. New York: Freeman.
Baron, J. B, & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.) (1987). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: Freeman.
Bartlett, F.C. (1932, Republished 1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Blair, Clancy. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization
of children's functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111-127.
Bransford, J. D. & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1983). In search of mind. New York: Harper.
Bruner, J. (1971). The course of cognitive growth. In Sears, P.S. (Ed.), Intellectual development (pp.255-282).
NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bruer, J. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26 (8), 4-16.
Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, R. L., Loftus, E. F., & Healy, A. F. (1986). Cognitive processes, second edition.
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Chipman, S. F., Segal, J. W., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1985). Thinking and learning skills. Volume 2: Research and
open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cole, H. P., Moss, J., Gohs, F. X., Lacefield, W. E., Barfield, B. J., & Blythe, D. K. (1984). Measuring learning in
continuing education for scientists and engineers. Phoenix: Oryx.
Carey, S. (1990). Cognitive development. In Osherson, D.N. & Smith, E.E. (Eds.). Thinking: An invitation to
cognitive science, Vol. 3, 147-172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Perennial Press. Chapter 4, especially
pp. 71-79.
Covington, M.V. (2000) Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review
of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Page 11 of 15
Dillon, R. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Cognition and instruction. New York: Academic Press.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. Chapters 4-6 (pp. 91-172).
Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense. Chapters 7 and 8 (pp. 175-230).
Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development
of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination
perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 325-346.
Damasio, A.R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. Chapter 2: Emotion and feeling (pp. 35-81).
Dalgleish, T. (2004). Timeline: The emotional brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(7), 582-589.
Egan, K. (2003). Getting it wrong from the beginning. Introduction, Ch.1, 2, 3, and 5.
Egan, K. (2003). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressivist inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John
Dewey, and Jean Piaget. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fink, R. (2005, in press). What successful adults with dyslexia teach educators about children. In K.W. Fischer,
J.H. Bernstein, & M.H. Immordino-Yang (Eds.), Mind, brain, and education in reading disorders. Cambridge,
U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, K.W., Bernstein, J.H., & Immordino-Yang, M.H. (in press). Mind, brain, and education in learning
disorders (pp 2-16). Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, K.W. & Bidell, T.R. (2005, in press). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In R.M.
Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley. Pp.1-62.
Fischer, K. W., Yan, Z., & Stewart, J. (2002). Adult cognitive development: Dynamics in the developmental web.
In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 491-516). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Part III, pp.47-101.
Freud, S. (1975). The dissection of the psychical personality. In S. Freud, New introductory lectures on
psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349-358)
Fischer, K.W. & Bidell, T.R. (2005, in press). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In R.M.
Lerner (Ed.) Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley. Section on
‘Emotions and the dynamic organization of activity and development’. Pp. 102-122.
Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the
animate-inanimate distinction. Cognitive Science, 14, 79-106.
Griffin, S., Case, R., Siegler, R. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for the first
formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure.
Gopnik et al (1999). The scientist in the crib. Chapter 4: What children learn about language (pp. 92-128).
Page 12 of 15
Gough, P. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by
eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. Chapter 13:
Emotion (pp. 537-576).
Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little Brown.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution, New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.), (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gould, S.J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York: Penguin Books.
Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York:
W.W. Norton & Co.
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib. New York: William Morrow & Co.
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib. Chapter 1 (pp 1-22). NY: William Morrow &
Co.
Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Magnun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. C.3 (pp.62-95):
“Gross and Functional Anatomy of Cognitionâ€. NY: W.W. Norton & Co
Harris, P. L. (1989). Children and emotion. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Chapter 3.
McCartney, K. & Dearing, E. (2002). Attachment. In N. J. Salkind & L. H. Margolis (Eds.), Child
development (pp. 32-37). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.
Halpern, D. F. (1984). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hofstadter, D. R., & Dennett, D. C. (1982). The mind's I: Fantasies and reflections on self and soul. NY: Bantam.
Inhelder, B., & Chipman, Harold, H. (1976). Piaget and His School, New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Volumes I and II. (1950 reprinted unabridged edition) New
York: Dover.
Juel, C. (1991). Beginning reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of
reading research, 2, (pp. 759-788). New York: Longman.
Kamin, L.J. (1974). The science and politics of IQ. Potomac, MD: Halsted Press.
Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chapters 1-3 (pp.
3-13).
Page 13 of 15
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, & society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1981). The promise of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
McGilly (Ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp 25-49). MIT Press:
Cambridge, MA.
Morais, J. & Kolinsky, R. (2000). Biology and culture in the literate mind. Brain and Cognition, 42(1), 47-49.
National Research Council (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. J. Bransford,
A.Brown, R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1/
Neisser, U. (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality, San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, U. & Winograd, E. (Eds.) (1995). Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to
the study of memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D.R. (1995). Writing and the mind. In J.V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez(Eds.), Sociocultural studies
of the mind (pp. 95-123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Plomin, R., Defries, J., McClearn, G., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral Genetics (3rd ed.). NY: Worth. Ch.5:
Nature, nurture, and behavior (pp.57-87).
Piaget, J. & Szeminska, A. (1941). The Child’s conception of number. Selected pages reprinted in Gruber, H.E.
& Voneche, J.J. (1977). The essential Piaget (pp 298-311). New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.
Paulesu, E., Démonet, J., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S., Cossu,G., Habib, M.,
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, Issue 5511,
2165-2167.
Reissman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human. New York: HarperCollins.
Chapter 1: The paragon of animals (pp7-37).
Rose, D., Meyer A., Strangman, N. & Rappolt, G. (2002) Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal
Design for Learning. (Chapters 4 & 8: What is Universal Design for Learning; Making Universal Design for
Learning a Reality). ASCD.
http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/
Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2002). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in education
reform.
http://www.cast.org/system/galleries/download/byCAST/margins.pdf
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.) (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.
Siegler, R.S. (2003). Implications of cognitive science research for mathematics education. in Kilpatrick, J., Martin,
W.B., & Schifter, D.E. (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp
219-233). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Page 14 of 15
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, New Series,
(JSTOR) Vol. 182, No. 4112, 553-559.
Shaywitz S. & Shaywitz B. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57 (11), 1301-1309.
Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American
Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.
Temple, E., Deutsch, G., Poldrack, R., Miller, S., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M., & Gabrieli, J. (2003). Neural deficits in
children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(5), 2860-2865.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chapter 1: A puzzle and a hypothesis and Chapter 2: Biological and cultural inheritance (pp. 1-55).
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press
Vygotsky (1978). Mind and society. Chapters 3 and 4 (pp. 38-57).
Weisberg, R. (1986). Creativity, genius, and other myths. New York: Freeman.
Weiss, S. M., & Kulikowski, C. A. (1984). A practical guide to designing expert systems. Totowa, NJ: Rowman &
Alanheld.
Wertsch, J.V., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.) (1995). Sociocultural studies of the mind. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Winston, P. H., & Prendergast, K. A. (Eds.). (1986). The AI business: Commercial uses of artificial intelligence.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris
(Ed.), The concept of development (pp.125-148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Wynn, K. (1998). Numerical competence in infants. In C. Donlan (Ed.) The development of mathematical skills
(pp. 3-25). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Page 15 of 15