Implementation of the Joint Operations Plan Regionalization of the Water Resource

advertisement
Implementation of the
Joint Operations Plan
Regionalization of the Water Resource
Carol Bryck
Capstone Project
Executive Masters of Public Administration
Portland State University
Advisor: Dr. Craig Shinn
Joint Operations Plan (JOP)
 The JOP is an agreement between:
 Clackamas River Water (CRW)
 North Clackamas County Water Commission (NCCWC)
 South Fork Water Board (SFWB)
 Purpose:
 Effective and efficient use of the water resource for the benefit
of all customers
 Timeline:
 Signed July 2001
 Not implemented
2
Provisions of the JOP
 Optimizing the use of all three plants and major pump
stations
 Optimizing power consumption
 Facilitating expanded use of gravity flows and reservoir
use
 Increasing coordination among the plants
3
Clackamas River Basin
 974 square miles of
watershed:
 Water flow
 Timothy Lake – up river
storage
 Dams/water
flow/hydroelectric
 Demands:
 Water demands within the
JOP participants
 Residential/domestic
 Industrial
 Agricultural
4
 See if Mike can make an electronic map showing four
WTPs and city and district boundaries.
5
Why is this important?
 Public Benefit
 Availability of Water - a limited resource
 Cost effective provision of necessary resource
 Potential increased equitable rate structures
 Water Provider Benefits
 Cost savings on operations
 Delay of high capital cost of infrastructure
 Efficient and effective operation
7
Water Flows - with Trend Line
5,000
4,500
4,000
Cubic Feet per Second
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Average Minimum flows per month
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Minimum flows for fish
8
Water Demands
25.0
Million Gallons per Day
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Estmated demand - CRW
Feb
Mar
Apr
Estmated demand - NCCWC
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Estmated demand - SFWB
9
Capital Cost of Expansion
 Capital cost for plant capacity expansion estimated
from $2 to $5 per gallon
 5 million gallons per day would cost $10 million to $25
million
 Estimated annual debt payment for $25 million bond
 20 year debt - $1.8 million per year
 Evenly distributed to affected wholesale and retail
customers $2 to $3/month for the next 20 years
10
Current Rates with Additional
Cost of Capital
$40
Cost pr month - average consumption 8 ccf
$35
$30
$25
Cost of Capital
$20
Consumption
Base Rate
$15
$10
$5
$CRW
Gladstone
SWA
NCCWC
OLWD
West Linn
Oregon City
SFWB
11
Effect on Public
 Rate comparison doesn't include potential cost
increases for costs above debt coverage such as:
 Other capital projects for replacement of aging
infrastructure;
 Utilities, chemicals, other materials
 Personnel costs
 medical insurance coverage,
 PERS rates,
 COLA increases per contracts,
12
JOP
 INTERESTS
 CRW – optimal plant operation, protection of territory




boundaries and meeting water needs of customers – retail and
wholesale
NCCWC – optimal plant operation and delivery of water to
SWA, Oak Lodge and Gladstone
SFWB – optimal plant operation and delivery of water to
Oregon City (current and future) and West Linn (current and
future)
All – sufficient revenue to cover all fixed and variable costs
All – alternative source(s) of water if Clackamas River is
compromised
13
Implementation
 Meeting those interests – cooperation and a
regional/rational approach to water production and
delivery
 Governance
 Sharing resources to the benefit of all participants
 Sharing technical expertise across region
 Management of each entity as a partner with the other
two
14
Leadership
 Eliminate US versus THEM attitude
 Partner on acquisition of alternative water
connections/sources
 Evaluate available expertise and partner for specialized
services
 Hydraulic Modeling
 Information Technology
 Lab services
 GIS
15
Joint Operations
 Overall benefits of big picture thinking include:
 Stewardship of the watershed and all users including:
 Lake Oswego-Tigard
 Estacada
 City of Milwaukie and Rockwood PUD (on wells)
 Reduced rate increases for customers – greater customer
satisfaction
 Delayed capital construction costs – particularly at the
water treatment plants
 Utilization of expertise without having to hire out – use the
expertise available at any of the entities
16
Joint Operations
Questions?
17
Acknowledgements
 My Family – no housework since September 2011
 My cohort – the most amazing and brilliant group I have
ever been associated with
 All of the Professors
 My advisor – Thank you Dr. Shinn
18
Download