Document 17873087

advertisement

Higher Education Today

• Increasing stratification, separate and unequal tiers

• In many ways reinforcing, and in some ways widening, inequality

 Political failure

No Longer the International Leader

Inequality in College Degrees

Estimated Percentage of U.S. Population with

4-yr. College Degree by Age 24, by Family Income

Quartile, 1970-2011

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

6

10 11

15 15

30

40

71

1970

2011

Bottom 2nd 3rd Top

Source: Thomas G. Mortenson, “Family Income and Unequal Educational Opportunity, 1970-2011,” Postsecondary Education

Opportunity, 245 (2012), www.postsecondary.org

For-Profits

Private

Nonprofits

Stratification of Colleges

(Sources: College Board)

Published

Tuition &

Fees

(“Sticker

Prices”)

2012-2013

$15,172

Percentage of First-Time

Full-time

Students

Seeking BA who earn it within 6 years

22%

Percentage of Students

With Federal

Loans, 2007-

2008

94% (BA)

97% (AS)

Median

Student

Debt

(among

2007-08 graduates)

$32,700 (BA)

$18,800 (AS)

$29,056 65% 69% $17,700

Default

Rates

Among

Borrowers, after 3 years

(2009)

23%

7%

Publics $8,655 (4 yr)

$3,131 (2 yr)

(in-state)

55% 58% (BA)

33% (AS)

$22,400(BA)

$7,100(AS)

8% (BA)

18% (AS)

It’s Not All About Tuition

• Can’t just blame the colleges/universities

• History of government support for higher education

It’s Not All About Aptitude

Percentage of Students Who Received 4 Year College

Degree or More, by Test Scores and Income, 2000

74 80

70

60

50

51

47

40

30 29

30

21

20

10

7 8

3

0

Low income Middle income High income

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Education

Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS: 88/2000), "Fourth Follow-up," unpublished data.

Low score

Middle score

High score

Research Methods

• Analysis of government documents, historical record

• Interviews with policymakers

• Statistical analysis of historical data on state spending and revenues

What Explains It?

• POLICYSCAPE

– A political terrain that is densely cluttered with policies created at earlier points in time

– Requires maintenance & updating

• If left untended, problems ensue :

• Policy design effects

• Unintended consequences

• Lateral effects

Policy Upkeep Depends on Politics

• To what extent do policymakers manage existing programs?

Contemporary Obstacles:

• Polarization

• Plutocracy

I. Diminishing Opportunity in Federal Student Aid

$7 000

$6 000

$5 000

$4 000

$3 000

$2 000

$1 000

$0

Pell Grants Fall Behind and Student Borrowing Soars as

Tuition Rises at 4-Yr Public Universities (2010 Dollars)

$8 000 $25 000

$20 000

$15 000

$10 000

$5 000

$0

Tuition, 4 Yr Publics, 2010 Dollars Average Pell Grant, 2010 Dollars Avg. Student Loan Debt at Graduation, 2010 $

Sources: U.S. Department of Education; Digest of Educational Statistics; FinAid.org

Rising Polarization in Congress 

Demise of Effective Lawmaking for Federal Student Aid

1,2 100

1

0,8

0,6

0,4

0,2

GI Bill

(1944)

0

NDEA

(1958)

HEA

(1965)

Pells

(1972)

40

20

0

-20

80

60

House, degree of overall partisan polarization (DW-Nominate)

Senate, degree of overall partisan polarization (DW-Nominate)

Sources: Voteview.com; authors’ analysis of roll call votes

Growing Partisan Gaps in Support for

Amendments to Higher Education Laws, 1971-

2008

70

60

60

51

50

40

29

31

37

30

House

Senate

20

13

10

0

1971- 1980 1981-94 1995 -2008

Source: Author’s analysis of roll call votes on amendments. N=65 in House, 26 in Senate

Tuition Relief Through the Tax System:

Costly Alternatives…With Less Impact

• Hope, Lifetime Learning

Tax Credits, 1997

• American Opportunity

Tax Credit, 2009

– Largest share goes to families with household incomes between

$100,000-$180,000

*Such policies fail to expand access to college.

*As of 2013, they cost the

U.S. $16.7 billion—44% of the cost of Pell Grants

($38.2 billion).

II. Sinking Support for Public

Universities and Colleges

• 73% of American college students attend

• State spending per student declined 26%

(real),1990 to 2010

• Tuition rose by 113%

(real), 1990 to 2010

• Declining graduation rates

The Unequal Impact of Rising Tuition Costs

Fig. 4.1 Percentage of Family Income Required to Pay Cost of

Attending Public Four-Year Institutions, by Income Quintile,

114

1971 and 2011

120

100

80

60

42

46

40

20

29

19

13

10

19

0

Bottom Second Middle Fourth

Source: Donald E. Heller, "Trends in the Affordabilityof Public Colleges and Universities," in Donald E. Heller, ed., The States and Public Higher Education, (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins

University Press: , 2011), p. 22. Updated with College Board . 2012. "Trends in College Pricing" http://trends.collegeboard.org/college-pricing. U.S. Census Bureau "Table F-3 Mean Income Received by Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of Families" http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/families/.

6

9

Highest

1971

2011

Higher Education Squeezed Out As Mandatory

Costs Take a Larger Share of State Budgets

$3 000

$2 500

$2 000

$1 500

$1 000

$500

$0

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Tax Revenues

K-12

Medicaid

Higher Ed

Prison

Sources: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Center for the Study of Education Policy; State and Local Gov’t Finance Data Query System; Urban-Institute Brookings Tax Policy Center; U.S. Census

Bureau; Kaiser Family Foundation

III. Rise of the For-Profit Colleges

For-Profit Colleges: Promoting

Opportunity?

• Low graduation rates: 22%

• 94% of students borrow for BA degree, and borrow highest median rates of any sector

($33,000)

• Account for 47 percent of student loan defaults; 23% default within 3 years

70%

Total Enrollment in Degree-granting Postsecondary

Institutions by Race and Institution Type, 2012

(Source: Digest of Education Statistics)

63%

61%

60%

54%

50%

47%

40%

30%

29%

White

Black

Hispanic

Other

20%

12%

8%

16%

11%

12%

15% 15%

20%

11%

10%

15%

9%

0%

Private Non-profit Public 4-yr Public 2-yr For-Profit

Private Sector?

Each permitted by law to received up to 90 percent of revenues from Higher

Education Act’s Title IV; on average, receive 86 percent.

Attended by 10 percent of students; use $1 in $4 of

Higher Education Act’s

Title IV, 37% of Post 9/11

GI Bill, and 50% of DOD ed programs.

From Bipartisan Efforts for Reform…

(1950s – 1992)

…to Bipartisan Protection of the

Industry (1995-present)

• Deregulation:

– 85/15  90/10

– End of 50% on campus requirement

• Watering down gainful employment rules

Restoring the Public Purposes of

Higher Education

Download