LATINAMERICAN REGIONAL
WORKSHOP
BOGOTA D.C, COLOMBIA
GENERAL INFORMATION
• Participants: Colombia, Bolivia (CSO) and
Ecuador
• OAS (observer)
• The Core Team of the Evaluation and the
United States as a member of the
Management Group
• November 4th-5th, 2009
REGIONAL CONTEXT
•
•
•
•
•
Particularities of MIC’s
Diversity
Relative importance of Aid in Development
Role of CSO
Other modalities of Aid (SSC and triangular)
STARTING POINT
• Identify regional specifities that have
influence in generic ToR.
• Other regional specificities will go in the
National ToR.
INPUTS TO CORE QUESTION 1:
Context
• The evaluation should focus on aid influenced by
the PD.
• It is important to identify the weight of this aid on
the total resources.
• It is important to analyze sub-national context.
• To assess motivations and interest of key national
actors (executive, Parliament, local government,
CSO, private sector and media.
• Coherence between donors HQ and field offices.
INPUTS TO CORE QUESTION 2:
Effects on Aid Effectiveness
• PD results should be group around the 3
priorities of AAA.
• Importance to receive actions suggested
by AAA
INPUTS TO CORE QUESTION 3:
Effects on Development Results
• Analyze the effects on national
organizations and social capital.
• Analyze the effects on inequality
INPUTS TO CORE QUESTION 4:
Alternative Approaches
• To consider other donors and financial
sources that seek to promote aid
effectiveness regardless PD.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
• CSO participation on the National
Reference Group.
• To promote public consultation process
in key moments of the evaluation.
• To analyze the possibility to involve other
countries in the evaluation.