Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland Masters Level Equivalence Report An applicant for CSci, whose degree is at Bachelors level, will need to submit a report, ~1000 words long, to indicate that subsequent work undertaken has been at a level equivalent to a Masters Degree dissertation. (Reports >2000 words long will be returned to the applicant for editing.) The following statements describe the attributes applicants for CSci must demonstrate at Masters level. Applicants are not expected to demonstrate all of these attributes. A Chartered Scientist would: 1. Problem-solving skills Have the ability to formulate problems in precise terms and to identify key issues. Have the ability to tackle open-ended problems and problems of an unfamiliar nature using appropriate methodology and taking into account the possible absence of complete data. Have the confidence to try different approaches in order to make progress on challenging problems. Use mathematics in problem solving. 2. Investigative Skill Manipulate precise and intricate ideas, to construct logical arguments and to use technical language correctly. Undertake independent investigations. Have the skills required to aid the investigation by utilising relevant textbooks and other available literature including databases and the Internet and interact with colleagues to derive information to support the investigation. Critically analyse results and draw valid conclusions based on the data generated. Understand error analysis and be able to compare results obtained with expected outcomes, theoretical predictions or with published data. Evaluate the significance of the results in context. 3. Experimental work Carry out experimental with some originality and work independently or manage the work of others. Make best use of recognised analytical methods relevant to the situation. Analyse results and draw sound conclusions. Page 1/2 - Relate any conclusions made to current theories. Critically compare the results of model calculations with those from experiment and observation. Use specialised equipment; identify appropriate pieces of equipment and master new techniques and equipment. In the Masters-Level Equivalence report, the use of past reports, written as part of the applicant’s work and professional development, is encouraged rather than re-writing such past reports. The applicant must attest that the report represents their own work, and the Society reserves the right to make enquiries as to authenticity. Where the work reported has been carried out with the applicant working as part of a team, it is imperative that the applicant’s contributions to the work are clearly delineated and due acknowledgement given to the contributions of the other team members. The types of work that may form the basis of the Masters Equivalence Report correspond in level to project reports produced in the final year of a four year integrated Masters degree, or a one year MSc programme, but need not be a thesis. They may include: Investigation and reporting of a project/problem in any area of Mineral Science, Geoscience, Materials Science, Geochemical Science. A piece of academic research published in a peer reviewed journal An internal technical report Design and analysis of a survey of (e.g.) contaminated land with recommendations and conclusions An assessment of a landfill site and its possible impact on adjacent groundwater systems or gas generation Environmental impact assessment that contains a significant geological component A modelling-based investigation of a geological, or geochemical phenomenon N.B. This list is not exhaustive or prescriptive. The Masters Equivalence report will be assessed by Society-appointed scrutineers and they will also be responsible for assessing the application overall. These scrutineers will be selected for their knowledge of the subject area expertise/competence claimed by the applicant. Assessment of Equivalence will be made solely on the Report submitted. Reports will be kept by the Society but will remain confidential. If an application for CSci is unsuccessful then a new submission may be made at any time, without prejudice. Page 2/2