Turn your speakers on! the slides will forward automatically.

advertisement

Turn your speakers on!

You must click to the next slide; thereafter, the slides will forward automatically.

Are you ready to take notes? Proceed!

This Power Point Presentation can be viewed in 20 minutes.

CONSIDERING

ETHICAL THEORIES

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

STRATEGY #6

PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT TASK #6

What four aspects of the theories we’ve reviewed could help you think more fully about ethical dilemmas?

What two aspects of the theories would you reject outright? Why?

DO THEORETICAL

PERSPECTIVES PROVIDE

US WITH THE “RULES”

OR EFFECTIVE

“PRINCIPLES” NEEDED TO

LIVE AN ETHICAL LIFE?

Lawrence Kohlberg:

Morality goes well beyond rule-making; following rules, in fact, is the “easy” way out – keeps us “safe”

TIBETAN PROTEST

VIDEO LINK

UTILITARIAN

Must consider the

“greatest good” for the greatest number: Moves away from rule-following

(to a degree) to focus on justice/equality

So, how do we decide

“right action”?

That’s your challenge in

Performance Assessment

Strategy #6.

TELEOLOGICAL THEORIES

The consequences (as opposed to motives or intentions) determine an act’s worth or correctness. That is, the rightness or wrongness of an act can be judged by the result.

DEONTOLOGICAL

THEORIES

Rule or law centered:

What is right and what is wrong does not depend on outcome but on principles or rules applied in making the decision

Think of a situation where such a perspective might be acceptable and one where it might be totally unacceptable

Might we not also consider relationships:

Debtor to Creditor

Parent to Child

Citizen to Citizen

Might we not also consider relationships:

Debtor to Creditor

Parent to Child

Citizen to Citizen

Prima Facie Duty:

Presumption That Duty Exists

A parent… must care for a child.

A worker…must go to work and do a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay.

A citizen…must not dump oil down the storm drain.

But how does one WEIGH prima facie obligations against each other?

Indeed, we experience

COMPETING interests and obligations.

W. D. ROSS

No general rules can be laid down

ARISTOTLE

“Practical wisdom”/

“Intellectual wisdom”

ARISTOTLE

Recall the truths we have learned, “inspect them,” make sense of them –

“practical wisdom”

We have obligations in our community – to our employer, our nation, our family – and we must balance these competing values, yes?

THOMAS NAGEL

“A reasoned capacity exists for balancing values.”

Aristotle, Nagel, Ross – all agree we can reason

We can reason rationally, though, without “rules”

Others argue: If we can reason, shouldn’t we be able to make these reasons explicit? Shouldn’t we be able to come up with the “rules”?

OBLIGATIONS, RIGHTS,

JUSTICE, DUTY – ALL

CONFLICT CONSTANTLY

IN…

MEDICAL RESEARCH

POLITICS

PERSONAL LIFE

Obviously, centuries of philosophical debate have not brought consensus on what constitutes ethical decision-making!

THE ABILITY TO

FORMULATE EXPLICIT

RULES IN PRINCIPLE

IS PRETTY THIN!

DO WE LEARN LANGUAGE

BY LEARNING THE

RULES?

DO WE NOT LEARN

MUSIC, LANGUAGE,

BLACKSMITHING, AND

ETHICS BY MASTERING

BODIES OF PRACTICE

RATHER THAN BY

LEARNING SPECIFIC

RULES?

SO, HOW DO WE DO

THE WEIGHING?

IF THERE ARE REASONS,

SHOULDN’T WE BE ABLE

TO FORMULATE THEM?

W. D. ROSS

“We must balance…No general rules, so far as I can see, can be laid down. We can only say that we have duties to keep our promises, to repair wrongs we’ve done, and to compensate for services we’ve received.”

CONSIDERING

ETHICAL THEORIES

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

STRATEGY #6

PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT TASK #6

What four aspects of the theories we’ve reviewed could help you think more fully about ethical dilemmas?

Develop concrete examples for each of your four: That is, what dilemmas do you face that could be addressed by…

What two aspects of the theories would you reject outright? Why?

EXPECTATION OF

PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT STRATEGY #6

A BEGINNING

INVESTIGATION/

CONSIDERATION

ONE-MINUTE WRITING

What did you learn

BEST today?

Anything new or interesting? Do you feel you’ve mastered the basics of the theories?

What concepts or ideas do you understand the

LEAST? What do you wish the instructor had reviewed or explained more clearly?

Download