Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Scoring Guide 1

advertisement
Ethical Theories Presentation
LP 5 Scoring Guide 1
Rating Scale
High Points
Excellent; criterion is fully addressed; criterion is understood by lay audience
Mid-Points
Satisfactory; criterion is met but minor errors or omissions exist; occasionally unclear to learners
Low Points
Needs improvement; criterion is attempted but major errors or omissions exist; used language that was
generally not well understood by peers
0 Points
Unacceptable or not found
Scoring Guide
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Criteria
You focus solely on your assigned ethical theory.
You summarize your ethical theory.
You explain the contributions of at least one individual (two
when possible) who have influenced the development of the
ethical theory.
You examine at least two criticisms of the theory.
You apply the theory to a current ethical dilemma.
You pose at least two (preferably three) review questions for
discussion.
CORE ABILITIES (Communicate Clearly)
You produce readable, concise slides: Student names on 1st
- slides are written in at least 24 font
-each slide must have a heading reflecting a criterion in
sequential order
- you use varying slide lay-outs
- you limit words to 15-20 per slide
- you use succinct phrases vs. sentences
- you use bulleted points and limit each bullet to words
- you use easy-to-view color combinations
- you use high-quality photo images
- you use correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
You use at least four sources (one of which may be your text).
You document information by copying URL or Weston page
number into "Notes View" on every slide where you use
source information. Use APA reference
You develop a minimum of 15 slides.
During presentation to class:
- you fill in information not provided on slides (in short, you
"talk" to us)
- you design slides to supplement, not be, your presentation
- you use language understandable to your classmates
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE
TOTAL POINTS EARNED
Name _________________________________________
Date ____________
Evaluator's Signature _________________________________ Date ____________
Comments:
Ratings
Yes Revise Project
10 8 4 0
10 8 4 0
10
10
8 4
8 4
5 0
0
0
20
15
8
0
5 0
10 8 4
0
5 0
15 8
0
20
105
Download