Federal Awards Compliance Audit Guidance
NAME OF CLIENT:
YEAR ENDED:
12/31/15
FEDERAL AWARD
NAME:
Social Services Block Grant (Title XX)
CFDA#:
#93.667
This File has been broken into following sections:


Introduction- Materiality Sheet
Part I- General OMB Compliance Supplement Information,

Part II- ODJFS Program Specific Information,

Part III- Applicable Compliance Requirement Guidance
o OMB compliance requirements
o ODJFS compliance requirements
o Audit Objectives and Control Testing Procedures
o Suggested Audit Procedures- Compliance/Substantive Tests
o Audit Implications Summary

Program Testing Conclusion
Important File Information (please read)
Non-UG vs UG FACCRS
This FACCR was written for programs awarded and continuing awards still subject to non-UG
requirements. If your major program has UG award expenditures you’ll also need to incorporate and test
applicable UG sections, see bullet two for further information.


You must document in your w/p’s how the determination was made that this major program fell under the
old OMB Circulars (A-87 & A-102), as opposed to the new Uniform Guidance. AOS staff see also the
federal FAQs page for guidance in determining UG at
http://portal/BP/Intranet/Webinar%20Supplemental%20Materials/Federal%20FAQ%27s.pdf
If you have determined that UG transactions require to be tested, you will need to open the applicable
compliance sections that are available on our intranet on the federal info page and the UG FACCR
sections by agency. AOS staff should use the sections located on the intranet since the majority of the
links do not require an active internet connection. IPA’s will have access to the same information on our
internet at https://ohioauditor.gov/references/practiceaids/faccrs.html however all links in these copies will
require an active internet connection. If auditors need a UG section that is not available, please contact
the CFAE. Since the UG has been adopted by each federal agency and with possible
adjustments/exceptions, auditors will need to make sure that they pull the applicable agency specific UG.
For AOS staff, complete the applicable UG sections and link them to testing and save them within
teammate, however you will not need to select separate samples or stratify populations, just make sure
that compliance steps that have been added or modified because of UG implementation have been
added as testing attributes within your compliance tests. New or modified steps have been identified
within the UG compliance sections. Auditors need to determine if control testing is sufficient for both A133 and UG transactions and if additional control testing is necessary for UG specific requirements.
Updating the FACCR
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 1 of 92
Users can modify/add to the Audit Objectives/Control Procedures, Suggested Audit Procedures, Audit
Implications Summary and Program Testing Conclusion sections. Guidance sections have been locked
and cannot be edited. Selecting the review tab and clicking on the restrict formatting and editing button
will bring up the restrict formatting box. Clicking on the “show all regions I can edit” will highlight all the
editable areas within the document.
NAVIGATION PANE
This file has been arranged to be navigable. Click on the view tab above and check the box that says
“Navigation Pane” to bring up the headings. Click on the various sections within the navigation pane to
go directly to that section.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents starts on page 3. On the table of contents page, users can also click on listed
sections to go directly to that section. Please note that as information is added into the unrestricted
portions of the faccrs, page numbering can change and will not necessarily reflect the footer page
numbers. The table of contents can be updated to reflect the proper footer page numbers by clicking on
word “contents” directly above the line starting with Introduction, will bring up the icon “update table”.
Clicking on the update table icon will allow users to update the page numbers to reflect current footer
page numbers.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 2 of 92
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Contents
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................................3
Introduction: Materiality by Compliance Requirement ................................................................................................5
Part I – OMB Compliance Supplement Information ...................................................................................................9
Part II – ODJFS Program Specific Information ........................................................................................................ 11
(1.) Program overview .......................................................................................................................................... 11
(2.) Program Funding ........................................................................................................................................... 15
(3.) AOS Testing Considerations ......................................................................................................................... 16
(4.) Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ..................................................................... 16
(5.) Information systems, including a description on how they operate (i.e. CRIS-E, CFIS Web, CFIS Web LR)
............................................................................................................................................................................. 17
Part III – Applicable Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................... 19
A. Activities Allowed and Unallowed .................................................................................................................... 19
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 19
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 21
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 24
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 27
Audit Implication Summary............................................................................................................................... 30
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ...................................................................................................................... 31
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 31
OMB Circular A-87 Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments ..................................... 33
Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs ............................................................................. 34
Allowable Costs - State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect .......................................... 37
Allowable Costs - State Public Assistance Agency Costs ............................................................................... 39
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 40
ICRP (Testing of the Program) ......................................................................................................................... 42
List of Selected Items of Cost Contained in OMB Cost Principles Circular A-87 (codified in 2 CFR Part 225) 44
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 47
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs- Compliance Audit Objectives and Suggested Audit Procedures Compliance (Substantive Tests) ...................................................................................................................... 48
State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect -Compliance Audit Objectives and Suggested
Audit Procedures Compliance (Substantive Tests).......................................................................................... 51
State Public Assistance Agency Costs - Compliance Audit Objectives and Suggested Audit Procedures
Compliance (Substantive Tests) ...................................................................................................................... 54
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 57
C. Cash Management .......................................................................................................................................... 58
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 58
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 59
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 3 of 92
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 60
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 62
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 63
E. Eligibility ........................................................................................................................................................... 64
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 64
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 65
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 66
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 67
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 69
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds (“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR) ......................... 70
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 70
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 72
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 73
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 74
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 75
L. Reporting .......................................................................................................................................................... 76
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 76
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 77
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 80
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 81
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 82
M. Subrecipient Monitoring .................................................................................................................................. 83
OMB Compliance Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 83
ODJFS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................................. 85
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures ........................................................................................................ 86
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) .................................................................... 88
Audit Implications Summary ............................................................................................................................. 90
Program Testing Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 91
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 4 of 92
Introduction
Introduction: Materiality by Compliance Requirement
(1)
Applicable per
Compliance
Supplement
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Compliance Requirement
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Cash Management
Reserved
Eligibility
F.
Equipment & Real Property Mgmt
G.
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmark
H.
I.
Period of Availability
Procurement & Sus. & Debarment
J.
Program Income
K.
L.
M.
N.
Reserved
Reporting
Subrecipient Monitoring
Special Tests & Provisions
(Provide an assessment for each)
(Yes or No)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Planning Federal Materiality by Compliance Requirement
(2)
(6)
(6)
(3)
Direct &
If monetary,
material to
population
Inherent risk
program /
Monetary or
subject to
(IR)
entity
nonmonetary
requirement
assessment
(Yes or No)
(M/N)
M
M
N
(Dollars)
(High/Low)
(4)
(5)
Final control
risk (CR)
assessment
Detection risk of
noncompliance
(High/Low)
(6)
Federal
materiality by
Overall audit risk of compliance
noncompliance
requirement
(High/Low)
typically 5% of
population
sub ject to
requirement
5%
5%
5%
No (per OMB
supplement)
No (per OMB
supplement)
No (Per ODJFS there
are no OMB
rquirements at the
County level)
Yes
No (OMB
requirements do not
apply to SSBG. See
also OAC 5101:9-4No (per OMB
supplement)
M/N
5%
M
5%
M
5%
M
N
5%
5%
M
5%
Yes
Yes
No (per OMB
supplement)
N
N
5%
5%
5%
Normally if OMB lists a section as n/a it does not apply to the program, however, if specific information comes to your attention (e.g. during the normal
review of the grant agreement or discussions with management) that provides evidence that a compliance requirement cold have a material effect on
a mor program, you would be expected to test the requirement. This circumstance should arise infrequently. If it is deemed material, contact the
CFAE for testing guidance.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
(High/Low)
(5)
Page 5 of 92
Introduction
(1)
Taken form Part 2, Compliance Requirements, of the OMB Compliance Supplement (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/financial_fin_single_audit/ ). When Part 2 of the Compliance Supplement
indicates that a type of compliance requirement is not applicable, the remaining assessments for the compliance requirement are not applicable.
(2)
If the Supplement notes a compliance requirement as being applicable to the program in column (1), it still may not apply at a particular entity either because that entity does not have activity
subject to that type of compliance requirement, or the activity could not have a material effect on a major program. If the Compliance Supplement indicates that a type of compliance requirement is
applicable and the auditor determines it also is direct and material to the program at the specific entity being audited, the auditor should answer this question “Yes,” and then complete the remainder of the
line to document the various risk assessments, sample sizes, and references to testing. Alternatively, if the auditor determines that a particular type of compliance requirement that normally would be
applicable to a program (as per part 2 of the Compliance Supplement) is not direct and material to the program at the specific entity being audited, the auditor should answer this question “No.” Along with
that response, the auditor should document the basis for the determination (for example, "Procurement and Suspension/Debarment does not apply because there were no applicable procurements in the
current period" or "per the Compliance Supplement, eligibility requirements only apply at the state level").
(3)
Refer to the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits, chapter 20, Compliance Auditing Applicable to Major Programs, for considerations relating to assessing
inherent risk of noncompliance for each direct and material type of compliance requirement. The auditor is expected to document the inherent risk assessment for each direct and material compliance
requirement.
(4)
Refer to the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits, chapter 19, Consideration of Internal Control Over Compliance for Major Programs (Uniform Guidance), for
considerations relating to assessing control risk of noncompliance for each direct and material types of compliance requirement. To determine the control risk assessment, the auditor is to document the
five internal control components of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (that is, control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and
communication, and monitoring) for each direct and material type of compliance requirement. Keep in mind that the auditor is expected to perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal control
over compliance for federal programs that is sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk. If internal control over compliance for a type of compliance requirement is likely to be
ineffective in preventing or detecting noncompliance, then the auditor is not required to plan and perform tests of internal control over compliance. Rather, the auditor must assess control risk at maximum,
determine whether additional compliance tests are required, and report a significant deficiency (or material weakness) as part of the audit findings. The control risk assessment is based upon the auditor's
understanding of controls, which would be documented outside of this template. Auditors may use the practice aid, Controls Overview Document, to support their control assessment. The Controls
Overview Document assists the auditor in documenting the elements of COSO, identifying key controls, testing of those controls, and concluding on control risk. The practice aid is available in either a
checklist or narrative format.
(5)
Audit risk of noncompliance is defined in AICPA, Professional Standards, AU-C 935.11, (SAS 117) as the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion on the entity's compliance when
material noncompliance exists. Audit risk of noncompliance is a function of the risks of material noncompliance and detection risk of noncompliance.
(6)
CFAE included the typical monetary vs. nonmonetary determinations for each compliance requirement in this program. However, auditors should tailor these assessments as appropriate based
on the facts and circumstances of their entity’s operations. AICPA Single Audit Guide 20.48 states the auditor's tests of compliance with compliance requirements may disclose instances of
noncompliance. The Uniform Guidance refers to these instances of noncompliance, among other matters, as “audit findings.” Such findings may be of a monetary nature and involve questioned costs or
may be nonmonetary and not result in questioned costs. AU-C 935.13 & .A7 require auditors to establish and document two materiality levels: (1) a materiality level for the program as a whole. The
column above documents quantitative materiality at the PROGRAM LEVEL for each major program; and (2) a second materiality level for the each of the applicable 12 compliance requirements listed.
Note:
a. If the compliance requirement is of a monetary nature, and
b. The requirement applies to the total population of program expenditure,
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 6 of 92
Introduction
Then the compliance materiality amount for the program also equals materiality for the requirement. For example, the population for allowable costs and cost principles will usually equal the total Federal
expenditures for the major program as a whole. Conversely, the population for some monetary compliance requirements may be less than the total Federal expenditures. Auditors must carefully
determine the population subject to the compliance requirement to properly assess Federal materiality. Auditors should also consider the qualitative aspects of materiality. For example, in some cases,
noncompliance and internal control deficiencies that might otherwise be immaterial could be significant to the major program because they involve fraud, abuse, or illegal acts. Auditors should document
PROGRAM LEVEL materiality in the Record of Single Audit Risk (RSAR).
(Source: AOS CFAE)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 7 of 92
Introduction
Performing Tests to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Controls throughout this FACCR
Auditors should consider the following when evaluating, documenting, and testing the effectiveness of controls
throughout this FACCR:
As noted in paragraph 19.07, the Uniform Guidance provides that the auditors must perform tests of internal
controls over compliance as planned. (Paragraphs 19.30-19.32 of the AICPA Government Auditing Standards
and Single Audit Guide discuss an exception related to ineffective internal control over compliance.) In addition,
AU-C 330.08 states the auditor should design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence about the operating effectiveness of relevant controls. Further AU-C 330.09 states in designing and
performing tests of controls, the auditor should obtain more persuasive audit evidence the greater the reliance the
auditor places on the effectiveness of a control. Testing of the operating effectiveness of controls ordinarily
includes procedures such as (a) inquiries of appropriate entity personnel, including grant and contract managers;
(b) the inspection of documents, reports, or electronic files indicating performance of the control; (c) the
observation of the application of the specific controls; and (d) reperformance of the application of the control by
the auditor. The auditor should perform such procedures regardless of whether he or she would otherwise choose
to obtain evidence to support an assessment of control risk below the maximum level.
Paragraph .A24 of AU-C section 330 provides guidance related to the testing of controls. When responding to the
risk assessment, the auditor may design a test of controls to be performed concurrently with a test of details on
the same transactions. Although the purpose of a test of controls is different from the purpose of a test of details,
both may be accomplished concurrently by performing a test of controls and a test of details on the same
transaction (a dual-purpose test). For example, the auditor may examine an invoice to determine whether it has
been approved and whether it provides substantive evidence of a transaction. A dual-purpose test is designed
and evaluated by considering each purpose of the test separately. Also, when performing the tests, the auditor
should consider how the outcome of the test of controls may affect the auditor's determination about the extent of
substantive procedures to be performed. See chapter 21 of this guide for a discussion of the use of dual-purpose
samples in a compliance audit. (Source: Paragraphs 19.34 and 19.36 of the AICPA Government Auditing
Standards and Single Audit Guide)
Under OMB guidance, Public Law (Pub. L.) No. 107-300, the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, as
amended by Pub. L. No. 111-204, the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act, Executive Order 13520
on reducing improper payments, and the June 18, 2010 Presidential memorandum to enhance payment
accuracy, Federal agencies are required to take actions to prevent improper payments, review Federal awards for
such payments, and, as applicable, reclaim improper payments. Improper payment means:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Any payment that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount under
statutory, contractual, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements.
Incorrect amounts are overpayments or underpayments that are made to eligible recipients
(including inappropriate denials of payment or service, any payment that does not account for
credit for applicable discounts, payments that are for the incorrect amount, and duplicate
payments).
Any payment that was made to an ineligible recipient or for an ineligible good or service, or
payments for goods or services not received (except for such payments where authorized by
law).
Any payment that an agency’s review is unable to discern whether a payment was proper as a
result of insufficient or lack of documentation.
Auditors should be alert to improper payments, particularly when testing the following parts - A,
“Activities Allowed or Unallowed;” B, “Allowable Costs/Cost Principles;” E, “Eligibility;” and, in some
cases, N, “Special Tests and Provisions.”
(Source: 2015 OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 3)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 8 of 92
Part I – OMB Compliance Supplement Information
Part I – OMB Compliance Supplement Information
I. Program Objectives
The purpose of the Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) program is to provide funds to States (including the
District of Columbia and five territories) to provide services for individuals, families, and entire population groups
in one or more of the following areas: (1) achieving or maintaining economic self-support and self-sufficiency to
prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency; (2) preventing or remedying neglect, abuse, or exploitation of children
and adults unable to protect their own interests; (3) preserving, rehabilitating, or reuniting families; (4) preventing
or reducing inappropriate institutional care by providing for community-based care, home-based care, or other
forms of intensive care; and (5) securing referral or admission for institutional care when other forms of care are
not appropriate, or providing services to individuals in institutions.
II. Program Procedures
Administration and Services
The SSBG program is administered by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), a component of the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Funds are awarded based on the State's population following
receipt and review of the State's report on the proposed use of funds for the coming year, which serves as the
State's plan. States have the flexibility to determine what services will be provided, consistent with the statutory
goals and objectives, who is eligible, and how funds will be distributed among services and entities within the
State, including whether to provide services directly or obtain them from other public or private agencies and
individuals. The State must also conduct a public hearing on the proposed use and distribution of funds, as
included in the report, as a prerequisite to the receipt of SSBG funds.
III. Source of Governing Requirements
The SSBG program is authorized under Title XX of the Social Security Act, as amended, and is codified at 42
USC 1397 through 1397e. The implementing regulations for this and other block grant programs authorized by
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 are published at 45 CFR part 96. Those regulations include both
specific requirements and general administrative requirements in lieu of 45 CFR part 92 (the HHS implementation
of the A-102 Common Rule/45 CFR part 75 (the HHS implementation of 2 CFR part 200) for the covered block
grant programs. Requirements specific to SSBG are in 45 CFR sections 96.70 through 96.74.
As discussed in Appendix I to the Supplement, Federal Programs Excluded from the A-102 Common Rule and
Portions of 2 CFR Part 200, States are to use the fiscal policies that apply to their own funds in administering
SSBG. Procedures must be adequate to assure the proper disbursal of and accounting for Federal funds paid to
the grantee, including procedures for monitoring the assistance provided (45 CFR section 96.30).
Under the block grant philosophy, each State is responsible for designing and implementing its own SSBG
program, within very broad Federal guidelines. States must administer their SSBG program according to their
approved plan and any amendments and in conformance with the their own implementing rules and policies.
Other Sources:

2 CFR 225 is the codification of OMB Circular A-87 (Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments) https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2013-title2-vol1/pdf/CFR-2013-title2-vol1part225.pdf
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 9 of 92
Part I – OMB Compliance Supplement Information


45 CFR 92 includes the Health and Human Services OMB Circular A-102 Grants Management
Common Rule (State & Local Governments) https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2014-title45vol1/pdf/CFR-2014-title45-vol1-chapA-subchapA.pdf
45 CFR 74 includes the Health and Human Services OMB Circular A-110 (universities & non-profit
organizations). OMB Circular A-110 was codified into 2 CFR 215. (references to A-110 / 2 CFR 215
have been eliminated as this FACCR is not for universities or non-profit organizations)
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2013-title45-vol1/pdf/CFR-2013-title45-vol1-part74.pdf
Auditors should cite using the applicable codified CFR references and not the OMB Circulars for
noncompliance.
Other Information
Transfers out of SSBG
As discussed in III.A, 'Activities Allowed or Unallowed,' funds may be transferred out of SSBG to other Federal
programs. The amounts transferred out of SSBG are subject to the requirements of the program into which they
are transferred and should not be included in the audit universe and total expenditures of SSBG when
determining Type A programs. On the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, the amount transferred out
should not be shown as SSBG expenditures but should be shown as expenditures for the program into which they
are transferred.
Transfers into SSBG
A State may transfer up to 10 percent of the combined total of the State family assistance grant, supplemental
grant for population increases, and bonus funds for high performance and illegitimacy reduction, if any, (all part of
TANF) for a given fiscal year to carry out programs under the SSBG. Such amounts may be used only for
programs or services to children or their families whose income is less than 200 percent of the poverty level. The
amount of the transfers is reflected on the quarterly ACF-196, TANF Financial Report. The amounts transferred
into this program are subject to the requirements of this program when expended and should be included in the
audit universe and total expenditures of this program when determining Type A programs. On the Schedule of
Expenditures of Federal Awards, the amounts transferred in should be shown as expenditures of this program
when such amounts.
AOS Note: Per ODJFS, these transfers are made at the State level only. However, if the State does
change the County’s allocation due to a transfer, such as TANF from Title XX, the expenditures made
from these monies are subject to TANF guidelines.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 10 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
Part II – ODJFS Program Specific Information
Part II- The ODJFS Program Specific Information is broken into 5 sections: (1) Program Overview, (2)
Program Funding, (3) AOS Testing Considerations, (4) Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of
Federal Awards, (5) Information Systems, Including a description on how they operation (i.e. CRIS-E, CFIS
Web, CFIS Web LR)
(1.) Program overview
This program is to provide services meeting the very broad Program Objectives noted in Part 1 of the
Introduction.
ODJFS requires the counties to establish a plan for use of these monies. Counties also have the flexibility to
determine what services will be provided, consistent with the statutory goals and objectives, who is eligible, and
how funds will be distributed among services and entities within the County, including whether to provide services
directly or obtain them from other public or private agencies and individuals. Under the block grant philosophy,
each County is responsible for designing and implementing its own SSBG program, within very broad
State/Federal guidelines. Counties must administer their SSBG program according to their approved plan and
any amendments and in conformance with their own implementing rules and policies.
Counties use these monies for a variety of services. Auditors should review the County plan, determine if
submitted to ODJFS and is within the program objectives. The County can amend its plan at any time. Auditors
should use the plan(s) in place during their audit. These plans are not archived on the ODJFS website. Auditors
should obtain these plans from their County JFS Fiscal Office.
The State’s Comprehensive Title XX Social Services Plan is available at
http://emanuals.odjfs.state.oh.us/emanuals/GetDocument.do?nodeId=%23nodeid(109)&docId=Document(storage%3DREPOSITORY%2CdocID%3D%23nodeid(320454))&locSource=input&docLoc=%24REP_ROOT%24%23node-id(320454)&version=8.0.
Please note the OMB Compliance Supplement indicates this program is not subject to Circulars A102 or A87,
however, ODJFS requires the Counties to use State cost principles, which require the counties to follow Circulars
A102 and A87.
There are no matching requirements for this program. It is 100% federal monies. SSBG funds must be expended
by the State in the fiscal year allotted or in the succeeding fiscal year, providing for a two-year window. County
claims for reimbursement to ODJFS are due 1 quarter prior to 2 years after the calendar quarter in which the
County made the expenditure in order to be timely reported.
County Structure
Each County is segregated into the following three areas:

County Department of Job and Family Services (CDJFS) - Administers the Food Assistance (SNAP)
Cluster, TANF, Child Care Cluster, Social Services Block Grant, SCHIP, and Medicaid (i.e. all Public
Assistance programs).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 11 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information

Public Children Services Agency (PCSA) - Administers the Foster Care and Adoption Assistance
programs.

Child Support Enforcement Agency (CSEA) - Administers the Child Support Enforcement program.
Note: In some Counties, all three areas are combined (Combined Agencies), whereas in other Counties, there
may be two or three separate agencies.
Subgrant Agreement
Each County agency (or agencies) enters into an Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Subgrant
Agreement. This agreement describes the subgrant duties, ODJFS & subgrantee responsibilities, effective date
of the subgrant, amount of grant/payments, audits of subgrantee, suspension and termination, breach and default,
etc. Auditors should review their applicable County’s subgrant agreement. This agreement indicates if each
agency (Public Assistance (PA), Public Children Services Agency (PCSA), and Child Support (CS)) is a standalone agency or if they are combined agencies. This will determine the cost pools that will need tested as part of
the RMS process tested in Section A. The subgrant agreement for the FY16 and 17 was updated to include UG
requirements, In conversations with ODJFS they confirmed that for awards made for fiscal year 2016 and on will
be subject to UG. The 2016 grants passed down from ODJFS are funded on a federal fiscal year; therefore, the
UG grant funds cannot be spent or obligated until October 1, 2015, leaving a 3-month window of possible UG
activity. The various CFIS reports indicate grant years so receipt and expenditure of awards is identifiable.
ODJFS has county profiles and web links at http://jfs.ohio.gov/County/County_Directory.pdf.
County Collaborations
Collabor8
During 2011, Collabor8 was formed. The Collabor8 project involves nine county department and family services
that will work together under a common agreement to process and manage administrative workloads as one
project area. Wood and Knox counties started in December 2011, Hancock, Marion, Morrow & Sandusky came
on 1/2/12, Delaware in February 2012, and Carroll and Holmes in May 2015. The MOU was extended to June
30, 2017. The fiscal sharing splits for SFY 15 & 16 obtained from Collabor8 documentation provided are
below. This information is unaudited. Auditors should evaluate for accuracy / reasonableness not only the fiscal
split percentages used below but also any other costs allocated as a result of this collaborative effort. See FATL
346, dated 4-24-15 and FACT 55 dated 5/20/15 which lists approved collaborations and OAC 5101:4-1-16..
County
Carroll
Delaware
Hancock
Holmes
Knox
Marion
Marrow
Sandusky
Wood
Total
State Fiscal Year 15
IM Allocations
Percentage
$316,689
400,841
10.89%
13.79%
406,772
543,024
244,871
401,454
594,059
$2,907,710
13.99%
18.68%
8.42%
13.81%
20.43%
State Fiscal Year 16
IM Allocations
$251,125
304,021
392,200
309,662
393,753
533,376
254,666
413,945
615,691
$3,468,439
Percentage
7.24%
8.77%
11.31%
8.93%
11.35%
15.38%
7.34%
11.93%
17.75%
Joint County Department of Job and Family Services
Ohio Revised Code 329.40-329.46 allows for the formation of joint county departments of job and family services.
The boards of county commissioners of any two or more counties may enter into a written agreement to form a
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 12 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
joint county department of job and family services. Once the agreement is in effect, the department should
operate a single new entity replacing the contributing counties JFS offices. The agreements will specify the
reporting periods for the new departments, which are not required to be on a 12/31 reporting timeframe. If
auditors are aware of the formation of a new district they should inquire as soon as possible with the district to
determine the reporting period that was established. Auditors should familiarize themselves with the ORC code
sections mentions and should also obtain the agreement establishing the district; perform a GASB 61 evaluation
to determine if the district is a legally separate entity and if they are a subrecipient of ODJFS or of the contributing
counties. Also, keep in mind ORC 329.44 allows for JFS Districts to hold title to real property. Auditors will need
to evaluate if the district is holding title to real property and will need to import testing procedures from the nonARRA boilerplate faccr. Also keep in mind costs incurred for the acquisition of buildings and land, as “capital
expenditures,” are unallowable as direct charges, except where approved in advance by the awarding agency.
See 2 CFR 225, Appendix B, Section 15 (b) (1). We are aware of two districts that have currently formed. See
below. As communicated in FACTL 346 (effective 5-21-15) OAC 5101:4-1-16 was updated and designed county
collaborations as certification offices responsible for program operations which include, but not limited to:
application processing; eligibility determinations; and operation of employment and training programs. Approved
counties were removed from the code section and OAC 5101:4-1-16(B) indicates that approved county
collaborations can be found in the food assistant handbook at
http://emanuals.odjfs.state.oh.us/emanuals/GetDocument.do?doc=Document(storage%3DREPOSITORY%2Cdoc
ID%3D%23Ref_FSH)&locSource=input&docLoc=%24REP_ROOT%24%23Ref_FSH&username=guest&passwor
d=guest&publicationName=emanuals:
1. South Central Job and Family Services District is a combination of Ross, Vinton and Hocking
Counties and it is operating on a 6/30 state fiscal year end and,
2. Defiance/Paulding Consolidated Department of Job and Family Services is a combination of
Defiance and Paulding Counties and it is operating on a 12/31 calendar year end.
Additional information per meeting with ODJFS:



Counties cannot adopt policies to broaden or restrict the program.
ODJFS Bureau of Monitoring and Consulting Services (BMCS) performs ODJFS program County
compliance reviews. The Counties do receive written results of these reviews. Auditors should consider
the results of the reviews for planning purposes.
ODJFS in preparation for the transition of the Counties becoming subrecipients in 2009, provided to each
county a “Guided Self-Assessment for County Family Services Agencies” (GSA). This was a
comprehensive guide that incorporated the OMB compliance requirements, CFR and OAC requirements,
identified processes and controls ODJFS determined should be in place to meet specific federal
requirements and corresponding risk assumed by the agency. Each County should have had completed
the GSA, however these were never required. ODJFS no longer provides the templates and there is no
requirement that counties must have the GSA or continue to update the guides. Counties can have other
county prepared policies in place outside of the GSA, which would be just as acceptable as long as it
covered the key compliance areas the GSA addressed.
This is a brief description of the Fiscal Process (see also SFAE Testing Spreadsheet):

The County JFS receives different types of Funding:
1. Mandated Share – not applicable for Social Services Block Grant.
2. Federal Allocation – There are two ways federal monies are allocated by the State:
 Allocation specific to the grant – Adoption, Foster Care, Child Care Block Grant, Social
Services Block Grant and TANF receive allocations specific to their grants. These
allocations are based on mandated methodology guidelines, including demographics,
expenditure information pulled from CFIS, etc. There are no local requirements for the
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 13 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
calculating or receiving of these allocations. The County receives notification of their
grant allocation from ODJFS via the CFIS web system.

Social Services Block grant receives a Title XX Federal social services allocation (OAC
5101:9-6-12).

ODJFS issues initial pass-through allocations based on the greater of:
a. The average expenditures of the last two years reported expenditures: or
b. The total of the last four completed quarters’ reported expenditures.
An agency with no reported expenditures over either time period will receive a minimum
budget (5101:9-6-44). An agency may request an increase at any time during the fiscal
year. Counties receive notification of their allocation via CFIS Web. The CDJFS receives
funding for the following pass throughs: food assistance (FA), food and nutrition services
(FNS), Medicaid and SCHIP.
3. Income Maintenance (State Allocation) – not applicable for Social Services Block Grant.
4. Program Specific State Allocations.

In addition to their County JFS allocations, there are two opportunities for County JFS to release or
receive monies: 1) They can swap funds with other counties, (this process must be approved by
evidence of County Commissioners sign off) which goes through ODJFS to change the allocations in
CFIS; or 2) In December or January they can apply for additional funds or to free up monies allocated to
other grants. In this case, the County JFS must indicate need and ODJFS may provide additional funds
as made available by other counties; however, the statewide allocation does not change. ODJFS
changes the allocation in the CFIS system. While this does not require testing at the local level, auditors
should be aware this may be the reason any such re-allocations in the system. Note: The Ohio
Department of Job and Family Services developed a process to allow for specific allocated funds to be
exchanged between counties. The process is detailed in rule 5101:9-6-82 of the Administrative Code.
See the ICAA section of the BCFTA Tools website for details of the process at
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/Allocations.stm .

For most grants, the County JFS can draw down funds on a weekly basis from the ODJFS (see Reporting
L section of this document). Public Children Services Agency (PCSA) grants (Adoption Assistance and
Foster Care) are reimbursement grants. There may be portions of a program that are on a
reimbursement basis (none known for SSBG) however, the remainder of the programs the County JFS
agency draws down an advance of funds for anticipated needs and monthly report expenditures.
Quarterly adjustments are made for the differences.

County JFS file quarterly reports with ODJFS via CFIS. There is a quarterly reconciliation process
performed by ODJFS. See also OAC 5101:9-7-03 and 5101:9-7-03.1 for additional information on the
financing, reconciliation and closeout procedures. Auditors should review these sections for specific
details on this process. See also Reporting Section L.

The reconciliation process was communicated to CDJFS in FAPMTL 258 effective 10/9/12 (see
http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/lpc/calendar/fileLINKNAME.asp?ID=FAPMTL258) OAC 5101:9-7-03.1)
The CDJFS has access to system reporting throughout the quarter in order to make ongoing
adjustments/corrections. County JFS enters expenditures monthly into CFIS Web and submit to OAKS
quarterly. They file quarterly the certification of monthly expenditure reports with ODJFS. The CDJFS is
given five business days after the eighteenth day of the month following the last month of the quarter to
review reports for accuracy. No later than five business days after the eighteenth day of the month
following the last month of the quarter, the CDJFS shall submit any final adjustments and/or revisions to
OAKS. Once the five-day review period is complete, ODJFS suspends reporting access to OAKS for the
closing quarter in order to begin the quarter reconciliation process. The CDJFS shall make any allowable
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 14 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
changes that arise after the five-day review period to open grants in the current quarter. The Ohio
department of job and family services (ODJFS) notifies the CDJFS when the quarter reconciliation
process is completed. The CDJFS shall review reports for accuracy and immediately notify ODJFS of any
discrepancies. ODJFS reconciles refunds and collections at the end of each quarter. ODJFS reconciles
state funded allocations and federally funded subgrants at the end of their period of availability. The
period of availability includes the funding period and the liquidation period.

The CFIS Web system does not link information into the county auditor’s expenditure ledgers. Counties
can manually reenter the information or they may use a computer program for this upload process.
Auditors should check to see if the information uploads to the County Auditor’s system accurately by
reconciling Form 2827 (C/R 520 in CFIS Web) to the County Auditor’s & JFS records (see Reporting L
section of this document). Beginning in 2015 ODJFS made available to its subrecipients, a PET
replacement system called the CFIS Web Ledger Reporting (LR) system. PET was a Maximus system
where the county could enter receipt and expenditure transactions and then that information would upload
automatically in CFIS. Maximus discontinued PET in 2014. The LR system is integrated with CFIS web
and reduces the risk of error in manually reentering information from the county ledger into CFIS. Based
on our review of the LR system and entities using it for 2015, we determined it was not widely adopted for
2015 and it was not added to the list of systems to be tested by ISA. If auditors determine that the county
they are auditing is using the LR system for 2016 that information should be communicated to the CFAE
so that a determination can be made if the LR system should be added to the 2016 ISA testing.

See BCFTA Update 2014-14 regarding costs associated with county lay-off of staff at
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/BB/BCFTAUpdate_2014-14_SFY15_CountyLayoff.stm

See also FAPL No. 34, Abnormal or Mass Severance Pay at
http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/lpc/calendar/fileLINKNAME.asp?ID=FAPL34
ODJFS Program Information (Source: ODJFS website – 10/1/13-9/30/14 Comprehensive Title XX Plan)
The OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES is the state agency under Ohio law responsible for
the administration of the Title XX Social Services program. The department has the authority to plan, develop
programs, and make rules and regulations pertaining to social services. The purpose of the program is to provide
social services directed to enable residents of Ohio to restore, maintain or improve their capabilities for selfsupport, self-care, independent living and for strengthening family life.
Those services which each county elects to offer locally shall be directed to one or more of the following goals: (I)
achieving or maintaining economic self-support to prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency; (II) achieving or
maintaining self-sufficiency, including reduction or prevention of dependency; (III) preventing or remedying
neglect, abuse, or exploitation of children and adults unable to protect their own interests or preserving,
rehabilitating, reuniting families; (IV) preventing or reducing inappropriate institutional care by providing for
community-based care, home based care, or other forms of less intensive care; and (V) securing referral or
admission for institutional care when other forms of care are not appropriate or providing services to individuals in
institutions.
(2.) Program Funding
Seethe ODJFS prepared CSEA, PA, PCSA and WIA Federal grant templates at
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/tools1.stm. Copies of these are also maintained for AOS staff on the
internal AOS Federal ODJFS Resources intranet page.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 15 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
(3.) AOS Testing Considerations
Since each County could conceivably have a different plan with varying eligibility requirements, services
offered, etc., there is no effective way to incorporate testing for all Counties in this FACCR. In addition,
Counties can amend their plan at will be amended at will. Auditors will need to tailor this FACCR in
accordance to the plan(s) in effect during their audit.
Auditors should evaluate cost pools and reporting requirements that are consistent between ODJFS grant
programs and only test these once rather than with each grant program. The following table shows
where some efficiencies can be gained for common cost pools (FACCR Section A) and reports (FACCR
Section L):
Reported on:
Program:
County Fund Paid from:
RMS Cost Pool
JFS 02827
Medicaid, CHIP, Food
Assistance, TANF, SSBG,
CCBG
Public Assistance (PA)
Fund
IMRMS / SSRMS
JFS 02750
Child Support
Enforcement
Child Support
Administrative Fund
CSRMS
JFS 02820
Foster Care & Adoption
Children Services Workers
CWRMS or SSRMS (if
combined agency)
In addition, as noted in Section E, in some cases, the county may choose to supplement other program activities
with funding from this program. If that is the case, eligibility testing may be done in conjunction with the other
program(s).
For an overview of requirements tested by program: see AOS spreadsheet, ODJFS list of program &
applicable requirements. These reports are in CFIS Web, and are designated as CR520 reports.
Additionally the old report numbers (2827, 2750 or 2820) will be listed at the bottom of the CR520.
(4.) Reporting in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
The County federal schedule will report administrative and other expenditures (whether charged directly
to the program or allocated through a cost allocation plan or cost pool) paid by the County.
For guidance on ODJFS grants reported on counties SEFA’s, auditors should refer to the ODJFS
prepared CSEA, PA, PCSA and WIA Federal grant templates at
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/tools1.stm. Copies of these are also maintained for AOS staff on the
internal AOS Federal ODJFS Resources intranet page. While the CR 504 CFDA report is a good starting
point for counties to determine the expenditures to be reported on the SFAE, there are some programs or
parts of program that are not reflected in either of these report. The spreadsheet provides program
specific information for testing the SFAE.
Per ODJFS, all grants are reported on a cash basis and should be presented likewise on the SFAE.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 16 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information
To ensure expenditures are reported accurately by CFDA#, auditors should also determine how multi-agency
contract expenditures are recorded on the schedule of federal awards expenditures.
The local government should report federal expenditures for CFDA #93.667. A-133.310(b) (2) requires including
pass-through numbers (if any) on the Schedule. Counties should report the subgrant agreement number (i.e. G1011-11-5006) as the pass through number and roll the grants up in total by CFDA. Please note there may be
two subgrant agreements in place for the calendar year. If that is the case then report both numbers (i.e. G-101111-5006 / G-1011-11-5007).
Grant Title
SSBG
CFDA number
#93.667
Pass through number
G-1011-11-5006 / G-1011-115007
Expenditures
$XXX,XXX
(5.) Information systems, including a description on how they operate (i.e.
CRIS-E, CFIS Web, CFIS Web LR)
Computer Systems
The following State-level systems are utilized by Counties for these programs:

CRIS-E - Used primarily to determine eligibility and benefit amounts for Food Assistance, TANF, SCHIP,
and Medicaid; and generates the voucher summary detail for these programs. It also maintains data
entered by the case workers related to the recipients and their cases.

CFIS – (County Finance Information System) July 1, 2009 County JFS finance offices began using CFIS,
which drives the financial reporting (Forms 2827, 2750, and 2820, RMS activity, etc.). The current and
archived CFIS information can be accessed at the County JFS site. At the county level, financial data is
imported (pulled) from templates or from interfaced systems like WebRMS into the CFIS Web reporting
system. Information flows from the county system through CFIS and up to OAKS. Each grant is coded
separately. ODJFS has a spreadsheet for coding in CFIS. ODJFS updates this information each year.
ISA will be testing CFIS Web (including the RMS System used to track Random Moment Sampling
activity and allocation of program expenditure. A recap of that work performed and any user control
considerations will be sent out when available for 2014.
The OAKS general controls portion tested as part of the Statewide SSAE 16 SOC 1, however, will
continue to be on a state fiscal year (6/30).

County JFS fiscal offices use CFIS Web to record their expenditures. However, this system does not link
the information into the county auditor’s expenditure ledgers. The counties can manually reenter the
information or they may use a computer program for this upload process. The State Region does not
look at these type of programs. In 2015 ODJFS made available to its subrecipients, a PET replacement
system called the CFIS Web Ledger Reporting (LR) system. PET was a Maximus system where the
county could enter receipt and expenditure transactions and then that information would upload
automatically in CFIS. Maximus discontinued PET in 2014. The LR system is integrated with CFIS web
and reduces the risk of error in manually reentering information from the county ledger into CFIS. Based
on our review of the LR system and entities using it for 2015, we determined it was not widely adopted
for 2015 and it was not added to the list of systems to be tested by ISA, additionally the State Region
does not review this program. Auditors will need to test the information in the LR system (or similar
system) to the amounts recorded in the County Auditor’s records for accuracy.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 17 of 92
SSBG Part II
ODJFS Specific Information

With the implementation of CFIS Web, ODJFS has developed a new process to replace the function of
the Configuration File. The new process is called “Adjustment to a Prior Period Allocated and Approved
Expenditure” or APAA. Agencies will utilize this process in instances where an adjustment needs to
occur and direct coding is not available (i.e. audit, ERIP, and errors). This process can be initiated by the
local agency or by ODJFS and is recorded on form JFS 01179. See BCFTA updated 2013-17 dated
2/28/13 for further information http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/BB/20130228-BCFTA-Update-2013-17APAA.stm .
NOTE: ODJFS is not granting auditors of County JFS programs access to the JFS systems. ODJFS is
encouraging County JFS offices to cooperate with audit requests. Per Office of Fiscal and Monitoring
Services’ County Monitoring Advisory Bulletin 2012-01 / Workforce Investment Act Advisory Bulletin
2012-01, dated February 13, 2012, in part:
“County agency management personnel are obligated to provide the necessary data to the
regional auditors or their designees. However, due care must be taken to safeguard the
information provided to the AOS and its contractors. Under no circumstances should agency
management or staff give the AOS audit staff access to any ODJFS systems. Each agency must
make a reasonable effort to limit the disclosure of protected health information to the minimum
necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the disclosure. The agencies must provide the
data to the AOS via encrypted media, i.e. memory sticks, CDs or DVDs, external hard drives etc.,
in accordance with state guidelines on secure portable media.
The method through which data are transferred is at the sole discretion of each local director.”
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 18 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
OMB Compliance Requirements
Part III – Applicable Compliance Requirements
A. Activities Allowed and Unallowed
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each Federal program and are found in
the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. This type of
compliance requirement specifies the activities that can or cannot be funded under a specific program.
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation, Federal awarding
agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award.
Important Note: For a cost to be allowable, it must (1) be for a purpose the specific award permits and (2) fall
within 2 CFR 225’s allowable cost guidelines. These two criteria are roughly analogous to classifying a cost by
both program/function and object. That is, the grant award generally prescribes the allowable program/function
while 2 CFR 225 prescribes allowable object cost categories and restrictions that may apply to certain object
codes of expenditures.
For example, could a government use an imaginary Homeland Security grant to pay OP&F pension costs for its
police force? To determine this, the client (and we) would look to the grant agreement to see if police activities
(security of persons and property function cost classification) met the program objectives. Then, the auditor
would look to 2 CFR 225 to determine if pension costs (an object cost classification) are permissible. (2 CFR 225,
Appendix B states they are allowable, with restrictions, so we would need to determine if the auditee met the
restrictions.) Both the client and we should look at 2 CFR 225 even if the grant agreement includes a budget by
object code approved by the grantor agency.
OMB Specific Information (Source: Section IV of the Supplement)
1. Services provided with SSBG funds may include, but are not limited to, child care services, protective
services for children and adults, services for children and adults in foster care, services related to the
management and maintenance of the home, day care services for adults, transportation services, family
planning services, training and related services, employment services, information, referral, counseling
services, the preparation and delivery of meals, health support services, and appropriate combinations of
services designed to meet the special needs of children, the aged, the mentally retarded, the blind, the
emotionally disturbed, the physically handicapped, and alcoholics and drug addicts (42 USC 1397a(a)).
Uniform definitions for these services are included in Appendix A to 45 CFR part 96 - Uniform Definitions
of Services.
Expenditures for these services may include expenditures for administration, including planning and
evaluation, personnel training and retraining directly related to the provision of those services (including
both short- and long-term training at educational institutions), and conferences and workshops, and
assistance to individuals participating in such activities (42 USC 1397a(a)).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 19 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
OMB Compliance Requirements
2. A State may purchase technical assistance from public or private entities if the State determines that such
assistance is required in developing, implementing, or administering the SSBG program (42 USC
1397a(e)).
3. A State may transfer up to 10 percent of its annual allotment to the following block grants for support of
health services, health promotion and disease prevention activities, low-income home energy assistance,
or any combination of these activities: Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant (CFDA
93.991); Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (CFDA 93.959); Maternal and
Child Health Services Block Grant to the States (CFDA 93.994); Low-Income Home Energy Assistance
(CFDA 93.568); and Community Services Block Grant (93.569) (42 USC 1397a(d); 45 CFR section
96.72).
4. Funds may not be used for:
a. Except as provided in III.A.4, above, purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase,
construction, or permanent improvement (other than minor remodeling) of any facility (unless the
restriction is waived by ACF) (42 USC 1397(d)(a)(1)).
b. Cash payments for costs of subsistence or for the provision of room and board (other than costs
of subsistence during rehabilitation, room and board provided for a short term as an integral but
subordinate part of a social service, or temporary shelter provided as a protective service) (42
USC 1397(d)(a)(2)).
c. Wages of any individual as a social service (other than payment of wages of Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (CFDA 93.558) recipients employed in the provision of
child day care services) (42 USC 1397(d)(a)(3)).
d. Medical care (other than family planning services, rehabilitation services, or initial detoxification of
an alcoholic or drug-dependent individual) unless it is an integral but subordinate part of an
allowable social service under SSBG (unless the restriction is waived by ACF) (42 USC 1397(d)
(a) (4)).
e. Social services (except services to an alcoholic or drug-dependent individual or rehabilitation
services) provided in and by employees of any hospital, skilled nursing facility, intermediate care
facility, or prison, to any individual living in such institution (42 USC 1397(d)(a)(5)).
f. The provision of any educational service that the State makes generally available to its residents
without cost and without regard to their income (42 USC 1397(d) (a) (6)).
g. Any child day care services unless such services meet applicable standards of State and local
law (42 USC 1397(d) (a) (7)).
h. The provision of cash payments as a service (this limitation does not apply to payments to
individuals with respect to training or attendance at conferences or workshops) (42 USC 1397(d)
(a) (8)).
i. Any item or service (other than an emergency item of service) furnished by an entity, physician,
or other individual during the period of exclusion from reimbursement by various provisions of
Federal regulations (42 USC 1397(d) (a) (9)).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 20 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
RMS
The following transmittal letters communicate the most recent changes to the OAC rules concerning the webbased RMS system:

OAC 5101:9-7-23 Child Support Random Moment Sample (RMS) Time Study
o See FAPMTL No. 229 (eff 12/29/11) at
http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/lpc/calendar/fileLINKNAME.asp?ID=FAPMTL229

OAC 5101:9-7-20 Income Maintenance, Workforce, Social Services, and Child Welfare Random Moment
Sample (RMS) Time Studies
o See FAPMTL No. 318 (eff 4-12-15) at
http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/lpc/calendar/fileLINKNAME.asp?ID=FAPMTL318
o Effective 4/12/2015, the OAC 5101:9-7-20 (m) was amended to include requirements of 45 CFR
75.420 and 45 CFR 75.430. These are the HHS codifications of the UG sections 2 CFR 200.420
and .430 which replace guidance previously held in 2 CFR 225 appendix B cost allocation
methods. The change indicates that CFSA’s and WDA shall allocate costs in accordance with
the new rule, only unless ODJFS has approved an alternate cost allocation method. Although the
effective date is within the 2015 audit period, 2 CFR 225 appendix B is considered to be the
governing federal rule for any non-UG transactions, which will cover awards earlier than the FY
2016 awards that begin October 1, 2015. Therefore, any exceptions for non-UG awards (FFY 14
and 15 awards) will cite 2 CFR 225 Appendix B.
See also BCFTA Web WebRMS reports at http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/Regional-Quarterly-Meeting/JulSept-2011/WebRMS_ReportList.pdf also http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/RMS/RMSTADocument.pdf and the
desk guide at http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/RMS/RMSDeskGuide.pdf . The Web RMS user manual was
updated December 2013 and is available here http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/RMS/RMS_UserManual.stm
The RMS observations are time studies, which are designed to measure county staff activity regarding income
maintenance and social services programs. Both the Income Maintenance RMS (IMRMS) and the Social
Services RMS (SSRMS) are completed on a quarterly basis by all positions performing directly related program
functions, with the exception of positions performing administrative support or supervisory functions unless the
person actually provides direct services. The RMS system selects the staff sample for completing the RMS from
the staff rosters (FTE reporting) submitted by the county RMS coordinators and determines the sampling times.
Data collected from these time studies are used to calculate the percentage of time spent on the program. The
percentages are used by the County agency system to allocate expenditures reported on the ODHS 2827 /
CR520 financial statements.
County expenditures primarily consist of administrative expenses, most of which are captured through the RMS
process discussed above; however, there may be non-RMS related expenditures as noted above performing
administrative support or supervisory functions only, such as the JFS Director, human resource employees, etc.
These are the administrative staff whose expenses belong in the shared cost pool. If it can be determined that a
supervisor only supervises staff in one program- type cost pool, that supervisor’s expenses are included in the
program-type cost pool and allocated along with their staff’s expenses by the RMS statistics for that particular
program type.
RMS based funding has a one month lag time. For example, RMS reporting for September, October and
November drives the quarterly funding for October, November and December.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 21 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
RMS sample sizes required per OAC:
RMS Type
Agency Size
# of Observations
Income Maintenance (IMRMS)
Metro
Minimum of 2,300
Income Maintenance (IMRMS)
Suburban & Rural
Minimum of 354
Social Services (SSRMS), Child
Welfare (CWRMS), Juvenile Ct
1-10 Participating Positions
Minimum of 33 per
worker
Social Services (SSRMS), Child
Welfare (CWRMS), Juvenile Ct
11-74 Participating Positions
Minimum of 354
Social Services (SSRMS), Child
Welfare (CWRMS), Juvenile Ct
75 or more Participating Positions
Minimum of 2,400
Child Support (CSRMS)
Minimum of 354
AOS Additional Testing Considerations
Sections A & B are most often tested using them same sample. Additional program specific requirements /
testing considerations are included in Section A that would also affect Section B.
County testing will primarily consist of the following:



Administrative expenses
FTE/RMS/Cost pools
Direct expenditures
Auditors will need to test pooled costs separately (RMS) from direct charges (County ledgers).
All salaries and indirect expenses are included in cost pools. There are two levels of allocation for County JFS
expenditures. Costs benefiting all programs (rent, leases, utilities, supplies, indirect employee costs for positions
such as the agency director, personnel, fiscal, related compensation, etc.) are included in the Shared Costs Pool
and are allocated based on the Quarterly Report of County JFS Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Positions submitted to
ODJFS. Shared costs are distributed in CFIS Web based on the IM, SS, and CSEA FTE percentages.
More information regarding FTE reporting is available at http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/TOOLS.stm. FTE
reporting was previously accomplished on Form 4290, which has been replaced by CFIS Web form CR 445.
Allowable costs on FTE Report associated with Employees
Reported on:
Program:
County Fund Paid from:
RMS Cost Pool
JFS 02827
Medicaid, CHIP, Food
Assistance, TANF, SSBG,
CCBG
Public Assistance (PA)
Fund
IMRMS / SSRMS
JFS 02750
Child Support
Enforcement
Child Support
Administrative Fund
CSRMS
JFS 02820
Foster Care & Adoption
Children Services
Workers
CWRMS or SSRMS (if
combined agency)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 22 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
These electronic reports in CFIS Web are titled CR520 reports, they will however, still be designated at the
bottom as 2827, 2750 or 2820.
Costs are then allocated to the program level based on the RMS studies.
Auditors will need to test both FTE reporting and RMS.
Auditors can determine population for RMS testing from a summary report for the quarter on CFIS that uploads
into the RMS system. There is a data file with this information in CFIS that can be downloaded at the County JFS
site.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 23 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
the 2013 COSO (http://www.coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf), perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program. Plan the
testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance requirement
and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of the
compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
2. Determine whether Federal awards were expended only for allowable activities.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Here are some questions that can help in documenting the above control requirements
(Note: The ODJFS Guided Self-Assessment (GSA) or County/District JFS Policies should document
controls for meeting compliance requirements. Auditors should review the information provided by the
County/District JFS to gain an understanding of the procedures in place.)
1. Does the County/district JFS pay expenditures to the County/fiscal agent via a CAP?
2. How does the County/district ensure only applicable costs are included in the CAP?
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 24 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
3. What procedures does the County/district JFS have in place to ensure they are only paying for allowable
activities?
4. What controls does the County/district JFS have to ensure costs are not paid through the CAP and
directly to the County/fiscal agent?
5. What procedures does the County/district JFS have in place for only allowable costs input into CFIS?
6. What procedures does the County/district JFS have to ensure administrative employees / costs are not
reported as part of RMS, unless these employees provide direct services?
7. How does the County/district ensure that:






Employees are properly completing the RMS observation;
Documentation is available to support the program and activity claimed;
Observations for absent employees are properly completed;
FTE allocations for the shared cost pool are correct;
Employees are assigned to the correct cost pool; and
Employees are completing the correct RMS observation.
8. Interview the RMS Coordinator. Document RMS coordinator name and date of interview. Document any
weaknesses noted. Interview could include questions such as the following:
a. Are you familiar with the RMS procedures summarized in the Administrative Procedures Manual?
b. What is your role in the RMS process?
c. What do you do if you receive an RMS observation for an employee who no longer works in your
office?
d. How do you ensure the observation are filled out correctly?
e. Have you received any special training or instructions on RMS procedures within the past 12 months?
f. How do you complete the RMS control sample? What is the purpose of the control sample?
9. Interview case workers who participate in RMS. Document employee name and date of interview.
Interview could include questions such as the following:
i.
Are you familiar with the RMS procedures summarized in the Administrative Procedures Manual?
ii.
What do you do when you receive an observation?
1. Complete immediately
2. Hold until appropriate time
3. Complete at my convenience
4. Other (explain)
iii.
What items need to be completed for the observation?
1. What program you are working with
2. Activity code
3. Case number (or unique identifier)
4. Comment section completed
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 25 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):

Auditors should gain efficiencies by testing in conjunction with other programs with the same
requirements for CAP, FTE and RMS

For instances where the compliance affects multiple major programs (i.e. RMS, FTE, financial
reporting) we can sometimes have one population for determining sample size. See AICPA Single
Audit Guide 21.42.

Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use
this as the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be
selected) of substantive tests of compliance.
Direct Costs
1) Identify (and document) the types of activities which are either specifically allowed or prohibited by the laws,
regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program.
2) When allowability is determined based upon summary level data (voucher summaries, etc.), perform
procedures to verify that:
a) Activities were allowable.
b) Individual transactions were properly classified and accumulated into the activity total.
3) When allowability is determined based upon individual transactions, select a representative number of
transactions and perform procedures (vouch, scan, etc.) to verify that the transaction was for an allowable
activity.
4) The auditor should be alert for large transfers of funds from program accounts, which may have been used to
fund unallowable activities.
5) If the client has made subawards under the program, select a representative number of awards and
determine whether they were only approved for activities as identified in step 1 above. See also Section M.
6) Obtain management’s explanation for any significant questionable expenditures/subawards. Analyze
responses and obtain any additional documentation considered necessary.
7) In conjunction with Allowable Costs/Cost Principles in Section B, determine if the disbursements met OMB
Circular A-87 (2 CFR 225) requirements.
Other Attributes:
-- Charges were properly coded.
-- Voucher was properly computed.
-- Invoice amount agrees to voucher amount
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 27 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
----
Invoice date precedes voucher date.
If a reimbursement, reimbursement was not claimed greater than 21 months following the
payment of the expenditure.
Payment was made to or on behalf of an eligible recipient, as defined in the
eligibility requirements
CAP (see also CAP testing in Section B)
1) Summarize monthly payments to the County/district and review CAP for accuracy of payment. Ensure that
payments made were for the current or prior period and they were within the current biennium.
2) Review CAP for reasonableness of County/district JFS expenditures.
FTE Reporting- the roster is uploaded through the WebRMS system (See OAC 5101:9-7-23 & 5101:9-7-20.
For additional information.)
1. Determine if the number of FTE by program area category is consistent with the payroll in the previous
quarter.
2. Pull a representative sample of employees and determine if they are reported in the correct program area
category based on documentation. (i.e. job duties, job description, personnel file, employee interview, etc.)
RMS
1. Determine RMS cost pools that require testing (i.e. Income Maintenance, Social Services, Child Support, and
Child Welfare).
2. Scan all 4 quarterly RMS Tabulation Reports to identify any indications of misuse or manipulation of RMS
codes (could help determine which quarter to test in step 3):
a. High instances of un-funded codes
b. Large variances (over 20%) in RMS coding between quarters
c. Distribution of RMS codes between programs
3. Obtain one quarter’s RMS observations for each population to be tested (i.e. Shared, Income Maintenance,
Social Services, Child Support, Child Welfare)
Select a representative sample of observations, test for the following attributes and note any exceptions.
i.
Observation includes a case number or other identifier or is marked 001
ii.
Observation includes the activity, where applicable
iii.
Determine if documentation exists to substantiate the claimed program and/or activity on the
RMS sample observation
iv.
Employee must respond to the observation within 24 business hours.
v.
The RMS Coordinator reviewed and approved all observation moment responses within 48
hours. If the observation had been flagged as part of the quality assurance control group,
determine the supervisor/supervisor designee validated the response within the same twentySSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 28 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
vi.
four-hour response period that is available to the employee. Also, determine if it was
approved by the supervisor/supervisor designee, and that the response was accepted by the
RMS coordinator.
No unauthorized or vacant positions were included in the RMS sample
4. From the RMS sample in Step 3, select a sample of employees (no duplicates) and determine if RMS charge
is supported
a. Obtain payroll listing with job titles and compare to RMS observations completed
b. Review job duties from observation and / or interview with employee
c. Match job activities from RMS with job descriptions in personnel file
d. If employee is an administrative or supervisory, determine whether they are appropriately completing
the RMS observations
i.
Administrative support employees can participate in RMS if they provide direct services 50%
of the time
ii.
Supervisory employees can participate in RMS if they provide direct services over 50% of the
time
5. The information that was previously included in the County/district RMS Sample Reference list (the list was a
recap from ODJFS of the RMS observation information input into the system by the County/district JFS) is
available in the WebRMS system.
 Determine if the required number of observations were performed
Reminder: Auditors should not put confidential information in the current working papers and should
follow established procedures for protection of confidential information.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 29 of 92
Part III
A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implication Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 30 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
As discussed in Appendix I to the Supplement, Federal Programs Excluded from the A-102 Common Rule and
Portions of 2 CFR Part 200, SSBG is exempt from the provisions of the OMB cost principles circulars. State cost
principles requirements apply to SSBG.
As noted, in Part II of the Introduction, the OMB Compliance Supplement indicates this program is not
subject to Circulars A102 or A87, however, ODJFS requires the Counties to use State cost principles,
which require the counties to follow Circulars A102 and A87.
Applicability of OMB Cost Principles Circular
The following OMB cost principle circular prescribes the cost accounting policies associated with the
administration of Federal awards by States, local governments, and Indian tribal governments (State rules for
expenditures of State funds apply for block grants authorized by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981
and for other programs specified in Appendix I). Federal awards administered by publicly-owned hospitals and
other providers of medical care are exempt from OMB's cost principles circulars, but are subject to requirements
promulgated by the sponsoring Federal agencies (e.g., the Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR,
part 74, Appendix E). The cost principles applicable to a non-Federal entity apply to all Federal awards received
by the entity, regardless of whether the awards are received directly from the Federal Government or indirectly
through a pass-through entity. The circular describes selected cost items, allowable and unallowable costs, and
standard methodologies for calculating indirect costs rates (e.g., methodologies used to recover facilities and
administrative costs (F&A) at institutions of higher education). Federal awards include Federal programs and costtype contracts and may be in the form of grants, contracts, and other agreements.
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for allowable costs/cost principles are contained in the A-102 Common Rule (§___.22) (45 CFR
part 92), program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award.
The applicable cost principle circular is:

OMB Circular A-87, 'Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments' (2 CFR part
225).
Although this cost principle circular has been reissued in Title 2 of the CFR for ease of access, the OMB Circular
A-133 Compliance Supplement refers to it by the circular title and numbering. However, auditors should use the
authoritative reference of 2 CFR Part 225 when citing noncompliance.
Note: This FACCR is designed for County Governments (based on the requirements of OMB Circular A87). It is not intended for use when performing a Single Audit for a Higher Educational Institution or a
Non-Profit Organization.
Important Note: For a cost to be allowable, it must (1) be for a purpose the specific award permits and (2) fall
within A-87’s (codified in 2 CFR Part 225) allowable cost guidelines. These two criteria are roughly analogous to
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 31 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
classifying a cost by both program/function and object. That is, the grant award generally prescribes the
allowable program/function while 2 CFR Part 225 prescribes allowable object cost categories and restrictions that
may apply to certain object codes of expenditures.
For example, could a government use an imaginary Homeland Security grant to pay OP&F pension costs for its
police force? To determine this, the client (and we) would look to the grant agreement to see if police activities
(security of persons and property function cost classification) met the program objectives. Then, the auditor
would look to 2 CFR Part 225 to determine if pension costs (an object cost classification) are permissible. (2 CFR
Part 225, Appendix B states they are allowable, with restrictions, so we would need to determine if the auditee
met the restrictions.) Both the client and we should look at 2 CFR Part 225 even if the grant agreement includes
a budget by object code approved by the grantor agency.
Exhibit 1 of Part 3 of the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement, Selected Items of Cost (included in at the
end of Part B to this FACCR, lists the treatment of the selected costs items in the circular.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 32 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
OMB Circular A-87 Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments
Introduction
OMB Circular A-87 (A-87) establishes principles and standards for determining allowable direct and indirect costs
for Federal awards. This section is organized into the following areas of allowable costs: State/Local-Wide Central
Service Costs; State/Local Department or Agency Costs (Direct and Indirect); and State Public Assistance
Agency Costs. States also are subject to the cost allocation provisions and rules governing allowable costs of
equipment of 45 CFR part 95, which references OMB Circular A-87 at 45 CFR section 95.507(a)(2) (45 CFR
sections 1355.57, 95.503, and 95.705).
Cognizant Agency
A-87, Attachment A, paragraph B.6. defines 'cognizant agency' as the Federal agency responsible for reviewing,
negotiating, and approving cost allocation plans or indirect cost proposals developed under A-87 on behalf of all
Federal agencies. OMB publishes a listing of cognizant agencies (Federal Register, 51 FR 552, January 6, 1986).
This listing is available at
at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/financial_pdf/fr-notice_cost_negotiation_010686.pdf .
References to cognizant agency in this section should not be confused with the cognizant Federal agency for
audit responsibilities, which is defined in OMB Circular A-133, Subpart D. §____.400(a).
Availability of Other Information
Additional information on cost allocation plans and indirect cost rates is found in the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) publications: A Guide for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments (ASMB C-10);
Review Guide for State and Local Governments State/Local-Wide Central Service Cost Allocation Plans and
Indirect Cost Rates; and the DCA Best Practices Manual for Reviewing Public Assistance Cost Allocation Plans
which are available https://rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/pa.html.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 33 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
Most governmental entities provide services, such as accounting, purchasing, computer services, and fringe
benefits, to operating agencies on a centralized basis. Since the Federal awards are performed within the
individual operating agencies, there must be a process whereby these central service costs are identified and
assigned to benefiting operating agency activities on a reasonable and consistent basis. The State/local-wide
central service cost allocation plan (CAP) provides that process. (Refer to A-87, Attachment C, State/Local-Wide
Central Service Cost Allocation Plans, for additional information and specific requirements.)
The allowable costs of central services that a governmental unit provides to its agencies may be allocated or
billed to the user agencies. The State/local-wide central service CAP is the required documentation of the
methods used by the governmental unit to identify and accumulate these costs, and to allocate them or develop
billing rates based on them.
Allocated central service costs (referred to as Section I costs) are allocated to benefiting operating agencies on
some reasonable basis. These costs are usually negotiated and approved for a future year on a 'fixed-with-carryforward' basis. Examples of such services might include general accounting, personnel administration, and
purchasing. Section I costs assigned to an operating agency through the State/local-wide central service CAP are
typically included in the agency's indirect cost pool.
Billed central service costs (referred to as Section II costs) are billed to benefiting agencies and/or programs on
an individual fee-for-service or similar basis. The billed rates are usually based on the estimated costs for
providing the services. An adjustment will be made at least annually for the difference between the revenue
generated by each billed service and the actual allowable costs. Examples of such billed services include
computer services, transportation services, self- insurance, and fringe benefits. Section II costs billed to an
operating agency may be charged as direct costs to the agency's Federal awards or included in its indirect cost
pool.
Compliance Requirements - State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
1. Basic Guidelines
a. The basic guidelines affecting allowability of costs (direct and indirect) are identified in A-87,
Attachment A, paragraph C.
b. To be allowable under Federal awards, costs must meet the following general criteria (A-87,
Attachment A, paragraph C.1):
1. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance and administration of Federal awards.
(Refer to A-87, Attachment A, paragraph C.2 for additional information on
reasonableness of costs.)
2. Be allocable to Federal awards under the provisions of A-87. (Refer to A-87, Attachment
A, paragraph C.3 for additional information on allocable costs.)
3. Be authorized or not prohibited under State or local laws or regulations.
4. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in A-87, Federal laws, terms and
conditions of the Federal award, or other governing regulations as to types or amounts of
cost items.
5. Be consistent with policies, regulations, and procedures that apply uniformly to both
Federal awards and other activities of the governmental unit.
6. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a
direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been
allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 34 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
7. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, except as
otherwise provided in A-87.
8. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any
other Federal award, except as specifically provided by Federal law or regulation.
9. Be net of all applicable credits. (Refer to A-87, Attachment A, paragraph C.4 for
additional information on applicable credits.)
10. Be adequately documented.
Selected Items of Cost
a. Sections 1 through 43 of A-87, Attachment B, provide the principles to be applied in establishing
the allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost. (For a listing of costs, refer to Exhibit 1 of
this part of the Supplement.) These principles apply whether a cost is treated as direct or indirect.
Failure to mention a particular item of cost in this section of A-87 is not intended to imply that it is
either allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability in each case should be based
on the treatment or standards provided for similar or related items of cost.
b. A cost is allowable for Federal reimbursement only to the extent of benefits received by Federal
awards and its conformance with the general policies and principles stated in A-87, Attachment A.
Submission Requirements
a. Submission requirements are identified in A-87, Attachment C, paragraph D.
b. A State is required to submit a State-wide central service CAP to HHS for each year in which it
claims central service costs under Federal awards.
c. A local government that has been designated as a 'major local government' by OMB is required
to submit a central service CAP to its cognizant agency annually. This listing is posted on the
OMB website (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/management). All other local governments
claiming central service costs must develop a CAP in accordance with the requirements
described in A-87 and maintain the plan and related supporting documentation for audit. Local
governments are not required to submit the plan for Federal approval unless they are specifically
requested to do so by the cognizant agency. If a local government receives funds as a
subrecipient only, the primary recipient will be responsible for negotiating and/or monitoring the
local government's plan.
d. All central service CAPs will be prepared and, when required, submitted within the 6 months prior
to the beginning of the governmental unit's fiscal years in which it proposes to claim central
service costs. Extensions may be granted by the cognizant agency.
Documentation Requirements
a. The central service CAP must include all central service costs that will be claimed (either as an
allocated or a billed cost) under Federal awards. Costs of central services omitted from the CAP
will not be reimbursed.
b. The documentation requirements for all central service CAPs are contained in A-87, Attachment
C, paragraph E. All plans and related documentation used as a basis for claiming costs under
Federal awards must be retained for audit in accordance with the record retention requirements
contained in the A-102 Common Rule (45 CFR part 92).
Required Certification - No proposal to establish a central service CAP, whether submitted to a Federal
cognizant agency or maintained on file by the governmental unit, shall be accepted and approved unless
such costs have been certified by the governmental unit using the Certificate of Cost Allocation Plan as
set forth in A-87, Attachment C.
Allocated Central Service Costs (Section I Costs) - A carry-forward adjustment is not permitted for a
central service activity that was not included in the previously approved plan or for unallowable costs that
must be reimbursed immediately (A-87, Attachment C, paragraph G.3).
Billed Central Service Costs (Section II Costs)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 35 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
a. Internal service funds for central service activities are allowed a working capital reserve of up to
60 days cash expenses for normal operating purposes (A-87, Attachment C, paragraph G.2). A
working capital reserve exceeding 60 days may be approved by the cognizant Federal agency in
exceptional cases.
b. Adjustments of billed central services are required when there is a difference between the
revenue generated by each billed service and the actual allowable costs (A-87, Attachment C,
paragraph G.4). The adjustments will be made through one of the following methods:
1. A cash refund to the Federal Government for the Federal share of the adjustment, if
revenue exceeds costs,
2. Credits to the amounts charged to the individual programs,
3. Adjustments to future billing rates, or
4. Adjustments to allocated central service costs (Section I) if the total amount of the
adjustment for a particular service does not exceed $500,000.
c. Whenever funds are transferred from a self-insurance reserve to other accounts (e.g., general
fund), refunds shall be made to the Federal Government for its share of funds transferred,
including earned or imputed interest from the date of transfer (A-87, Attachment B, paragraph
22).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 36 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
Allowable Costs - State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect
The individual State/local departments or agencies (also known as operating agencies) are responsible for the
performance or administration of Federal awards. In order to receive cost reimbursement under Federal awards,
the department or agency usually submits claims asserting that allowable and eligible costs (direct and indirect)
have been incurred in accordance with A-87.
While direct costs are those that can be identified specifically with a particular, final cost objective, the indirect
costs are those that have been incurred for common or joint purposes, and not readily assignable to the cost
objectives specifically benefited without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. Indirect costs are normally
charged to Federal awards by the use of an indirect cost rate.
The indirect cost rate proposal (ICRP) provides the documentation prepared by a State/local department or
agency, to substantiate its request for the establishment of an indirect cost rate. The indirect costs include: (1)
costs originating in the department or agency carrying out Federal awards, and (2) costs of central governmental
services distributed through the State/local-wide central service CAP that are not otherwise treated as direct
costs. The ICRPs are based on the most current financial data and are used to either establish predetermined,
fixed, or provisional indirect cost rates or to finalize provisional rates (for rate definitions refer to A-87, Attachment
E, paragraph B).
Compliance Requirements - State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect
1. Basic Guidelines - Refer to the previous section, 'Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central Service
Costs, 1.a - Compliance Requirements-Basic Guidelines,' for the guidelines affecting the allowability of
costs (direct and indirect) under Federal awards.
2. Selected Items of Cost - Refer to the previous section, 'Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central
Service Costs, 1.b - Compliance Requirements-Selected Items of Cost,' for the principles to establish
allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost. These principles apply whether a cost is treated as
direct or indirect.
3. Allocation of Indirect Costs and Determination of Indirect Cost Rates
a. The specific methods for allocating indirect costs and computing indirect cost rates are as follows:
1. Simplified Method - This method is applicable where a governmental unit's department or
agency has only one major function, or where all its major functions benefit from the
indirect cost to approximately the same degree. The allocation of indirect costs and the
computation of an indirect cost rate may be accomplished through simplified allocation
procedures described in the circular (A-87, Attachment E, paragraph C.2).
2. Multiple Allocation Base Method - This method is applicable where a governmental unit's
department or agency has several major functions that benefit from its indirect costs in
varying degrees. The allocation of indirect costs may require the accumulation of such
costs into separate groupings which are then allocated individually to benefiting functions
by means of a base which best measures the relative degree of benefit. (For detailed
information, refer to A-87, Attachment E, paragraph C.3.)
3. Special Indirect Cost Rates - In some instances, a single indirect cost rate for all activities
of a department or agency may not be appropriate. Different factors may substantially
affect the indirect costs applicable to a particular program or group of programs, e.g., the
physical location of the work, the nature of the facilities, or level of administrative support
required. (For the requirements for a separate indirect cost rate, refer to A-87,
Attachment E, paragraph C.4.)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 37 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
4. Cost Allocation Plans - In certain cases, the cognizant agency may require a State or
local governmental unit's department or agency to prepare a CAP instead of an ICRP.
These are infrequently occurring cases in which the nature of the department or agency's
Federal awards makes impracticable the use of a rate to recover indirect costs. A CAP
required in such cases consists of narrative descriptions of the methods the department
or agency uses to allocate indirect costs to programs, awards, or other cost objectives.
Like an ICRP, the CAP must be either submitted to the cognizant agency for review,
negotiation and approval, or retained on file for inspection during audits.
4. Submission Requirements
a. Submission requirements are identified in A-87, Attachment E, paragraph D.1. All departments or
agencies of a governmental unit claiming indirect costs under Federal awards must prepare an
ICRP and related documentation to support those costs.
b. A State/local department or agency for which a cognizant Federal agency has been assigned by
OMB must submit its ICRP to its cognizant agency. Smaller local government departments or
agencies which are not required to submit a proposal to the cognizant Federal agency must
develop an ICRP in accordance with the requirements of A-87, and maintain the proposal and
related supporting documentation for audit. Where a local government receives funds as a
subrecipient only, the primary recipient will be responsible for negotiating and/or monitoring the
subrecipient's plan.
c. Each Indian tribal government desiring reimbursement of indirect costs must submit its ICRP to
its cognizant agency, which generally is the Department of the Interior.
d. ICRPs must be developed (and, when required, submitted) within 6 months after the close of the
governmental unit's fiscal year.
5. Documentation and Certification Requirements
The documentation and certification requirements for ICRPs are included in A-87, Attachment E,
paragraphs D.2 and 3, respectively. The proposal and related documentation must be retained for audit in
accordance with the record retention requirements contained in the A-102 Common Rule (45 CFR part
92).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 38 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
Allowable Costs - State Public Assistance Agency Costs
State public assistance agency costs are (1) defined as all costs allocated or incurred by the State agency except
expenditures for financial assistance, medical vendor payments, and payments for services and goods provided
directly to program recipients (e.g., day care services); and (2) normally charged to Federal awards by
implementing the public assistance cost allocation plan (CAP). The public assistance CAP provides a narrative
description of the procedures that are used in identifying, measuring and allocating all costs (direct and indirect) to
each of the programs administered or supervised by State public assistance agencies.
Attachment D of A-87 states that since the federally financed programs administered by State public assistance
agencies are funded predominantly by HHS, HHS is responsible for the requirements for the development,
documentation, submission, negotiation and approval of public assistance CAPs. These requirements are
published in Subpart E of 45 CFR part 95.
Major Federal programs typically administered by State public assistance agencies include: Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (CFDA 93.558), Medicaid (CFDA 93.778), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (CFDA 10.561), Child Support Enforcement (CFDA 93.563), Foster Care (CFDA 93.658), Adoption
Assistance (CFDA 93.659), and Social Services Block Grant (CFDA 93.667).
Compliance Requirements - State Public Assistance Agency Costs
1. Basic Guidelines - Refer to the previous section, 'Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central Service
Costs, 1.a, Compliance Requirements-Basic Guidelines,' for the guidelines affecting the allowability of
costs (direct and indirect) under Federal awards.
2. Selected Items of Cost - Refer to the previous section, 'Allowable Costs - State/Local-Wide Central
Service Costs 1.b, Compliance Requirements-Selected Items of Cost,' for the principles to establish
allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost. These principles apply whether a cost is treated as
direct or indirect.
3. Submission Requirements
Unlike most State/local-wide central service CAPs and ICRPs, an annual submission of the public
assistance CAP is not required. Once a public assistance CAP is approved, State public assistance
agencies are required to promptly submit amendments to the plan if any of the following events occur (45
CFR section 95.509):
a. The procedures shown in the existing cost allocation plan become outdated because of
organizational changes, changes to the Federal law or regulations, or significant changes in the
program levels, affecting the validity of the approved cost allocation procedures.
b. A material defect is discovered in the cost allocation plan.
c. The State plan for public assistance programs is amended so as to affect the allocation of costs.
d. Other changes occur which make the allocation basis or procedures in the approved cost
allocation plan invalid.
The amendments must be submitted to HHS for review and approval.
4. Documentation Requirements - A State must claim Federal financial participation for costs associated
with a program only in accordance with its approved cost allocation plan. The public assistance CAP
requirements are contained in 45 CFR section 95.507.
5. Implementation of Approved Public Assistance CAPs - Since public assistance CAPs are of a narrative
nature, the Federal Government needs assurance that the cost allocation plan has been implemented as
approved. This is accomplished by funding agencies' reviews, single audits, or audits conducted by the
cognizant audit agency (A-87, Attachment D, paragraph E.1).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 39 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
Sections A & B are most often test together using the same sample. See also Section A.
The most significant administrative costs of the County JFS is compensation. Costs of compensation must be
allocated by means of full-time equivalents (FTEs) and the RMS system, as set forth in the state cost allocation
plan. The costs of providers should normally be charged directly to the benefiting program. Provider costs,
including provider administrative costs, should not be charged to a cost pool as this would likely cause costs to be
charged to non-benefiting programs, contrary to the federal cost allocation principles (OMB Circular A-87 / 2 CFR
225). Costs which are readily assignable as direct costs should be charged in that manner and not charged to a
cost pool, unless required by the statewide cost allocation plan. Costs, whether charged directly or indirectly,
should be charged only to benefiting federal programs. Subrecipients may not be paid any amounts in excess of
allowable costs, whether as a fee or any other increment. For example, where a contractor is providing both WIA
and TANF program services, each cost should be allocated by the contractor to the appropriate program and
charged as direct program costs. On the other hand, where a contractor is providing general administrative
services, such as the development of an agency-wide classification system for employees, those costs are not
direct program costs. As the costs benefit all programs within the agency, they should be charged to the shared
cost pool.
Counties have a cost allocation plan (CAP) for centralized services that includes County JFS Agencies. County
JFS pays the County Auditor for their portion of the CAP.
Agencies place administrative expenditures in a pool; for combined agencies, it is referred to as the shared cost
pool. ODJFS allocates funding from the shared cost pool through FTE statistics and divides the expenditures into
program cost pools (IM, SS, and CS). Random Moment Sampling (RMS) statistics are used to allocate the
expenditures in each of the separate program (IM, SS, and CS) cost pools.
Auditors should be alert for the following:

Expenditures reimbursed as part of the County CAP and being paid directly (could be charged directly to
the program or allocated to a cost pool). Many County CAPs include rent therefore the County JFS
should not be paying for rent as a direct expense. The County JFS could be paying the County twice for
the same expenditure.

Instances where County JFS offices may show these County CAP expenditures in the CFIS system even
when they did not pay them to the County (offset by a negative expenditure in order to balance to the
county auditor’s records).

Less than arm’s length transactions (see example rent issue discussed below).
County family services agencies are not authorized under Ohio law to hold title to real properly; however, joint
county departments of Job and Family Services organized under ORC 329 can hold title to real property. The
agencies routinely rent or lease (for federal grants management purposes, the terms are interchangeable) the
facilities necessary for their operation. Rental costs are allowable costs to federal programs under OMB Circular
A-87, Attachment B, item 37. However, rates must be reasonable in light of such factors as:
• Rental costs of comparable property, if any;
• Market conditions in the area;
• Alternatives available; and
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 40 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
• The type, life expectancy, condition, and value of the property leased.
If the County JFS rents facilities from the board of county commissioners, they are subject to additional
restrictions under 2 CFR 225 (OMB Circular A-87). As the county family services agency and the board of county
commissioners are “related parties,” a rental transaction between the two is considered a “less-than-arm’s-length”
transaction. As a result, allowable rental costs are limited to the amount that would be allowed had title to the
property vested in the governmental unit; i.e., depreciation, maintenance, taxes and insurance. If the lease
amount is tied to a bond schedule for the repayment of the county’s indebtedness on the building in question, this
amount may be more than the allowable rental costs under 2 CFR 225, and the excessive amount would not be
an allowable cost to federal programs.
Please note if the County capitalizes the interest, they cannot charge the JFS depreciation + interest as
this would result in the County double-charging for the interest.
See also OAC 5101:9-4-11 (eff. 2-21-15), Rental Costs and Lease Agreements for the rule governing this
requirement. This rule is also referred to in FACCR Section F - Equipment and Real Property
Management.

FAPMTL 308 (eff 04/12/15) updated the rule, which incorporates revised Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. 200, issued December 26, 2013, as well as 45 C.F.R. 75, issued December 19,
2014. This final guidance supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circular A-87 and 2
C.F.R. 225 for expenditures subject to the UG. However, keep in mind that 2 CFR 225 is still applicable
for expenditure of pre-UG awards.
OAC 5101:9-1-15 (eff. 1-30-09) states the expenditure of funds received by grantees of federal funds and their
subrecipients must follow cost principles established in 2 C.F.R. part 225 and be in accordance with state and
local requirements. Where federal, state, or local requirements differ, the most restrictive shall apply. Part (H) of
this section lists selected items of costs where there is more restrictive policy based on Ohio law and/or where
policy clarifications have been received. Transmittal FAPMTL 309 communicated the rescinding of this
administrative code section effective 2/12/15 in lieu of guidance found in 2 CFR part 200 and other sections of the
fiscal administrative procedures manual. However, cost principles in 2 CFR part 200 are only applicable to
funding subject to the UG. For expenditures subject to non-UG, guidance 2 CFR part 225 is still in effect even
though the state law has been rescinded.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 41 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boiler Plate)
ICRP (Testing of the Program)
The ICRP is based upon costs charged to cost pools representing costs of a base year. The base year often
precedes the year in which the ICRP is prepared and the year the resulting Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
(IDCRA) is used to charge indirect costs. For example, a non-federal entity may submit an ICRP in January
2014, based upon costs incurred and charged to cost pools during fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 (2013), the
base year. The resulting IDCRA negotiated during year ending June 30, 2014 (2014) would be used as the basis
for charging indirect costs to federal awards in the year ended June 30, 2015 (2015). For this example, the term
IDCRA will also include an ICRP which is not required to be submitted to the federal agency for indirect cost
negotiation but is retained on file is first used to charge indirect costs to federal awards the same as an approved
plan resulting in an IDCRA.
An audit timing consideration is that the audit for 2013 (which covers the applicable cost pools) may be completed
before the ICRP is submitted. Therefore, as part of the audit, the auditor cannot complete testing of the ICRP.
Also, if the auditor waits to test the ICRP until 2015 (the year when this ICRP is first used to charge federal
awards), the auditor would be testing 2013 records which would then be two years old.
Continuing this example, when the IDCRA is the basis of material charges to a major program in 2015, the auditor
for 2015 is required to obtain appropriate assurance that the costs collected in the cost pools and allocation
methods are in compliance with 2 CFR 225 cost principles. The following are some acceptable options the
auditor may use to obtain this assurance.

Perform interim testing of the costs charged to cost pools (e.g., determine from management the cost pools
that management expects to include the ICRP and test the costs charged to those pools for compliance with
the cost principles of 2 CFR 225 during the 2013 audit. As part of the 2014 audit, complete testing and verify
management’s representation against the ICRP finally submitted in 2014.

Test costs charged to the cost pools underlying the ICRP during the audit of 2014, the year immediately
following the base year. This would require testing of 2013 transactions.

Wait until 2015, the year in which charges from the IDCRA are material to a major program and test costs
charged to cost pools (2013) used to prepare the ICRP. This is a much more difficult approach because it
requires going back two years to audit the cost charged to cost pools of the base year.
Advantages of the first two methods are that the testing of the costs charged to the cost pools occurs closer to the
time when the transactions occur (which makes audit exceptions easier to resolve). When material indirect costs
are charged to any Type A program (determined in accordance with Circular A-133), auditors are strongly
encouraged to use one of the first two methods. This is because under the risk-based approach, described in
OMB Circular A-133, all Type A programs are required to be considered major programs at least in every three
years and the IDCRA is usually used to charge federal awards for at least three years.
When the government submits an IDCRA, the government provides written assurance to the federal government
that the plan includes only allowable costs. Accordingly, any material unallowable costs reflected in the ICRP
should be reported as an audit finding in the year in which they are first found by audit.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 42 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
An ICRP may result in an IDCRA that covers one year, but most often results in a multi-year IDCRA. When an
ICRP has been tested in an prior year and this testing provides the auditor appropriate audit assurance, in
subsequent years the auditor is only required to perform tests to ascertain if there have been material changes to
the cost accounting practices and, if so, that the federal cognizant agency for indirect cost negotiation has been
informed.
The auditor should take appropriate steps to coordinate testing of costs charges to cost pools supporting an ICRP
with the client and, as appropriate, with the federal cognizant agency for indirect cost negotiation.
The auditor should consult with the client in the base year and the year in which the ICRP is submitted to
determine the best (e.g., most efficient) alternative under the circumstances.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 43 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
List of Selected Items of Cost Contained in OMB Cost Principles Circular A-87 (codified in 2 CFR Part 225)
(Effective August 31, 2005)
The following exhibit provides an updated listing of selected items of costs contained in 2 CFR 225 based on the
changes contained in the Federal Register notice dated August 31, 2005. This is available at the following link:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/2005/083105_a87.pdf.
This exhibit lists the selected items of costs along with a cursory description of its allowability. The numbers in
parentheses refer to the cost item in Appendix B of 2 CFR 225. The reader is strongly cautioned not to rely
exclusively on this summary exhibit but to place primary reliance on the reference circular text. There are also
cost items listed auditors may identify in the testing that are not specifically addressed in the CFR.
Selected Items of Cost
Exhibit 1
Selected Cost Item
2 CFR 225, Appendix B
State, Local, & Indian Tribal Governments
Advertising and public relation costs
(1) – Allowable with restrictions
Advisory councils
(2) – Allowable with restrictions
Alcoholic beverages
(3) – Unallowable
Alumni/ae activities
Audit costs and related services
Not specifically addressed
(4) – Allowable with restrictions and as addressed in
OMB Circular A-133
Bad debts
(5) – Unallowable
Bonding costs
(6) – Allowable with restrictions
Commencement and convocation costs
Not specifically addressed
Communication costs
(7) – Allowable
Compensation for personal services
(8) – Unique criteria for support
Compensation for personal services – organization
furnished automobile
Not specifically addressed
Compensation for personal services - sabbatical leave
costs
Not specifically addressed
Compensation for personal services - severance pay
(8)(g) - Allowable with restrictions
Contingency provisions
(9) – Unallowable with exceptions
Deans of faculty and graduate schools
Not specifically addressed
Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings
(10) – Allowable with restrictions
Depreciation and use allowances
(11) – Allowable with qualifications
Donations and contributions
(12) – Unallowable (made by recipient); not reimbursable
but value may be used as cost sharing or matching
(made to recipient)
Employee morale, health, and welfare costs
(13) – Allowable with restrictions
Entertainment costs
(14) – Unallowable
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 44 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
Equipment and other capital expenditures
(15) – Allowability based on specific requirements
Fines and penalties
(16) – Unallowable with exceptions
Fundraising and investment management costs
(17) – Unallowable with restrictions
Gains and losses depreciable assets
(18) – Allowable with restrictions (Gains and losses on
disposition of depreciable property and other capital
assets and substantial relocation of Federal programs)
General government expenses
(19) – Unallowable with exceptions
Goods or services for personal use
(20) – Unallowable
Housing and personal living expenses
Not specifically addressed
Idle facilities and idle capacity
(21) – Idle facilities - unallowable with exceptions; idle
capacity - allowable with restrictions
Insurance and indemnification
(22) – Allowable with restrictions
Interest
(23) – Allowable with restrictions
Interest - substantial relocation
Labor Relations Costs
Not specifically addressed
Not specifically addressed
Lobbying
(24)-Unallowable
Lobbying - executive lobbying costs
(24.b.) – Unallowable
Not specifically addressed (Unallowable)
Losses on other sponsored agreements or contracts
Maintenance, operations and repairs
(25) – Allowable with restrictions (Maintenance,
operations, and repairs)
Materials and supplies costs
(26) – Allowable with restrictions
Meetings and conferences
(27) – Allowable with restrictions
Memberships, subscriptions, and professional activity costs
(28) – Allowable as a direct cost for civic, community and
social organizations with Federal approval; unallowable
for lobbying organizations
Organizational costs
Not specifically addressed
Page charges in professional journals
(34.b)-Allowable with restrictions (addressed under
“Publication and printing costs”)
Participant support costs
Not specifically addressed
Patent costs
(29) – Allowable with restrictions
Pension plans
(8e) – Allowable with restrictions
Plant and homeland security costs
(30) – Allowable with restrictions
Pre-award costs
(31) – Allowable with restrictions (Pre-award costs)
Professional services costs
(32) – Allowable with restrictions
Proposal costs
(33) – Allowable with restrictions
Publication and printing costs
(34) – Allowable with restrictions
Rearrangement and alteration costs
(35) – Allowable (ordinary and normal); Allowable with
Federal prior approval (special)
Reconversion costs
(36) – Allowable with restrictions
Recruiting costs
(1.c.(1)) – Allowable with restrictions (addresses costs of
advertising only)
Relocation costs
Not specifically addressed
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 45 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
OMB Compliance Requirements
Rental cost of buildings and equipment
(37) – Allowable with restrictions
Royalties and other costs for use of patents
(38) – Allowable with restrictions
Scholarship and student aid costs
Not specifically addressed
Selling and marketing costs
(39) – Unallowable with exceptions
Specialized service facilities
Not specifically addressed
Student activity costs
Not specifically addressed
Taxes
(40) – Allowable with restrictions
Termination costs applicable to sponsored agreements
(41) – Allowable with restrictions
Training costs
(42) – Allowable for employee development
Transportation costs
Not specifically addressed
Travel costs
(43) – Allowable with restrictions
Trustees
Not specifically addressed
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 46 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB Circular A133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in the 2013 COSO (http://coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green
Book (http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf), perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program. Plan the testing
of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk the compliance requirement and perform the
testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of the compliance requirements is likely to
be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the
control risk at the maximum and considering whether additional compliance tests and reporting are required
because of ineffective internal control. For further AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20Update.p
df.
See the following individual sections for compliance audit objectives
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
See also Section A for additional procedures.
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 47 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs- Compliance Audit Objectives and Suggested Audit Procedures Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Determine whether the governmental unit complied with the provisions of A-87 (codified in2 CFR 225) as follows:
a. Direct charges to Federal awards were for allowable costs.
b. Charges to cost pools allocated to Federal awards through the central service CAPs were for
allowable costs.
c. The methods of allocating the costs are in accordance with the applicable cost principles, and
produce an equitable and consistent distribution of costs, which benefit from the central service
costs being allocated (e.g., cost allocation bases include all activities, including all State
departments and agencies and, if appropriate, non-State organizations which receive services).
d. Cost allocations were in accordance with central service CAPs approved by the cognizant agency
or, in cases where such plans are not subject to approval, in accordance with the plan on file.
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
a. In reviewing the State/local-wide central service costs, the auditor may not need to test all central service
costs (allocated or billed) every year; for example, the auditor in obtaining sufficient evidence for the opinion
may consider testing each central service at least every 5 years, and perform additional testing for central
services with operating budgets of $5 million or more.
b. If the local governmental entity is not required to submit the central service CAP and related supporting
documentation, the auditor should consider the risk of the reduced level of oversight in designing the nature,
timing and extent of compliance testing.
2. General Audit Procedures for State/Local-Wide Central Service CAPs - The following procedures apply to direct
charges to Federal awards as well as charges to cost pools that are allocated wholly or partially to Federal
awards or used in formulating indirect cost rates used for recovering indirect costs under Federal awards.
a. Test a sample of transactions for conformance with:
(1)
The criteria contained in the 'Basic Guidelines' section of A-87 (2 CFR 225), Attachment A, paragraph
C. (This step can be performed by completing the step in the suggested audit procedures section of
this audit program.)
(2)
The principles to establish allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost (A-87, Attachment B).
(This step as it relates to payroll and depreciation can be performed by completing the steps in the
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 48 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
suggested audit procedures section of this audit program.)
b. If the auditor identifies unallowable costs, the auditor should be aware that directly associated costs
might have been charged. Directly associated costs are costs incurred solely as a result of incurring
another cost, and would have not been incurred if the other cost had not been incurred. When an
unallowable cost is incurred, directly associated costs are also unallowable. For example, occupancy
costs related to unallowable general costs of government are also unallowable.
3. Special Audit Procedures for State/Local-Wide Central Service CAPs
a. Verify that the central service CAP includes the required documentation in accordance with A-87 (2 CFR
225), Attachment C, paragraph E.
b. Testing of the State/Local-Wide Central Service CAPs - Allocated Section I Costs
(1)
If new allocated central service costs were added, review the justification for including the item as
Section I costs to ascertain if the costs are allowable (e.g., if costs benefit Federal awards).
c.
(2)
Identify the central service costs that incurred a significant increase in actual costs from the prior year's
costs. Test a sample of transactions to verify the allowability of the costs.
(3)
Determine whether the bases used to allocate costs are appropriate, i.e., costs are allocated in
accordance with relative benefits received.
(4)
Determine whether the proposed bases include all activities that benefit from the central service costs
being allocated, including all users that receive the services. For example, the State-wide central
service CAP should allocate costs to all benefiting State departments and agencies, and, where
appropriate, non-State organizations, such as local government agencies.
(5)
Perform an analysis of the allocation bases by selecting agencies with significant Federal awards to
determine if the percentage of costs allocated to these agencies has increased from the prior year. For
those selected agencies with significant allocation percentage increases, determine that the data
included in the bases are current and accurate.
(6)
Verify that carry-forward adjustments are properly computed in accordance with A-87 (2 CFR 225),
Attachment C, paragraph G.3.
Testing of the State/Local-Wide Central Service CAPs - Billed Section II Costs
(Note: A 60-day working capital reserve is not automatic. Refer to the HHS publication, A Guide for State,
Local, and Indian Tribal Governments (ASMB C-10) for guidelines https://rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/ASMBc10.pdf.)
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 49 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local-Wide Central Service Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(1)
For billed central service activities accounted for in separate funds (e.g., internal service funds),
ascertain if:
(a) Retained earnings/fund balances (including reserves) are computed in accordance with the
applicable cost principles;
(b)
Working capital reserves are not excessive in amount (generally not greater than 60 days for
cash expenses for normal operations incurred for the period exclusive of depreciation, capital
costs, and debt principal costs); and
(c)
Adjustments were made when there is a difference between the revenue generated by each
billed service and the actual allowable costs.
(2)
Test to ensure that all users of services are billed in a consistent manner. For example, examine
selected billings to determine if all users (including users outside the governmental unit) are charged
the same rate for the same service.
(3)
Test that billing rates exclude unallowable costs, in accordance with applicable cost principles and
Federal statutes.
(4)
Test, where billed central service activities are funded through general revenue appropriations, that the
billing rates (or charges) are developed based on actual costs and were adjusted to eliminate profits.
(5)
For self-insurance and pension funds, ascertain if independent actuarial studies appropriate for such
activities are performed at least biennially and that current period costs were allocated based on an
appropriate study that is not over two years old.
(6)
Determine if refunds were made to the Federal Government for its share of funds transferred from the
self-insurance reserve to other accounts, including imputed or earned interest from the date of the
transfer.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 50 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local Department and Agency – Direct and Indirect
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect -Compliance Audit Objectives and
Suggested Audit Procedures Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Determine whether the governmental unit complied with the provisions of A-87 (codified in 2 CFR 225) as follows:
a. Direct charges to Federal awards were for allowable costs.
b. Charges to cost pools used in calculating indirect cost rates were for allowable costs.
c. The methods for allocating the costs are in accordance with the applicable cost principles, and
produce an equitable and consistent distribution of costs (e.g., all activities that benefit from the
indirect cost, including unallowable activities, must receive an appropriate allocation of indirect
costs).
d. Indirect cost rates were applied in accordance with approved indirect cost rate agreements
(ICRA), or special award provisions or limitations, if different from those stated in negotiated rate
agreements.
e. For local departments or agencies that do not have to submit an ICRP to the cognizant Federal
agency, indirect cost rates were applied in accordance with the ICRP maintained on file.
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
Suggested Audit Procedures:
State/Local Department or Agency Costs - Direct and Indirect
If the local department or agency is not required to submit an ICRP and related supporting documentation, the
auditor should consider the risk of the reduced level of oversight in designing the nature, timing, and extent of
compliance testing.
4. General Audit Procedures (Direct and Indirect Costs) - The following procedures apply to direct charges to
Federal awards as well as charges to cost pools that are allocated wholly or partially to Federal awards or used in
formulating indirect cost rates used for recovering indirect costs from Federal awards.
a. Test a sample of transactions for conformance with:
(1) The criteria contained in the 'Basic Guidelines' section of A-87, Attachment A, paragraph C. (This step
can be performed by completing the step in the suggested audit procedures section of this audit
program.) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/pdf/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part225appA.pdf
(2)
The principles to establish allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost (A-87 (2 CFR 225),
Attachment B). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/pdf/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part225appB.pdf
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 51 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local Department and Agency – Direct and Indirect
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
b. If the auditor identifies unallowable costs, the auditor should be aware that directly associated costs might
have been charged. Directly associated costs are costs incurred solely as a result of incurring another cost,
and would have not been incurred if the other cost had not been incurred. When an unallowable cost is
incurred, directly associated costs are also unallowable. For example, occupancy costs related to unallowable
general costs of government are also unallowable.
5. Special Audit Procedures for State/Local Department or Agency ICRPs
a. Verify that the ICRP includes the required documentation in accordance with A-87 (2 CFR 225), Attachment
E, paragraph D.
b.
Testing of the ICRP - There may be a timing consideration when the audit is completed before the ICRP is
completed. In this instance, the auditor should consider performing interim testing of the costs charged to the
cost pools and the allocation bases (e.g., determine from management the cost pools that management
expects to include in the ICRP and test the costs for compliance with A-87 (2 CFR 225). Should there be audit
exceptions; corrective action may be taken earlier to minimize questioned costs. In the next year's audit, the
auditor should complete testing and verify management's representations against the completed ICRP.
(1)
When the ICRA is the basis for indirect cost charged to a major program, the auditor is required to obtain
appropriate assurance that the costs collected in the cost pools and allocation methods are in
compliance with the applicable cost principles. The following procedures are some acceptable options
the auditor may use to obtain this assurance:
(a)
(b)
Indirect Cost Pool - Test the indirect cost pool to ascertain if it includes only allowable costs in
accordance with A-87 (2 CFR 225):
a) Test to ensure that unallowable costs are identified and eliminated from the indirect cost pool
(e.g., capital expenditures, general costs of government).
b)
Identify significant changes in expense categories between the prior ICRP and the current
ICRP. Test a sample of transactions to verify the allowability of the costs.
c)
Trace the central service costs that are included in the indirect cost pool to the approved
State/local-wide central service CAP or to plans on file when submission is not required.
Direct Cost Base - Test the methods of allocating the costs to ascertain if they are in accordance
with the applicable provisions of A-87 and produce an equitable distribution of costs.
a) Determine that the proposed base(s) includes all activities that benefit from the indirect costs
being allocated.
b)
If the direct cost base is not limited to direct salaries and wages, determine that distorting
items are excluded from the base. Examples of distorting items include capital expenditures,
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 52 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State/Local Department and Agency – Direct and Indirect
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
flow-through funds (such as benefit payments), and subaward costs in excess of $25,000 per
subaward.
c)
(c)
Other Procedures
a) Examine the employee time report system results (where and if used) to ascertain if they are
accurate, and are based on the actual effort devoted to the various functional and
programmatic activities to which the salary and wage costs are charged. (Refer to A-87 (2
CFR 225), Attachment B, paragraph 8.h for additional information on support of salaries and
wages.) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/pdf/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part225appB.pdf pg. 5/15.
b)
(2)
For an ICRP using the multiple allocation base method, test statistical data (e.g., square
footage, audit hours, salaries and wages) to ascertain if the proposed allocation or rate bases
are reasonable, updated as necessary, and do not contain any material omissions.
Testing of Charges Based Upon the ICRA - Perform the following procedures to test the application of
charges to Federal awards based upon an ICRA:
(a) Obtain and read the current ICRA and determine the terms in effect.
(b)
(3)
Determine the appropriateness of the allocation base (e.g., salaries and wages, modified total
direct costs).
Select a sample of claims for reimbursement and verify that the rates used are in accordance with
the rate agreement, that rates were applied to the appropriate bases, and that the amounts claimed
were the product of applying the rate to the applicable base. Verify that the costs included in the
base(s) are consistent with the costs that were included in the base year (e.g., if the allocation base
is total direct costs, verify that current-year direct costs do not include costs items that were treated
as indirect costs in the base year).
Other Procedures - No Negotiated ICRA
(a) If an indirect cost rate has not been negotiated by a cognizant Federal agency, as required, the
auditor should determine whether documentation exists to support the costs. Where the auditee
has documentation, the suggested general audit procedures (direct and indirect costs under
paragraph 3.b of this section) should be performed to determine the appropriateness of the indirect
cost charges to awards.
(b)
If an indirect cost rate has not been negotiated by a cognizant agency, as required, and
documentation to support the indirect costs does not exist, the auditor should question the costs
based on a lack of supporting documentation.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 53 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State Public Assistance Agency Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
State Public Assistance Agency Costs - Compliance Audit Objectives and Suggested Audit Procedures
Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Determine whether the governmental unit complied with the provisions of A-87 (codified in 2 CFR 225) as follows:
a. Direct charges to Federal awards were for allowable costs.
b. Charges to cost pools allocated to Federal awards through the public assistance CAP were for
allowable costs.
c. The approved public assistance CAP correctly describes the actual procedures used to identify,
measure, and allocate costs to each of the programs operated by the State public assistance
agency. However, the actual procedures or methods of allocating costs must be in accordance
with the applicable cost principles, and produce an equitable and consistent distribution of costs.
d. Charges to Federal awards are in accordance with the approved public assistance CAP. This
does not apply if the auditor first determines that the approved CAP is not in compliance with the
applicable cost principles and/or produces an inequitable distribution of costs.
e. The employee time reporting systems are implemented and operated in accordance with the
methodologies described in the approved public assistance CAP.
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
The following procedures apply to direct charges to Federal awards as well as charges to cost pools that are
allocated wholly or partially to Federal awards.
6.
a. Since a significant amount of the costs in the public assistance CAP are allocated based on employee time
reporting systems (e.g., effort certification, personnel activity report and/or random moment sampling), it is
suggested that the auditor consider the risk when designing the nature, timing, and extent of compliance
testing.
b. General Audit Procedures – The following procedures apply to direct charges to Federal awards as well as
charges to cost pools that are allocated wholly or partially to Federal awards.
(1) Test a sample of transactions for conformance with:
(a)
The criteria contained in the “Basic Guidelines” section of A-87 (2 CFR 225), Appendix A,
paragraph C.
(b)
The principles to establish allowability or unallowability of certain items of cost (A-87 (2 CFR 225),
Appendix B).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 54 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State Public Assistance Agency Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(2) If the auditor identifies unallowable costs, the auditor should be aware that directly associated costs might
have been charged. Directly associated costs are costs incurred solely as a result of incurring another
cost, and would have not been incurred if the other cost had not been incurred. When an unallowable
cost is incurred, directly associated costs are also unallowable. For example, occupancy costs related to
unallowable general costs of government are also unallowable.
d. Special Audit Procedures for Public Assistance CAPs
(1) Verify that the State public assistance agency is complying with the submission requirements, i.e., an
amendment is promptly submitted when any of the events identified in 45 CFR section 95.509 occur.
(2)
Verify that public assistance CAP includes the required documentation in accordance with 45 CFR
section 95.507.
(3)
Testing of the Public Assistance CAP – Test the methods of allocating the costs to ascertain if they are
in accordance with the applicable provisions of the cost principles and produce an equitable distribution
of costs. Appropriate detailed tests may include:
(4)
(a)
Examine the results of the employee time reporting systems to ascertain if they are accurate, and
are based on the actual effort devoted to the various functional and programmatic activities to
which the salary and wage costs are charged.
(b)
Since the most significant cost pools in terms of dollars are usually allocated based upon the
distribution of income maintenance and social services workers efforts identified through random
moment time studies, determine whether the time studies are implemented and operated in
accordance with the methodologies described in the approved public assistance CAP. For
example, verify the adequacy of the controls governing the conduct and evaluation of the study,
determine that the sampled observations were properly selected and performed, the
documentation of the observations was properly completed, and that the results of the study were
correctly accumulated and applied. Testing may include observing or interviewing staff who
participate in the time studies to determine if they are correctly recording their activities.
(c)
Test statistical data (e.g., square footage, case counts, salaries and wages) to ascertain if the
proposed allocation bases are reasonable, updated as necessary, and do not contain any material
omissions.
Testing of Charges Based Upon the Public Assistance CAP – If the approved public assistance CAP is
determined to be in compliance with the applicable cost principles and produces an equitable
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 55 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
State Public Assistance Agency Costs
Compliance Audit Objectives & Suggested Audit
Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
distribution of costs, verify that the methods of charging costs to Federal awards are in accordance with
the approved CAP and the provisions of the approval documents issued by HHS. Detailed compliance
tests may include:
(a)
Verify that the cost allocation schedules, supporting documentation and allocation data are
accurate and that the costs are allocated in compliance with the approved CAP.
(b)
Reconcile the allocation statistics of labor costs to completed employee time reporting documents
(e.g., personnel activity reports or random moment sampling observation forms).
(c)
Reconcile the allocation statistics of non-labor costs to allocation data, (e.g., square footage or
case counts).
(d)
Verify direct charges to supporting documents (e.g., purchase orders).
(e)
Reconcile the costs to the Federal claims.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 56 of 92
Part III
B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
*
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 57 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
OMB Compliance Requirements
C. Cash Management
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
When awards provide for advance payments, recipient must follow procedures to minimize the time elapsing
between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement and establish similar procedures for
subrecipients. Pass-through entities must establish reasonable procedures to ensure receipt of reports on
subrecipients' cash balances and cash disbursements in sufficient time to enable the pass-through entities to
submit complete and accurate cash transactions reports to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.
Pass-through entities must monitor cash drawdowns by their subrecipients to ensure that subrecipients conform
substantially to the same standards of timing and amount as apply to the pass-through entity.
U.S. department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations at 31 CFR part 205, which implement the Cash
Management Improvement Act of 1990 (CMIA), as amended (Pub. L. 101-453; 31 USC 6501 et seq.), require
State recipients to enter into agreements that prescribe specific methods of drawing down Federal funds (funding
techniques) for selected large programs. The agreements also specify the terms and conditions under which an
interest liability would be incurred. Programs not covered by a Treasury-State Agreement are subject to
procedures prescribed by Treasury is Subpart B of 31 CFR part 205.
Except for interest earned on advances of funds exempt under the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (31 USC
6501 et seq.) and the Indian Self-Determination Act (23 USC 450), interest earned by local government and
Indian tribal government grantees and subgrantees on advances is required to be submitted promptly, but at least
quarterly, to the Federal agency. Up to $100 per year may be kept for administrative expenses. Interest earned by
non-State non-profit entities on Federal fund balances in excess of $250, regardless of the funding agency, is
required to be remitted to Department of Health and Human Services, Payment Management System, P.O. Box
6021, Rockville, MD 20852.
Note: Violations of cash management rules alone generally should not result in a questioned cost unless
the entity spent the interest earnings related to the excess grant cash balances on hand throughout the
year (these monies would be payable back to the pass-through/federal agency). Further, the interest
earnings expended must exceed $25,000 in a single major program to be a questioned cost. (Source:
AOS CFAE)
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for cash management are contained in the A-102 Common Rule (§___.21) (codified under 45
CFR part 92), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency
regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award.
Availability of Other Information
Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service maintains a Cash Management Improvement Act web page
(http://www.fms.treas.gov/cmia/).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 58 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
All SSBG funding is on an advance basis.
ODJFS Subgrant Agreement, Article V. Amount of Grant/Payments, Section B indicates the “SUBGRANTEE
will limit cash draws from ODJFS to the minimum amount needed for actual, immediate requirements in
accordance with Cash Management Improvement Act, 31 CFR Part 205, 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92, 7 CFR Part
3016, Transmittal No. TANF-ACF-Pl-01-02 issued by the United States Department of Health and Human
Services, and ODJFS requirements including Chapter 7 (OAC 5101:9-7-03) of the Fiscal Administrative
Procedures Manual.”
OAC 5101:9-7-03 Public assistance (PA) financing and cash management is the State rule for cash
management. The rule can be found in chapter 7 of the Fiscal Administrative Procedures Manual, which is
available http://emanuals.odjfs.state.oh.us/emanuals/ .
For federal references see 7 CFR 3016, 45 CFR 92.20 (Part 74 is for Higher Ed) and 31 CFR 205 or here CFR
lookup (select year 2014 if using the CFR lookup).
The requirements for cash management for the Department of Health and Human Services are contained in 45
CFR 92.20, as follows:
Cash management. Procedures for minimizing the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S.
Treasury and disbursement by grantees and subgrantees must be followed whenever advance payment
procedures are used. Grantees must establish reasonable procedures to ensure the receipt of reports on
subgrantees' cash balances and cash disbursements in sufficient time to enable them to prepare complete and
accurate cash transactions reports to the awarding agency. When advances are made by letter-of-credit or
electronic transfer of funds methods, the grantee must make drawdowns as close as possible to the time of
making disbursements. Grantees must monitor cash drawdowns by their subgrantees to assure that they conform
substantially to the same standards of timing and amount as apply to advances to the grantees.
See also Section L (Reporting). Funding is based on expenditures but is not on a reimbursement basis.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 59 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
2.
3.
4.
5.
the 2013 COSO (http://coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf), perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program. Plan the
testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance requirement
and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of the
compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
Determine whether for advance payments the recipient/subrecipient followed procedures to minimize the
time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury, or pass-through entity, and their
disbursement.
Determine whether the pass-through entity implemented procedures to ensure that advance payments to
subrecipients conformed substantially to the same timing requirements that apply to the pass-through
entity.
Determine whether interest earned on advances was reported/remitted as required.
Determine whether an entity has awards funded on a reimbursement payment basis, and, if so, whether
program costs are paid for with entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal
government.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Here are some questions that can help in documenting the above control requirements
1. What control does the County/district have to limit cash draws from ODJFS to the minimum amount
needed for actual, immediate requirements?
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 60 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
2. For County/district subrecipients (subgrantee), what control procedures were established to ensure the
receipt of reports on subgrantees' cash balances and cash disbursements in sufficient time to enable the
County/district to prepare complete and accurate cash transactions reports to the awarding agency?
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 61 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
Note: The following procedures are intended to be applied to each program determined to be major. However,
due to the nature of cash management and the system of cash management in place in a particular entity, it may
be appropriate and more efficient to perform these procedures for all programs collectively rather than separately
for each program.
Recipients Other than States and Subrecipients
1. For SSBG which receives advances of Federal funds, ascertain the procedures established with the Federal
agency or pass-through entity to minimize the time between the transfer of Federal funds and the
disbursement of funds for program purposes.
2. Select a sample of Federal cash draws and verify that:
a. Established procedures to minimize the time elapsing between drawdown and disbursement were
followed.
b. To the extent available, program income, rebates, refunds, and other income and receipts were disbursed
before requesting additional cash payments as required by the A-102 Common Rule (§ ___.21) (codified
in 45 CFR part 92).
3. Review records to determine if interest was earned on Federal cash draws. If so, review evidence to ascertain
whether it was returned to the appropriate agency.
4. For those programs where Federal cash draws are passed through to subrecipients (testing of this procedure
may be done in conjunction with Section M procedures):
a.
Select a representative sample of subrecipients and ascertain the procedures implemented to
ensure that subrecipients minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of Federal funds from
the recipient and the disbursement of funds for program purposes (A-102 Common Rule
§___.37(a)(4)).
b.
Select a representative sample of Federal cash draws by subrecipients and ascertain that they
conformed to the procedures.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 62 of 92
Part III
C. Cash Management
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 63 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
OMB Compliance Requirements
E. Eligibility
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
Note: The OMB compliance supplement indicates that this is N/A. However, ODJFS indicates this should be
tested at the local level.
The specific requirements for eligibility are unique to each Federal program and are found in the laws, regulations,
and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. This compliance requirement
specifies the criteria for determining the individuals, groups of individuals (including area of service delivery), or
subrecipients that can participate in the program and the amounts for which they qualify.
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for eligibility are contained in program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the
terms and conditions of the award.
There are no OMB Compliance Supplement requirements applicable to this program.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 64 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
Per ODJFS, there is no federal or state criterion for determining eligibility for Title XX recipients. Each County
prepares and submits to ODJFS a profile outlining services provided as well as eligibility requirements for Title XX
recipients. The County’s profile is not included in the State Plan; the profiles will be maintained in the
State/County files.
The ODJFS Title XX plan can be accessed at http://emanuals.odjfs.state.oh.us/emanuals.
Each county department of Job and Family Services are required to complete an annual JFS 0121 “Title XX
County Profile” and submit it to the ODJFS by January 31. Submitted profiles must contain the signature of
approval by the CDJFS director and county commissioners (or designee). If the original has been altered, the
CDJFS is required to submit the approved amended profile by the end of May. The CDJFS must maintain the
original and all amended profiles, with signatures on file. See also FCASMTL 303 and OAC :5101:2-25-03
Auditors should note that since the County may amend their profile they will need to obtain the profile in effect for
their audit period/testing period from the County JFS office.
Auditors should insert material eligibility requirements to test for their respective counties from the County’s
profile.
An application must be submitted/signed by the consumer in need of the service. An individual service plan is
required to provide any service defined as a Title XX service per rule OAC 5101:2-25-01. Protective service cases
require a case record that documents the circumstances of actual or potential abuse, neglect, or exploitation of
the adult or child. The intent is to provide service on an individual basis based on a specific need.
NOTE: In some cases, the county may choose to supplement other program activities with funding from this
program. If that is the case, eligibility testing may be done in conjunction with the other program(s).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 65 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
the 2013 COSO (http://www.coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf), perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program . Plan
the testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance
requirement and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of
the compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
2. Determine whether required eligibility determinations were made, (including obtaining any required
documentation/verifications), and that individual program participants were determined to be eligible, and
that only eligible individuals participated in the program.
3. Determine whether amounts provided to or on behalf of eligibles were calculated in accordance with
program requirements.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
ODJFS indicates Bureau of Monitoring and Consulting Service’s compliance measures should be utilized.
The ODJFS Guided Self-Assessment (GSA) or County/District JFS policies should document controls for
meeting compliance requirements. Auditors should review the information provided by the
County/District JFS to gain an understanding of the procedures in place.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 66 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
1. Obtain and evaluate the County/district plan, as well as written policies and procedures pertaining to the
Social Services Block Grant Program (SSBG).
2. Based on the results of the test of controls, select case files and determine whether payments were made to
eligible recipients. The sample selected for testing Types of Services Allowed or Unallowed (Compliance
Requirement A) may be used for this test, if appropriate. (Include specific eligibility requirements for your
county/district, as necessary).
Auditors should review County/district profile to determine procedures for testing eligibility if this is applicable.
Below are suggestions however, steps from the County/district profile may be such that these procedures would
not be applicable.
1)
Eligibility for Individuals
a) The County/district may use a computer or manual system for processing individual eligibility
determinations and delivery of benefits. (Often these computer systems are complex and will be separate
from the County/district’s regular financial accounting system.) Typical functions performed for eligibility
are:
(1) Perform calculations to assist in determining who is eligible and the amount of benefits.
(2) Payment of benefits (e.g., write checks).
(3) Maintain eligibility records, including information about each individual and benefits paid to or on
behalf of the individual (regular payments, refunds, and adjustments).
(4) Track the period of time an individual is eligible and stop benefits at the end of a predetermined
period unless, there is a redetermination of eligibility.
(5) Perform matches with other computer databases to verify eligibility (e.g., matches to verify earnings
or identify individuals who are deceased).
(6) Control who is authorized to approve benefits for eligible individuals (e.g., an employee may be
approving benefits on-line and this process may be controlled by passwords or other access
controls).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 67 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
(7) Produce exception reports indicating likely errors that need follow-up (e.g., when benefits exceed a
certain amount, would not be appropriate for a particular classification of individuals, or are paid more
frequently than normal).
(8) Because of the diversity of computer systems, both hardware and software, it is not practical for this
program to provide suggested audit procedures to address each system. However, generally
accepted auditing standards provide guidance for the auditor when computer processing relates to
accounting information that can materially affect the financial statements being audited. Similarly,
when eligibility is material to a major program, and a computer system is integral to eligibility
compliance, the auditor should follow this guidance and consider the non-Federal entity’s computer
processing. The auditor should perform audit procedures relative to the computer system for
eligibility as necessary to support the opinion on compliance for the major program. Due to the
nature and controls of computer systems, the auditor may choose to perform these tests of the
computer systems as part of testing the internal controls for eligibility.
b) Select a representative number of individuals receiving benefits and perform tests to ascertain if:
(1) The required eligibility determinations and redeterminations, (including obtaining any required
documentation/verifications) were performed and the individual was determined to be eligible.
Specific individuals were eligible in accordance with the compliance requirements of the program.
(Note that some programs have both initial and continuing eligibility requirements and the auditor
should design and perform appropriate tests for both. Also, some programs require periodic
redeterminations of eligibility, which should also be tested.)
(2) Benefits paid to or on behalf of the individuals were calculated correctly and in compliance with the
requirements of the program.
(3) Benefits were discontinued when the period of eligibility expired.
c) In some programs, the County/district may use a quality control process to obtain assurances about
eligibility. Review the quality control process and perform tests to ascertain if it is operating to effectively
meet the objectives of the process and in compliance with applicable program requirements.
2) Eligibility for Group of Individuals or Area of Service Delivery – Auditors should review County/district profile to
determine if this is applicable. Services for free & Services for a fee. Only those service to which fees are
applicable are counted in determining the amount of the fee. Therefore, services available to consumers
without regard to income would not be counted.
3) Eligibility for Subrecipients – Auditors should review County/district profile to determine if this is applicable.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 68 of 92
Part III
E. Eligibility
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 69 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
OMB Compliance Requirements
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds (“Period of Performance”
elsewhere in the FACCR)
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
Federal awards may specify a time period during which the non-Federal entity may use the Federal funds. Where
a funding period is specified, a non-Federal entity may charge to the award only costs resulting from obligations
incurred during the funding period and any pre-award costs authorized by the Federal awarding agency . Also, if
authorized by the Federal program, unobligated balances may be carried over and charged for obligations of a
subsequent funding period. Obligations means the amounts of orders placed, contracts and subgrants awarded,
goods and services received, and similar transactions during a given period that will require payment by the nonFederal entity during the same or a future period (A-102 Common Rule, § ___.23; OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR
section 215.28).
Non-Federal entities shall liquidate all obligations incurred under the award not later than 90 days after the end of
the funding period (or as specified in a program regulation). The Federal agency may extend this deadline upon
request (A-102 Common Rule, § ___.23; OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.71)).
An example used by a program to determine when an obligation occurs (is made) is found under Part 4,
Department of Education, CFDA 84.000 (Cross-Cutting Section).
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for period of availability of Federal funds are contained in the A-102 Common Rule (§____.23)
(codified in 45 CFR 92 for HHS), program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and
conditions of the award.
Definition of Obligation - An obligation is not necessarily a liability in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. When an obligation occurs (is made) depends on the type of property or services that the
obligation is for (34 CFR section 76.707) (OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Department of
Education Cross-Cutting –is referred to in Part 3 as an example for all federal agencies):
IF AN OBLIGATION IS FOR --
THE OBLIGATION IS MADE --
(a) Acquisition of real or personal property.
On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a
binding written commitment to acquire the property.
(b) Personal services by an employee of the State or
subgrantee.
When the services are performed.
(c) Personal services by a contractor who is not an
employee of the State or subgrantee.
On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a
binding written commitment to obtain the services.
(d) Performance of work other than personal services.
On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a
binding written commitment to obtain the work.
(e) Public utility services.
When the State or subgrantee receives the services.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 70 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
OMB Compliance Requirements
IF AN OBLIGATION IS FOR --
THE OBLIGATION IS MADE --
(f) Travel.
When the travel is taken.
(g) Rental of real or personal property.
When the State or subgrantee uses the property.
(h) A pre-agreement cost that was properly approved
by the State under the applicable cost principles.
On the first day of the subgrant period.
The act of an SEA or other grantee awarding Federal funds to an LEA or other eligible entity within a State does
not constitute an obligation for the purposes of this compliance requirement. An SEA or other grantee may not
reallocate grant funds from one subrecipient to another after the period of availability ends.
If a grantee or subgrantee uses a different accounting system or accounting principles from one year to the next,
it shall demonstrate that the system or principle was not improperly changed to avoid returning funds that were
not timely obligated. A grantee or subgrantee may not make accounting adjustments after the period of
availability in an attempt to offset audit disallowances. The disallowed costs must be refunded.
OMB Specific Information (Source: Section IV of the Supplement)
SSBG funds must be expended by the State in the fiscal year allotted or in the succeeding fiscal year (42
USC1397a(c)).
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 71 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
Period of Availability and Liquidation
Agencies may occasionally have 2 grants open at the same time. (Example: Both TANF FFY 13 14 and TANF
FFY 14 15 will be available during the Oct 2014 – Dec 2014 quarter.) It is important for agencies to consider the
period of availability and the liquidation period of those grants, as entered into CFIS, in order to make the
appropriate grant choice during this time.
Other than claims for Title XX funding, DHHS allows a State to file a claim for FFP within 2 years after the
calendar quarter in which the expenditure was made (45 CFR 95.7.) See OMB Specific Information on previous
page. County agencies must report those expenditures to ODJFS within 7 calendar quarters after the
expenditure was made to ensure the State reports the expenditure within the time frames. (Please refer to 45
CFR 95.13 regarding how to determine when an expenditure was made.)
Per ODJFS, Federal regulations in 45 CFR 95.13 define incurred as the quarter in which a payment was made
even if the payment was for a month in a previous quarter. And for depreciation – the quarter the expenditure was
recorded in the accounting records.
Because of the two-year time limit, agencies have the option of posting expenditures incurred prior to 9/30/14
(and after 10/1/13) to either the FFY 14 grants or FFY 15 grants. Expenditures may be charged to a future grant
(within 2 years) but cannot be charged to a grant that is past its period of availability.


Agencies are encouraged to utilize FFY 14 allocation balances by completing a Post Allocated
Adjustment (PAA) for expenditures that occurred for services as of 9/30/2014,
Agencies may not, under any circumstances, post expenditures incurred after 9/30/14 to a FFY 14 grant.
FFY 15 grants must be used for expenditures incurred on or after the beginning of the new FFY (10/1/14.)
Accessing FFY 14 Grants



FFY 14 grants began on 10/01/2013 and are available through 9/30/2014. The liquidation period for the
FFY 14 grants is 10/01/2014 – 12/31/2014; agencies may draw through Week 52 and report expenditures
against this grant through the Oct – Dec reporting period.
During the liquidation period, agencies may post expenditures for services which occurred prior to 9-302014 to FFY 14 grants through a Post Allocated Adjustment (PAA).
It is important to note that when doing a PAA to access FFY 14 grants that have a match that only the
FFP portion is moved through the PAA adjustment. Examples of grants that have match are IV-B, ESSA,
Caseworker Visits etc.
Accessing FFY 15 Grants



FFY 15 grants begin on 10/01/2014 are available for expenditures incurred through 9/30/2015. FFY 15
grants will have a liquidation period of 10/01/2015 – 12/31/2015; agencies may post expenditures and
submit draw requests until 12/31/2015.
Since the FFY 15, grants begin on 10/01/2014 expenditures posted to CFIS Web will automatically be
mapped to the FFY 15 grants.
Agencies only need to do a PAA for those expenditures that they are opting to move to the FFY 14 grant
(those incurred before 10/1/14). Again, a PAA for this purpose is not a requirement; it is an option for
those with remaining FFY14 balances.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 72 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
the 2013 COSO (http://www.coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf) perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program . Plan
the testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance
requirement and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of
the compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
2. Determine whether Federal funds were obligated within the period of availability and obligations were
liquidated within the required time period.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Here are some questions that can help in documenting the above control requirements
1. What procedures does the County/district JFS have in place to report expenditures within two years after
the expense incurred?
2. What procedures does the County/district JFS have in place for coding adjustments submitted to ODJFS
one quarter prior to the end of the two-year period?
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 73 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
1. Review the award documents and regulations pertaining to the program and determine any award-specific
requirements related to the period of availability and document the availability period.
2. Test transactions charged to the Federal award after the end of the period of availability to verify that the:
a.
underlying obligations occurred within the period of availability, and
b.
liquidation (payment) was made within the allowed time period.
3. Test transactions that were recorded during the period of availability and verify that the underlying obligations
occurred within the period of availability.
4. Test adjustments (i.e., manual journal entries) to the Federal funds and verify that these adjustments were for
transactions that occurred during the period of availability.
As long as the auditor obtains sufficient, appropriate evidence to meet the period of availability audit
objectives, the auditor may test period of availability using the same test items used to test other types of
compliance requirements (e.g., activities allowed or unallowed or allowable costs/cost principles). However,
if this approach is used, the auditor should exercise care in designing the sample to ensure that sample
items are suitable for testing the stated objectives of compliance requirements covered by the sample.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 74 of 92
Part III
H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds
(“Period of Performance” elsewhere in the FACCR)
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 75 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
OMB Compliance Requirements
L. Reporting
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
The OMB Compliance Supplement indicates Section L is applicable to this program for Subaward Reporting
under the Transparency Act, however this would only be applicable at the state level or for direct awards.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 76 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
OAC 5101:9-7-03 and 5101:9-7-03.1, provide guidance on the financing, cash management, and quarterly
reconciliation (including some CR 520/ Form 02827 reporting requirements). Public Assistance (PA) funds are
determined quarterly and disbursed weekly to the County JFS, upon receipt of the county cash draw request for
funds. Available funds are limited by state appropriation and federal grant awards. All payments are issued via
electronic funds transfer (EFT). County JFS shall report receipt of revenue, disbursements of funds and provide
documentation to justify the allocation of costs and various funds by the submission of the Income Maintenance
RMS – Random Moment Sample Observations or the Social Services Random Moment Sample Observations. A
state expenditure reconciliation report of the PA data subset is prepared quarterly to show a summary of net
expenditures and receipts. The county agency is given the opportunity to review the reconciliation (over / under)
reports for accuracy. The quarterly PA fund reconciliation review requirement is intended to correct instances
where ODJFS or the county agency discover errors, i.e. incorrect splits of shared costs or wrong allocations,
incorrect time study codes, and/or JFS 02827 codes and expenditures. Quarterly close - The PA fund is
reconciled each quarter based on the final reconciliation reports.
Please note: Counties often refer to the grant reconciliation reports as the Over / Under Reports.
Per As the result of an internal five-year rule review and to reflect the most current funding practices
available, ODJFS communicated in FAPMTL 241 (dated 3-28-12) rule 5101:9-7-06 of the OAC titled
"Reporting Collections and Earnings on Erroneous Payment Recoveries" which includes information on
the earnings for the recovery of erroneous payments in addition to current reporting procedures. To
ensure reporting is correct at the state level, it is imperative that the CDJFS report collections of benefits
from past years separately from the collection of benefits that were issued during the current state fiscal
year (SFY). This requirement is paragraph (F) in the rule. ODJFS established coding and communicated
that coding via a Bureau of County Finance Technical Assistance (BCFTA) update 2013-15 (dated
1/10/2013).. See http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/lpc/calendar/fileLINKNAME.asp?ID=FAPMTL241 and
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/BB/20130110-BCFTA-Update-2013-15-New-Receipt-Coding.stm
The Rule governing county collections is as follows. Please note AOS only included Social Services
Block Grant specific requirements. If auditors need additional information on reporting county
collections, they should review the entire OAC requirement.
OAC 5101:9-7-06 Reporting Collections and Earning on Erroneous Payment Recoveries (Eff. 3-30-12)
A. When a public assistance recipient has received a cash or benefit overpayment for general assistance
(GA), disability financial assistance (DFA), temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) or aid to
dependent children (ADC) assistance, family emergency assistance (FEA) medical, child care, Medicaid,
food assistance (FA), early learning initiative (ELI), employment retention incentive program (ERI) or
prevention, retention and contingency (PRC);, the county department of job and family services (CDJFS)
shall recover the funds.
B. As outlined in section 5107.76 of the Revised Code, a CDJFS is entitled to earnings for the recovery of
erroneous payments. Earnings for recovery of erroneous payments do not apply to participant expense
allowances or other support service cash benefits. The CDJFS may recover erroneous payments through
benefit reduction or through cash collections.
C. Earnings for recovery of erroneous payments apply to overpayments recovered through benefit
reduction. Net overpayment amounts result in earnings when collected and appropriately reported. The
CDJFS may verify earnings from collections amounts using its own county's "GRP670RA" report. This is
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 77 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
a detailed report of all Ohio works first (OWF) and ADC erroneous payments collected through benefit
reduction.
D. The CDJFS reports erroneous payment collections that qualify for earnings and the Ohio department of
job and family services (ODJFS) issues earnings as follows:
1.) Medicaid collections reported on or after July 1, 2004:
a) The CDJFS shall deposit collections of erroneous payments in the PA fund and report the
cash collections as earnings from Medicaid collections on the CR520/JFS 02827.
b) After the close of each quarter, ODJFS calculates the reported amounts and multiplies by
the current non-federal share percentage, which changes every FFY, effective October
first, and then multiplies the product of that calculation by fifty per cent.
c) ODJFS issues the amount as an EFT to the county.
E. In addition to collections that are eligible for earnings, the CDJFS shall also report the following
erroneous payment collections as receipts on the CR 520/JFS 02827:
a. Cancellations, collections, refunds, or other GA receipts;
b. Collections of erroneous payments for FEA medical;
c. Collections of ADC erroneous payments made prior to October 1, 1987;
d. Cancellations, collections, refunds, or other child care receipts;
e. Collections of erroneous payments of ELI funds;
f.
Collections of erroneous payments of ERI funds; and
g. Collections of PRC.
F. The CDJFS will report collections of benefits that were issued in a previous fiscal year separately than
the collections of benefits that were issued during the current SFY.
G. ODJFS will include the erroneous payment collections, as reported on the CR 520/JFS 02827, on the
over/under report and collect them as part of the quarterly close calculation.
(Source: ODJFS)
COUNTY LEVEL REQUIREMENTS – can be tested in conjunction with other programs requiring the same
form.
In order for ODJFS to prepare the financial reports required, they must obtain financial information from the
counties. The CR 520/2827 is loaded into CFIS web, however the County Auditor still needs to sign and certify
the final report. If the report in CFIS web is not signed is not considered final. After the report is signed, it cannot
be changed. See OAC 5101:9-7-03, 5101:9-7-03.1 & 5101:9-7-29. Tests related to reporting at the county level
for public assistance will be limited to the 02827/ CR 520 form and include the following:
1. The CDJFS director must certify the accuracy and amount of disbursements in Section C.
2. The signed quarterly financial statement (CR 520 report) shall imported into CFIS Web no later than the
10th day of the second month following the quarter the report represents..
Please note: The 02827/ CR 520 should be reported on a cash basis.
The Counties are also required to include cash or benefit overpayments on CR 520/JFS 02827. Counties retain
benefit recoveries monies (incentive monies) and report quarterly on the CR 520/JFS 02827 to offset future draws
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 78 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
from ODJFS. Most recoveries are from court convictions and many are uncollectible. The County recovers
collectible benefits via payback plans or a reduction in benefits.
ODJFS CR 520/02827 form and instructions can be found at
http://jfs.ohio.gov/ofs/bcfta/TOOLS/BCFTAForms.stm .
Counties are still required to submit monthly financial data as an upload in CFIS no later than the
eighteenth day of the month following the month of the transaction (see OAC 5101:9-7-29)
Counties can also receive sliding scale fees for such things as elder care (check applicable county plan).
If the County does accept monies, they should have established fee collection procedures. Counties
enter these monies into CFIS and like recoveries, report quarterly on the JFS CR502/ 02827 and offset
future draws from ODJFS.
Auditors should test the ODJFS 02827 Form/ CR 520 in conjunction with other programs also reported on
the Form. The following is a list of programs reported on the ODJFS 02827/ CR 520 Quarterly Financial
Statement Public Assistance Fund Certification Sheet:
Medicaid
CHIP / SCHIP
Food Assistance / SNAP
TANF
Child Care Cluster
Social Service Block Grant
ODJFS 04282
Title XX Social Services Block Grant Summary of Direct Services Provided and Purchased Services Contracts &
Agreements - The JFS 04282 captures data for individuals receiving public or private services funded in whole or
in part with SSBG Funds. Direct services provided and purchased services contracts and agreements are no
longer separated. The form has been revised to match current Federal filing requirements. Per the Administrative
Procedure Manual Section 5501, the reporting requirements have changed from monthly to quarterly. Only
recipient Data is reported. The 04282 reports are to be submitted to the ODJFS Bureau of Federal Financial
Reporting no later than 45 calendar days following the end of the quarter. Counties must submit a report even if
SSBG direct services were not provided and/or purchased services expenditures were not made during the
quarter.
Instructions for the JFS 04282 can be found here
http://www.odjfs.state.oh.us/forms/file.asp?id=1137&type=application/pdf
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 79 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
the 2013 COSO (http://www.coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf) perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program . Plan
the testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance
requirement and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of
the compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
2. Determine whether required reports for Federal awards include all activity of the reporting period, are
supported by applicable accounting or performance records, and are fairly presented in accordance with
governing requirements.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
For the ODJFS 2827 / CR 520 report and the Over/Under Report:
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 80 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
ODJFS 02827:
1. Based on the results of the test of controls, select the quarterly ODJFS 2827/ CR 520 reports and perform
the following:
Review each report CR 520 (2827) to determine if:




All amounts reported are traceable to appropriate supporting documentation and appear to be code
properly.
All amounts reported agree to the Quarterly CFIS reconciliation from ODJFS.
All amounts reported agree to the County Auditors/fiscal agents records.
Form 2827/CR 520 was signed by County Auditor/fiscal agent and Director and imported into CFIS Web
no later than the tenth calendar day of the second month following the quarter the report
represents
SSBG Quarterly Summary of Direct Services Provided and Purchases Services Contracts and
Agreements:
Based on the results of the test of controls, select quarterly submissions (previously known as the 4282
report) in the audit period. Auditors will need to have the CDJFS retrieve a copy of the electronic forms for
testing. Review the form to determine if:
— It was submitted to ODJFS in a timely manner (due 45 days after the end of the quarter- use the
electronic submission date).
— It is mathematically accurate, if applicable.
— All amounts and other significant information reported are traceable to appropriate supporting
documentation.
Other
1. Determine if the County/district JFS reviewed the grant reconciliation (over / under) report and responded to
ODJFS.
2. Obtain written representation from management that the reports provided to the auditor are true copies of the
reports submitted or electronically transmitted to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the
case of a subrecipient.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 81 of 92
Part III
L. Reporting
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 82 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
OMB Compliance Requirements
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
OMB Compliance Requirements
(Source: Non-UG Boilerplate)
Note: Transfers of Federal awards to another component of the same auditee under
OMB Circular A-133 do not constitute a subrecipient or vendor relationship.
A pass-through entity is responsible for:

Determining Subrecipient Eligibility - In addition to any programmatic eligibility criteria under E, "Eligibility
for Subrecipients," for subawards made on or after October 1, 2010, determining whether an applicant for
a non-ARRA subaward has provided a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number as part of its subaward application or, if not, before award (2 CFR section 25.110 and Appendix A
to 2 CFR part 25).

Award Identification- At the time of the subaward, identifying to the subrecipient the Federal award
information (i.e., CFDA title and number; award name, and number; if the award is research and
development; and name of Federal awarding agency) and applicable compliance requirements.

During-the-Award Monitoring- Monitoring the subrecipient's use of Federal awards through reporting, site
visits, regular contact, or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers
Federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements
and that performance goals are achieved.

Subrecipient Audits- (1) Ensuring that subrecipients expending $500,000 or more in Federal awards
during the subrecipient's fiscal year for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003 as provided in OMB
Circular A-133 have met the audit requirements of OMB Circular A-133 (the circular is available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a133/a133_revised_2007.pdf) and that the
required audits are completed within 9 months of the end of the subrecipient's audit period; (2) issuing a
management decision on audit findings within 6 months after receipt of the subrecipient's audit report;
and (3) ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate corrective action on all audit findings.
In cases of continued inability or unwillingness of a subrecipient to have the required audits, the passthrough entity shall take appropriate action using sanctions.
Ensuring Accountability of For-Profit Subrecipients - Awards also may be passed through to for-profit
entities. For-profit subrecipients are accountable to the pass-through entity for the use of Federal funds
provided. Because for-profit subrecipients are not subject to the audit requirements of OMB Circular A133, pass-through entities are responsible for establishing requirements, as needed, to ensure for-profit
subrecipient accountability for the use of funds.

Pass-Through Entity Impact- Evaluating the impact of subrecipient activities on the pass-through entity's
ability to comply with applicable Federal regulations.
During-the-Award Monitoring
Following are examples of factors that may affect the nature, timing, and extent of during-the-award monitoring:

Program complexity- Programs with complex compliance requirements have a higher risk of noncompliance.

Percentage passed through- The larger the percentage of program awards passed through the greater
the need for subrecipient monitoring.

Amount of awards- Larger dollar awards are of greater risk.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 83 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
OMB Compliance Requirements

Subrecipient risk- Subrecipients may be evaluated as higher risk or lower risk to determine the need for
closer monitoring. Generally, new subrecipients would require closer monitoring. For existing
subrecipients, based on results of during-the-award monitoring and subrecipient audits, a subrecipient
may warrant closer monitoring [e.g., the subrecipient has (1) a history of non-compliance as either a
recipient or subrecipient, (2) new personnel, or (3) new or substantially changed systems]. Evaluation of
subrecipient risk also may take into consideration the extent of Federal monitoring of subrecipient entities
that also are recipients of prime Federal awards.
Monitoring activities normally occur throughout the year and may take various forms, such as:

Reporting- Reviewing financial and performance reports submitted by the subrecipient.

Site Visits- Performing site visits at the subrecipient to review financial and programmatic records and
observe operations.

Regular Contact- Regular contacts with subrecipients and appropriate inquiries concerning program
activities.
Agreed-upon procedures engagements
A pass-through entity may arrange for agreed-upon procedures engagements for certain aspects of subrecipient
activities, such as eligibility determinations. Since the pass-through entity determines the procedures to be used
and compliance areas to be tested, these agreed-upon procedures engagements enable the pass-through entity
to target the coverage to areas of greatest risk. The costs of agreed-upon procedures engagements is an
allowable cost to the pass-through entity if the agreed-upon procedures are performed for subrecipients below the
A-133 threshold for audit (currently at $500,000 for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003) for the following
types of compliance requirements: activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs/cost principles; eligibility;
matching, level of effort, earmarking; and reporting (OMB Circular A-133 (§ ___.230(b)(2)).
Source of Governing Requirements
The requirements for subrecipient monitoring are contained in 31 USC 7502(f)(2)(B) (Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), A-102 Common Rule (§ ___.37 and § ___.40(a)) (codified in 45
CFR 92 for HHS), program legislation, 2 CFR parts 25 and 170, and 48 CFR parts 4, 42, and 52 Federal
awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 84 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
ODJFS Compliance Requirements
Each county can choose how they would like to use these funds. The projects which are to be funded by
the Social Services Block Grant must be documented in a plan developed by each county. As a result,
each county audit team must obtain and review the county’s plan for this program and inquire with
County Management to determine if disbursements were made to subrecipients during the audit period.
Contracts (whether vendor or subrecipient) are not required to be submitted or approved by ODJFS. Auditors
should review contracts entered into by the County JFS for services to determine if a vendor or subrecipient
relationship exists. Auditors should also look for reoccurring expenditures to determine if such a relationship
exists without entering into a formal contract.
(A) To the extent permitted by section 307.982 of the Revised Code, a board of county commissioners may enter
into a written contract with a private or government entity for the entity to do either or both of the following for the
county’s prevention, retention, and contingency program: (1) Certify eligibility for benefits and services that do not
have a financial need eligibility requirement; (2) Accept applications and determine and verify eligibility for benefits
and services that have a financial need eligibility requirement.
(B) If a board of county commissioners enters into a contract under division (A) of this section with a private or
government entity, the county department of job and family services shall do all of the following: (1) Ensure that
eligibility for benefits and services is certified or determined and verified in accordance with the statement of
policies adopted under section 5108.04 of the Revised Code; (2) Ensure that the private or government entity
maintains all records that are necessary for audits; (3) Monitor the private or government entity for compliance
with Title IV-A, this chapter of the Revised Code, and the statement of policies; (4) Take actions that are
necessary to recover any funds that are not spent in accordance with Title IV-A or this chapter of the Revised
Code.
See OAC 5101:9-1-88 Subrecipient annual risk assessment review and subrecipient monitoring process.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 85 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
1. Obtain an understanding of internal control, assess risk, and test internal control as required by OMB
Circular A-133 §___.500(c). Using the guidance provided in
the 2013 COSO (http://www.coso.org/IC.htm), or GAO’s 2014 Green Book
(http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf) perform procedures to obtain an understanding of internal
control sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk for the program . Plan
the testing of internal control to support a low assessed level of control risk for the compliance
requirement and perform the testing of internal control as planned. If internal control over some or all of
the compliance requirements is likely to be ineffective, see the alternative procedures in §___.500(c)(3) of
OMB Circular A-133, including assessing the control risk at the maximum and considering whether
additional compliance tests and reporting are required because of ineffective internal control. For further
AOS guidance on testing federal controls, see
http://portal/BP/Intranet/AA%20Training%20Fall%202011/FACCR%20Controls%20and%20Federal%20U
pdate.pdf.
2. For non-ARRA first-tier subawards made on or after October 1, 2010, determine whether the passthrough entity had the subrecipient provide a valid DUNS number before issuing the subaward.
3. Determine whether the pass-through entity properly identified Federal award information and compliance
requirements to the subrecipient, and approved only allowable activities in the subaward documents.
4. Determine whether the pass-through entity monitored subrecipient activities to provide reasonable
assurance that the subrecipient administers Federal awards in compliance with Federal requirements.
5. Determine whether the pass-through entity ensured required audits are performed, issued a management
decision on audit findings within six months after receipt of the subrecipient's audit report, and ensures
that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate corrective action on all audit findings.
6. Determine whether in cases of continued inability or unwillingness of a subrecipient to have the required
audits, the pass-through entity took appropriate action using sanctions.
7. Determine whether the pass-through entity evaluates the impact of subrecipient activities on the passthrough entity.
8. Determine whether the pass-through entity identified in the SEFA the total amount provided to
subrecipients from each Federal program.
9. If for-profit subawards are material, determine the adequacy of the pass-through entity's monitoring
procedures for those subawards.
What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link
to documentation or where the testing was performed):
Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and
prevent or identify and correct errors):
Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect
errors):
Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title):
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 86 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
Audit Objectives and Control Procedures
Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Here are considerations that can help in documenting the above control requirements
1. Does the County/district have procedures in place to perform an annual risk assessment review,
considering the following:
 Extent and frequency of the review;
 Type of subrecipient organization;
 Subrecipient’s prior experience;
 Subrecipient’s prior monitoring results;
 Complexity of the program requirements;
 Subrecipient’s organizational stability; and
 Subrecipient’s reporting history
2. Are there risk assessment review mechanisms to identify the following:
 When unallowable activities or costs could be charged to a federal program and be undetected or
misappropriated, or improper disposition of property acquired with federal funds;
 Changes to eligibility determination systems;
 Accuracy of underlying report source data and the validity of the reports;
 Level of management commitment and understanding of federal requirements and regulatory changes;
and
 Various internal changes that may affect performance such as financial problems, loss of personnel and
rapid growth.
.
The ODJFS Guided Self-Assessment (GSA) if used or County/District JFS policies should document
controls for meeting compliance requirements. Auditors should review the information provided by the
County/District JFS to gain an understanding of the procedures in place.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 87 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests)
(Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing):
Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as
the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of
substantive tests of compliance.
Note: The auditor may consider coordinating the tests related to subrecipients performed as part of Cash
management (tests of cash reports submitted by subrecipients), Eligibility (tests that subawards were made only
to eligible subrecipients), and Procurement (tests ensuring that a subrecipients is not suspended or debarred)
with the testing of Subrecipient Monitoring.)
1) Gain an understanding of the pass-through entity’s (County/district’s) subrecipient procedures through a
review of the pass-through entity’s subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures (e.g., annual monitoring
plan) and discussions with staff. This should include an understanding of the scope, frequency, and
timeliness of monitoring activities and the number, size, and complexity of awards to subrecipients.
2) Test award documents and agreements to ascertain if: (a) at the time of award the pass-through entity made
subrecipients aware of the award information (i.e., CFDA title and number; award name and number; if the
award is research and development; and name of Federal awarding agency) and requirements imposed by
laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements; and (b) the activities approved in the
award documents were allowable.
Note: The award document per ODJFS is the subgrant award agreement. Per OAC 5101:9-1-88, for each
grant award passed through to a subrecipient, there will be a subgrant agreement and this subgrant
agreement should be considered as an important tool for monitoring subrecipient activities. This subgrant
agreement is the means by which a grant award of federal financial assistance is issued to a subrecipient.
They generally identify a federal award to a subrecipient that includes a CFDA #, a program name, an award
year, the federal awards entity, and the program services and requirements. A subgrant agreement may
contain identifying information for multiple grant awards being passed through to the same subrecipient.
3) Review the County/district’s documentation of during-the-award monitoring to ascertain if the pass-through
entity’s monitoring provided reasonable assurance that subrecipients used Federal awards for authorized
purposes, complied with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements, and
achieved performance goals.
4) Review the County/district’s follow-up to the subrecipient’s improvement plan on deficiencies noted during the
annual risk assessment review. Subrecipient’s must submit an improvement plan within 60 days from
issuance of the findings.
5. Verify that the County/district:
a) Ensured that the required subrecipient audits were completed. For subrecipients that are not required to
submit a copy of the reporting package to a pass-through entity because there were “no audit findings”
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 88 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance
(Substantive Tests)
(i.e., because the schedule of findings and questioned costs did not disclose audit findings relating to the
Federal awards that the pass-through entity provided and the summary schedule of prior audit findings
did not report the status of audit findings relating to Federal awards that the pass-through entity provided,
as prescribed in OMB Circular A-133 §___.320(e)), the pass-through entity may use the information in the
Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) database (available on the Internet at
http://harvester.census.gov/sac) as evidence to verify that the subrecipient had “no audit findings” and
that the required audit was performed. This FAC verification would be in lieu of reviewing submissions by
the subrecipient to the pass-through entity when there are no audit findings.
b) Issued management decisions on audit findings within 6 months after receipt of the subrecipient’s audit
report.
c) Ensured that subrecipients took appropriate and timely corrective action on all audit findings.
6. Verify that in cases of continued inability or unwillingness of a subrecipient to have the required audits or
follow up on the risk assessment review, the pass-through entity took appropriate action. As noted in the
OAC section above, failure to submit and implement an improvement plan will constitute grounds for contract
or subaward agreement termination.
7) Verify that the effects of subrecipient noncompliance are properly reflected in the pass-through entity’s
records.
8) Verify that the pass-through entity monitored the activities of subrecipients not subject to OMB Circular A-133,
using techniques such as those discussed in the “Compliance Requirements” provisions of this section with
the exception that these subrecipients are not required to have audits under OMB Circular A-133 and the
OAC section noted above.
9) Determine if the pass-through entity has procedures that allow it to identify the total amount provided to
subrecipients from each Federal program.
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 89 of 92
Part III
M. Subrecipient Monitoring
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications Summary
Audit Implications (adequacy of the system and controls, and the effect on sample size, significant
deficiencies / material weaknesses, material non-compliance and management letter comments)
A.
Results of Test of Controls: (including material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and
management letter items)
B.
Assessment of Control Risk:
C.
Effect on the Nature, Timing, and Extent of Compliance (Substantive Test) including Sample Size:
D.
Results of Compliance (Substantive Tests) Tests:
E.
Questioned Costs: Actual __________
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Projected __________
Page 90 of 92
Program Testing Conclusion
Program Testing Conclusion
Auditors should note that while administrative and cost principles of the UG do not apply to non-UG
grants, requirements of subpart F of the UG are applicable for all audits periods beginning on or after
12/26/14, therefore this section has been modified to include certain UG references (where applicable).
We have performed procedures sufficient to provide reasonable assurance for federal award program compliance
requirements (to support our opinions). The procedures performed, relevant evidence obtained, and our
conclusions are adequately documented. (If you are unable to conclude, prepare a memo documenting your
reason and the implications for the engagement, including the audit reports.)
Conclusion
The opinion on this major program should be:
Unmodified:
Modified (describe):
Adverse (describe):
Disclaimer (describe):
Per paragraph 23.38 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits, the
following are required to be reported as audit findings in the federal awards section of the schedule of findings
and questioned costs (see 2CFR200 section 516):








Significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over major programs
Material noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts and grant agreements
related to major programs
Known questioned costs that are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance requirement for a major
program. The auditor also should report (in the schedule of findings and questioned costs) known
questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000 for a type of compliance
requirement for a major program.
Known questioned costs that are greater than $25,000 for programs that are not audited as major.
The circumstances concerning why the auditor's report on compliance for major programs is other than an
unmodified opinion, unless such circumstances are otherwise reported as audit findings in the schedule of
findings and questioned costs for federal awards (for example, a scope limitation that is not otherwise
reported as a finding).
Known fraud affecting a federal award, unless such fraud is otherwise reported as an audit finding in the
schedule of findings and questioned costs for federal awards.
Significant instances of abuse relating to major programs
Instances in which the results of audit follow-up procedures disclosed that the summary schedule of prior
audit findings prepared by the auditee in accordance with Section 200.511(b) of the Uniform Guidance,
materially misrepresents the status of any prior audit finding.
The A-102 Common Rule
A-102 Common Rule applies to State & Local Governments. Use the following convention to refer to the federal
agency codification of the A-102 Common Rule: (A-102 Common Rule: §___.36). Auditors should replace the
“§___” with the applicable numeric reference.
Appendix II of the OMB Compliance Supplement identifies each agency’s codification of the A-102
Common Rule. If a citation is warranted, auditors should look up where the federal awarding agency
codified the A-102 Common Rule. For example, a Cash Management citation for a U.S. Department of
Education grant would cite 34 CFR 80.21 (34 CFR 80 coming from Appendix II of the OMB Compliance
Supplement, and .21 coming from Section C below, Source of Governing Requirements for A-102
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 91 of 92
Program Testing Conclusion
Common Rule entities. There are other “sources of governing requirements” noted in each section as well, this
is just an explanation for the A-102 Common Rule references.
Appendix I of the OMB Compliance Supplement includes a list of programs excluded from the requirements of the
A-102 Common Rule
(Source: AOS CFAE)
Cross-reference to internal control matters (significant deficiencies or material weaknesses), if
any, documented in the FACCR:
Cross-reference to questioned costs and matter of noncompliance, if any, documented in this
FACCR:
Per paragraph 23.45 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits, the
schedule of findings and questioned costs should include all audit findings required to be reported under the
Uniform Guidance. A separate written communication (such as a communication sometimes referred to as a
management letter) may not be used to communicate such matters to the auditee in lieu of reporting them as
audit findings in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. See the discussion beginning at paragraph 23.33 for
information on Uniform Guidance requirements for the schedule of findings and questioned costs. If there are
other matters that do not meet the Uniform Guidance requirements for reporting but, in the auditor's judgment,
warrant the attention those charged with governance, they should be communicated in writing or orally. If such a
communication is provided in writing to the auditee, there is no requirement for that communication to be
referenced in the Uniform Guidance compliance report. Per table, 23-2 a matter must meet the following in
order to be communicated in the management letter:




Other deficiencies in internal control over compliance that are not significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses required to be reported but, in the auditor's judgment, are of sufficient importance to be
communicated to management.
Noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations or terms and conditions of federal awards related to a major
program that does not meet the criteria for reporting under the Uniform Guidance but, in the auditor's
judgment, is of sufficient importance to communicate to management or those charged with governance.
Abuse that is less than material to a major program and not otherwise required to be reported but that, in the
auditor's judgment, is of sufficient importance to communicate to the auditee.
Other findings or issues arising from the compliance audit that are not otherwise required to be reported but
are, in the auditor's professional judgment, significant and relevant to those charged with governance.
Cross-reference to any Management Letter items and explain why not included in the Single Audit
Report:
SSBG CFDA 93.667
Page 92 of 92