Finite Reinsurance - Where’s the Risk? David Molyneux, FCAS, MAAA PartnerRe New Solutions Inc. March 11-12, 2004 2 Topics Finite Reinsurance Basics Risk Transfer & Accounting Treatment Trends 3 Finite Basics – Buyer’s Perspective Smooth Earnings & Reduce Volatility Capital/Surplus Management M&A Tax Management Balance Sheet Optimization BCAR Cost Efficiency 4 Finite Basics - Seller’s Perspective Motivation behind transaction is not primarily Risk Transfer Defined maximum limit Good balance between upside and downside 5 Finite Structures LPT/Adverse Development Covers Aggregate Stop Loss Finite Quota Share Multi-Year Funding 6 Finite Reinsurance - Deal Features Highly Structured Profit Sharing Defined Limit Multi-Year Additional premiums to offset adverse experience Optionality Funds Withheld or Funds Transferred Explicit recognition of Investment Income 7 Concern Over Finite Post Enron – more concern over Balance Sheet Integrity Finite Explicit Recognition of Invest Income – in line with the true underlying economics of insurance Reducing Volatility - same goal as traditional reinsurance De-leveraging Capital – can be more cost effective than CM 8 Accounting Treatment & Measuring Risk FASB 113 Qualifying for Reinsurance Accounting Treatment: “It is reasonably possible that the reinsurer may realize a significant loss from the transaction.” Significant Loss “… based on present value of all cash flows between the ceding and assuming enterprises….” , “… same interest rate shall be used to determine present value of cash flows…” Reasonably Possible No explicit guidance given for determining what is “reasonably possible” 9 Accounting Treatment & Measuring Risk In Practice Scenario Approach Rules of Thumb - “10/10 Rule” Loss Measurement Cash flows excluding brokerage, expenses, taxes Single discount rate versus yield curve Probability Measurement Variety of approaches 10 “10/10 Rule” Defining a 10% Loss • Loss at 90th Percentile • Average Loss between 90-100th Percentile 11 “10/10 Rule” Defining a 10% Probability Past Practice • Subjective Measurement/Scenario Approach Current Practice • More Technical Modeling • On-level Loss Distributions • Payout Patterns/Variability 12 Issues – Finite Quota Share FASB 113 2nd Test – reinsurer must assume “significant insurance risk under the reinsured portions of underlying contracts….” ; there must be “variation in amount or timing of payments…”; no delay in timely reimbursement Substantially all the risk exception Caps Loss Corridors Slides Materiality 13 Issues - Aggregate Stop Loss “In the Money” Covers Multi-Year Appropriate Interest Crediting Rate for FW 14 Issues - LPT/ADC Rating Agency Scrutiny AM Best gives credit for XS of Discounted Carried Appropriate Interest Crediting Rate for FW 15 Current Environment More Scrutiny from Regulators, Auditors & Rating Agencies Lack of Uniformity in Measuring Risk “Changing Face of Finite” More Risk built into Structures Higher Cost Development of New Products