AY 2014-2015 ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW SELF-STUDY TEMPLATE
Reporting School/College: St. John’s College
Program Reviewed: History DA Q
Date Submitted to Department/Division Chair:
Overview and Program Review Summary: Please summarize this program’s mission and its relationship to the vision
and mission of St. John’s University, and the program’s School/College. Identify similar programs regionally and
nationally and distinguish this program from them. In addition, summarize your findings as they relate to (1) program
quality, (2) market growth potential, and (3) student learning. Also, summarize any significant changes, achievements
(by faculty and students and the program itself), and plans for the future. Finally, based on the information gleaned
from the data in the self-study, give an overall rating of the program’s Enrollment/Market Potential by categorizing it as
one of the following: (1) Enhance; (2) Maintain; (3) Reduce support, Phase out, Consolidate, or Discontinue.
(Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 1. The purpose of the program reflects and supports the strategic vision and mission of St. John’s
University, and the program’s School/College.
1a.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the Catholic, Vincentian, and
metropolitan identity of St. John’s University? www.stjohns.edu/about/out-mission. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
1b.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the University’s vision.
www.stjohns.edu/about/out-mission/vision-statement. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
1c.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the vision and mission of the
program’s School/College? (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 1.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Self-Study Template 1
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
STANDARD 2. The program attracts, retains, and graduates high quality students.
2a.
Undergraduate SAT and High School Average
2b.
Undergraduate 1st Year Retention Rate
2c.
Undergraduate 6 Year Graduation Rate
2d.
Graduate Standardized Test Scores
Fall
2005
2006
2007
2008
500/490
2009
Program
380/705
593/600
School/College
Average Rate
481/561
494/569
465/551
501/588
472/577
Regional
Comparison
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
See below
National
Comparison
New Graduate Students GRE
Verbal
Mean Scores
Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
Ir Grev
Score
Modern World
History
DA
old
660
Ir Grev
Score
460
Ir Grev
Score
405
Ir Grev
Score
680
new
151
Self-Study Template 2
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
New Graduate Students GRE Quantitative
Mean Scores
Fall 2010
Ir Greq
Score
Modern World History
DA
old
Fall 2011
Ir Greq
Score
760
Fall 2012
Ir Greq
Score
480
Fall 2013
Ir Greq Score
445
550
new
144
As of August 1, 2011, ETS revised the GRE General Test with a new scoring scale. Prior to
8/1/11 on a scale of 200-800(old) and after 8/1/11 on a scale of 130-170(new)
Based on students with valid scores in BANNER - therefore n maybe small in some cases.
New Graduate Students GRE Verbal
Mean Scores
Fall
Fall
2010
2011
2012
Ir Grev
Score
Ir Grev
Score
Ir Grev
Score
Graduate School Arts & Sci
old
Fall
2013
Fall
491
500
new
Ir Grev
Score
497
532
154
153
New Graduate Students GRE Quantitative
Mean Scores
Fall
2010
Fall
2011
Fall
2012
Fall
2013
Ir Greq Ir Greq Ir Greq Ir Greq
Score Score Score Score
Graduate School Arts & Sci
old
new
585
566
593
604
149
150
As of August 1, 2011, ETS revised the GRE General Test with a new scoring scale. Prior to 8/1/11 on a scale of 200-800(old) and after 8/1/11 on a
scale of 130-170(new)
Comments: Refer to Charts 2a – 2d in your response. (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
2e.
Please describe how the program compares with peer and aspirational institutions.
(Suggested limit 1/2 page)
Self-Study Template 3
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
2f.
If applicable, describe the program’s student performance over the past five years on licensure or professional
certification exams relative to regional and national standards. (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
2g.
Number of majors and minors enrolled over the past five years. See table below.
Fall
Number of Students
SJC-GR
2006
2007
2008
2009
Majors
31
27
26
34
32
Minors
0
0
0
0
0
Total
31
27
26
34
32
MAJORS
2h.
2005
HIS2
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Majors
Majors
DA
35
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
Majors
30
Majors
37
44
Number of degrees granted during the past five years. See table below.
Academic Year
Degrees
Granted
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
DA
4
4
4
1
5
HIS2
Modern World History
DA
10/11
11/12
12/13
Degrees Conferred
Degrees Conferred
Degrees Conferred
5
2
Self-Study Template 4
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
3
Below is comparison degrees conferred data for local and national institutions based on data retrieved from the IPEDS
website. This is based on the Classification of Instructional Program (CIP) Code of 54-History.
20092010
20102011
20112012
Doctorate
Local
41
43
44
National
888
908
969
1
Local institution include: Adelphi University, Columbia University, CUNY Queens College, Fordham University,
Hofstra University, Iona College, C.W. Post University, Manhattan College, New York University, Pace University,
Seton Hall University, Stony Brook University, and Wagner College.
Comments : Based on the data in 2g and 2h, how do these trends compare to institutional, regional and national
patterns? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
2i.
What mechanisms are in place to monitor students’ progress toward degree? And, to what extent is there a
collaborative effort to provide quality advising and support services to students? (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
2j.
If available, provide information on the success of graduates in this program as it relates to employment or
attending graduate school. (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
Self-Study Template 5
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
2k.
Please comment on the students’ competencies in the program. Support your response using data provided
below and any other data available. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 2.
Additional comments if needed: (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 3. The program engages in ongoing systematic planning that is aligned with the University and
School/College planning, direction, and priorities.
3a.
How does your program’s strategic goal/objectives link to your School/College plan and the University’s strategic
plan? http://www.stjohns.edu/about/leadership/strategic-planning
3b.
What is the evidence of monitoring the external and internal environments, specifically what are the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the program? How were they identified? What actions have been taken
in response to these findings? What characteristics of the program suggest a competitive edge against other programs
regionally and nationally?
Self-Study Template 6
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
3c.
What is the current and future market demand for the program? Support your response using the data
provided below or any other internal or external sources to justify your response.
Standard 3.
Additional comments if needed: (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 4. The program provides a high quality curriculum that emphasizes and assesses student learning and
engagement.
4a.
Please indicate how the program curriculum is in alignment with the following three items:
(Suggested limit 1/2 page for each of the three categories below)
1. Standards within the discipline
2. Curriculum integrity, coherence, academic internships, teaching excellence, teaching vibrancy, and study
abroad experiences.
3. The University Core competencies
4b.
The syllabi for the courses within this program incorporate the suggested elements of a syllabus – an example of
which can be found at the following St. John’s University Center for Teaching and Learning link. (Suggested limit 1/3
page) http://stjohns.campusguides.com/content.php?pid=71651&sid=984766
4c.
Describe the assessment model currently in place for the program and indicate the extent to which disciplinary
and core knowledge, competence, and values are met, as well as findings and action plans for improvement. For
reference, visit WeaveOnline – https://app.weaveonline.com//login.aspx; Digication – https://stjohns.digication.com
(Suggested limit 1/2 page)
4d.
What, if any, external validations, e.g. specialized accreditations, external awards, other validations of quality
has the program received? (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 4.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Self-Study Template 7
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
STANDARD 5. The program has the faculty resources required to meet its mission and goals.
5a.
Below you will find the number of students enrolled as majors and minors in the program. Please complete the
table by adding the number of full-time faculty assigned to the program. Then calculate the student to full-time faculty
ratio.
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
# Majors/
FT Faculty
FT
PT
Total
Majors
5
26
31
Minors
FT
PT
2
Fall 2007
Total
25
27
0
Majors
& Minors
Combined
5
26
# of FTE
Students
(Majors &
Minors)
5.00
8.67
# of FTE
Faculty
assigned
to the
program
12
PT
3
Total
23
FT
26
0
PT
5
Fall 2009
Total
29
FT
34
0
PT
12
Total
20
32
0
0
31
2
25
27
3
23
26
5
29
34
12
20
32
13.67
2.00
8.33
10.33
3.00
7.67
10.67
5.00
9.67
14.67
12.00
6.67
18.67
12
FTE
Student/
FTE
Faculty
Ratio
FT
Fall 2008
12
12
1.14
15
15
0.86
Fall 2010
15
15
0.71
16
16
0.98
Fall 2011
1.17
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
MAJORS
12
23
35
10
20
30
11
26
37
13
31
44
Self-Study Template 8
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
Fall 2010
Total
FTE MAJORS
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
F
P
Total
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
12
7.667 19.667
10
6.667 16.667
Fall 2010
11
8.667 19.667
13
10.333 23.333
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
# of FTE faculty assigned to the
program
FTE Student/FTE Faculty Ratio
Important Notes:
FTE Students = Number of FT Students + (number of PT Students/3)
FTE Faculty = Number of FT Faculty + (number of PT Faculty/3)
This methodology is used by STJ for all external reporting.
5b.
Below you will find the credit hours the department has delivered by full-time faculty and part-time faculty
(including administrators) and the total credit hours consumed by non-majors.
Credit Hours
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
2091
44%
2454
56%
2427
51%
3111
65%
3708
76%
PT Faculty
2646
56%
1953
44%
2313
49%
1650
35%
1194
24%
Total
4737
100%
4407
100%
4740
100%
4761
100%
4902
100%
Taught
FT Faculty
% consumed by
Non-Majors
82%
82%
79%
77%
78%
Self-Study Template 9
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
Credit Hrs Taught
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
F-T Faculty
2,890
54.9%
2,784
50.3%
P-T Faculty (inc
Admin)
2,373
45.1%
2,748
49.7%
0.0%
Total
% Consumed by
Non-Majors
5,263
4,163
100%
79.1%
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
2,282
42.9%
1,860
39.9%
3,042
57.1%
2,799
60.1%
0.0%
5,532
4,443
100%
80.3%
Fall 2013
0.0%
5,324
4,332
100%
81.4%
0.0%
4,659
100%
3,633
78.0%
5c.
Below you will find the number of courses the department has delivered by full-time faculty and part-time
faculty (including administrators).
Courses
Taught
Fall 2005
#
%
Fall 2006
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
39
62%
44
59%
50
71%
54
79%
FT Faculty
29
52%
PT Faculty
27
48%
24
38%
30
41%
20
29%
14
21%
Total
56
100%
63
100%
74
100%
70
100%
68
100%
Self-Study Template 10
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
Courses Taught
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
F-T Faculty
42
62.7%
34
79.1%
P-T Faculty (inc Admin)
25
37.3%
9
20.9%
0.0%
Total
67
100%
Number
Percent
Number
40
52.6%
34
50.7%
36
47.4%
33
49.3%
0.0%
43
100%
Fall 2013
0.0%
76
100%
Percent
0.0%
67
100%
5d.
What is the representative nature of faculty in terms of demographics, tenure and diversity? (See departmental
information on next page). How well does this support the program? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
Departmental Data
Self-Study Template 11
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
2005
FT
2006
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
Male
12
80%
15
94%
Female
3
20%
1
Total
15
100%
Black
1
Hispanic
FT
2007
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
27
13
72%
13
93%
6%
4
5
28%
1
16
100%
31
18
100%
7%
0
0%
1
2
1
7%
1
6%
2
Asian
1
7%
0
0%
White
10
67%
15
Unknown
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Tenured
10
Tenure-Track
FT
2008
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
26
11
61%
13
87%
7%
6
7
39%
2
14
100%
32
18
100%
11%
0
0%
2
1
1
6%
0
0%
1
1
1
6%
0
0%
94%
25
13
72%
13
0
0%
2
1
6%
16
100%
31
18
100%
67%
10
11
4
27%
4
Not Applicable
1
7%
Total
15
100%
FT
2009
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
24
12
60%
1
2
92%
13%
9
8
40%
1
15
100%
33
20
100%
6%
1
7%
2
2
1
6%
0
0%
1
1
1
6%
0
0%
93%
26
13
72%
13
1
7%
2
2
11%
14
100%
32
18
100%
61%
11
12
4
22%
4
1
3
17%
15
18
100%
FT
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
24
12
63%
9
100%
21
8%
9
7
37%
0
0%
7
1
3
100%
33
19
100%
9
100%
28
10%
2
15%
4
2
11%
2
22%
4
1
5%
0
0%
1
2
11%
0
0%
2
1
2
10%
0
0%
2
0
0%
0
0%
0
87%
26
13
65%
9
69%
22
13
68%
7
78%
20
1
7%
3
2
10%
2
15%
4
2
11%
0
0%
2
15
100%
33
20
100%
1
3
100%
33
19
100%
9
100%
28
67%
12
12
60%
12
12
63%
12
3
17%
3
5
25%
5
5
26%
5
3
3
17%
3
3
15%
3
2
11%
2
18
18
100%
18
20
100%
20
19
100%
19
Gender
Ethnicity
Tenure Status
Self-Study Template 12
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
2010
FT
2011
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
Male
8
47%
10
83%
Female
9
53%
2
17%
Total
17
FT
2012
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
18
9
50%
13
87%
11
9
50%
2
13%
29
18
25%
4
1
6%
2
FT
2013
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
22
8
47%
17
89%
11
9
53%
2
11%
33
17
13%
3
1
6%
FT
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
25
8
47%
16
80%
24
11
9
53%
4
20%
13
36
17
Gender
12
15
19
20
37
Ethnicity
Black
1
6%
Hispanic
2
12%
0%
2
2
11%
1
7%
3
2
12%
Asian
1
6%
0%
1
1
6%
1
7%
2
1
6%
0%
0%
0
0%
0
75%
20
73%
23
American
Indian/Alaskan Native
White
11
65%
3
9
0%
12
67%
11
2 or More Races
3
3
0%
12
71%
1
0%
12
16%
4
0%
2
16%
4
0%
0
63%
24
0%
3
15%
3
3
18%
0
0%
3
1
6%
1
5%
2
0%
0
0%
0
11
65%
16
80%
27
2
0%
0
0%
2
0
0%
0
0
0%
0
Native
Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander
Unknown
2
Total
17
12%
0%
12
2
2
29
18
11%
0%
15
2
0%
33
17
1
19
5%
1
0%
36
17
20
37
Tenure Status
Tenured
9
53%
9
11
61%
11
10
59%
10
10
59%
10
Tenure-Track
6
35%
6
5
28%
5
7
41%
7
7
41%
7
Not Applicable
2
12%
2
2
11%
2
0%
0
0%
0
Total
17
17
18
18
17
17
17
17
Self-Study Template 13
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
5e.
What evidence exists that the program’s faculty have engaged in research and scholarship on teaching and/or
learning in the program’s field of study? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
5f.
What initiatives have been taken in the past five years to promote faculty development in support of the
program? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
5g.
The table below shows the amount of external funding received by the department. If available, please provide
the dollar amount of externally funded research for full-time faculty supporting the program under review. (Program
dollar amounts are available through departmental records.)
External
Funding
Fiscal Year
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
99,854
28,000
18,000
33,350
08/09
$ Amount
Program
$ Amount
Department
Fiscal Year
External
Funding
09/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
$ Amount
Program
$ Amount
Department
10,000
7,353
30,800
2,955
Self-Study Template 14
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
5h.
Please comment on the table below that shows trends in overall course evaluation and instructional vibrancy for
your program (if available), your college and the university. (Suggested limit ½ page)
Overall Evaluation (Spring)
2011
2012
2013
Instructional Vibrancy (Spring)
2011
2012
2013
4.24
4.15
4.06
4.54
4.43
4.31
3.95
4.01
4.00
4.28
4.33
4.33
4.01
3.21
4.07
4.27
4.29
4.35
History (Q)
Saint John’s
College
Total
Undergraduate
Note: Institutional Vibrancy is the average of the first 14 questions on the course evaluation, with questions pertaining
to course organization, communication, faculty-student interaction, and assignments/grading. All course evaluation
questions range from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
5i.
What percentage of full time faculty assigned to this program have terminal degrees or industry certifications
renewed within the past 2 years? Comment. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 5.
Comments: Indicate to what extent the program has the faculty resources required to meet its mission
and goals. Include references from 5a – 5i. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Standard 5.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 6. The program has adequate resources to meet its goals and objectives. And, it is cost-effective.
6a.
Narrative/Supportive Technological Environment - Comment on classrooms and labs meeting industry-standards
for quality and availability of hardware, software, and peripherals; library space, holdings and services; science
laboratories, TV studios, art/computer graphic labs; etc. (Suggested limit 1 page)
6b.
Narrative/ Supportive Physical Environment - Comment on level of faculty and student satisfaction with HVAC;
faculty and student satisfaction with classroom lighting, crowdedness, and acoustics; flexible teaching environments,
and faculty offices, etc.. (Suggested limit 1 page)
6c.
To what extent has the University funded major capital projects, e.g., renovations, which are linked directly to
the program during the past five years? (Bulleted list)
Self-Study Template 15
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q
6d.
If external data that describes the cost effectiveness of the program has been provided by your School/College
Dean, please comment on the program’s cost-effectiveness. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Standard 6.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 7. Effective actions have been taken based on the findings of the last program review and plans have
been initiated for the future.
Comments: (Suggested limit 1page)
Self-Study Template 16
LAS_HIS_HIST_DA_Q