CAS: Risk and Capital Management Seminar
July 29, 2003
Washington, D.C
Claus S. Metzner, FSA, FCAS, MAAA, Aktuar-SAV
EPIC Actuaries, LLC
What is ERM?
Is it a Tool?
Is it a Theory?
Is it a way of Managing?
Is it a Benefit?
Is it a Fad?
What is ERM?
ERM is:
Focusing on all risks
Financial risks
Operating risks
Developing appropriate risk constraints
Including checks and balances
Assessing risk/return trade-offs
Assuring the enterprise is operating within the predetermined risk constraints
What is ERM?
ERM is Not
Modeling
Models can be very helpful in quantification of trade-offs
Models can be very helpful in developing a “base case”
Bureaucratic
Stifling
Extreme Events
What are they
Severity/frequency
Maximum Possible Loss
How defined
Severity/frequency
Price Adequacy
Long term/short term
Balance Sheet “Honesty”
Risk Appetite
Level of assessment: Firm wide or subsets?
% of Earnings?
% of Revenue
% of Capital
What fluctuation is “tolerable”
What fluctuation is “unacceptable”
RAROC
Risk adjusted return on capital
Is ERM prospective
What is the relevant time frame?
Does the time frame vary for different risks?
Pricing risk
Reserving risk
Reputation risk
Considerations
When do we know something
How long before we can take corrective actions
Asset Risk
Liability Risk (including future business)
Capital
Operating Risks/Constraints
People and processes are important
Consider: ERM views the enterprise as a going concern
What are the implications?
Capital is not just balance sheet capital
Capital includes the franchise value
Balance sheet capital (and economic capital) are important since they serve as possible constraints (insolvency has consequences!)
ERM Open Issues
Asset Risks
Current models are tested, in existence
Current models seem to work
Current models can provide some operating metrics, e.g. Value at Risk
Cautionary Notes
Remember the LTC debacle
Who anticipated the drop in equity prices?
ERM Open Issues
Liability Risks
Models exist to develop maximum possible loss (e.g. earthquake, hurricanes) and distribution of outcomes for a portfolio of risks
Output of models is relevant only if appropriate risk control measures are in place (e.g. operational risk management must be in place and effective)
ERM Open Issues
Liability Risks (continued)
Models need to consider risks associated with realizing the value of good will
Reputation risk
Dynamic responses to pricing/underwriting initiatives
Responses by customers
Responses by competitors
Political responses
ERM Open Issues
Operational Risk – People and Processes
Internal perspective
Underwriting
Claims
Pricing
Marketing
Auditing (general financial discipline)
Etc, etc
ERM Open Issues
Operational Risk – People and Processes
External Perspective
Response of market to internal initiatives
Customers
Competitors
Response of rating agencies
Response of shareholders (publicly traded companies)
Response of regulators
Response of Legislators
Enterprise Risk Management: Benefit or Fad?
Answer depends on
How well the liability risks and the operational risks are addressed
Consider – we may need to develop day to day operational metrics
Quantification (modeling) comes after, not before, we understand the risks
Holistic view of the risk management process
(RAROC)
Many tools are available, but these appear to not yet be integrated into a cohesive risk management program
Enterprise Risk Management: Benefit or Fad?
Considerations for Improvements
Develop Operational Risk Assessment
Function of Management
Co-operative Effort across all disciplines
Develop Operational Risk Management Tools
Some exist (e.g. underwriting guidelines, etc.)
Develop an Actuarial Control Cycle
How do we know if experience is consistent with assumptions
When do we know
How do we bring information forward to foster adjustment to new reality
Enterprise Risk Management: Benefit or Fad?
Let’s take a vote
How many believe it is a benefit?
How many believe it is a fad?