KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Diabetes Control: Goals and reality – European perspective Thomas Danne Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Agenda • Targets are important • We don´t need age-dependent or „individual“ targets • No phases of diabetes have less risk for late complications • It is feasible to reach target HbA1c < 7.5% for half of the children with diabetes with access to intensive insulin treatment • Is HbA1c the right target ? KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Plasma blood glucose and A1C goals for type 1 diabetes by age group Values by age Before meals Bedtime/overnight A1C Rationale Toddlers and preschoolers (<6 years) 100–180 110–200 <8.5 (but >7.5) High risk and vulnerability to hypoglycemia School age (6–12 years) 90–180 100–180 <8% Risks of hypoglycemia and relatively low risk of complications prior to puberty Adolescents and young adults (13–19 years) 90–130 90–150 <7.5%* Risk of hypoglycemia• Developmental and psychological issues Key concepts in setting glycemic goals: • Goals should be individualized and lower goals may be reasonable based on benefit–risk assessment • Blood glucose goals should be higher than those listed above in children with frequent hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness • Postprandial blood glucose values should be measured when there is a disparity between preprandial blood glucose values and A1C levels Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, Plotnick L, Kaufman F, Laffel L, Deeb L, Grey M, Anderson B, Holzmeister LA, Clark N; American Diabetes Association. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28(1):186-212. KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus SWEDEN: A change in HbA1c reference affects metabolic control: Targets are important ! Data from 49 patients born 1971-1989 Mono S HbA1c, % HPLC DCA 2000 DCCT calibration DCA 2000 Swedish calibration 9.5 9.0 1.4% diff. 8.5 8.0 7.5 1.1% diff. 7.0 p=n.s p=0.04 p=n.s (significance vs. year before change) 6.5 6.0 p=n.s p=0.003 p=0.01 5.5 N = 13 14 17 12 17 18 17 20 19 20 23 22 32 32 29 27 36 38 37 32 39 41 41 37 39 44 42 39 42 44 38 35 41 36 35 40 40 42 38 37 36 40 33 33 33 40 36 32 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Hanas R. Psychological impact of changing the scale of reported HbA1c results affects metabolic control. Diabetes Care 2002;25:2110-1. 00 01 Years KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Hvidore-Adolescent-Study 2008 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Children’s Hospital, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom Clinique Pédiatrique, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia Barn- och ungdomskliniken, Universitetssjukhuset Södra Grev Rosengatan Sweden IJsselland ziekenhuis, The Netherlands Endocrinology and Diabetes Research Group, Hospital de Cruces, Spain Clinica Pediatrica, Ospedale Policlinico, Italy The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada Diabetes-Zentrum, Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult, Germany Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola Diabetology Clinic, Belgium Department of Paediatrics Trinity College, National Childrens Hospital , Ireland Peijas Hospital, Finland Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, USA Pediatric Clinic, Medical Faculty Department of Endocrinology & Genetics, Republic of Macedonia Paediatric Dept. L, Glostrup University Hospital, Denmark Dept. of Pediatrics, Haukeland Hospital, Norway National Center of Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, Scotland University Childrens Hospital, Zurich , Switzerland Department of Paediatrics, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Centro di Diabetologia, University of Parma, Italy Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Australia NovoNordisk, Denmark KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Hvidore-Adolescent-Study 2008 • 2,269 potential study patients visited outpatient department during recruitment phase • 2062 (91%) adolescents filled out the questionnaire • 2036 (90%) gave a sample for a central HbA1c determination • age 14.4 ±2.3 years; • 50.6% male; • Diabetes duration 6.1± 3.5 years • mean HbA1c = 8.2% ± 1.4 • significant differences between centers (F = 12.3; p<0.001) • Center average HbA1c ranged between 7.4 to 9.3% • 152 diabetes-professionals answered the tam questionnaire (pediatric diabetologists (46%) and diabetes nurse educators (32%) • of 21 centres 6 had no dietitian, 11 had no psychosocial team member, while 3 centers had a psychologist/psychiater and social worker a part of their team. adjusted HbA1c (%) target HbA1c of teammembers Team-Target and HbA1c KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% no target 8.0 – 9.0 % 7.5 – 7.9% 7.0 – 7.4% < 7.0 1 8 10 9 2 3 3 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 7 6 10 10 5 5 7 7 9 6 9 8 5 mean HbA1c of adolescents in center (adjusted for age, diabetes duration and gender): 8,8 8,0 8 7 7,7 7,4 7,6 8,0 8,1 8,2 8,2 8,2 8,3 9,1 8,8 8,8 8,4 8,4 2 3 Hvidore Group (2008) submitted 7,7 7,8 7,9 225 125 90 125 175 175 225 30 125 50 225 225 225 225 70 90 225 175 175 175 125 1 Number of team members answering 9,0 8,6 8.2 ± 1.4 % Center number 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Number of adolescents in treated in center Center number KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Team Member Targets & Glycaemic Control <7.0 7-7.4 7.5-7.9 8-9.0 No specific Target Centre Mean HbA1c 100.0 7.40 100.0 20.0 7.58 7.68 7.74 7.80 7.89 8.00 16.7 52.4 33.3 20.0 40. 100.0 83.3 42.9 100. 100.0 60.0 40.0 44.4 60.0 60.0 80.0 20.0 33.3 20.0 40.0 57.1 4.8 42.9 20.0 20.0 8.02 8.08 8.18 8.23 8.24 8.27 8.36 60.0 8.45 8.59 75.0 60.0 22.2 100.0 25.0 20.0 8.76 8.82 8.83 8.98 60.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 22.2 20.0 20.0 20.0 44.4 10.0 10.0 20.0 9.05 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Relationship between targets of parents and adolescents and achieved HbA1c <7.0 7.0-7.4 7.5-7.9 8.0 – 9.0 Don´t know N meanl SD 975 713 205 25 47 7.9 8.4 8.8 8.9 8.1 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.6 N meanl SD 639 691 473 141 13 7.4 8.1 8.6 9.6 10.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.1 N mean SD 1056 627 189 18 31 7.9 8.3 8.9 8.9 8.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.3 N mean SD 600 694 466 127 18 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.6 10.6 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 2.0 target adolescent ideal adolescent happy parents ideal parents happy KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Multiple Regressionsanalysis proves the role of targets and team interaction for center differences Beta t p Beta t p Age .069 3.077 .002 .041 2.025 .043 Gender -.054 -2.517 .012 -.060 -3.136 .002 Diabetes Dration .123 5.432 .000 .066 3.236 .001 Insulin dose (Units/kg) .139 6.414 .000 .090 4.627 .000 Insulin Regimen (BD Freemix) .050 2.247 .025 .047 2.362 .018 Center rank .337 15.251 .000 .164 7.596 .000 Step 1 Step 2 Adolescent Target “happy with” .298 11.910 .000 Parents Target “happy with” .244 10.339 .000 Adolescent Target “Ideal” -.060 -2.757 .006 Team Target - coherent -.096 -2.728 .006 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Hvidore-Group 2008 • A lower target HbA1c and a bigger consistency between team members within a center is associated with a lower average center HbA1c. • Clear and consistent setting of targets is associated with the Outcome in adolescents with diabetes. • Differences in treatment targets are an important factor contributing to center differences KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Influencing Microangiopathy Through Lowering The HbA1c In Randomised Studies Parameter DCCT Kummamoto UKPDS Type of Diabetes Number of patients 1 1441 „1,5“ 110 2 3867 Follow-up (years) 6,5 6 10 HbA1c-change 9,1->7,2 9,1->7,0 7,9->7,0 4 (3-11) 5 (4-19) 10 (6-50) NNTDuration of study (95% CI) Progress. Retinopathy Progress. Nephropathy Progress. Neuropathy 5 (4-7) 7 (6-11) 5 (4-7) 5 (3-16) KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Rate of Background-Retinopathy (per 100 patient-years) Berlin Retinopathy-Study (1977-94): Continuous Exponential Relationship between retinopathy and long-term-HbA1c Virtually all children with diabetes from West-Berlin 10 8 6 N= 494, 262 boys, 232 girls 4 Median age at onset: 11 (1 to 17) years 2 Annual fluoresceine angiograms 0 <7 7-8 Danne et. al, Diab Care 17: 1390-96, 1994 8-9 9-10 10-11 > 11 Average HbA1c (%) Median follow-up: 9 years KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Should risk of severe hypoglycemia influence the targets in young children ? KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Maternal fear of Hypoglycemia in their Children with Insulin dependent Diabetes mellitus Clarke et al.; JPEM 11 (Suppl.1): 189-194, 1998 Average Hypoglycaemia Fear Score Adults with diabetes n=78 1.88 ± 0.6 0.001 Parents of IDDM children n=46 2.94 ± 0.6 n=31 2.84 ± 0.6 (mean age 8.1 years) - without severe hypo 0.040 - with severe hypo n=15 3.18 ± 0.6 No influence: confidence to detect or treat hypoglycaemia in their children KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Can my child die during a hypoglycaemia ? The „dead in bed syndrome“ Sudden death of young people with diabetes without complications found „dead in bed“ out of apparent health the day before. Hypoglycaemia as a possible cause. Author Study period Tattersall (1991) 1989 Thodarson (1995) 1981-90 Sartor (1995) 1977-85 Age Group Total (years) deaths 0 - 40 0 - 28 Dead in bed (n) Age (years) - 22 12 - 43 240 16 7 - 35 33 9 15 - 23 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Why do children with diabetes die ? ca. 150600 Children w. Diabetes (0 to 19 years) 116 deaths 33 deaths not related to DM 83 deaths related to DM 45 in hospital during DKA therapy 26 at home (9 „dead in bed“) 8 on way to hospital 4 hypoglycemia 10 DKA possible Causes of death in children with insulin dependent diabetes 1990-96 10 DKA likely KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Influence of social factors on the mortality of adults with type 1 diabetes 800 Patients with type 1 diabetes (Follow-up 8.4 years) Risk factor Odds Ratio (95% CI) Low social status 1.34 (0.61-2.96) Left school before age 16 y 3.98 (1.96-8.06) social housing 2.57 (1.37-4.91) unemployed 3.10 (1.67-5.79) Robinson N. et. al.: Social Deprivation and Mortality in Adults with Diabetes Mellitus. Diab Med (1998) 15:205-212 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Same targets for all age paediatric age groups – the Hannover approach • HbA1c below 7.5% • prevent ketoacidosis • prevent school failure • prevent hypoglycemia KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus The ISPAD Vote September 28th,2007 Majority for age independent targets Target HbA1c < 8%: Target HbA1c < 7.5%: Target HbA1c < 7.0%: KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus But is the HbA1c the right target ? KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus The DCCT Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 1995; 44: 968-83 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT Time of diagnosis of background retinopathie (DMduration (years) für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus 25 HbA1c is a bad predictor of retinopathy in indvidual adolescents – the Berlin Retinopathy-Study 20 15 10 5 Longterm HbA1c (%)<6 Median Age (Years) - 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 >13 18.9 20.4 20.9 20.3 19.8 19.0 18.5 17.5 Danne et. al, Diab Care 17: 1390-96, 1994 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus The new information with CGM: Glycemic variability Comparison blinded FreeStyle Navigator vs. HbA1c Glucose Mean vs. HbA1c r=0.801 p<0.0001 Glucose S.D. vs. HbA1c r=0.675 p=0.0004 German Diabetes Association 2008 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Hannover Navigator Study Other Measures of Glycemic Control Masked Unmasked % Difference P-value Glucose Mean (mg/dL) Mean S.D. N 172 27 23 164 24 23 -4.5% 0.0577 Glucose S.D. (mg/dL) Mean S.D. N 61.8 11.9 23 56.1 14.2 23 -9.1% 0.0037 MAGE nadir to peak events (mg/dL) Mean S.D. N 135.2 28.9 23 125.1 28.1 23 -7.4% 0.0462 MAGE peak to nadir events (mg/dL) Mean S.D. N 140.6 28.3 23 126.8 29.7 23 -9.9% 0.0017 KINDERKRANKENHAUS AUF DER BULT für Kinder und Jugendliche Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Children with diabetes need insulin, love and care …and clear targets