Sucker Control in Burley Tobacco with and without MH Recommendations to Reduce MH Residue Reduce MH rate and add a local systemic 1.5 gal MH + 0.5 gal Butralin, Flupro or Prime+ Use Coarse nozzles TG-3 or TG-5 full cone nozzles Application Coarse nozzles TG-5 / CE-5 or equivalent at 44.5 mph TG-3 / CE-3 or equivalent at 2.53 mph Influence of Sucker Control Across Four Location on Burley Tobacco Yield 3000 2000 1500 1000 2557 2507 2380 2578 2411 2546 500 B (. 5 ) H (1 )+ H (1 .5 M M )+ B (.5 ) .5 ) P( H (1 )+ H (1 .5 M M )+ P( .5 ) H (2 ) M H (2 )F 0 M Yield lb/a 2500 Locations = Bath, Knox, Jackson & Pendleton LSD 0.05 = 177 Effects of Application of MH by Coarse vs Fine Nozzles on Yield of Burley Tobacco 4000 3500 Yield lb/a 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Bath Fleming Jackon Knox Laurel Lawrenc e Nelson Pendleto Average* n Fine 2398 3105 1713 2352 2074 2697 2194 2911 2355 Coarse 2617 3474 1998 2498 2291 2949 2397 3014 2524 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Average MH Residues by State ppm MH 1997-2004 KY IN MO NC OH TN VA ALL 1997 71 112 70 5 69 57 18 65 1998 79 38 62 11 59 48 17 70 1999 80 96 79 22 51 45 36 72 2000 48 32 95 31 20 44 52 46 2001 39 29 11 10 48 24 13 32 2002 38 36 13 32 34 30 35 2003 35 45 17 13 32 23 9 30 2004 39 42 58 20 25 26 34 35 Limited sample numbers on all but KY and TN 2000 - 2004 values are from warehouse sales only Range of MH Residues in Kentucky for 1997 - 2004 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 Extremely High Very High High Medium Low 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2 14 21 29 34 9 10 14 30 38 5 15 21 25 33 0 5 13 33 49 1 5 5 27 63 2 3 9 22 64 0 2 7 26 63 3 5 6 16 71 Low < 41, Medium = 41-80, High = 81-120, Very High = 120 - 200, Extremely High >200 ppm Advantages Higher yields Better returns Improved sucker control Lower MH residue Extended Control 5-7 wks Rain safety after 2 hrs Not as weather dependent No cover crop concern No ground sucker concern Improved grower confidence Produces darker cured leaf Disadvantages Higher Cost MH Free Tobacco MH Free Tobacco Trial Location Day Treatment Boom Nozzle Drought Sucker Control Home 16 Prime + Straight TG-3 Low Fair-Poor Two - Three 4-7" suckers in 1/2 of plants in top Dodd 16 Butralin Straight TG-3 Moderate Good Occasional 4-7" sucker Dodd 16 Prime + Straight TG-3 Moderate Good Occasional 4-7" sucker Dodd 16 Butralin 3 nozzle TG-3&5 Low-Mod Excellent Few suckers Dodd 16 Prime + Straight TG-3 Moderate Good Occasional 4-7" sucker 9 Prime + Straight TG-5 Mod-High Good Occasional 4-7" sucker 15 FA+ Flupro Straight TG-5 0-Low Poor Two 5-9" in tops of most plants Creek* By-Pass** Comments By-Pass** 15 Prime + Straight TG-5 0-Low Poor Three or more suckers in tops of most plants Shop** 14 Prime + Straight TG-5 0-Low Fair Two - Three 5-9" suckers in 1/3 of plants in top MH Free Tobacco Trial Observations Fair to good control for first 10 to 14 days “Escapes” common at the top of plant No difference between Prime +, Butralin, or Flupro observed Up to 2 or 3 suckers per plant Three nozzle arrangement slightly better Must be kept directly over the row Poor control when off row Each Leaf Direct Sucker Material to the Stalk 3/8th Phyllotaxy How leaves are arranged on the stalk Successful Methods Hand Jug method Backpack High Clearance Sprayer Drop Lines Workable Methods vs. Labor