Evaluating the Work of Your Student Jamil A. Khan, Ph.D., P.E.

advertisement
University of South Carolina
Evaluating the Work of Your Student
Jamil A. Khan, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor
Mechanical Engineering
University of South Carolina
TA TRAINING
 http://www.me.sc.edu/grad/TAtraining.html.
Evaluation of this workshop
University of South Carolina
 Q#1.
 What
 Q#2
are the three important traits of a good teacher?
Fill in the blank:
 A carefully
prepared detailed syllabus may prevent potential
_______ during the semester
 Q#3
 In
one sentence, write down what you would want me to do
differently if I were to teach this workshop again.
Modeling Critical Thinking
University of South Carolina
 Assign
open ended-problem
 Solution
should meet some constraint but is not unique
 Brain storm ideas
 Encourage out-of-the-box thinking
 Let
me hear your ideas
Effective teaching
students who are having unusual difficulty
and directing them to USC resources for help
 How to gauge your impact on students
University of South Carolina
 Spotting



 How
Reading signs, seek feed back
Ask questions outside the class (one on one)
Is the end of the semester student evaluation sufficient? Isn’t it
end-of-the-pipe inspection?
to know when to make changes in teaching the
class


Syllabus
Other changes
 Taylor

your teaching at the level of your students
Honors class teaching
 Balancing
your own research, class schedule with
teaching schedule
University of South Carolina
Grading Student work
(Why?)
Plan
DO
Act
Check
The Shewhart Cycle
Test Construction
University of South Carolina
 Don’t

go to outer space to pull test material
Comment on trick question
 Test
should show that you are meeting the course
objectives
 Be concerned about the reliability of the test. Test
questions should be clear.

Have it checked out by your peers or by yourself
 Frequency
of testing. I prefer frequent short tests
leading to big test
 Make the test close to reality.


In-class test are artificial
I real life problem solving is different from in-class test
Perspective
University of South Carolina
 Grades
measure what is known at the time of the
test
 Students are very interested in grades


In fact way too much focus
Quality of the instruction may be reflected in grades

Don’t teach like elementary school at the same time do not
teach like a monster
 Remember
learning is student’s responsibility, you
can not do it for them

You certainly can find out why a student is not learning
Grading
a teacher you have to demonstrate that you have
the ability to grade
University of South Carolina
 As


You can demonstrate this by helping the students continuously
improve
Do you have the credentials?
 Be
unbiased
 Grade should reflect connection between what was
asked and what was turned-in
 Grades are feed-back
 This feed-back should focus on the work not the
person

Separate the work from the student
Testing students during the semester
University of South Carolina
 When
to choose essay questions
 When to use short-answer questions
• Class size
 Pop
quizzes
 Regular short quizzes (announced)
Projects
University of South Carolina
 Are
open ended but still has some limitations
(constraint)
 Objective is to develop critical thinking
 Time constraint
 Know how far you can push the students
 Share the best method for completing the project
 It is always good to break-up the project into
separate groups and assign weighted grades
Papers
University of South Carolina
 Teaches
communication skills
 Follow proper format
University of South Carolina
 Evaluating
essays and answers to essay questions
Oral Presentation
University of South Carolina
 What
do you look for
 Introduction
 Problem
statement
 Body language and delivery
 Technical contents
 Audio visual aid and its use
 Conclusions
 Question/answers
Grading a Laboratory Report
 COMPONENTS
REQUIRED:
University of South Carolina
 1.
Title page - lab title, author(s), lab section, date
 2. Objective
 3. Actual data sheet - with observers and date of
experiments
 4. Sample calculations
 5. Results (tabular and/or graphical)
 6. Discussion of results
 7. Conclusions
 PREPARATION
 1.
GUIDELINES
Use white, unlined paper with no tattered edges.
 2. Must be typed.
 3. Graphs and tables should be professional quality. No
free-handing of curves permitted. Coordinates should be
neatly labeled. All figures must have a number and a title.
Download