IET Department/Program Assessment Plan
Program:
Safety and Health Management
Program Goals
1. Maintain clear,
Related
Department
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
Program applicants meet
BS and BAS SHM
Each spring
80% of program course
consistent, and
prerequisites specified in
program applicants
quarter
prerequisites met at time of
transparent program
degree application
application acceptance, 100%
paths from application
process
met within two quarters of
1, 2, 3, 7
1, 2, 4
1, 2
through graduation for
effective student
progress at all program
locations.
acceptance
Degree programs as
University catalog
presented in the catalog
and SHM website
Each fall quarter
100% accuracy
80% satisfaction with advising
and the SHM website
consistent with
documentation
Survey of advisees
Advisees in all
Advising week
regarding advising
programs
each quarter
experiences
No significant difference of
advising value between locations
Plan of study maintained
Plan of study by
for each student in an
student and advisor
Each quarter
100% of students have current
achievable plans
SHM program that will
lead to successful degree
completion
Plans published on
TAPP forms
applicable programs for
Each spring
100% coverage for applicable
quarter
associates degree programs
Each fall quarter
Favorable summary review of
transfer to SHM
Survey of mentors on
Mentor review forms
student internship
80% of students on mentor
preparedness
summary review
Page 1 of 19
Program Goals
Related
Department
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
Review of student
Student learning
progress toward and
outcome program
achievement of program
level checklists
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Each fall quarter
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
100% coverage of student
learning outcomes
educational objectives
2. Maintain a functional
1, 2, 3, 7
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Survey of graduates one
and effective
year after graduation
combination of programs
regarding use of
and courses at all
information from
locations that meets the
programmatic coursework
Recent graduates
Each winter
quarter
75% support/use of course
75% support/use of specific
skills
No significant difference of
needs of the safety and
program and course value
health management
between locations
profession.
Needs analysis by the
Industry
SHM advisory board
Program goals reviewed
Program goals
by faculty for
First year of
Report submitted for faculty
three year cycle
review
Each winter
100% inclusion of specified
quarter
criteria
consistency with
university, college,
department, and ABETASAC Safety criteria
Educational objectives
University catalog
Each winter
100% inclusion of educational
published
and SHM website
quarter
objectives in website and
catalog
Survey of mentors on
Mentor review forms
Each fall quarter
Identify potential KSA
student internship
deficiencies in programs and
preparedness
courses to be included in needs
analyses
Program evaluation-
Peer programs,
First year of
Report submitted to industry
Page 2 of 19
Program Goals
Related
Department
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
comparison by faculty
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
industry studies,
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
three year cycle
advisory board
literature
3. Maintain student
Student learning
Student learning
Each winter
100% inclusion of specified
learning outcomes that
outcomes reviewed by
outcomes
quarter
criteria in assessment tools
assure students are
faculty for consistency
prepared for careers in
with university, college,
safety and health
department, and ABET-
management.
ASAC Safety criteria
Industry
Second year of
Report submitted for faculty
three year cycle
review
Each quarter
100% submission of forms
1, 2, 5, 9, 10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Needs analysis by the
SHM advisory board
4. Maintain an effective
Continuous Process
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
1, 2, 6
8, 9
Improvement system.
Course Quality
Courses
Improvement form
courses are
completed by each
taught
instructor of record at
completion of course
ABET-ASAC Safety
BS Program
accreditation
ABET review
No deficiencies, no more than
cycle, initial site
five minor issues
visit fall 2009
Needs analysis by the
Implementation
SHM advisory board
5. Maintain the
1, 2, 3, 5
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Established university
curriculum establishes
general education
necessary core math,
requirements appropriate
science, and general
to discipline accurate and
education components to
published
SHM website
Third year of
100% coverage, review, and
three year cycle
evaluation by faculty
Winter quarter
100% accuracy
Page 3 of 19
Program Goals
Related
Department
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
achieve student learning
Transfer plans for
SHM website, TAPP
outcomes.
community college and
forms
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
Winter quarter
100% accuracy
Winter quarter
100% accuracy
direct transfer
agreement associates
degrees identifying
general education
requirements appropriate
to discipline
accurate/published
Admission prerequisites
SHM website, TAPP
to SHM baccalaureate
forms, SHM
programs accurate and
admission form
published
6. Faculty sufficient in
Spring quarter for
36 credit hour maximum per
number and
current academic
faculty per academic year
qualifications to meet
year
teaching, service, and
scholarship expectations
of university
1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
1, 2, 4, 5, 6
Faculty teaching load
Number of students in
Credit hours taught
Course enrollment
course
Day 10 each
Enrollment in any course does
quarter
not exceed 25 for non-DE
courses, 35 for DE courses
Faculty involvement with
Professional Records
professional societies
Follows university
Each faculty will actively
review cycle (1-3
participate in one or more
years)
safety-related professional
organization
Diversity of education
Follows university
100% of learning outcomes
and experience covers
review cycle (1-3
covered by faculty education or
each learning outcome
years)
experience
Professional Records
Page 4 of 19
Program Goals
Related
Department
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
Adjunct instructors meet
Professional Records
Follows university
100% of adjunct instructors
minimum university and
review cycle (1-3
possess at least two of
program requirements
years)

safety-related education
at the masters level

professional safetyrelated credential, or

Participation in scholarly
safety-related experience
Follows university
Each faculty member will
work appropriate to
review cycle (1-3
present original research once
safety
years)
every three years in or at a
Professional Records
safety-related publication or
seminar
Faculty participate in
Follows university
Each faculty member will
service and other
review cycle (1-3
conduct or participate in one
professional activities to
years)
service related safety activity
Professional Records
maintain knowledge of
every three years.
the safety and health
management discipline
7. Facilities
1, 4, 6
1, 5
1, 2, 3, 4
Number of students in
Students
classroom
Equipment maintained in
Equipment
Day 10 each
Enrollment in any course does
quarter
not exceed classroom limits
Spring quarter
100% of equipment operating
safe working order
Equipment demonstrated
correctly
Equipment
Spring quarter
100% of equipment consistent
in class consistent with
with contemporary use in
contemporary use
practice
Page 5 of 19
Program Goals
Related
Department
Goals
8. Support and
1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
resources from various
9, 10
Related
College
Goals
1, 3, 4, 5
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Method(s) of
Assessment (What is
the assessment?)
Who/What
Assessed
(population, item)
When Assessed
(term, dates)
Criterion of Achievement
(Expectation of how good
things should be?)
Professional development
Professional Records
Follows university
Each faculty will attend one or
resources used to
review cycle (1-3
more course content related or
sources are utilized to
enhance program
years)
learning outcome related
improve the equipment,
knowledge base
materials, and
Foundation account
knowledge of the
program.
classes or seminars
Foundation account
Spring quarter
Account balance not diminishing
sufficient to repair
and all equipment and resources
and/or replace equipment
needed available and in good
and materials as needed
working order
to meet program
objectives
Professional development
Follows university
Each faculty utilizes more than
resources used to
review cycle (1-3
half of the available funds to
enhance program
years)
attend one or more classes or
Professional Records
seminars related to program
knowledge base
goals, course content, or
learning outcomes
9. Maintain SHM
program in accordance
with applicable ABET-
1, 5, 7
1, 4
1, 2, 4, 5
Applicable ABET-ASAC
program criteria met
Program criteria
Year preceding
Applicable program criteria are
ABET-ASAC self-
addressed in self study report
study report
ASAC program criteria.
Page 6 of 19
IET Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan Preparation Form
Program:
Safety and Health Management
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
1. Graduates will be
able to apply
knowledge of
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3, 5
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 6
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Rubric-based evaluation of projects and
SHM 351/2/3
F/W, W/S,
Successful
S annually
completion of
examinations including application of
algebra and statistics
mathematics,
SHM
projects
471/2/4/5/7
80% on math related
science, and applied
questions on exams
sciences.
Rubric-based evaluation of projects and
SHM 377,
S, W, F
Successful
examinations including application of
472, 477
annually
completion of
chemistry
projects
80% on math related
questions on exams
Rubric-based evaluation of projects and
examinations including application of
biology
SHM 472
Winter
Successful
annually
completion of
projects
80% on math related
questions on exams
Page 7 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Rubric-based evaluation of projects and
SHM 351, 471
F/W, F
Successful
annually
completion of
examinations including application of
physics
projects
80% on math related
questions on exams
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
2. Graduates will be
able to design and
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Examination on data manipulation and
SHM 351
presentation
Fall/Winter
80% correct answers
annually
on data manipulation
conduct
experiments, as
well as to analyze
questions
Examination on data analysis
SHM 352/3
and interpret data.
W/S, S
80% correct answers
annually
on data analysis
questions
Rubric-based evaluation of project work
SHM
F, W, W, S,
Completion of
including data collection design and data
471/2/4/5/7
F annually
project to client
interpretation
Rubric-based evaluation of project work
specifications
SHM 485
including data interpretation
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Spring
Completion of
annually
project
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 8 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
3. Graduates will be
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
able to formulate
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 6
10
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Examination of design, process, life
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 352
W/S
80% correct answers
annually
on terminology
cycle terminology knowledge
or design a system,
questions
process, or program
to meet desired
needs.
Rubric-based evaluation of project work
SHM
F, W, S, S,
Completion of
to develop a written safety program.
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
project to client
specifications
Rubric-based evaluation of project work
SHM
F, W, W, S,
Completion of
including project design, proposal,
471/2/4/5/7
F annually
project to client
performance, and final
specifications
report/presentation of project to audit
performance
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
4. Graduates will be
able to function on
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Peer evaluation of group participation
SHM
W, F/S, S, F
80% positive
skills
321/3/5/7
annually
response on peer
multidisciplinary
(students take
teams.
one)
review form
Page 9 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Examination of team membership
SHM 351/2/3
F/W, W/S,
80% correct answer
responsibility knowledge
(bacc.
S annually
on team questions on
students take
final exam
three,
minor/certific
ate students
take two)
Peer evaluation of team participation
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% positive
skills
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
response from team
(bacc.
members on
students take
participation and
three,
role
minor/certific
ate students
take two)
Team member evaluation of leadership
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% positive
skills
471/2/4/5/7
F annually
response from team
(bacc.
members on team
students take
leadership/managem
three,
ent
minor/certific
ate students
take one)
Page 10 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Peer evaluation of participation on
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 485
Spring
80% positive
annually
response from team
multidisciplinary team
members
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
75% positive
Quarterly
response
improvement
5. Graduates will be
able to identify and
solve applied
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Rubric-based evaluation of student
Winter,
80% correct
application of science knowledge to
Spring,
application
specific safety and health challenges.
Winter
SHM 373/7/9
science problems.
annually
Rubric-based evaluation of student
SHM 471/2/7
analysis of science knowledge to
Fall, Winter,
80% correct analysis
Fall annually
specific safety and health challenges.
Rubric-based evaluation of student
SHM 485
synthesis of knowledge into complex
Spring
80% correct
annually
synthesis
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response of student
problem-solving situations.
Mentor evaluation of problem-solving
SHM 490
work.
internship
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 11 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
6. Graduates will be
able to consider
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 6
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Examination of fundamental ethical
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 351/2/3
F/W, W/S,
80% correct
S annually
response on
knowledge
professional and
examination
ethical
question(s)
responsibility and
apply to their work.
Rubric-based evaluation of project and
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% correct
examination of student application of
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
application
Rubric-based evaluation of project and
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
examination of student application of
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application
SHM 485
Spring
80% correct
annually
response on
professional and ethical responsibility
knowledge to program development
professional and ethical responsibility
knowledge to auditing
Examination of application of ethical
knowledge to scenarios
examination
question(s)
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 12 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
7. Graduates will be
able to
communicate
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 6
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Examination of knowledge and rubric-
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 351/2/3
Fall, Winter,
80% correct
based evaluation of written
Spring
response on
communication
annually
examination
effectively.
question(s)
80% correct
application to
project
Rubric-based evaluation of written
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% correct
program
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
application
Rubric-based evaluation of proposal and
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
report project skills
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application
Examination of knowledge and rubric-
SHM 351/2/3
Fall, Winter,
80% correct
Spring
response on
annually
examination
based evaluation of presentation skills
question(s)
80% correct
application to
project
Rubric-based evaluation of program
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% correct
presentation
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
application
Page 13 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Rubric-based evaluation of proposal and
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
report project presentation skills and
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
Quarterly
75% positive
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
client interaction skills
response
improvement
8. Graduates will
have the broad
education
necessary to
understand the
impact of solutions
in a global and
societal context.
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Rubric-based evaluation of student
SHM
F, W, W, S,
Completion of
contextualization of project to client
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
project to client
culture and needs
Rubric-based evaluation of written
specifications
SHM 481
summary of professional seminar of
Winter
80% correct
annually
application
Spring
80% correct
annually
application
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response of student
industry presenters
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM 485
of knowledge to multidisciplinary
project
Mentor evaluation of student
SHM 490
contextualization of knowledge to
internship setting
internship
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 14 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
9. Graduates will
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
recognize the need
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 6
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Rubric-based evaluation of written
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 481
Winter
80% correct
annually
application
Spring
80% correct
annually
application
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response
Quarterly
75% positive
summary of professional seminar of
10
for and an ability to
industry presenters
engage in life-long
Rubric-based evaluation of self-
learning.
SHM 485
directed learning within the context of
multidisciplinary teamwork
Mentor evaluation of student
SHM 490
engagement of life-long learning
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
response
improvement
10. Graduates will
be able to apply
their knowledge of
contemporary
issues of safety
and health
management to
their work.
2, 3
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
Rubric-based evaluation of written
SHM 481
summary of professional seminar of
Winter
80% correct
annually
application
Spring
80% correct
annually
application
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response
industry presenters
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM 485
of contemporary safety and health
management issues within the context
of multidisciplinary teamwork
Mentor evaluation of student application
of knowledge
SHM 490
Page 15 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
Quarterly
75% positive
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
response
improvement
11. Graduates will
2, 3
be able to use the
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 6
10
Examination of knowledge of
SHM
W, F/S, S, F
80% correct
techniques, skills, and tools
321/3/5/7
annually
response on
SHM 351/2/3
F/W, W/S,
techniques, skills,
and modern
examination
question(s)
S annually
scientific and
technical tools
necessary for
professional
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
and use of techniques, skills, and tools
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application to
project
practice.
Mentor evaluation of student use of
SHM 490
techniques, skills, and tools
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
12. Graduates will
be able to
anticipate,
recognize, and
evaluate hazardous
conditions and
practices affecting
people, property,
2, 3, 9
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 5, 6
Examination of student knowledge of
SHM
W, F/S, S, F
80% correct
hazardous conditions and potential
321/3/5/7
annually
response on
outcomes of exposure
examination
question(s)
80% correct
application to
project
Page 16 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
SHM 351
Fall/Winter
80% correct
and the
Examination of knowledge of incident
environment.
investigation and rubric-based
response on
evaluation of those skills and application
examination
of hazard recognition
question(s)
80% correct
application to
project
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM 352
skills to pre-incident evaluation and
Winter/Spri
80% correct
ng
application
anticipation of potential outcomes
Rubric-based evaluation of anticipation
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% correct
of effects of hazardous conditions and
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
application
Rubric-based evaluation of student
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
skills in hazard evaluation
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application
Mentor evaluation of student use of
SHM 490
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response of student
response measures
hazard management knowledge
internship
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 17 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
13. Graduates will
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
2, 3, 9
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
be able to develop
Related
College
Goals
1, 2, 4
Related
University
Goals
1, 2, 4, 5, 6
10
and evaluate
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
Examination of student knowledge
All students in
Spring
80% correct
regarding risk management principles
SHM 353
annually
response on
examination
and practices
appropriate
question(s)
strategies designed
to mitigate risk.
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM
F, W, S, S,
80% correct
of risk mitigation to project to develop
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
application to
written program
project
Rubric-based evaluation of application
SHM
F, W, W, S,
80% correct
of risk analysis and modeling to client
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
application to
project
Rubric-based evaluation of application
project
SHM 485
of risk management in a
Spring
80% correct
annually
application to
multidisciplinary project
Mentor evaluation of student use of risk
project
SHM 490
management practices during internship
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response of student
internship
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
14. Graduates will
be able to apply
principles of safety
2, 3, 9
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10
1, 2, 4
1, 2, 4, 5, 6
Rubric-based evaluation of client-
SHM
F, W, S, S,
Project completed to
driven, non-classroom based project to
371/3/5/7/9
W annually
client specifications
develop written program
Page 18 of 19
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(performance,
knowledge,
attitudes)
Related
Program
Goals
Related
Departmental
Goals
Related
College
Goals
Related
University
Goals
Method(s) of Assessment (What is
the assessment?)*
Who
Assessed
(Students
from what
courses –
population)*
*
When
Assessed
(term,
dates) ***
Standard of
Mastery/
Criterion of
Achievement
(How good does
performance have
to be?)
and health in a non-
Rubric-based evaluation of client-
SHM
F, W, W, S,
Project completed to
academic setting
driven, non-classroom based project to
471/2/4/5/7
S annually
client specifications
through an intern,
design, propose, conduct, and report
SHM 490
Summer
80% positive mentor
annually
response of student
cooperative, or
supervised
experience.
Mentor evaluation of overall student
internship performance
internship
Student course closeout reflective
All students in
survey of knowledge, skills, and value
all courses
Quarterly
75% positive
response
improvement
Page 19 of 19