Essentials of Business Law and the Legal Environment, 10th edition by Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Topics Covered Chapter 22: Product Liability I. Warranties A. Types of Warranties B. Obstacles to Warranty Actions II. Strict Liability in Tort A. Requirements of Strict Liability B. Obstacles to Recovery C. Restatement of Torts (Third): Products Liability Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Types of Warranties Definition of Warranty – an obligation of the seller to the buyer concerning title, quality, characteristics, or condition of goods. Warranty of Title – the obligation of a seller to convey the right to ownership without any lien (in a lease the warranty protects the lessee's right to possess and use the goods). Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Types of Warranties Express Warranty – an affirmation of fact or promise about the goods or a description, including a sample, of the goods that becomes part of the basis of the bargain. Implied Warranty – a contractual obligation, arising out of certain circumstances of the sale, imposed by operation of law and not found in the language of the sales contract. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Implied Warranty Merchantability – warranty by a merchant that goods are reasonably fit for the ordinary purpose for which they are intended, pass without objection under the contract description, and are of average quality. Fitness for Particular Purpose – warranty by any seller that goods are reasonably fit for a particular purpose if, at the time of contracting, the seller had reason to know the buyer's particular purpose and that the buyer was relying on the seller's skill and judgment to furnish suitable goods. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Obstacles to Warranty Actions Disclaimers of Warranties – negations of warranties. Express Warranty – not usually possible to disclaim. Warranty of Title – may be excluded or modified by specific language or by certain circumstances, including judicial sale or a sale by a sheriff, executor, or foreclosing lienor. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Requirements for Disclaimers Implied Warranty of Merchantability – must mention “merchantability” and, in the case of a writing, must be conspicuous (in a lease the disclaimer must be in writing). Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose – must be written and conspicuous Other – may also be disclaimed (1) by expressions like “as is,” “with all faults,” or other similar language; (2) by course of dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade; or (3) as to defects an examination ought to have revealed where the buyer has examined the goods or where the buyer has refused to examine the goods. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Warranties Type of Warranty How Create d What is Warrante d How Disclaimed Title • Seller contracts to sell goods • Good title • Rightful transfer • Not subject to lien • Specific language • Circumstances giving reason to know that seller does not claim title Express • • • • • Conform to affirmation • Conform to promise • Conform to sample model, or description • Usually not possible Merchantability • Merchant sells goods • Fit for ordinary purposes • Adequately contained, packaged, and labeled • • • • • Must mention “merchantability” If in writing must be conspicuous As-is sale Buyer examination Course of dealing, course of performance, usage of trade Fitness for a particular purpose • Seller knows buyer is relying on seller to select goods suitable for buyer’s particular purpose • Fit for particular purpose • • • • • No specific words necessary In writing and conspicuous As-is sale Buyer examination Course of dealing, course of performance, usage of trade Affirmation of fact Promise Description Sample or model Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Federal Legislation The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act protects purchasers of consumer goods by providing that warranty information be clear and useful and that a seller who makes a written warranty cannot disclaim any implied warranty. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Privity of Contract A contractual relationship between parties required by common law to maintain a lawsuit. Horizontal Privity – doctrine determining who benefits from a warranty and who therefore may bring a cause of action; the Code provides three alternatives. Vertical Privity – doctrine determining who in the chain of distribution is liable for a breach of warranty; the Code has not adopted a position on this. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Plaintiff's Conduct Contributory Negligence – is not a defense. Voluntary Assumption of the Risk – is a defense. Notice of Breach – if the buyer fails to notify the seller of any breach within a reasonable time, she is barred from any remedy against the seller. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Strict Liability in Tort General Rule – imposes tort liability on merchant sellers for both personal injuries and property damage for selling a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Manufacturing Defect By failing to meet its own manufacturing specifications, the product is not properly made Design Defect – the product, though made as designed, is dangerous because the design is inadequate. Failure to Warn – failure to provide adequate warnings of possible danger or to provide appropriate directions for use of a product. Unreasonably Dangerous – contains a danger beyond that which would be contemplated by the ordinary consumer. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Obstacles to Recovery Contractual Defenses – defenses such as privity, disclaimers, and notice generally do not apply to tort liability. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Plaintiff's Conduct Contributory Negligence – not a defense in the majority of States. Comparative Negligence – most States have applied the rule of comparative negligence to strict liability in tort. Voluntary Assumption of the Risk – express assumption of risk is a defense to an action based upon strict liability; some states apply implied assumption of risk to strict liability cases. Misuse or Abuse of the Product – is a defense. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Plaintiff's Conduct Subsequent Alteration – liability exists only if the product reaches the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. Statute of Repose – limits the time period for which a manufacturer is liable for injury caused by its product. Limitations on Damages – many States have limited the punitive damages that a plaintiff can collect in a product liability lawsuit. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability General Rule – One engaged in the business of selling products who sells a defective product is subject to liability for harm to persons or property caused by the defect. Manufacturing Defect – seller is strictly liable when product departs from its intended design. Design Defect – a product is defective when the foreseeable risks of harm posed by it could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a reasonable alternative design. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability Failure to Warn – a product is defective because of inadequate instructions or warnings when the foreseeable risks of harm posed by the product could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings. Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Product Liability Merchantability* Strict Liability in Tort Condition of Goods Creating Liability Not fit for ordinary purposes Defective condition, unreasonably dangerous Type of Transaction Covered Sales; some courts apply to leases and bailments of goods Sales, leases, and bailments of goods Disclaimer Must mention “merchantability.” If Not possible in consumer in writing, must be conspicuous. transactions; may be permitted in Must not be unconscionable. commercial transactions Subject to Magnuson-Moss Act. Notice to Seller Required within reasonable time Not required Causation Required Required Who May Sue In some states, buyer and the Any user or consumer of product; buyer’s family or guests in home; also, in most states, any bystander in other states, any person who may be expected to use, consume, or be affected by goods Compensable Harms Personal injury, property damage, economic loss Personal injury, property damage Who May Be Sued Seller who is a merchant with respect to the goods sold Seller who is engaged in business of selling such a product *The warranty of fitness for a particular purpose differs form the warranty of merchantability in the following respects: (1) the condition that triggers liability is the failure of the goods to perform according to the particular purpose described in the warranty, and (2) a disclaimer need not mention “fitness for a particular purpose.” Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning.