Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF)
Outline
Organizational Chart
Facility Design Criteria, User’s Requirements and
Layout
Previous Work
Status to Date (Site preparation, Title II and Title III)
Budget and Schedule
Technical Challenges (Risks)
ES&H Issues
Management Challenges
Path Forward
April 5, 2005
MMF
1
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Organizational Chart
Magnetic Measurement Facility (MMF)
Robert Ruland – Alignment Mgr
Zachary Wolf – User
Conventional Facilities-WBS 1.09
Project Office
David Saenz – Conventional
Facilities Manager
Jim Welch – CF Systems
Physicist
Javier A. Sevilla-CF Project
Engineer/CAM
Jo Beth Folger-CF Engineer
Richard Hislop – Construction
Safety Manager
Anita Malahowski –Cost/Schedule
Bruce Patten –
Contracts/Procurement
Jesse Saldivar – CF Technical
Assistance
April 5, 2005
MMF
2
SAFETY
Conventional
Facilities
Cost/
Schedule
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Facility
RequirementsScope
Facility Design Requirements
Technical Note LCLS-TN-041-Z
Space Requirements
Environmental Stability (3 areas)
Space Temperature: ± 0.1 °C short
term may go up to 0.3°C if < 1Hr
Relative Humidity: 45%± 5%
Other areas: ±1°C and ±2.5°C
Vibration <0.5 microns-MM Lab
Utility Requirements
Electrical (new 800A feeder
MMFBldg Upgrade)
Other (compressed air and small
chiller for User’s equipment)
April 5, 2005
MMF
3
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
MMF Facility Uses
Undulator magnet tuning – 2 magnet measuring
machine test stands
Aligned with same orientation to Earth’s magnetic field
as LCLS Undulator Hall.
Undulator fiducialization – large coordinate
measuring machine
Cradle assembly area
Magnet storage/temperature acclimation
Work desks in lab and office space for 2
employees
April 5, 2005
MMF
4
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Resultant Building Criteria
~4,800 sq. ft. floor space (inc. ~3,000 laboratory
space, mech Rm) + mezzanine 1,400 sf (HVAC &
Electrical)
Locate within an existing building to aid in
temperature control
Adequate ceiling height for overhead cranes
Accessible for magnet delivery using trucks and
forklifts
Electrical service – 800A, 480v, 3Ø
April 5, 2005
MMF
5
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Building 081 Location
Research
Yard
LINAC
NORTH
April 5, 2005
MMF
LCLS
Undulator
Hall
PEP Ring Road
6
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Building 081 Site Layout
Front
Rear
Haz Mat
April 5, 2005
MMF
7
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Building 081 Current Uses
~25 Ft height
April 5, 2005
MMF
8
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
New Space Allocation for Bldg. 081
Front
(N) Fire Alarm Panel
(N) MCC-B081
Offices
SHIPPING & RECEIVING
VEHICLE
SHOP
EQUIPMENT
REPAIR
Rear
April 5, 2005
MMF
9
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
MMF Ground Floor Plan
± 0.1°C,
45%RH ±5
Coordinate
Measuring
Area
~ 1,000 ft. sq.
Magnet Loading
and Storage
~850 ft. sq.
± 1°C, 45% RH ±5
± 2.5°C
Magnet Measuring
Lab
~1,800 ft. sq.
Cradle Assembly Area
~325 ft. sq.
Mechanical Room
~256 ft. sq.
Rear
April 5, 2005
MMF
10
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Mezzanine Floor Plan
Equipment:
4 Air handling Units
1 Motor Control Center,
X-trmr, Panels,
1 small Compressor
HVAC Control Panel
Mezzanine for
Mechanical/Electrical
Equipment in
Conditioned space
MCC
Rear
April 5, 2005
MMF
11
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Rear Elevation-MMF
Mezzanine
Mechanical
Access
Staff Access
Roll up door for magnets delivery
April 5, 2005
MMF
12
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
User’s Layout (By R. Ruland, Oct, 2004)
Floor plan divided into three functional areas
Magnetic Measurements (± 0.1º C)
Fiducialization and Assembly (± 1º C)
Storage (± 2.5º C)
Test stand lay-out is driven by requirement to
match the Earth Magnetic Field conditions in
lab to Undulator Hall, i.e. azimuth and gap
orientation need to be identical
April 5, 2005
MMF
13
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Previous Work
Title I Drawings and Specifications –completed by JE
External Review October 14, 2004
Report with recommendations
Internal reviews (SLAC)
Facility’s User (Metrology Group)
50% and 100% drawings and Specs:
ES&H, Citizen’s Committees
Conventional Experimental Facilities Dept (CEF) old SEM
April 5, 2005
MMF
14
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Status
Title II Drawings and Specifications –prepared by JE
Issued for Construction-March 11, 05
In-progress: Review and “Final” approval by SLAC’ Citizens
Committees and ES&H- Obtained approval for bidding
Site Preparation Work (activities delayed)
Resources allocation Accident related (CEF support)
On-going: Design and coordination (new storage carrousel, shelving
and Haz Material storage relocation, move occupants new electrical
feeder to building, FA system and data network upgrade)
Title III
Procurement: Select only “qualified” subcontractors based on a “criteria”
Develop and implement a “Commissioning” plan
Beneficial Occupancy: Feb’06
April 5, 2005
MMF
15
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Budget & Schedule
Title III
Including Site Preparation $2.04M
(excludes: fire alarm building upgrade B081 and some relocation costs)
Bidding and Award
April – June 2005- Site visit: April 7, 2005
Bids due May 5 and Award May 27, 2005
Construction and Commissioning
Execution: Mid June 05 – February 06
Beneficial Occupancy to Project Office Feb-06
April 5, 2005
MMF
16
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Schedule P3
April 5, 2005
MMF
17
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Cost Estimate- WBS1.09.03.02
Estimated Total Cost $2.04M
Construction Subcontract: $ 1,493 K
Site Preparation & Electrical LLP: $ 546K
Allocated Contingency: 30% construction-not included
Demolition
Demolition
$41,872- 2%
Site Prep & LLP
$545,652- 27%
Mechanical-HVAC
HVAC
&Mechanical
$566,814- 28%
Structure and
Foundation
Interiors & Cranes
$332,948- 16%
Commissioning &
Testing
$59,451- 3%
April 5, 2005
MMF
Electrical
Structure &
Foundation,
$169,583- 8%
Electrical
$321,835- 16%
Testing &
Commissioning
Interiors and Cranes
Site Preparation
18
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Risks
Internal technical: Not achieving the Temperature
and Stability requirements
Plan: Design reviews, constructability and commissioning plan
Internal non-technical: Delays in the BO date
Plan: Use good and effective Project Management approach, and
select only “qualified” contractors including subs
Internal non-technical: Safety accidents
Plan: Pre-qualification of contractors, strict implementation and close
monitoring of Safety Plans and Procedures
April 5, 2005
MMF
19
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
ES&H Issues
Demolition activities
Site Preparation: Excavation
Excavation Permit for Relocation of Haz Mat Storage was obtained
Sampling of soil by ES&H
Air quality-BAAQMD-not applicable
Construction Activity Hazards
Construction Safety oversight by LCLS Safety Manager, LCLS Divisional
ES&H Coordinator, SLAC Safety OSHA Inspectors and by SLAC trained
UTR.
Subcontractors will be required to staff project with a Construction Safety
Professional
Includes preparation of Pre-work Hazard Analysis, Job Hazard Analysis and
Mitigation (JHAM) and all applicable DOE and Federal Safety Regulations.
Radiation
None
Hoisting/Rigging
Citizens’ Committee and/or Hoisting/Rigging inspector will review and
approve the Subcontractor’s Rigging Plan for the testing, commissioning
and acceptance of new cranes
April 5, 2005
MMF
20
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Management Challenges
Cost/Schedule Risks
Cost estimate based on Jacobs estimate– confirmation
when bids are received from subcontractors (Factors:
Market conditions, qualification criteria and NEW Safety
Requirements).
Schedule
Coordination and Support from other SLAC’s
Departments (ES&H, Stores, CEF)
SLAC policy changes in the wake of 10/11/04 electrical
accident are still being developed. (UTR responsibilities,
Authority and Oversight may change, etc.)
April 5, 2005
MMF
21
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu
Path Forward
Enforce Safety Regulations to All Sub-Contractors
Implement Criteria Selection for Bidding and Construction
to ALL Sub-Contractors
Coordinate and Complete ALL Site Preparation activities
Management and Lab support
Construction and Commissioning
Schedule and Cost Controls
Strict compliance with Drawings and Specifications
Execute an integrated verification of: operational performance,
testing, complete documentation and training of SLAC personnel,
which will operate and maintain this Facility.
April 5, 2005
MMF
22
Javier A. Sevilla
sevilla@slac.stanford.edu