Schedule changes & reminders: *Dr. Majewska will not lecture on Wed March 16th; NO CLASS THIS WEDNESDAY *Next Mon March 21st: lecture on synaptogenesis *Next Wed March 23rd: Dr. Robert Freeman lecturing on trophic factors and programmed cell death (as scheduled) *Exam 2 on Mon March 28th; old exam posted on BB Refinement of synaptic connections— 1. Muscle activity correlates w/ timing of synaptic refinement at the NMJ [TTX cuff = excess synapses vs. stimulating electrode= rapid elimination] 2. Distance between contacts regulates synapse elimination [shorter distance= more elimination] 3. Sensory experience regulates synaptic refinement and sensory coding properties [or a neuron’s response to a specific stimulus] e.g. frequency tuning curve (plot of sound freq vs. intensity at which freq evokes response)= a measure of afferent innervation in the auditory pathway (IC) Repeated broadband stimulus in young rodents inhibits synaptic refinement Clicks cause many auditory nerves to fire simultaneously IC neurons less selective in response to various sound levels at which neurons respond Broadened frequency curves remain throughout development Limited visual experience leads to limited neuronal responses Neuronal programmed cell death (apoptosis) during development: a normal part of maturation required to reduce redundancy The four main stages of neural development Developmental neuronal death is apoptotic; injury may be necrotic Apoptosis triggers endonucleases to digest DNA, & proteases to cleave proteins Cell Death in the SNB: regulated by testosterone levels Embryonic kitten retina has apoptotic neurons DNA fragmentation patterns can distinguish apoptosis vs. necrosis TUNEL: TdT dUTP nick end labeling (of DNA fragments) TUNEL labeling of apoptotic neurons The stages of neuronal death caspases activate flippase altered reduction of O2 to O2 - Many brain neural progenitors die just after S phase in late development ISEL labeling (Klenow, 5’ends); TUNEL labeling (TdT, 3’ends) Neuronal survival factors have many sources Adding or removing limb bud influences DRG/motor neuron survival Neuron # determined by proliferation, differentiation, & survival signals from target Limb bud removal experiment: less target = more DRG death The majority of frog motor neurons die during normal development Approximately half of all types of neurons die by maturity -rat RGCs: 50% die -chick ciliary ganglion neurons: 50% die -mouse cortex: 20-50% neurons die Differential DRG cell death along body axis correlates w/ target size Trophic factors derive from targets, afferents, neighboring somata, blood, & glia Removing the cochlea causes neuron death only until P9 (gerbils) *early deafferentation causes death b/c of constitutive proapoptotic gene expression; at P9, anti-apoptotic genes turn on Removing chick cochlea during development also causes death (in the NM) Inverse relationship between afferent target neuron death and tissue generation Neuronal survival from afferents, neighbors, glia, blood, or target cells Hormonal regulation of neuron death vs. survival SNB (spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus) motor neurons innervate perineal muscles required for male mating; are nearly absent in females Tumor cell-supplied neuronal survival factor: a soluble substance secreted by target The neuronal survival factor is a soluble protein (in venom and salivary gland) cultured sympathetic neurons *venom enzyme digests DNA/RNA Neurotrophins & their receptors are essential for neuronal survival Neuronal death is dependent on protein synthesis *translation or transcription inhibitors Motoneurons & DRG neurons can be rescued in vivo via inhibiting protein synthesis Motor neuron death is activity-dependent & blocked by curare (ACh antagonist) Increased MN survival: more MN synapses on muscle, more target-derived survival signaling *TTX: blocks Na+ channels/action potential Hermaphrodite vulval neural precursors are protected from death