1 2 3

advertisement
1
Supplementary Text
2
3
Analytical Details
4
5
General
6
After drilling or scooping, ~50 to ~150 mg of sample is dropped into a quartz sample cup
7
which is then transported into an oven, evacuated, and heated monotonically over about
8
one hour to a temperature of ~900oC. The heating schedule varied somewhat among the
9
individual analyses, as did the ultimate temperature achieved; these differences have no
10
observable effect on Cl isotopic composition. During heating a He carrier gas sweeps
11
evolved gases into the SAM analytical suite, including a small split of the gas flow into
12
the QMS. The QMS has an electron impact ion source and a pulse-counting secondary
13
electron multiplier and can scan the entire mass range from 2 to 527 Da, although
14
typically a smaller mass range (e.g., 2-150 Da) is scanned during EGA sequences. The
15
QMS has a mass resolution of unity, so species with the same nominal mass-to-charge
16
ratio are not distinguished. As discussed below, this necessitates correction for isobaric
17
interferences. Correction is also required for SEM deadtime, which increases with count
18
rate. At about a million cps the correction is ~1%; for all Cl isotope measurements
19
reported here the deadtime correction is < 1.5%.
20
21
Isobaric Species
22
We compute Cl isotope ratios from the HCl peaks after making any necessary corrections
23
for isobaric species (see equation 1 and associated definition of variables in main text).
S1
24
Potential isobars we have identified include Ar, hydrocarbons, oxygen, H2S, CS2 and
25
acetonitrile. Here we quantify these isobars and develop correction schemes as needed.
26
27
Compared to HCl, the amount of Ar present in the samples is negligible. The
28
geochronology experiment undertaken on the Cumberland sample by SAM (Farley et al.,
29
2014) determined an 36Ar concentration of 55 pmol/g, compared with an EGA-based HCl
30
concentration in the same sample of ~7 mmol/g (Ming et al., 2014), yielding a 36Ar/HCl
31
ratio of less than 10 ppm. The same logic precludes a substantial contribution from 38Ar
32
on mass 38. Inspection of the abundances of parent ions indicates negligible contributions
33
to M38 from CS2 and acetonitrile. Similarly, the contribution to mass 36 from 18O18O is
34
extremely small – the natural abundance of 18O is just ~0.2%, so this isotopologue will be
35
just 4 ppm of the 16O16O signal at mass 32. The mass 32 signal in our samples includes
36
both 16O16O and 32S, so it provides an upper limit on the amount of O2 evolved from the
37
samples. 4 ppm of the mass 32 signal in our samples is always very small compared to
38
the total signal at mass 36.
39
40
Given these simplifications, the important isobars for Cl isotope ratio determination are
41
H234S, C3H2 and C3, so:
42
43
RCl= (M38 – kHC38M39)/ (M36 – ksM34 – kHC36M39)
(S1)
44
45
We correct for H2S using the primary H2S signal at mass 34 (corrected for very minor
46
contributions from 18O16O) and the isotopic composition of sulfur (ks = 34S/32S ~ 0.0448).
S2
47
Following previous work (Farley et al., 2014) we correct for hydrocarbons using the
48
C3H3 fragment at mass 39 (kHC38 = C3H2/C3H3 ~ 0.19, kHC36 = C3/C3H3 ~ 0.02). Below we
49
assign exact values and uncertainties to these correction factors.
50
51
Over the course of the EGA run the relative intensity of the isobars compared to the HCl
52
signal varies, causing highly time-variable uncertainties in the corrected HCl abundances
53
and the resulting isotopic ratios. Denoting the numerator of equation S1 as N and the
54
denominator as D, the uncertainty in Cl isotope ratio determined on a given sweep of the
55
mass spectrum is:
56
(σRCl/RCl) = [(σ(σ(σDD
57
58

59
where



S2)
60
61
σ (σkHC38M39)2((σkHCkHC(σM39M39
(S3)
62
63
σD(σkSM34)2((σksks(σM34M34
64
kHC36M39)2((σkHC36kHC36(σM39M39

(S4)
65
66
67
SAM blank and background measurements indicate kHC36 varies between about 0.17 and
68
0.21, presumably reflecting small variations in the relative abundance of various organic
69
contaminants in the system. This limited variability in organic composition is further
S3
70
supported by the near constancy of the purely hydrocarbon ratios M40/M39 and
71
M41/M39 within and between EGA runs. We adopt a best estimate of kHC38 = 0.19 ±
72
0.048 (1σ). Owing to the overwhelming abundance of HCl on mass 36 even in blank
73
runs, the value of kHC36 is difficult to determine directly. Based on runs with very high
74
organic concentrations (e.g, OD2; see below) and on the fragmentation pattern of likely
75
organic molecules in SAM (e.g., Freissinet et al., 2015; Glavin et al., 2013) we adopt a
76
value of kHC36 = 0.02 ±0.02. Modeling shows that selection of even a far higher value
77
(e.g., 0.1) would make a quantitative but not a qualitative difference to our results.
78
79
The isotopic composition of sulfur dictates kS; to accommodate possible isotopic
80
variability and mass bias we adopt a best estimate and uncertainty of kS=0.0448 ± 0.002.
81
In all of our samples the hydrocarbon correction greatly dominates the Cl isotope ratio
82
uncertainty.
83
84
Inspection of equations S2-S4 indicates three sources of uncertainty, arising from: a) the
85
instrumental bias; b) the absolute signal counts; and c) the isobar corrections. We believe
86
instrumental bias is a systematic uncertainty, and provide justification for this conclusion
87
below. Because it is systematic to all of our measurements, we do not include
88
instrumental bias explicitly in the following computations. The uncertainty associated
89
with absolute signal intensity is random, so declines with the total number of counts
90
measured. Thus this error decreases with increasing signal intensity and when multiple
91
sweeps are pooled. Uncertainty in isobaric corrections is systematic and depends on the
S4
92
systematic uncertainty in the correction factors and on the time-varying relative intensity
93
of the isobaric signal to the total signal on the Cl isotope measurements.
94
95
Mass Bias
96
Both the value and the uncertainty in mass bias (β, equations 1 and S1) are difficult to
97
estimate. Note that β is a catch-all term that includes both mass-dependent discrimination
98
in the oven and mass spectrometer, and also imperfections in peak shape. Determination
99
of Cl isotopes was not a designed application of SAM, so neither an in-situ Cl isotope
100
standard nor a pre-launch calibration are available. SAM determined the 36Ar/38Ar ratio
101
of both terrestrial and Mars atmospheric Ar, and this ratio involves very similar mass
102
spectrometer bias effects (e.g., peak shape effects) to those relevant to the Cl isotope
103
ratio. On a pre-launch measurement with the SAM flight model a 38Ar/36Ar ratio of 0.189
104
± 0.001 was obtained on terrestrial air. This is within error (<5 ‰) of the accepted value
105
of 0.1883 ± 0.0002 (Renne et al., 2001). In addition, SAM measured (Atreya et al., 2013)
106
a Mars atmospheric 38Ar/36Ar ratio that is within stated error of the 38Ar/36Ar ratio
107
inferred from the trapped atmosphere component in martian meteorites (Wiens et al.,
108
1986). Both of these observations suggest that mass bias associated with the mass
109
spectrometric measurement is close to unity.
110
111
References
112
Atreya, S.K., Trainer, M.G., Franz, H.B., Wong, M.H., Manning, H.L.K., Malespin,
113
C.A., Mahaffy, P.R., Conrad, P.G., Brunner, A.E., Leshin, L.A., Jones, J.H.,
114
Webster, C.R., Owen, T.C., Pepin, R.O., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., 2013. Primordial
S5
115
argon isotope fractionation in the atmosphere of Mars measured by the SAM
116
instrument on Curiosity and implications for atmospheric loss. Geophysical
117
Research Letters 40, 5605-5609.
118
Farley, K.A., Malespin, C., Mahaffy, P., Grotzinger, J.P., Vasconcelos, P.M., Milliken,
119
R.E., Malin, M., Edgett, K.S., Pavlov, A.A., Hurowitz, J.A., Grant, J.A., Miller,
120
H.B., Arvidson, R., Beegle, L., Calef, F., Conrad, P.G., Dietrich, W.E.,
121
Eigenbrode, J., Gellert, R., Gupta, S., Hamilton, V., Hassler, D.M., Lewis, K.W.,
122
McLennan, S.M., Ming, D., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Schwenzer, S.P., Steele, A.,
123
Stolper, E.M., Sumner, D.Y., Vaniman, D., Vasavada, A., Williford, K.,
124
Wimmer-Schweingruber, R.F., Team, M.S., 2014. In Situ Radiometric and
125
Exposure Age Dating of the Martian Surface. Science 343.
126
Freissinet, C., Glavin, D.P., Mahaffy, P.R., Miller, K.E., Eigenbrode, J.L., Summons,
127
R.E., Brunner, A.E., Buch, A., Szopa, C., Archer, P.D., Franz, H.B., Atreya, S.K.,
128
Brinckerhoff, W.B., Cabane, M., Coll, P., Conrad, P.G., Des Marais, D.J.,
129
Dworkin, J.P., Fairen, A.G., Francois, P., Grotzinger, J.P., Kashyap, S., ten Kate,
130
I.L., Leshin, L.A., Malespin, C.A., Martin, M.G., Martin-Torres, F.J., McAdam,
131
A.C., Ming, D.W., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A.A., Prats, B.D., Squyres,
132
S.W., Steele, A., Stern, J.C., Sumner, D.Y., Sutter, B., Zorzano, M.P., Team,
133
M.S.L.S., 2015. Organic molecules in the Sheepbed Mudstone, Gale Crater, Mars.
134
Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets 120, 495-514.
135
Glavin, D.P., Freissinet, C., Miller, K.E., Eigenbrode, J.L., Brunner, A.E., Buch, A.,
136
Sutter, B., Archer, P.D., Atreya, S.K., Brinckerhoff, W.B., Cabane, M., Coll, P.,
137
Conrad, P.G., Coscia, D., Dworkin, J.P., Franz, H.B., Grotzinger, J.P., Leshin,
S6
138
L.A., Martin, M.G., McKay, C., Ming, D.W., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A.,
139
Steele, A., Summons, R.E., Szopa, C., Teinturier, S., Mahaffy, P.R., 2013.
140
Evidence for perchlorates and the origin of chlorinated hydrocarbons detected by
141
SAM at the Rocknest aeolian deposit in Gale Crater. Journal of Geophysical
142
Research-Planets 118, 1955-1973.
143
Ming, D.W., Archer, P.D., Glavin, D.P., Eigenbrode, J.L., Franz, H.B., Sutter, B.,
144
Brunner, A.E., Stern, J.C., Freissinet, C., McAdam, A.C., Mahaffy, P.R., Cabane,
145
M., Coll, P., Campbell, J.L., Atreya, S.K., Niles, P.B., Bell, J.F., Bish, D.L.,
146
Brinckerhoff, W.B., Buch, A., Conrad, P.G., Des Marais, D.J., Ehlmann, B.L.,
147
Fairen, A.G., Farley, K., Flesch, G.J., Francois, P., Gellert, R., Grant, J.A.,
148
Grotzinger, J.P., Gupta, S., Herkenhoff, K.E., Hurowitz, J.A., Leshin, L.A.,
149
Lewis, K.W., McLennan, S.M., Miller, K.E., Moersch, J., Morris, R.V., Navarro-
150
Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A.A., Perrett, G.M., Pradler, I., Squyres, S.W., Summons,
151
R.E., Steele, A., Stolper, E.M., Sumner, D.Y., Szopa, C., Teinturier, S., Trainer,
152
M.G., Treiman, A.H., Vaniman, D.T., Vasavada, A.R., Webster, C.R., Wray, J.J.,
153
Yingst, R.A., Team, M.S.L.S., 2014. Volatile and Organic Compositions of
154
Sedimentary Rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science 343.
155
156
157
Renne, P.R., Farley, K.A., Becker, T.A., Sharp, W.D., 2001. Terrestrial cosmogenic
argon. Earth Planet Sc Lett 188, 435-440.
Wiens, R.C., Becker, R.H., Pepin, R.O., 1986. The case for a martian origin of the
158
Shergottites .2. Trapped and indigenous gas components in EETA 79001 glass.
159
Earth Planet Sc Lett 77, 149-158.
160
S7
Download