1 Supplementary Text 2 3 Analytical Details 4 5 General 6 After drilling or scooping, ~50 to ~150 mg of sample is dropped into a quartz sample cup 7 which is then transported into an oven, evacuated, and heated monotonically over about 8 one hour to a temperature of ~900oC. The heating schedule varied somewhat among the 9 individual analyses, as did the ultimate temperature achieved; these differences have no 10 observable effect on Cl isotopic composition. During heating a He carrier gas sweeps 11 evolved gases into the SAM analytical suite, including a small split of the gas flow into 12 the QMS. The QMS has an electron impact ion source and a pulse-counting secondary 13 electron multiplier and can scan the entire mass range from 2 to 527 Da, although 14 typically a smaller mass range (e.g., 2-150 Da) is scanned during EGA sequences. The 15 QMS has a mass resolution of unity, so species with the same nominal mass-to-charge 16 ratio are not distinguished. As discussed below, this necessitates correction for isobaric 17 interferences. Correction is also required for SEM deadtime, which increases with count 18 rate. At about a million cps the correction is ~1%; for all Cl isotope measurements 19 reported here the deadtime correction is < 1.5%. 20 21 Isobaric Species 22 We compute Cl isotope ratios from the HCl peaks after making any necessary corrections 23 for isobaric species (see equation 1 and associated definition of variables in main text). S1 24 Potential isobars we have identified include Ar, hydrocarbons, oxygen, H2S, CS2 and 25 acetonitrile. Here we quantify these isobars and develop correction schemes as needed. 26 27 Compared to HCl, the amount of Ar present in the samples is negligible. The 28 geochronology experiment undertaken on the Cumberland sample by SAM (Farley et al., 29 2014) determined an 36Ar concentration of 55 pmol/g, compared with an EGA-based HCl 30 concentration in the same sample of ~7 mmol/g (Ming et al., 2014), yielding a 36Ar/HCl 31 ratio of less than 10 ppm. The same logic precludes a substantial contribution from 38Ar 32 on mass 38. Inspection of the abundances of parent ions indicates negligible contributions 33 to M38 from CS2 and acetonitrile. Similarly, the contribution to mass 36 from 18O18O is 34 extremely small – the natural abundance of 18O is just ~0.2%, so this isotopologue will be 35 just 4 ppm of the 16O16O signal at mass 32. The mass 32 signal in our samples includes 36 both 16O16O and 32S, so it provides an upper limit on the amount of O2 evolved from the 37 samples. 4 ppm of the mass 32 signal in our samples is always very small compared to 38 the total signal at mass 36. 39 40 Given these simplifications, the important isobars for Cl isotope ratio determination are 41 H234S, C3H2 and C3, so: 42 43 RCl= (M38 – kHC38M39)/ (M36 – ksM34 – kHC36M39) (S1) 44 45 We correct for H2S using the primary H2S signal at mass 34 (corrected for very minor 46 contributions from 18O16O) and the isotopic composition of sulfur (ks = 34S/32S ~ 0.0448). S2 47 Following previous work (Farley et al., 2014) we correct for hydrocarbons using the 48 C3H3 fragment at mass 39 (kHC38 = C3H2/C3H3 ~ 0.19, kHC36 = C3/C3H3 ~ 0.02). Below we 49 assign exact values and uncertainties to these correction factors. 50 51 Over the course of the EGA run the relative intensity of the isobars compared to the HCl 52 signal varies, causing highly time-variable uncertainties in the corrected HCl abundances 53 and the resulting isotopic ratios. Denoting the numerator of equation S1 as N and the 54 denominator as D, the uncertainty in Cl isotope ratio determined on a given sweep of the 55 mass spectrum is: 56 (σRCl/RCl) = [(σ(σ(σDD 57 58 59 where S2) 60 61 σ (σkHC38M39)2((σkHCkHC(σM39M39 (S3) 62 63 σD(σkSM34)2((σksks(σM34M34 64 kHC36M39)2((σkHC36kHC36(σM39M39 (S4) 65 66 67 SAM blank and background measurements indicate kHC36 varies between about 0.17 and 68 0.21, presumably reflecting small variations in the relative abundance of various organic 69 contaminants in the system. This limited variability in organic composition is further S3 70 supported by the near constancy of the purely hydrocarbon ratios M40/M39 and 71 M41/M39 within and between EGA runs. We adopt a best estimate of kHC38 = 0.19 ± 72 0.048 (1σ). Owing to the overwhelming abundance of HCl on mass 36 even in blank 73 runs, the value of kHC36 is difficult to determine directly. Based on runs with very high 74 organic concentrations (e.g, OD2; see below) and on the fragmentation pattern of likely 75 organic molecules in SAM (e.g., Freissinet et al., 2015; Glavin et al., 2013) we adopt a 76 value of kHC36 = 0.02 ±0.02. Modeling shows that selection of even a far higher value 77 (e.g., 0.1) would make a quantitative but not a qualitative difference to our results. 78 79 The isotopic composition of sulfur dictates kS; to accommodate possible isotopic 80 variability and mass bias we adopt a best estimate and uncertainty of kS=0.0448 ± 0.002. 81 In all of our samples the hydrocarbon correction greatly dominates the Cl isotope ratio 82 uncertainty. 83 84 Inspection of equations S2-S4 indicates three sources of uncertainty, arising from: a) the 85 instrumental bias; b) the absolute signal counts; and c) the isobar corrections. We believe 86 instrumental bias is a systematic uncertainty, and provide justification for this conclusion 87 below. Because it is systematic to all of our measurements, we do not include 88 instrumental bias explicitly in the following computations. The uncertainty associated 89 with absolute signal intensity is random, so declines with the total number of counts 90 measured. Thus this error decreases with increasing signal intensity and when multiple 91 sweeps are pooled. Uncertainty in isobaric corrections is systematic and depends on the S4 92 systematic uncertainty in the correction factors and on the time-varying relative intensity 93 of the isobaric signal to the total signal on the Cl isotope measurements. 94 95 Mass Bias 96 Both the value and the uncertainty in mass bias (β, equations 1 and S1) are difficult to 97 estimate. Note that β is a catch-all term that includes both mass-dependent discrimination 98 in the oven and mass spectrometer, and also imperfections in peak shape. Determination 99 of Cl isotopes was not a designed application of SAM, so neither an in-situ Cl isotope 100 standard nor a pre-launch calibration are available. SAM determined the 36Ar/38Ar ratio 101 of both terrestrial and Mars atmospheric Ar, and this ratio involves very similar mass 102 spectrometer bias effects (e.g., peak shape effects) to those relevant to the Cl isotope 103 ratio. On a pre-launch measurement with the SAM flight model a 38Ar/36Ar ratio of 0.189 104 ± 0.001 was obtained on terrestrial air. This is within error (<5 ‰) of the accepted value 105 of 0.1883 ± 0.0002 (Renne et al., 2001). In addition, SAM measured (Atreya et al., 2013) 106 a Mars atmospheric 38Ar/36Ar ratio that is within stated error of the 38Ar/36Ar ratio 107 inferred from the trapped atmosphere component in martian meteorites (Wiens et al., 108 1986). Both of these observations suggest that mass bias associated with the mass 109 spectrometric measurement is close to unity. 110 111 References 112 Atreya, S.K., Trainer, M.G., Franz, H.B., Wong, M.H., Manning, H.L.K., Malespin, 113 C.A., Mahaffy, P.R., Conrad, P.G., Brunner, A.E., Leshin, L.A., Jones, J.H., 114 Webster, C.R., Owen, T.C., Pepin, R.O., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., 2013. Primordial S5 115 argon isotope fractionation in the atmosphere of Mars measured by the SAM 116 instrument on Curiosity and implications for atmospheric loss. Geophysical 117 Research Letters 40, 5605-5609. 118 Farley, K.A., Malespin, C., Mahaffy, P., Grotzinger, J.P., Vasconcelos, P.M., Milliken, 119 R.E., Malin, M., Edgett, K.S., Pavlov, A.A., Hurowitz, J.A., Grant, J.A., Miller, 120 H.B., Arvidson, R., Beegle, L., Calef, F., Conrad, P.G., Dietrich, W.E., 121 Eigenbrode, J., Gellert, R., Gupta, S., Hamilton, V., Hassler, D.M., Lewis, K.W., 122 McLennan, S.M., Ming, D., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Schwenzer, S.P., Steele, A., 123 Stolper, E.M., Sumner, D.Y., Vaniman, D., Vasavada, A., Williford, K., 124 Wimmer-Schweingruber, R.F., Team, M.S., 2014. In Situ Radiometric and 125 Exposure Age Dating of the Martian Surface. Science 343. 126 Freissinet, C., Glavin, D.P., Mahaffy, P.R., Miller, K.E., Eigenbrode, J.L., Summons, 127 R.E., Brunner, A.E., Buch, A., Szopa, C., Archer, P.D., Franz, H.B., Atreya, S.K., 128 Brinckerhoff, W.B., Cabane, M., Coll, P., Conrad, P.G., Des Marais, D.J., 129 Dworkin, J.P., Fairen, A.G., Francois, P., Grotzinger, J.P., Kashyap, S., ten Kate, 130 I.L., Leshin, L.A., Malespin, C.A., Martin, M.G., Martin-Torres, F.J., McAdam, 131 A.C., Ming, D.W., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A.A., Prats, B.D., Squyres, 132 S.W., Steele, A., Stern, J.C., Sumner, D.Y., Sutter, B., Zorzano, M.P., Team, 133 M.S.L.S., 2015. Organic molecules in the Sheepbed Mudstone, Gale Crater, Mars. 134 Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets 120, 495-514. 135 Glavin, D.P., Freissinet, C., Miller, K.E., Eigenbrode, J.L., Brunner, A.E., Buch, A., 136 Sutter, B., Archer, P.D., Atreya, S.K., Brinckerhoff, W.B., Cabane, M., Coll, P., 137 Conrad, P.G., Coscia, D., Dworkin, J.P., Franz, H.B., Grotzinger, J.P., Leshin, S6 138 L.A., Martin, M.G., McKay, C., Ming, D.W., Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A., 139 Steele, A., Summons, R.E., Szopa, C., Teinturier, S., Mahaffy, P.R., 2013. 140 Evidence for perchlorates and the origin of chlorinated hydrocarbons detected by 141 SAM at the Rocknest aeolian deposit in Gale Crater. Journal of Geophysical 142 Research-Planets 118, 1955-1973. 143 Ming, D.W., Archer, P.D., Glavin, D.P., Eigenbrode, J.L., Franz, H.B., Sutter, B., 144 Brunner, A.E., Stern, J.C., Freissinet, C., McAdam, A.C., Mahaffy, P.R., Cabane, 145 M., Coll, P., Campbell, J.L., Atreya, S.K., Niles, P.B., Bell, J.F., Bish, D.L., 146 Brinckerhoff, W.B., Buch, A., Conrad, P.G., Des Marais, D.J., Ehlmann, B.L., 147 Fairen, A.G., Farley, K., Flesch, G.J., Francois, P., Gellert, R., Grant, J.A., 148 Grotzinger, J.P., Gupta, S., Herkenhoff, K.E., Hurowitz, J.A., Leshin, L.A., 149 Lewis, K.W., McLennan, S.M., Miller, K.E., Moersch, J., Morris, R.V., Navarro- 150 Gonzalez, R., Pavlov, A.A., Perrett, G.M., Pradler, I., Squyres, S.W., Summons, 151 R.E., Steele, A., Stolper, E.M., Sumner, D.Y., Szopa, C., Teinturier, S., Trainer, 152 M.G., Treiman, A.H., Vaniman, D.T., Vasavada, A.R., Webster, C.R., Wray, J.J., 153 Yingst, R.A., Team, M.S.L.S., 2014. Volatile and Organic Compositions of 154 Sedimentary Rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science 343. 155 156 157 Renne, P.R., Farley, K.A., Becker, T.A., Sharp, W.D., 2001. Terrestrial cosmogenic argon. Earth Planet Sc Lett 188, 435-440. Wiens, R.C., Becker, R.H., Pepin, R.O., 1986. The case for a martian origin of the 158 Shergottites .2. Trapped and indigenous gas components in EETA 79001 glass. 159 Earth Planet Sc Lett 77, 149-158. 160 S7