KBMA Tularemia Vaccine Progress Cerus Update June 18th 2007 Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 1 Cerus Milestones • Milestone 40: Phenotyping of F.t. novicida NER mutants » Measure attenuation of live uvr mutants in vitro, in macrophages, and in mice • Milestone 41: Optimization of photochemical treatment regimen and characterization of KBMA F.t. novicida » Establish photochemical inactivation regimen » Measure metabolic activity of uvr mutants after photochemical treatment » Determine the level of virulence of KBMA F. novicida • Milestone 42: Determine whether KBMA F.t. novicida vaccine protects against wild-type F.t. novicida challenge in mice » Vaccination route and regimen optimization, measure durability of protection • Milestone 43: Evaluation of genetically attenuated NER F.t. novicida strains as platform strains for KBMA vaccine » Screen 6 attenuated uvr double mutants for virulence attenuation and protective efficacy • Milestone 44: Formulation and evaluation of KBMA LVS » Establish photochemical inactivation regimen of selected uvr mutant of LVS » Measure metabolic activity and virulence of KBMA LVS • Milestone 45: Test vaccine efficacy of KBMA LVS in murine model » Measure level and durability of protection against LVS challenge, send to UNM • Milestone 46: Scale-up of KBMA LVS vaccine production » » » » • Optimize large–scale LVS culture conditions Establish 3L culture scale purification conditions, Optimize 3L scale photochemical inactivation process, Verify protective immunogenicity of vaccine candidates produced by large-scale process Milestone 47: Develop KBMA protocols to transfer to UNM for SchuS4-based vaccine Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 2 MS 40: Flow Diagram Milestone 40 Phenotyping of Ft novicida NER mutants Selection of Media for Growth of Ftn CDM for liquid CHAH for Agar Measure growth in vitro uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB vs U112 Measure growth in cells uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB vs U112 Measure virulence in mice uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB vs U112 Measure growth in mice uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB vs U112 All strains have identical growth rate in CDM All strains have identical growth rate in J774 cells All strains are still highly virulent by IP route Growth rate of U112 in lungs, livers, and spleens after IV administration completed NER mutants highly virulent by IV route but are slightly attenuated NER mutants not attenuated for growth in lungs, livers, and spleens after IV infection NER mutants are all ~1 log attenuated for virulence by SC route uvrB mutant appears to be attenuated for growth in lungs after SC administarion Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 3 MS 40: Summary of Progress on Phenotyping of Ftn NER mutants • Ft novicida uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB mutants do not have growth defects in CDM • Ft novicida uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB mutants do not have growth defects in J774 macrophages • WT, uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB strains are fully virulent by IP infection • WT, uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB strains were all highly virulent when administered IV, but mutants were ~1 log attenuated • Ft novicida uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB mutants do not have growth defects in mouse organs when administered IV • By SC administration uvrA, uvrB, and uvrAuvrB are attenuated by approximately 1 log compared to WT • Decreased virulence of uvrB may be due to decreased ability to disseminate to lungs, but replication rate is similar to WT Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 4 MS 40: Conclusions • Ft novicida NER mutants have no growth defects in vitro • Virulence attenuation is very subtle (at most 1 log) • All three NER-deficient strains of Ft novicida are indistinguishable • These data support selection of a single (uvrB) NER mutant for further development as a vaccine candidate • Limited attenuation supports the evaluation of secondary attenuating mutations (in MS 43) that would add safety feature to KBMA SchuS4-based Vaccine Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 5 MS 40: Next Steps • Prepare milestone completion report by end of June Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 6 MS 41: Optimization of Photochemical Treatment and Characterization of KBMA Ftn Milestone 41 Optimization of photochemical treatment regimen and Characterization of KBMA Ft novicida Determine minimal S-59 concentration required for complete inactivation uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB, vs U112 Determine the minimal UVA dose required for complete inactivation uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB, vs U112 Measure metabolic activity after photochemical treatment uvrA, uvrB, uvrAB, vs U112 Select optimal uvr candidate for further study uvrB 400mL scale inactivation process optimized Lot of KBMA uvrB produced QC of KBMA Ftn vaccine lots for sterility and metabolic activity Stability testing is ongoing Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 7 KBMA Ftn vaccine is attenuated in mice by IP, IV, and SC routes Milestone 42: Determine whether KBMA Ftn uvrB protects against lethal Ftn challenge MS 41: Progress on Optimization of Photochemical Treatment Regimen • Optimized S-59 and UVA doses at 3.5 mL scale » Minimum S-59 concentration required to inactivate ~1 x 1010 cfu – U112 = 40M – uvrA, uvrB, + uvrAuvrB = 20 M » 4 J/cm2 was the minimum dose of UVA required to achieve consistent inactivation (at 3.5 mL scale) » Metabolic activity profiles of all strains were similar • Optimized 400 mL scale inactivation conditions for uvrB » 40M S-59 + 7 J/cm2 UVA > 5x1010 inactivation » Sterile lots produced that have metabolic activity » MTS activity is stable at –80oC for 3 months (next time point is 6M) • KBMA uvrB are highly attenuated » >8 logs IP, ~8 logs IV, ~4 logs SC Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 8 MS 41: Conclusions • NER mutants of Ft novicida are only slightly more sensitive to PCT than WT • Phenotype of all NER mutants were identical: supports selection of single mutant (uvrB) for further development • KBMA uvrB are highly attenuated for virulence Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 9 MS 41: Next Steps • Continue QC on 400mL lot lot 948-202 of Ftn uvrB » Measure stability of lot at –80o C by MTS assay at 6 months • Because all strains have high degree of metabolic activity after PCT, suggests that NER genes are not induced » Will follow up by • Measure sensitivity to other DNA damaging agents (mitomycin C, doxorubicin, benzo[a]pyrene, and 4 nitroquinoline-N-oxide). • measuring uvrB gene induction after treatment with various • Initiated Milestone 42: Determine whether KBMA Ftn protect against wilt-type Ftn challenge Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 10 MS 42: Determine Whether KBMA Ftn Protect Against Wild-Type Ftn Challenge Milestone 42 Determine whether KBMA Ftn protect against wilt-type Ftn challenge: Vaccination route and regimen optimization Durability of protection established Compare protective efficacy of KBMA vaccine delivered by various routes Select optimal roue Determine optimal dose of KBMA vaccine required for complete protection Select dose Determine number and timing of vaccinations that provide highest degree of protection Select dosing regimen Determine the highest challenge dose for which protection is 100% Using optimal regimen Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 11 Measure the durability of protection using optimized route and regimen MS 42: Progress on POC Studies to Determine Whether Vaccination with KBMA Ftn is Protective Single Dose Ftn uvrB • LD50 of KBMA Ftn uvrB » SC >1x109, IP ~1x109, IV~1x108 • 100% protection against 100 x IP LD50 Ftn challenge (MTD 3d) » SC >1x109, IP 1x109, IV 1x108 Multiple dose Ftn uvrB • 100% protection against 100 x IP LD50 Ftn challenge after vaccination with 1x107 KBMA if administered 2 x separated by 3 weeks » 100% protection when CD8+ cells depleted prior to challenge » 80% protection when CD4+ cells depleted prior to challenge (MTD 6.5d) » 90% protection when CD4+ and CD8+ cells were depleted (MTD 7d) • These data suggest that CD4+ T cells contribute to protection » May provide help for humoral immunity • Passive transfer of 300ul serum resulted in 20% protection of group that received CD8-depleted serum and 1-2 day increase in MTD Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 12 Whole-Bug ELISA to measure humoral immunity to KBMA Ftn Anti-FT ELISA 7000 6000 Titer 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Naive Mock depleted CD4 depleted CD8 CD4+CD8 depleted depleted NB: 980-031 Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 13 MS 42: Conclusions • KBMA Ftn provides protection against U112 challenge with a single high (1x LD50) dose or two 0.1x LD50 doses • This may not be superior to Heat Killed • Immunity appears to be largely humoral, » Heat killed Ftn provide protection » CD4 T-cell depletion has a modest effect on survival that is CD8 independent » Survival after passive transfer of serum correlates with antibody titer Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 14 MS 42: Next Steps • In order to rank cellular immunity we have asked Karl Klose to construct an epitope-tagged strain of Ftn expressing an immunodominant CD8 epitope from ovalbumin (SIINFEKL) • Using this strain we can measure the ability of Ftn to induce cellular immunity • When we receive this strain we will compare Ftn immunogenicity to historical Lm immunogenicity • We will also use this tag to rank double mutant strains Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 15 MS 46: 3L-Scale Propagation of LVS Milestone 46 Scale-up of KBMA LVS vaccine production Select agar and liquid media that support robust growth and viability of LVS CHAH and CDM Develop 3L scale fermentation conditions for LVS CDM Sigma antifoam A Develop cryopreservation conditions for LVS 8% DMSO + 1% sucrose vs 10% sucrose Confirm preservation of LVS virulence Develop 3L scale photochemical inactivation conditions Monitor stability of frozen LVS Develop 3L scale purification conditions optimize TFF for LVS Demonstrate KBMA LVS is avirulent Demonstrate KBMA LVS protect against Lethal LVS challenge Confirm protective efficacy of KBMA LVS Produced by 3L-scale methods Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 16 MS 46: Summary of Progress on LVS Scale-Up • High efficiency of LVS cfu recovery on CHAH agar plates • Robust growth of DVC lot 16 LVS in CDM in shaker flasks » LVS expanded and frozen • 3L LVS grown in fermentor using CDM and Sigma antifoam A • Efficient LVS cryopreservation in 8% DMSO or 10% sucrose » Up to 4 month stability • LVS virulence established by 3 routes » Cerus IP LD50 range 1x103-3x104 v.s. Green et. al 2005: 4x100 » Cerus expanded LVS is ~10x more virulent than DVC lot 16 » Cerus IV LD50 range 3x103-7x104 v.s. Green et. al 2005 2.2x104 » Cerus SC LD50 > 1.26 x108 v.s. Green et. al 2005 1.3x109 Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 17 MS 46: Summary of KBMA WT LVS data • Produced 400mL lot of KBMA LVS (968-040) for proof of concept studies prior to receiving NER mutant from UTSA • KBMA LVS maintained metabolic activity for >12 hours after PCT » Stability of metabolic activity ongoing • KBMA LVS IV LD50 is 6.8x108 » attenuated for virulence by 4-5 logs compared with live • Single dose of KBMA LVS provided 100% protection against 100xLD50 IP LVS challenge with doses as low as 1x107 » Heat killed was equivalent, suggesting that LVS protection was humoral » Sent vials of KBMA LVS to Terry Wu for SchuS4 challenge studies Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 18 MS 46: Stability of Metabolic Activity of KBMA LVS Nominal 1e8 particle/mL (KBMA) F. tularensis holarctica LVS 1.0 0.9 OD (490nm) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 T=0 968-040 Arm-1 (10uM S-59, 6J/cm2 UVA) T=1 968-040 Arm-1 (10uM S-59, 6J/cm2 UVA) T=2 698-040 Arm-1 (10uM S-59, 6J/cm2 UVA) " T=3 968-040 Arm-1 (10uM S-59, 6J/cm2 UVA) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (hours) NB968-105 • No decrease in metabolic activity after 3 months of storage Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 19 MS 46: LVS Cellular Immunogenicity • Goal: measure T-cell response to vaccination with KBMA LVS • Dr. Jeff Frelinger's group isolated a C57Bl/6 mouse CD4+ T cell clone that reacted to the Ft Tul4 protein (RLQWQAPEGSKCHDTS). • We had this peptide synthesized and attempted to measure the number of T-Cells that respond to this peptide by intracellular interferon-gamma (IFN-) cytokine staining (ICS) or ELISpot assay. Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 20 MS 46: LVS Cellular Immunogenicity IM07-058 Day 0 200 ul HBSS 1e3 Live LVS 934-070 1e8 KBMA LVS 968-040 arm1 Day 7 B6 Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 21 Harvest spleens, single cells suspension. ICS + ELISpot ICS Data Ft peptide CD4 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 %IFNg+CD4+ %IFNg+CD4+ Unstim CD4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 HBSS LVS KBMA HBSS Immunization KBMA Immunization Unstim CD8 Ft peptide CD8 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 %IFNg+CD8+ %IFNg+CD8+ LVS 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 HBSS LVS Immunization Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 22 KBMA 0.0 HBSS LVS Immunization KBMA ELISpot Data Unstim Ft peptide 100 SFU per 2e5 cells SFU per 2e5 cells 100 80 60 40 20 80 60 40 20 0 0 HBSS LVS Immunization KBMA HBSS LVS KBMA Immunization • LVS appears to non-specifically increase the number of IFN-producing cells Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 23 MS 46: Cellular Immunity Conclusions • There was no significant tul-4 peptide-specific increase in IFNproducing cells by ICS or ELIspot » Neither Live nor KBMA LVS induced a response » May be a very weak peptide • Will loaded DCs with peptide to see if peptide can be presented • Also will perform heterologous prime-boost with peptide loaded DC Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 24 MS 46: Next Steps • We will continue to monitor stability of fermentor-grown live LVS in “freeze buffer” vs 10% sucrose » At 6 and 12 months » We will compare the virulence of fermentor-grown LVS stored in “freeze buffer”or 10% sucrose, to expanded and freshly suspended DVC lot 16 • We will monitor the stability of photochemically inactivated lot of LVS in 10% sucrose » Monthly by MTS assays (at 6,12 months) • Will vaccinate with lower doses to determine whether KBMA LVS provides any benefit over HK against LVS challenge Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 25 Action Items: Cerus 6/18/07 Tech call • Action: Barbara contacted Karl Klose on 6/18/07 and Cerus thereafter did receive the uvrB LVS mutant from UTSA. (completed) • Action: Justin will prepare the MS 40 Milestone completion report by the end of June, or even middle of July • Action: Barbara ask Karl if willing to let Justin screen the SINFEKL in parallel with Karl’s Western. (Note: Karl responded that he prefers to fully test the construct in his lab before sharing with other labs) (completed) • Action: Barbara ask Rick if we wish to ship aliquots of ASU’s predicted immunodominant peptides to Cerus. (discussed with Rick at 7/6 Internal Tech Meeting) Tech Call, 18 June 2007, Page 26