Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Contract No. HHSN266200500040-C ADB Contract No. N01-AI-50040 Section I: Purpose and Scope of Effort The Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract will lead to vaccine candidates, two animal models and cellular assays vital for testing vaccine efficacy. Sections II and III: Progress and Planning Presented by Milestone Active milestones: 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12/13(UNM/LBERI), 14, 17, 19, 21(UNM/LBERI), 26, 27, 28, 35(ASU/UNM), 49, 50, 52, 55, 56, 57 Completed milestones: 1, 25, 32, 33, 34 (UNM/ASU), 16, 39, 40, 43 (UTSA), 48, 51 Inactive milestones: 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30, 36, 37, 38, 53, 54, 58, 59 Milestones terminated after initiation: 41, 42, 44, 46, (MSCR will be written) Milestones terminated before initiated: 43 (Cerus), 45, 47 (MSCR will not be written) Milestone 2 Milestone description: Vaccinations performed on relevant personnel Institution: UNM/LRRI 1. Date started: 11/01/2005 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Caryl Trotter confirmed that UNM EOH will begin the annual health screenings for the 37 LVS vaccinees in September 2008. b. Heidi Holley, NIAID Contract Specialist, determined that no COA was required for the annual health screening costs associated with the LVS vaccinees. 4. Significant decisions made or pending a. Dr. Lyons received UNM IRB approval to allow blood draws on the vaccinated LBERI and UNM scientists after their LVS vaccinations. The LVS vaccinated LBERI and UNM scientists and staff have been offered the opportunity to volunteer to donate bloods for the development of immunoassays, approximately 2 months after receiving the LVS vaccination. b. USAMRIID has temporarily halted offering the LVS vaccine as of 4/29/08, until a new study protocol is activated, possibly by late summer 2008 c. UNM (4) and LBERI (33) are vaccinated; UNM and LBERI could offer the LVS vaccinations up to 9 more scientists to total up to 46. The CRDA with USAMRIID is valid for 2 years, ending June 2009. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address a. One UNM and one LBERI scientist are medically pending. One UNM scientist may be rescheduled for LVS vaccination. The next LVS vaccinations will not Page 1 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble occur until USAMRIID’s new protocol is activated approximately late summer 2008 6. Deliverables completed A total of 37 participants (33 LBERI and 4 UNM participants) have received the LVS vaccination since 9/11/07. 7. Quality of performance Excellent 8. Percentage completed 68% of the scientific work is complete 9. Work plan for the next month a. Obtain an NIAID contract authorization to allow UNM EOHS to charge for the annual health screening required by USAMRIID and being performed at UNM for the LBERI and UNM LVS vaccinees. b. UNM will be obtaining blood donations from LVS vaccinees for immunoassay development and reimbursing participants $40/ donation. 10. Anticipated travel Will be attending the UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ in October 2008. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 3 Milestone description: Bioaerosol technique selected and optimized Institution: LBERI 1. Date started: 2/23/2006 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Work was continued on the milestone completion report. The draft report will be completed prior to the next NIAID teleconference scheduled for 9/2/2008. b. SCHU S4 bioaerosols were conducted on four days in July 2008. The goal is to select an aerosol generator that reproducibly generates a targeted and delivered SCHU S4 aerosol dose. SCHU S4 bioaerosols were generated and compared using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers (4 Hospitak nebulizers and 3 Collison nebulizers). a. 7/1/2008 i. Completed SCHU S4 bioaerosol testing (number of sprays=8) using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. ii. Objectives were to demonstrate the predictability of the standardized SCHU S4 growth method and to compare SCHU S4 bioaerosol efficacy between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. iii. Growth method used for SCHU S4: 1. Inoculate BCGA for colony isolation 2. Incubate for 48h at 37°C 3. Inoculate 100 mL of Chamberlain’s broth in a previously unused, sterile 500 mL baffled flask with 400 uL of suspension. The suspension is prepared from multiple Page 2 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble colonies mixed in 4.5 mL broth and normalized to an OD600 of 0.100. 4. Incubate for 24h at 37°C, 200 rpm, in the dark 5. Read OD600; compare to growth curve and dilute to appropriate concentrations iv. Results (stored in the following folder: \\Saturn\absl3\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY06\FY06-078_TUL-03\TUL-03 data files\Collison Generator\01JUL08 are summarized in Table 1 below: Table 1. 1JUL08 summary SCHU S4 bioaerosol results using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Numerous conclusions can be drawn from the data presented in Table 1: (1) Generator suspensions (pre-sprays; pre-actuals column in table 1) were close to the target concentrations demonstrating accurate predictability of our SCHU S4 growth method. (2) Post-actual bioaerosol concentrations were slightly lower than pre- actual bioaerosol titers (an observation consistently observed regardless of the nebulizer used) demonstrating the fragility of SCHU S4. (3) Aerosol concentrations (CFU/L) were slightly higher with the Hospitak. These higher concentrations were likely due to the increased viability retention associated with the Hospitak. Of significant interest is that a consistent increase in aerosol concentration (CFU/L column) was observed with increased generator suspension (pre-actual); this demonstrates that aerosol concentrations may be targeted rather than only generator suspension concentrations being targeted in future animal challenges. (4) Spray factors were similar to those observed previously with the Collison, but were lower and more inconsistent with the Hospitak. This latter observation was likely inherent to the nebulizer chosen for that day. It is unclear, however, how to pre-screen for the consistency of the individual Hospitak nebulizers. Page 3 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble b. 7/9/2008 i. Completed SCHU S4 bioaerosol testing (number of sprays=8) using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. ii. Objectives were to demonstrate the predictability of the standardized SCHU S4 growth method and to compare SCHU S4 bioaerosol efficacy between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. iii. Growth method used for SCHU S4: 1. Inoculate BCGA for colony isolation 2. Incubate for 48h at 37°C 3. Inoculate 100 mL of Chamberlain’s broth in a previously unused, sterile 500 mL baffled flask with 400 uL of suspension. The suspension is prepared from multiple colonies mixed in 4.5 mL broth and normalized to an OD600 of 0.100. 4. Incubate for 24h at 37°C, 200 rpm, in the dark 5. Read OD600; compare to growth curve and dilute to appropriate concentrations iv. Results (stored in the following folder: \\Saturn\absl3\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY06\FY06-078_TUL-03\TUL-03 data files\Collison Generator\09JUL08 are summarized in Table 2 below: Table 2. 9JUL08 summary SCHU S4 bioaerosol results using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Numerous conclusions can be drawn from the data presented in Table 2: (1) As before, generator suspensions (pre-sprays; pre actual column in table 2 above) were close to the target concentrations demonstrating accurate predictability of our SCHU S4 growth method. (2) Post- actual bioaerosol concentrations were slightly lower than pre- actual bioaerosol titers (an observation consistently observed regardless of the nebulizer used) demonstrating the fragility of SCHU S4. (3) Aerosol concentrations (CFU/L) were slightly higher with the Hospitak. These higher concentrations were likely due to the increased Page 4 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble viability retention associated with the Hospitak. Of significant interest is that a consistent increase in aerosol concentration was observed with increased generator concentration; this demonstrates that aerosol concentrations may be targeted rather than only generator suspension concentrations in future animal challenges. (4) Spray factors were virtually the same for both nebulizers. This was in contrast to the 1JUL08 observations. It can be hypothesized that the Hospitak chosen for the July 9 bioaerosols met the criteria (currently an unknown variable) necessary to result in efficient SCHU S4 spray generation. c. 7/24/2008 i. Completed SCHU S4 bioaerosol testing (number of sprays=6) using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. ii. Objectives were to demonstrate the predictability of the standardized SCHU S4 growth method and to compare SCHU S4 bioaerosol efficacy between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Focus was on use of a different Collison unit than used for previous experiments. iii. Growth method used for SCHU S4: 1. Inoculate BCGA for colony isolation 2. Incubate for 48h at 37°C 3. Inoculate 100 mL of Chamberlain’s broth in a previously unused, sterile 500 mL baffled flask with 400 uL of suspension. The suspension is prepared from multiple colonies mixed in 4.5 mL broth and normalized to an OD600 of 0.100. 4. Incubate for 24h at 37°C, 200 rpm, in the dark 5. Read OD600; compare to growth curve and dilute to appropriate concentrations iv. Results (stored in the following folder: \\Saturn\absl3\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY06\FY06-078_TUL-03\TUL-03 data files\Collison Generator\24JUL08 are summarized in Table 3 below: Page 5 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Table 3. 24JUL08 summary SCHU S4 bioaerosol results using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Numerous conclusions can be drawn from the data presented in Table 3: (1) As before, generator suspensions (pre-actual) were close to the target concentrations demonstrating accurate predictability of our SCHU S4 growth method. (2) Post-actual bioaerosol concentrations were slightly lower than pre-actual bioaerosol titers (an observation consistently observed regardless of the nebulizer used) demonstrating the fragility of SCHU S4. (3) Aerosol concentrations (CFU/L) were similar between the two nebulizers. Of significant interest is that the a consistent increase in aerosol concentration was observed with increased generator concentration; this demonstrates that aerosol concentrations may be targeted rather than only generator suspension concentrations in future animal challenges. (4) Spray factors were similar to those observed previous with the Collison, but were lower and more inconsistent with the Hospitak. This latter observation was likely inherent to the specific Hospitak nebulizer chosen for that day. These data are similar to those obtained on 1JUL08. The inconsistencies in the spray factors associated with the Hospitak may negate its occasional good performance. In contrast to this, data indicate the Collison may be slightly less efficient than the Hospitak, but is more consistent based on the spray factors. d. 7/25/2008 i. Completed SCHU S4 bioaerosol testing (number of sprays=6) using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. ii. Objectives were to demonstrate the predictability of the standardized SCHU S4 growth method and to compare SCHU S4 bioaerosol efficacy between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Focus was on use of a different Collison unit than used for previous experiments. iii. Growth method used for SCHU S4: 1. Inoculate BCGA for colony isolation 2. Incubate for 48h at 37°C Page 6 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 3. Inoculate 100 mL of Chamberlain’s broth in a previously unused, sterile500 mL baffled flask with 400 uL of suspension. The suspension is prepared from multiple colonies mixed in 4.5 mL broth and normalized to an OD600 of 0.100. 4. Incubate for 24h at 37°C, 200 rpm, in the dark 5. Read OD600; compare to growth curve and dilute to appropriate concentrations iv. Results (stored in the following folder: \\Saturn\absl3\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY06\FY06-078_TUL-03\TUL-03 data files\Collison Generator\25JUL08 are summarized in Table 4 below: Table 4. 25JUL08 summary SCHU S4 bioaerosol results using the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Numerous conclusions can be drawn from the data presented in Table 4: (1) As before, generator suspensions (pre- actuals) were close to the target concentrations demonstrating accurate predictability of our SCHU S4 growth method. (2) Post- actual bioaerosol concentrations were slightly lower than pre- actual bioaerosol titers (an observation consistently observed regardless of the nebulizer used) demonstrating the fragility of SCHU S4. (3) Aerosol concentrations (CFU/L) were similar between the two nebulizers. Of significant interest is that the a consistent increase in aerosol concentration was observed with increased generator concentration; this demonstrates that aerosol concentrations may be targeted rather than only generator suspension concentrations in future animal challenges. (4) Spray factors were similar between the two nebulizers. The data from Tables 1-4 were compiled along with aerosol runs from 23JUN08 and 30Jun2008 (presented in the Previous Milestone 3 Monthly Report), and were averaged. Standard deviations were determined and the results were graphed (see Figures 1-4 below). Page 7 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 1. Comparison of Targeted vs. Actual Prespray Concentrations in Six Head to Head Experiments with the Hospitak and Collison Nebulizers This graph (Figure 1) represents data collected across the June 23 to July 25 bioaerosols. The targeted pre-spray concentrations for both the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers are achieved over the 106 to 109 stepwise log range targeted. Thus, LBERI is able to accurately predict the Prespray concentration of the bacterial suspension for aerosol generation (i.e. the suspension placed into the nebulizer). Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL04)\NHP Pilot Studies Page 8 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 2. Comparison of Bacterial Recovery after Aerosol Runs in Six Head to Head Experiments with the Hospitak and Collison Nebulizers This graph (Figure 2) represents data collected across the June 23 to July 25 bioaerosols. The percentage of bacteria recovered after aerosol runs (represented as the Postspray as a percentage of the Prespray) demonstrate that there is no significant difference between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers, though the trend is slightly higher in the Hospitak. Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL-04)\NHP Pilot Studies Page 9 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 3. Comparison of Log Impinger Concentrations in Six Head to Head Experiments with the Hospitak and Collison Nebulizers This graph (Figure 3) represents data collected across the June 23 to July 25 bioaerosols. The percentage of bacteria recovered from the AGI demonstrates that there is no significant difference between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers, though the trend is slightly higher at lower generator concentrations in the Hospitak. Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL-04)\NHP Pilot Studies Page 10 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 4. Comparison of Bacterial Recovery from the Impinger in Six Head to Head Experiments with the Hospitak and Collison Nebulizers This graph (Figure 4) represents data collected across the June 23 to July 25 bioaerosols. The percentage of bacteria recovered from the AGI as a percentage of the Prespray indicates that large numbers of bacteria do not survive the aerosolization process and that SCHU S4 in particular is very fragile. It also demonstrates that there is no significant difference between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers. Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL04)\NHP Pilot Studies 4. Significant decisions made or pending a. Based on consistent data over the last 2 months, the SCHU S4 growth method has been finalized to the procedure outlined in each section above. b. Data from 6 head to head comparisons between the Hospitak and Collison nebulizers has been compiled and no statistical difference exists between the Page 11 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble c. two. Smaller standard deviations in spray factors were observed with the Collison nebulizer. The Collison, therefore, will be used for all future SCHU S4 bioaerosols. Data from this milestone are scientifically sound and worth publishing. We will look to doing so in a reputable journal in the near future. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 99.5% of the scientific work is complete 9. Work plan for next month a. Complete the Milestone Completion Draft Report b. Update draft SOPs and move to finalization 10. Anticipated travel Will attend UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ in October 2008. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None anticipated Milestone 4 Milestone description: Confirmation of aerosol in vivo in NHP Institution: LBERI 1. Date started: 11/1/06 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions: Bioaerosol Challenge: A bioaerosol challenge with two additional primates (A04643 and A04645) was performed on 15JUL08 to confirm that aerosolized SCHU S4 freshly grown in Chamberlain’s broth is virulent in NHPs. The focus for study was to ensure lethal disease progression at high presented dose. Therefore, the generator suspension concentration was increased significantly from the previous two challenge days (1 x 109 CFU/mL on 7/15/08 vs. 1 x 107 CFU/mL prior dates). The nebulizer used for this study was the Hospitak. The data (summarized in Table 1) is located in the following folder: \\Saturn\absl3\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL04)\15JUL08 NHP exposure. Page 12 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Table 1: Challenge data for animals A04643 and A04645, naïve cynomolgus macaques exposed to an aerosol challenge of Francisella tularensis SCHU S4. F. tularensis Date 15-Jul-08 Strain Working Stock SCHU S4 28-Feb-08 Nebulizer Animal ID Brand Operating Pressure Output A04643 Hospitak 10.0 psig 4.75 L/min A04645 Hospitak 10.0 psig 4.75 L/min CFU/mL Target PreActual PostActual CFU/L Presented Dose (CFU) PreSpray Factor PostSpray Factor 1.00E+09 2.92E+09 1.43E+09 4.87E+04 2.36E+05 5.23E-09 3.42E-08 1.00E+09 3.70E+09 1.45E+09 2.61E+05 1.09E+06 7.05E-08 1.80E-07 Data from Table 1 demonstrates that animals A04643 and A04645 were challenged with presented doses of 2.36 x 105 and 1.09 x 106 CFU, respectively. Actual generator suspensions (pre-actual column) were very close to the target of 1.00 x 10 9 CFU/mL demonstrating consistency with the SCHU S4 growth method. Exposure times were 8.63 and 8.30 minutes for A04643 and A04645, respectively. In-life Study Portion: The animals in Pilot 3, A04643 and A04645, were aerosol challenged using a Hospitak nebulizer with SCHU S4 grown as described above in Milestone 3. The doses of viable bacteria presented to each animal were 2.36 x 105 and 1.09 x 106, respectively. Animal A04643 developed clinical signs within 24 hours of exposure as demonstrated by a respiratory rate of over 80 respirations per minute (Figure 1), markedly increased from a baseline of 40. By 48 hours post-infection, this animals’ respiratory rate had climbed to 120 respirations per minute. A04643 vomited twice within that time and its biscuit intake nearly ceased, though fruit and vegetable enrichment was still ingested. At approximately 70 hours, A04643 displayed severe weakness and ataxia as well as respiratory distress (gasping), then fell off the perch and died on the bottom of the cage before personnel trained to perform euthanasia could arrive. Animal A04645 developed clinical signs within 48 hours of exposure. Its respiratory rate increased to 88 respirations per minute (normal rate = 45, Figure 1), and a non-productive cough was observed. By 72 hours post-infection, A04645’s respiratory rate had increased to above 80 per minute and the cough was more pronounced. By 9 pm that evening (study day 3) this animal also developed marked weakness, ataxia, and respiratory distress (gasping); it fainted while being chaired for temperature readings. Similar to the other animal, this monkey fell off of the perch and died on the floor of the cage before the Study Director could be contacted to arrange euthanasia. A04645 also nearly ceased eating biscuits, but did continue to eat fruit and vegetable enrichment. Neither animal displayed weight loss over 20%, nor did either develop a clear fever. In fact, both animals’ temperatures decreased as the disease progressed to death (Figure 2). Both animals had large numbers of SCHU S4 within lung and TBLNs (Table 2). The spleen and liver of both were colonized with fewer numbers than lung and TBLN (2-4 logs less, Table 2), while only small numbers of bacteria were recovered from blood and mesenteric lymph nodes. This is likely indicative of primary pulmonary disease with minimal progression to the bacteremic state. Hence, death was due to pulmonary disease. Lungs from each animal are shown below (Figure 3 and 4). Pathology reports are pending at this time. Page 13 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Table 2: Blood and tissue culture data for animals A04643 and A04645, naïve Cynomolgus macaques exposed to an aerosol challenge of Francisella tularensis SCHU S4. FY07-083 Naïve Cynomolgus macaque Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 Bioaerosol Challenge Data Animal ID Challenge Date Presented Dose (CFU) Necropsy Datea Bloodb Spleen Liver TBLNc Mes LN Lung A04643 15-July-08 2.36E+05 18-July-08 1620 5.87E+04 4.15E+04 2.64E+08 9.46E+02 5.53E+08 A04645 15-July-08 1.09E+06 18-July-08 125 8.88E+05 6.26E+04 6.28E+07 2.05E+02 2.35E+08 Tissue Culture a both animals died before personnel could reach them to euthanize b Blood data presented as CFU/mL; tissue data presented as CFU/g; A04643 blood was taken from chest wall pool after aorta was nicked on necropsy, A04645 blood was taken from the heart c In addition to F. tularensis, one contaminant (one to two colonies per plate) was noted in the liver of A04645, currently being characterized A. B. Figure 1. Post-exposure respiration rate by animal for Pilot 3. A is animal A04643 and B is animal A04645 Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL-04)\NHP Pilot Studies Page 14 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble A. B. Figure 2. Post-exposure temperatures by animal for Pilot 3. A is animal A04643 and B is animal A04645. Data is stored in Z:\Agent and Study Specific Data and Miscellaneous Documents\STUDY SPECIFIC DATA\FY07\FY07-083 and -089 (TUL-04)\NHP Pilot Studies Page 15 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble A. B. Figure 3: Lung images from animal A04643. A and B images represent ventral and dorsal aspects, respectively. Page 16 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble A. B. Figure 4: Lung images from animal A04645. A and B images represent ventral and dorsal aspects, respectively. 4. Significant decisions made or pending Dr. Lyons, prior to aerosol exposure of the third cohort of animals, made the decision to expose them to the highest possible concentration of SCHU S4 achievable without centrifugation. Thus, 1e9 bacteria were used for the generator suspension (pre-actual). As both animals died within 3 days post-exposure, LBERI has achieved a lethal aerosol SCHU S4 dose in NHP and has observed clinical signs and symptoms of primary pneumonic disease in NHP. LBERI is prepared to move forward with ED50 studies. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None. Page 17 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 6. Deliverables completed The Milestone 4 report is presently being written. Pathology reports are still outstanding for Pilots 2 and 3. 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 90% of the scientific work is complete 9. Work plan for next month a. Work on the Milestone Completion Report will continue. 10. Anticipated travel 11. Will attend UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ in October 2008.Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None anticipated Milestone 5 - UNM Milestone description: Small species tested for sensitivity to LVS & generation of immunity against a pulmonary challenge of SCHU S4 Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 12/12/2005 2. Date completed: pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. We have been consulting with Dr. Ron Schrader, a biostatistician at UNM, to perform statistical analyses on the data collected thus far on the Fischer 344 rat model. The preliminary results of our analyses are located L:\Lyonslab\Tularemia\Tularemia manuscripts\Rat paper\Stats i. We would like to make recommendations on the LVS vaccination route and dose, SCHU S4 challenge dose, and group size ii. According to Dr. Schrader, the experiments we have performed thus far are very similar and could be analyzed as a single data set. By combining the experiments and thereby the number of samples, the experimental power is increased. iii. His analyses indicated that LVS vaccination by s.c., i.d. and i.t. routes all provided significant protection against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge compared with unvaccinated rat controls. The protective effects of i.d. and s.c. vaccinations were similar and both were slightly better than i.t. vaccination. iv. He transformed the discontinuous survival data from unvaccinated rats challenged i.t. with SCHU S4 into a continuous baseline proportional hazard regression curve reflecting the survivability at all doses within the dose range analyzed. He then determined the impact of i.d., s.c., and i.t. LVS vaccination and SCHU S4 challenge on this baseline curve. v. Figure 1 shows the proportional hazard regression curves of unvaccinated and i.d., s.c., and i.t. vaccinated rats at various SCHU S4 challenged doses. The curves predicated that 90% of unvaccinated rats would die from i.t. challenge with 10 5 SCHU S4 but Page 18 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble only 10% of the s.c. and i.d. vaccinated rats and 20% of the i.t. vaccinated rats would die from the same challenge dose. Even with an i.t. challenge dose of 107 SCHU S4, the regression model predicated only 30% of the i.d. and s.c. vaccinated rats and 50% of the i.t. vaccinated rats to die. At all doses examined empirically in the laboratory, i.t. vaccination resulted in lower survival vi. The proportional hazard regression analyses also allowed us to determine the group size required to detect a protective effect. If the level of protection is expected to be as large as that induced by LVS vaccination, then 6 rats per group is sufficient. If the level of protection is expected to be smaller than that induced by LVS, then 7 rats per group is sufficient vii. We are continuing the statistical analyses because the model may be too conserve with the unvaccinated rats. Specifically, the actual data from Experiments Ftc23, Ftc31, Ftc 32, Ptran2, Ptran6, and Ptran7.1 (Fig 2) showed that at least 80% of unvaccinated rats died from i.t. challenge with 103 SCHU S4, but the statistical model projected that only 60% would die at this dose. Figure 1. Proportional hazard regression curves for unvaccinated, i.d., s.c., and i.t. LVS vaccinated Fischer 344 rats Page 19 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 2. Survival of unvaccinated rats following i.t. challenge with various doses of SCHU S4. Each panel shows the results of a single experiment, except the panel on the lower right which shows the results of the unvaccinated rats from 4 independent experiments. b. Characterization of the Fischer 344 rat model is currently being done under Milestone 11, as the efforts on the Fischer 344 rat model are shifting toward GLP model efficacy 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed a. Mouse model completed b. Guinea pig model completed c. Rat model completed 7. Quality of performance NA 8. Percentage completed 78% Page 20 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. We showed in Experiment Ftc46 study 6 (Notebook 116, pages 12-17) and Experiment Ftc46 study 7 (Notebook 116, pages 18-21) that quantum dots and the coelentrazine substrate had little impact the virulence of LVS in mice. We will determine whether they have any effect on the virulence of SCHU S4 in rats b. Complete sub-milestone completion reports for the mouse, rat, and guinea pigs c. Continue consultation with GCRC (General Clinical Research Center) biostatistician at UNM 10. Anticipated travel Will attend UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ on October 6 and 7, 2008 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 7 Milestone description: SCHU S4 ED50 in primates determined from selection of challenge dosing Institution: LBERI 1. Date started: 2/25/08 2. Date completed: In progress. 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions: a. The IACUC protocol was re-written and re-submitted for approval on 23 July 08. Approval is pending. Study schedule, observation forms, and euthanasia score sheets have been prepared in preparation for this study. LBERI training personnel have been contacted by the Study Director in preparation for additional training (see below). 4. Significant decisions made or pending Twelve NHP will tentatively move into the ABSL3 on 15 September 08; a range of SCHU S4 exposures are tentatively set for 23 and 24 of September 08. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address Additional technical personnel will be trained on determining respiratory rates in NHP and signed off on proficiency prior to the ED50 study. 6. Deliverables completed None. 7. Quality of performance Good. 8. Percentage completed 12% of the scientific work is complete. 9. Work plan for next month a. Schedule appropriate personnel and confirm animal ID’s for use on study with Julie Wilder, taking into account F. tularensis pre-existing antibody responses. Physical exams, collars and microchipping to be scheduled. b. Present the ED50 draft study protocol to Rick Lyons at UNM 10. Anticipated travel None. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None anticipated. Page 21 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 11 - UNM Milestone description: In vivo GLP model efficacy SOPS developed in one small species and primate and efficacy testing of vaccine candidates Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 1/16/2008 2. Date completed: pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Experiment Ftc71 (Notebook 104, pages 152-153) i. In mice, guinea pigs, non-human primates, and humans, protection against SCHU S4 is dependent on the dose of LVS used for vaccination ii. The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the dose of LVS affects the protection against SCHU S4 in Fischer 344 rats iii. Fischer 344 rats were either left unvaccinated or vaccinated s.c. with 103, 105 or 107 LVS; the 107 dose has been our standard vaccinated dose. One month after LVS vaccination, the rats were challenged i.t. with 105 SCHU S4. iv. As shown in Fig 3, most of the rats died from i.t. challenge with 105 SCHU S4, regardless of the LVS vaccination dose. We did not expect 8 of the 10 rats vaccinated with 107 LVS to die from this challenge dose since all rats vaccinated and challenged similarly in Experiment Ftc23 and Ftc32 survived. The difference between this and the two previous experiments was that we used newer stocks of both LVS and SCHU S4 . In this case, it is hard to know if the vaccination failed or the challenge dose was too high.. So UNM is repeating the experiment but challenging with multiple doses. UNM also has several new LVS stocks and a new SCHU S4 stock that we are testing now. v. Figure 3. Effect of LVS vaccination dose on survival of Fischer 344 rats challenged i.t. with SCHU S4. Fischer 344 rats (n = 9 to 10) were vaccinated s.c. Page 22 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble with the indicated doses of LVS. One month after vaccination, the rats were challenged i.t. with 105 SCHU S4 b. To determine the role of CD4 and CD8 T cells in protecting LVS vaccinated rats against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge, we purchased the W3/25 (anti-CD4) and the OX-8 (anti-CD8) hybridoma cell lines to produce ascites fluids for in vivo depletion of CD4 and CD8 T cells. We were not aware at the time that the antibodies produced by the W3/25 hybridoma cell line only inactivate but does not deplete CD4 T cells. This prevented us from confirming the CD4 T cell depletion in Experiment Cdep-2.1. Thus, we purchased the CD4depleting OX-38 hybridoma (mouse IgG2a) and the isotype control 55.6 hybridoma (mouse IgG2a anti-HIV-1 gp120). We will contract with Taconic to produce ascites fluids from these cell lines 3. Significant decisions made or pending None 4. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 5. Deliverables completed None 6. Quality of performance Good 7. Percentage completed 21% 8. Work plan for upcoming month a. Repeat the experiment to determine the effect of LVS vaccination dose on the protection of rats to SCHU S4 challenge. We will use 2 challenge doses, 104 and 105 SCHU b. Expand the OX-38 (CD4 T cell depleting antibody) and 55-6 (isotype control antibody for OX-38). After we have confirmed that the OX-38 antibody binds to CD4+ splenocytes, then we will send the hybridomas to Taconic for production of ascites fluid c. Measure the resistance of Fischer 344 rats against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge after transfer of 1 ml immune rat serum. d. Titrate the amount of F. tularensis-specific antibodies in immune sera from vaccinated mice, rats, and non-human primates. This will help us to determine the equivalent amount of sera from each species to transfer into naïve Fischer 344 rats to assess their ability to passively protect rats e. Compare the sensitivity of NCI and Harlan Fischer 344 rats to i.t. SCHU S4 challenge 10. Anticipated travel The UNM team will travel to Phoenix AZ for the UNM TVDC annual meeting in October 2008. No COA will be required. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 23 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 12/13-UNM Milestone description: Assays for detecting relevant immune responses in animals & humans developed and Compare assays in animal models (sensitivity) Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 7/15/06 (MS12) and 12/06 (MS13) 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. No new work done this month. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed Mouse proliferation assay, IFN and IL-2 Elispot, anti-Ft antibody titration Rat IFN Elispot, anti-Ft antibody titration Guinea pig anti-Ft antibody titration 7. Quality of performance NA 8. Percentage completed 60% 9. Work plan for upcoming month None 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 12/13 Milestone description: Assays for detecting relevant immune responses in animals & humans developed and compared to those in other species. Institution: LBERI 1. Date started: 2/23/2006 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Continued to screen non-LVS vaccinated NHPs in both the IFNγ ELISPOT and proliferation assays in order to avoid choosing any high responders to serve as LVS-naïve controls. ii. In the past month, 16 additional NHPs were screened, bringing the total number of NHPs screened to 35. iii. 24 additional NHPs will be screened in the next several weeks (4 – 8/week). b. Typical profiles of the response of NHPs to LVS and SCHU S4 antigens are shown in Figures 1 (IFNγ secretion) and 2 (proliferation) Page 24 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble i. ii. iii. iv. v. Figure 1A represents NHPs that secrete IFNγ primarily in response to high doses of formalin fixed antigens (6/16 NHPs showed this pattern). Figure 1B represents NHPs that secrete IFNγ in response to heat-killed antigens in addition to the formalin fixed ones (6/16 NHPs showed this pattern). Figure 1C represents NHPs that had a high background response making it difficult to discern a response to the LVS or SCHU S4 antigens; although none had RBC contamination higher than 1.6% (3/16 NHPs showed this pattern). Figure 2A represents NHPs that had little proliferative response to any of the LVS or SCHU S4 antigens (4/15 NHPs showed this response). Figure 2B represents NHPs that proliferated in response to more than one LVS or SCHU S4 antigen (11/15 NHPs showed this pattern). A IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 28438 28447 28617 Media LVS hk Hi LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi LVS ff Mid LVS ff Lo LVS hk Super SCHUS4 hk Super SCHUS4 hk Hi SCHUS4 hk Mid SCHUS4 ff Super SCHUS4 ff Hi SCHUS4 ff Mid Page 25 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble B IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) 300 250 200 150 SCHUS4 hk Super 100 SCHUS4 hk Hi SCHUS4 hk Mid 50 SCHUS4 ff Super 0 SCHUS4 ff Hi 28547 28569 28570 C 300 IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) Media LVS hk Hi LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi LVS ff Mid LVS ff Lo LVS hk Super 250 200 150 100 SCHUS4 ff Mid Media LVS hk Hi LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi LVS ff Mid LVS ff Lo LVS hk Super SCHUS4 hk Super SCHUS4 hk Hi SCHUS4 hk Mid 50 SCHUS4 ff Super SCHUS4 ff Hi 0 28395 28496 28559 SCHUS4 ff Mid Figure 1: Representative patterns of IFNγ production by non-LVS vaccinated NHPs. 6/16 NHPs secreted IFNγ primarily to formalin-fixed LVS or SCHU S4 antigens (A) whereas 6/16 NHPs secreted IFNγ to other antigens as well (B). 3/16 NHPs demonstrated high background responses making it difficult to discern whether they responded to the LVS and SCHU S4 antigens (C). (ff = formalin fixed; hk = heat-killed; Super = 4 x 105/ml, Hi = 1 x 105/ml; Mid = 025 x 105/ml; Lo = 0.0625 x 105/ml). All PBMCs were plated at 1.33 x 106/ml. Page 26 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Relative Luciferase Units (Mean +/- SEM) 45000 A 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Relative Luciferase Units (Mean +/- SEM) 28438 28549 80000 B 70000 Media LVS hk Hi LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi LVS ff Mid LVS ff Lo LVS hk Super SCHUS4 hk Super SCHUS4 hk Hi SCHUS4 hk Mid SCHUS4 ff Super SCHUS4 ff Hi SCHUS4 ff Mid Media LVS hk Hi LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi 60000 LVS ff Mid 50000 LVS ff Lo 40000 LVS hk Super SCHUS4 hk Super 30000 SCHUS4 hk Hi 20000 SCHUS4 hk Mid 10000 SCHUS4 ff Super 0 SCHUS4 ff Hi 28447 28547 28565 SCHUS4 ff Mid Figure 2: Representative patterns of LVS- and SCHU S4-stimulated proliferation by nonLVS vaccinated NHPs. 4/15 NHPs proliferated to few or none of the formalin-fixed LVS or SCHU S4 antigens (A) whereas 11/15 NHPs proliferated to more than one LVS and/or SCHU S4 antigen (B). (ff = formalin fixed; hk = heat-killed; Super = 4 x 105/ml, Hi = 1 x 105/ml; Mid = 025 x 105/ml; Lo = 0.0625 x 105/ml). All PBMCs were plated at 1 x 106/ml. Data Interpretation: Once again, it was observed that the highest response in the IFN ELISPOT assay is usually to LVS FF Hi. The response usually dilutes out when less stimulating antigen is used (LVS FF Mid or –Lo). A continuum of responses is observed in these non-LVS vaccinated NHPs. Data storage: Raw Data \\Saturn\Group\Wilder Lab\TVDC\PBMC assay statview\PBMC assay080308.svd; TVDC (3) bound notebook (9225), pp. 41 46; 48– 53; 58 – 63; 68 - 75 Page 27 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble vi. vii. Plasma from the 16 non-LVS vaccinated NHPs was tested for IgG antiLVS reactivity by ELISA (Figure 3A); and most had titers less than 100,000. The definition of titer, however, does not reflect the different properties of the plasma as shown in Figure 3B and Table 1 (titer = the inverse of the highest dilution producing: 1) an OD405 value > background and 2) an OD405 value that is equal to or higher than the next dilution (i.e. in a linear portion of the curve). 1000000 100000 10000 Cell Mean for OD405 1000 28395 28438 28447 28464 28496 28503 28511 28525 28547 28549 28559 28565 28569 28570 28617 28651 IgG anti-LVS Titer A 2 1.8 1.6 28464 B 28503 28547 28651 896 Post-boost 896 Pre-boost 1.4 1.2 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 800 4000 20000 100000 500000 Plasma Dilution Factor Page 28 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 3: IgG anti-LVS titers from 16 non-LVS vaccinated NHPs are shown in panel A (above). In Panel B, four non-LVS vaccinated NHPs (28464, 28503, 28547, 28651) are compared to A00896 (896), an LVS-vaccinated NHP, before (Pre-boost) and 12 days after (Post-boost) a bronchoscopic boost with 100,000 LVS. All have titers > 20,000 (shown in Table 1 below). Table 1: Titer determination of non-LVS and LVS-vaccinated NHPs displayed in Figure 3. 800 4000 20000 100000 500000 28464 0.194 0.099 0.075 0.071 0.071 0.066 28503 0.257 0.112 0.077 0.072 0.071 0.066 28547 0.242 0.105 0.074 0.068 0.07 0.066 28651 0.481 0.161 0.087 0.074 0.072 0.066 896 Pre-boost 0.433 0.139 0.078 0.073 0.07 0.074 896 Post-boost Posboostboost 1.769 0.531 0.179 0.088 0.072 0.074 NHP Blank Data Interpretation: Most (12) of the 16 non-LVS vaccinated NHPs have IgG anti-LVS titers lower than 100,000. However, similar titers do not always indicate that the plasma has the same properties (most obvious when comparing 896 post-boost with 28464). These data suggest that there may be a need to re-think how titer is defined to come up with a way that better expresses the entire dilution curve. Data storage: Raw Data \\Saturn\Group\Wilder Lab\TVDC\PBMC assay statview\PBMC assay080308.svd; TVDC (3) bound notebook (9225), p. 47; pp. 68 – 75. c. Continued to test the ability of the Cerus freeze/thaw protocol to spare the reactivity of IFN secreting cells in the ELISPOT assay. i. Two more aliquots of frozen non-LVS vaccinated NHPs were thawed and tested for their ability to secrete IFNγ in response to LVS (Figure 4). Page 29 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble LVS hk Hi 350 LVS hk Mid LVS ff Hi 300 LVS ff Mid 250 LVS ff Lo 200 LVS hk Super SCHUS4 hk Super 150 SCHUS4 hk Hi 100 SCHUS4 hk Mid 50 SCHUS4 ff Super A06589, Frozen A06589, Fresh SCHUS4 ff Hi A06587, Frozen 0 A06587, Fresh IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) Media 400 SCHUS4 ff Mid Figure 4: IFNγ production by fresh and frozen/thawed PBMCs from non-LVS vaccinated NHPs to LVS antigens is shown (ff = formalin fixed; hk = heat-killed; Super = 4 x 105/ml, Hi = 1 x 105/ml; Mid = 025 x 105/ml; Lo = 0.0625 x 105/ml). All PBMCs were plated at 1.33 x 106/ml. Data Interpretation: Once again, the results are inconsistent. The freeze/thaw process did not spare the responsiveness of the cells in A06587 to LVS ff Hi or SCHUS4 ff Super, although it is a bit difficult to interpret the data based on the fact the background response to media was elevated in the frozen vs. fresh cells. On the other hand, the response to the various antigens was spared a little more when considering A06589 although all the responses were quite low even when considering the fresh cells. As both of these responses are from non-LVS vaccinated NHPs, it is difficult to predict what proportion of a high response to LVS antigens would be spared. More work needs to be done with PBMCs from LVS-vaccinated NHPs. Data storage: Raw Data \\Saturn\Group\Wilder Lab\TVDC\PBMC assay statview\PBMC assay080308.svd; TVDC (2) bound notebook (8935), pps. 88 – 92; TVDC (3) bound notebook (9225), pps. 35 - 40. c. Update on A00896, a LVS vaccinated NHP that developed an aggressive behavior pattern i. Since this NHP was not going to be used on a study in the ABLS3, he was challenged with 100,000 CFU LVS by bronchoscopy. ii. On day 12 post LVS bronchoscopy, the NHP was euthanized and blood and splenocytes were collected. iii. Figure 5 compares the ability of PBMCs to secrete IFNγ before and after LVS boost by bronchoscopy. iv. Figure 6 shows the ability of splenocytes to secrete IFNγ after the LVS boost. v. Plasma IgG anti-LVS titer increased from 20,000 to 100,000 after the LVS boost. Page 30 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble There were not enough PBMCs to test the proliferative response to LVS and SCHU S4 antigens on the day of the LVS boost, but when comparing the PBMCs collected on day 12 post LVS bronchoscopy (day 595) to a previous time point (day 276), no increased response was noted. 400 350 * Day 583 Day 595 300 * * * x x 250 200 * x 150 x x 100 LVS hk Super LVS ff Lo LVS ff Mid LVS ff Hi LVS hk Mid 0 LVS hk Hi 50 Media IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) vi. Figure 5: The ability of PBMCs from an LVS-vaccinated NHP (A00896) to secrete IFNγ before (Day 583) or after (Day 595) bronchoscopy with 100,000 CFU LVS. All cells plated at 1.33 x 106/ml; * indicates significantly different from both media and the opposite day of bleed by ANOVA; x indicates significantly different from media. Page 31 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report 500 450 400 1 1.33 N T SCHUS4 ff Hi N T SCHUS4 ff Mid N T SCHUS4 ff Super N T SCHUS4 hk Mid N T SCHUS4 hk Hi LVS hk Super LVS ff Lo T N T N C T LVS ff Mid LVS ff Hi LVS hk Mid LVS hk Hi T N T C 100 50 0 SCHUS4 hk Super 350 300 250 200 150 Media IFNg Spots (Mean +/- SEM) Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 6: The ability of spleen cells from an LVS-vaccinated NHP (A00896) to secrete IFNγ before 12 days after bronchoscopy with 100,000 CFU LVS. All cells plated at either 1 or 1.33 x 106/ml; TNTC = too numerous to count; NT = not tested. Data Interpretation: Challenge of an LVS-vaccinated NHP with LVS by bronchoscopy increases the ability of the PBMCs to secrete IFNγ in response to LVS and SCHU S4 antigens. Data storage: Raw Data \\Saturn\Group\Wilder Lab\TVDC\PBMC assay statview\PBMC assay080308.svd; TVDC (3) bound notebook (9225), pps. 24 - 34. 4. Significant decisions made or pending There may be a need to re-assess how IgG anti-LVS titer is determined. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 77% of the scientific work is complete. 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Continue to test PBMCs from non-vaccinated NHPs in the IFN ELISPOT and proliferation assays to determine the effect of HK and FF LVS at different concentrations. b. Continue to freeze down extra cells if they are available. Page 32 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None anticipated Milestone 14 Milestone description: Assays in vaccinated humans validated (sensitivity) Institution: UNM/LBERI 1. Date started: 2/29/2008 2. Date completed: in progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. No new work done this month. 4. Significant decisions made or pending NA 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address NA 6. Deliverables completed NA 7. Quality of performance NA 8. Percentage completed 1.5% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Determine the viability of PBMC after a single freeze-thaw cycle. b. Stimulate PBMC with LVS or mitogen to determine whether antigen-specific proliferation and IFN production are retained after freeze-thaw c. Develop SOP for generating macrophages from fresh and frozen PBMC 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 17 Milestone description: In vitro assay for analysis of cellular and humoral elements of the immune response in vaccinated human and animal’s response to T. tularensis established Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 2/29/2008 2. Date completed: in progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. No new work done this month. 4. Significant decisions made or pending NA Page 33 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address NA 6. Deliverables completed NA 7. Quality of performance NA 8. Percentage completed 1.5% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Develop SOP for generating macrophages from fresh and frozen PBMC b. Develop SOP for infecting human monocyte-derived macrophages with LVS and SCHU S4 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 19-UNM Milestone description: Interaction between human alveolar macrophages and F. tularensis Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 12/15/06 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions No new work done this month because the collection was cancelled 4. Significant decisions made or pending NA 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address NA 6. Deliverables completed NA 7. Quality of performance Needs improvement 8. Percentage completed 13% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Repeat cytokine analysis of human alveolar macrophages cultured in nontissue culture treated tubes and on tissue culture treated plates. b. Determine the effect of recombinant IFN on intracellular growth of SCHU S4 and LVS. 10. Anticipated travel NA 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 34 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 21-UNM Milestone description: T cell-induced macrophage killing of intracellular bacteria Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 12/15/06 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Experiment PFT3(ABD Primate binder 1 & 2, electronic data D:\My Documents\NHP studies\PFT3 LVS 6-25-08\PFT3d12 ICC analysis ) i. This experiment utilized animal A00896, a cynomolgus macaque vaccinated by intradermal inoculation with 1.5x107 cfu LVS on 11/20/06 and boosted by bronchoscope instillation of 1x105 cfu LVS on 6/25/08. Lungs, tracheobronchial lymph nodes (TBLN) and spleen were collected on day 12 after boosting. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if cells from an LVS-treated NHP could be stimulated in vitro with HK-LVS to secrete TNF, IL-2, or IFN and if populations of cells secreting multiple cytokines simultaneously could be detected. Of particular interest were T-cells capable of secreting high levels of all three cytokines (multifunctional cells). An increased frequency of multifunctional cells has been established as a correlate of protection in other intracellular pathogen infection models and is being explored as a potential correlate of protection for tularemia vaccines. ii. TBLN cells were used for IFN ELISPOT.(See MS#27 for data) iii. Lung and spleen single cell suspensions were used in multifunctional assay to detect intracellular cytokine production. Cells were treated with media only, anti-CD28 only, anti-CD28+1x107 cfu/ml HK-LVS (LD), or anti-CD28+2x107 cfu/ml HK-LVS(HD) for a total of 6 hours (last 4 hours in the presence of Golgi Plug). a. Spleen assay: Cells were lost at some point in the assay resulting in insufficient event acquisition. b. Lung assay: i. There was a very low frequency of CD4+ multifunctional cells (CD4+ cells simultaneously secreting TNF, IL-2, and IFN) in the media only and anti-CD28 treated cells but both doses of HK-LVS stimulated high levels of multifunctional cells. (Figure 4) ii. There was a spontaneous population of CD4+ IFN single positive cells that was further expanded by specific antigen stimulation. Overall, the functional profile was similar between the two doses of HK-LVS. (Figure 5) iii. CD8+ cells lung cells showed only modest production of IFN with no increase upon stimulation (data not shown). Page 35 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 4.Two doses of HK-LVS stimulated high frequency of lung CD4+ multifunctional cells. Lung tissue was collected from animal A00896, processed to single cell suspension, and then stimulated as indicated followed by staining with α-CD4 and irrelevant antibody controls (CD4/Irr Ab) or cytokine-specific antibodies. Figure 5. Functional cytokine production profile of CD4+ lung cells from animal A00896 treated in vitro with media alone (black bars), α-CD28 (blue bars), α-CD28+LD HK-LVS (green bars) and α-CD28+HD HK-LVS (red bars). The profiles were similar following stimulation with each dose of HK-LVS. b. Experiment PFT4 (ABD Primate Binders 1&2, electronic: D:\My Documents\NHP studies\PFT4 Naive 7-18-08) i. In this experiment, TBLN, lung and spleen cells were collected from 2 untreated (naïve) NHP on 7/18/08. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the specificity of the NHP multifunctional assay by testing if cells from untreated NHPs could be stimulated in vitro with HK-LVS to secrete TNF, IL-2, or IFN. In addition, the ability of frozen lung cells from an LVS-treated NHP to respond to specific antigen stimulation was Page 36 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble ii. also tested. TBLN cells were frozen, to be used in future IFN ELISPOT assays. Fresh lung and spleen cells from naive NHPs as well as frozen lung and spleen cells from LVS treated NHP (PFT3d12) were used in intracellular cytokine multifunctional T cell assay performed as above. a. Spleen assay: cell numbers and events collected were as expected but very little cytokine production was detected. There were no differences between splenocytes from naive and LVStreated NHPs or between media only and HK-LVS stimulated splenocytes (data not shown). b. Lung assay: i. Results from tissues from two naive NHP were similar (only one shown as an example) ii. Naïve CD4+ lung cells were not stimulated to secrete cytokines by treatment with HK-LVS. (Figure 6) iii. Naïve CD8+ lung cells did not produce TNF, IL-2, or IFN when stimulated with HK-LVS. (data not shown) iv. Frozen lung cells from LVS treated NHP could be stimulated with HK-LVS but showed higher levels of CD4+ multifunctional cells as compared to when fresh lung cells were stimulated (Figure 6) v. The cytokine production profile of cell populations was similar between fresh and frozen LVS vaccinated lung cells. There was a decrease in IFN single positive cells and an increase in triple positive cells. (Figure 7) Figure 6. The percentage of lung CD4+ multifunctional cells was below background in untreated NHP (black bars) but similar between fresh (blue bars) and frozen cells (red bars) from an LVS vaccinated/LVS boosted NHP (A00896) following stimulation with αCD28+HK-LVS. Page 37 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 7. The functional profile of the CD4+ lung cell response was similar between fresh (blue bars) and frozen (red bars) cells from LVS vaccinated/LVS treated NHP following stimulation with α-CD28+HK-LVS. c. Experiment Ftc30.20b (Notebook 109, pages 137-139) i. The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether splenocytes from LVS vaccinated mice can suppress SCHU S4 growth in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). ii. BMM were infected with SCHU S4 at MOI of 1:100 (bacteria:macrophages) and then incubated with 105 or 106 splenocytes from unvaccinated or LVS vaccinated mice for 2 days iii. In this experiment, addition of 106 naïve splenocytes reduced the SCHU S4 burden more than in previous experiments that measured killing of LVS in infected macrophages(Fig 8). This was a surprise because SCHU S4 is more virulent than LVS and may reflect a difference between SCHU S4 and LVS infected macrophages, but this experiment has to be repeated iv. Nevertheless, these results showed that addition of 105 vaccinated splenocytes caused a modest but significant reduction in SCHU S4 burden compared with 105 naïve splenocytes. Addition of 106 vaccinated splenocytes caused a more significant reduction in SCHU S4 burden, but the difference between addition of naïve and vaccinated splenocytes is at most 1 log in cfu/ml recovered. This is a relatively small effect. Page 38 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure. 8. Vaccinated splenocytes induced murine BMM killing of SCHU S4. Murine BMM were infected with SCHU S4 at MOI of 1:100 (bacteria:macrophages) and incubated with 105 or 106 splenocytes from naïve or LVS-vaccinated splenocytes. After 48 h, the bacterial burden was determined. d. Experiment Ftc61.7 (Notebook 109, pages 163-165) and Experiment Ftc61.7b (Notebook 109, pages 170-172) i. The purpose of these experiments was to determine whether T cells from LVS vaccinated rats can suppress SCHU S4 growth in rat bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). ii. Rat BMM were infected with SCHU S4 at MOI of 1:100 (bacteria:macrophages) and then incubated with 105 or 106 splenocytes from unvaccinated and LVS-vaccinated rats for 3 days iii. As shown in Fig 9, addition of 105 vaccinated splenocytes did not significantly reduce the SCHU S4 burden compared with addition of 105 naïve splenocytes. However, when 106 splenocytes were added, there was a 10-fold difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated splenocytes. Although the effect on SCHU S4 growth in BMM was not as dramatic as on LVS growth in BMM (prior experiments), the fact that 50 ng/ml recombinant rat IFN further reduced the number of SCHU S4 recovered suggest that the assay can be improved to increase the difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated splenocytes. Page 39 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure. 9. LVS Vaccinated rat splenocytes reduced the number of SCHU S4 recovered from infected rat BMM. Rat BMM were infected with SCHU S4 at MOI of 1:100 (bacteria:macrophages) and then incubated with naïve or vaccinated splenocytes or recombinant IFNas indicated After 72 hrs, the bacterial burden was determined. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address In the multifunctional assay, stimulation with HK-LVS did not induce production of any of the three cytokines examined by CD8+ lung T-cells or either population of splenic T-cells. In subsequent experiments, ConA, a positive control mitogen, will be included to confirm that assay conditions allow for production in response to stimulation and detection of the cytokines of interest. 6. Deliverables completed NA 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 35% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Tissues from two NHPs infected with 1x105 cfu of LVS will be harvested on day 28 and day 42 post-exposure. Cells from these animals will be used to further develop the multifunctional assay and to assess antigen-specific cytokine responses at these time points. b. Repeat the murine macrophage SCHU S4 killing assay with naïve and vaccinated splenocytes. c. Optimize the rat macrophage SCHU S4 killing assay with naïve and vaccinated splenocytes, focusing on increasing the difference between naïve and vaccinated splenocytes. We will first titrate the MOI for infecting rat macrophages with SCHU S4 Page 40 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 21 Milestone description: Correlates of protection: in vitro assay or other readout of effector function of Ft developed for multiple species. . Institution: LBERI 1. Date started: 4/8/2008 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. No work was done on this Milestone this month. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None. 6. Deliverables completed None. 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 2% of the scientific work is complete 9. Work plan for upcoming month Set up another intracellular cytokine assay and include a positive control. 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None anticipated. Milestone 26 Milestone description: Confirmation of gene and protein expression (develop HTP SOPs for ORF library production, protein library production, and protein purification) Description: Prepare a high-throughput protein production system Select and test ORF expression constructs Select and test IVT Protocols Select and test protocols for protein purification Institution: ASU-Sykes 1. Date started: 3/02/2006 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions: Page 41 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble A. Thioredoxin LEE Construct Design 1. Thioredoxin (Trx) tag facilitates proper protein folding 2. Trx tag will be well exposed due to its large size (11Kda) and folding property 3. Protein purification is done using magnetic beads which are covalently linked anti-Trx antibody 4. Double tag: Thioredoxin Tag at the N-Terminus for yield and purification advantages. His Tag at the C-Terminus for full-length visualization of samples and as an alternative detection method if desired. 5. Two-step assembly protocol. Fig. 1: Schematic of two-step assembly reaction for expression constructs. B. Testing protocols for protein purification using anti-Thioredoxin (Trx) antibodies 1. Test specificity and efficiency of anti-thioredoxin monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies from different vendors Page 42 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble a. Four anti-Thioredoxin monoclonal Abs (mAb2A1, 3A1, 8A1, A00180) from two t manufacturers (Abcam and Genescript) were compared to a polyclonal Ab (pAb Trx) by immunoblot analysis. b. In each gel lane 1: Kaleidoscope ladder, lane 2: E.coli IVT lysate without template, lane 3: purified recombinant Trx, and lane 4: chemluminescent ladder. c. Gels are probed with Abcam monoclonal trx, Genescript polyclonal and monoclonal Trx, or Genetech anti-His antibodies as indicated. (data in figure 2) Figure 2: Comparison of performance of different anti-Trx antibodies by immunoblot analysis. R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU gels\FTU IVT Western\Thio mAb and pAb test 02 on Ecoli and Trx 6-25-08 2. These results indicate that the polyclonal (pAbaTrx) and only 1 monoclonal (mAb A00180) reacts specifically and efficiently with the thioredoxin. The arrow indicates position of Trx C. Set up for testing IVT products from new Trx LEE constructs in T cell assays 1. An anti-trx or anti-his antibody was non-covalently attached to protein G-magnetic beads via the antibody’s Fc receptor stem. 2. Ni-magnetic beads were used as comparison 3. Trx/His two-tagged polypeptides produced in IVT reactions were incubated with beads Page 43 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble G-α-Thio and washed. 4. Beads were used to stimulate murine splenocytes. 5. IFN-gamma release was measured in an ELISpot assay (data in Figure 3) Ni G-α-His No Template No Template Ova FTU901 FTU1695 50% Naïve+ 50% DO11.10 Ova FTU901 FTU1695 LVS Vaccinated R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU Scintillation results\FTI IVT Thio Fusion tests Figure 3: ELISPOT analysis of Trx-tagged IVT products purified on anti-thio, antihis, or nickel attached magnetic beads. UNM Ftc59 study 20 (Notebook 115, pages 128-132 and 138) L:\Lyonslab\Tularemia\Tularemia Contract Folder\Experiments and Results\Ftc59\Ftc59 study 20 UNM Ftc59 study 21 (Notebook 115, 134 and 139)L:\Lyonslab\Tularemia\Tularemia Contract Folder\Experiments and Results\Ftc59\Ftc59 study 21 D. Analysis of ELISpot results 1. Left hand panel: Background is only a problem against the LVS-immune splenocytes, as the cross-reactivity is not seen in these ova-immune cells 2. Right hand panel: We observe significant differences among bead configurations in the LVS-immune cells. We are testing the anti-trx G bead, Ni bead or anti-His G bead bound samples in each row to assess level of cross-reactivity remaining in samples after affinity purification of polypeptides in these 3 different bead-based antigen stimulation protocols 3. Bottom row of LVS panel shows Ni bead samples. As seen previously, there is a high level of cross-stimulation of LVS-immune T cells with FTU or OVA antigen samples. 4. Middle row of LVS panel: The anti-His G beads displays less background, and presumably better purification. 5. Top row, LVS panel: the anti-Trx G beads provide the lowest background, and presumably the highest level of purification. E. Evaluation of scale-up protocol for thioredoxin fusion FTU polypeptides. 1. We tested the performance of the template design in IVT reactions with a number of different ORF sequences carried out in HTP formats (Fig. 4). Page 44 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Fig. 4. High-throughput cell-free protein synthesis of FTU polypeptides in E.coli based system Data locations: R:\GeneVac\BAN\BAN IVT Data\BAN IVT Gel\BAN IVT 35S gels\BAN IVT Plate 04 Row A and B Thio Purification Test Supernatant 7-10-08 02 R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU gels\ FTU HTP IVT 35S gels\FTU RbG pl 1 Q1 Denaturing purification FT E 3-25-08 01 2. FTU ORFs were constructed into either the original His LEE or the new two-tag LEE (Trx and His tags). 35S-methionine IVT reactions were performed with identical conditions and analyzed on gels. 3. The autoradiograph results shown in Fig. 3 demonstrate that the new template two-tag design (panel 2) both generates higher yields and more robust reaction success than the His-tag only templates (panel 1). E. Evaluation of longer LEE constructs. 1. We had selected the shorter LEE design based on the performance of the His Page 45 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble polypeptide products. Since we now can use the Trx /His fusions, we tested the possibility of generating longer polypeptides. This would mean fewer samples to evaluate in T cell assays. 2. We successfully built the longer LEE templates carrying ORFs of ~1000bp, in a HTP protocol format, as compared to the current constructs carrying 500 to 600bp ORFs. This is shown in Fig. 5A-C below. Fig. 5A. LEEs are robustly assembled from a short ORF design, without Trx. Data location: R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU gels\FTU HTP IVT DNA gels\Other\FTU short plate #1 amp2 7-23-07_02 Page 46 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Fig. 5B. LEEs are robustly assembled from a short ORF design, with Trx. Data location R:\GeneVac\BAN\BAN IVT Data\BAN Thio LEE Amp Gel\BAN IVT Plate 01 Amp 79-08 02__ Fig. 5C. LEEs are robustly assembled from a long ORF design, with Trx Data location: R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU gels\FTU HTP IVT DNA gels\Thio LEE Construct\Long Plate 1 Columns 1 and 2 LEE test 7-25-08 Page 47 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 3. Conclusion from Fig. 5 results: Trx-His two-tagged LEE constructs were assembled as efficiently as single-tagged His LEEs. 4. We used these long constructs in IVT reactions to evaluate efficiency and integrity of longer polypeptides syntheses. Fig. 6. Radiolabeled IVT reactions using FTU long LEE constructs were analyzed by autoradiography. Data location: R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU gels\FTU HTP IVT 35S gels\Thio fusion IVT\Thio Long ORF Thio Test 7-30-08 crop 5. These polypeptide yields were calculated as usual and are presented in Table 1 below. 6. We note that the LEE constructs expressing the longer ORFs, shown in red box, yielded similar quantities of IVT product as compared to the shorter LEE constructs. Page 48 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Table 1. Calculated yields of LEEs carrying a range of ORF sizes. Data location: R:\GeneVac\FTU\Contract\Proteome\FTU IVT Data\FTU Scintillation results\FTI IVT Thio Fusion tests\FTU Long ORF IVT Test 7-27-08 7. We conclude that longer ORFs can be robustly generated with the context of our new template two tag (Trx/His) design. F. Evaluation of the capacities of anti-Trx beads to capture nascent polypeptides 1. In the pilot studies described above, the Trx antibodies were non-covalently attached to beads via the Fc stem. To make our purification reagents more stable and consistent, and to improve binding capacity, we covalently conjugated the antibodies to the beads, as previously proposed. We now evaluated the ability of the antibody affinity beads to bind and elute the Trx-fusion proteins. 2. Several IVT reactions were carried out with no template, OVA, and 2 different FTU ORF expressing templates in the presence of the antibody attached beads. Beads were washed, and then total bead bound proteins were pH eluted. 3. Samples were electrophoresed and visualized by silver stain (total protein) and 35S detection (de novo polypeptide) in Fig. 7. 4. The results indicate that all 3 antibody samples bind the Trx fusion polypeptides. Page 49 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 5. However, the mix of Abcam monoclonal antibodies binds with lower efficiency than either Genescript antibody. 6. Since the polyclonal antibody is a less well-defined reagent, and carries more irrelevant proteins (as visualized in silver stain) we chose to proceed with the monoclonal antibody from Genescript. Fig. 7. Visualizing efficiency of anti-Trx antibody capture of the Trx-fusion products from IVT lysates G. Determination of whether bead purified IVT reactions cross-stimulate in NHP ELISpot assay. 1. IVT lysates without template were incubated with or without anti-Trx antibody bound beads. These samples were shipped to UNM and evaluated in ELISpot assays for stimulation of NHP lymph node cells. These results are displayed din Fig. 8. Page 50 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble a. Fig. 8. ELISpot analysis of cross-reactivity caused by total IVT lysate proteins versus IVT lysate proteins after bead purification. Data location: UNM data located at Ftc59 study 22 (Notebook 115, pages 148-151, 154, 155) 2. Duplicate wells shown in Fig. 7 show that IVT as is (unpurified), shown in a11,a12 and b11,b12, cross-stimulated NHP cells, as seen with murine cells. 3. However, the bead samples shown in b1 and 2, c1 and 2, d1 and 2, and e1 and 2 indicate that the cross-reacting material does not bind to the beads. Page 51 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 4. The formalin fixed LVS antigen added to NHP cells in row g, serves as a stimulation level reference for this experiment. The LVS antigen was titrated from neat to a 1:1000 dilution. H. Second NHP ELISPOT assay. 1. In this experiment, a second monkey was used as source of lymph node cells. We repeated the E. coli lysate as is samples and also included the NEB reconstructed IVT samples to evaluate cross-reactivity of its components against NHP cells (Fig. 9). Ova antigen generated in E. coli lysate, and bound to antitrx beads. Amount of Ab on beads titrated at 10ul, 20ul, 50ul, in duplicate Blank Titration of NEB IVT mix “as is”, at 5ul thru’ 0.005ul in duplicate Titration of E. coli lysate “as is”, at 5ul thru’ 0.005ul in duplicate FF-LVS titration: Figure 9: ELISpot analysis of cross-reactivity caused by total IVT lysate proteins versus NEB pure components. Data location: UNM data located at Ftc59 study 23 (Notebook 115, pages 156-160) Page 52 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 2. The reactivity level in this experiment is about half as judged from the LVS standards shown in row g. 3. A titration of antibody for bead purification indicates that increasing the amount of material from 10ul to 50ul does not raise the cross-reactivity level. This is good because we have previously shown that more antibody on the beads leads to higher polypeptide yields. 4. The NEB IVT mix does not lead to cross-stimulation of these cells as compared to the full E. coli lysates. This is in contrast to our result with the murine splenocytes. We will repeat this to confirm difference between the monkey and murine cell responses. If repeated, this indicates that we can use the reconstructed IVT mix without need for polypeptide purification. 4. Significant decisions made or pending We anticipate closing out MS26 this month. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None at this time 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Excellent 8. Percentage completed 100% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. Retest cross-reactivity stimulated by NHP cells with NEB reconstructed expression mix as compared to full IVT lysate. b. Test covalently attached anti-trx antibody beads with NHP cells. c. Test yields generated from stored vs. fresh E. coli lysates. d. Test sensitivity of frozen NHP cells as compared to fresh samples. 10. Anticipated travel -Will be attending the CHI Novel Vaccines Conference next week in Boston entitled: Bridging, Research, Development, and Production. -Will report back anything relevant to the TVDC program. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 27-UNM Milestone description: Optimization of T cell assays and endpoints in mice. UNM will use ASU’s protein fragments in lymph node proliferation assays to define vaccine candidates Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 12/15/06 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions Page 53 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble b. Ftc59 study 22 (Notebook 115, pages 148-151, 154, 155) i. The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the nonspecific reactivity to ivt proteins by LVS vaccinated BALB/c splenocytes is also observed with lymph node cells from LVS vaccinated non-human primates ii. In this experiment, the NHP was vaccinated i.d. with 10 7 LVS on 11/20/06 and then boosted by bronchospcopy with 105 LVS on 6/25/08. The cells from the TBLN was collected on 7/7/08 iii. ASU provided in vitro transcription/translation (ivt) reactions with DNA templates encoding OVA, Ftu1695 and Ftu1712 or without DNA template as control. The ivt reactions were purified with monoclonal or polyclonal anti-thio antibody conjugated to magnetic beads and sent to UNM as bead-bound proteins in PBS iv. At UNM, the PBS was replaced with complete RPMI and tested by IFN ELISpot assay in the presence of 1.5 x 105 LN cells from the LVS vaccinated and boosted NHP. 90% of each sample was divided undiluted between two wells and the remaining 10% was diluted 1:10 before being divided between two wells. v. We used heat killed (wells F1-8) and formalin fixed (wells G1-8) LVS as positive controls, starting with 4 l of the original preparation “neat” and serially diluting 10-fold vi. For comparison, we used Invitrogen’s in vitro transcription/translation reaction mix without any purification (wells A11-12 and B11-12) vii. The plate layout and the actual results are shown below viii. Data interpretation will be presented in ASU section ivt proteins bound on G beads via antithio antibody 1 Monoclonal B Monoclonal C Polyclonal D Polyclonal E 2 blank No template neat No template 1:10 No template neat No template 1:10 Control F HK LVS neat A Control G H FF LVS neat 1700 ng/ml anti-CD3 3 blank 4 blank blank 9 10 No templ 11 12 "as is" neat OVA neat Ftu1695 neat Ftu1712 neat 1:10 "as is" 1:10 OVA 1:10 Ftu1695 1:10 Ftu1712 1:10 OVA OVA OVA neat Ftu1695 neat Ftu1712 neat 1:10 1:10 OVA 1:10 Ftu1695 1:10 HK LVS 1:100 FF LVS 1:100 17 ng/ml antiCD3 Ftu1712 1:10 Ftu901 Ftu901 HK LVS 1:1000 1:10 1:10 FF LVS 1:1000 Ftu1695 Ftu1695 blank 1:10 1:10 HK LVS 1:10 FF LVS 1:10 170 ng/ml anti CD3 5 6 7 8 Page 54 of 82 ivt proteins bound on G beads via antihis antibody Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble c. Ftc59 study 23 (Notebook 115, pages 156-160) i. The purpose of this experiment was to: 1. Repeat experiment Ftc59 study 22 2. Test different anti-thio antibodies for purification: 3. Compare the Invitrogen ivt reaction mix which has been used up to now with New England Biolab pure ivt reaction mix which has been depleted of all proteins not essential for in vitro transcription/translation ii. In this experiment, 105 LVS was delivered by bronchospcopy on 6/25/08 to an NHP and the cells from the TBLN were7/23/08. This differs from Experiment Ftc59 study 22 in that the NHP was not vaccinated previously. So the NHP for this experiment had been vaccinated only but had not been vaccinated and boosted. iii. ASU provided in vitro transcription/translation (ivt) reactions with DNA templates encoding OVA, Ftu1695 and Ftu1712 or without DNA template as control. The ivt reactions were purified with one of the following and sent to UNM in PBS: 1. A cocktail of monoclonal anti-thio antibodies from Abcam (wells A1-8 and B1-8) 2. A monoclonal anti-thio antibody from Genescreen (wells C18, D1-8, and A-F9 and A-F10) Page 55 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble iv. v. vi. vii. viii. 3. A polyclonal anti-thio antibody from Genescreen (wells E1-8 and F1-8) At UNM, the PBS was replaced with complete RPMI and tested by IFN ELISpot assay in the presence of 1.5 x 105 LN cells. 90% of each sample was divided undiluted between two wells and the remaining 10% was diluted 1:10 before being divided between two wells. ASU also provided ivt mixes from Invitrogen (wells B-D11 and BD12) and New England Biolab (wells E-G11 and E-G12) without any purification. UNM tested 0.05l, 0.5l and 5l per well We used heat killed (wells H1-8) and formalin fixed (wells G1-8) LVS as positive controls, starting with 4 l of the original preparation “neat” and serially diluting 10-fold The plate layout and the actual results are shown below Data interpretation will be presented in ASU section 1 2 No templ mAb Abcam 3 4 OVA mAb Abcam 5 6 Ftu1695 mAb Abcam 7 8 Ftu1712 mAb Abcam 9 10 OVA mAb genescript 10 ul 1:10 No Templ mAb Genescript 1:10 OVA mAb Genescript 1:10 Ftu1695 mAb Genescript 1:10 Ftu1712 mAb Genescript 1:10 OVA mAb genescript 20 ul E 1:10 No Templ pAb Genescript 1:10 OVA pAb Genescript 1:10 Ftu1695 pAb Genescript 1:10 Ftu1712 pAb Genescript 1:10 OVA mAb Genescript 50 ul F 1:10 1:10 1:10 1:10 G H FF LVS neat HK LVS neat FF LVS 1:10 HK LVS 1:10 FF LVS 1:100 HK LVS 1:100 FF LVS 1:1000 HK LVS 1:1000 1:10 Ftu901 mAb Genescript 1:10 A B C D 11 12 Blank 5 ul NEB IVT no templ 0.5 ul NEB IVT no templ 0.05 ul NEB IVT no templ 5 ul E coli IVT no templ 0.5 ul E coli IVT no templ 0.05 ul E coli IVT no templ Blank Page 56 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed NA 7. Quality of performance Fair 8. Percentage completed 30% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. b. Determine whether ivt translated B anthracis proteins induce IFN production by NHP lymph nodes cells. In Ftc59 study 22 and 23, we noticed that the ivt OVA protein seemed to stimulate more spots than the ivt Ftu proteins. This raised the question whether it is appropriate to use ivt OVA to measure the amount of background spots. Perhaps NHPs have higher natural responses to OVA than Ftu proteins Determine whether NEB pure ivt reaction mix induce IFN production by NHP lymph node cells In Ftc59 study 23, we noticed that NEB pure had very few spots compared with Invitrogen’s ivt mix. It is possible that the NEB pure mix may be depleted of the crossreactive material 10. Anticipated travel NA Page 57 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors NA Milestone 28 Milestone description: Generation of polypeptide libraries (Optimize IVT proteinfragment production, Develop IVT protocol for high-throughput production, Validate immunogenicity of protein-fragments, Full scale production of protein-fragment library, Purification of protein-fragment library, Array protein-fragment into overlapping pools, Ship to UNM) Milestone description: Build SCHU4 proteome Build ORF expression library corresponding to proteome (inactive) Generate complete protein-fragment library (inactive) Array protein-fragments into measurable pools for T cell stimulation (inactive) Institution: ASU-Sykes 3. Date started: 03-01-2007 4. Date completed: Pending 5. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions A. Build ORF expression library corresponding to proteome B. Generate polypeptide library C. Array polypeptide library 4. Significant decisions made or pending. The decision to proceed into MS28 with implementation of proteome production plan is anticipated this month 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Very Good 8. Percentage completed 40% 9. Work plan for upcoming month Initiate library production. 10. Anticipated travel See above 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 58 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 35 - UNM Milestone description: Array hybridization with mouse RNA from virulent SCHU S4 infection and RT PCR confirmation of candidates Institution: UNM 1. Date started: 2. Date completed: pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions a. Ftc59 study 22 (Notebook 104, pages 157-158) i. The purpose of this experiment was isolate RNA from SCHU S4 cultured in Chamberlain’s broth and SCHU S4 from infected mouse lungs ii. RNA has been isolated under both conditions and is currently being tested for sterility. We will analyze the RNA quality and quantity before sending them to ASU 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 10% 9. Work plan for upcoming month a. We will prepare 200 g of SCHU S4 genomic DNA per request from ASU 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 35 Milestone description: Array hybridizations with mouse RNAs from virulent Schu 4 infection & RT PCR confirmation of candidates. Institution: UNM/ASU-Johnston 1. Date started: 08-01-2006 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions We have repeated a LAPT amplification of the first time course samples currently at ASU. These samples have been amplified and are in the process of being labeled for hybridization to the microarrays. Page 59 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble We had previously reported on optimization of qPCR for one gene (FTT0901 (Tul4)). We report here that we have extended the validation of our first primer sets for 6 genes (Table 1). FTT0901, FTT0721, and FTT1712c were determined of interest based on literature analysis of potential antigens or virulence factor genes. FTT0548, FTT0058, and FTT0256c were identified by microarray analyses of the first time course experiment based upon changes in expression over time with a pattern of increasing (FTT0548), decreasing (FTT0058), or steady (FTT0256c) expression levels. Table 1. Targeted gene list for initial qPCR validation studies. Following the study design for the initial validation for FTT0901, genomic SCHU S4 DNA was serially log-fold diluted from 10 ng/l to 0.001 ng/l. The reactions were run with the remaining 5 primer sets with the following specifications. Melting curve analysis was performed to ensure the uniformity of amplifications and to identify primer-dimer formation and cycling protocol was 95 ◦C for 2.00 minutes, 40.0 ◦C for 30 seconds and a 20 minute ramp to 95 ◦C. The quantification protocol included an initial incubation at 95 ◦C for 5 minutes followed by 40 cycles of 95 ◦C for 20 seconds and 60 ◦C for 1 minute. Two representative profiles of the 6 genes tested are shown in Figure 1. The melting curve analysis revealed a single peak for each of the genes. Across the dose response, there was less that 1.0 degree difference in the peak melting temperature indicating that amplifications were uniform. The quantitation plots of the genomic standards revealed a high R2 value of greater than 99. Similar results were obtained with the other 4 genes listed in Table 1. Page 60 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 1. Graphical representation of the qPCR reactions for FTT0721 and FTT0058. The curves at the top of the graph represent melting curve analyses. The lower plots reveal the regression analysis of the standards. We next sought to test the primers against a reconstitution sample of SCHU S4 RNA diluted into an excess of normal mouse lung RNA. SCHU S4 RNA was diluted into normal mouse lung RNA at log 10 dilutions from 1000 ng/µl to 0.001 ng/µl. After an initial reverse transcriptase reaction, the cDNAs were quantified for the primer sets via qPCR using a genomic DNA standard curve. Representative results for the six primers sets are shown in Figure 3 using FTT0721 primers. In the melting curve analysis there was a shift in the peak melting temperature when comparing the genomic standards (dark blue lines) to the reconstitution samples (light blue lines). In addition, the melting curves show negative pull down peaks at the higher temperatures. The differences between the melting curves between the samples may indicate secondary products being amplified and samples will need to be verified by gel electrophoresis to ensure single products. The negative pull down peaks at the high temperatures may be the result of using optically clear plates. We are evaluating different plate formats to determine if these peaks are artifacts. We were able to obtain reliable standard curves and were able to identify Cycle Threshold (Ct) values for each of the unknown samples. These results are representative of the Page 61 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble remaining primer sets with the exception of FTT0256c. We observed technical problems with the data from this latter primer set and it was not included in the final analysis. Figure 3. qPCR analysis for gene FTT0721. This graph is representative for the other six genes. The cycle time to cross the threshold was plotted for each of the genomic standards and a linear regression line used to calculate the Ct values for each of the reconstitution cDNA samples. We utilized the data from these analyses to create a Ct determination for each of the cDNA samples. The results, shown in Table 2, reveal that for 4 of the 6 genes assessed we were able to detect down to 0.01 ng/µl. For samples within the linear portion of the standard curve, there was an approximate 10 fold increase in the amount of SYBR Green dye that mirrored the increase in cDNA amounts. Importantly for each of the 5 genes shown, normal mouse lung cDNA did not reveal a Ct value after amplification. This reveals that the primer designs do not amplify a non-specific product. Page 62 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Table 2. Ct value calculations of reconstitution cDNA using 5 primer sets and genomic DNA as a standard curve. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address We encountered a problem with purification of SCHU S4 genomic DNA used for microarray normalization and qPCR standard curves. The UNM samples were alcohol precipitated to concentrate the DNA at ASU, but the SCHU S4 genomic DNAs would not re-dissolve after alcohol precipitation. This indicates that the SCHU S4 genomic DNA should be purified a second time to remove protein or carbohydrate contaminants. New DNA is being prepared by UNM using a different isolation method The negative pull-down peaks noticed on the melting curves may indicate an instrument problem or plate format problem. We performed duplicate analyses on a separate Eppendorf cycler and did not observe the pull-down peaks. This duplicate assay was run using a white opaque plate for qPCR analysis instead of the optically clear plates we have been normally using. We have ordered the white plates to further investigate this as a resolution to the problem. In addition, we had a service call by Eppendorf to evaluate our cycler function and it was found to be in good working order. Page 63 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble The shift in primer melting temperatures between the genomic and cDNA samples needs to be further evaluated. We will be performing duplicate assays to assess the presence of multiple products by gel electrophoresis. 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 40% 9. Work plan for upcoming month The repeat experiment of the time-course challenge of 1000, FTU SCHU S4 in mice will be performed and the RNA extracts processed through by LAPT. Process the repeat time course samples. Design and validate primers for genes for normalizing the qPCR reactions (16S Ribosomal genes) Assess gene expression levels of 6 current validated primer sets in the current RNA from the initial dose response and time course experimental sample set. 10. Anticipated travel None 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 49 Milestone description: Construct single mutants in F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) (iglC, pdpD, iglD, iglA, iglB) 49.1: Construct iglC F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) 49.2: Construct pdpD F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4), Construct iglD F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) 49.3: Construct iglA F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4), Construct iglB F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) Institution: UTSA 1. Date started: April 1, 2006 2. Date completed: in progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions In order to generate mutants in SCHU S4 we need to develop tools to generate successful deletions. Therefore, our focus is twofold, one is cloning experiments to get our target deletions into vectors that we can use in creating these deletions and experiments with SCHU S4 itself using constructs that we believe will allow us to make deletions into SCHU S4. I. Cloning: We were unable to continue with the cloning of the pdpD deletion containing the flip recombinase recognition sites (Flp) from the pwsK30 plasmid into pUC118 vector due to work being done the BSL3 lab to generate the vgrG SchuS4 mutant. We expect that we will have time in the upcoming month to work on this cloning. II. Experiments to generate mutants in Schu4: Page 64 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble a. Performed PCR on various colony pools taken from some of the original clones generated from the newest cryotransformation with the KEK1162 tulatron VgrG plasmid construct. These represented 5 colonies per pool and we were able to screen 33 pools (165 original clones). We used the oligo set FTT1346 fwd NdeI and VgrG rev EcoRI, which for the correct mutant will yield a PCR product 1600 bp where the wild type product would be 900 bp. Of all these pools we were only able to see mixed population of VgrG mutant size and wild type size. None of these sets showed a very strong mutant band in the PCR profile. We were hoping to find a possible original clone that might have both VgrG genes simultaneously interrupted without further passaging (data not shown, located in UTSA TVD Notebook 7, page 20, 22). We took two of these original sets VP22 and VP23 and prepared genomic isolations and ran PCRs using the aforementioned oligo set, in addition, we ran the EBS Universal with the VgrG rev EcoRI oligos together. This was able to verify whether these sets had the VgrG mutant complete and also that we do have a “VgrG intron” in the correct location (in a VgrG gene, Figure 1). Figure 1 Figure 1 represents PCR profiles resulting from using genomic templates generated from original VgrG clones and oligo sets FTT1346 fwd NdeI and VgrG rev EcoRI in panel B, and oligo set EBS Universal with VgrG rev EcoRI in panel A. Although the picture does not depict it well most of these clones did show a mutant size PCR 1600 bp fragment and a wild type 900 bp PCR fragment, lanes 4 thru 13. The strongest mutant band was shown in lane 13, C23-5 original clone. In addition, in panel B we expect the EBS universal oligo set to yield 800 bp PCR product using the original V17 clone, lane 3 as the positive control. All of the potential mutants screened here (lanes 4-13) did have the insertion in the correct location. Data located in UTSA TVD Notebook 7, page 25. b. We also screened by PCR various single colonies generated from a passage of V17 original clone; these represent first single clones from the original parent. These were screened by pools of 5 colonies each and we used the original aforementioned oligos. We were able to screen V17A thru V17AA pool sets which represent a total of 35 individual V17 passaged clones. None of these pools yielded a PCR profile that showed only the mutant product; however, pools M, O, S, T, U and V illustrated a stronger mutant band profile than seen in other Page 65 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble PCR groups. Therefore, first we took one of these groups (V17M) and prepared genomic isolations and ran these as templates with the first set of oligos mentioned above. This set of 5 colonies did show a stronger PCR mutant size band but the wild type band was still present (Data not shown; located UTSA TVD Notebook 7, page 22). Then we took two additional V17 groups (V17S and V17T) and prepared genomic isolations from these and again did PCR with the first set of oligos; in addition, we used the EBS universal oligo set to confirm that these clones still had the “VgrG intron” in the correct location (figure 2). Figure 2. Figure 2 represents PCR profiles from some potential VgrG mutants selected from the passaged V17 original clones Genomic templates from the V17S and T groups were used with primers specific to the VgrG gene (FTT1346 fwd NdeI and VgrG rev EcoRI, panel A); and the EBS Universal primer was used with the VgrG rev EcoRI oligo (panel B) to confirm correct location insertion of the” VgrG intron”. Lane 2 and 14 represents the wild type PCR product profiles for both sets of primers; in panel A expect 900 bp product and in panel B no product is expected. Lane 3 is the V17 original mutant profile for both panels. Lanes 4-8 represent resulting PCR products from the C17S clones 1 thru 5 and lanes 9-13 are the C17T clones 1 thru 5. In panel A the oligo set FTT1346 fwd NdeI and VgrG rev EcoRI should yield only the 1600 bp band if the VgrG mutant is complete and both VgrG genes contain the insertion mutation. However, both wild type and mutant products were evident in all these clones tested. The * marks the V17 clones that we decided to continue with by passaging in culture further (V17S4 and V17T4 clones). Panel B verifies that all mutant clones tested continue to have the “VgrG intron” at the VgrG gene location since the EBS universal is specific to the intron and the expected 800 bp product was evident. Data located in UTSA TVD Notebook 7, page 24. Note: the acronym “EBS” is the name of the universal primer designed by Sigma that is specific to the intron portion of the designed construct. This part always remains the same sequence; however, the portions specific to our desired gene varies. It stands for “exon binding site”. c. Although we do not have the complete VgrG deletion mutant the intensity of the VgrG mutant PCR product is increasing suggesting that with a few more passaging of the selected mutants (figure 2, * clones) we will be able to generate the complete VgrG mutant (that is, were both the VgrG genes are interrupted by this VgrG intron). Page 66 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble d. e. f. The igLD SchuS4 mutant was tested for virulence in a mouse experiment and the mutant was attenuated for virulence. We had 5 mice per inoculation (these inoculations were by intranasal) test groups with exception of one group (10E6) which had 6 mice. Our empirically calculated dose inoculations were 4768 (10E3), 4.768 x 10E4, 4.768 x 10E5, and 4.768 x 10E6 (total CFUs). After 35 days all the test mice (igLD inoculated) survived as well as the PBS negative control set. The positive control (the KKT1 wild-type) did die after five days with a dose of 128 CFUs. The antibody profiles for this type of infection will be done by Dr. Arul’s group; in addition, to organ deposition of inoculation (in a separate experiment). The control for successful inoculation is the wild type group which is performed with the same protocol as far as dilution preparation and dose determination by plating serial dilutions on TSA +++ plates and calculating CFU empirically. Although, sera was taken from these groups of mice before the challenge was performed. Data will be reported on next month’s report. Data located in the UTSA TVD Notebook 5, page 143, 144. We received a new Western Analysis kit and we hope that the new secondary mouse anti-sera will give a cleaner and stronger igLD immunoblot. We hope to do the repeated igLD immunoblot this coming month. Did some ordering for enzymes and general supplies for ongoing experiments. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 74% 9. Work plan for upcoming month b. Will continue the characterization of the igLD mutants (KKT9 and KKT10) in KKT1 SCHU S4 strain. This will be done by repeating the western analysis and preparing PCR products that can be sent for sequencing using various intron specific and IgLD specific oligo sets. c. Will begin the challenge of the igLD inoculated mice and follow their survival. a. Will continue with screening of the newly isolated second singles from V17S4 and V17T4 clones discussed in figure 2; to search for the correct SchuS4 VgrG mutant via PCR profiles with inside and outside oligos relative to the expected intron insertion sight. Some of these generated PCR products will be sent for sequencing to confirm correct VgrG mutant. b. If time allows will continue with cloning the pUC pdpD::Flp::ErmC fragment into the pUC118 plasmid. This should allow a complete pathogenicity island to be removed if we can generate the pdpD deletion in these mutants using this resulting construct (pUC pdpD::Flp::ErmC). 10. Anticipated travel None, I do not plan to attend the meeting in Arizona 11.Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 67 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 50 Milestone description: Phenotyping and confirmation of single gene mutants; 50.1: phenotyping and immunologic characterization of Ft subsp. novicida uvrA or uvrB; LVS uvrA or uvrB, and Ft subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) iglC strains, 50.2: phenotyping and immunologic characterization of Ft subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) pdpD, iglD strains, Ft subsp. novicida uvrA or uvrB plus pdpD/iglA/iglB/iglC/iglD double mutant strains, 50.3: phenotyping and immunologic characterization of Ft subsp. tularensis (SCHU S4) iglA, iglB strains Institution: UTSA 1. Date started: 05/01/2006 2. Date completed: provide date when milestone is completed 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions 50A: Measure intramacrophage (J774) survival of SCHU S4 iglD mutant (Note book #4 page 159-160): Murine macrophage cell line (J774) were seeded in a 96-well plate (105/200 μl/well) overnight and infected with the iglD mutant (designated KKT10) or its parental strain (SCHU S4) using an infection dose of 10 or 100 MOI. Numbers of viable bacteria in macrophages were measured at 3 hr and 24 hr postinfection. As expected, the wild type SCHU S4 replicated rapidly inside macrophages within a day using MOI of 10 or 100. However, no replication of KKT-10 (SCHU S4 iglD mutant) was observed (either 10 or 100 MOI) during the same incubation time, indicating high degree of attenuation. 6 3h CFU / well (log10) 24 h 5 4 3 2 1 SCHU S4 10 MOI KKT-10 SCHU S4 KKT-10 100 MOI Fig. 1. Intramacrophage survival of SCHU S4 iglD mutant. Murine macrophage cell line (J774) were infected with the iglD mutant or its parental strain (SCHU S4) using an inoculum of 10 or 100 MOI. Numbers of viable bacteria in macrophages were measured at 3hrs and 24 hrs post infection. Page 68 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 50B: Monitor Ft subsp. tularensis SCHU S4 replication and dissemination in mice after intragastric LVS vaccination. (Notebook #8, pages 109, 114-16, 118-21). BALB/c mice were vaccinated intragastrically with LVS (103 CFU) or mock (PBS) vaccinated. Mice were rested for three weeks and then challenged intranasally with 130 CFU of F.t. SCHU S4. Lungs, livers and spleens were collected from these mice at day 1, 3 and 4 after challenge (5 mice per time point). Numbers of SCHU S4 bacteria in each organ were determined by dilution plating. As shown in Fig. 2, there were low numbers of SCHU S4 bacteria present in the lungs of both LVS and mockvaccinated mice and no detectable bacteria in the spleens and livers at day 1 after challenge. By day 3 after challenge, there were high numbers of bacteria present in all organs in mock vaccinated mice while there were still very low levels of bacteria in the tissues of all LVS vaccinated mice. At day 4 after challenge, at a time point right before mice normally succumbed to infection, bacterial numbers were as high as 10 8 CFU in the organs of mock vaccinated mice while there remained very few bacteria in LVS vaccinated mice. These results indicate that intragastric LVS vaccination leads to decreased ability of SCHU S4 to both replicate at the sight of infection (lungs) as well as disseminate systemically (liver and spleen). LVS M oc k (PBS) CFU per Organ 1 09 1 09 Lungs Liver 1 09 1 08 1 08 1 08 1 07 1 07 1 07 1 06 1 06 1 06 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 04 1 04 1 04 1 03 1 03 1 03 1 3 4 Spleen 1 1 3 4 Days A fter SCHU S4 Challenge 3 4 Fig. 2. Kinetics of bacterial growth and clearance in target organs following LVS and mock (PBS) I.G. vaccination and subsequent F.t. SCHU S4 challenge. Bacterial burdens were determined in lungs, livers and spleens of individual mice (5 mice per time point). Dashed line represents the limit of detection. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None Page 69 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed 77% of scientific work completed on milestone 50A (original plans) 75% of scientific work completed on milestone 50B (intragastric plan) Normalized average over 1 year is 76% work completed 9. Work plan for upcoming month 50A: (1) Measure humoral responses after KKT-10 (iglD mutant of SCHU S4) intranasal immunization. (2) Assays for cell-mediated immune responses after F. novicida iglB oral immunization using cellular cytokine recall. 50B: (1) Survival after LVS I.G. vaccination and CD4+ T cell depletion/SCHU S4 challenge. 10. Anticipated Travel Will travel to UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ in October 2008. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 52 Milestone description: Create RecA mutants in F. tularensis subsp. tularensis(Schu S4) Institution: UTSA 1. Date started: 9/15/2007 2. Date completed: In progress 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions Creation of Schu S4 recA mutant 3.1 To inactivate RecA in Schu S4, we were in the process of constructing a Targetron vector for targeting and inactivating the RecA gene. The Targetron vector was designed to be constructed with the intron expression vector pKEK1140 for the backbone, and a 350bp PCR product for the insertion to mutate intron RNA representing the RecA gene a. In last monthly report, it was reported that KKT11 (recA mutant Schu S4) was mildly attenuated with the inoculum about 206CFU and only one mouse survived. On July11th (Day35 after inoculation), KKT11 group mice (one) and PBS control group mice (five) were challenged with wild type Schu S4 intranasally to evaluate the protective efficiency against wild type strain. All of 6 mice died after 5 days. Table1: The protective efficiency against wild type Schu S4 Group of Route of Dose of Survival rate mice challenge challenge(CFU) D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 KKT11 I.n. 136 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 0/1 PBS I.n. 136 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 1/5 0/5 b. From data shown on table1, the mouse was not protected by KKT11 against wild type Schu S4 challenge. Although this study didn’t have sufficient numbers of mice Page 70 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble to draw significant conclusions, the data suggests that similar to other attenuated mutants we have tested. The recA mutant does not protect against wild type Schu S4 challenge. The dose for vaccinating the mouse was low (206CFU), but we followed the procedure for inoculation, especially mixed the inoculum thoroughly for every mouse before vaccination to make sure each mouse received the same dose of mutants, so we are confident that the only surviving mouse was vaccinated with similar dose of recA mutants to the rest mice which were in the same group and died after vaccination. Data recorded on UTSA TVDC notebook #6, page42-44 for Table1. Creation of a LUX operon plasmid in Ft 3.2 A new focus of this milestone is to introduce LUX operon (LuxC, LuxD, LuxA, LuxB and LuxE) into the plasmid pKEK843 containing Ft groELp promoter to allow the generation of the bioluminescent LVS and U112. Lux operon is a set of genes which encode the luciferin-luciferase system in bacteria. LuxCDABE have been identified as active in the emission of visible light. a. In last monthly report, we reported that the effort to clone 7kb Lux operon into both pKEK843 and pUC118 failed. The low copy plasmid pWSK30 was used as the parent plasmid to replace pKEK843 or pUC118. 7kb fragment carrying Lux operon from the plasmid pUTmini5Tnkmlux was ligated into digested pWSK30, and transformed into E.coli.DH5α. The transformants were selected on LB/X-gal/Ampicillin (100ug/ml) agar medium for white colonies. About 38 colonies were selected randomly and cultured in LB/Ampicillin(100ug/ml) liquid medium. The overnight cultures were detected for bioluminecence from lux operon using the Luminometer with pUTmini5Tnkmlux/DH5 for the positive control and pWSK30/DH5 for the negative control. Colony #24 and #38 were tested to give positive signals. Data was shown) in Chart1 below Chart1: Bioluminecence of pWSK30/Lux operon 80000000 70000000 60000000 RLU 50000000 40000000 Series1 30000000 20000000 10000000 y3 3 y3 1 y3 0 y2 8 y3 8 C ol on C ol on C ol on C ol on y2 5 y2 4 y2 2 y2 1 ro l y2 7 C ol on C ol on C ol on C ol on C ol on C ol on C on t e at iv N eg Po s iti v e C on tr ol 0 Sample From data shown on Chart1, the reactive light units (RLU) from colony24 and 38 were much higher than positive control (pUTmini5Tnkmlux), hence they should be carrying lux operon. Page 71 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble b. c. Even if the new construct does not contain Francisella promoter, the data confirmed that the fragment carrying lux operon could be cloned into another plasmid and function properly from lux operon. The mutant plasmid was designated as pKEK1193. However, our goal was to construct lux operon into the plasmid carrying Francisella promoter, so pKEK843 containing the Ft promoter was the priority parent plasmid we needed to work on. Both pUTmini5Tnkmlux providing lux operon and pKEK843 serving as the backbone were digested with restriction enzyme EcoRI and treated with CIP (Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase) for the digested pKEK843 to prevent it from self-ligation. Then these two fragments purified from agarose gel were ligated and transformed into Ecoli.DH5α using electroporation. The transformants were selected on LB/Kanamycin (50ug/ml) agar plate at 37°C. About 52 colonies were patched onto the same type plate and 10 colonies were cultured in LB liquid medium with 50ug/ml Kanamycin at 37°C for overnight subsequently. 10 liquid cultures were detected in the Luminometer for bioluminecence from lux operon under the control of the Ft promoter along with pKEK843 in DH5α for negative control and pUTmini5Tnkmlux in DH5α for positive control. Colony #7 gave strong positive signal (data was shown in Chart 2). Chart 2: Bioluminecence of pKEK843/lux operon 9000000 8000000 Reactive Light Units 7000000 6000000 5000000 Series1 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 y9 y8 y7 y6 y5 y4 y3 y2 y1 y1 0 Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n Co lo n ro l Co lo n Co nt e at iv N eg Po s iti ve Co nt ro l 0 Sample From Chart 2, it was obvious that number of light units from Colony7 were much higher than Positive Control, and in contrast, other colonies presented similar signal patterns to Negative Control. Colony7 should be the one which carried lux operon under the control of Ft promoter. d. Miniprep DNA was made from colony7 for comparing the size to pKEK843 and screening. Figure1: on 1% agarose gel Page 72 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble The size of target construction was about 14.0kb which was about 7kb larger than parent plasmid pKEK843 (lane2), so colony7 (lane3) was correct, since the Lux operon is 7kb. e. The plasmid DNA from colony7 was digested with restriction enzyme XhoI and XcmI for confirmation. The new construct should be digested into three fragments (about 910kb, 4.5kb and 0.6kb), whereas pKEK843 was supposed to have two fragments (about 4.2kb and 3.2kb) after being cut with the same enzymes. Figure2: Figure3: From Figure2, colony7 (lane2 and 3) was cut into 3 pieces about the size we expected, but the control of parent plasmid pKEK843 was not available. Figure3 presents both the mutant (lane2, the same plasmid DNA as lane2 and 3 on figure2) and parent plasmid (lane3) digested with XhoI and XcmI. The 3 rd band (about 0.6kb) on lane2 was more visible on electrical file in our lab. The reason was because the amount of DNA for digestion was not enough and also the agarose gel was run beyond the usual time so as to separate two fragments on lane3. Page 73 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble f. Since colony7 was verified by detection of bioluminecence and confirmed by size of the plasmid as well as digestion with restriction enzymes, it was designated as pKEK1194. Data recorded on UTSA TVDC notebook #2, page127-140 for Chart1, Chart2, Figure1, 2 and 3. 4 Significant decisions made or pending None. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed pKEK1193 (pWSK30/lux operon) but without the Ft promoter pKEK1194 (pKEK843/lux operon) with the Ft promoter 7. Quality of performance Good 8. Percentage completed. About 32% of scientific work completed. 9. Work plan for upcoming month i. ii. Transform pKEK1194 into U112. Transform pKEK1194 into LVS. 10. Anticipated travel Will travel to the UNM TVDC annual meeting in October 2008. 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None. Milestone 55 Milestone description: Compare Cellular Immunogenicity of Francisella and ListeriaBased Vaccine Platforms. Measure cellular immunogenicity of live-attenuated vaccine platforms. Compare immunogenicity of KBMA tularemia vaccine platforms Institution: Cerus/Anza 1. Date started: 4/1/2008 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions Summary of objectives: We will construct and prepare live and KBMA Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) vaccines expressing Ft antigens. To directly compare the cellular immunogenicity of Lm and Ft-based vaccines, each Lm vaccine candidate will express an antigen fused to a model ovalbumin epitope SIINFEKL (SL8) and these will be compared to Ft vaccines expressing pepOSL8 fusions (provided by UTSA). We will measure the ability of each vaccine to stimulate a CD8 T cell response in vitro using a B3Z assay. We will measure the cytokine responses elicited by vaccination with each platform in mice, compare the CD8 T cell response to SL8 after prime and boost vaccinations in mice using intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and ELIspot assays and measure the potency of the T cells elicited by use of an in vivo cytotoxicity assay. We previously demonstrated that iglC-SL8 fusion proteins are expressed to a higher level than katG-SL8 in the cytosol of macrophages. Live attenuated vaccines expressing either antigen were able to stimulate the B3Z-Tcell line. The iglC-SL8 fusion protein induced a stronger immune response in mice than katG-SL8 by ICS and ELISpot. Incorporation of a constitutively active prfA allele into the chromosome of the live-attenuated LM-igl-C-SL8 vaccine increased immunogenicity by 2-fold. Inclusion of a much larger tag (containing an additional 4 epitopes from vaccinia virus) decreased the immunogenicity of the Lm vaccine. Page 74 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 1) Cloning of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) tularemia vaccine strains. A summary of vaccine candidates that have been constructed is presented in table #1 below. No new vaccine candidates were constructed in July. The work plan proposed for July was not accomplished do to personal holidays and increased effort on MS 56. The cloning, comparative immunogenicity experiments, and quality control of the Ft lots will be performed in the following month. Table 1 Strain Genetic Background Antigen Cassette Status CRS-100 actAinlB none Sequence verified BH137 ActAN100-Ova Sequence verified actAinlB BH1222 ActAN100-IglC-SL8 Sequence verified actAinlB BH2106 ActAN100-KatG-SL8 Sequence verified actAinlB BH1228 ActAN100-IglC-SL8 Sequence verified actAinlBuvrAB BH1398 ActAN100-KatG-SL8 Sequence verified actAinlBuvrAB BH2094 ActAN100-IglC-SL8 Complete actAinlBuvrABprfAG155S BH2172 ActAN100-KatG-SL8 Complete actAinlBuvrABprfAG155S BH2098 ActAN100-IglC-VacQuad-SL8 Complete actAinlB BH2100 ActAN100-IglC-VacQuad-SL8 Complete actAinlBuvrABprfAG155S BH2180 ActAN100-IglC-B8R (@ comK) Complete actAinlB BH2182 ActAN100-IglC-B8R (@ comK) Complete actAinlBuvrABprfAG155S BH2184 ActAN100-IglC-B8R (@ comK) Complete actAinlB ActAN100-KatG-SL8 (@tRNAarg) 4. Significant decisions made or pending Because the vaccinia virus quadrotope tag significantly decreased the immunogenicity of the iglC vaccine, this tag will not be used for further immunogenicity studies. 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Excellent 8. Percentage completed 12% 9. Work plan for upcoming month We will construct the bivalent IglC/KatG LM vaccine strain on the KBMA background We will evaluate the immunogenicity of the bivalent Lm strain expressing IglCB8R and KatG-SL8 fusion proteins and compare the immunogenicity with each monovalent strain We will produce a lot of live Ftn-PepO-SL8 The 400mL-scale lots of vaccine will be undergo quality testing (e.g. cfu analysis and metabolic activity assays) 10. Anticipated travel Will travel to the UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ on October 6 and 7, 2008 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 75 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Milestone 56 Milestone description: Characterize the Cellular Immune Response that Correlates with Protection Against an LVS Challenge and demonstrate that Cerus Strains of Live and KBMA Lm-IglC and Lm-KatG Protect Against a SchuS4 Challenge Institution: Cerus/Anza 1. Date started: 6/1/2008 2. Date completed: Pending 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions Summary of objectives: We will measure the T-cell response to IglC induced by live and KBMA Lm expressing IglC compared with those elicited by Ftn or LVS vaccination. We will produce an IglC overlapping peptide library (15aa overlapping by 11aa) to identify IglC epitopes that are recognized by mouse T cells. We will use the IglC peptide library for ELISpot and ICS assays to measure the IglC-specific T cell responses induced after vaccination with live and KBMA Lm-IglC and compare to live and KBMA Ftn and LVS vaccination. We will demonstrate that the mechanism of protection induced by Lm vaccines is cellular by depletion of T cell populations and passive transfer studies, We will demonstrate that strains of Live and KBMA Lm-IglC-SL8 and Lm-KatG-SL8 protect against a SchuS4 challenge and we will produce lots of KBMA vaccine and send to UNM for testing in animal models (mice and rats). 1) To determine whether Lm strains expressing IglC can induce IglC-specific immune responses, five different strains of mice were vaccinated intravenously with 1106 CFU of Lm-IglC (∆actA inlB ∆uvrAB prfA* G155S-IglC-SL8; BH2094) and spleens were removed after seven days. Since IglC-specific immune epitopes have not yet been identified, a peptide library consisting of 51 15-mer peptides that overlap by 11 amino acids and span the entire IglC sequence was used as stimulation in ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays. The IglC peptide library was divided into two separate pools (IglC pool1 and IglC pool2) and also used as individual peptides. Five strains of mice (Balb/c, C57BL/6, FVB/NJ, C3H/HeJ, and SJL/J) were used in this study to look for iglC-specific immune responses in animals with different MHC haplotypes (d, b, q, k, and s2, respectively). Using the ELISpot assay, after a single vaccination with Lm-IglC, immune responses to IglC pool2 could be measured in all mouse strains (fig. 1). The IglC pool2specific response was highest in FVBN mice. Each mouse strain also responded to a pool of LLO peptides that was used as a positive control for the ELISpot assay. LLO is a secreted virulence determinant from Lm that was been well characterized as an antigen in Balb/c and C57BL/6 mice. A weak response to IglC pool1 could be measured in C3H/HeJ mice. Page 76 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report iglC pool2 400 200 200 0 SJL C3H C57BL/6 FVBN 0 400 SJL 600 unstim LLO pool C3H iglC pool1 FVBN unstim LLO pool-specific response 600 C57BL/6 800 Balb/c IFN- SFC per 2e5 splenocytes IglC responses Balb/c IFN- SFC per 2e5 splenocytes Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Figure 1. Immune responses to IglC after a single immunization with live-attenuated Lm-IglC vaccine strain BH2094 were measured using ELISpot. IglC pool1 contains peptides 15, 18, 17, 20, 12, 19, 11, 6, 23, 8, 25, 3, 24, 51, 47, 50, 45, 29, 26, 27, 36, 43, 42, 44, 31, 32. IglC pool2 contains peptides 14, 16, 21, 22, 13, 4, 5, 7, 10, 9, 1, 2, 48, 46, 49, 28, 39, 40, 38, 37, 34, 41, 35, 30, 33. Immune responses against LLO (a strong Lm antigen) were measured as a positive control. Wells without peptides (unstimulated) were used a negative control NB #2000, pages 11-14. 2) Using multicolor flow cytometry after stimulation with the peptide pools it was possible to distinguish whether the T cells that were stimulated in each mouse strain were CD4 or CD8 positive cells. After a single vaccination with Lm-IglC, immune responses to IglC pool2 were again detectable in all mouse strains using ICS (fig 2). The IglC pool2specific response was highest in FVBN mice, with greater than1% IFN-g+ CD4+ T cells. In Balb/c and SJL mice, the IglC pool2 responses were lower, at 0.4% and less than 0.1% IFN-g+ CD4+ cells respectively. In C57BL/6 mice, 4% IFN-g+ CD8+ T cells were measured. Interestingly, Lm-IglC induced similar levels of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific for IglC in C3H/HeJ mice (0.5%). The LLO pool was used as control and high levels of CD8+ T cells were seen in Balb/c mice and high levels of CD4+ T cells were seen in C57BL/6 mice as expected. As seen in the ELISpot assay, all responses to iglC pool1 were very low (all below 0.15%). These results confirm the ELISpot results and demonstrate that mice can induce T cell responses against IglC and further demonstrate that the T cell responses can be CD4, CD8 or both depending on the haplotype of the mice used. iglC pool2 0 -2 C3H/HeJ SJL -0.5 C3H/HeJ 0.0 2 FVB/N 0.5 C57BL/6 1.0 CD8 4 Balb/c % IFN- T cells 1.5 FVB/N SJL C3H/HeJ FVB/N 0.00 CD4 CD8 C57BL/6 0.05 2.0 Balb/c % IFN- T cells 0.10 C57BL/6 6 CD4 CD8 Balb/c % IFN- T cells CD4 0.15 -0.05 LLO pool 2.5 Figure 2. Immune responses to IglC pools after a single immunization with live attenuated Lm-IglC vaccine Page 77 of 82 SJL iglC pool1 0.20 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble strain BH2094 were measured using ICS NB #2000, pages 11-14. Note that the Y axis scales are different between the panels in this figure. Using all of the individual peptides in the IglC peptide library in an ELISpot assay, the peptides that contain the immunogenic regions of IglC could be identified for each mouse strain (fig 3). In Balb/C mice peptide 33 stimulated a low response and while peptide 34 stimulated a high response suggesting that the immune epitope(s) are contained within the amino acids covered by peptides 33 and 34. In C57BL/6 mice the immune epitope(s) are contained within the amino acids covered by peptides 34-35. With FVB/N mice there were two immunogenic regions covered by peptide 24 and peptides 37-38. C3H/HeJ mice responded to two independent regions spanning peptides 23-24 and peptide 33-36. In SJL mice, responses were found to individual peptides 38, 46, and 50. Interestingly, each mouse strain responded to peptides in the region spanning peptide 33-38, suggesting that this region of IglC is highly immunogenic. BH2094 (actAinlBuvrAB prfA*-iglC) in Balb/c mice 180 160 140 Peptide #33, 34 QEYKTDEAWGIMIDL TDEAWGIMIDLSNLE IFNg SFC/2e5 cells 120 100 80 60 40 20 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 BH2094 (actAinlBuvrAB prfA*-iglC) in C57BL/6 mice 60 50 Peptide #34, 35 TDEAWGIMIDLSNLE WGIMIDLSNLELYPI 40 30 20 10 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 1 IFNg SFC/2e5 cells 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 9 12 11 8 10 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Page 78 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble BH2094 (actAinlBuvrAB prfA*-iglC) in FVB/N mice 800 Peptide #37, 38 NLELYPISAKAFSIS YPISAKAFSISIEPT 700 600 IFNg SFC/2e5 cells 500 400 Peptide #24 VLIKSNVRTKIEEKV 300 200 100 49 50 51 51 48 50 47 49 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 9 11 8 10 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 BH2094 (actAinlBuvrAB prfA*-iglC) in C3H mice 90 Peptide #33, 34, 35, 36 QEYKTDEAWGIMIDL TDEAWGIMIDLSNLE WGIMIDLSNLELYPI IDLSNLELYPISAKA 80 70 IFNg SFC/2e5 cells 60 50 Peptide #23,24 ITLGVLIKSNVRTKI VLIKSNVRTKIEEKV 40 30 20 10 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 BH2094 (actAinlBuvrAB prfA*-iglC) in SJL mice 120 Peptide #37, 38 NLELYPISAKAFSIS YPISAKAFSISIEPT 100 IFNg SFC/2e5 cells 80 60 Peptide #46 DGLTTSQGSLPVCCA 40 Peptide #50 STDKGVAKIGYIAAA 20 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Figure 3. Epitope mapping using the ELISpot assay. Splenocytes from each mouse strain were stimulated with individual peptides from the overlapping peptide library to determine the immunogenic region of the protein NB #2000, pages 11-14. By then using individual 15-mer peptides in an ICS assay, we were able to confirm that these peptides could stimulate an IglC-specific response. We determined that the response to peptide 34 was mediated by CD4+ T cells in Balb/c mice (fig. 4). In C57BL/6 mice, we determined that the immune response to peptides 34 and 35 is IM08-059 mediated by CD8+ T cells. In FVB/N mice we determined that the strong responses to peptides 37 and 38 were mediated by CD4+ T cells. As controls, the immunodominant peptides from LLO were used in Balb/c and C57BL/6 mice and the responses to the immunodominant peptides was similar in magnitude to the LLO pool. The SL8 peptide was also used in C57BL/6 mice as a positive control and the responses to this immunodominant ovalbumin epitope were 25% after a single vaccination. These ICS and ELISpot results demonstrate that IglC induces a cellular immune response when secreted from a live-attenuated Lm vaccine strain. We will also determine whether mice vaccinated with LVS induce an immune response to the same peptides as those induced by Lm and we will compare the magnitude of the immune responses. Since CD8+ T cell epitopes are typically between 8 and 10 amino acids in length, 9-mer peptides that overlap by 8 amino acids and span both peptides 34 and 35 Page 79 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble will be used to better define the C57BL/6 iglC CD8+ epitope. Similar analysis will be done to define the CD8+ epitope in C3H/HeJ mice. Balb/c % IFN- T cells 2 1 Figure 4. Immune responses against individual 15aa IglC peptides were detected by ICS on splenocytes from mice vaccinated with Lm-IglC NB #2000, pages 11-14.. 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address UNM and Anza area negotiating the MTA language to allow sharing of information and reagents from UCLA. 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Excellent 8. Percentage completed 10% 9. Work plan for upcoming month Anza will order 9mer peptides to identify optimal CD8 T cell epitopes Anza will vaccinate mice with LVS and Lm to compare the IglC Reponses Anza will vaccinate mice with various Lm vaccines to determine whether IglC, KatG, or both protect against lethal LVS infection Once MTA is approved, live and KBMA Lm lots can be sent to UNM for evaluation in SchuS4 challenge model 10. Anticipated travel 11. Will travel to the UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ on October 6 and 7, Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Milestone 57 Milestone description: Optimization of KBMA Lm Vaccination Route and Regimen. Institution: Cerus/Anza 1. Date started: 6/1/2008 2. Date completed: Pending Page 80 of 82 LLO pool 38 37 unstim LLO pool 0 LLO 190 LLO pool LLO 91 unstim 34 0 CD8 SL8 1 CD4 CD8 35 2 CD4 34 3 3 30 28 26 24 22 20 10 8 6 4 2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 unstim CD8 % IFN- T cells % IFN- T cells CD4 4 FVBN C57BL/6 5 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble 3. Work performed and progress including data and preliminary conclusions Summary of objectives: We will compare various routes of administration including IV, IM, IN, ID and oral. For oral, IN, and ID administration in mice, we will first mutate the inlA gene of Lm to allow for binding of murine E-cadherin in order to mimic the human interaction as described in Wollert et al., Cell, 2007). We will compare the potency of the inlA gain of function mutants to our traditional platform strain. Routes will be ranked by ability to induce a cellular immune response using ELISpot, ICS, and in vivo cytotoxicity. We will optimize dosing regimen of most potent and tolerable route. Lm expressing IglC and/or KatG will be used to evaluate immunogenicity. Optimized route and regimen will be confirmed by SchuS4 protection studies at UNM. We have previously constructed vaccine candidates that contain the inlA gain of function mutations (Table 2). The sequence of the wild-type EGDe inlA gene (from the Lm strain used in the Wollert manuscript) was synthesized and the inlA gene in our platform strain was replaced (inlAWT) in our live-attenuated and KBMA platform strains as there are a number of differences in the sequence between the native sequences between these strains. Two point mutations, S192N and Y369S, were incorporated into the EGDe inlA sequence (inlAM) and inserted into the chromosome of our live-attenuated and KBMA platform strains. Into these 4 strains the ActAN100-iglC-SL8 expression cassette was inserted using the integration vector pINT. Expression analysis of the iglC-SL8 cassette has yet to be performed. Once the expression has been confirmed, biodistribution, virulence and immunogenicity studies (ICS and ELIspot) will be performed. No new lab work was performed in July 2008 on MS 57due to the focus on MS 56. Table 2 Strain CRS-100 BH2130 BH2164 BH2170 BH2164 BH2132 BH2166 BH2134 BH2168 Genetic Background actAinlB actAinlBinlAWT actAinlBinlAWT actAinlBinlAM actAinlBinlAM actAinlBuvrABprfAG155SinlAWT actAinlBuvrABprfAG155SinlAWT actAinlBuvrABprfAG155SinlAM actAinlBuvrABprfAG155SinlAM Antigen Cassette none none ActAN100-IglC-SL8 none ActAN100-IglC-SL8 none ActAN100-iglC-SL8 none ActAN100-iglC-SL8 Status Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified Sequence verified 4. Significant decisions made or pending None 5. Problems or concerns and strategies to address None 6. Deliverables completed None 7. Quality of performance Excellent 8. Percentage completed 2% 9. Work plan for upcoming month Page 81 of 82 Tularemia Vaccine Development Contract: Technical Report Period: 7/01/2008 to 7/31/2008 Due Date: 8/15/2008 and Prepared by: C. Rick Lyons, Barbara Griffith, Terry Wu, Amanda Dubois, Bob Sherwood, Julie Wilder, Trevor Brasel, Julie Hutt, Dana Pohlman, Michelle Valderas, Karl Klose, Bernard Arulanandam, Stephen Johnston, Kathryn Sykes, Mitch Magee, Justin Skoble Expression from the iglC-SL8 expression cassette will be confirmed in each of these strains Virulence and immunogenicity of inlAWT and inlAM expressing live-attenuated strains will be evaluated in the coming month. 10. Anticipated travel Will travel to the UNM TVDC annual meeting in Phoenix AZ on October 6 and 7 11. Upcoming Contract Authorization (COA) for subcontractors None Page 82 of 82