In a Food Preparation and Service Setting Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8. Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org. On Sept 11, 2001 the U.S. was attacked The U.S. government has declared the food and agriculture sector to be one of 17 critical national infrastructures vulnerable to intentional attack. What Type of Harm Could Occur? Intentional delivery of a harmful biological or chemical agent to the food supply system could cause: Physical harm (illness or mortality) Economic disruption Direct Indirect International Political unrest Psychological harm – loss of confidence in food supply Will this Effect Missouri? Missouri Restaurant Industry: Over 13,000 locations in the state 2007 projections employment = 273,500 sales = $8.1 billion Each $1 spent in MO restaurants = $1.38 in sales for other industries Each $1 million spent in MO restaurants = 43.7 jobs Case Study: Polonium 210 November 23, 2006 Alexander Litvinenko died of acute radiation poisoning due ingesting a large dose of Polonium 210. 1st person to die of acute α-particle radiation effects Most likely mixed into tea Highly toxic Difficult to find and identify Supplies Grapes of Wrath A terrorist group claimed to have contaminated Chilean grapes with cyanide. Fruit was removed from U.S. stores, consumers stopped purchasing Chilean fruit. Only 2 grapes were found to have possible contamination. The threat caused $200-300 million in damages. Distribution Food Service No Bleu Cheese Please! In 1984, members of an Oregon cult intentionally contaminated restaurant salad bars with Salmonella bacteria. They were attempting to influence an election. 751 individuals became ill, 45 were hospitalized. Food Defense focuses on security, protecting the food supply from intentional contamination. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8. Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org. Is Food Defense Different than Food Safety? Food Defense focuses on protecting the food supply from intentional contamination. Food Safety (HACCP) focuses on protecting the food supply from unintentional contamination. It can help with, but is not a substitute for food defense. Who Might Intentionally Contaminate an Food Service Facility? Disgruntled employee/former employee Contract or temporary employee Members of terrorist or extremist groups Truck driver Affiliate of a competing facility Visitor to facility Rats! Rival Chinese Businesses use banned rat poison containing Tetramine to harm a competitor’s business Businessman poisons food Owner of rival of rival noodle shop with Tetramine. Poisoning sickens 400 kills 49 (soldiers and school children) Kindergarten contaminates lunch with Tetramine Poisoning effects 70 kindergarteners and 2 teachers Potential Contaminants Biological Agents: Injure by causing disease, or producing toxin. Chemical Agents: Injure through toxicity to biological systems, or chemical burns to tissue. Radiological Agents: Injure externally with radiation burns and potentially deadly acute radiation sickness. Injure internally by causing damage to internal organs. Biological Agents of Concern Category A: Easily to use, high death rate Bacillus anthracis (Anthrax) Clostridium botulinum toxin (Botulism) Bacillus anthracis Category B: Moderately easy to use, moderate illness, low death rate, hard to diagnose E. coli O157:H7 Salmonella spp.(Salmonellosis) Shigella spp.(Dysentery) Clostridium botulinum E. coli Not categorized: Naturally occurring, can cause symptoms in humans. Listeria monocytogenes (Listeriosis) Campylobacter jejuni Campylobacter jejuni Chemical Agents Biotoxin (Ricin or Abrin) disrupt protein synthesis Aconitine α-Amanitin Metal (Arsenic) damages blood cells Blood Agent (Cyanide) disrupts oxygen usage. Nerve Agent (Sarin) prevents nerves from controlling muscle contractions Radiological Agents Polonium 210 Plutonium Uranium 238 (U- 238) What Makes an Attractive Agent of Intentional Contamination? Long Incubation period Highly effective (Potent, toxic, virulent) History of use (increases future chance of use Available (easily produced in adequate quantity) Low traceability Following several major food recalls in the US, consumer surveys were conducted. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8. Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org. Consumer Confidence in Food Defense Systems After National Food Recalls Stinson et al., 2008 Who Do Consumers Believe is Responsible for Food Defense? Government 31% Farmers 12% Manufacturers and Processors 27% Consumers 11% Retailers 10% Transporters and Distrubuters 9% Stinson et al., 2008 Who do Consumers Believe Should Pay for Food Defense? Government 30% Consumers 8% Farmers 15% Manufacturers and Processors 22% Retailers 12% Transporters and Distrubuters 13% Stinson et al., 2008 Products That Consumers Believe Most Likely to be Intentionally Contaminated June 2007 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Produce Dairy Meat Seafood Baked Canned Boxed Stinson et al., 2008 Defense plans are encouraged but not required for farms and most food establishments. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8. Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org. Facilities Currently Required to Participate in Food Defense All vendors providing food for USDA feeding programs must now be in compliance with the Food Defense System. Four Steps for Developing a Food Defense Plan Assess the vulnerabilities Write a plan Evaluate the plan Maintain the plan Assess the vulnerabilities Gather a team of key personnel to make the assessment. Use FDA Guidelines: Guidance for Industry Retail Food Stores and Food Service Establishments: Food Security Preventive Measures Guidance http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/guidance.html. Think like someone who wants to harm your operation. Look for areas where contamination would be spread through normal operations and areas that are not frequently observed. Café Vulnerability Assessment Countermeasures Countermeasuresare areactions actionstaken takento to shield shieldvulnerable vulnerableareas, areas,reducing reducingthe the risk riskof ofintentional intentionalcontamination. contamination. Areas to Consider for Countermeasure Development Procedures Facility Technology Personnel Countermeasures for Procedures Workforce Shipping and Receiving Visitors and Customers Marketing Countermeasures for Facility Light it Lock it Limit Access Write the Plan Develop a countermeasure to defend each vulnerable point identified as high risk. Create a written plan including those countermeasures that are reasonable for the situation. Identify the individual who will implement the countermeasure. Set a timeline to implement the countermeasure. Café Food Defense Plan Should such an event occur a timely and efficient response will be critical to minimizing the damage. Develop a Written Response Plan Plan for handling of contaminated product Emergency Planning Facility Map Emergency Contact Phone List Visitor Log Supplier/Customer Contacts Employee Emergency Information Handling of Contaminated Product Hold any food you suspect may be contaminated Retained or recalled product will need to be stored prior to disposal Storage will need to be separate from non contaminated product Prepare a plan for disposal, to be reviewed by FDA and state authorities FDA will witness the execution of the plan Café Containment and Disposal Plan Facility Map Name, address, and phone of owner/proprietor Relationship of the facility to adjacent properties and/or structures. Road access including transportation routes Perimeter boundaries, include fences, and gates (with dimensions) Facility Map continued Buildings, outbuildings, doors, windows, AC/heating, ventilation Utilities (water, gas, electric, phones) location and shutoff Septic System and drainage areas with direction of flow Web sites such as Google Earth www.earth.google.com Facility Map Owner : Hal Hashslinger 1745 Crepe Circle Cookstown, MO 65xxx H2O H2O H2O Interior door Interior door Interior door Utility shut offs Interior door H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O Exterior door Exterior door Exterior door Café Emergency Phone List Café Supplier Contact List Café Employee Emergency Contacts References www.fsis.usda.gov www.cfsan.fda.gov www.bt.cdc.go www.morerestaurants.org