UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Gamma Ray Large Area Space Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Astrophysics Seminar – Feb 14, 2006 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Outline Overview of the GLAST Observatory • Current status of two instruments (GBM and LAT) GLAST Science • Highlights of Instrument Capabilities • Selected Physics Topics • Gamma Ray Bursts • Particle Acceleration Active Galactic Nuclei Supernova Remnants • Diffuse g Ray Emission • Dark Matter Searches and New Physics Timeline E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST Observatory : Overview GLAST will measure the direction, energy and arrival time of celestial g rays Principal Investigator: Peter Michelson LAT will record gamma-rays in the energy range ~ 20 MeV to >300 GeV Orbit 565 km, circular GBM will provide correlative observations of transient events in the energy range ~10 keV – 25 MeV Observing modes All sky survey Pointed observations Re-pointing Capabilities Autonomous Rapid slew speed (75° in < 10 minutes) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Inclination 28.5o Lifetime 5 years (min) Will follow on the measurements by its predecessor (EGRET) with unprecedented capabilities Launch Date Sep 2007 Launch Vehicle Delta 2920H-10 Launch Site Kennedy Space Center UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST Burst Monitor: Overview NaI and BGO counters exposed to the entire sky Principal Investigator: Charles Meegan NaI crystals (12) low-energy spectral coverage ~10 keV to ~1 MeV rough burst locations BGO crystals (2) high-energy spectral coverage ~150 keV to ~30 MeV GBM 10 keV to ~ 25 MeV Correlative observations of transient phenomena E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Spectral Measurements measures spectra for bursts connects with LAT measurements Afterglows in Gamma Ray Bursts Wide Sky Coverage (8 sr) autonomous repoint for exceptionally bright bursts that occur outside LAT field of view Connections to the Ground Network of Telescopes burst alerts to the LAT and ground telescopes within seconds UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Current Status of GBM Assembly 12 NaI modules E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 2 BGO modules Environmental Tests at Max Planck Institute UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Large Area Telescope: Overview Principal Investigator: Peter Michelson The LAT is a pair-conversion telescope of 16 towers surrounded by plastic scintillators g Silicon Microstrip Tracker ~ 80 m2 of silicon 8.8 x 105 readout channels Strip pitch = 228 µm xy layers interleaved with W converters ~1.5 X0 Calorimeter Hodoscopic array Array of 1536 CsI(Tl) crystals in 8 layers ~8.5 X0 Anti-Coincidence Detector 89 scintillator tiles Segmented design E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Silicon Microstrip Tracker Measures g direction g identification Calorimeter Measures g energy Shower imaging e+ e– LAT 3000 kg, 650 W (allocation) 1.8 m 1.8 m 1.0 m 20 MeV – 300 GeV Currently there is no other telescope covering this energy range Anti-Coincidence Detector Rejects background of charged cosmic rays segmentation removes selfveto effects at high energy UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 LAT Integration @ SLAC Calorimeter module Tracker module LAT Integration & Test Team Anti Coincidence Detector being integrated with 16 towers E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 LAT Data from Tests at SLAC From A. Borgland Muon candidates Most of the 500 Hz of triggers recorded are muons Photon Candidates? ~20% of cosmic ray showers are not muons E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Science with GLAST I will cover only few selected topics High Energy Sky Survey : • Unidentified EGRET sources and GLAST Source Catalog • • Population Studies • • AGN jets energy conversion shocks in SNRs role of hadrons in radiation processes High-energy behavior of transients : • • Galactic and Extragalactic Physics of particle acceleration • • • • To avoid peculiarities of individual sources (AGN, Pulsars, SNR…) Diffuse Gamma ray emission • • unresolved point sources Gamma Ray Bursts Solar Flares LAT strengths: All-sky monitoring Broad range of time scales Energy range Discovery Potential: • • • • New classes of astrophysical objects Origin of Extragalactic Background Searches for Dark Matter and Extra Dimensions Tests of Lorentz Invariance E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 LAT will Rediscover the g Ray Sky GLAST 1 year all sky survey E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Source class Seen by EGRET Predicted with GLAST Unidentified sources 170 ? Rotation powered pulsars 3-6 100-500 AGN (mostly blazars) 50-80 >2000 Normal galaxies 2 4-5 Gamma ray bursts 5 >500 Supernova Remnants/plerions 1-5 >10 Radio galaxies 1-1 ? X ray binaries/microquasars 1-1 ? Starburst galaxies 0 ? Cluster of galaxies 0 ? UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 3rd Comparison of Instrument Performance EGRET Catalog LAT Simulation EGRET LAT E > 100 MeV E > 100 MeV Pointing 1991-2001 All sky 2007 - ? 5 yr operation requirement 10 yr operation goal Improvement Energy 30 MeV - 30 GeV Peak effective area 1500 cm² Field of view Sensitivity (1yr) 0.5 sr ~ 10-7 g cm-2 s-1 Localization (bright source) Deadtime E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 15 ’ 100 ms 20 MeV - 300 GeV > 8000 cm² >5 > 2.0 sr >4 < 6 10-9 g cm-2 s-1 > 20 < 0.5 ’ > 30 < 30 ms > 1000 Large area Low instrumental background UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 All Sky Monitoring with Improved Sensitivity All-sky survey: sensitivity after O(1) day to detect the weakest EGRET sources at (5s) level ! 100 sec Fraction of the g ray sky 100 sec observed within 2 min - GRB940217 (100sec) - PKS 1622-287 flare - 3C279 flare - Vela Pulsar 1 orbit ~ 90 min - Crab Pulsar - 3EG 2020+40 (SNR g Cygni?) zenith-pointed - 3EG 1835+59 - 3C279 lowest 5s detection - 3EG 1911-2000 (AGN) - Mrk 421 - Weakest 5s EGRET source 1 day 1~day EGRET Flux rocking” all-sky scan: alternating orbits point above/below the orbit plane E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST/LAT performance Thin Thick Intrinsic resolution of the tracker Slide from N. Omodei Energy Resolution: ~10% (~5% off-axis) PSF (68%) at 100 MeV ~ 5o PSF (68%) at 10 GeV ~ 0.1o Field Of View: 2.4 sr Point Source sens. (>100 MeV): 3x10-9 cm-2 s-1 Thin converters (3%) Thin Thick Full Tkr E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Thick converters (18%) No converters F.o.V.: 2.4 sr UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Gamma Ray Bursts: GBM and LAT GBM • Huge field of view (8sr) • Measure spectra for bursts from 10 keV to 30 MeV LAT • Wide field of view (>2sr) • Extends spectral coverage to higher energies GLAST Can be re-pointed to catch exceptionally bright bursts that occur outside the LAT field of view GLAST all-sky monitoring will be follow transient phenomena to a wide range of time scales from ~ 30 µs (GRB, solar flares) to hours or longer (AGN) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC + Simulated GBM and LAT response to timeintegrated flux from bright GRB 940217 Spectral model parameters from CGRO wide-band fit 1 NaI (14 º) and 1 BGO (30 º) NaI BGO LAT UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Some GRB Experimental Facts Intensity, location, rate • Typical fluences • Cosmological distances • 1 /Myrs/galaxy 940217 (Hurley 1994) Energy Spectrum • Non-thermal emission z~1 Rate 10-4 to -7 ergs cm-2 up to g rays (3 GeV) Temporal properties • Rapid flux variations • miliseconds Range of burst durations few seconds to hours E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Transients are hard to catch! UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 High Energy Emission in GRB 941017 Compare data from EGRET and BATSE: high-energy component has different time behavior than sub–MeV component! Low Energy < 3 MeV Epeak ~ 0.5 MeV Duration ~ 100s Where is the high-energy peak? Is there a cut-off? internal or external shocks? High Energy > 3 MeV dN/dE ~ E-1 Duration ~ 200s hadrons or electrons? Is the spectral index timedependent ? How common is this GRB ? -18 to 14 s 14 to 47 s high energy component start to develop 47 to 80 s 80 to 113 s 113 to 211 s BASTE-LAD Gonzalez et al 2003 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Need GLAST data!! EGRET-TASC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Fireball Model Kobayashi, Piran & Sari 1999 z=43 E=1052 ergs h=50 R =3×1010 cm UInt to UKin External Shock Plethora of models • Shells HOT HOT COLD Reverse Forward Relativistic or Newtonian • External Medium COLD thin or thick • Shocks Ukin to UISM ISM or wind like E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC shock Fireball shock ISM ISM UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 High Energy Emission Models Leptonic Models No definitive answer yet… Hard to model IC Hadronic models (Pe’er Waxman 2005) • • • Shocks: Internal/ External? Forward/ Reverse? IC Synchroton E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC KN regime HE EM cascades Large t from e+- Proton Synchrotron pp, pn , pg UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Modeling High Energy Emission for GRB941017 Two models used • External shock (Pe’er &Waxmann 2004) e- accelerated in FS IC scatter g from RS SSA is important • Internal Shock (Granot & Guetta 2003) e- in FS IC scatter g whlle RS is going on SSC from RS (depends on spectal index) eB ~ 10-7 Dt = 10-5 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC High Energy data constrains Total energy, Lorentz factor and ambient density Pe’er & Waxman 2004 E = 3 × 1054 ergs, n = 0.10 cm-3, G i = 300, eB,r = 10-1, eB,f= 10-6, z = 0.10 E = 1 × 1055 ergs, n = 0.10 cm-3, G i = 200, eB,r = 10-3, eB,f= 10-5, z = 0.10 E = 1 × 1054 ergs, n = 0.03 cm-3, G i = 220, eB,r = 0.2, eB,f= 10-6, z = 0.06 E = 3 × 1052 ergs, n = 0.10 cm-3, G i = 1500, eB,r = 10-7, eB,f= 10-7, z = 0.15 Flux between 100 and 200 s after the burst Data from Gonzalez et al 2003 GRB941017 GBM LAT Dt = 10-5 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Shock Plasma Parameters Luminosity of the Source • L ~ 1052 ergs s-1 Lorentz Factor of Bulk Plasma • G ~ 102 to 103 DT ~ 10-4 to 10-3 s eB ~ 1 to 10-5 Ratio of peaks in SED (GLAST + X ray Detector?) Fraction of Thermal Electron Energy Density behind the shock • ee ~ 1 to 10-5 ~30 ms deadtime with GLAST (EGRET was 100 ms) Fraction of Magnetic Energy Density behind the shock • cut-offs at the energy spectrum (GLAST + IACT?) Time Variability • GLAST may measure Epeak Can we use GLAST measurements to help constrain these parameters? Ratio of peaks in SED (GLAST + X ray Detector?) Energy distribution of accelerated electrons • p (power law index) ~ 2 to 3 SED fits (GLAST + X ray Detector?) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Are p, eB ee time independent? (Paitanescu and Kumar 2001) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Multiwavelength Observations to Constrain Models Model • Prompt emission from internal shocks in relativistic wind Pe’er & Wazman 2004 • Spectra as high as 10 GeV Flux has a strong dependence on G Measure cut-offs with GLAST! Ratio of peaks in kev/GeV can be used to constrain ratio of eB / ee LAT + GBM? Swift + GLAST? Caveat: • single shell collisions E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 100 keV eB = 0.33 eB = 0.01 eB = 0.0001 1 GeV l’ < 10 G = 600 Dt = 10-4 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Which model should we choose? Region I • Proton synchroton hard with GLAST large eB Region II • Inverse Compton good for GLAST denser medium helps Typical from afterglows (Painatescu & Kumar 2001) (Painatescu & Kumar 2002) small eB :internal shocks Region III • Electron synchroton not in GLAST range E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Zhang && Meszaros 2001 Zhang Meszaros 2001 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 We need DATA ! Region I Zhang & Meszaros 2001 z = 0.1 z=1 • Proton synchroton hard with GLAST large eB Region II • Inverse Compton good for GLAST denser medium helps Region III • Electron synchroton not in GLAST range E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC eB = 10-4 ee = 0.5 GRB 940217 (Hurley 1994) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Delayed High Energy Emission in GRB940217 LAT • Large effective Area (can probe smaller fluxes) • Extends spectral coverage to higher energies GBM will cover down to few keV E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC GRB 940217 (Hurley 1994) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Can we constrain p and G from GRB940217? Guetta & Granot 2003 Model • Prompt emission from internal shocks • G = 600 G = 350 G = 200 300 keV 1 GeV in relativistic wind SSC dominates above 100 MeV Power law index > 2 GLAST can constrain p 30 MeV Parameters • • G= 600, Dt = 0.1 ms, Ep = 200 KeV Should we expect variability smaller that 0.1 ms? E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Dt = 10 ms Dt = 1 ms Dt = 0.1 ms UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 SNR: Sites of Hadronic Acceleration? Supernova Remnants: sites of galactic cosmic ray acceleration • • Non-thermal emission (X-rays) Signs of g-ray activity • • Question: • EGRET: GeV activity near SNR (3EG J1714-3837) HESS: Recent detection of TeV g-rays Do g rays originate from hadronic or leptonic processes? Measurements in the range of 100MeV-100GeV • essential ingredient to resolve the origin (p vs e+/-) Uchiyama (2003) Supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946 HESS (color) + ASCA (contours) Adapted from Aharonian’s talk at the Texas Symposium 2004 HESS data astro-ph/0511678 p0 model GLAST E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC e+/model UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 AGN (Blazars): Emission Mechanisms Adapted from P. Coppi Most of the EGRET AGNs were blazars • • Radiation is produced by one or more of the following processes • • • • (Buckley, Science, 1998) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Variability: relativistic jets Jets point towards us ! Synchrotron Self Compton External Compton Proton Induced Cascades Proton Synchrotron Key issues to be addressed • • • • • Energetics of the source jet formation jet collimation nature of the plasma particle acceleration UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Time lags: hadronic or leptonic model in AGNs? Credit: EGRET Team Leptonic processes are “preferred” by theorists g rays • Hadronic models have not yet been excluded! Time lags between AGN flares may suggest dominance of hadronic processes X rays Changes in Luminosity in a fraction of a day ! Variability constrains the size of the emitting source E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Multiwavelength Observations Contemporaneous observations with other wavelengths • disentangle effects from state changes within individual sources GLAST will provide “continuous” baseline in GeV • helpful to ground based TeV g-ray telescopes Blazar PKS 2155-304 3rd EGRET Catalog ~103 g cm-2 leptonic model common origin optical/Xray g High g-ray state (Verstrand et al. 1995) ~30 km Aharonian et al. (2005) Atmosphere: For Eg > ~ O(100) GeV, must measure light emitted at the atmosphere (Cerenkov) leptonic model E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC hadronic model GeV-TeV campaigns will complement GLAST science! Multiwavelength planning in progress: http://glast.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/multi UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 AGN: Extragalactic Background Light High Energy photons (e.g. from AGN) can be absorbed via pair production • • GeV (TeV) photons interact with intergalactic photons UV(IR) strong dependence on the distance from the source (inferred from redshift) GLAST will see thousands of AGN • • look for systematic effects vs redshift key energy range for cosmological distances effect is model-dependent (this is good!!): Salamon & Stecker, ApJ 493, 547 (1998) opaque source No EBL Salamon & Stecker source Eg lower No significant attenuation below 10 GeV Primack & Bullock E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC A dominant factor in EBL models is the era of galaxy formation AGN roll-offs may help distinguish models of galaxy formation Chen, Reyes, and Ritz, ApJ 2004 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Gamma Ray Background Radiation Extragalactic Emission • Higher latitudes • EGRET Gamma Ray Emissions > 100 MeV Galactic Emission • • |b| < |b| > 10 0 falls rapidly at higher latitudes gas density concentrated in the plane 100 cosmic rays (from SNR?) p p g ISM 0 g g Galactic plane • Contains about 90% of the g ray emission • Mostly high energy cosmic ray interactions with the interstellar medium (ISM) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC e- UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Origin of Extragalactic g-Ray Background GLAST can shed light in one of the longstanding problems in high energy astrophysics • The origin of the extragalactic background Original EGRET spectrum Galactic Diffuse g ray is subtracted Reanalysis using slightly modified e- spectrum with respect to the local injected spectrum Strong, Moskalenko, Reimer (2004) What is it made of? • Blazars • • New physics • • E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC we can probe… Primordial diffuse • LAT we expect… If else fails… UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Galactic Diffuse Gamma Ray Emission The g ray sky is dominated by diffuse emission Accurate modelling is essential EGRET GLAST Many more point sources Background determination for energy above 10 GeV Sharper definition of the diffuse background (smaller bins in the sky) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 EGRET DATA: “g-ray excess” is controversial After diffuse background subtraction there was an excess of g in the EGRET Data • Revisited pp cross section: accounts for a fraction of the GeV excess EGRET DATA New Model Old pp interaction models Constant inelastic cross-section Feynman scaling No diffraction dissociation -2.5 -2.7 Old Model New pp interaction model Rising cross-sections Scaling violation Diffraction dissociation Kamae et al. 05, Kamae, Karlsson, Mizuno et al. 05, Kamae, Karlsson, Cohen-Tanugi Mizuno et al.05 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter NGC3198 Strong Evidence that Dark Matter exists comes from Taga et al 1994 Rotational curves Clusters of galaxies Cosmological fits to data Extracted from Peter Watson’s website http://www.physics.carleton.ca/~watson/ E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC GMm mv2 r2 r GM v r UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter Candidate: Neutralino If true, there may well be observable halo annihilations ~ ~3 ~0 ~0 a11B a12W a13H1 a14 H 2 0 1 Good particle physics candidate for galactic halo dark matter • Lightest Supersymmetric Particle in R-parity conserving SUSY q g q g continuum energy spectrum Higher statistics… but higher background E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Distinct signature a “peak” in the energy spectrum !! Lower background… but lower statistics UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Can WIMPs be the source of Dark Matter? Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMP) Direct searches: • scattering of WIMPS with nucleons in the detector • DAMA, CDMS, EDELWEISS, etc. Indirect Searches: • WIMP annihilations into other particles • GLAST, ICECUBE, ANTARES, GENIUS, HEAT, AMS, etc Galactic Earth neutrinos Sun neutrinos Extragalactic Galactic Halo antideuterons positrons antiprotons photons positrons E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Galactic Center photons photons UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Flux of Photons from Neutralino Annihilations Where High Energy Particle and Astrophysics meet… Particle Physics Astrophysics F sv J (nˆ ) J (nˆ ) Choose a SUSY model Calculate masses and spectrum Select cosmologically relevant relic density E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 1 R 2 2 (l )dl (nˆ ) line- of - sight Choose a HALO model Integrate along the line of sight UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter from SUSY: g line and continuum g lines Large uncertainties in the Particle spectrum Halo model Background estimation Detection rates can increase if halo is clumpy Dark matter halo Milky Way E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC N-body simulations from Calcáneo-Roldan and Moore, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 23005. UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Halo Dark Matter Searches with GLAST WIMP Annihilations in halo Clumps (b >|10| 0): • continuum g from p0 @ ~100 MeV • lines (2 g, g) (Bergstrom et al) • Depends on models of clumps see previous slide IC from secondary electrons (Baltz & Wai 04) • >GeV IC from e + starlight • near galactic plane < 300 (trapping by B field) KK DM Scenario – electron “line” (20% Br) smeared into a sharp edge via mainly IC • >500 GeV: ~ 100 e± /year edge height • all-sky signature! E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC see next slide UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter: SUSY or Extra Dimensions? KK Dark Matter? SUSY Baltz and Hooper, JCAP07(2005)001 • Lightest Supersymmetric Particle • Neutralino • Accelerator bounds • M 0 > tens of GeV • Search for photons Extra Dimensions • Lightest Kaluza-Klein Particle • B1 • Accelerator bounds • M B1 > 300 GeV • Search for photons and leptons • Charged leptons are not helicity suppressed • 59% charged leptons • 35% quarks E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC endpoint spectral feature !!! Limited statistics with GLAST. HARD to measure but very interesting…! UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Extra Dimensions: Possible GLAST Signatures? Large Extra Dimensions Universal Extra Dimensions Thermal graviton emission (how much energy went into the bulk without affecting cosmological evolution?) (Perez-Lorenzana 2005) • • • • • • • • not on SM particles only E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Limited statistics and maybe DE/E Low Energy Signal ( < 100 MeV) • Photons from qq and synchroton High Energy Signal (hundreds of GeV) • Bremstrahlung of charged leptons Secondary gamma rays • 59% charged leptons 35% quarks 4% neutrinos 1% charged gauge bosons 0.5 % neutral gauge bosons 0.5 % Higgs bosons Primary gamma rays • NS shines because gravitons are gravitationally trapped Excess in diffuse gamma ray emission around 30 MeV Gamma ray emission from NS in the galactic bulge Problem: heavy KK can decay into more lighter KK modes Charged lepton production is not helicity suppressed • • • • • • SN (Hannestad 2003) Massive Graviton decays into gg continuously emitted by the Universe (less robust) Two photons via loop diagrams (Servant and Tait) B1B1 annihilation in Galactic Center • BBN (Hannestad 2004) For n=2 there would be many KK Modes which would release too much energy into gravitons • Gravitons emitted by stellar objects take away energy • B1B1 annihilation in Galactic Center Uncertainties in the background Can theorists give us a signal between 10 and 100 GeV? • LZP (Agashe and Servant hep-ph 0403143) GLAST MISSION ELEMENTS UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST MISSION ELEMENTS Large Area Telescope & GBM GPS TLM: S-band @ 1,2,4,8 kbps TLM: Ku-band @ 40 Mbps (13 - GB/day average) • Telemetry 1 kbps CMD: S-band @ .25, 4 kbps GLAST Spacecraft DELTA 7920H • TDRSS SN S & Ku • • S • 40 Mbps GN • Internet 2 Schedules Mission Operations Center (MOC) GRB Coordinates Network GLAST Science Support Center Schedules Alerts Data, Command Loads E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC LAT Instrument Operations Center Archive GBM Instrument Operations Center White Sands HEASARC GSFC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Operation Phases First year of science operations • initial on-orbit checkout, verification, and calibrations, followed by an allsky survey • • • key projects needed by the community • • limited first-year guest observer program extraordinary Targets of Opportunities supported. workshops for guest observers on science tools and mission characteristics for proposal preparation Observing plan in subsequent years • data on transients will be released, with caveats. repoints for bright bursts and burst alerts enabled. First Year Guest Observer Program • • • source catalog, diffuse background models, etc. Transients • • detailed instrument characterization refinement of the alignment driven by guest observer proposal selections by peer review. All data released through the GLAST Science Support Center (GSSC). E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 The Look Ahead Fabrication Instrument & Spacecraft I&T The GLAST mission is 2005 Observatory I&T 2006 • completing the fabrication phase and • is well into integration. LAT, GBM, and spacecraft assembly • complete by early 2006. Delivery of the LAT and GBM instruments • for observatory integration in spring 2006. Observatory integration and test • spring 2006 through summer CY07. Major scientific conference, • the First GLAST Symposium, being planned for early 2007. E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 2007 Launch UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC September 2007 launch Back up slides Page Number UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GBM Performance The GLAST Burst Monitor for GLAST, A. von Kienlin et al., in Proc of the SPIE-Conference, Glasgow 2004 •compare count rates for 2 of the modules GBM NaI Location • 6 in the equatorial plane • 4 at 45o • 2 at 20o GBM BGO Location • 2 in opposite sides of the spacecaft GBM Trigger same as BATSE GBM Trigger Sensitivity •< 1 ph cm-2s-1 BATSE: 0.2 ph cm-2s-1 (5s) GBM Burst Localization •< 15o within 1.8s (on board) can be used as a LAT trigger if outside LAT FOV •possible to repoint to catch delayed emissions •< 5o within 5s (ground) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC < 3o within 1 day (ground) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST and GRBs Full sky survey every 3 hours Number of Bursts • GBM ~ 200 bursts/yr • > 60 bursts within FoV of the LAT 1 burst/month ~ 100 photons Alert and Localization • Alert to GCN ~ 10 s • GBM < 150 initially, update 50 • LAT > 10 arcmin depending on the burst Downlink and Communications • near real-time (TDRSS) • full science data ~ 6-8 times a day Downlink and Communications • Intense burst: GLAST can repoint keep LAT in the FoV Dwell time: 5 hr (adjustable) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Slide from N. Omodei (GLAST GRB SWG) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 GLAST and SWIFT era • Swift can point for follow on observations. Precise measurements of the position will be given by Swift! GLAST will frequently scan the position of the bursts hours after the Swift alerts • • Slide from N. Omodei (GLAST GRB SWG) GLAST can provide alerts to GRBs monitoring for High energy emission. In these cases, we will have a broad spectral coverage of the GRB spectrum (from 0.1 keV to hundreds of GeV > 9 decades!!). Swift is seeing 100 bursts per yr: ~ 20/yr will be in the LAT FoV ~2020 GBM LAT 2007 XRT BAT 2005 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 0.1 keV 10 keV 100 KeV 1 MeV 30 MeV 300 GeV UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Duration of GRBs 160 (e.g stellar mass BH accreting from a massive disk, rotating NS driving Poynting flux) 120 NUMBER OF BURSTS If there is a compact object at the inner engine, the source must also be active for a long time Long Compact Mergers? (ISM) Collapsar Model ? (wind) 1 cm-3 103-4 cm-3 80 40 0 0.01 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Short 0.1 1 10 DURATION, SECONDS 100 1000 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 X ray Flares Giant X-ray Flare • 500 times higher amplitude GRB050502b Falcone 2005 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Can we detect IC from X ray flares? UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 RX J1713.7-3946 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Complex Modeling of Particle Transport Courtesy of I. Moskalenko Sources of CR: SNRs, Shocks, Superbubbles Particle acceleration Photon emission X + e- Chandra B P diffusion He energy losses CNO reacceleration convection e +etc. + π_ P Halo gas p solar modulation disk BESS E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC ISM IC ISRF gas π0 LiBeB He CNO AMS Charged particle measurements will provide consistency checks for g ray models GLAST Need to model •Number density of primary nuclei •Production cross section •Gas distribution and composition ACE UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 SUperSYmmetry - New Particles A model of supersymmetric particles can be built to explain why “forces meet” at about 1016 GeV For each particle there will be a supersymmetric partner quark squark The lightest SUSY particle (STABLE) in most theories is the NEUTRALINO E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter 1 Energy matter density/critical density Contributions from 0.3 0.7 = M + M matter cosmological constant B baryonic matter B + NB NB non-baryonic matter Ordinary matter 0.05 0.25 Dark matter? 0.25/0.3 ~ 90% of matter in the universe is non luminous, hence Dark Matter What is the origin of Dark Matter? Could it be an exotic Particle? If it is why haven’t we seen it? E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 How many neutralinos are there? To determine the current number of neutralinos (relic abundances), we need to solve the Boltzmann equation for early and late times Hubble Constant Negligible at earlier times dn dt Negligible at late times 3Hn - s xx v [( n ) - (n ) ] Expansion of universe E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC 2 Depletion of neutralinos eq 2 Creation of neutralinos UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 n /s Neutralino: a Dark matter Candidate? Approximate solution to Boltzmann equation leads to Early Universe h 2 m n c 3.10 -27 cm -3 s -1 s v Later… s v 2 100GeV 2 10 - 25 cm -3 s -1 100 GeV neutralino can explain Dark matter with = 0.3 Adapted from Bernheuter astro-ph/0205729 1 /T Neutralino is a good particle physics candidate for galactic halo dark matter E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Models for Distribution in the Halo : astro-ph/0207125 The Dark Matter distribution in the galactic halo is not well known ! (r) 0 r r0 1 r r0 2 0 ~ 0.3 – 05 GeV/cm3 r0 = 8.5 kpc E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Galactic Center UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter Detection with GLAST GLAST sensitivity curve Not too many photons There is no obvious choice for “the” model! With 2 years of data is harder for GLAST to detect neutralinos if the model is below the curve Each point corresponds to one possible model All models assume the same Dark Matter distribution in the halo E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Bergström, Ullio & Buckley, ’97 UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Dark Matter Simulations Credit: B. Moore, www.nbody.net z = 50 z = 20 z = 10 z=5 z=1 z=0 Simulations indicate that dark matter haloes are formed in a hierarchical structure where smaller haloes form first 2 Mpc Simulations of Local Group E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Kaluza Klein Equations 2 2 - 2 xm , x5 0 x t 5 2 2 2pnx5 xm , x5 xm cos R 2 2 2pn 2 - 2 - xm 0 t R Kaluza Klein equation • • • Boundary conditions • R=radius of compactification Effective mass term in 4D (tower) • • • E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Scalar field in 5d Extra d is compactified Radius is order of Planck Scale Each SM field n=0 has an infinite number of KK partners n>0 Lightest KK mode n=1 R ~ TeV, cosmologically relevant UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Gravitational Effects through Compactification The theory from Arkani-Hamed et al (ADD) • • gravitational effects can be enhanced by winding modes of graviton. Every time it winds around a compactified dimension • • It is a periodic coordinate from 0 to 2p It gives rise to additional gravitational force What determines the number of revolutions ? Along this axis Extra dimensions are compactified with a radius of curvature of about 10-30 cm or less. If we walk in this direction we always come back to the same point. R Along this axis 4D space E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Extra dimensions are flat (assume it is infinity) Compactification in circles creates massless states, if we do in orbifolds get rid of these states Search for Extra Dimensions with the LAT UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 The experimental signatures for Extra Dimensions with the LAT are challenging and probably at the limit of the instrument capabilities • As experimentalists we will search and • work harder to improve the LAT performance There are two main ranges of interest • Low energies (< 100 MeV) • Large extra dimensions (see Andrea Lionetto’s talk) Graviton decays • limited by the knowledge of the background • Higher energies (>300 GeV) • Universal extra dimensions Annihilation of KK states • Statistics limited • May require further improvements in the energy resolution Will systematic uncertainties play a role in the measurements? E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Experimental Bounds on KK Appelquist et al PRD 64, 035002 (2001) SM in UED models lead to contributions to EW observables first at the one-loop level (Appelquist et al 2001) • Splitting in the W and Z masses is sensitive to physics beyond SM Depends on • • • • The lower bound on 1/R depends on the cut-off scale (Ms ) The example here is for d = 2 Higgs mass (Mh) Compactification radius (R) Cutoff-scale (Ms) Number of extra-dimensions (d) Non-observation of KK pair production at LEP/SLC implies in • 1/R > 300 GeV • Via T parameter that depends on Mw,Mz,mt, Above here Calculations become non-perturbative and contributions to one-loop level are no longer reliable Less model dependent than SUSY E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Bounds on UED from Searches at the Tevatron Applequist et al PRD 64 035002 (2001) IF KK parity is not violated KK must be produced in pairs • KK to quarks and gluons Run I: Search for heavy stable quarks • Mass > 195 GeV (charge 1/3) • Mass > 220 GeV, (charge 2/3) • Use this and look at production cross-section 1/R > 300-350 GeV Applequist 2001 estimated Run II data will • either discover an UED or • significantly increase the lower bound on R E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Sorry I had no time to get the plots ! UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Kaluza-klein as a DM Candidate Servant and Tait Nucl.Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 B1 as the LKP • first partner of hypercharge gauge boson Prediction of the relic density as function of LKP mass • Varies with model E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 B1 annihilations into photons Bergstrom et al JCAP 04 (2005) Fermion box contributions Assumptions • • • • Halo profile: NFW (r-1) Boost: 100 D = 10--5 B1 = 800GeV Total spectrum: line + continuum 4 3 • 0.5 % 1% • Strong dependence on the details of the galactic halo profile Will we have enough events at this energy with the LAT? • 2% 2 Problems Homework… • Extrapolate to ~ 300 GeV • • 1 New hadronization shape? More channles open up? Photon Energy (GeV) E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Clumpy halo helps See E. Nuss talk tomorrow UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 B1 annihilations into photons B1 B1 l +l - g Bergstrom et al PRL 94, 131301 (2005) Assumptions • Halo profile: NFW (r-1) • Boost: 100 • Vary from 1 to 1000 • D = 10—5 • LAT is larger HESS data compared to 2 UED models • B1 = 800GeV 10—7 • Could be lower 10—8 800 GeV with b ~ 200 10 TeV with b ~ 1000 10—9 Problems • Strong dependence on the details of the galactic halo profile • Will we have enough events at this energy with the LAT? • Clumpy halo helps Photon Energy (TeV) b parameterizes uncertainty in halo models E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC <JGC>D D = 0.13 b UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Lower Bounds on B1 mass from gamma rays Value of average J required to produce gamma ray flux observable as function of B1 mass Bertoni et al PRD 68, 044008 (2003) Assumptions • Halo profile: NFW (r-1) • Boost: 100 • Vary from 1 to 1000 • D = 10—3 • B1 = 800GeV • Could be lower Problems • Strong dependence on the details of the galactic halo profile • Will we have enough events at this energy with the LAT? For a Moore profile masses below 1.2 TeV are excluded if LAT does not observe any radiation from the GC E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC • Cumpy halo helps Integrated gamma ray flux as a function of B1 mass Bertoni et al PRD 68, 044008 (2003) UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Gamma ray excesses are detectable for masses < 600 GeV Assumptions • Halo profile: NFW (r-1) • J average: 500 • D = 10—3 Problems • Strong dependence on the details of the galactic halo profile • Will we have enough events at this energy with the LAT? • Cumpy halo helps E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 SUSY vs UED Cheng et al PRL 89, 211301 (2002) Battaglia al hep-ph/0502041 Nontrivial to disentangle both in hadron colliders • Masses are model dependent • • KK towers of states • • • • Not robust Spin is different ! • Can’t reconstruct them or see resonances Contrib\ution to cross section is small SUSY one extra particle Additional Higgs states in SUSY • • so does not help Hard to measure in hadron machines Radiative corrections make UED and SUSY more similar experimentally E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC A peak in positron spectrum will be • • Smoking gun for DM exclude neutralino as a source UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 SUSY vs UED : Linear Collider E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Tevatron Searches E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 Direct Detection of B1 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC Pulsar physics with GLAST UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 known gamma-ray pulsars direct pulsation search in the g-ray band high time resolution detect new gamma-ray pulsars (~250) precise test of polar cap vs outer gap emission models large effective area E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC UCSD Seminar Feb14, 2006 1 GeV = 1,000,000,000 eV Unification of Forces 10-13 GeV 102 GeV 1016 GeV 1019 GeV PARTICLE ENERGY Gravitational Electromagnetic T O D A Y W, Z, g Weak Nuclear ? Electroweak Supersymmetric Particles? B A N G ? Strong Nuclear TIME AFTER THE BIG BANG 17 s ~10 E. do Couto e Silva SLAC/KIPAC ~10-10 s 10-35 s B I G 10-43 s