Turning the Cosmos into Particle Experiment Laboratory Festschrift talk in honor of Larry Sulak October 22, 2005 Tune Kamae (SLAC) In his first round of 60 years (還暦), Larry has dominated over us, with foresight and enthusiasm, in connecting cosmos to particle physics. In his second round of 60 years, don’t we want to tell him what to do? Career Started in Cosmic Ray Laboratory - Val, Jim, and Pierre were tenants to CRL warehouse where spark chamber films were scanned. machine shop and assembly space (foreman Fred) professors offices small library students’ bicycles “Regeneration” “gap”: no generation gap - Neutral kaons fascinated old and young K1 decay out PRD was respected and well-read. K2 “gap” K1 is “regenerated” K1 K1 K1 K2 K2 Interference K2 Experiment with man-made accelerators - Everything was hand-made and reused several times - “accelerator” “particles” “exp setup” Go underground: cosmic neutrinos - Crazy idea from Russia turned Larry high - “Accelerator” and “particle” went cosmic. IMB Super K Antares Nova p man-mind underground lab cosmic neutrinos Can We Use Cosmic Setup too? - Challenge in borrowing the cosmic experimental setup Setup not well known: for example our Galactic Center Cartoon made on radio and IR obs. by Charles Towns’ group at Berkeley Super-massive black hole Yes, but if… Particle physicists with Larry’s • energy, • enthusiasm, • confidence, and • organization skill can turn the Cosmos into Particle Exp. Laboratory. I am only 10 milli-Larry, so I need your help! Parameterized Model of pp Interaction Non-diffractive inelastic with scaling-violation (ISR, SPS, CDF, Pythia) Total g-ray spectrum (via p0 decay) (power-law proton upto 512TeV) Non-diff Resonances Diffraction dissociation (ISR, SPS, CDF, Goulianos) Resonances Diffr dissoc ISR, SPS, CDF Data are making Impact - Old soldiers are not forgotten Galactic g-ray spctr by EGRET New pp data pp int produces more e+ than e- e+ proton index 2.0 e- 100 MeV 10 GeV 70’s pp data 1 GeV 10 TeV Do We Understand Cosmic Accelerators? So little is known: • Mechanism? only hand-waving arguments. • Electron/proton ratio? no clear evidence for proton. • Max. energy? only guessed Jets in AGN Pulsars and their nebulae Supernovae and their remnants Nature’s Experimental Hall - CERN, SLAC, Fermi, KEK, Darmstadt, RIKEN on BU Campus Supernova remnants Molecular clouds 200 light year Molecular clouds Super-massive Black Hole Galactic Center Supernova remnants Nature’s Experimental Hall in Radio Band - We only see in a 2D projection l=+1.0 deg b=+0.5 Galactic Plane b=-0.5 +0.5 0 -0.5 -1.0 l=-1.5 deg Quiet Black Hole at Galactic Center Many new giant stars are seen close to the BH The BH at GC Galactic Center seen in X-ray Band - We get a quite different image: evidence for old activity? Mild continuum X-ray emission Strong Fe K X-ray fluorescence Collisional excitation? Position of the Black Hole No Evidence for “LHC” in X-ray Image - Black Hole at Galatic Center is dormant now - DEC Image taken by Chandra. RA The black hole is massive but almost dormant. Many young stars are being born. 1’ Surprise!! HESS found a TeV g-ray Source HESS image with radio contour SgrA* Position of the BM (SgrA*) Radio image Galactic Plane l=+1.0 deg +0.5 0 -0.5 -1.0 l=-1.5 deg b=+0.5 Galactic Plane HESS image with radio contour b=-0.5 Confusion, Confusion, Confusion - No GeV g-ray found? - Distribution of g-ray (E>5GeV) detected by EGRET Galactic Center (Sgr A*) New Idea for Instruments and Analyses Needed - Work for Larry’s second round of 60 years Particle physicists have been migrating to astrophysics with • new detector technology (ie. n-detectors, GLAST) • new analysis methods (ie. SDSS, SN search, Macho search) • new physics emphasis (ie. dark matter, dark energy) motivated by exciting theories and big prizes. We need the support team for “primary beam”, “secondary beams”, “magnets”, “floor survey”, “DAQ”. • All objects need to be modeled in 3D. • All wavelength must come out to be consistent. • Lots of models to be tried and eliminated. just like particle physics was in early 1960’s. Why? Finding dark matter, cosmic ray sources, structure evolution, as well as serendipitous discoveries require higher-quality analyses. GLAST- Large Area Telescope - Daily survey in sub-GeV to 300GeV band - g Angular Resolution 0.35o @ 1 GeV 0.1o @ 10 GeV Wide Field of View (2.4 sr) > 40 times EGRET’s sensitivity Low dead time: < 20 ms e+ Large Effective Area (20 MeV – 1 TeV) e– Good Energy Resolution (DE/E ~ 10%) NuSTAR - First spectral-resolved fine-imaging in hard X-ray SMEX mission in phase A Launch date 2009+ • Energy range: 6-80keV • Ang. resolution: 40 arcsec Science Team: Fiona Harrison (Caltech; PI) SLAC/KIPAC, UCSC, JPL, Columbia, Sonoma State , DSRI PoGO: Hard X-ray Polarimeter - X-ray from electrons are likely to be polarized International collaboration: SU/KIPAC, Princeton, GSFC, Sweden, Japan Main feature: Energy band: 25-80 keV FOV: ~5 deg2 Background: ~10mCrab Sensitivity = 6-10% in 100 mCrab sources in a 6-hr balloon flight. Crab pulsar models and Pol. Polar Cap Model AGN/microquasar jets SNR, GRB, BH binaries Caustic Model Outer Cap Model Higher Precision CO/HN Survey - 3D reconstruction Example: CO map around RXJ1713 by Nagoya Group: Matching the size of SNR cavity observed by CO survey and X-ray/g-ray. GALPROP - 3D model of cosmic ray propagation and g-ray emission Andy Strong Igor Moskalenko Larry, your second round of 60 years will be as exciting as your first round. HST image of the core of NGC 4261 AGN galaxy nucleus