RESOURCE MOBILISATION THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION (UBE) SCHEME IN NIGERIA BY DR. (MRS.) RHODA OLAPE ODUWAIYE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ILORIN, ILORIN 1 RESOURCE MOBILISATION IN THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION IN NIGERIA ABSTRACT By way of introduction, this paper traced the history of Universal Education in Nigeria. The Universal Education in the West and East in 1954-1958 and subsequent Federal U.P.E. failed because of factors such as improper planning, inadequate supply of teachers and instructional materials and fund. This paper went further to discuss the need to mobilise resources like human, physical and material and also fund for the successful take off and implementation of the Universal Basic Education. The paper concluded by offering useful suggestions on the mobilization of these resources for the successful implementation of this gigantic scheme, the UBE. 2 RESOURCE MOBILISATION IN THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION IN NIGERIA INTRODUCTION Universal Education is not new in the history of Nigeria. There was Universal Primary Education in the Western Region under the leadership of Late Chief Obafemi Awolowo. There was an upsurge of enrolment of pupils in 1956 to 908,022 from 456,000 pupils in 1954 (Arikewuyo 2000). The Eastern Regional government also launched Universal Primary Education (UPE) in 1956 but unfortunately the scheme ran into problems from inception, which eventually led to its collapse in 1958. The Universal Primary Education (UPE) was first launched in the country in September 1976. The scheme covered the whole federation and the Federal Government was responsible for its finance and control with some support from state and local governments. Like the Western Region, there was a great upsurge of pupil enrolment. The projected population according to Arikewuyo (2000) was 2.3 million children in primary one but by the time the scheme took off 3 million pupils enrolled. The U.P.E. schemes at Regional and Federal levels were partially successful and they were faced with many problems which were actually marred with some difficulties which included inadequate planning, lack of data, dearth of infrastructural facilities as well as acute shortage of trained and qualified teachers (Ajayi 1989). The situation was compounded in the Eastern Region with 3 intraparty crisis of the then NCNC and the strong opposition of the Catholic Mission, who were the proprietor of over sixty percent of schools in the region at that time. In the 1976 Federal UPE the projected data was inadequate. There was shortage of teachers. Half-baked and untrained teachers came on the scene, retired teachers were also employed. Classrooms were in short supply and Ajayi (1989) summed up the problems like this: The scheme was hurriedly launched without proper planning in 1976. This hurried launching, coupled with the failure to precede the scheme by evaluation study of the antecedents, also contributed to the failure of the UPE scheme. Infact there was a shortage of everything except pupils. There is the need to know these antecedents so as to have proper planning for the present Universal Basic Education (UBE) which was again launched in September 1999, ironically by the same president who was in 1976 the Military Head of State. This UBE, unlike previous schemes, covers the junior secondary schools (JSS). Since this scheme is larger in scope covering the first nine years of education and adult literacy, it is necessary that no room should be given to failure. Proper planning should be done and implementation should also be closely monitored. The Universal Basic Education (UBE) Scheme The 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic states that: Government shall strive to eradicate literacy and to this end, Government shall as and when practicable provide. 4 (a) Free, compulsory and Universal Primary education; (b) Free secondary education. (Section 18. sub-section 3 a-b) In response to this section of the constitution, President Olusegun Obasanjo then launched the Universal Basic Education in Sokoto on 30th September 1999, this is barely four months in office. Incidentally, it was the same person, the same place that the scheme was launched. The UBE makes the first nine years of education to be free, universal and compulsory. The scheme also caters for adult literacy courses as well. The goals of the UBE, according to the blue print are: To universalize access to basic education, engender a conducive learning environment and eradicate illiteracy in Nigeria within the shortest possible time. Other objectives are to: (a) develop in the entire citizens, a strong consciousness for education and a strong commitment to its vigorous promotion; (b) reduce drastically, a drop-out rate from the school system through improved relevance and efficiency. (c) provide free, compulsory and Universal Basic Education for every Nigerian child of school-going age (d) cater for drop-outs and out-of-school children/ adolescents through various forms of complementary 5 approaches to the provision and promotion of basic education; and (e) ensure the acquisition of the appropriate levels of literacy, numeracy manipulative and life skills needed for laying the foundation for life-long learning. The introductory part of this paper traced the history of universal education in Nigeria and its problems. The problems encountered would be a warning against the recently launched UBE. Both the president himself and the Vice President Atiku Abubakar agreed that inadequate planning in terms of funding and inadequate schools and teachers were responsible for the failure of the UPE launched in 1976. Adesina (1982) also noted earlier that for any UPE or UBE as it is now called to be successful in Nigeria, consideration must be given to the issues of physical facilities funding and teachers training and motivation. To what extent has the government taken care of the lapses in the previous scheme? And how prepared is the government towards taking off in October 2000? The issue of resources is the major concern in the planning and implementation of the scheme. It is sure that the only and sure resources on ground are the pupils. Other resources like material, human and financial have to be effectively mobilized to make this scheme a success. HUMAN RESOURCES It is well known that the state of human resources in Nigerian schools is appealing. Most schools lack teachers in many areas like the pre-vocational subjects, sciences, mathematics and Nigerian languages. The dearths of teachers have also been the reason for 6 the failure of many educational programmes like the UPE and the 63-3-4 system. The consequence of this shortage of human resources is that teachers productivity is affected and also students academic performance. It is not only that, teachers would be provided in adequate number but the available ones would be motivated. The present attitude of teachers would have to change. Before there can be effective implementation of UBE the job attitude of teachers and school managers have to change. This can come about through motivation. Adequate attention has to be paid to teachers’ welfare. From the pages of Newspapers one gets hints on the preparedness of the government towards the take off of UBE in October 2000. The Nigerian Tribune on Monday 15th May, 2000, gave the indication of the news release published on the World Bank web page showed that the UBE scheme will focus on training of teachers and school managers. To be able to do this and other resources the World Bank has given its financial support. Also in the Nigerian Tribune of Wednesday 17th May, 2000 also disclosed that 30,000 teachers would be trained yearly to ensure the success of the scheme. In the implementation and supervision of the scheme, the personnel in the Federal Ministry of Education, Inspectorate Division would be revitalized as the paper revealed that N800 million would be released to that Division in the next two years. Apart from the preparedness of the Federal Government for the take off of UBE, each state is making some planning towards the take off of this scheme in October 2000. The table below shows 7 the statistics of the human resources needed in Kwara State for the take off of Universal Basic Education (UBE) in both and junior secondary schools. TABLES I VITAL STATISTICS ON THE TAKE OFF OF UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION (UBE) PRIMARY SECTOR IN KWARA STATE 1. Population of school age children based on population 415,850 census 2. Total number of Public Primary Schools 1,071 3. Total pupils enrolment 35,515 4. Number of children out of school 64,335 5. Number of classrooms available 8,613 6. Number of classrooms in good condition 861 7. Number of classrooms needing renovation 7,752 8. Additional classrooms required 1,787 9. Number of classroom teachers available 8,491 10. Number of other teachers 4,672 * 11. Number of additional teachers required 1,787 8 * Other teachers include: (i) Head Masters/Mistresses (ii) Religious (I. R. K., C. R. K.) teachers (iii) Special subject (Maths, Science, Home Economics, English) Teacher. Source: Kwara State Primary Education Board. TABLE II STUDENTS ENROLMENT STAFF POPULATION AND NO OF CLASSROOMS FOR JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KWARA STATE S/N L.G.A NO OF STUDENTS ENROLMENT SCHO OL STAFF STRENGTH MALE FEMALE TOTAL M F TOTAL NO OF C/RO0M JSS 1 ASA 12 1129 738 1867 223 111 334 50 2 BARUTEN 6 1323 347 1670 147 68 215 38 3 EDU 9 1216 424 1640 185 98 283 51 4 EKITI 11 956 822 1778 124 91 215 35 5 IFELODUN 34 2886 2048 4934 344 224 568 148 6 I/EAST 22 7434 3434 10868 627 474 1101 174 7 I/SOUTH 13 4028 3816 7844 355 222 577 162 8 I/WEST 17 6845 6198 13043 533 407 940 221 9 IREPODUN 37 3979 3713 7692 469 366 835 223 10 ISIN 10 812 788 1600 136 111 247 47 11 12 13 14 15 KAIAMA MORO OFFA OKE-ERO 0YUN 2 12 13 11 17 509 1600 2977 1100 2725 327 1045 2927 930 1974 836 2645 53 221 371 191 281 45 131 269 107 195 98 352 640 298 476 14 64 120 54 97 9 16 PATIGI TOTAL 9 215 1214 41233 773 30304 126 4386 89 3008 215 7394 33 1551 Source: Kwara State Primary Education Board From these tables, it is believed that there is proper planning and adequate statistics for the take off of UBE in Kwara State. Careful implementation is what is needed to make the scheme a success. PHYSICAL AND MATERIAL RESOURCES It is not easy for teachers to perform any meaningful work without the necessary tools to work with. Both the physical facilities and instructional materials have to be in place. Unfortunately, the physical and material facilities are nothing to write home about in Nigerian schools. The shortage of classrooms in many areas is so acute that as many as eighty to one hundred secondary school students are packed in a classroom and the situation is not different in primary schools especially in the urban areas. The inadequate number of classrooms as in 1976 scheme where the schools resorted to temporary accommodation in town halls, churches, mosques and even under the shades of tree (Taiwo 1980) should not come on the scene in the present UBE. Apart from the shortage of classrooms, other facilities like libraries, books and writing materials, furniture, laboratories and workshops are grossly inadequate in Nigerian schools and these need to be put in proper shape. It would be disastrous if the UBE in year 2000 will witness pupils writing on their laps as in the UPE of 1976. 10 In the year 2000 UBE, adequate supply of instructional materials should be available for teachers’ use. Modern, scientific teaching aids should be supplied to make teaching challenging to the teachers as well as interesting for the learners. Teaching aids like the overhead projector, film slides, audio and video tapes, computers. The science laboratories should have the basic chemical, and equipment to provide the foundation for the pure sciences in the senior secondary schools. The introductory workshops should have the basic tools and machines to work with. These and many others are necessary for the successful take-off of UBE in October. From the World Bank news release from the web page on the 75m dollars aid towards UBE quoting from the Nigerian Tribune 15th May 2000 says: The fund will also be used to improve the availability and quality of instructional materials in schools and of distance learning materials for teachers. It is belief and hope that the money would be strictly used for the purpose for which it is meant for. Also in the Nigerian Tribune of Friday 19th May 2000 Japan also promised to build and rehabilitate primary schools in the country in her support of the UBE programs. A lot of hop is being raised that since the scheme is getting so much support from different parts of the world necessary aids for physical and material resources are on the way to make the scheme a success. Kwara State is adequately armed with statistics of the physical and material resources needed for the successful take off of the scheme. 11 VITAL STATISTICS ON THE TAKE-OFF OF UNIVERSAL BASIC EDUCATION JUNIOR SECONDARY SECTOR IN KWARA STATE GENERAL STATISTICS TABLE III S/N REQUEST TOTAL 1. NO OF SCHOOLS IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL 235 2 EXPECTED POPULATION OF JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL 153,918 STUDENT 3 TOTAL STUDENTS ENROLMENT 127,454 4 POPULATION OF CHILDREN OUT OF JUNIOR SCHOOL 5 NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS AVAILABLE 6 NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS IN GOOD CONDITION 7 NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS NEEDING RENOVATION 8 ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS REQUIRED 9 NUMBER OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS AVAILABLE. 3,697 10 NUMBER OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS EXPECTED 5,640 11 NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL TEACHERS REQUIRED 1,943 26,464 1,551 78 1,473 881 BOOK REQUIREMENTS TABLE IV (1) Text books Mathematics English Social Studies Primary Science Teacher’s copies for all the subjects Teachers’ Guides for all the four core subjects Exercise Book for pupils 415,850 copies 415,850 copies 415,850 copies 415,850 copies N249,510,000 N249,510,000 N249, 510,000 N249, 510,000 60,000 copies 60,000 copies N36,000,000 N36,000,000 415,850 copies N124,755,000 Registers Record of work Books 15,000 copies 15,000 copies 15,000 copies Sources: Kwara State Primary School Board. 12 N3,000,000 N3,000,000 FINANCIAL RESOURCES It is obvious that UBE to be a success it has to be adequately funded. The Federal Government has definitely increased the budget allocation for Education in the 2000 Budget. Education has the largest share, all because of the UBE scheme. Foreign aids are being sort. The World Bank has given a total funding of 75 million dollars. The UBE blue print specifically states the funding system of UBE, which intends to be shared by the three tiers of government: The federal, state and local governments. The training of teachers at primary and junior secondary school levels will be undertaken by federal and state governments, while that of adult literacy would also be borne by federal, state and local governments. Federal government would however bear the cost for nomadic education. The detail of the funding system according to the blue print is as follows: - primary schools - local government - Junior secondary schools - Federal and State Government - Adult literacy - Federal, state and local governments. - Nomadic education - federal government The blue print also provides for the funding of infrastructure i.e. classrooms and learning centres as follows: - Primary schools – federal government 75 percent and stage government 25 percent. - Junior secondary school – federal government 25 percent and state government 75 percent. - Adult literacy - federal government 25 percent, state government 50 percent and local government 25 percent. - Nomadic education - federal government 100 percent. 13 On institutional and learning materials, the blue print provides as follows: - Primary school - federal government 100 percent - Junior secondary schools - federal government 50 percent and state government 50 percent - Adult literacy - federal government 25 percent, state government 50 Percent local government 25 percent. - Nomadic education - federal government 80 percent and state government 20 percent. This funding system is quite commendable on paper. The Federal Government being the initiator of the scheme may be committed and therefore provide the necessary percentage of the funding on their own side but the question is how committed are the state and local government towards the success of the scheme? Are they ready to release that own percentage of the funding? It then means that the funding of the scheme will differ from state to state to state, depending on the commitment of the state and local governments. The federal government should have a way of monitoring state and local government participation in the scheme. Each tier of government should strike their own side of the bargain to make sure that the scheme is properly funded. Apart from providing the fund, the prudent management of the fund should be supervised. Fraudulent practices that may arise with huge capital projects like this must be checked. Fund meant for this scheme should not be diverted by either state, local governments or even individuals that are concerned with the scheme. Successful implementation should be the target of all 14 those concerned. The scheme cannot afford to fail as in the past, proper monitoring is the answer. RECOMMENDATIONS Even though, the Universal Basic Education (UBE) seems to be hurriedly launched i.e. four months into this democratically elected government, one whole year is left for the proper planning of the scheme before the take-off in October 2000. Towards the successful implementation of human, material and financial resources in the UBE scheme it is therefore suggested that: 1. No education system can rise above the quality of its teachers National Policy on Education (1981). Therefore, there is need to train conscientious, intelligent, skilful, knowledgeable and competent teachers to teach in primary and secondary school levels. It is not only supplying the adequate number but the quality of the teachers supplied will determine the quality of the education that the country will possess. While the aim of the scheme is mass literacy for all, quality education should not be given for quantity. 2. It is not enough to provide the number of teachers needed and train them adequately for the job, the issue of job satisfaction of teachers need to be seriously addressed. It is the teachers that would translate the curriculum into practical terms. If teachers are supplied, equipment and materials are in place and teacher’s welfare is neglected, there would be job dissatisfaction and the success of the scheme would be at stake. There is the need for the government to pay teachers salaries regularly, provide some inconvenience allowance for teachers in the rural areas and give the welfare of teachers an utmost attention. 3. While providing the necessary and adequate material resources in the primary and secondary, the materials should be properly managed. It 15 has been found from the 6-3-3-4 educational policy experience that a huge amount of money spent on material resources were wasted because resources got lost, stolen, damaged when left outside, hoarded or just not used (Teacher and Parents, 1999). The responsibility for managing these resources no doubt rests with the school administration. The resources allocated should be properly managed, kept safe in locked up stores to avoid being carted a way after supply and above all, they should be put to use. A physical and material resource committee cam be constituted in every school so as to properly manage the available resources in the school. This committee must ensure all resources are returned to the main resource centre when not in use, show the new staff the resources available and encourage them to share resources. There must also be a resource centre at every State Ministry of Education. They should create awareness among staff of the available resources and train them in established borrowing procedure. 4. It is evident that the Federal Government is going to commit a huge sum of money to the UBE scheme. The state and local governments must also be well committed to the scheme. The state and local government must also be well committed to the scheme. Fund meant for the scheme school not be diverted. There should be prudent management of finances. Dishonest contractors should not find their way into this scheme. This is not the days of emergency contractors who will go away with go away with governments mobilisation money meat for execution of projects. Proper monitoring from the federal to the grass root level is necessary and should be maintained. 5. Despite the federal, state and local government involvement in the UBE scheme in funding, private enterprises philanthropists and other interest groups in education should be encouraged in helping to fund 16 education through the provision of buildings and other infrastructural facilities. The local communities should also be carried along in terms of suggestion and the scheme. 17 REFERENCES Adesina, S. (1982). Planning and Education Development in Nigeria. Lagos Board publication Ltd. Ajayi, K. (1989). Educational Development and Management in Nigeria since Independence, Ibadan; Vantage Publisher (Int.) Ltd. Arikewuyo, M.O. (2000). Strategies for Achieving Productivity in the Universal Basic Education (UBE) scheme. A Paper presented at the National Association of Educational Administration and Planning (NAEAP) conference at University of Ilorin, January 2000. Federal Government of Nigeria (1999). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Section 18 sub section 3 a-b. Federal Government of Nigeria. (1981). National Policy on Education revised Federal Government of Nigeria. Federal Government of Nigeria. (1999). Blue print on the Universal Basic Education: Federal Government of Nigeria. Taiwo, C.O. (1980). The Nigerian Education System: Past, Present and Future, Lagos: Thomas Nelson (Nig) Ltd. The Nigerian Tribune Newspaper, Money 15th May 2000. The Nigerian Tribune Newspaper, Wednesday 17th May 2000. The Nigerian Tribune Newspaper, Friday 19th May 2000. 18