SMEs: their need for strategic information - challenges and opportunities for SMEs within the life science cluster Hans M Borchgrevink MD MHA Senior adviser The Research Council of Norway The Research Council of Norway Director General Staff International staff Administration Division for Science Communication Division for Strategic Priorities Division for Innovation Division for Science Social Sciences Humanities Division director Staff Physical Sciences and Technology Biology and Biomedicine Clinical Medicine and Public Health Division for Strategic Priorities Future Technologies Division Director Staff Society and Public Policy Environmental Issues, Energy and Sustainable Development Marine Resources and Environment Division for Innovation Promotion of R&D and Commercialisation Manufacturing, ICT and Services Division Director Staff Biotechnology, Food Science and Tax Incentive Schemes Agricultural and Marine Research Energy, Petroleum and Maritime Research Total budget by divisions mill. NOK (2004) misc.adm. 118 Division for Science 204 Division for Innovation 1579 1535 1076 Total NOK 4 616 million (administration incl.) Division for Strategic Priorities Total budget by activities Infrastructure (2004) Miscellaneous Programmes Independent projects Total NOK 4 616 million (administration incl.) Funding from the ministries (2004) Administration The Research Fund 606 Miscellaneous ministries Ministry of Education and Research 204 1 291 Ministry of Environment Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Fisheries 130 Ministry of Trade and Industry 215 324 236 288 861 Total NOK 4 616 million (administration incl.) Ministry of Petroleum and energy Budget development 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1993 (1993-2004) Mill. NOK 1993-NOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 R&D expenses in Norway versus RCN budget (bill.NOK) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1993 1995 1997 Totale FoU-utgifter i Norge Kilde: Indikatorrapporten, Norges forskningsråd 1999 2001 2003 Forskningsrådets budsjett 1Prognoser for FoU-utgifter i 2003 R&D expenses in % of GNP for the Nordic countries compared with OECD mean 4,5 Sweden 4 Finland Iceland 3,5 3 2,5 Denmark OECD-snitt 2 Norway 1,5 1 0,5 1981 1991 2001 The relation between GNP and R&D expenses 1991-2003 for Norway 30 1600 25 BNP, mrd. kroner 1400 1200 20 1000 15 800 600 10 400 5 200 0 FoU-utgifter, mrd. kroner 1800 0 1991 1993 1995 BNP Kilde: Indikatorrapporten 1997 1999 2001 2003 Totale FoU-utgifter 1Prognoser for FoU-utgifter i 2003 R&D expenses (2001) for OECD countries in NOK per inhabitant and in % of GNP NOK per innbygger 12 000 OECD-gjennomsnitt 2,33 prosent Sverige 10 000 USA Island 8 000 Canada 6 000 Norge Østerrike Storbritannia 4 000 Sveits Japan Danmark Tyskland Frankrike OECD-gjennomsnitt 5 200 NOK Nederland Belgia Korea EU Irland Italia Spania Portugal 2 000 Finland 0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 Prosent av BNP 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 Kilde: OECD – Main Science and Technology Indicators 2003:1, nasjonal FoU-statistikk for Danmark Governmental R&D expenses (2001) for OECD countries – in NOK per inhabitant and in % of GNP NOK per innbygger 3000 OECD-gjennomsnitt 0,67 prosent 2500 USA Norge Danmark 2000 Sveits Canada OECD-gjennomsnitt 1 502 NOK 1500 Island Tyskland Nederland Sverige Finland Frankrike Japan 1000 Spania 500 Østerrike Portugal Irland 0 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 Prosent av BNP Kilde: OECD – Main Science and Technology Indicators 2003:1, nasjonal FoU-statistikk for Danmark % annual growth in R&D expenses 1995-2001 for the Nordic, USA, OECD 20 N orge 15 O ECD gjennomsnitt U SA Sverige 10 5 0 Danmark Finland R&D in private enterprises Sweden Finland Japan USA Iceland Germany Denmark Belgium Luxembourg France EU15 UK Austria Netherlands Norway Irland Italy Spain 0,0 % 1,0 % 2,0 % % of GNP 2001 3,0 % Nordic innovative enterprises in % of total number of enterprises (2001) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 Norge Sverige Finland Danmark 10 5 0 2001 New/improved products as % of total turnover (2000; Norway 2001) Norway France Finland Austria Germany % 0 10 20 30 40 High- and medium-tech exports in % of total industrial exports (2001) High-tech Iceland Norway Medium-tech Denmark Finland Sweden USA Irland % Japan 0 20 40 60 80 R&D investments by private enterprises in % of GNP 6 % Sweden 5 4 Finland 3 Denmark 2 OECD-mean Norway 1 1995 1997 1999 2001 Nordic scientific papers in international journals - per 100.000 inhabitants Sweden 1,7 Finland Iceland Denmark Norway 1,5 1,3 1,1 0,9 0,7 0,5 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Scientific publications from Norway with and without international co-author 1983-2002 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 -83 -84 -85 -86 -87 -88 -89 -90 -91 -92 -93 -94 -95 -96 -97 -98 -99 -00 -01 -02 Uten internasjonalt samarbeid Med internasjonalt samarbeid Kilde: Science Citation Index Scientific publications co-authored by Norwegian researchers by countries of collaboration 1200 1000 EU except the Nordic 800 North-America 600 The Nordic 400 Other countries 200 Former Eastern Europe 0 81 9 84 9 1 1 87 9 90 9 93 9 96 9 1 1 1 1 99 0 02 9 1 2 Kilde: Science Citation Index Nordic Science Citation Index 1,4 Denmark 1,3 1,2 1,1 1 Sweden Finland World mean=1 Norway 0,9 0,8 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 SMEs go LifeSciences 1 FP6 SSA (Specific Support Action) Programme: Research and innovation ETI (Economic and Technological Intelligence) HRM i 6RP FP6 (EC PART): THREE MAIN BLOCKS OF ACTIVITIES BLOCK 2: STRUCTURING THE ERA Research and Innovation Human resources & mobility Research infrastructures Science and society Research for policy support Citizens and governance Sustainable development, global change and ecosystems Food quality and safety Aeronautics and Space Nanotech Information society tech Genomics and biotech. BLOCK 1: FOCUSING AND INTEGRATING EUROPEAN RESEARCH ANTICIPATING S/T NEEDS 7 PRIORITY THEMATIC AREAS New and emerging science and technologies Specific SME activities Specific international co-operation activities JRC activities BLOCK 3: STRENGTHENING THE FOUNDATIONS OF ERA Co-ordination of research activities Development of research/innovation policies SMEs go LifeSciences 2 Objective: to support and foster the participatioin of SMEs and SME groupings in Life Sciences projects of the EU FP6, particularly in - IPs (Integrated Programmes) - NoE (Networks of Excellence) - STREPS (Specific targeted research projects) Goal: SMEs should have 15% of budgets in FP6 LifeSciences (now only 8%) SMEs go LifeSciences 3 18 mill. SMEs in Europe 95% of European enterprises are SMEs SMEs contribute to appr. 2/3 of employment and economic turnover in Europe However, Only 4% of EoI submitters to FP6 LifeSciences were from industry incl SMEs Targeted, tailored support for SMEs is needed SMEs go LifeSciences 4 28 partners from 26 countries - 12 members states - 10 candidate countries - 4 associated states (incl Switzerland) Main activities: Capacity building and training - for SMEs and SME groupings - for researchers on how to involve SMEs Consortium building and match-making for SMEs and researchers preparing proposals SMEs go LifeSciences 5 Activities: Promote transregional co-operation between SMEs Stimulate networks of Life Sciences incubators and biovalleys Facilitate the creation of co-operations and groupings of SMEs with similar innovation needs SMEs go LifeSciences 6 To support and foster the participatioin of SMEs and SME groupings in Life Sciences projects of the EU FP6 within the relevant Thematic Priorities (TPs), i.e. - TP 1 Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnologies and in relevant parts of - TP 2 IST – e.g. bioinformatics - TP 3 Nanotechnologies - TP 5 Food quality and safety (11 partners also participates in the complementary ETI ”SMEsforFOOD” SMEs go LifeSciences 7 SMEs will receive direct support, assistance and coaching for successful participation in FP6 Increasing visibility and Match-making will be made through preparation of - SME (activity) profile forms - FP6 profile forms for electronic storage in catalogues for partner search also in search for partners to enter ongoing projects Seminars - trans-national, and with national followups - will be organised on SME-relevant topics (e.g. IPR) for dissemination of information for SME coaching SMEs go LifeSciences 8 Outcome envisaged: The project aims to - contact 2500 SMEs and SME groupings - enter 250 high-quality SME profiles into the database - contact 400 FP6 researchers/coordinators - enter 100 researcher/coordinator/proposal/project profiles into the database - make 300 consortiae take in at least one additional SME partner - and thereby contribute to the creation of the European research Area (ERA) SMEs go LifeSciences 9 The project will recruit SMEs by visiting universities and research parks/ incubators/ biovalleys The international kick-off meeting was held in Warsaw late March 2004 The Norwegian project is run by the RCN, had kickoff late March 2004 and includes - a part-time project manager (HM Borchgrevink) - a steering group (RCN representatives) - a reference group (universities/incubators/innovation/biotech organisation) SMEs go LifeSciences 10 We want to run the project in close contact with - the Norwegian universities, research parks, incubators, innovation units and biotech organisations - other Nordic networking activities in the field of Life Sciences (e.g. MedCoast, ScanBalt, MediconValley, STRATINC) which is in line with the recent Nordic political initiatives to promote a Nordic Research & Innovation Area (NORIA) to obtain synergy and ”critical mass”