Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Eighth Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7 Chapter 7 - An Introduction to Portfolio Management Questions to be answered: • What do we mean by risk aversion and what evidence indicates that investors are generally risk averse? • What are the basic assumptions behind the Markowitz portfolio theory? • What is meant by risk and what are some of the alternative measures of risk used in investments? • How do you compute the expected rate of return for an individual risky asset or a portfolio of assets? • How do you compute the standard deviation of rates of return for an individual risky asset? • What is meant by the covariance between rates of return and how do you compute covariance? Chapter 7 - An Introduction to Portfolio Management • What is the relationship between covariance and correlation? • What is the formula for the standard deviation for a portfolio of risky assets and how does it differ from the standard deviation of an individual risky asset? • Given the formula for the standard deviation of a portfolio, why and how do you diversify a portfolio? • What happens to the standard deviation of a portfolio when you change the correlation between the assets in the portfolio? • What is the risk-return efficient frontier? • Is it reasonable for alternative investors to select different portfolios from the portfolios on the efficient frontier? • What determines which portfolio on the efficient frontier is selected by an individual investor? Background Assumptions • As an investor, you want to maximize return for a given level of risk. • Your portfolio includes all of your assets and liabilities, not just your traded securities. • The relationship between the returns of the assets in the portfolio is important. • A good portfolio is not simply a collection of individually good investments. Risk Aversion Given a choice between two assets with equal rates of return, most investors will select the asset with the lower level of risk. Evidence That Investors are Risk Averse • Many investors purchase insurance: – – – – Life Automobile Health Disability Insurance is one of the few things we buy which we know has a negative NPV • The insured trades a known cost (the premium) for an unknown risk of loss • The required yield on bonds increases with risk classifications from AAA to AA to A…. But Not Totally Risk Averse . . . • Risk preferences may have to do with the amount of money involved – we are willing to risk small amounts, but we insure against large losses – People buy lottery tickets (negative expected value but the amount is small) – But also buy insurance (negative expected value but the amount is large) Which Definition of Risk? • Uncertainty of future outcomes – – • Risk involves both positive & negative outcomes What we measure with standard deviation Probability of an adverse outcome – – Ignore outcomes that are better than expected Investors only really care about negative surprises. They like positive surprises. Rates of Return 1900-2003 80% Stock Market Index Returns Percentage Return 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% 1900 1920 1940 -40% -60% Year 1960 1980 2000 Source: Ibbotson Associates Actual market returns exhibit significant fluctuation around the mean return. Measure the size of the fluctuations with variance & standard deviation Measuring Risk Histogram of Annual Stock Market Returns # of Years 24 24 19 20 15 16 10 12 3 2 50 to 60 30 to 40 20 to 30 10 to 20 0 to 10 -10 to 0 -20 to -10 Return % -30 to -20 1 -40 to -30 0 1 -50 to -40 4 4 40 to 50 8 13 12 Measuring Risk: 1900 - 2003 Portfolio Treasury bills Standard Deviation Variance 2.8% 7.9 Government 8.2% bonds 68.0 Common stocks 402.6 20.1 Period Std. Dev. Of US Stock Market 1931 – 1940 37.8% 1941 – 1950 14.0% 1951 – 1960 12.1% 1961 – 1970 13.0% 1971 – 1980 15.8% 1981 – 1900 16.5% 1991 - 2003 14.8% Risk of Individual Common Stocks Stock Standard Deviation Stock Standard Deviation Amazon 72.9% GE 28.2% Dell 53.0% Coca-Cola 27.3% Reebok 52.3% Pfizer 24.3% Microsoft 47.5% Heinz 23.7% Ford 43.8% ExxonMobil 18.2% Alcan 30.2% Nokia 54.0% Standard deviation over the period January 1999 – December, 2003 Markowitz Portfolio Theory • Derives the expected rate of return for a portfolio of assets and a measure of expected risk • Shows that the variance & standard deviation of the rate of return is a meaningful measure of portfolio risk • Derives the formula for computing the variance & standard deviation of a portfolio, showing how to effectively diversify a portfolio Harry Markowitz • Nobel Laureate (1990) • In 1952, while still a graduate student at Chicago, Markowitz took just one afternoon to convert the notions of risk & return into a set of written rules involving the use of diversification & optimization. These became the building blocks for all future advances in investment theory. Assumptions of Markowitz Portfolio Theory 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Investors consider each investment alternative as defined by a probability distribution of expected returns over a holding period. Investors maximize one-period expected utility, and their utility curves demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of wealth. Investors estimate the risk of the portfolio on the basis of the variability of expected returns (assumes that returns are normally distributed). Investors base decisions solely on expected return and risk, so their utility curves are a function of expected return and the expected variance (or standard deviation) of returns only. For a given level of risk, investors prefer higher returns to lower returns. Similarly, for a given level of expected returns, investors prefer less risk to more risk. Markowitz Portfolio Theory Using these five assumptions, a single asset or portfolio of assets is considered to be efficient if no other asset or portfolio of assets offers higher expected return with the same (or lower) risk, or lower risk with the same (or higher) expected return. Concept of Dominance Return A dominates B & C D B dominates C D does not dominate A B C Standard Deviation Expected Rates of Return: Single Asset • For an individual asset - sum of the possible returns multiplied by the corresponding probability of the return occurring Expected Rate of Return: Single Risky Asset Probability Possible Rate of Return Expected Return 35% 30% 20% 8% 10% 12% 2.8% 3.0% 2.4% 15% 14% E(R) 2.1% 10.30% N E ( RSecurity ) PR i i i 1 .35 8 .30 10 .20 12 .15 14 10.30% Variance (Standard Deviation) of Returns for an Individual Asset • Variance is a measure of the dispersion of returns around the mean • If returns are tightly clustered around the mean, variance is low • If returns are widely dispersed around the mean, variance is high • Standard deviation is the square root of the variance Variance (Standard Deviation) of Returns for an Individual Investment n Variance ( ) Pi R i - E(R i ) 2 2 i 1 Where: Pi is the probability of Ri occurring Ri is the ith rate of return Standard deviation ( ) n Pi R i - E(R i ) i 1 2 Variance & Standard Deviation: Example Calculate the variance & standard deviation for an asset with the following returns & associated probabilities. Probability Return 35% 8% 30% 10% 20% 12% 15% 14% Variance & Standard Deviation: Example n Variance ( ) Pi R i -E(R i ) 2 2 i 1 0.35 8 10.3 +0.30 10 10.3 0.20 12 10.3 0.15 14 10.3 2 2 2 2 4.51 Standard deviation ( ) n P R -E(R ) i 1 i i 2 i 0.35 8 10.3 +0.30 10 10.3 0.20 12 10.3 0.15 14 10.3 2 4.51 2.12% 2 2 2 Moving From One Risky Asset to Several Risky Assets • The return on the risky asset portfolio is calculated as a weighted average of the assets in the portfolio – Weights are the market values of each asset divided by the total market value of the portfolio N E ( RPortfolio ) Wi Ri i 1 Expected Rate of Return: Portfolio of Risky Assets Weight Expected Expected (% of Portfolio) Return (Asset i) Portfolio Return 20% 30% 30% 10% 11% 12% 2.0% 3.3% 3.6% 20% 13% E(R) 2.6% 11.50% N E ( RPortfolio ) Wi Ri i 1 .20 10% .30 11% .30 12% .20 13% 11.50% Calculating Risk: Two Risky Assets • The risk of a single risky asset is calculated as its standard deviation • When there are two or more risky assets in a portfolio, must also incorporate how the individual assets move in relation to each other • Need to understand covariance & correlation Covariance of Returns • A measure of the degree to which two variables “move together” relative to their individual mean values over time – If both returns are typically above their respective means at the same time, the covariance will be positive – If one return is typically above its mean when the other return is below its mean, covariance will be negative – For two assets, i and j, the covariance of their returns is defined as: Covij = E{[R i - E(R i )] [R j - E(R j )]} Covariance of Returns: Example Date Wilshire 5000 Lehman T Bond Index January 2004 2.23% 1.77% February 2004 1.46% 2.00% March 2004 -1.07% 1.50% April 2004 -2.13% -5.59% May 2004 1.38% -0.54% June 2004 2.08% 0.95% July 2004 -3.82% 1.73% August 2004 0.33% 3.74% September 2004 1.78% 0.84% October 2004 1.71% 1.51% November 2004 4.68% -2.19% December 2004 3.63% 2.31% Mean Monthly Return 1.0217% 0.6692% Covariance of Returns: Example Covij = E{[R i - E(R i )] [R j - E(R j )]} [2.23 - 1.02] [1.77 - 0.67] [1.46 - 1.02] [2.00 - 0.67] [1.07 - 1.02] [1.50 - 0.67] [2.13 - 1.02] [5.59 - 0.67] [1.38 - 1.02] [0.54 - 0.67] [2.08 - 1.02] [0.95 - 0.67] [3.82 - 1.02] [1.73 - 0.67] [0.33 - 1.02] [3.74 - 0.67] [1.78 - 1.02] [0.84 - 0.67] [1.71 - 1.02] [1.51 - 0.67] [4.68 - 1.02] [2.19 - 0.67] [3.63 - 1.02] [2.31 - 0.67] 7.00 11 0.637 Note that we divided by N -1 rather than N, since we are dealing with a sample of the data rather than a population. Covariance and Correlation • The correlation coefficient is obtained by dividing the covariance by the product of the individual standard deviations ij Covij i j where: ij the correlation coefficient (small Greek letter rho) i the standard deviation of R it j the standard deviation of R jt ij Cov ij i j 0.637 2.38 2.46 0.109 The correlation between the Wilshire 5000 and the Lehman Treasury Bond Index is 0.109 Correlation Coefficient • Can vary only in the range +1 to -1. • A value of +1 would indicate perfect positive correlation. – This means that returns for the two assets move together in a completely linear manner. • A value of –1 would indicate perfect negative correlation. – This means that the returns for two assets have the same percentage movement, but in opposite directions Measuring Portfolio Return & Risk RPortfolio = x1 R1 + x2 R2 + ...+ xn Rn Where : xi = proportion in the i th asset Ri = return on the i th asset 2 Portfolio x A2 A2 xB2 B2 2 x A xB AB A B Where : xi = proportion of the i th asset i2 = variance of the i th asset i = standard deviation of the i th asset AB = correlation coefficient Variance-Covariance Matrix The variance of a two stock portfolio is the sum of these four boxes Stock 1 Stock 1 Stock 2 x1 σ1 2 2 x1x 2 σ12 x1x 2ρ12 σ1σ 2 Stock 2 x1x 2 σ12 x1x 2ρ12 σ1σ 2 x 2σ 2 2 2 Portfolio x1212 x22 22 2 x1 x2 1,21 2 2 Example • You are holding the following portfolio of two risky assets: Asset A Return Asset B 14% 8% Standard Deviation 22% 14% Proportion of portfolio 40% 60% Correlation 0.20 Calculate: 1. Return on the portfolio 2. Risk of the portfolio Example: Solution RPortfolio = x1 R1 + x2 R2 + ...+ xn Rn 0.40 14% 0.60 8% 10.0% 2 Portfolio x A2 A2 xB2 B2 2 x A xB AB A B 0.4 2 484 0.6 196 2 0.4 0.6 0.20 22 14 177.6 Portfolio Variance 177.6 13.3% 2 Example: Solution Stock 1 Stock 1 Stock 2 Stock 2 Many Risky Assets Portfolio • Return on the portfolio is simply a weighted average of the returns of the assets within the portfolio RPortfolio X 1R1 X 2 R2 ... X N RN Xi = Proportion in asset i Ri = Return on asset i Risk: Many Risky Assets • To calculate the variance of the portfolio, use a variancecovariance matrix Asset 1 Asset 2 Asset 3 Asset 4 Asset 1 Variance of Asset 1 Covariance of Asset 1 & 2 Covariance of Asset 1 & 3 Covariance of Asset 1 & 4 Asset 2 Covariance of Asset 1 & 2 Variance of Asset 2 Covariance of Asset 2 & 3 Covariance of Asset 2 & 4 Asset 3 Covariance of Asset 1 & 3 Covariance of Asset 2 & 3 Variance of Asset 3 Covariance of Asset 3 & 4 Asset 4 Covariance of Asset 1 & 4 Covariance of Asset 2 & 4 Covariance of Asset 3 & 4 Variance of Asset 4 Variance-Covariance Matrix • The variance-covariance matrix shows that the influence of individual asset risk quickly diminishes as the size of the portfolio grows, whereas the influence of covariance grows quickly. • For a portfolio of N assets, there are N variance terms and N2 – N covariance terms Contribution to Portfolio Risk 2 Portfolio = 1 1 Average variance + 1 - Average Covariance N N As N, the number of securities in the portfolio, increases, portfolio variance approaches the average covariance Thus the risk of a well-diversified portfolio depends on the market risk of the securities in the portfolio. Market risk is measured by Beta. Portfolio standard deviation Measuring Risk Portfolio risk falls rapidly as the number of securities in the portfolio rises. Unique risk Market risk 0 5 10 Number of Securities 15 Estimation Issues • Results of portfolio allocation depend on accurate statistical inputs • Estimates of – Expected returns – Standard deviation – Correlation coefficient • Among entire set of assets • With 100 assets, 4,950 correlation estimates • Estimation risk refers to potential errors Estimation Issues • With assumption that stock returns can be described by a single market model, the number of correlations required reduces to the number of assets • Single index market model: R i a i bi R m i bi = the slope coefficient that relates the returns for security i to the returns for the aggregate stock market Rm = the returns for the aggregate stock market Estimation Issues If all the securities are similarly related to the market and a bi derived for each one, it can be shown that the correlation coefficient between two securities i and j is given as: m2 ij bibj i j Where : ij the correlatio n between asset i and asset j m2 the variance of returns for the aggregate stock market b i the slope coefficien t that relates the returns for security i to the returns for the aggregate stock market The Efficient Frontier • The efficient frontier represents that set of portfolios with the maximum rate of return for every given level of risk, or the minimum risk for every level of return • Frontier will be portfolios of investments rather than individual securities – An exception is the asset with the highest return Efficient Frontier for Alternative Portfolios E(R) Efficient Frontier A B C Standard Deviation of Return The Efficient Frontier and Investor Utility • An individual investor’s utility curve specifies the tradeoffs he is willing to make between expected return and risk – the more risk averse the individual, the steeper the slope of his/her utility curve • The slope of the efficient frontier decreases steadily as you move upward • These two interactions will determine the particular portfolio selected by an individual investor • The optimal portfolio has the highest utility for a given investor • It lies at the point of tangency between the efficient frontier and the utility curve with the highest possible utility Selecting an Optimal Risky Portfolio Exhibit 7.16 E(R port ) U3’ U2’ U1’ Y U3 X U2 U1 E( port ) The Internet Investments Online http://www.pionlie.com http://www.investmentnews.com http://www.ibbotson.com http://www.styleadvisor.com http://www.wagner.com http://www.effisols.com http://www.efficientfrontier.com Future topics Chapter 8 • An Introduction to Asset Pricing Models